In this extract, Huxley addresses one of the Biggest Lies of the 20th Century - that all men are created equal.
Aldous Huxley, 1958:
"...The orgy of spying, lynching and judicial murder, which these wrong views about magic made logical and mandatory, was not matched until our own days, when the Communist ethic, based upon erroneous views about race, commanded and justified atrocities on an even greater scale. Consequences hardly less undesirable are likely to follow the general adoption of a Social Ethic, based upon the erroneous view that ours is a fully social species, that human infants are born uniform and that individuals are the product of conditioning by and within the collective environment. If these views were correct, if human beings were in fact the members of a truly social species, and if their individual differences were trifling and could be completely ironed out by appropriate conditioning, then, obviously, there would be no need for liberty and the State would be justified in persecuting the heretics who demanded it..."
Here the esteemed writer and visionary takes a distinct swipe against the founders of the United Nations. We have only this (presumably censored) Jewish version of his words from Random House Publishing to go by, but nevertheless it clear that Huxley had no time at all for Communist dogma and rounded repudiated it. It is only sad that we cannot study his original manuscript, for it is highly likely that he would have spelled out in no uncertain terms the inferior forms of life to which he merely alludes here in this 'sanitized version' - for it was written many years prior to the advent of political-correctness and has presumably been 'cleaned up' to avoid offense.
Huxley vehemently eschews the doctrine that all men would be equal in later life if they were each given the same opportunities from birth. Naturally, he tacitly refers to the Negro races here, to whose shortcomings Communism was intentionally blind. The UN/NWO official line is that all extended genetic phenotypes are essentially identical in all but superficial appearance. But we all - those of us in the REAL world that is - know as well as Huxley that there is a striking correlation between IQ and race, with the southern African Bantu coming out bottom of the pile. No amount of preferential, special schooling or 'positive discrimination' can make a silk purse out of a pig's ear. It's an uncomfortable FACT for our white Liberal friends that whilst nurture IS important, NATURE predominates and cannot be denied. A southern African Bantu (or one of its descendants now in Europe or America) can no more become an accomplished scientist, artist or writer, than can a mongrel puppy born in a stable can grow up a racehorse.
If we wish to learn the intrinsic capabilities of ANY race, we need merely to examine their cultural heritage; there's no need to make up stupid lies to pretend things are otherwise. The Negro, like the Jew and the Gypsy, have NOTHING to show for their much-vaunted cultures. They are all incapable of surviving by themselves. The Negroes are simply useless AT BEST, the Gypsies are mostly harmless but can be a dang nuisance at times, and the Jew..... Well, for the Jew I think we need a rather more exhaustive and intensive examination than this study of Huxley's prophecies allows!
Friday, February 29, 2008
Huxley Warned Us: Part 9
Aldous Huxley, 50 years ago in Brave New World Revisited:
"...That a dictator could, if he so desired, make use of [certain psychotropic chemicals] for political purposes is obvious. He could ensure himself against political unrest by changing the chemistry of his subjects' brains and so making them content with their servile conditions. He could use tranquillizers to calm the excited, stimulants to arouse enthusiasm in the indifferent, hallucinants to distract the attention of the wretched from their miseries.
"But how, it may be asked, will the dictator get his subjects to take the pills that will make them think, feel and behave in the ways he finds desirable? In all probability it will be enough merely to make the pills available. Today alcohol and tobacco are available, and people spend considerably more on these very unsatisfactory euphorics, pseudostimulants and sedatives than they are ready to spend on the education of their children."
We now know from secret experimental data released by Russia following a series of experiments carried out in the 1960s that adding fluoride to water supplies in concentrations of as little as 1ppm induces in subjects enhanced levels of susceptibility and compliance - a very useful tool indeed for any wayward government. Our so-called 'leaders' are still toying with the idea of introducing it into our drinking water on the grounds of improving dental health, notwithstanding that its psychotropic effects are becoming increasingly known.
So the big question is: could the dental health motive have been a mere pretext all along? Given that the discussion over fluoride remains on-going long after its mind-altering properties have been publicized, it seems quite likely. If there is one thing Huxley told us that we must never forget it is that our real enemies in the West are our governments. They are infinitely more dangerous to us than all the world's disparate terrorist groupings put together. Do we really know what they're injecting our kids with? Could there be more to it than simple vaccination?
"...That a dictator could, if he so desired, make use of [certain psychotropic chemicals] for political purposes is obvious. He could ensure himself against political unrest by changing the chemistry of his subjects' brains and so making them content with their servile conditions. He could use tranquillizers to calm the excited, stimulants to arouse enthusiasm in the indifferent, hallucinants to distract the attention of the wretched from their miseries.
"But how, it may be asked, will the dictator get his subjects to take the pills that will make them think, feel and behave in the ways he finds desirable? In all probability it will be enough merely to make the pills available. Today alcohol and tobacco are available, and people spend considerably more on these very unsatisfactory euphorics, pseudostimulants and sedatives than they are ready to spend on the education of their children."
We now know from secret experimental data released by Russia following a series of experiments carried out in the 1960s that adding fluoride to water supplies in concentrations of as little as 1ppm induces in subjects enhanced levels of susceptibility and compliance - a very useful tool indeed for any wayward government. Our so-called 'leaders' are still toying with the idea of introducing it into our drinking water on the grounds of improving dental health, notwithstanding that its psychotropic effects are becoming increasingly known.
So the big question is: could the dental health motive have been a mere pretext all along? Given that the discussion over fluoride remains on-going long after its mind-altering properties have been publicized, it seems quite likely. If there is one thing Huxley told us that we must never forget it is that our real enemies in the West are our governments. They are infinitely more dangerous to us than all the world's disparate terrorist groupings put together. Do we really know what they're injecting our kids with? Could there be more to it than simple vaccination?
Huxley Warned Us: Part 8
In Part 7, we were able to see how blanket control over the media had enabled the Jews to become the only game in town when it came to dissemination of information and that the alphabet soup of TV channels on offer that suggest the availability of free choice is simply an illusion. Virtually ALL the networks are pushing forward the NWO agenda by promoting the idea that free-trade, globalization and mass movements of peoples between countries is a Good Thing which brings jobs and prosperity. And whilst we dive headlong into embracing this cultural suicide, the really big gainers, as always, are the Jews. By acting as intermediaries, agents and obstacles between parties in international trade (a core business of this parasite going back Millenia) they can ALWAYS make a good living, regardless of how impoverished those poor fools competing for ever worsening living standards consequently become.
Huxley, 1958:
"In the West, democratic principles are proclaimed and many able and conscientious publicists do their best to supply electors with adequate information and to persuade them, by rational argument, to make realistic choices in the light of that information. All this is greatly to the good. But unfortunately propaganda in the Western democracies above all in America, has two faces and a divided personality. In charge of the editorial department there is often a democratic Dr Jekyll - a propagandist who would be very happy to prove that John Dewey had been right about the ability of human nature to respond to truth and reason. But this worthy man controls only a part of the machinery of mass communication.
"In charge of advertising we find an anti-democrat because anti-rational, Mr Hyde - or rather a Doctor Hyde, for Hyde is now a Ph.D. in psychology and has a master's degree as well in the Social Sciences. This Dr Hyde would be very unhappy indeed if everybody always lived up to John Dewey's faith in human nature. Truth and reason are Jekyll's affairs, not his . Hyde is a Motivation Analyst, and his business is to study human weaknesses and failings, to investigate those unconscious desires and fears by which so much of men's conscious thinking and overt doing is determined. And he does this, not in the spirit of the moralist who would like to make people better, or of the physician who would like to improve health, but simply in order to find out the best way to take advantage of their ignorance and to exploit their irrationality for the pecuniary benefit of his employers."
Here again, Huxley re-affirms his conviction that the mass media is working AGAINST the best interests of the people. His 'Dr. Hyde' character is alive and with us in the West today, too. Yet since we are now 50 years down the road from when Huxley penned his observations, the new Dr. Hyde of today has infinitely more techniques for deception in his armory. Fifty years of endless studies into what makes people tick in the most microscopic areas of their lives has yielded hundreds of thousands of documents and reports detailing every gleanable fact from the human psyche and how it may be ruthlessly and cynically manipulated to ensure that the naked greed of the Jew is to some extent at least satiated. And all this goes on with the full backing of Western governments, the leaders of which have become phenomenally wealthy for their tacit assistance in selling out the true interests of the people. So much for 'democracy.' So much for 'public service.'
Huxley, 1958:
"In the West, democratic principles are proclaimed and many able and conscientious publicists do their best to supply electors with adequate information and to persuade them, by rational argument, to make realistic choices in the light of that information. All this is greatly to the good. But unfortunately propaganda in the Western democracies above all in America, has two faces and a divided personality. In charge of the editorial department there is often a democratic Dr Jekyll - a propagandist who would be very happy to prove that John Dewey had been right about the ability of human nature to respond to truth and reason. But this worthy man controls only a part of the machinery of mass communication.
"In charge of advertising we find an anti-democrat because anti-rational, Mr Hyde - or rather a Doctor Hyde, for Hyde is now a Ph.D. in psychology and has a master's degree as well in the Social Sciences. This Dr Hyde would be very unhappy indeed if everybody always lived up to John Dewey's faith in human nature. Truth and reason are Jekyll's affairs, not his . Hyde is a Motivation Analyst, and his business is to study human weaknesses and failings, to investigate those unconscious desires and fears by which so much of men's conscious thinking and overt doing is determined. And he does this, not in the spirit of the moralist who would like to make people better, or of the physician who would like to improve health, but simply in order to find out the best way to take advantage of their ignorance and to exploit their irrationality for the pecuniary benefit of his employers."
Here again, Huxley re-affirms his conviction that the mass media is working AGAINST the best interests of the people. His 'Dr. Hyde' character is alive and with us in the West today, too. Yet since we are now 50 years down the road from when Huxley penned his observations, the new Dr. Hyde of today has infinitely more techniques for deception in his armory. Fifty years of endless studies into what makes people tick in the most microscopic areas of their lives has yielded hundreds of thousands of documents and reports detailing every gleanable fact from the human psyche and how it may be ruthlessly and cynically manipulated to ensure that the naked greed of the Jew is to some extent at least satiated. And all this goes on with the full backing of Western governments, the leaders of which have become phenomenally wealthy for their tacit assistance in selling out the true interests of the people. So much for 'democracy.' So much for 'public service.'
Wednesday, February 27, 2008
Huxley Warned Us: Part 7
Aldous Huxley, 1958:
"Mass communication, in a word, is neither good nor bad; it is simply a force and, like any other force, it can be used either well or ill. Used in one way, the press, the radio and the cinema are indispensable to the survival of democracy. Used in another way, they are among the most powerful weapons in the dictator's armory. In the field of mass communications as in almost every other field of enterprise, technological progress has hurt the Little Man and helped the Big Man. As lately as [1910], every democratic country could boast of a great number of small journals and local newspapers. Thousands of country editors expressed thousands of independent opinions. Somewhere or other almost anybody could get almost anything printed.
"Today the press is still legally free; but most of the little papers have disappeared. The cost of wood-pulp, of modern printing machinery and of syndicated news is too high for the Little Man. In the totalitarian East there is political censorship, and the media of mass communication are controlled by the State. In the democratic West there is economic censorship and the media of mass communication are controlled by members of the Power Elite. Censorship by rising costs and concentration of communication-power in the hands of a few big concerns is less objectionable than State ownership and government propaganda; but certainly it is not something of which a Jeffersonian democrat could possibly approve.
"In regard to propaganda, the early advocates of universal literacy and a free press envisaged only two possibilities: the propaganda might be true, or it might be false. They did not foresee what in fact has happened, above all in our Western capitalist democracies - the development of a vast mass communications industry, concerned in the main neither with the true nor the false, but with the unreal, the more or less totally irrelevant. In a word, they failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions."
Here we are, half a century on and this situation has, as one might reasonably expect, grown worse still. There was always some element of propaganda in Western media, even pre-Huxley, but it was nothing as remotely unremitting and omnipresent as it is today. Governments and large media organizations (increasingly one and the same entity) could have used their influence to bring about a better society, but they chose, by accident or design, to do the opposite. And the only place where genuine freedom of expression yet survives in on the Internet - and that may not be for very much longer if the powers that be have their way.
The media of today serves - almost without exception - the interests of 'Big Business' with its free trade and globalization agenda; selling out the interests of hard-working people for the VAST self-enrichment of what Huxley calls the 'Power Elite'. Eye-wateringly large sums are made by big business interests (read "Jews") which have asset-stripped this nation and others on an epic scale. The demise of the manufacturing heartlands of the northern midwest attest to this. Ruin, decay, family breakdown, drugs and crime have replaced ordered and prosperous communities. This is all solely due to the Jews' internationalist, borderless world where decent Americans are forced to compete with Chinese peasants and the like who sell their labor for little more than a bowl of rice a day.
The advertising element of the popular media has gotten totally out of control, too. Rather than satisfying consumers' genuine needs and desires as was once the case, it has become a dragon of a business model that festers on our worst fears and anxieties. We no longer buy useful products or services because we NEED them, we buy junk, mass-produced garbage by the shed-load in order to prove to our friends and neighbors that we're 'doing well' and have a 'comfortable lifestyle.' Every advertisement screams out to us that we're missing out on something; if we don't constantly and wantonly consume, there must be something fundamentally wrong in our lives.
Advertising media attempts to make us feel rotten and inadequate and instills in us a a sense of permanent dissatisfaction with every aspect of our existence. The impetus from this form of madness comes from the craven greed of a race of beings who can NEVER have enough and don't care what damage they do in going after it. The American dream was never about having a driveway stuffed full of sports utility vehicles. It was never about having a glamor model for a wife. It was never about taking 4 holidays a year. It was never about having a widescreen TV in every room spewing out its garbage. It was never about so much stuff that the Jews have convinced us, through their stranglehold over the mass media, is what we should be striving for.
If we could only break away from this madness, en-masse, and adopt the kind of lifestyle advocated by the likes of Emerson and Thoreau, the Tribe of Satan would be out of business in a flash. They'd never make a single cent out of us, just as they can't make a penny out of the Amish community. Maybe one day soon when the dollar collapses to Absolute Zero and folks wake up to the reality of the lies, the distortions, the fraud and deceit that's been perpetrated against us for decades, there'll come a realization that all the junk that the Jews told us was so desirable and indispensable wasn't worth jack. Then perhaps we can re-establish this broken, fucked-up society along decent lines. Until that happy day, keep those guns oiled.
"Mass communication, in a word, is neither good nor bad; it is simply a force and, like any other force, it can be used either well or ill. Used in one way, the press, the radio and the cinema are indispensable to the survival of democracy. Used in another way, they are among the most powerful weapons in the dictator's armory. In the field of mass communications as in almost every other field of enterprise, technological progress has hurt the Little Man and helped the Big Man. As lately as [1910], every democratic country could boast of a great number of small journals and local newspapers. Thousands of country editors expressed thousands of independent opinions. Somewhere or other almost anybody could get almost anything printed.
"Today the press is still legally free; but most of the little papers have disappeared. The cost of wood-pulp, of modern printing machinery and of syndicated news is too high for the Little Man. In the totalitarian East there is political censorship, and the media of mass communication are controlled by the State. In the democratic West there is economic censorship and the media of mass communication are controlled by members of the Power Elite. Censorship by rising costs and concentration of communication-power in the hands of a few big concerns is less objectionable than State ownership and government propaganda; but certainly it is not something of which a Jeffersonian democrat could possibly approve.
"In regard to propaganda, the early advocates of universal literacy and a free press envisaged only two possibilities: the propaganda might be true, or it might be false. They did not foresee what in fact has happened, above all in our Western capitalist democracies - the development of a vast mass communications industry, concerned in the main neither with the true nor the false, but with the unreal, the more or less totally irrelevant. In a word, they failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions."
Here we are, half a century on and this situation has, as one might reasonably expect, grown worse still. There was always some element of propaganda in Western media, even pre-Huxley, but it was nothing as remotely unremitting and omnipresent as it is today. Governments and large media organizations (increasingly one and the same entity) could have used their influence to bring about a better society, but they chose, by accident or design, to do the opposite. And the only place where genuine freedom of expression yet survives in on the Internet - and that may not be for very much longer if the powers that be have their way.
The media of today serves - almost without exception - the interests of 'Big Business' with its free trade and globalization agenda; selling out the interests of hard-working people for the VAST self-enrichment of what Huxley calls the 'Power Elite'. Eye-wateringly large sums are made by big business interests (read "Jews") which have asset-stripped this nation and others on an epic scale. The demise of the manufacturing heartlands of the northern midwest attest to this. Ruin, decay, family breakdown, drugs and crime have replaced ordered and prosperous communities. This is all solely due to the Jews' internationalist, borderless world where decent Americans are forced to compete with Chinese peasants and the like who sell their labor for little more than a bowl of rice a day.
The advertising element of the popular media has gotten totally out of control, too. Rather than satisfying consumers' genuine needs and desires as was once the case, it has become a dragon of a business model that festers on our worst fears and anxieties. We no longer buy useful products or services because we NEED them, we buy junk, mass-produced garbage by the shed-load in order to prove to our friends and neighbors that we're 'doing well' and have a 'comfortable lifestyle.' Every advertisement screams out to us that we're missing out on something; if we don't constantly and wantonly consume, there must be something fundamentally wrong in our lives.
Advertising media attempts to make us feel rotten and inadequate and instills in us a a sense of permanent dissatisfaction with every aspect of our existence. The impetus from this form of madness comes from the craven greed of a race of beings who can NEVER have enough and don't care what damage they do in going after it. The American dream was never about having a driveway stuffed full of sports utility vehicles. It was never about having a glamor model for a wife. It was never about taking 4 holidays a year. It was never about having a widescreen TV in every room spewing out its garbage. It was never about so much stuff that the Jews have convinced us, through their stranglehold over the mass media, is what we should be striving for.
If we could only break away from this madness, en-masse, and adopt the kind of lifestyle advocated by the likes of Emerson and Thoreau, the Tribe of Satan would be out of business in a flash. They'd never make a single cent out of us, just as they can't make a penny out of the Amish community. Maybe one day soon when the dollar collapses to Absolute Zero and folks wake up to the reality of the lies, the distortions, the fraud and deceit that's been perpetrated against us for decades, there'll come a realization that all the junk that the Jews told us was so desirable and indispensable wasn't worth jack. Then perhaps we can re-establish this broken, fucked-up society along decent lines. Until that happy day, keep those guns oiled.
There Must Be 15 MORE Ways To Destroy Your Country: How the Jewish Supremacists Are STILL Wrecking America
By Patrick Grimm
The ways of Jewish supremacist treason, treachery and flimflam are a reality as cold and piercing as the point of a knife cutting at the heart of our society and its health, safety and potential for survival. They span out like an eternal unfurling drop-down list of wrongs, all undermining the non-Jew, the European-American and his place at the head of his own table. America’s greatest enemy is not radical Islam or fundamentalist Christianity, but the unspoken threat of Jewish supremacism, its Talmudic Jewish hatred of non-Jews and the political machinations, flair and money of international Zionism. How have they destroyed us in the past and how are they still launching unprovoked broadsides in the present against our freedoms, liberties and ability to resist the toxins they inject into the body politic? Come, let us count the ways.
1. They have pushed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), all of which have served to hollow out America’s manufacturing base. The neo-conservative Jews (former Trotskyites) have substituted their enthusiasm for international Communism with a naïve or malevolent embracing of international capitalism, which is simply an inverted brand of Marxism. It is as utopian and pie-in-the-sky as anything concocted by the old Comintern they once cherished. Of course, these neo-cons care little for the impact that “free trade” policies have had on European-Americans whose jobs are being shipped away to China, Mexico and any other destination where the regulations are sparse and the pay for cheap labor even sparser. All of this “free market” fundamentalism has been the gospel read by many converts in the modern periodical Bibles of neo-conservatism, the Weekly Standard, the American Spectator, the Wall Street Journal and the National Review, all run by Zionist Jews.
2. They have made up the lion’s share of spies and traitors throughout American history. These spies include Harry Dexter White (a crypto-Jew), Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, Harry Gold, Morton Sobel and Jonathan Pollard among many, many others. All of these Jews have compromised American security by passing on our most guarded secrets to nations like the former Soviet Union, China and of course their favorite state, Israel. After the attacks of 9/11, Michael Chertoff, a Zionist Jew and dual citizen of Israel who is the head of Homeland Security, allowed over 100 Israeli spies who had failed lie detector tests and were suspected by the FBI, to leave the United States. They returned to Israel where they were forever out of the reach of American law enforcement. Since this time Jewish espionage has only been emboldened by our complacency and two officials from the American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman have been indicted for passing along secret US documents to Israel.
3. They have accrued a king’s fortune and propagandized an entire generation with the new American religion of Holocaust, converting the masses with the evangelistic outreach of Holocaust films like Schindler’s List, The Diary of Anne Frank or The Pianist. Many Euro-Americans, thanks to these movies, now see the Jews as history’s “premier victims” who have been persecuted without cause, despite the fact that Jews run almost the entire Western media, steer and manipulate its foreign policy and pursue legislation designed to implement a genocide against white people the world over. Due to the lies, half-truths and exaggerated absurdities now attached to the events of the Second World War, Jews currently make up an untouchably holy upper crust, an overclass of elitists who demand absolute obeisance and the curtailment of the rights of non-Jews living within their host country, the United States.
4. They have led the media attack on the American white male, portraying him in TV commercials as a brain-dead buffoon, a cuckolded dunce and a predictable bumbler. He is only saved from his Mr. Magoo-like meanderings by his intelligent wife or a genial and golden-hearted minority, usually an African-American who is educated and amiable. On situation comedies and in Hollywood fare, the white male is either sex-starved and the butt of jokes and disrespect (Married With Children) or a liar, lecher and degenerate (American Beauty). These jaundiced portrayals are crafted by Jewish writers whose views are inimical to our heritage and hostile to our mores and traditional values.
5. They have infiltrated patriotic white nationalist movements, directing their focus away from our real enemy, the Eternal Jew, onto blacks, Mexicans and Muslims. Jewish partisans have even created faux neo-Nazi organizations all for the sole purpose of manufacturing a contrived climate of “hatred” and “intolerance.” For example, Frank Collins, a neo-Nazi who marched through a Jewish community in Skokie, Illinois, was revealed to be Frank Cohen, a crypto-Jew utilized by the Jewish-run American Civil Liberties Union. False flags are the way of Jews and Zionism and arm band-wearing walking stereotypes of National Socialists such as Bill White and others of his ilk who are showered with media attention should be treated with the greatest of suspicion, for many of them are infiltrators bought and paid for by the enemy.
6. They have purchased almost every last vestige of the American political machine and almost every politician with dirty Zionist dollars. At last count Jews provided around 60% of the funding for the neo-liberal and pro-Zionist Democrat Party and 40% of the funding for the neo-conservative and pro-Zionist Republican Party. There is not a single candidate for President, whether it be McCain, Huckabee, Clinton or Obama who is not in the pocket of Big Jewry, ready to dedicate more billions for Israel and fight more wars of conquest for the terroristic Middle East hegemon that is the paranoid Jewish state. If any politician defies the will of the Jews, he will be summarily crushed.
7. They have subverted countless Christian churches, most of which now serve Jewish ends. Rather than labeling modern Jewry as being “of their father, the Devil” as Christ did in the New Testament, most American ministers, especially the televised ones, wish Jews godspeed and shower them with worship, adulation and the moneys of their mindless flocks of sycophants. John Hagee, Pat Robertson, the late Jerry Falwell and other Jew-enablers have only quickened the demise of America and its once venerable Christian tradition by allying themselves with Christ-and-Christian-hating Jews out of fear and moral cowardice and now cheer on the fire-breathing theocrats in Israel who are attempting genocide on the Palestinian people.
8. They have turned the greatest justice system in the world into a universal laughingstock. Frivolous lawsuits, ambulance-chasing and class action suits are the sullied sustenance of Jewish bottom feeders who shop for grievances using TV advertisements. Have you ever noticed how almost every commercial for trial lawyers is generally an ad for a Jewish attorney or a Jewish law firm? Goldman, Feinberg, Nachman, Krasnow, Stein, Klein and other stereotypical names are always found in these ads. At last count, nearly 25% of judges in America were Jewish, though making up only 2% of the population and we now have two Jews on the Supreme Court, who are, not coincidentally, the most radically liberal and leftist on the bench. One of them, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, admits that in her “judicial activism” she follows the tenets of the Talmud. This is telling and is exactly what is wrong with American law and an American judicial process swarming with Jewish parasites.
9. They now control, with a few exceptions, the publishing industry of the United States. With this power they are free to publish and then heavily promote those books which abet their agenda and to ignore any volumes which offer criticism of Jewish extremism or the Israeli state’s hateful policies of displacement, war and death. Simon and Schuster, Random House, Basic Books, the Free Press, Viking and many others were either founded by Jews or later fell to the wrecking ball of Jewish hostile takeovers or a concerted and concentrated ethnic team effort of cooptation.
10. They are the chief movers and shakers in the fashion industry. These Jews have promoted a feminine ideal of sickness, bulimic purging and a female form resembling that of a pre-pubescent boy or a heroin addict. Jewish garment mogul Calvin Klein used adolescent models in his ads. They were photographed “in various stages of undress, poised to offer both sexual pleasures and the fantasy of sexual availability”. These pictures were rightly compared to child pornography. Hollywood celeb mags now tell young girls that Kate Moss thin is in and overt sexual exploration in the very young is normal and healthy. This has led to myriad health problems amongst teen girls and in some cases has even led to death. It has also led to sexual exploitation of children. As if this Jewish frontal assault on our European-American girls is not enough, the Jewish fashion industry is now promoting an anorexic and waifish look among young male fashion models as something hip and attractive.
11. They are the number one reason that America is despised and hated by large segments of the Muslim world. Many Muslims, whether moderate or radicalized, see America as a diseased and degenerate colony run by Jews (they are correct), a New Jerusalem of debauchery, an annex for the bandit Zionist state. They don’t want the pornographic filth that the Jewnited Snakes of America is disseminating around the globe. They don’t want to live under a usurious credit system run by the greedy Self-Chosen and they sure don’t want their daughters to be inundated with the sexual libertinism and permissiveness that Hollywood outre-peddlers count as normalcy.
12. They have drugged our talented and intelligent white children, especially boys who dare to behave in a masculine manner or who prove recalcitrant when pigeon-holed by a cookie-cutter one-size-fits-all educational system run by leftist bureaucrats and social engineers. It was a Jewish psychiatrist, Dr. Robert Spitzer who invented the sham diagnosis of Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) and Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder (ADHD). It used to be diagnosed as “boys will be boys” but no longer. No, any boy who could be a future liability for the one-worlder Jewish agenda must be chemically lobotomized until he is a brain-fried zombie. Creativity and manliness amongst our young males is being killed by Jewish ideologues who are quite content to have multitudes of drug-addled Goyim who are easier for them to contend with.
13. They have been the chief promoters of gun control in the United States, preferring a disarmed American population to an armed, confident and self-reliant one who exercises its Second Amendment freedoms. Jews like Charles Schumer, Howard Metzenbaum, Alan Dershowitz, Diane Feinstein, Arlen Specter and many others have been the pushers of legislation curtailing our rights to own firearms. Of course, these same Jews give a vivacious thumbs-up to the state of Israel, where any Jewish citizen can walk down the street carrying an AK-47 assault rifle or an Uzi submachine gun if he so desires. Jews see gun control as Goy control and like the Palestinians, who are not permitted to possess so much as a tiny handgun to protect themselves, Zionist Jewish supremacists want to be the only people holding the weaponry at the end of the day, a day when they will control everything, including the words allowed out of a non-Jew’s mouth.
14. They have been in charge of some of the biggest drug cartels in US history. Arnold Rothstein (Chicago Black Sox scandal) was the first major American drug dealer and he predated the eventual influx of the “Russian” (Jewish) Mafia into this country. Israeli networks and even many ultra-Orthodox “pious” Jews have been the prime players behind the growing American drug problem, garnering profits in the billions of dollars for the Tribe. Cocaine, heroin and the chic Ecstasy pills flooding into America are mostly arriving from Israel. Of course, mum’s the word from the kosher media, who seems only to focus on Italian gangsters and their small scale (when compared to Jews) criminality.
15. They have been the expeditors for, and the aiders and abbeters of a ludicrous, but strictly regimented dual morality, a jiggered juxtaposition of two contradictory standards of behavior, one for Jews and the other for European-Americans. For example, Jews tell us that “Israel must be preserved as a Jewish state” while clucking that “Calling the United States a white Christian country is racist, xenophobic and nativist.” Jews want monoculturalism for themselves and the slow drip IV suicide of multiculturalism for those of European heritage. Why? Because there is strength and purity of purpose for Jews and Jews alone in countries where non-whites are overtaking white majorities with high birthrates, while there is weakness and anomie for those said whites, who do not possess the tribal instinct the Jews have culled from constant minority status among the nations. Jewish dual morality is devious, shrewd and surreptitious in its sly and almost clandestine philosophy. You could even call it the Jewish Hypocritic Oath.
This list imparts to European-Americans only one thing. What does it impart? It gives us a distinguishable name for our pain. It is Jewish supremacism. Anything we can do to weaken and undermine its power, its scope and its influence is good for us. No liberty, no survival and no future awaits white America without its wholesale abolition, its complete and utter destruction. Are you, the European man or woman reading these words, willing to dislodge this hateful creature of international Jewry from atop your country where it sucks your blood and gains succor from the sweat of your brow and from the lucre raked in from the sicknesses it brings to your loved ones who have fallen victim to its media machine, its influence peddling and its catalogue of lies, disinformation and agitprop? We are losing, but there is still time to win. We do not as of yet require armed revolution. First we need consensus and consensus can only be achieved by telling our people the hard truths “polite society” pegs as verboten and tawdrily taboo. Do not be afraid to speak the truth and to reveal the hate that knows no boundaries. It is the hatred of Jewish supremacism and international Zionism. Disclose this terrible truth to the world!
The ways of Jewish supremacist treason, treachery and flimflam are a reality as cold and piercing as the point of a knife cutting at the heart of our society and its health, safety and potential for survival. They span out like an eternal unfurling drop-down list of wrongs, all undermining the non-Jew, the European-American and his place at the head of his own table. America’s greatest enemy is not radical Islam or fundamentalist Christianity, but the unspoken threat of Jewish supremacism, its Talmudic Jewish hatred of non-Jews and the political machinations, flair and money of international Zionism. How have they destroyed us in the past and how are they still launching unprovoked broadsides in the present against our freedoms, liberties and ability to resist the toxins they inject into the body politic? Come, let us count the ways.
1. They have pushed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), all of which have served to hollow out America’s manufacturing base. The neo-conservative Jews (former Trotskyites) have substituted their enthusiasm for international Communism with a naïve or malevolent embracing of international capitalism, which is simply an inverted brand of Marxism. It is as utopian and pie-in-the-sky as anything concocted by the old Comintern they once cherished. Of course, these neo-cons care little for the impact that “free trade” policies have had on European-Americans whose jobs are being shipped away to China, Mexico and any other destination where the regulations are sparse and the pay for cheap labor even sparser. All of this “free market” fundamentalism has been the gospel read by many converts in the modern periodical Bibles of neo-conservatism, the Weekly Standard, the American Spectator, the Wall Street Journal and the National Review, all run by Zionist Jews.
2. They have made up the lion’s share of spies and traitors throughout American history. These spies include Harry Dexter White (a crypto-Jew), Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, Harry Gold, Morton Sobel and Jonathan Pollard among many, many others. All of these Jews have compromised American security by passing on our most guarded secrets to nations like the former Soviet Union, China and of course their favorite state, Israel. After the attacks of 9/11, Michael Chertoff, a Zionist Jew and dual citizen of Israel who is the head of Homeland Security, allowed over 100 Israeli spies who had failed lie detector tests and were suspected by the FBI, to leave the United States. They returned to Israel where they were forever out of the reach of American law enforcement. Since this time Jewish espionage has only been emboldened by our complacency and two officials from the American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman have been indicted for passing along secret US documents to Israel.
3. They have accrued a king’s fortune and propagandized an entire generation with the new American religion of Holocaust, converting the masses with the evangelistic outreach of Holocaust films like Schindler’s List, The Diary of Anne Frank or The Pianist. Many Euro-Americans, thanks to these movies, now see the Jews as history’s “premier victims” who have been persecuted without cause, despite the fact that Jews run almost the entire Western media, steer and manipulate its foreign policy and pursue legislation designed to implement a genocide against white people the world over. Due to the lies, half-truths and exaggerated absurdities now attached to the events of the Second World War, Jews currently make up an untouchably holy upper crust, an overclass of elitists who demand absolute obeisance and the curtailment of the rights of non-Jews living within their host country, the United States.
4. They have led the media attack on the American white male, portraying him in TV commercials as a brain-dead buffoon, a cuckolded dunce and a predictable bumbler. He is only saved from his Mr. Magoo-like meanderings by his intelligent wife or a genial and golden-hearted minority, usually an African-American who is educated and amiable. On situation comedies and in Hollywood fare, the white male is either sex-starved and the butt of jokes and disrespect (Married With Children) or a liar, lecher and degenerate (American Beauty). These jaundiced portrayals are crafted by Jewish writers whose views are inimical to our heritage and hostile to our mores and traditional values.
5. They have infiltrated patriotic white nationalist movements, directing their focus away from our real enemy, the Eternal Jew, onto blacks, Mexicans and Muslims. Jewish partisans have even created faux neo-Nazi organizations all for the sole purpose of manufacturing a contrived climate of “hatred” and “intolerance.” For example, Frank Collins, a neo-Nazi who marched through a Jewish community in Skokie, Illinois, was revealed to be Frank Cohen, a crypto-Jew utilized by the Jewish-run American Civil Liberties Union. False flags are the way of Jews and Zionism and arm band-wearing walking stereotypes of National Socialists such as Bill White and others of his ilk who are showered with media attention should be treated with the greatest of suspicion, for many of them are infiltrators bought and paid for by the enemy.
6. They have purchased almost every last vestige of the American political machine and almost every politician with dirty Zionist dollars. At last count Jews provided around 60% of the funding for the neo-liberal and pro-Zionist Democrat Party and 40% of the funding for the neo-conservative and pro-Zionist Republican Party. There is not a single candidate for President, whether it be McCain, Huckabee, Clinton or Obama who is not in the pocket of Big Jewry, ready to dedicate more billions for Israel and fight more wars of conquest for the terroristic Middle East hegemon that is the paranoid Jewish state. If any politician defies the will of the Jews, he will be summarily crushed.
7. They have subverted countless Christian churches, most of which now serve Jewish ends. Rather than labeling modern Jewry as being “of their father, the Devil” as Christ did in the New Testament, most American ministers, especially the televised ones, wish Jews godspeed and shower them with worship, adulation and the moneys of their mindless flocks of sycophants. John Hagee, Pat Robertson, the late Jerry Falwell and other Jew-enablers have only quickened the demise of America and its once venerable Christian tradition by allying themselves with Christ-and-Christian-hating Jews out of fear and moral cowardice and now cheer on the fire-breathing theocrats in Israel who are attempting genocide on the Palestinian people.
8. They have turned the greatest justice system in the world into a universal laughingstock. Frivolous lawsuits, ambulance-chasing and class action suits are the sullied sustenance of Jewish bottom feeders who shop for grievances using TV advertisements. Have you ever noticed how almost every commercial for trial lawyers is generally an ad for a Jewish attorney or a Jewish law firm? Goldman, Feinberg, Nachman, Krasnow, Stein, Klein and other stereotypical names are always found in these ads. At last count, nearly 25% of judges in America were Jewish, though making up only 2% of the population and we now have two Jews on the Supreme Court, who are, not coincidentally, the most radically liberal and leftist on the bench. One of them, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, admits that in her “judicial activism” she follows the tenets of the Talmud. This is telling and is exactly what is wrong with American law and an American judicial process swarming with Jewish parasites.
9. They now control, with a few exceptions, the publishing industry of the United States. With this power they are free to publish and then heavily promote those books which abet their agenda and to ignore any volumes which offer criticism of Jewish extremism or the Israeli state’s hateful policies of displacement, war and death. Simon and Schuster, Random House, Basic Books, the Free Press, Viking and many others were either founded by Jews or later fell to the wrecking ball of Jewish hostile takeovers or a concerted and concentrated ethnic team effort of cooptation.
10. They are the chief movers and shakers in the fashion industry. These Jews have promoted a feminine ideal of sickness, bulimic purging and a female form resembling that of a pre-pubescent boy or a heroin addict. Jewish garment mogul Calvin Klein used adolescent models in his ads. They were photographed “in various stages of undress, poised to offer both sexual pleasures and the fantasy of sexual availability”. These pictures were rightly compared to child pornography. Hollywood celeb mags now tell young girls that Kate Moss thin is in and overt sexual exploration in the very young is normal and healthy. This has led to myriad health problems amongst teen girls and in some cases has even led to death. It has also led to sexual exploitation of children. As if this Jewish frontal assault on our European-American girls is not enough, the Jewish fashion industry is now promoting an anorexic and waifish look among young male fashion models as something hip and attractive.
11. They are the number one reason that America is despised and hated by large segments of the Muslim world. Many Muslims, whether moderate or radicalized, see America as a diseased and degenerate colony run by Jews (they are correct), a New Jerusalem of debauchery, an annex for the bandit Zionist state. They don’t want the pornographic filth that the Jewnited Snakes of America is disseminating around the globe. They don’t want to live under a usurious credit system run by the greedy Self-Chosen and they sure don’t want their daughters to be inundated with the sexual libertinism and permissiveness that Hollywood outre-peddlers count as normalcy.
12. They have drugged our talented and intelligent white children, especially boys who dare to behave in a masculine manner or who prove recalcitrant when pigeon-holed by a cookie-cutter one-size-fits-all educational system run by leftist bureaucrats and social engineers. It was a Jewish psychiatrist, Dr. Robert Spitzer who invented the sham diagnosis of Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) and Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder (ADHD). It used to be diagnosed as “boys will be boys” but no longer. No, any boy who could be a future liability for the one-worlder Jewish agenda must be chemically lobotomized until he is a brain-fried zombie. Creativity and manliness amongst our young males is being killed by Jewish ideologues who are quite content to have multitudes of drug-addled Goyim who are easier for them to contend with.
13. They have been the chief promoters of gun control in the United States, preferring a disarmed American population to an armed, confident and self-reliant one who exercises its Second Amendment freedoms. Jews like Charles Schumer, Howard Metzenbaum, Alan Dershowitz, Diane Feinstein, Arlen Specter and many others have been the pushers of legislation curtailing our rights to own firearms. Of course, these same Jews give a vivacious thumbs-up to the state of Israel, where any Jewish citizen can walk down the street carrying an AK-47 assault rifle or an Uzi submachine gun if he so desires. Jews see gun control as Goy control and like the Palestinians, who are not permitted to possess so much as a tiny handgun to protect themselves, Zionist Jewish supremacists want to be the only people holding the weaponry at the end of the day, a day when they will control everything, including the words allowed out of a non-Jew’s mouth.
14. They have been in charge of some of the biggest drug cartels in US history. Arnold Rothstein (Chicago Black Sox scandal) was the first major American drug dealer and he predated the eventual influx of the “Russian” (Jewish) Mafia into this country. Israeli networks and even many ultra-Orthodox “pious” Jews have been the prime players behind the growing American drug problem, garnering profits in the billions of dollars for the Tribe. Cocaine, heroin and the chic Ecstasy pills flooding into America are mostly arriving from Israel. Of course, mum’s the word from the kosher media, who seems only to focus on Italian gangsters and their small scale (when compared to Jews) criminality.
15. They have been the expeditors for, and the aiders and abbeters of a ludicrous, but strictly regimented dual morality, a jiggered juxtaposition of two contradictory standards of behavior, one for Jews and the other for European-Americans. For example, Jews tell us that “Israel must be preserved as a Jewish state” while clucking that “Calling the United States a white Christian country is racist, xenophobic and nativist.” Jews want monoculturalism for themselves and the slow drip IV suicide of multiculturalism for those of European heritage. Why? Because there is strength and purity of purpose for Jews and Jews alone in countries where non-whites are overtaking white majorities with high birthrates, while there is weakness and anomie for those said whites, who do not possess the tribal instinct the Jews have culled from constant minority status among the nations. Jewish dual morality is devious, shrewd and surreptitious in its sly and almost clandestine philosophy. You could even call it the Jewish Hypocritic Oath.
This list imparts to European-Americans only one thing. What does it impart? It gives us a distinguishable name for our pain. It is Jewish supremacism. Anything we can do to weaken and undermine its power, its scope and its influence is good for us. No liberty, no survival and no future awaits white America without its wholesale abolition, its complete and utter destruction. Are you, the European man or woman reading these words, willing to dislodge this hateful creature of international Jewry from atop your country where it sucks your blood and gains succor from the sweat of your brow and from the lucre raked in from the sicknesses it brings to your loved ones who have fallen victim to its media machine, its influence peddling and its catalogue of lies, disinformation and agitprop? We are losing, but there is still time to win. We do not as of yet require armed revolution. First we need consensus and consensus can only be achieved by telling our people the hard truths “polite society” pegs as verboten and tawdrily taboo. Do not be afraid to speak the truth and to reveal the hate that knows no boundaries. It is the hatred of Jewish supremacism and international Zionism. Disclose this terrible truth to the world!
Friday, February 22, 2008
Jewish Satanic Abuse and Child Sacrifice
So all this talk about child sacrifice is simply outrageous lies made up by the Jew-haters, uh?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRYm5YtaCQo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRYm5YtaCQo
Huxley warned Us: Part 6
Aldous Huxley writing in 'Brave New World Revisited' exactly 50 years ago:
"Jefferson said: 'If a nation expects to be ignorant and free
it expects what never was and never will be ... The people cannot be safe without information. Where the press is free, and every man able to read, all is safe.'"
He continues:
"Across the Atlantic another passionate believer in reason was thinking, about the same time, in almost precisely similar terms. Here is what John Stuart Mill wrote of his father, the utilitarian philosopher, James Mill: 'So complete was his reliance upon the influence of reason over the minds of mankind, whenever it is [attention-grabbing] distractions of the most fascinating nature are deliberately used as instruments of policy, for the purpose of preventing people from paying too much attention to the realities of the social and political situation.
"The other world of religion is different from the other world of entertainment; but they still resemble one another in being most decidedly 'not of this world'. Both are distractions and, if lived in too continuously, both can become, in Marx's phrase, 'the opium of the people' and so a threat to freedom. Only the vigilant can maintain their liberties, and only those who are constantly and intelligently on the spot can hope to govern themselves effectively by democratic procedures.
" A society, most of whose members spend a great part of their time not on the spot, not here and now and in the calculable future, but somewhere else, in the irrelevant other worlds of sport and soap opera, of mythology and metaphysical fantasy, will find it hard to resist the encroachments of those who would manipulate and control it."
Consider for a moment the incisive nature and power of this simple observation. Huxley at once within one and the same sentence correctly identifies the fundamental reasons behind the way we live today: a disingenuous, Jew-controlled media, an utterly corrupted government, and the masses of idle, ignorant, gullible propaganda-consumers.
Thankfully, you and I, Gentile reader, are not among this class of the intellectually impoverished. We have awoken to the threats that surround us. We are wise to the motivations of those behind it. It is our DUTY to ensure everyone else is likewise made aware of exactly what has been going on now for many decades. The only 'free press' today is the Internet. Out the Liars and murderers! To hell with them! Expose them all!
"Jefferson said: 'If a nation expects to be ignorant and free
it expects what never was and never will be ... The people cannot be safe without information. Where the press is free, and every man able to read, all is safe.'"
He continues:
"Across the Atlantic another passionate believer in reason was thinking, about the same time, in almost precisely similar terms. Here is what John Stuart Mill wrote of his father, the utilitarian philosopher, James Mill: 'So complete was his reliance upon the influence of reason over the minds of mankind, whenever it is [attention-grabbing] distractions of the most fascinating nature are deliberately used as instruments of policy, for the purpose of preventing people from paying too much attention to the realities of the social and political situation.
"The other world of religion is different from the other world of entertainment; but they still resemble one another in being most decidedly 'not of this world'. Both are distractions and, if lived in too continuously, both can become, in Marx's phrase, 'the opium of the people' and so a threat to freedom. Only the vigilant can maintain their liberties, and only those who are constantly and intelligently on the spot can hope to govern themselves effectively by democratic procedures.
" A society, most of whose members spend a great part of their time not on the spot, not here and now and in the calculable future, but somewhere else, in the irrelevant other worlds of sport and soap opera, of mythology and metaphysical fantasy, will find it hard to resist the encroachments of those who would manipulate and control it."
Consider for a moment the incisive nature and power of this simple observation. Huxley at once within one and the same sentence correctly identifies the fundamental reasons behind the way we live today: a disingenuous, Jew-controlled media, an utterly corrupted government, and the masses of idle, ignorant, gullible propaganda-consumers.
Thankfully, you and I, Gentile reader, are not among this class of the intellectually impoverished. We have awoken to the threats that surround us. We are wise to the motivations of those behind it. It is our DUTY to ensure everyone else is likewise made aware of exactly what has been going on now for many decades. The only 'free press' today is the Internet. Out the Liars and murderers! To hell with them! Expose them all!
Huxley Warned Us: Part 5
Please see the intro from Part 1 if you haven't already.
Aldous Huxley, 1958:
"No people that passes abruptly from a state of subservience under the rule of a despot to the completely unfamiliar state of political independence can be said to have a fair chance of making democratic institutions work. Again, no people in a precarious economic condition has a fair chance of being able to govern itself democratically. [true freedom] flourishes in an atmosphere of prosperity and declines as declining prosperity makes it necessary for the government to intervene ever more frequently and drastically in the affairs of its subjects. Overpopulation and over-organization are two conditions which, as I have already pointed out, deprive a society of a fair chance of making democratic institutions work effectively. We see, then, that there are certain historical, economic, demographic and technological conditions which make it very hard for Jefferson's rational animals, endowed by nature with inalienable rights and an innate sense of justice, to exercise their reason, claim their rights and act justly within a democratically organized society. We in the West have been supremely fortunate in having been given our fair chance of making the great experiment in self-government. Unfortunately it now looks as though, owing to recent changes in our circumstances, this infinitely precious fair chance were being, little by little, taken away from us. And this, of course, is not the whole story. These blind impersonal forces are not the only enemies of individual liberty and democratic institutions. There are also forces of another, less abstract character, forces that can be deliberately used by power-seeking individuals whose aim is to establish partial or complete control over their fellows. Fifty years ago, when I was a boy, it seemed completely self-evident that the bad old days were over, that torture and massacre, slavery, and the persecution of heretics, were things of the past. Among people who wore top hats, traveled in trains, and took a bath every morning such horrors were simply out of the question. After all we were living in the twentieth century. A few years later these people who took daily baths and went to church in top hats were committing atrocities on a scale undreamed of by the benighted Africans and Asiatics. In the light of recent history it would be foolish to suppose that this sort of thing cannot happen again. It can and, no doubt, it will. But in the immediate future there is some reason to believe that the punitive methods of I984 will give place to the reinforcements and manipulations of Brave New World."
Huxley initially points out that democracy as it once was, in the long golden period following Independence in 1776, delivered the goods. The monolithic tenants of the Constitution had only recently been formulated and were at that time entirely safe from the kind of revisions and attacks from Jewish shyster lawyers for whom the sight of a successful, prosperous and peaceful country was to become simply unacceptable.
Hard working European people, their strong, principled leaders and 24 karat gold governance based on openness, integrity, free speech, individual liberty and carefully-drafted legal framework guaranteed the stunning success of young America. It swiftly rose to become the world's richest and most powerful country thanks entirely to the vision of the founding fathers and the hard work, honesty and enterprise of the northern European settlers who built a paradise on earth the like of which the world had never before seen.
Obviously, we all know what has happened since and who exactly it is that is responsible for our collective demise. Huxley in his day correctly predicted that the age of the 'social engineer' was about to commence. Out of the two great dystopian paths, it was more likely that in the drive to gain total control of the masses, the forces of darkness would opt for subtle mind-manipulation rather than outright physical brutality. And for many decades, this was indeed the way of things.
However, whilst social engineering (such as political-correctness and massive immigration, the encouragement of inter-racial breeding and the destruction of the family unit (and through this, society as a whole) have been the core techniques for the implementation of these changes, we have lately seen very much more ruthless methods coming into play which if permitted to continue, will eventually see the infinitely more menacing methodology of Nineteen Eighty-Four coming to fruition.
In fact we have already seen Orwellian developments growing at a pace - since Washington's NeoConmen took the helm 8 years ago. Extraordinary rendition, torture, pre-empitive strikes, the silencing of dissenting voices, the massive increase in the prison population, the use of agencies like the ATF and their sibling clone agencies to act as stormtroopers against America's own citizens. The entire process is now taking on a far more baleful dimension. Legislation is already on the shelf which would - at a stroke - turn America into a clone of 1930s Stalinist Russia. And all that is required is one single precipitating event to bring this about...
We will not have long to wait, either. The trigger might be a genuine external threat, it may be another false flag operation, or it may come from America's repeated provocation of Russia. Either which way, when it happens (and it WILL - and soon) we will have our remaining (already weakened) rights whisked away in the blink of an eye. What happens next will not be pretty. Untold thousands of good men will die and our lives will never be the same again. Our freedoms will be history - at least for a while - and if we do not prevail, our children and their children will be slaves in perpetuity.
But you know what? Maybe we deserve such a future, for we did NOTHING to nip this situation in the bud when the possibility to seize our country back without bloodshed was within our grasp. Now it's probably too late, without considerable loss of life, to do so. Our collective inaction means that when the day of reckoning comes, we'll have a FAR higher price to pay because we didn't act at the outset. it all points to an unavoidable blood bath in which very many of us will perish. Such is the price of early inaction.
Aldous Huxley, 1958:
"No people that passes abruptly from a state of subservience under the rule of a despot to the completely unfamiliar state of political independence can be said to have a fair chance of making democratic institutions work. Again, no people in a precarious economic condition has a fair chance of being able to govern itself democratically. [true freedom] flourishes in an atmosphere of prosperity and declines as declining prosperity makes it necessary for the government to intervene ever more frequently and drastically in the affairs of its subjects. Overpopulation and over-organization are two conditions which, as I have already pointed out, deprive a society of a fair chance of making democratic institutions work effectively. We see, then, that there are certain historical, economic, demographic and technological conditions which make it very hard for Jefferson's rational animals, endowed by nature with inalienable rights and an innate sense of justice, to exercise their reason, claim their rights and act justly within a democratically organized society. We in the West have been supremely fortunate in having been given our fair chance of making the great experiment in self-government. Unfortunately it now looks as though, owing to recent changes in our circumstances, this infinitely precious fair chance were being, little by little, taken away from us. And this, of course, is not the whole story. These blind impersonal forces are not the only enemies of individual liberty and democratic institutions. There are also forces of another, less abstract character, forces that can be deliberately used by power-seeking individuals whose aim is to establish partial or complete control over their fellows. Fifty years ago, when I was a boy, it seemed completely self-evident that the bad old days were over, that torture and massacre, slavery, and the persecution of heretics, were things of the past. Among people who wore top hats, traveled in trains, and took a bath every morning such horrors were simply out of the question. After all we were living in the twentieth century. A few years later these people who took daily baths and went to church in top hats were committing atrocities on a scale undreamed of by the benighted Africans and Asiatics. In the light of recent history it would be foolish to suppose that this sort of thing cannot happen again. It can and, no doubt, it will. But in the immediate future there is some reason to believe that the punitive methods of I984 will give place to the reinforcements and manipulations of Brave New World."
Huxley initially points out that democracy as it once was, in the long golden period following Independence in 1776, delivered the goods. The monolithic tenants of the Constitution had only recently been formulated and were at that time entirely safe from the kind of revisions and attacks from Jewish shyster lawyers for whom the sight of a successful, prosperous and peaceful country was to become simply unacceptable.
Hard working European people, their strong, principled leaders and 24 karat gold governance based on openness, integrity, free speech, individual liberty and carefully-drafted legal framework guaranteed the stunning success of young America. It swiftly rose to become the world's richest and most powerful country thanks entirely to the vision of the founding fathers and the hard work, honesty and enterprise of the northern European settlers who built a paradise on earth the like of which the world had never before seen.
Obviously, we all know what has happened since and who exactly it is that is responsible for our collective demise. Huxley in his day correctly predicted that the age of the 'social engineer' was about to commence. Out of the two great dystopian paths, it was more likely that in the drive to gain total control of the masses, the forces of darkness would opt for subtle mind-manipulation rather than outright physical brutality. And for many decades, this was indeed the way of things.
However, whilst social engineering (such as political-correctness and massive immigration, the encouragement of inter-racial breeding and the destruction of the family unit (and through this, society as a whole) have been the core techniques for the implementation of these changes, we have lately seen very much more ruthless methods coming into play which if permitted to continue, will eventually see the infinitely more menacing methodology of Nineteen Eighty-Four coming to fruition.
In fact we have already seen Orwellian developments growing at a pace - since Washington's NeoConmen took the helm 8 years ago. Extraordinary rendition, torture, pre-empitive strikes, the silencing of dissenting voices, the massive increase in the prison population, the use of agencies like the ATF and their sibling clone agencies to act as stormtroopers against America's own citizens. The entire process is now taking on a far more baleful dimension. Legislation is already on the shelf which would - at a stroke - turn America into a clone of 1930s Stalinist Russia. And all that is required is one single precipitating event to bring this about...
We will not have long to wait, either. The trigger might be a genuine external threat, it may be another false flag operation, or it may come from America's repeated provocation of Russia. Either which way, when it happens (and it WILL - and soon) we will have our remaining (already weakened) rights whisked away in the blink of an eye. What happens next will not be pretty. Untold thousands of good men will die and our lives will never be the same again. Our freedoms will be history - at least for a while - and if we do not prevail, our children and their children will be slaves in perpetuity.
But you know what? Maybe we deserve such a future, for we did NOTHING to nip this situation in the bud when the possibility to seize our country back without bloodshed was within our grasp. Now it's probably too late, without considerable loss of life, to do so. Our collective inaction means that when the day of reckoning comes, we'll have a FAR higher price to pay because we didn't act at the outset. it all points to an unavoidable blood bath in which very many of us will perish. Such is the price of early inaction.
Further evidence that the 'Judeo-Christian tradition' is bunk!
Discrediting the Big Lie that Judaism and Christianity share any common history or values is a bit like shooting fish in a barrel. In this article, Phaedrus invites us to place another aspect of Judaism under the microscope and inspect it for any signs of Christian influence.
Ever heard of the term 'Golem?' Is the term familiar to you? No? Check out this page from the Wikipedia. You should find it rather interesting...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golem
Well, this is quite a revelation, wouldn't you say? Can you spot the commonality between Judaism and Christianity in the creation of such a destructive entity? No? The more one reads about these weird curiosities concerning the Jewish faith, the more it becomes clear that Christianity is the absolute antithesis of Judaism. If Judaism has any common ground at all with other belief systems, then it is far closer to witchcraft, satanism, shamanism, animism, voodoo and hoodoo. Can you imagine Jesus creating a Golem?
Judaism is just plain, downright creepy and evil. And this uncomfortable little fact probably accounts for why some of the most unspeakably dreadful horror films ever made have been conceived by Jewish movie directors.
Ever heard of the term 'Golem?' Is the term familiar to you? No? Check out this page from the Wikipedia. You should find it rather interesting...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golem
Well, this is quite a revelation, wouldn't you say? Can you spot the commonality between Judaism and Christianity in the creation of such a destructive entity? No? The more one reads about these weird curiosities concerning the Jewish faith, the more it becomes clear that Christianity is the absolute antithesis of Judaism. If Judaism has any common ground at all with other belief systems, then it is far closer to witchcraft, satanism, shamanism, animism, voodoo and hoodoo. Can you imagine Jesus creating a Golem?
Judaism is just plain, downright creepy and evil. And this uncomfortable little fact probably accounts for why some of the most unspeakably dreadful horror films ever made have been conceived by Jewish movie directors.
The Kosovo Issue for people in a hurry
Phaedrus appreciates that most folks are too busy just trying to simply stay alive these days to read up on everything that goes on around the world - however much as they might wish to - so World Peace provides a helpful solution with a short, comprehensive briefing which busy people can digest in less than 10 minutes.
The Kosovo issue is worth acquainting oneself with for a number of reasons, so let's take a look at it concisely in plain language. To get the picture across in a way which is more meaningful for the average reader, we'll mentally re-situate Kosovo within North America for the sake of illustration.
Consider you live in Texas and always have, as has your family for generations. You consider yourself an American and a Texan. Your values are American values and you have a certain pride in your country and your state.
Now consider that over the course of many decades, Mexicans have been increasingly flooding in to such an extent that you and your people have now become the minority. Your people have become outnumbered 95% by ethnic Mexicans. You're not happy about the situation, but there's not much you can do about it. You and the Mexicans are obliged to co-exist together. Your northern European cultural roots have been all but wiped out and you've become confined to a small ghetto in the north-western-most region of the state. Resignedly, you knuckle under and proceed to make the best you can of a bum situation.
One fine day, however, the Mexicans - having reached a critical mass - decide that there's enough of them to unilaterally declare Texas an independent, Hispanic state! They replace the flags of Texas and the US with their own colors. They draft and start to enforce their own laws. They erect border crossing controls with the neighboring US states, so now whenever you leave Texas and return, you have to stop at the crossing and present your travel authority, visa, passport, whatever to a Mexican border force. You'd rightly feel pretty pissed-off, wouldn't you?
Still, no doubt the UN will sort the problem out and put these usurpers back in their place! Not an unreasonable expectation, wouldn't you say? But there's a deafening silence... Next and more alarmingly, some old established countries from around the world suddenly announce that they recognize 'Hispania' and will treat it as a new, independent country! Your statehood, your laws, your culture, your way of life have been stolen from under your noses with the blessing of the 'international community'!
Incredibly, this is what has happened in the former Yugoslavian republic of Serbia. Serbia is a fully fledged country in its own right. It has a very long and noble history dating right back to the middle ages. Yet a bunch of expatriate, Albanian gypsies have annexed part of it for their own exclusive use! If they were so proud of their Albanian roots they could have simply returned to Albania, you might think. But that's not what they've done. They are foreigners that don't even belong in the country, but they've sectioned off part of it exclusively for themselves and now require its original, historical inhabitants to submit to their rule!
The most important aspect of this development for us to remember here in the West is the countries who have chosen to support this move and the speed with which they have done so. Smells like a set-up? You bet. America, Britain, France, Germany. Four of the most Jew-dominated countries in the world, all hell-bent on forcing through the New World Order agenda. If you were a Texan and the Mexicans annexed it for themselves and Russia immediately rubber-stamped the change, you'd naturally be more than a little upset. Now perhaps we can see why the Serbians have burned the American flag.
The Kosovo issue is worth acquainting oneself with for a number of reasons, so let's take a look at it concisely in plain language. To get the picture across in a way which is more meaningful for the average reader, we'll mentally re-situate Kosovo within North America for the sake of illustration.
Consider you live in Texas and always have, as has your family for generations. You consider yourself an American and a Texan. Your values are American values and you have a certain pride in your country and your state.
Now consider that over the course of many decades, Mexicans have been increasingly flooding in to such an extent that you and your people have now become the minority. Your people have become outnumbered 95% by ethnic Mexicans. You're not happy about the situation, but there's not much you can do about it. You and the Mexicans are obliged to co-exist together. Your northern European cultural roots have been all but wiped out and you've become confined to a small ghetto in the north-western-most region of the state. Resignedly, you knuckle under and proceed to make the best you can of a bum situation.
One fine day, however, the Mexicans - having reached a critical mass - decide that there's enough of them to unilaterally declare Texas an independent, Hispanic state! They replace the flags of Texas and the US with their own colors. They draft and start to enforce their own laws. They erect border crossing controls with the neighboring US states, so now whenever you leave Texas and return, you have to stop at the crossing and present your travel authority, visa, passport, whatever to a Mexican border force. You'd rightly feel pretty pissed-off, wouldn't you?
Still, no doubt the UN will sort the problem out and put these usurpers back in their place! Not an unreasonable expectation, wouldn't you say? But there's a deafening silence... Next and more alarmingly, some old established countries from around the world suddenly announce that they recognize 'Hispania' and will treat it as a new, independent country! Your statehood, your laws, your culture, your way of life have been stolen from under your noses with the blessing of the 'international community'!
Incredibly, this is what has happened in the former Yugoslavian republic of Serbia. Serbia is a fully fledged country in its own right. It has a very long and noble history dating right back to the middle ages. Yet a bunch of expatriate, Albanian gypsies have annexed part of it for their own exclusive use! If they were so proud of their Albanian roots they could have simply returned to Albania, you might think. But that's not what they've done. They are foreigners that don't even belong in the country, but they've sectioned off part of it exclusively for themselves and now require its original, historical inhabitants to submit to their rule!
The most important aspect of this development for us to remember here in the West is the countries who have chosen to support this move and the speed with which they have done so. Smells like a set-up? You bet. America, Britain, France, Germany. Four of the most Jew-dominated countries in the world, all hell-bent on forcing through the New World Order agenda. If you were a Texan and the Mexicans annexed it for themselves and Russia immediately rubber-stamped the change, you'd naturally be more than a little upset. Now perhaps we can see why the Serbians have burned the American flag.
Tuesday, February 19, 2008
Huxley Warned US: Part 4
See the preamble from Part 1 if you haven't already.
The joke of modern 'democracy'...
Aldous Huxley, Brave New World Revisited, 1958:
"In a capitalist democracy, such as the United States, [the entire economic process] is controlled by what Professor C. Wright Mills has called the 'Power Elite.' This Power Elite directly employs several millions of the country's work force in its factories, offices and stores, controls many millions more by lending them the money to buy its products and, through its ownership of the media of mass communication, influences the thoughts, the feelings and the actions of virtually everybody. To parody the words of Winston Churchill, never have so many been manipulated so much by so few. We are far indeed from Jefferson's ideal of a genuinely free society composed of a hierarchy of self governing units - 'the elementary republics of the wards, the county republics, the State republics and the Republic of the Union, forming a gradation of authorities.'
"We see, then, that modern technology has led to the concentration of economic and political power, and to the development of a society controlled (ruthlessly in the totalitarian states, politely and inconspicuously in the democracies) by Big Business and Big Government. But societies are composed of individuals and are good only in so far as they help individuals to realize their potentialities and to lead a happy and fruitful life. How have individuals been affected by the technological advances of recent years? Here is the answer to this question given by a philosopher-psychiatrist, Dr Erich Fromm: 'Our contemporary Western society, in spite of its material, intellectual and political progress, is increasingly less conducive to mental health, and tends to undermine the inner security, happiness, reason and the capacity for love in the individual; it tends to turn him into an automaton who pays for his human failure with increasing mental sickness, and with despair hidden under a frantic drive for work and so-called pleasure.' "
Well, nothing much has changed in the intervening 50 years, we can plainly see - save perhaps the intensity of this on-going manipulation.
Huxley correctly identifies that Big Government and Big Business are working hand-in-hand in a manner that brings nothing but ill for the broad mass of the population. Though purportedly working in OUR best interests, it is increasingly clear, even to those of little perception, that the government is doing quite the opposite and this outrageous state of affairs has been the norm for very many decades. Yet every few years, we shuffle like battery chickens into the polling booths in the delusion that our wishes and needs count for anything. We are simply rubber-stamping the authority of enemies who would happily throw our children into the jaws of ravenous wolves if it served their purposes. No one gets nominated for a shot at the presidency who isn't already pre-approved for the post by Jewish-controlled entities. Come November, we will be presented with the usual choice: a candidate who is slavishly pro-Israel (Obama) or one who is actively so (McCain). Either way, WE THE PEOPLE (for whom it's all supposed to be about) LOSE. Our democracy has been stolen. We get the last word; the final say; but it's meaningless because whoever wins, it's only ever another sock-puppet of Israel - then it's swiftly back to business as usual.
The joke of modern 'democracy'...
Aldous Huxley, Brave New World Revisited, 1958:
"In a capitalist democracy, such as the United States, [the entire economic process] is controlled by what Professor C. Wright Mills has called the 'Power Elite.' This Power Elite directly employs several millions of the country's work force in its factories, offices and stores, controls many millions more by lending them the money to buy its products and, through its ownership of the media of mass communication, influences the thoughts, the feelings and the actions of virtually everybody. To parody the words of Winston Churchill, never have so many been manipulated so much by so few. We are far indeed from Jefferson's ideal of a genuinely free society composed of a hierarchy of self governing units - 'the elementary republics of the wards, the county republics, the State republics and the Republic of the Union, forming a gradation of authorities.'
"We see, then, that modern technology has led to the concentration of economic and political power, and to the development of a society controlled (ruthlessly in the totalitarian states, politely and inconspicuously in the democracies) by Big Business and Big Government. But societies are composed of individuals and are good only in so far as they help individuals to realize their potentialities and to lead a happy and fruitful life. How have individuals been affected by the technological advances of recent years? Here is the answer to this question given by a philosopher-psychiatrist, Dr Erich Fromm: 'Our contemporary Western society, in spite of its material, intellectual and political progress, is increasingly less conducive to mental health, and tends to undermine the inner security, happiness, reason and the capacity for love in the individual; it tends to turn him into an automaton who pays for his human failure with increasing mental sickness, and with despair hidden under a frantic drive for work and so-called pleasure.' "
Well, nothing much has changed in the intervening 50 years, we can plainly see - save perhaps the intensity of this on-going manipulation.
Huxley correctly identifies that Big Government and Big Business are working hand-in-hand in a manner that brings nothing but ill for the broad mass of the population. Though purportedly working in OUR best interests, it is increasingly clear, even to those of little perception, that the government is doing quite the opposite and this outrageous state of affairs has been the norm for very many decades. Yet every few years, we shuffle like battery chickens into the polling booths in the delusion that our wishes and needs count for anything. We are simply rubber-stamping the authority of enemies who would happily throw our children into the jaws of ravenous wolves if it served their purposes. No one gets nominated for a shot at the presidency who isn't already pre-approved for the post by Jewish-controlled entities. Come November, we will be presented with the usual choice: a candidate who is slavishly pro-Israel (Obama) or one who is actively so (McCain). Either way, WE THE PEOPLE (for whom it's all supposed to be about) LOSE. Our democracy has been stolen. We get the last word; the final say; but it's meaningless because whoever wins, it's only ever another sock-puppet of Israel - then it's swiftly back to business as usual.
Monday, February 18, 2008
Television Kills
HOW TV IS (quite literally) KILLING US
(First published in the London Daily Mail, October 2005)
by Dr Aric Sigman
The studio audience is chanting as the two women - a wife and a
mistress - square up to each other over an errant husband. 'Bitch or
whore? Bitch or whore? Bitch or whore?' the crowd shouts. Then, in a
new expression of on-air hostility, the two rivals strip naked and
scream obscenities before lunging at each other like two 16-stone
animals, trading punches. The rhapsodic chanting reaches a crescendo.
It has been another good day for the Jerry Springer television show.
Thousands of miles away from that Chicago TV studio, in the seaside
town of Hastings in England, I remembered that episode as I stood in
Queen's Arcade at the entrance to the attic where John Logie Baird, the
inventor of the world's first 'seeing by wireless machine,' conducted
his early experiments.
Struggling for years to convince a sceptical world that his creation
was significant, it was here Baird wrote in his draft autobiography
that what drove him on was the sense that 'he was doing something
worthwhile'.
He never finished the book nor lived to see what his invention of
television would become.
What, I wondered, would Baird make of TV now? What would he think of
Jerry Springer's jeering mob? What would he make of television becoming
more popular than shopping or going to the pub, church or library
combined?
Or that more people would vote in a TV contest (Pop Idol) than for the
Prime Minister and his entire party at the last election?
More pertinently, would he ever believe that his remarkable invention
would come to represent one of the greatest dangers to the health of
Britain and its social wellbeing at the dawn of the 21st century?
I've recently compiled a report on the serious risks associated with
watching the amount of television we do. I've analysed a wide range of
scientific studies from government agencies across the world, from the
Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, to The Royal College
of Psychiatrists, The American Medical Association, National Academy
of Sciences, and Harvard and Stanford medical schools.
I've spent months poring over articles in journals ranging from The
Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine to Nature and Journal of
Neuroscience.
The picture I formed was profoundly disturbing and amounts to what I
believe to be the greatest health scandal of our time. I learned that
viewing even moderate amounts of television:
May damage brain cell development and function.
Is the only adult pastime from the ages of 20 to 60
positively linked to developing Alzheimer's disease.
Is a direct cause of obesity - a bigger factor even than
eating junk food or taking too little exercise.
Significantly increases the risk of Type 2 diabetes.
May biologically trigger premature puberty.
Leads to a significantly elevated risk of sleep problems in
adulthood, causing hormone changes which in turn increase body fat
production and appetite, damages the immune system and may lead to a
greater vulnerability to cancer.
Is a major independent cause of clinical depression (of which
Britain has the highest rate in Europe).
These are not wild suppositions: they are based on hard, clinical
evidence that has lain buried in academic journals. For example, scientists at the University of Washington studied 2,500
children and found a strong link between early television exposure and
attention problems by age seven which was 'consistent with a diagnosis
of ADHD'.
For every hour of television a child watches a day, they noted a nine
per cent increase in attentional damage.
Equally shocking was the report in the medical journal Pediatrics which
studied the metabolic rates of 31 children while undertaking a variety
of activities and found that when they watched TV, the children burned
the equivalent of 211 calories fewer per day than if they did
absolutely nothing.
The authors concluded that 'television viewing has a fairly profound
lowering effect of metabolic rate', with all of the health risks that
entails.
More subtle, but no less pernicious, were the results I found when I
traveled the world to research how remote cultures have been affected
by the recent arrival of television. By studying these societies, I
was, in effect, going back in time to see how our own society might
have been shaped by television.
In Bhutan - the last country on earth to introduce TV - I was
appalled to discover that since the arrival of 46 cable channels, the
country was experiencing its first serious crime wave. Greed, avarice
and selfishness had replaced traditional values of peace and respect.
Bhutanese academics had con-ducted a study which showed how television
was to blame for increasing crime, corruption and dramatically changing
attitudes to relationships.
They were particularly appalled to discover that more than a third of
parents now preferred to watch television than talk to their own
children.
I found similar problems when I traveled to Vava'u in Tonga, where I
interviewed Police Chief Inspector Ashley Fua. He told me that since
the arrival of American TV shows and DVDs on his island, crime among
young men had soared.
The problem, he told me, was that until now, there had been no need for
juvenile courts, jails or a criminal justice system. The police were
suddenly having to cope with a crime wave for which they were not
prepared.
Of course, no one is suggesting that all of Britain's social problems
are ascribed to our love of television. But at the very least, these
findings should give us pause to question whether the sheer amount of
television we consume is a force for ill.
Consider the facts. By the age of 75, most of us will have spent more
than twelve-and-a-half years of 24-hour days watching television. It
has become the industrialised world's main activity, taking up more of
our time than any other single activity except work and sleep.
Children now spend more time watching a television screen than they
spend in school. At this very moment, the average six-year-old will
have already watched television for nearly one full year of their
lives.
When other screen-based viewing, such as computer games, is included,
the figure is far higher. Children aged 11 to 15 now spend 53 hours a
week watching TV and computers - an increase of 40 per cent in a
decade.
The health implications for our children are particularly worrying with
the finding that television viewing among children under three seems to
damage their future learning abilities - permanently.
Scientists report 'deleterious effects' on mathematical ability,
reading recognition and comprehension in later childhood.
It's not simply that watching so much television means that children
are not undertaking more stimulating play activities, it is suspected
that the audiovisual output from TV is actually damaging the child's
rapidly developing brain.
The statistics bear this out. Children who have televisions in their
bedrooms at ages eight and nine score worst in school achievement
tests. And a 26-year study, tracking children from birth, has just
concluded 'television viewing in childhood and adolescence is
associated with poor educational achievement by 26 years of age.
[And] may have long-lasting, adverse consequences for educational
achievement and subsequent socio-economic status and wellbeing'.
The doctors found a direct correlation between the amount of television
children watch and the degree of educational damage they suffer.
Significant long-term damage occurs even at so-called 'modest levels'
of viewing - between one and two hours a day.
Confronted with such evidence, I would argue that reducing our screen
time must now be a health priority.
However, because television isn't an intoxicant or a visibly dangerous
activity, it has eluded the warnings that have befallen other health
issues.
Of course, life isn't always about following the safest course of
action. Whether it's sunbathing, drinking alcohol, smoking or eating
junk food, we enjoy lots of things that are, after a certain point, bad
for us or for the rest of society.
That's precisely why governments have recognised the need for concepts
such as recommended units of alcohol, sun-cream SPP factors, safe
cholesterol levels and stark health warnings on cigarette packets.
And yet when it comes to the dramatic and dangerous effects that
watching too much television can have on our health and social
wellbeing, the Government has turned a blind eye.
This issue has gone unheard during the political party conference
season. In its latest White Paper, proposing radical measures to
improve the health of the nation, the Government whitewashes the role
of television into oblivion.
In fact, far from addressing this issue, ministers support building
more giant outdoor television screens as permanent forms of
architecture in city centres.
Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott recently stated these 'Big
screens... could become social hubs for city centres just like village
greens of the past'.
And Culture Secretary Tessa Jowell believes the public must 'learn to
watch TV in order to increase 'media literacy', which she believes
'will become as important a skill as maths or science ... a nation of
active and informed consumers'.
Paced with such blinkered optimism, it is unlikely that the Government
has the political will to issue warnings about TV overload.
Ultimately, people will have to decide for themselves how much and what
type of television they and their children watch - but they must now
be made aware that there is a dark side to John Logic Baird's 'seeing
by wireless' machine.
At present, that awareness is being hindered by nothing short of a
motivated negligence on the part of academics, politicians and media
with financial links to television - all reminiscent of how the
tobacco industry managed for years to claim that smoking was an
enjoy-able activity that had no proven ill effect on the nation's
health.
Even those who advise a 'better-safe-than-sorry' approach are
predictably referred to as alarmist or over-reacting, while official
health watchdogs dispense platitudes such as 'moderation is the key' or
'parents need to strike a balance'.
We need to start asking what 'moderation' and 'balance' actually mean
when they apply to our children's health.
The next time you are told the harmful effects of watching television
apply only to those who spend 'excessive' amounts of time in front of
the box, remember that 'excessive' often means only two hours a day -
far below the national average.
But perhaps the biggest obstacle in the way of facing up to the
dangerous long-term effects of television is the simple fact that we
enjoy watching it.
We are deaf to the warnings because we do not want to hear them. We are too busy watching EastEnders, Midsomer Murders, Countdown or even - heaven help us - Jerry Springer to care.
It was Aldous Huxley who warned us of a world where man's almost
infinite appetite for distractions is used to control him by, in
effect, inflicting pleasure. Huxley feared that what we love will ruin
us. Today, our growing dependency on television means that at the dawn of the 21st century, Huxley's nightmare is becoming a reality.
(First published in the London Daily Mail, October 2005)
by Dr Aric Sigman
The studio audience is chanting as the two women - a wife and a
mistress - square up to each other over an errant husband. 'Bitch or
whore? Bitch or whore? Bitch or whore?' the crowd shouts. Then, in a
new expression of on-air hostility, the two rivals strip naked and
scream obscenities before lunging at each other like two 16-stone
animals, trading punches. The rhapsodic chanting reaches a crescendo.
It has been another good day for the Jerry Springer television show.
Thousands of miles away from that Chicago TV studio, in the seaside
town of Hastings in England, I remembered that episode as I stood in
Queen's Arcade at the entrance to the attic where John Logie Baird, the
inventor of the world's first 'seeing by wireless machine,' conducted
his early experiments.
Struggling for years to convince a sceptical world that his creation
was significant, it was here Baird wrote in his draft autobiography
that what drove him on was the sense that 'he was doing something
worthwhile'.
He never finished the book nor lived to see what his invention of
television would become.
What, I wondered, would Baird make of TV now? What would he think of
Jerry Springer's jeering mob? What would he make of television becoming
more popular than shopping or going to the pub, church or library
combined?
Or that more people would vote in a TV contest (Pop Idol) than for the
Prime Minister and his entire party at the last election?
More pertinently, would he ever believe that his remarkable invention
would come to represent one of the greatest dangers to the health of
Britain and its social wellbeing at the dawn of the 21st century?
I've recently compiled a report on the serious risks associated with
watching the amount of television we do. I've analysed a wide range of
scientific studies from government agencies across the world, from the
Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, to The Royal College
of Psychiatrists, The American Medical Association, National Academy
of Sciences, and Harvard and Stanford medical schools.
I've spent months poring over articles in journals ranging from The
Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine to Nature and Journal of
Neuroscience.
The picture I formed was profoundly disturbing and amounts to what I
believe to be the greatest health scandal of our time. I learned that
viewing even moderate amounts of television:
May damage brain cell development and function.
Is the only adult pastime from the ages of 20 to 60
positively linked to developing Alzheimer's disease.
Is a direct cause of obesity - a bigger factor even than
eating junk food or taking too little exercise.
Significantly increases the risk of Type 2 diabetes.
May biologically trigger premature puberty.
Leads to a significantly elevated risk of sleep problems in
adulthood, causing hormone changes which in turn increase body fat
production and appetite, damages the immune system and may lead to a
greater vulnerability to cancer.
Is a major independent cause of clinical depression (of which
Britain has the highest rate in Europe).
These are not wild suppositions: they are based on hard, clinical
evidence that has lain buried in academic journals. For example, scientists at the University of Washington studied 2,500
children and found a strong link between early television exposure and
attention problems by age seven which was 'consistent with a diagnosis
of ADHD'.
For every hour of television a child watches a day, they noted a nine
per cent increase in attentional damage.
Equally shocking was the report in the medical journal Pediatrics which
studied the metabolic rates of 31 children while undertaking a variety
of activities and found that when they watched TV, the children burned
the equivalent of 211 calories fewer per day than if they did
absolutely nothing.
The authors concluded that 'television viewing has a fairly profound
lowering effect of metabolic rate', with all of the health risks that
entails.
More subtle, but no less pernicious, were the results I found when I
traveled the world to research how remote cultures have been affected
by the recent arrival of television. By studying these societies, I
was, in effect, going back in time to see how our own society might
have been shaped by television.
In Bhutan - the last country on earth to introduce TV - I was
appalled to discover that since the arrival of 46 cable channels, the
country was experiencing its first serious crime wave. Greed, avarice
and selfishness had replaced traditional values of peace and respect.
Bhutanese academics had con-ducted a study which showed how television
was to blame for increasing crime, corruption and dramatically changing
attitudes to relationships.
They were particularly appalled to discover that more than a third of
parents now preferred to watch television than talk to their own
children.
I found similar problems when I traveled to Vava'u in Tonga, where I
interviewed Police Chief Inspector Ashley Fua. He told me that since
the arrival of American TV shows and DVDs on his island, crime among
young men had soared.
The problem, he told me, was that until now, there had been no need for
juvenile courts, jails or a criminal justice system. The police were
suddenly having to cope with a crime wave for which they were not
prepared.
Of course, no one is suggesting that all of Britain's social problems
are ascribed to our love of television. But at the very least, these
findings should give us pause to question whether the sheer amount of
television we consume is a force for ill.
Consider the facts. By the age of 75, most of us will have spent more
than twelve-and-a-half years of 24-hour days watching television. It
has become the industrialised world's main activity, taking up more of
our time than any other single activity except work and sleep.
Children now spend more time watching a television screen than they
spend in school. At this very moment, the average six-year-old will
have already watched television for nearly one full year of their
lives.
When other screen-based viewing, such as computer games, is included,
the figure is far higher. Children aged 11 to 15 now spend 53 hours a
week watching TV and computers - an increase of 40 per cent in a
decade.
The health implications for our children are particularly worrying with
the finding that television viewing among children under three seems to
damage their future learning abilities - permanently.
Scientists report 'deleterious effects' on mathematical ability,
reading recognition and comprehension in later childhood.
It's not simply that watching so much television means that children
are not undertaking more stimulating play activities, it is suspected
that the audiovisual output from TV is actually damaging the child's
rapidly developing brain.
The statistics bear this out. Children who have televisions in their
bedrooms at ages eight and nine score worst in school achievement
tests. And a 26-year study, tracking children from birth, has just
concluded 'television viewing in childhood and adolescence is
associated with poor educational achievement by 26 years of age.
[And] may have long-lasting, adverse consequences for educational
achievement and subsequent socio-economic status and wellbeing'.
The doctors found a direct correlation between the amount of television
children watch and the degree of educational damage they suffer.
Significant long-term damage occurs even at so-called 'modest levels'
of viewing - between one and two hours a day.
Confronted with such evidence, I would argue that reducing our screen
time must now be a health priority.
However, because television isn't an intoxicant or a visibly dangerous
activity, it has eluded the warnings that have befallen other health
issues.
Of course, life isn't always about following the safest course of
action. Whether it's sunbathing, drinking alcohol, smoking or eating
junk food, we enjoy lots of things that are, after a certain point, bad
for us or for the rest of society.
That's precisely why governments have recognised the need for concepts
such as recommended units of alcohol, sun-cream SPP factors, safe
cholesterol levels and stark health warnings on cigarette packets.
And yet when it comes to the dramatic and dangerous effects that
watching too much television can have on our health and social
wellbeing, the Government has turned a blind eye.
This issue has gone unheard during the political party conference
season. In its latest White Paper, proposing radical measures to
improve the health of the nation, the Government whitewashes the role
of television into oblivion.
In fact, far from addressing this issue, ministers support building
more giant outdoor television screens as permanent forms of
architecture in city centres.
Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott recently stated these 'Big
screens... could become social hubs for city centres just like village
greens of the past'.
And Culture Secretary Tessa Jowell believes the public must 'learn to
watch TV in order to increase 'media literacy', which she believes
'will become as important a skill as maths or science ... a nation of
active and informed consumers'.
Paced with such blinkered optimism, it is unlikely that the Government
has the political will to issue warnings about TV overload.
Ultimately, people will have to decide for themselves how much and what
type of television they and their children watch - but they must now
be made aware that there is a dark side to John Logic Baird's 'seeing
by wireless' machine.
At present, that awareness is being hindered by nothing short of a
motivated negligence on the part of academics, politicians and media
with financial links to television - all reminiscent of how the
tobacco industry managed for years to claim that smoking was an
enjoy-able activity that had no proven ill effect on the nation's
health.
Even those who advise a 'better-safe-than-sorry' approach are
predictably referred to as alarmist or over-reacting, while official
health watchdogs dispense platitudes such as 'moderation is the key' or
'parents need to strike a balance'.
We need to start asking what 'moderation' and 'balance' actually mean
when they apply to our children's health.
The next time you are told the harmful effects of watching television
apply only to those who spend 'excessive' amounts of time in front of
the box, remember that 'excessive' often means only two hours a day -
far below the national average.
But perhaps the biggest obstacle in the way of facing up to the
dangerous long-term effects of television is the simple fact that we
enjoy watching it.
We are deaf to the warnings because we do not want to hear them. We are too busy watching EastEnders, Midsomer Murders, Countdown or even - heaven help us - Jerry Springer to care.
It was Aldous Huxley who warned us of a world where man's almost
infinite appetite for distractions is used to control him by, in
effect, inflicting pleasure. Huxley feared that what we love will ruin
us. Today, our growing dependency on television means that at the dawn of the 21st century, Huxley's nightmare is becoming a reality.
Huxley Warned Us: Part 3
(see first introductory preamble from Part 1)
In this 3rd part of this series on the predictions of Aldous Huxley, the great visionary bemoans the fact that in our increasingly overpopulated world, the people who constitute the principal component of the problem by producing the most children who will themselves go on to reproduce prodigiously; propagate poor quality genetic material and turn out huge numbers of biologically-inferior offspring. One can safely infer here that Huxley is referring to the Negro races. When you read the text below it leaves little room for doubt, in fact.
Common sense observations like this could be made freely 50 years ago at the time Huxley was writing, but just imagine the difficulty a professional person would encounter in re-iterating these simple truths today. They'd be branded as a Nazi or a eugenicist and God only knows what else. The result has been that the issue of differential breeding rates between the races and the population explosion cannot even be discussed! A time-bomb is ticking away that could eventually destroy the planet, yet political-correctness dictates we must remain silent on this, one of the most pressing of current issues.
Huxley, 1958:
"In the second half of the twentieth century, we do nothing systematic about our breeding; but in our random and unregulated way, we are not only overpopulating the planet, we are also, it would seem, making sure that these greater numbers shall be of biologically poorer quality. In the bad old days children with considerable, or even slight, hereditary defects rarely survived. Today, thanks to sanitation, modern pharmacology and the social conscience, most of the children born with hereditary defects reach maturity and multiply their kind. Under the conditions now prevailing, every advance in medicine will tend to be offset by a corresponding advance in the survival rates of individuals cursed by some genetic insufficiency. In spite of new wonder drugs and better treatment (indeed, in a certain sense, precisely because of these things), the physical health of the general population will show no improvement, and may even deteriorate. And along with a decline in average healthiness there may well go a decline in average intelligence. Indeed, some competent authorities are convinced that such a decline has already taken place and is continuing. 'Under conditions that are both soft and unregulated,' writes Dr W.H. Sheldon, 'our best stock tends to be out-bred by stock that is inferior to it in every respect ... It is the fashion in some academic circles to assure students that the alarm over differential birth-rates is unfounded; that these problems are merely economic, or merely educational, or merely religious, or merely cultural or something of the sort. This is Pollyanna optimism. Reproductive delinquency is biological and basic.' And he adds that 'nobody knows just how far the average IQ in this country (the USA) has declined since 1916, when Terman attempted to standardize the meaning of IQ 100."
In Phaedrus' opinion, the scientists who sit down and systematically analyze the result of various studies and reach conclusions which they KNOW will not be well received, must proclaim them honestly and fearlessly nevertheless. Not to do so would be a crime against Truth and another victory for the shadowy plotters behind the New World Order, AKA Jewish global domination and our continued, collective enslavement.
In this 3rd part of this series on the predictions of Aldous Huxley, the great visionary bemoans the fact that in our increasingly overpopulated world, the people who constitute the principal component of the problem by producing the most children who will themselves go on to reproduce prodigiously; propagate poor quality genetic material and turn out huge numbers of biologically-inferior offspring. One can safely infer here that Huxley is referring to the Negro races. When you read the text below it leaves little room for doubt, in fact.
Common sense observations like this could be made freely 50 years ago at the time Huxley was writing, but just imagine the difficulty a professional person would encounter in re-iterating these simple truths today. They'd be branded as a Nazi or a eugenicist and God only knows what else. The result has been that the issue of differential breeding rates between the races and the population explosion cannot even be discussed! A time-bomb is ticking away that could eventually destroy the planet, yet political-correctness dictates we must remain silent on this, one of the most pressing of current issues.
Huxley, 1958:
"In the second half of the twentieth century, we do nothing systematic about our breeding; but in our random and unregulated way, we are not only overpopulating the planet, we are also, it would seem, making sure that these greater numbers shall be of biologically poorer quality. In the bad old days children with considerable, or even slight, hereditary defects rarely survived. Today, thanks to sanitation, modern pharmacology and the social conscience, most of the children born with hereditary defects reach maturity and multiply their kind. Under the conditions now prevailing, every advance in medicine will tend to be offset by a corresponding advance in the survival rates of individuals cursed by some genetic insufficiency. In spite of new wonder drugs and better treatment (indeed, in a certain sense, precisely because of these things), the physical health of the general population will show no improvement, and may even deteriorate. And along with a decline in average healthiness there may well go a decline in average intelligence. Indeed, some competent authorities are convinced that such a decline has already taken place and is continuing. 'Under conditions that are both soft and unregulated,' writes Dr W.H. Sheldon, 'our best stock tends to be out-bred by stock that is inferior to it in every respect ... It is the fashion in some academic circles to assure students that the alarm over differential birth-rates is unfounded; that these problems are merely economic, or merely educational, or merely religious, or merely cultural or something of the sort. This is Pollyanna optimism. Reproductive delinquency is biological and basic.' And he adds that 'nobody knows just how far the average IQ in this country (the USA) has declined since 1916, when Terman attempted to standardize the meaning of IQ 100."
In Phaedrus' opinion, the scientists who sit down and systematically analyze the result of various studies and reach conclusions which they KNOW will not be well received, must proclaim them honestly and fearlessly nevertheless. Not to do so would be a crime against Truth and another victory for the shadowy plotters behind the New World Order, AKA Jewish global domination and our continued, collective enslavement.
Friday, February 15, 2008
Huxley Warned Us: Part 2
Second in the series; to be read in conjunction with Phaedrus' Preamble of Part 1 published here on February 13.
Aldous Huxley:
"...Meanwhile impersonal forces over which we have almost no control seem to be pushing us all in the direction of the Brave New Worldian nightmare; and this impersonal pushing is being consciously accelerated by representatives of commercial and political organizations who have developed a number of new techniques for manipulating, in the interests of SOME MINORITY [my emphasis] the thoughts and feelings of the masses. The techniques of manipulation will be discussed in later chapters.
"For the moment let us confine our attentions to those impersonal forces which are now making the world so extremely unsafe for democracy, so very inhospitable to individual freedom. What are these forces? And why has the nightmare which I had projected into the [26th century], made so swift an advance in our direction? The answer to these questions must begin where the life of even the most highly civilized society has its beginnings - on the level of biology.
"On the first Christmas Day the population of our planet was about two hundred and fifty millions - less than half the population of modern China. Sixteen centuries later, when the Pilgrim Fathers landed at Plymouth Rock, human numbers had climbed to a little more than five hundred millions. By the time of the signing of the Declaration of Independence, world population had passed the seven hundred million mark. In 1931, when I was writing Brave New World, it stood at just under two billions. Today, only twenty-seven years later, there are two thousand eight hundred million of us. And tomorrow – what?"
Huxley's "tomorrow" is of course our today. And the current population of the world is (if I recall correctly) approximately six-and-a-half BILLION! In his sequel to Brave New World, Huxley goes on to describe how better and better drug treatments and cleaner water supplies and more effective disinfectants will only exacerbate the problem of gross human overpopulation (we'll see in detail what he has to say about this later). So when we read the widely-circulated reports about the agents of the New World Order planning to wipe out over 4 billion of us, perhaps we can see that there's some method in the madness, even though some of us reading these lines may be among the masses to be eliminated. Quite what the selection criteria for this future Cull comprise one can only speculate, as myself and others have done elsewhere.
However the fact remains that the world IS grossly overpopulated and far more precariously so now than when the aging Huxley observed it in 1958. In fact we are just starting to see now the onset of widespread food shortages he predicted elsewhere in BNWR. This has shown up in recent steeply rising food prices world-wide, and shortages of basic staples in places such as Africa and the far east. The author is also quite correct to refer to these mysterious forces as "impersonal" - for those behind them care not one jot about you or I, but only their own survival and enrichment. As we saw in Part 1, we have to wake up to the fact that our so-called 'leaders' are in fact our REAL enemies, and far more dangerous than any creation from their feverish collective imagination that they might, from time to time, conjure up to threaten us with.
Finally, note Huxley's supposed use of the term "some minority" in the first paragraph. I think we can all guess to whom he is referring here and I believe it is unlikely (having read much of the man) that he was quite so diplomatic in this original manuscript. However, the text we are studying here is sourced from the Random House edition of BNWR - and like most other publishing houses, Random House is totally owned and controlled by the Jews. I believe therefore that the temptation to tone down the original text was probably too much for them. Heaven knows how many other original manuscripts have been given the same treatment in the course of history in order to stifle the warnings they contain.
Aldous Huxley:
"...Meanwhile impersonal forces over which we have almost no control seem to be pushing us all in the direction of the Brave New Worldian nightmare; and this impersonal pushing is being consciously accelerated by representatives of commercial and political organizations who have developed a number of new techniques for manipulating, in the interests of SOME MINORITY [my emphasis] the thoughts and feelings of the masses. The techniques of manipulation will be discussed in later chapters.
"For the moment let us confine our attentions to those impersonal forces which are now making the world so extremely unsafe for democracy, so very inhospitable to individual freedom. What are these forces? And why has the nightmare which I had projected into the [26th century], made so swift an advance in our direction? The answer to these questions must begin where the life of even the most highly civilized society has its beginnings - on the level of biology.
"On the first Christmas Day the population of our planet was about two hundred and fifty millions - less than half the population of modern China. Sixteen centuries later, when the Pilgrim Fathers landed at Plymouth Rock, human numbers had climbed to a little more than five hundred millions. By the time of the signing of the Declaration of Independence, world population had passed the seven hundred million mark. In 1931, when I was writing Brave New World, it stood at just under two billions. Today, only twenty-seven years later, there are two thousand eight hundred million of us. And tomorrow – what?"
Huxley's "tomorrow" is of course our today. And the current population of the world is (if I recall correctly) approximately six-and-a-half BILLION! In his sequel to Brave New World, Huxley goes on to describe how better and better drug treatments and cleaner water supplies and more effective disinfectants will only exacerbate the problem of gross human overpopulation (we'll see in detail what he has to say about this later). So when we read the widely-circulated reports about the agents of the New World Order planning to wipe out over 4 billion of us, perhaps we can see that there's some method in the madness, even though some of us reading these lines may be among the masses to be eliminated. Quite what the selection criteria for this future Cull comprise one can only speculate, as myself and others have done elsewhere.
However the fact remains that the world IS grossly overpopulated and far more precariously so now than when the aging Huxley observed it in 1958. In fact we are just starting to see now the onset of widespread food shortages he predicted elsewhere in BNWR. This has shown up in recent steeply rising food prices world-wide, and shortages of basic staples in places such as Africa and the far east. The author is also quite correct to refer to these mysterious forces as "impersonal" - for those behind them care not one jot about you or I, but only their own survival and enrichment. As we saw in Part 1, we have to wake up to the fact that our so-called 'leaders' are in fact our REAL enemies, and far more dangerous than any creation from their feverish collective imagination that they might, from time to time, conjure up to threaten us with.
Finally, note Huxley's supposed use of the term "some minority" in the first paragraph. I think we can all guess to whom he is referring here and I believe it is unlikely (having read much of the man) that he was quite so diplomatic in this original manuscript. However, the text we are studying here is sourced from the Random House edition of BNWR - and like most other publishing houses, Random House is totally owned and controlled by the Jews. I believe therefore that the temptation to tone down the original text was probably too much for them. Heaven knows how many other original manuscripts have been given the same treatment in the course of history in order to stifle the warnings they contain.
The Bible According to Phaedrus
"For there will be much pissing, whining, moaning, bitching and gnashing of fangs."
Whenever I trawl through the Jews' Old Testament - you know, the one they're always trying to pass off as being equally valid for Christians - I can't help but be astonished by the number of times their own God despairs of them. It's a recurrent theme throughout the entire volume. Again and again and again the Children of Israel stray from the teachings of their God, they break the Commandments, they consort with the unclean Goyim, they feel a pull towards alien deities and they neglect their devotions and the teachings of their own prophets.
So their God understandably gets mad about this and sends a series of misfortunes their way. He "sets his face against them" and brings about all manner of tribulations to try to get them to see sense and return to the fold. Finally, when all seems lost, the Children of Israel see the error of their ways and seek peace with their God. They fall to their knees and beg, grovel (and probably bitch, whine, piss and moan) for forgiveness. God is so moved by their pathetic pleas for mercy that he lets them off and the whole process starts over again. And again and again and again!
It really becomes quite farcical. Christians, of course, don't need to know any of this stuff. But we get it nevertheless because it serves the interests of Zionism. This is one reason why it's so difficult to buy the Gospels alone. Anyway, the above cycle is described as going on for many generations. On one occasion, outlined in Ezekiel, God is so fed up trying to woo back his 'Children' that he resorts to conscripting a Gentile to plead with them on his behalf! Now how embarrassing must that have been! But that's the Jews, I guess. The majority are naturally inclined to stray and are typically very stubborn. "For they are a rebellious House." - as their God describes them.
Whenever I trawl through the Jews' Old Testament - you know, the one they're always trying to pass off as being equally valid for Christians - I can't help but be astonished by the number of times their own God despairs of them. It's a recurrent theme throughout the entire volume. Again and again and again the Children of Israel stray from the teachings of their God, they break the Commandments, they consort with the unclean Goyim, they feel a pull towards alien deities and they neglect their devotions and the teachings of their own prophets.
So their God understandably gets mad about this and sends a series of misfortunes their way. He "sets his face against them" and brings about all manner of tribulations to try to get them to see sense and return to the fold. Finally, when all seems lost, the Children of Israel see the error of their ways and seek peace with their God. They fall to their knees and beg, grovel (and probably bitch, whine, piss and moan) for forgiveness. God is so moved by their pathetic pleas for mercy that he lets them off and the whole process starts over again. And again and again and again!
It really becomes quite farcical. Christians, of course, don't need to know any of this stuff. But we get it nevertheless because it serves the interests of Zionism. This is one reason why it's so difficult to buy the Gospels alone. Anyway, the above cycle is described as going on for many generations. On one occasion, outlined in Ezekiel, God is so fed up trying to woo back his 'Children' that he resorts to conscripting a Gentile to plead with them on his behalf! Now how embarrassing must that have been! But that's the Jews, I guess. The majority are naturally inclined to stray and are typically very stubborn. "For they are a rebellious House." - as their God describes them.
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
Huxley Warned Us: part 1
Preamble:
Aldous Huxley was one of the most outstanding visionaries of the 20th century. His predictions of the direction in which the world was heading have since been proven to be breathtakingly accurate. In 1932 Huxley penned his seminal masterpiece, 'Brave New World' - a novel depiction of a 'dystopian utopia' where the vast majority of the world's populace were genetically and socially-engineered slaves who labored quite contentedly in their ignorance, under the direction of a class of persons described as 'World Controllers' - an unelected elite who kept their underlings in willful subjugation via a combination of relentless subliminal propaganda, free sex, mindless, meaningless, undemanding entertainment and the distribution of a rewarding, 'feel-good' psychotropic drug.
This futuristic novel was set in the in the 26th century, by which time Huxley envisioned his predictions would most likely become reality. However, alarmed by the speed at which the dystopia he had described was coming to fruition, he was forced to accept that the likely arrival of Brave New World (for real) would in fact be much, much sooner than he had ever imagined. In1958 he wrote a sequel entitled: 'Brave New World Revisited'. In this reflective and recondite essay, he held up his prophecies to the transparent scrutiny afforded by the intervening 26 years of socio-political change. He concluded, much to his despair, that the nightmare world he had foreseen in the distant future was in reality "only just around the corner."
Now, fast-forward a further 50 years to 2008. Phaedrus herewith examines a series of extracts from Huxley's 1958 sequel to see exactly how far down the road to outright totalitarianism and slavish subservience we have traveled. The conclusions drawn are as alarming as one could possibly imagine and beg the questions: has a Brave New World been the agenda all along? Did Huxley merely PREDICT its inception? Or did he rather go no small way towards INSPIRING it? Perhaps some clues to this enigma will hopefully arise in the course of this series. Huxley wrote BNWR in the late 1950s - in a matter-of-fact style that was in those days refreshingly free from political-correctness. If you're queasy at the thought of Plain Truth, the best thing to do is shut down your computer and get back to Fox News. For everyone else, however, here we go with our first extract...
"...Omitted from the picture (not as being unimportant, but merely for convenience and because I have discussed them on earlier occasions) are the mechanical and military enemies of freedom - the weapons and gadgets which have so powerfully strengthened the hands of the world's rulers against their subjects, and the ever more ruinously costly preparations for ever more senseless and suicidal wars.
"The chapters that follow should be read against a background of thoughts about the Hungarian uprising and its repression, about the H-bombs, about the cost of what every nation refers to as 'defense', about those endless columns of uniformed boys, white, black, brown, yellow, marching obediently towards the common grave..."
Much of the above requires no elaboration, but it is interesting to note that Huxley refers to weapons and gadgets that have strengthened the hands of the world's rulers AGAINST (their own) subjects. How much more true is this today than it was 50 years ago? I think we can safely say the drive towards subjugating the world's populations has continued unabashed. Out of a combination of apathy and ignorance, we have permitted this process to be carried out against us. We COULD have stood up against it, but we didn't. We were warned. We have no excuses. And now the situation is worse than ever, and shows no sign of any immediate improvement. If Americans put McCain in the White House, then expect a Draft to follow shortly afterwards and we can once again kiss another generation of our kids goodbye. Someone once said (I believe it was Jefferson) that "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." Regrettably, that price is one that collectively we have been unwilling to pay. In failing in our duty to ourselves and our children, therefore, we have created a situation in which the only way back to peace and normality is through bloody revolution, for it certainly cannot be achieved through the ballot box, as we all now know only too well, when the only voice of common sense and reason, Ron Paul, was quietly silenced by the crooked, Jew-controlled mainstream media.
Aldous Huxley was one of the most outstanding visionaries of the 20th century. His predictions of the direction in which the world was heading have since been proven to be breathtakingly accurate. In 1932 Huxley penned his seminal masterpiece, 'Brave New World' - a novel depiction of a 'dystopian utopia' where the vast majority of the world's populace were genetically and socially-engineered slaves who labored quite contentedly in their ignorance, under the direction of a class of persons described as 'World Controllers' - an unelected elite who kept their underlings in willful subjugation via a combination of relentless subliminal propaganda, free sex, mindless, meaningless, undemanding entertainment and the distribution of a rewarding, 'feel-good' psychotropic drug.
This futuristic novel was set in the in the 26th century, by which time Huxley envisioned his predictions would most likely become reality. However, alarmed by the speed at which the dystopia he had described was coming to fruition, he was forced to accept that the likely arrival of Brave New World (for real) would in fact be much, much sooner than he had ever imagined. In1958 he wrote a sequel entitled: 'Brave New World Revisited'. In this reflective and recondite essay, he held up his prophecies to the transparent scrutiny afforded by the intervening 26 years of socio-political change. He concluded, much to his despair, that the nightmare world he had foreseen in the distant future was in reality "only just around the corner."
Now, fast-forward a further 50 years to 2008. Phaedrus herewith examines a series of extracts from Huxley's 1958 sequel to see exactly how far down the road to outright totalitarianism and slavish subservience we have traveled. The conclusions drawn are as alarming as one could possibly imagine and beg the questions: has a Brave New World been the agenda all along? Did Huxley merely PREDICT its inception? Or did he rather go no small way towards INSPIRING it? Perhaps some clues to this enigma will hopefully arise in the course of this series. Huxley wrote BNWR in the late 1950s - in a matter-of-fact style that was in those days refreshingly free from political-correctness. If you're queasy at the thought of Plain Truth, the best thing to do is shut down your computer and get back to Fox News. For everyone else, however, here we go with our first extract...
"...Omitted from the picture (not as being unimportant, but merely for convenience and because I have discussed them on earlier occasions) are the mechanical and military enemies of freedom - the weapons and gadgets which have so powerfully strengthened the hands of the world's rulers against their subjects, and the ever more ruinously costly preparations for ever more senseless and suicidal wars.
"The chapters that follow should be read against a background of thoughts about the Hungarian uprising and its repression, about the H-bombs, about the cost of what every nation refers to as 'defense', about those endless columns of uniformed boys, white, black, brown, yellow, marching obediently towards the common grave..."
Much of the above requires no elaboration, but it is interesting to note that Huxley refers to weapons and gadgets that have strengthened the hands of the world's rulers AGAINST (their own) subjects. How much more true is this today than it was 50 years ago? I think we can safely say the drive towards subjugating the world's populations has continued unabashed. Out of a combination of apathy and ignorance, we have permitted this process to be carried out against us. We COULD have stood up against it, but we didn't. We were warned. We have no excuses. And now the situation is worse than ever, and shows no sign of any immediate improvement. If Americans put McCain in the White House, then expect a Draft to follow shortly afterwards and we can once again kiss another generation of our kids goodbye. Someone once said (I believe it was Jefferson) that "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." Regrettably, that price is one that collectively we have been unwilling to pay. In failing in our duty to ourselves and our children, therefore, we have created a situation in which the only way back to peace and normality is through bloody revolution, for it certainly cannot be achieved through the ballot box, as we all now know only too well, when the only voice of common sense and reason, Ron Paul, was quietly silenced by the crooked, Jew-controlled mainstream media.
Tuesday, February 12, 2008
A Vote for McCain is a Vote for Conscription
Where else are the necessary troops going to come from? I don't see any of our so-called allies providing the numbers required for McCain's dream of War Without End.
Numbers, Numbers, Numbers
2,974: number of innocent people coldly sacrificed for the NWO in the World Trade Center towers on the 11th September 2001.
3,988: number of Jews unaccountably absent from their desks in the Center that day.
3,988: number of Jews unaccountably absent from their desks in the Center that day.
"Jews for Jesus" - "Christians for Satan"
There's a world-wide group that go around under the name of "Jews for Jesus" - a tag that should cause the eyebrows of the more healthily skeptic among us to conspicuously rise. Quite what they're up to and what their agenda is thankfully beyond the scope of this article and will not be examined here. Suffice it to say that ANY Jewish movement that propounds ANYTHING should be treated with the UTMOST suspicion, regardless of the ostensible righteousness of their stated aims.
Phaedrus is more preoccupied with their equally baffling counterparts who can accurately be dubbed 'Christians for Satan.' These are the poor, misguided fools who loudly maintain Jesus is Lord, but immerse themselves in the teachings of the Devil as propounded in much of the Old Testament - the series of books that were written exclusively by, and for, the Jews. It should come as no surprise that those who are foolish enough to "take up serpents" and believe that the Creation is the literal Truth are also dumb enough to buy into the Lie that God gave Palestine to the Jews in perpetuity for disfiguring the genitalia of their infant males.
Jesus denounced the Old Testament God as the "Devil" and the "Father of Lies" and the Jews themselves as "of their father, the Devil." Yet for an account of the words of this earlier, horned God we have only the hair-brained reportage of ancient and unaccountable Jewish scribes, who effectively chose THEMSELVES as the "Chosen People" upon which we are expected to rely. The word of ancient, anonymous, unaccountable members of the most renowned tribe of Liars would seem to be sufficient proof for otherwise perfectly good-hearted and sane Christians to embrace the doctrines of Satan. It's a no-brainer for most rational folks, yet still they seem to have gotten taken in by it. Christians almost without exception, it seems, have taken Jewish law as their own - when it most certainly isn't.
Take something as fundamentally Jewish as the Ten Commandments. Christians look upon these rules by which to live as if they were their own exclusive property. But there's a preamble in Moses' report of the account of his experience on Sinai which is curiously usually omitted: "I am the Lord your God who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery..." - as clear a reference as one could have that the Commandments were addressed to the Jews and no one else. The Jews themselves know this better than anyone and it must raise wry smiles among them when they hear the Goyim recite these edicts as if they applied equally to all.
It really wouldn't, or shouldn't matter. The Commandments are righteous enough and few would question their innate wisdom. Moral people the world over accept such diktats as common sense; only an unscrupulous race of duplicitous vipers like the Jews need to have them spelled out for them in tablets of stone. Yet they apply only between members of the Jewish faith. They were not addressed to Christians (obviously) and do not apply between Jew and Gentile. But most of us are unaware of this little fact - and many other little facts that present an unbridgeable dichotomy between Christianity and Judaism.
The blurring of the boundaries between the two religions only ever works in favor of the Jews. It is illusory. It helps to foster the false notion in Christian minds that the existence of Israel is God's Will and that those who support it will be blessed. But the truth is rather the reverse. There is far more in common between Christianity and Islam than ever there has been between Christianity and Judaism. But all the time this false perception endures and is constantly re-iterated, it richly serves the proponents of Zionism and ensures endless and unremitting bloody conflict, not only in the Middle East, but further afield in Europe and the United States as well. Please remember that Christianity is the very antithesis of everything Judaism stands for!
Phaedrus is more preoccupied with their equally baffling counterparts who can accurately be dubbed 'Christians for Satan.' These are the poor, misguided fools who loudly maintain Jesus is Lord, but immerse themselves in the teachings of the Devil as propounded in much of the Old Testament - the series of books that were written exclusively by, and for, the Jews. It should come as no surprise that those who are foolish enough to "take up serpents" and believe that the Creation is the literal Truth are also dumb enough to buy into the Lie that God gave Palestine to the Jews in perpetuity for disfiguring the genitalia of their infant males.
Jesus denounced the Old Testament God as the "Devil" and the "Father of Lies" and the Jews themselves as "of their father, the Devil." Yet for an account of the words of this earlier, horned God we have only the hair-brained reportage of ancient and unaccountable Jewish scribes, who effectively chose THEMSELVES as the "Chosen People" upon which we are expected to rely. The word of ancient, anonymous, unaccountable members of the most renowned tribe of Liars would seem to be sufficient proof for otherwise perfectly good-hearted and sane Christians to embrace the doctrines of Satan. It's a no-brainer for most rational folks, yet still they seem to have gotten taken in by it. Christians almost without exception, it seems, have taken Jewish law as their own - when it most certainly isn't.
Take something as fundamentally Jewish as the Ten Commandments. Christians look upon these rules by which to live as if they were their own exclusive property. But there's a preamble in Moses' report of the account of his experience on Sinai which is curiously usually omitted: "I am the Lord your God who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery..." - as clear a reference as one could have that the Commandments were addressed to the Jews and no one else. The Jews themselves know this better than anyone and it must raise wry smiles among them when they hear the Goyim recite these edicts as if they applied equally to all.
It really wouldn't, or shouldn't matter. The Commandments are righteous enough and few would question their innate wisdom. Moral people the world over accept such diktats as common sense; only an unscrupulous race of duplicitous vipers like the Jews need to have them spelled out for them in tablets of stone. Yet they apply only between members of the Jewish faith. They were not addressed to Christians (obviously) and do not apply between Jew and Gentile. But most of us are unaware of this little fact - and many other little facts that present an unbridgeable dichotomy between Christianity and Judaism.
The blurring of the boundaries between the two religions only ever works in favor of the Jews. It is illusory. It helps to foster the false notion in Christian minds that the existence of Israel is God's Will and that those who support it will be blessed. But the truth is rather the reverse. There is far more in common between Christianity and Islam than ever there has been between Christianity and Judaism. But all the time this false perception endures and is constantly re-iterated, it richly serves the proponents of Zionism and ensures endless and unremitting bloody conflict, not only in the Middle East, but further afield in Europe and the United States as well. Please remember that Christianity is the very antithesis of everything Judaism stands for!
Russia in Grave Danger
She is being encircled by the dark forces of the New World Order. She faces the gravest threat to her existence since JFK's ultimatum of 1962. Back then, she was the aggressor; today she's the innocent victim of a vicious bully. She must and will defend herself. She has no other choice! For the out-of-control juggernaut that is the NWO to roll out its twisted agenda, refractory Russia must be crushed. In consequence of this perverse aim, we ALL - every one of us in the West - face the prospect of not waking up tomorrow. Both sides - thanks to Bush - now assert the doctrine of preemptive, unprovoked nuclear strikes. This is the blackest time in the whole of history for world peace.
Friday, February 8, 2008
Coming Later this Month...
Starting next week, Phaedrus begins a brand new 14-part series of articles examining the prophesies of one of the greatest visionaries of the 20th century: Aldous Huxley. This far-sighted man warned us 50 years ago that we were headed to were we have now got. As a little commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the publication of 'Brave New World Revisited,' we'll be putting Huxley's uncannily-accurate predictions under the microscope. It will be a fascinating study, I can promise you that!
In the mean time, it's appropriate at this point to mention that there are four absolutely KEY books that everyone must read if they are to have any grasp at all on how we came to be in the state we now find ourselves in. These vitally-important works are 'Brave New World' and 'Brave New World Revisited,' by Huxley and 'Nineteen Eighty-Four' and 'Animal Farm' by George Orwell. If you haven't read these four AT LEAST, you cannot be a serious student of political manipulation and mind-control. So turn off the Jewscreen, throw away the National Enquirer and feed your mind with something truly USEFUL!
In the mean time, it's appropriate at this point to mention that there are four absolutely KEY books that everyone must read if they are to have any grasp at all on how we came to be in the state we now find ourselves in. These vitally-important works are 'Brave New World' and 'Brave New World Revisited,' by Huxley and 'Nineteen Eighty-Four' and 'Animal Farm' by George Orwell. If you haven't read these four AT LEAST, you cannot be a serious student of political manipulation and mind-control. So turn off the Jewscreen, throw away the National Enquirer and feed your mind with something truly USEFUL!
Patrick Grimm is Back!
Zionist Watch has been silent for 6 long weeks, but now Patrick is back once again in fine form - and boy does America need him!
Patrick, it's over to you...
"This article was partially written in January and then subsequently edited with more current info and some sarcasm added later. Enjoy."
By Patrick Grimm
Let’s take a gander at two specific cases from just the last few weeks. But first you must understand one thing and not ever forget it. If a person is loyal, subservient and cravenly deferential and obsequiously slavish towards the agenda of Judeo-Marxism, then they shall receive handsome returns from the Jewish overlords, the kingmakers and the muckrakers of the Zionist media. Who knows? The fortunate forked-tongued enablers of the internationalist agenda of Communistic Big Jewry might even get their own damn holidays.
Dr. Mike King, errrr, Martin Luther King, Jr., the supposedly brave civil rights scion was a degenerate, a philanderer, an adulterer who faked the mantle of moral authority even while he battered white hookers, delved into hard-core pornography, used church funds for trysts, plagiarized most of his doctoral thesis with no repercussions, surrounded himself with radical Marxist Jews and attended Communist training camps in his younger years.
But all is forgiven, all is forgotten and ol’ King is canonized, lionized and eulogized eternally because he chose to bend his knee to the Self-Chosen arbiters of anti-white hate and anti-autonomy. He feasted on the returns of the disenfranchisement of Euro-Americans brought to pass by those with an anti-European animus. Yes, Houston, we have a problem, and it’s still the JEWS!
King bought his martyrdom not just from the shot that rang out in Memphis, but because he said the magical “Abracadabra, Open Sesame!” words that gained him the stuff that cellulose dreams are made of. King defended Zionism and Jewish righteousness and the Jewish Communist revolution that was cutting a sweeping swath of white European genocide across sundry lands. King unwaveringly declared himself committed body and soul to the tenets of Zionism in his “Letter to an Anti-Zionist Friend” [1] where he breezily dismisses his friend’s oppositions to the Jewish state with talking points that could have been lifted verbatim from an Anti-Defamation League press release, its caveats against anti-Semitic “carelessness” almost aping Stalin’s sneering dismissal of all who spoke of the “Jewish Revolution” openly.
Now behold the contrast. Take a look at the recently deceased Bobby Fischer, an implacable enemy of international Jewry and one of its loudest and most unhinged (the Jewish lobby would say “mentally ill”) critics. Perhaps Fischer was a Jew and had two Jewish parents, but somewhere along the line he figured out the composition of the Jewish character and was a victim of shrill and hateful Jewish defamation for decades, even finally giving up his US citizenship out of disgust. He loathed Zionism and the greed and thievery at the heart of the Jewish Talmudic longing for world domination, with the United States of America as the “democratic” bouncer sending all other comers smashing to the curb of obscurity at the whim of the Jew bankers and the Jews who run our evil Zionist-infested misnomered “government of, by and for the people.” He knew, like many of us do, that we have a government full of “warm Jews” meaning Jews who are predisposed to supporting Israel and betraying America. Because of Fischer’s verbal trespasses against the Foreskinners [2], any MSM stories related to Fischer’s passing have portrayed the chess master as “crazy”, “anti-Semitic” and “delusional” with no reference or even feinting consideration of the relative truth or untruth of his criticisms of a now untouchable elite devoted disproportionately to treason, usury, counterfeiting and pure unalloyed evil enterprises the world over.
No, Fischer has now become a non-human, a less-than-nobody only for his critiques, which were often crass and obscenity-laden, but mostly apt. He knew as clearly as anyone that to array oneself against Jews is to quicken upon oneself the opprobrium tonnage of Jewish smears and Jewish legal haranguing, if not outright death threats, physical beatings, firebombing or “targeted killing” with a little help from the Jewish Defense League and the fine America-funded boys from the Israeli Mossad.
This is why I will say unashamedly that “My heroes have always been ‘anti-Semites.’” If you want to know where the power lies in our country, then look at the lemmings and the quislings who are showered with gifts and bestowed with king-like status by the Jews. They are the twisted troglodytes traipsing down the primrose path to the one-worlder dream of Zion. They are the McCains, the Clintons and anyone else who has made it into the ranks of the political elite. Behold a chimpish George W. Bush visiting the only country he can now enter without being burned in effigy, where the scourge of his treason is still reckoned unto him as righteousness and virtue as he sheds a tear for the non-existent six million at Yad Vashem and whimpers that the United States should have bombed Auschwitz or done something, anything to stop the deaths of the only human beings whose lives really matter in the first place. No tears fell for the 70+ million non-Self-Choseners who perished fighting the Second World Jew War, nor has a ‘thank you card’ been sent to the families of all those who have died for the most contemporary and recent Big Lie spun by the Jews.
Those who tell the hard truth, who step forward risking reputation, good name, family, livelihood, are not heroes, at least not when their names are mentioned by anyone other than working Caucasoid Americans and those who still cherish old Euro-America before its glow was dulled, its spark starved of oxygen beneath the bushel of Judeo-Marxism. The commercially mongrelized who dance to hip hop on the small screen and beg for more diversity and those of the monolithic minds who work our government and orgasm at the mere thought of the “death of whiteness” will always see an MLK as angel and a Bobby Fischer or a David Duke or a Patrick Buchanan as devil, not because these individuals are factually wrong or can be proven to be factually wrong, but because they do not apologize for being so right about racial realism and Jewish duplicity.
I find it more than coincidental that almost every person I admire and who has contributed most to making a better country and a better world is now considered by “conventional wisdom” to be an “anti-Semite.” Henry Ford, Walt Disney, Charles Lindbergh, Thomas Edison, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Ezra Pound and now even Gandhi’s grandson Arun Gandhi have been added to the list of “anti-Semite” villains that the public must, on orders from above, detest. Sure, Mahatma may have set India back 75 years, but Arun at least was brave enough to speak the truth and warn the planet of the death and bloodshed that Zionism, Israel and an excrement-like Jewish culture brings. Of course he is now being predictably chastised and brow-beaten, but such is life in the Jewdasphere, isn’t it?
What do we need now? What we don’t need are more holidays honoring monsters masquerading as saints, just because they were of a darker hue or supported Jewish supremacism and Zionist-Marxist aims. Toss King and the other sock puppets for the Jew money masters aside and learn the heroism to be had from becoming, at least in the eyes of the Jews and their Jewdas-goats, an “anti-Semite.” Our ranks are growing larger, more prestigious and more relentless all the time. Perhaps one day you will join us and the world will not be as one, but a multiplicity of autonomies with true diversity, a tapestry made up of all the races and nations the Jews want to erase forever, but who remain defiantly existent.
Patrick, it's over to you...
"This article was partially written in January and then subsequently edited with more current info and some sarcasm added later. Enjoy."
By Patrick Grimm
Let’s take a gander at two specific cases from just the last few weeks. But first you must understand one thing and not ever forget it. If a person is loyal, subservient and cravenly deferential and obsequiously slavish towards the agenda of Judeo-Marxism, then they shall receive handsome returns from the Jewish overlords, the kingmakers and the muckrakers of the Zionist media. Who knows? The fortunate forked-tongued enablers of the internationalist agenda of Communistic Big Jewry might even get their own damn holidays.
Dr. Mike King, errrr, Martin Luther King, Jr., the supposedly brave civil rights scion was a degenerate, a philanderer, an adulterer who faked the mantle of moral authority even while he battered white hookers, delved into hard-core pornography, used church funds for trysts, plagiarized most of his doctoral thesis with no repercussions, surrounded himself with radical Marxist Jews and attended Communist training camps in his younger years.
But all is forgiven, all is forgotten and ol’ King is canonized, lionized and eulogized eternally because he chose to bend his knee to the Self-Chosen arbiters of anti-white hate and anti-autonomy. He feasted on the returns of the disenfranchisement of Euro-Americans brought to pass by those with an anti-European animus. Yes, Houston, we have a problem, and it’s still the JEWS!
King bought his martyrdom not just from the shot that rang out in Memphis, but because he said the magical “Abracadabra, Open Sesame!” words that gained him the stuff that cellulose dreams are made of. King defended Zionism and Jewish righteousness and the Jewish Communist revolution that was cutting a sweeping swath of white European genocide across sundry lands. King unwaveringly declared himself committed body and soul to the tenets of Zionism in his “Letter to an Anti-Zionist Friend” [1] where he breezily dismisses his friend’s oppositions to the Jewish state with talking points that could have been lifted verbatim from an Anti-Defamation League press release, its caveats against anti-Semitic “carelessness” almost aping Stalin’s sneering dismissal of all who spoke of the “Jewish Revolution” openly.
Now behold the contrast. Take a look at the recently deceased Bobby Fischer, an implacable enemy of international Jewry and one of its loudest and most unhinged (the Jewish lobby would say “mentally ill”) critics. Perhaps Fischer was a Jew and had two Jewish parents, but somewhere along the line he figured out the composition of the Jewish character and was a victim of shrill and hateful Jewish defamation for decades, even finally giving up his US citizenship out of disgust. He loathed Zionism and the greed and thievery at the heart of the Jewish Talmudic longing for world domination, with the United States of America as the “democratic” bouncer sending all other comers smashing to the curb of obscurity at the whim of the Jew bankers and the Jews who run our evil Zionist-infested misnomered “government of, by and for the people.” He knew, like many of us do, that we have a government full of “warm Jews” meaning Jews who are predisposed to supporting Israel and betraying America. Because of Fischer’s verbal trespasses against the Foreskinners [2], any MSM stories related to Fischer’s passing have portrayed the chess master as “crazy”, “anti-Semitic” and “delusional” with no reference or even feinting consideration of the relative truth or untruth of his criticisms of a now untouchable elite devoted disproportionately to treason, usury, counterfeiting and pure unalloyed evil enterprises the world over.
No, Fischer has now become a non-human, a less-than-nobody only for his critiques, which were often crass and obscenity-laden, but mostly apt. He knew as clearly as anyone that to array oneself against Jews is to quicken upon oneself the opprobrium tonnage of Jewish smears and Jewish legal haranguing, if not outright death threats, physical beatings, firebombing or “targeted killing” with a little help from the Jewish Defense League and the fine America-funded boys from the Israeli Mossad.
This is why I will say unashamedly that “My heroes have always been ‘anti-Semites.’” If you want to know where the power lies in our country, then look at the lemmings and the quislings who are showered with gifts and bestowed with king-like status by the Jews. They are the twisted troglodytes traipsing down the primrose path to the one-worlder dream of Zion. They are the McCains, the Clintons and anyone else who has made it into the ranks of the political elite. Behold a chimpish George W. Bush visiting the only country he can now enter without being burned in effigy, where the scourge of his treason is still reckoned unto him as righteousness and virtue as he sheds a tear for the non-existent six million at Yad Vashem and whimpers that the United States should have bombed Auschwitz or done something, anything to stop the deaths of the only human beings whose lives really matter in the first place. No tears fell for the 70+ million non-Self-Choseners who perished fighting the Second World Jew War, nor has a ‘thank you card’ been sent to the families of all those who have died for the most contemporary and recent Big Lie spun by the Jews.
Those who tell the hard truth, who step forward risking reputation, good name, family, livelihood, are not heroes, at least not when their names are mentioned by anyone other than working Caucasoid Americans and those who still cherish old Euro-America before its glow was dulled, its spark starved of oxygen beneath the bushel of Judeo-Marxism. The commercially mongrelized who dance to hip hop on the small screen and beg for more diversity and those of the monolithic minds who work our government and orgasm at the mere thought of the “death of whiteness” will always see an MLK as angel and a Bobby Fischer or a David Duke or a Patrick Buchanan as devil, not because these individuals are factually wrong or can be proven to be factually wrong, but because they do not apologize for being so right about racial realism and Jewish duplicity.
I find it more than coincidental that almost every person I admire and who has contributed most to making a better country and a better world is now considered by “conventional wisdom” to be an “anti-Semite.” Henry Ford, Walt Disney, Charles Lindbergh, Thomas Edison, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Ezra Pound and now even Gandhi’s grandson Arun Gandhi have been added to the list of “anti-Semite” villains that the public must, on orders from above, detest. Sure, Mahatma may have set India back 75 years, but Arun at least was brave enough to speak the truth and warn the planet of the death and bloodshed that Zionism, Israel and an excrement-like Jewish culture brings. Of course he is now being predictably chastised and brow-beaten, but such is life in the Jewdasphere, isn’t it?
What do we need now? What we don’t need are more holidays honoring monsters masquerading as saints, just because they were of a darker hue or supported Jewish supremacism and Zionist-Marxist aims. Toss King and the other sock puppets for the Jew money masters aside and learn the heroism to be had from becoming, at least in the eyes of the Jews and their Jewdas-goats, an “anti-Semite.” Our ranks are growing larger, more prestigious and more relentless all the time. Perhaps one day you will join us and the world will not be as one, but a multiplicity of autonomies with true diversity, a tapestry made up of all the races and nations the Jews want to erase forever, but who remain defiantly existent.
Don't Leave the Country if Obama Becomes President!
.
There's really no need. If America does elect this Negro to the White House, things will still trundle on exactly as before. Obama will simply be another puppet of Israel, like Bush 2, Clinton, Bush 1 and the rest. So no real change and America will continue to go to the Devil. The guy in the Oval Office is really quite an irrelevance; kind of like the Queen of England - just a figurehead. In fact you could have Kermit the Frog or Miss Piggy as Chief and it wouldn't make a blind bit of difference to the direction this country's heading in. And it never will, until such time as the Jews (who REALLY call the shots) are removed lock, stock and barrel from ALL positions of public influence in this country - for ever.
There's really no need. If America does elect this Negro to the White House, things will still trundle on exactly as before. Obama will simply be another puppet of Israel, like Bush 2, Clinton, Bush 1 and the rest. So no real change and America will continue to go to the Devil. The guy in the Oval Office is really quite an irrelevance; kind of like the Queen of England - just a figurehead. In fact you could have Kermit the Frog or Miss Piggy as Chief and it wouldn't make a blind bit of difference to the direction this country's heading in. And it never will, until such time as the Jews (who REALLY call the shots) are removed lock, stock and barrel from ALL positions of public influence in this country - for ever.
Wednesday, February 6, 2008
What exactly is the "Judeo-Christian Tradition"?
.
It's a phrase that's frequently tossed around nowadays, you may have noticed it cropping up ubiquitously yourself! Certainly our bellicose presidential hopeful, John McCain has been keen to repeat it loudly wherever he goes, presumably to give a clear signal to the all-powerful Israel-First lobby that he's their guy and for him at least - the old war-horse that he claims to be - Zionism isn't a dirty word.
But seriously: is there any commonality to be found in the two faiths? In Phaedrus' considered submission, no, there is NONE. Granted, Christ was a Jew - a good man who unaccountably sprung from Jewish loins - something of a miracle in itself, you may think. He grew up to eschew everything Judaism stood for and provoked the anger of the Pharisees to such a degree that they engineered his long and excruciatingly painful death. And that was the end of this not-so-beautiful relationship.
So much then for common factors. Judaism and Christianity are poles apart; more different in every respect even than chalk and cheese. There is no such thing as the "Judeo-Christian Tradition" and anyone who uses this term ought to be regarded with the utmost suspicion, for they are either a willful ignoramus, someone sucking up to the Jews, or else a cunning Jew attempting to revise theology for Israel's benefit.
It's always been something of a mystery to me how come one almost invariably finds the New Testament 'bundled' with the Old. Printing two entirely different books within a single binder doesn't unify two different religions, I'm afraid, much though the Jews would like it to appear so. Christians should properly refuse to accept such editions, for the bulk of them are filled with Evil and ill-disguised Satanism. Only the stuff from AD.0 counts for anything.
The Gods are different, too. The God of the Old Testament - the Jewish God - is a different entity altogether from the God of the New Testament - the father of Jesus. And if you have two distinctly different deities, then there's no way anyone can successfully pass off the lie that the two faiths are in essence of one and the same root. For example, in one unguarded moment, Harold Rosenthal, aide to a fellow Ashkenazi Jew, Senator Jacob Javits, stated in 1976 that: “Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer.”
Of course it's in the Jews' best interests for them to deny this rather disturbing fact. The pretense of a Christian connection helps to make them feel less marginalized in the world for one thing, and no doubt American tax payers feel less irate at having to throw endless piles of their cash at Israel for another, if they can be convinced they're fulfilling a Bible prophesy. And again, we are constantly told that "Israel is our ally." Boy! Some ally! But the fact remains that Jews and Christians are entirely separate faiths and furthermore share neither bloodline nor racial nor ideological characteristics.
So the next time you hear someone use this term within your hearing, don't just let it pass. Pull them up on it. Demand to know who they are and WHY they are lying.. Which of the above categories do they fall into: fool, sycophant or knave? If you're really lucky and strike gold, it'll be McCain out electioneering with his new best buddy Joe Lieberman and you can grab the SOB by the throat and demand to know what his little game is in spreading such lies to the American people. Do it! Do it for America!
It's a phrase that's frequently tossed around nowadays, you may have noticed it cropping up ubiquitously yourself! Certainly our bellicose presidential hopeful, John McCain has been keen to repeat it loudly wherever he goes, presumably to give a clear signal to the all-powerful Israel-First lobby that he's their guy and for him at least - the old war-horse that he claims to be - Zionism isn't a dirty word.
But seriously: is there any commonality to be found in the two faiths? In Phaedrus' considered submission, no, there is NONE. Granted, Christ was a Jew - a good man who unaccountably sprung from Jewish loins - something of a miracle in itself, you may think. He grew up to eschew everything Judaism stood for and provoked the anger of the Pharisees to such a degree that they engineered his long and excruciatingly painful death. And that was the end of this not-so-beautiful relationship.
So much then for common factors. Judaism and Christianity are poles apart; more different in every respect even than chalk and cheese. There is no such thing as the "Judeo-Christian Tradition" and anyone who uses this term ought to be regarded with the utmost suspicion, for they are either a willful ignoramus, someone sucking up to the Jews, or else a cunning Jew attempting to revise theology for Israel's benefit.
It's always been something of a mystery to me how come one almost invariably finds the New Testament 'bundled' with the Old. Printing two entirely different books within a single binder doesn't unify two different religions, I'm afraid, much though the Jews would like it to appear so. Christians should properly refuse to accept such editions, for the bulk of them are filled with Evil and ill-disguised Satanism. Only the stuff from AD.0 counts for anything.
The Gods are different, too. The God of the Old Testament - the Jewish God - is a different entity altogether from the God of the New Testament - the father of Jesus. And if you have two distinctly different deities, then there's no way anyone can successfully pass off the lie that the two faiths are in essence of one and the same root. For example, in one unguarded moment, Harold Rosenthal, aide to a fellow Ashkenazi Jew, Senator Jacob Javits, stated in 1976 that: “Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer.”
Of course it's in the Jews' best interests for them to deny this rather disturbing fact. The pretense of a Christian connection helps to make them feel less marginalized in the world for one thing, and no doubt American tax payers feel less irate at having to throw endless piles of their cash at Israel for another, if they can be convinced they're fulfilling a Bible prophesy. And again, we are constantly told that "Israel is our ally." Boy! Some ally! But the fact remains that Jews and Christians are entirely separate faiths and furthermore share neither bloodline nor racial nor ideological characteristics.
So the next time you hear someone use this term within your hearing, don't just let it pass. Pull them up on it. Demand to know who they are and WHY they are lying.. Which of the above categories do they fall into: fool, sycophant or knave? If you're really lucky and strike gold, it'll be McCain out electioneering with his new best buddy Joe Lieberman and you can grab the SOB by the throat and demand to know what his little game is in spreading such lies to the American people. Do it! Do it for America!
Who Are the REAL Racists?
It's interesting to note CNN's racial breakdown figures for supporters of Obama and Clinton. Almost exactly 50% of white Democrats support Obama as against Hillary; whereas he enjoys fully two-thirds of the black vote. So no color prejudice on the part of the white constituency, but plenty on the part of the black. I wonder how many white folks out there will spot the irony of this situation? Vanishingly few, I imagine. And fewer still will so much as discuss it for fear of being labeled "racist!"
Is America Ready for a Black President?
Is America Ready for a Negro President?
Is America ready for a female president?
Is America ready for a lesbian president?
Is America ready for a gay president?
Is America ready for a Jewish president?
Is America ready for a disabled president?
Is America ready for a disabled black lesbian president?
Who thinks up these stupid, meaningless questions? This kind of thinking is typical of New World Order proponents who would like to lead us into the belief that we all think alike and share common values. The fact of the matter is it is down to the INDIVIDUAL to decide whether he/she can face having someone 'different' sitting in the Oval Office. We do NOT all think the same, and heaven forfend such a day of enforced conformity should ever arrive.
Is America ready for a female president?
Is America ready for a lesbian president?
Is America ready for a gay president?
Is America ready for a Jewish president?
Is America ready for a disabled president?
Is America ready for a disabled black lesbian president?
Who thinks up these stupid, meaningless questions? This kind of thinking is typical of New World Order proponents who would like to lead us into the belief that we all think alike and share common values. The fact of the matter is it is down to the INDIVIDUAL to decide whether he/she can face having someone 'different' sitting in the Oval Office. We do NOT all think the same, and heaven forfend such a day of enforced conformity should ever arrive.
Why No Blue Eyes?
.
It just strikes me as very odd. Like most people I have been wasting far too much time watching the wall-to-wall coverage of the so-called 'Race for the White House' and I have seen an endless procession of the jewsmedia's talking heads expounding various disingenuous views on who's doing well and who isn't. But you know what? None of these 'observers' and 'commentators' have blue eyes!
It may strike some folks as a petty gripe, but is there something more to it than mere happenstance? Not only the aforementioned self-appointed political pundits, but more generally; news anchors, the weather presenters, the talk show hosts - I can think of NONE of them that have blue eyes. Why are people with blue eyes being under-represented in the mainstream media? They still form a significant proportion of the American people, yet it's like the TV channels don't want to acknowledge they even exist. I wonder why?
It just strikes me as very odd. Like most people I have been wasting far too much time watching the wall-to-wall coverage of the so-called 'Race for the White House' and I have seen an endless procession of the jewsmedia's talking heads expounding various disingenuous views on who's doing well and who isn't. But you know what? None of these 'observers' and 'commentators' have blue eyes!
It may strike some folks as a petty gripe, but is there something more to it than mere happenstance? Not only the aforementioned self-appointed political pundits, but more generally; news anchors, the weather presenters, the talk show hosts - I can think of NONE of them that have blue eyes. Why are people with blue eyes being under-represented in the mainstream media? They still form a significant proportion of the American people, yet it's like the TV channels don't want to acknowledge they even exist. I wonder why?
Monday, February 4, 2008
NEW WORLD ORDER SETS COURSE TO DESTROY FAMILY UNIT
Regular readers will know that Phaedrus never solicits items for publication. However, exceptionally on this one occasion, a guest-writer sets out his views on our government-backed media's assassination plan for our families and I feel powerless in the face of such a direct message to stand in the way of its dissemination. Enjoy....
"It is no secret that today's social problems can be traced to the disintegration of the family unit. Sociologists and politicians from both parties are speaking publicly about this. What is not discussed openly is that this phenomenon is the result of a planned conspiracy to usurp control over the children of the world. It is the determined purpose of the New World Order to dominate and subdue the cultures of the world and shape them into one global culture. To do this it has been necessary to remove children from the environment of the traditional family where they would receive religious instruction and be trained to think independently.
"In 1968, Warren Bennis and Philip Slater wrote in THE TEMPORARY SOCIETY, "One cannot permit submission to parental authority if one wishes to bring about profound social change....In order to effect rapid changes, any such centralized regime must mount a vigorous attack on the family lest the traditions of present generations be preserved. It is necessary, in other words, artificially to create an experiential chasm between parents and children to insulate the latter in order that they can more easily be indoctrinated with new ideas. The desire may be to cause an even more total submission to the state, but if one wishes to mold children in order to achieve some future goal, one must begin to view them as superior, inasmuch as they are closer to this future goal. One must also study their needs with care in order to achieve this difficult preparation for the future. One must teach them not to respect their tradition-bound elders, who are tied to the past and know only what is irrelevant.
"In 1969, the Joint Commission on Mental Health of Children presented a report to Congress, stating, "As the home and church decline in influence...schools must begin to provide adequately for the emotional and moral development of children....The school...must assume a direct responsibility for the attitudes and values of child development. The child advocate, psychologist, social technician, and medical technician should all reach aggressively into the community, send workers out to children's homes, recreational facilities and schools. They should assume full responsibility for all education, including pre-primary education.
"Even though many children live with their parents, they are being effectively raised by their school teachers and the television media. They are taught by both in subtle ways to disrespect parental authority and look upon the traditions of the past as backward.
"Brock Chisholm (1959 Humanist of the Year) was at one time head of the World Health Organization, and in the February 1946 issue of PSYCHIATRY he wrote, "To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family tradition national patriotism, and religious dogmas....We have swallowed all manner of poisonous certainties fed us by our parents, our Sunday and day school teachers, our politicians, our priests....The reinterpretation and eventual eradication of the concept of right and wrong which has been the basis of child training, the substitution of intelligent and rational thinking for faith in the certainties of old people, these are the belated objectives...for charting the changes in human behavior.
"Never in the history of the world has the experience of being a child been so fraught with danger and stress. If a child survives its prenatal stage without being aborted, it could possibly face a fatherless childhood, living on welfare in an urban environment with drugs and violence. If the child is raised by both parents at home, both parents might be required to work out of economic necessity and the child would spend its early, formative years in day care.
"There is no question that child neglect and abuse is epidemic. Stresses placed on society are often taken out on its most weak and vulnerable members. It seems that the only recourse for society to take is to pass laws protecting its children.
"This created crisis has formed a vacuum in which government must naturally fill. Legislation has given broad powers to state social workers. If they so much as receive an anonymous tip about the possibility of child neglect or abuse, they may, accompanied by law enforcement, enter a home without a warrant (warrants are obtained as a result of sworn testimony from a witness). They may separate the children from the parents and ask them embarrassing, personal questions. They may take them into protective custody if they feel they have just cause to do so.
"Public hysteria over children's issues has cleared the way for social workers to obtain police state powers in the name of "protecting children." This ambiguous mission statement must necessarily include, "protecting children from their parents." The state may intervene in a home where it feels the children are being harmed by the manner in which they are being raised, such as home schooling, corporal punishment or hard work.
"All things are as the New World Order planners would have it. They have used the media to flood our culture with promiscuous sexual attitudes. Teaching of "safe sex" has given license to teen indulgence, creating a generation of unwanted children who must be raised by the state and who will grow into violent crime and alcohol and substance abuse. Economic pressures have weakened the family unit, creating rebellion and division in the home. "Women's rights" and "children's rights" have worsened the lot of both. Yet unbelievably, this is how the planners would have it."
- Source: 'the Winds'
Notes by Phaedrus:
1. I try to restrict this blog's contents to my own, original writings so far as possible, but the above essay. penned by an unknown person who clearly has his head well above the sand, was a simply 'must include' one. Increasing numbers of such essays are being penned incognito by social scientists, sociologists, evolutionary biologists and psychologists who have seen at first hand how the Western world is being dragged into the Jews' chaotic sewer of sociopathic malaise and feel compelled to warn others of what's REALLY going on.
2. Naturally, these priceless gems of Truth escape only rarely and sadly not without great risk to their authors' future career path progression; for these conscienceous people are clearly exposing the 'ideal of oneworldism' as an obscene, fatally-flawed and ruinously-dangerous LIE: a concept which has been tried extensively for DECADES now- with CATASTROPHIC consequences for the well-being of Western society.
3. The dogma of the UN and its Jewish puppet-masters is that all men were created equal and that given equal life chances, each could do as well as any other from anywhere else around the globe. We now know this to be utterly groundless and totally discredited idealogical bullshit. Yet there are still those in power who continue to hang on desperately to this unspeakably corrupt and outmoded philosophy.
4. There is but one dogma that advances mankind and never betrays it: the pursuit of Truth. Trying to censor certain uncomfortable realities or decrying those with the audacity to voice them only EVER leads mankind into darkness and retards the development of ALL the peoples of the earth. It begats corruption, famines, wars and plague in places such as Africa and elsewhere. The politically-correct; the lunatic Liberals, the Communists, the black supremacists and the rest of the ideologues have done NOTHING to ameliorate the human condition. Lies are Evil. Their continuous propagation through the Jewish-controlled media cripples the healthy development of individuals and societies.
The great Libertarian Charles Peguy once expounded:
'A person who does not BELLOW the Truth when he KNOWS the Truth is the accomplice of Liars and Forgers!'
Similarly, Sir Winston Churchill:
'Truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it and ignorance may deride it, but, in the end, there it is.'
And finally, Miguel de Cervantes:
'Truth indeed rather alleviates than hurts, and will always bear up against falsehood, as oil does above water.'
So we can see from the foregoing that the Jews above all have very good reason indeed to fear Truth.
"It is no secret that today's social problems can be traced to the disintegration of the family unit. Sociologists and politicians from both parties are speaking publicly about this. What is not discussed openly is that this phenomenon is the result of a planned conspiracy to usurp control over the children of the world. It is the determined purpose of the New World Order to dominate and subdue the cultures of the world and shape them into one global culture. To do this it has been necessary to remove children from the environment of the traditional family where they would receive religious instruction and be trained to think independently.
"In 1968, Warren Bennis and Philip Slater wrote in THE TEMPORARY SOCIETY, "One cannot permit submission to parental authority if one wishes to bring about profound social change....In order to effect rapid changes, any such centralized regime must mount a vigorous attack on the family lest the traditions of present generations be preserved. It is necessary, in other words, artificially to create an experiential chasm between parents and children to insulate the latter in order that they can more easily be indoctrinated with new ideas. The desire may be to cause an even more total submission to the state, but if one wishes to mold children in order to achieve some future goal, one must begin to view them as superior, inasmuch as they are closer to this future goal. One must also study their needs with care in order to achieve this difficult preparation for the future. One must teach them not to respect their tradition-bound elders, who are tied to the past and know only what is irrelevant.
"In 1969, the Joint Commission on Mental Health of Children presented a report to Congress, stating, "As the home and church decline in influence...schools must begin to provide adequately for the emotional and moral development of children....The school...must assume a direct responsibility for the attitudes and values of child development. The child advocate, psychologist, social technician, and medical technician should all reach aggressively into the community, send workers out to children's homes, recreational facilities and schools. They should assume full responsibility for all education, including pre-primary education.
"Even though many children live with their parents, they are being effectively raised by their school teachers and the television media. They are taught by both in subtle ways to disrespect parental authority and look upon the traditions of the past as backward.
"Brock Chisholm (1959 Humanist of the Year) was at one time head of the World Health Organization, and in the February 1946 issue of PSYCHIATRY he wrote, "To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family tradition national patriotism, and religious dogmas....We have swallowed all manner of poisonous certainties fed us by our parents, our Sunday and day school teachers, our politicians, our priests....The reinterpretation and eventual eradication of the concept of right and wrong which has been the basis of child training, the substitution of intelligent and rational thinking for faith in the certainties of old people, these are the belated objectives...for charting the changes in human behavior.
"Never in the history of the world has the experience of being a child been so fraught with danger and stress. If a child survives its prenatal stage without being aborted, it could possibly face a fatherless childhood, living on welfare in an urban environment with drugs and violence. If the child is raised by both parents at home, both parents might be required to work out of economic necessity and the child would spend its early, formative years in day care.
"There is no question that child neglect and abuse is epidemic. Stresses placed on society are often taken out on its most weak and vulnerable members. It seems that the only recourse for society to take is to pass laws protecting its children.
"This created crisis has formed a vacuum in which government must naturally fill. Legislation has given broad powers to state social workers. If they so much as receive an anonymous tip about the possibility of child neglect or abuse, they may, accompanied by law enforcement, enter a home without a warrant (warrants are obtained as a result of sworn testimony from a witness). They may separate the children from the parents and ask them embarrassing, personal questions. They may take them into protective custody if they feel they have just cause to do so.
"Public hysteria over children's issues has cleared the way for social workers to obtain police state powers in the name of "protecting children." This ambiguous mission statement must necessarily include, "protecting children from their parents." The state may intervene in a home where it feels the children are being harmed by the manner in which they are being raised, such as home schooling, corporal punishment or hard work.
"All things are as the New World Order planners would have it. They have used the media to flood our culture with promiscuous sexual attitudes. Teaching of "safe sex" has given license to teen indulgence, creating a generation of unwanted children who must be raised by the state and who will grow into violent crime and alcohol and substance abuse. Economic pressures have weakened the family unit, creating rebellion and division in the home. "Women's rights" and "children's rights" have worsened the lot of both. Yet unbelievably, this is how the planners would have it."
- Source: 'the Winds'
Notes by Phaedrus:
1. I try to restrict this blog's contents to my own, original writings so far as possible, but the above essay. penned by an unknown person who clearly has his head well above the sand, was a simply 'must include' one. Increasing numbers of such essays are being penned incognito by social scientists, sociologists, evolutionary biologists and psychologists who have seen at first hand how the Western world is being dragged into the Jews' chaotic sewer of sociopathic malaise and feel compelled to warn others of what's REALLY going on.
2. Naturally, these priceless gems of Truth escape only rarely and sadly not without great risk to their authors' future career path progression; for these conscienceous people are clearly exposing the 'ideal of oneworldism' as an obscene, fatally-flawed and ruinously-dangerous LIE: a concept which has been tried extensively for DECADES now- with CATASTROPHIC consequences for the well-being of Western society.
3. The dogma of the UN and its Jewish puppet-masters is that all men were created equal and that given equal life chances, each could do as well as any other from anywhere else around the globe. We now know this to be utterly groundless and totally discredited idealogical bullshit. Yet there are still those in power who continue to hang on desperately to this unspeakably corrupt and outmoded philosophy.
4. There is but one dogma that advances mankind and never betrays it: the pursuit of Truth. Trying to censor certain uncomfortable realities or decrying those with the audacity to voice them only EVER leads mankind into darkness and retards the development of ALL the peoples of the earth. It begats corruption, famines, wars and plague in places such as Africa and elsewhere. The politically-correct; the lunatic Liberals, the Communists, the black supremacists and the rest of the ideologues have done NOTHING to ameliorate the human condition. Lies are Evil. Their continuous propagation through the Jewish-controlled media cripples the healthy development of individuals and societies.
The great Libertarian Charles Peguy once expounded:
'A person who does not BELLOW the Truth when he KNOWS the Truth is the accomplice of Liars and Forgers!'
Similarly, Sir Winston Churchill:
'Truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it and ignorance may deride it, but, in the end, there it is.'
And finally, Miguel de Cervantes:
'Truth indeed rather alleviates than hurts, and will always bear up against falsehood, as oil does above water.'
So we can see from the foregoing that the Jews above all have very good reason indeed to fear Truth.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
