Yet another Jewish Lie nailed!

The Jews, it seems, have an answer for everything. Phaedrus has been contacted by someone who rejoices only in the name “Leon” (a Jew one could reasonably assume) who has kindly pointed out that the anti-semitic quotes attributed to Benjamin Franklin in an earlier posting here are in fact, a forgery dating from 1935. This type of claim crops up an awful lot when it comes to anti-semitic writings, it seems. Take for example the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion; a document proven to be at least one hundred years old (even the Jews accept that much). This document appears to set out a comprehensive plan for world domination by the Jews and how it could be achieved. Looking around the world today, it is strikingly clear that much of this plan has indeed been implemented and what remains outstanding continues to be, day after day after day, further advanced. Anyone who is not familiar with this document should acquaint themselves with a copy of it via the Web, AFTER, of course, reading THIS little piece of advice…
America’s greatest ever industrialist, Henry Ford, was totally convinced of the Protocols’ authenticity and even wrote a critique of them (which the reader might also like to acquire). But the Jews say “no – these [the Protocols] are just another forgery designed to make us look bad.”
The same applies when one quotes anti-gentile passages from the Jew’s holy book, the Talmud. The Jew leaps up and down with indignation, crying that the passages have been mis-translated to show the Jews in a bad light. We all know this is rubbish, but they nevertheless continue to assert it, even when apostates from the Jewish faith themselves admit the translations are in fact accurate!
So let’s expose these phoney denials for what they are with just ONE useful example: this famous quote from George Washington, no less:

“This tribe of black gentry work more effectually against us, than the enemy's arms. They are a hundred times more dangerous to our liberties, and the great cause we are engaged in. It is much to be lamented that each State, long ere this, has not hunted them down as pests to society, and the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of America.”

Again, the Jews are hopping mad. “Washington wasn’t talking about us Jews!" they scream, “We’re not black! He must have been talking about some other group of people!” Well, it’s true enough. The Jews are not black. But here’s the lie: “black” in the 18th Century had a much less literal meaning. It actually meant “dark-haired” so Washington was in fact referring to the “dark-haired race of gentry” – obviously the Jews.
The Jews themselves are very fond of twisting word meanings in the above fashion and just expect the rest of us to accept their interpretations at face value and on trust. Phaedrus is rather more realistic, however. You don’t believe “black” meant “dark-haired” back then? You want some proof? That’s fine. Just go to any major bookstore and examine a copy of the Penguin Classics edition of Samuel Pepys’ Diary. Pepys was a noted London diarist of the 1660s. On page 1029 you will find a glossary of words that were in common use at that time. You will see “black” defined as “dark-haired” – go on, prove it for yourself! So for at least 80 years before Washington made his appeal, the word “black” had meant “dark-haired” and has only SINCE then come to mean something entirely different. There you have it: yet another Jewish Lie nailed.
The fact that these twisters have been kicked out of every country in Europe over the course of 9 centuries should also give the reader pause for thought about how far the Jews can be trusted and whether they really are simply misunderstood - as they would have us believe they are.