In Part 7, we were able to see how blanket control over the media had enabled the Jews to become the only game in town when it came to dissemination of information and that the alphabet soup of TV channels on offer that suggest the availability of free choice is simply an illusion. Virtually ALL the networks are pushing forward the NWO agenda by promoting the idea that free-trade, globalization and mass movements of peoples between countries is a Good Thing which brings jobs and prosperity. And whilst we dive headlong into embracing this cultural suicide, the really big gainers, as always, are the Jews. By acting as intermediaries, agents and obstacles between parties in international trade (a core business of this parasite going back Millenia) they can ALWAYS make a good living, regardless of how impoverished those poor fools competing for ever worsening living standards consequently become.
Huxley, 1958:
"In the West, democratic principles are proclaimed and many able and conscientious publicists do their best to supply electors with adequate information and to persuade them, by rational argument, to make realistic choices in the light of that information. All this is greatly to the good. But unfortunately propaganda in the Western democracies above all in America, has two faces and a divided personality. In charge of the editorial department there is often a democratic Dr Jekyll - a propagandist who would be very happy to prove that John Dewey had been right about the ability of human nature to respond to truth and reason. But this worthy man controls only a part of the machinery of mass communication.
"In charge of advertising we find an anti-democrat because anti-rational, Mr Hyde - or rather a Doctor Hyde, for Hyde is now a Ph.D. in psychology and has a master's degree as well in the Social Sciences. This Dr Hyde would be very unhappy indeed if everybody always lived up to John Dewey's faith in human nature. Truth and reason are Jekyll's affairs, not his . Hyde is a Motivation Analyst, and his business is to study human weaknesses and failings, to investigate those unconscious desires and fears by which so much of men's conscious thinking and overt doing is determined. And he does this, not in the spirit of the moralist who would like to make people better, or of the physician who would like to improve health, but simply in order to find out the best way to take advantage of their ignorance and to exploit their irrationality for the pecuniary benefit of his employers."
Here again, Huxley re-affirms his conviction that the mass media is working AGAINST the best interests of the people. His 'Dr. Hyde' character is alive and with us in the West today, too. Yet since we are now 50 years down the road from when Huxley penned his observations, the new Dr. Hyde of today has infinitely more techniques for deception in his armory. Fifty years of endless studies into what makes people tick in the most microscopic areas of their lives has yielded hundreds of thousands of documents and reports detailing every gleanable fact from the human psyche and how it may be ruthlessly and cynically manipulated to ensure that the naked greed of the Jew is to some extent at least satiated. And all this goes on with the full backing of Western governments, the leaders of which have become phenomenally wealthy for their tacit assistance in selling out the true interests of the people. So much for 'democracy.' So much for 'public service.'
Showing posts with label jew-controlled media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label jew-controlled media. Show all posts
Friday, February 29, 2008
Monday, February 18, 2008
Television Kills
HOW TV IS (quite literally) KILLING US
(First published in the London Daily Mail, October 2005)
by Dr Aric Sigman
The studio audience is chanting as the two women - a wife and a
mistress - square up to each other over an errant husband. 'Bitch or
whore? Bitch or whore? Bitch or whore?' the crowd shouts. Then, in a
new expression of on-air hostility, the two rivals strip naked and
scream obscenities before lunging at each other like two 16-stone
animals, trading punches. The rhapsodic chanting reaches a crescendo.
It has been another good day for the Jerry Springer television show.
Thousands of miles away from that Chicago TV studio, in the seaside
town of Hastings in England, I remembered that episode as I stood in
Queen's Arcade at the entrance to the attic where John Logie Baird, the
inventor of the world's first 'seeing by wireless machine,' conducted
his early experiments.
Struggling for years to convince a sceptical world that his creation
was significant, it was here Baird wrote in his draft autobiography
that what drove him on was the sense that 'he was doing something
worthwhile'.
He never finished the book nor lived to see what his invention of
television would become.
What, I wondered, would Baird make of TV now? What would he think of
Jerry Springer's jeering mob? What would he make of television becoming
more popular than shopping or going to the pub, church or library
combined?
Or that more people would vote in a TV contest (Pop Idol) than for the
Prime Minister and his entire party at the last election?
More pertinently, would he ever believe that his remarkable invention
would come to represent one of the greatest dangers to the health of
Britain and its social wellbeing at the dawn of the 21st century?
I've recently compiled a report on the serious risks associated with
watching the amount of television we do. I've analysed a wide range of
scientific studies from government agencies across the world, from the
Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, to The Royal College
of Psychiatrists, The American Medical Association, National Academy
of Sciences, and Harvard and Stanford medical schools.
I've spent months poring over articles in journals ranging from The
Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine to Nature and Journal of
Neuroscience.
The picture I formed was profoundly disturbing and amounts to what I
believe to be the greatest health scandal of our time. I learned that
viewing even moderate amounts of television:
May damage brain cell development and function.
Is the only adult pastime from the ages of 20 to 60
positively linked to developing Alzheimer's disease.
Is a direct cause of obesity - a bigger factor even than
eating junk food or taking too little exercise.
Significantly increases the risk of Type 2 diabetes.
May biologically trigger premature puberty.
Leads to a significantly elevated risk of sleep problems in
adulthood, causing hormone changes which in turn increase body fat
production and appetite, damages the immune system and may lead to a
greater vulnerability to cancer.
Is a major independent cause of clinical depression (of which
Britain has the highest rate in Europe).
These are not wild suppositions: they are based on hard, clinical
evidence that has lain buried in academic journals. For example, scientists at the University of Washington studied 2,500
children and found a strong link between early television exposure and
attention problems by age seven which was 'consistent with a diagnosis
of ADHD'.
For every hour of television a child watches a day, they noted a nine
per cent increase in attentional damage.
Equally shocking was the report in the medical journal Pediatrics which
studied the metabolic rates of 31 children while undertaking a variety
of activities and found that when they watched TV, the children burned
the equivalent of 211 calories fewer per day than if they did
absolutely nothing.
The authors concluded that 'television viewing has a fairly profound
lowering effect of metabolic rate', with all of the health risks that
entails.
More subtle, but no less pernicious, were the results I found when I
traveled the world to research how remote cultures have been affected
by the recent arrival of television. By studying these societies, I
was, in effect, going back in time to see how our own society might
have been shaped by television.
In Bhutan - the last country on earth to introduce TV - I was
appalled to discover that since the arrival of 46 cable channels, the
country was experiencing its first serious crime wave. Greed, avarice
and selfishness had replaced traditional values of peace and respect.
Bhutanese academics had con-ducted a study which showed how television
was to blame for increasing crime, corruption and dramatically changing
attitudes to relationships.
They were particularly appalled to discover that more than a third of
parents now preferred to watch television than talk to their own
children.
I found similar problems when I traveled to Vava'u in Tonga, where I
interviewed Police Chief Inspector Ashley Fua. He told me that since
the arrival of American TV shows and DVDs on his island, crime among
young men had soared.
The problem, he told me, was that until now, there had been no need for
juvenile courts, jails or a criminal justice system. The police were
suddenly having to cope with a crime wave for which they were not
prepared.
Of course, no one is suggesting that all of Britain's social problems
are ascribed to our love of television. But at the very least, these
findings should give us pause to question whether the sheer amount of
television we consume is a force for ill.
Consider the facts. By the age of 75, most of us will have spent more
than twelve-and-a-half years of 24-hour days watching television. It
has become the industrialised world's main activity, taking up more of
our time than any other single activity except work and sleep.
Children now spend more time watching a television screen than they
spend in school. At this very moment, the average six-year-old will
have already watched television for nearly one full year of their
lives.
When other screen-based viewing, such as computer games, is included,
the figure is far higher. Children aged 11 to 15 now spend 53 hours a
week watching TV and computers - an increase of 40 per cent in a
decade.
The health implications for our children are particularly worrying with
the finding that television viewing among children under three seems to
damage their future learning abilities - permanently.
Scientists report 'deleterious effects' on mathematical ability,
reading recognition and comprehension in later childhood.
It's not simply that watching so much television means that children
are not undertaking more stimulating play activities, it is suspected
that the audiovisual output from TV is actually damaging the child's
rapidly developing brain.
The statistics bear this out. Children who have televisions in their
bedrooms at ages eight and nine score worst in school achievement
tests. And a 26-year study, tracking children from birth, has just
concluded 'television viewing in childhood and adolescence is
associated with poor educational achievement by 26 years of age.
[And] may have long-lasting, adverse consequences for educational
achievement and subsequent socio-economic status and wellbeing'.
The doctors found a direct correlation between the amount of television
children watch and the degree of educational damage they suffer.
Significant long-term damage occurs even at so-called 'modest levels'
of viewing - between one and two hours a day.
Confronted with such evidence, I would argue that reducing our screen
time must now be a health priority.
However, because television isn't an intoxicant or a visibly dangerous
activity, it has eluded the warnings that have befallen other health
issues.
Of course, life isn't always about following the safest course of
action. Whether it's sunbathing, drinking alcohol, smoking or eating
junk food, we enjoy lots of things that are, after a certain point, bad
for us or for the rest of society.
That's precisely why governments have recognised the need for concepts
such as recommended units of alcohol, sun-cream SPP factors, safe
cholesterol levels and stark health warnings on cigarette packets.
And yet when it comes to the dramatic and dangerous effects that
watching too much television can have on our health and social
wellbeing, the Government has turned a blind eye.
This issue has gone unheard during the political party conference
season. In its latest White Paper, proposing radical measures to
improve the health of the nation, the Government whitewashes the role
of television into oblivion.
In fact, far from addressing this issue, ministers support building
more giant outdoor television screens as permanent forms of
architecture in city centres.
Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott recently stated these 'Big
screens... could become social hubs for city centres just like village
greens of the past'.
And Culture Secretary Tessa Jowell believes the public must 'learn to
watch TV in order to increase 'media literacy', which she believes
'will become as important a skill as maths or science ... a nation of
active and informed consumers'.
Paced with such blinkered optimism, it is unlikely that the Government
has the political will to issue warnings about TV overload.
Ultimately, people will have to decide for themselves how much and what
type of television they and their children watch - but they must now
be made aware that there is a dark side to John Logic Baird's 'seeing
by wireless' machine.
At present, that awareness is being hindered by nothing short of a
motivated negligence on the part of academics, politicians and media
with financial links to television - all reminiscent of how the
tobacco industry managed for years to claim that smoking was an
enjoy-able activity that had no proven ill effect on the nation's
health.
Even those who advise a 'better-safe-than-sorry' approach are
predictably referred to as alarmist or over-reacting, while official
health watchdogs dispense platitudes such as 'moderation is the key' or
'parents need to strike a balance'.
We need to start asking what 'moderation' and 'balance' actually mean
when they apply to our children's health.
The next time you are told the harmful effects of watching television
apply only to those who spend 'excessive' amounts of time in front of
the box, remember that 'excessive' often means only two hours a day -
far below the national average.
But perhaps the biggest obstacle in the way of facing up to the
dangerous long-term effects of television is the simple fact that we
enjoy watching it.
We are deaf to the warnings because we do not want to hear them. We are too busy watching EastEnders, Midsomer Murders, Countdown or even - heaven help us - Jerry Springer to care.
It was Aldous Huxley who warned us of a world where man's almost
infinite appetite for distractions is used to control him by, in
effect, inflicting pleasure. Huxley feared that what we love will ruin
us. Today, our growing dependency on television means that at the dawn of the 21st century, Huxley's nightmare is becoming a reality.
(First published in the London Daily Mail, October 2005)
by Dr Aric Sigman
The studio audience is chanting as the two women - a wife and a
mistress - square up to each other over an errant husband. 'Bitch or
whore? Bitch or whore? Bitch or whore?' the crowd shouts. Then, in a
new expression of on-air hostility, the two rivals strip naked and
scream obscenities before lunging at each other like two 16-stone
animals, trading punches. The rhapsodic chanting reaches a crescendo.
It has been another good day for the Jerry Springer television show.
Thousands of miles away from that Chicago TV studio, in the seaside
town of Hastings in England, I remembered that episode as I stood in
Queen's Arcade at the entrance to the attic where John Logie Baird, the
inventor of the world's first 'seeing by wireless machine,' conducted
his early experiments.
Struggling for years to convince a sceptical world that his creation
was significant, it was here Baird wrote in his draft autobiography
that what drove him on was the sense that 'he was doing something
worthwhile'.
He never finished the book nor lived to see what his invention of
television would become.
What, I wondered, would Baird make of TV now? What would he think of
Jerry Springer's jeering mob? What would he make of television becoming
more popular than shopping or going to the pub, church or library
combined?
Or that more people would vote in a TV contest (Pop Idol) than for the
Prime Minister and his entire party at the last election?
More pertinently, would he ever believe that his remarkable invention
would come to represent one of the greatest dangers to the health of
Britain and its social wellbeing at the dawn of the 21st century?
I've recently compiled a report on the serious risks associated with
watching the amount of television we do. I've analysed a wide range of
scientific studies from government agencies across the world, from the
Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, to The Royal College
of Psychiatrists, The American Medical Association, National Academy
of Sciences, and Harvard and Stanford medical schools.
I've spent months poring over articles in journals ranging from The
Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine to Nature and Journal of
Neuroscience.
The picture I formed was profoundly disturbing and amounts to what I
believe to be the greatest health scandal of our time. I learned that
viewing even moderate amounts of television:
May damage brain cell development and function.
Is the only adult pastime from the ages of 20 to 60
positively linked to developing Alzheimer's disease.
Is a direct cause of obesity - a bigger factor even than
eating junk food or taking too little exercise.
Significantly increases the risk of Type 2 diabetes.
May biologically trigger premature puberty.
Leads to a significantly elevated risk of sleep problems in
adulthood, causing hormone changes which in turn increase body fat
production and appetite, damages the immune system and may lead to a
greater vulnerability to cancer.
Is a major independent cause of clinical depression (of which
Britain has the highest rate in Europe).
These are not wild suppositions: they are based on hard, clinical
evidence that has lain buried in academic journals. For example, scientists at the University of Washington studied 2,500
children and found a strong link between early television exposure and
attention problems by age seven which was 'consistent with a diagnosis
of ADHD'.
For every hour of television a child watches a day, they noted a nine
per cent increase in attentional damage.
Equally shocking was the report in the medical journal Pediatrics which
studied the metabolic rates of 31 children while undertaking a variety
of activities and found that when they watched TV, the children burned
the equivalent of 211 calories fewer per day than if they did
absolutely nothing.
The authors concluded that 'television viewing has a fairly profound
lowering effect of metabolic rate', with all of the health risks that
entails.
More subtle, but no less pernicious, were the results I found when I
traveled the world to research how remote cultures have been affected
by the recent arrival of television. By studying these societies, I
was, in effect, going back in time to see how our own society might
have been shaped by television.
In Bhutan - the last country on earth to introduce TV - I was
appalled to discover that since the arrival of 46 cable channels, the
country was experiencing its first serious crime wave. Greed, avarice
and selfishness had replaced traditional values of peace and respect.
Bhutanese academics had con-ducted a study which showed how television
was to blame for increasing crime, corruption and dramatically changing
attitudes to relationships.
They were particularly appalled to discover that more than a third of
parents now preferred to watch television than talk to their own
children.
I found similar problems when I traveled to Vava'u in Tonga, where I
interviewed Police Chief Inspector Ashley Fua. He told me that since
the arrival of American TV shows and DVDs on his island, crime among
young men had soared.
The problem, he told me, was that until now, there had been no need for
juvenile courts, jails or a criminal justice system. The police were
suddenly having to cope with a crime wave for which they were not
prepared.
Of course, no one is suggesting that all of Britain's social problems
are ascribed to our love of television. But at the very least, these
findings should give us pause to question whether the sheer amount of
television we consume is a force for ill.
Consider the facts. By the age of 75, most of us will have spent more
than twelve-and-a-half years of 24-hour days watching television. It
has become the industrialised world's main activity, taking up more of
our time than any other single activity except work and sleep.
Children now spend more time watching a television screen than they
spend in school. At this very moment, the average six-year-old will
have already watched television for nearly one full year of their
lives.
When other screen-based viewing, such as computer games, is included,
the figure is far higher. Children aged 11 to 15 now spend 53 hours a
week watching TV and computers - an increase of 40 per cent in a
decade.
The health implications for our children are particularly worrying with
the finding that television viewing among children under three seems to
damage their future learning abilities - permanently.
Scientists report 'deleterious effects' on mathematical ability,
reading recognition and comprehension in later childhood.
It's not simply that watching so much television means that children
are not undertaking more stimulating play activities, it is suspected
that the audiovisual output from TV is actually damaging the child's
rapidly developing brain.
The statistics bear this out. Children who have televisions in their
bedrooms at ages eight and nine score worst in school achievement
tests. And a 26-year study, tracking children from birth, has just
concluded 'television viewing in childhood and adolescence is
associated with poor educational achievement by 26 years of age.
[And] may have long-lasting, adverse consequences for educational
achievement and subsequent socio-economic status and wellbeing'.
The doctors found a direct correlation between the amount of television
children watch and the degree of educational damage they suffer.
Significant long-term damage occurs even at so-called 'modest levels'
of viewing - between one and two hours a day.
Confronted with such evidence, I would argue that reducing our screen
time must now be a health priority.
However, because television isn't an intoxicant or a visibly dangerous
activity, it has eluded the warnings that have befallen other health
issues.
Of course, life isn't always about following the safest course of
action. Whether it's sunbathing, drinking alcohol, smoking or eating
junk food, we enjoy lots of things that are, after a certain point, bad
for us or for the rest of society.
That's precisely why governments have recognised the need for concepts
such as recommended units of alcohol, sun-cream SPP factors, safe
cholesterol levels and stark health warnings on cigarette packets.
And yet when it comes to the dramatic and dangerous effects that
watching too much television can have on our health and social
wellbeing, the Government has turned a blind eye.
This issue has gone unheard during the political party conference
season. In its latest White Paper, proposing radical measures to
improve the health of the nation, the Government whitewashes the role
of television into oblivion.
In fact, far from addressing this issue, ministers support building
more giant outdoor television screens as permanent forms of
architecture in city centres.
Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott recently stated these 'Big
screens... could become social hubs for city centres just like village
greens of the past'.
And Culture Secretary Tessa Jowell believes the public must 'learn to
watch TV in order to increase 'media literacy', which she believes
'will become as important a skill as maths or science ... a nation of
active and informed consumers'.
Paced with such blinkered optimism, it is unlikely that the Government
has the political will to issue warnings about TV overload.
Ultimately, people will have to decide for themselves how much and what
type of television they and their children watch - but they must now
be made aware that there is a dark side to John Logic Baird's 'seeing
by wireless' machine.
At present, that awareness is being hindered by nothing short of a
motivated negligence on the part of academics, politicians and media
with financial links to television - all reminiscent of how the
tobacco industry managed for years to claim that smoking was an
enjoy-able activity that had no proven ill effect on the nation's
health.
Even those who advise a 'better-safe-than-sorry' approach are
predictably referred to as alarmist or over-reacting, while official
health watchdogs dispense platitudes such as 'moderation is the key' or
'parents need to strike a balance'.
We need to start asking what 'moderation' and 'balance' actually mean
when they apply to our children's health.
The next time you are told the harmful effects of watching television
apply only to those who spend 'excessive' amounts of time in front of
the box, remember that 'excessive' often means only two hours a day -
far below the national average.
But perhaps the biggest obstacle in the way of facing up to the
dangerous long-term effects of television is the simple fact that we
enjoy watching it.
We are deaf to the warnings because we do not want to hear them. We are too busy watching EastEnders, Midsomer Murders, Countdown or even - heaven help us - Jerry Springer to care.
It was Aldous Huxley who warned us of a world where man's almost
infinite appetite for distractions is used to control him by, in
effect, inflicting pleasure. Huxley feared that what we love will ruin
us. Today, our growing dependency on television means that at the dawn of the 21st century, Huxley's nightmare is becoming a reality.
Monday, November 5, 2007
Jews - are they Fundamentally Evil?
It probably comes down to how one defines "evil" in the final analysis. But consider the matter carefully. Think long and hard about it because it's a seriously important question which ultimately should inform our decision as to what to do about the jewish Problem.
Most folks just want to get on peacefully with their neighbors, but the more one reads about the long and troubling history of the Jews, the more one has to doubt this benign ideology is applicable in their case.
This is the chief underlying reason that Phaedrus put forward the solution of the compulsory sterilization of all Jews in an earlier essay. There is no other solution that is 100% peaceful, yet 100% effective. Phaedrus is, if nothing else, a peace-seeking person, as are most Gentiles. This solution may strike some as excessively heavy-handed, but consider where we're at today thanks to the Tribe of Israel:-
*9/11: nearly three thousand Americans deliberately sacrificed in one day simply to justify the illegal invasion of an Innocent country and the deaths of hundreds of thousands of more innocent men, women and children.
*A Fucked up society where marriage breakdown, teenage delinquency, abortion and homosexuality are now considered 'normal.'
*New World Order: the systematic demolition of all national boundaries and the promotion of massive uncontrolled immigration in pursuit of the Jews' dream of a unitary world government run by them and a planet without frontiers.
*Racial equality: the promotion of the erroneous belief that there's no fundamental difference between blacks and whites and that interracial relationships are the 'modern way' to go.
*Dollar value: heading south for the foreseeable future largely due to the hemorrhaging of cash to fund foreign wars and to prop up 'Israel.'
*Globalization and its destruction of the world's environment and the ruination of the quality of life for Americans at home who have to compete with Chinese peasants earning a dollar a day.
*Terrorism/war for terror: the active ENCOURAGEMENT and facilitation of terrorism against Americans at home so we'll sign ever more of our rights away and willingly accept, ultimately, rule by presidential decree and the imposition of martial law.
*A 24/7 diet of Trash TV from the jewsmedia, constantly reinforcing the NWO agenda to the detriment of decent, moral values and wholesome, educative entertainment. Former positive, white role models replaced by 'totally blinged-out gangstas' with filthy mouths and mannerisms to lead our youth astray.
*Destruction of Christianity: The effacement of our faith and the ridicule heaped upon its devotees and adherents and the flagrant subversion of the religious festival of Christmas into the year's biggest consumer binge and orgy of gluttony and overindulgence.
*Theft of democracy. Those that control the media (the Jews) also control the Government. No one gets the exposure they need in the national media to succeed in politics unless they prostitute themselves and their beliefs for the interests of the Jews.
My friends, there is a very real risk that if this breed is not 'taken out' of our lives altogether, that it really WILL someday enslave each and every one of us, for the Jews believe that it is their destiny to do so. It is, in fact, written in their so-called Holy book, the Talmud that the rest of us "have been created to serve [them] as slaves."
We find ourselves in the same position that others around the world have found themselves in throughout history - wondering how this small tribe of seemingly benign wandering nomads whom we admitted in good faith, have stolen everything from under our noses and turned our world completely upside down. We need a bold initiative that will prevent this situation from EVER arising again - anywhere on earth.
Most folks just want to get on peacefully with their neighbors, but the more one reads about the long and troubling history of the Jews, the more one has to doubt this benign ideology is applicable in their case.
This is the chief underlying reason that Phaedrus put forward the solution of the compulsory sterilization of all Jews in an earlier essay. There is no other solution that is 100% peaceful, yet 100% effective. Phaedrus is, if nothing else, a peace-seeking person, as are most Gentiles. This solution may strike some as excessively heavy-handed, but consider where we're at today thanks to the Tribe of Israel:-
*9/11: nearly three thousand Americans deliberately sacrificed in one day simply to justify the illegal invasion of an Innocent country and the deaths of hundreds of thousands of more innocent men, women and children.
*A Fucked up society where marriage breakdown, teenage delinquency, abortion and homosexuality are now considered 'normal.'
*New World Order: the systematic demolition of all national boundaries and the promotion of massive uncontrolled immigration in pursuit of the Jews' dream of a unitary world government run by them and a planet without frontiers.
*Racial equality: the promotion of the erroneous belief that there's no fundamental difference between blacks and whites and that interracial relationships are the 'modern way' to go.
*Dollar value: heading south for the foreseeable future largely due to the hemorrhaging of cash to fund foreign wars and to prop up 'Israel.'
*Globalization and its destruction of the world's environment and the ruination of the quality of life for Americans at home who have to compete with Chinese peasants earning a dollar a day.
*Terrorism/war for terror: the active ENCOURAGEMENT and facilitation of terrorism against Americans at home so we'll sign ever more of our rights away and willingly accept, ultimately, rule by presidential decree and the imposition of martial law.
*A 24/7 diet of Trash TV from the jewsmedia, constantly reinforcing the NWO agenda to the detriment of decent, moral values and wholesome, educative entertainment. Former positive, white role models replaced by 'totally blinged-out gangstas' with filthy mouths and mannerisms to lead our youth astray.
*Destruction of Christianity: The effacement of our faith and the ridicule heaped upon its devotees and adherents and the flagrant subversion of the religious festival of Christmas into the year's biggest consumer binge and orgy of gluttony and overindulgence.
*Theft of democracy. Those that control the media (the Jews) also control the Government. No one gets the exposure they need in the national media to succeed in politics unless they prostitute themselves and their beliefs for the interests of the Jews.
My friends, there is a very real risk that if this breed is not 'taken out' of our lives altogether, that it really WILL someday enslave each and every one of us, for the Jews believe that it is their destiny to do so. It is, in fact, written in their so-called Holy book, the Talmud that the rest of us "have been created to serve [them] as slaves."
We find ourselves in the same position that others around the world have found themselves in throughout history - wondering how this small tribe of seemingly benign wandering nomads whom we admitted in good faith, have stolen everything from under our noses and turned our world completely upside down. We need a bold initiative that will prevent this situation from EVER arising again - anywhere on earth.
Wednesday, October 10, 2007
Junk Food for the Soul: the Jewish Media's Mind Poison
One cannot help but notice that we have over the course of recent years been lambasted by dire health warnings concerning our dangerously high levels of consumption of junk foods which, we are told, contain too many fats, sugars, preservatives, colorants, flavorings and salt.
The same applies with tobacco. Time was when the Jew-controlled tobacco industry - as it once was - set up its own 'Panel of Doctors' to investigate whether there really was a link between smoking and lung cancer! And guess what - the panel the Jews hired couldn't find any! It kept these 'doctors' fully salaried for over 30 years, though, which probably accounts for their (lack of) reported findings. Nice work if you can get it, but a terrible shame for the millions who died as a result of the Jews stifling the truth.
Drink? Oh, don't mention it! One of the great evils, we're told. And for some people it undeniably is. If you can't handle your drink and you come home loaded having blown your week's pay in one or two nights and beat up on your wife and/or kids, then Phaedrus doesn't give a sh!t what color your hide is, BOY. You're a deadbeat father and you better straighten yourself up. Nobody's gonna defend your lame ass if you can't fulfill your DUTY to your OWN family.
Drugs: same applies. Some folks can handle them; some can't and psycho-active substances are best just left alone for safety's sake as you never know whether you'll wind up with a problem or not and the cost of finding out which category you fall into can be ruinous for the unlucky ones.
So what have the above examples in common? Have y'all guessed yet? It's HEALTH WARNINGS! Yes, that's right. Governments around the world are very concerned with our health. Not just here and in Europe, but further afield too. They want the rabble to be healthy (It'll reduce medical costs and improve productivity) so they warn us against Bad Stuff. And that's fine! No one could object to that since it's one of the few worthwhile reasons for having a government at all!
Regular readers of this blog will by this time have worked out what Phaedrus' angle is here. For the newcomers (welcome aboard) let me spell it out: THE GREATEST DANGER TO PUBLIC HEALTH CARRIES NO HEALTH WARNING AT ALL: IT'S THE POPULAR MEDIA! TERRIBLE HEALTH RISKS are involved in the following simple pastimes:-
1) Reading newspapers
2) Going to the movies
3) Watching TV
4) Letting your kids read teen magazines
5) Listening to mainstream radio stations
In short: all the most popular and time-consuming leisure activities! And increasingly, these activities are becoming ever more removed from the real-world. We rely on our media sources to bring us snapshots of the entire range of news stories that are taking place 'out there' in the big, wide world. We place our total trust in them to do so. But you know what? That trust has been betrayed - and it HAS been for several DECADES.
Forget about global warming. Forget about Al Quaida. Forget about the Taliban. Forget about Iran's nuclear program. Forget about the skinheads in Russia. Forget about genetically-modified foods. Forget about the value of the dollar. Forget about the home-loan crisis. Forget about cancer, forget about strokes, heart attacks, diabetes, emphasema, deep-vein thrombosis, baldness, pesticides, bird flu, virus-carrying mosquitoes and EVERY OTHER GODDAMN THING THE JEWISH MEDIA DREAMS UP LIKE RODEO CLOWNS to divert our attention from what's really going on!
Gentle reader, by FAR the biggest and most serious threat you and your family will ever have to face are the machinations of the Jews in the Western media and in our so-called Western governments - which, incredible as it seems, ultimately take their orders not from you or me, but from Israel. This threat is HUGE and it is total POISON to society and far, far worse for you and yours than any tangible threat that might arise from some new breed of insect being able to spread AIDS, or Cuba developing nuclear missiles, or whatever else you got.
If we can't BAN television or cinema outright in America (YET!) then we need to enforce the following warning before every TV show or movie screening: "The following feature is highly likely to DAMAGE YOUR BRAIN and POISON YOUR CHILDREN'S MINDS." which is, after all, a hell of a lot more truthful than the current version: "the following feature has been declared suitable for ALL AUDIENCES by the Motion Picture Association of America."
One final point: though the Jew regards his TV media poison as entirely suitable for consumption by OUR kids, his OWN are not permitted to view it, for the Jew knows its dangers. The Jews - an extremely family-orientated people - are very circumspect about allowing potentially deadly cultural influences into the home, so TV is a very rare sight indeed in any Hisadic Jewish home. If it's present at all, it's invariably switched off!
In this way, the Jew is analogous to the drug dealer in the school yard who would never dream of selling drugs to his own children; or the burger-vendor who minces up any old fatty gristle for his customers, but only feeds his own kids on the very finest prime cuts.
It's the world's worst-kept secret. The Jews are total poison to decent society. And this is a fact that (thanks to the Internet) is now becoming ever more widely recognized. Jews are poison. Their Agenda is poison. Tell everyone you know: your kids, their friends, your workmates, your workmates' kids, cops in the street. Tell EVERYONE. Tell them all NOW and for as long as you have breath in your body, KEEP TELLING THEM.
The same applies with tobacco. Time was when the Jew-controlled tobacco industry - as it once was - set up its own 'Panel of Doctors' to investigate whether there really was a link between smoking and lung cancer! And guess what - the panel the Jews hired couldn't find any! It kept these 'doctors' fully salaried for over 30 years, though, which probably accounts for their (lack of) reported findings. Nice work if you can get it, but a terrible shame for the millions who died as a result of the Jews stifling the truth.
Drink? Oh, don't mention it! One of the great evils, we're told. And for some people it undeniably is. If you can't handle your drink and you come home loaded having blown your week's pay in one or two nights and beat up on your wife and/or kids, then Phaedrus doesn't give a sh!t what color your hide is, BOY. You're a deadbeat father and you better straighten yourself up. Nobody's gonna defend your lame ass if you can't fulfill your DUTY to your OWN family.
Drugs: same applies. Some folks can handle them; some can't and psycho-active substances are best just left alone for safety's sake as you never know whether you'll wind up with a problem or not and the cost of finding out which category you fall into can be ruinous for the unlucky ones.
So what have the above examples in common? Have y'all guessed yet? It's HEALTH WARNINGS! Yes, that's right. Governments around the world are very concerned with our health. Not just here and in Europe, but further afield too. They want the rabble to be healthy (It'll reduce medical costs and improve productivity) so they warn us against Bad Stuff. And that's fine! No one could object to that since it's one of the few worthwhile reasons for having a government at all!
Regular readers of this blog will by this time have worked out what Phaedrus' angle is here. For the newcomers (welcome aboard) let me spell it out: THE GREATEST DANGER TO PUBLIC HEALTH CARRIES NO HEALTH WARNING AT ALL: IT'S THE POPULAR MEDIA! TERRIBLE HEALTH RISKS are involved in the following simple pastimes:-
1) Reading newspapers
2) Going to the movies
3) Watching TV
4) Letting your kids read teen magazines
5) Listening to mainstream radio stations
In short: all the most popular and time-consuming leisure activities! And increasingly, these activities are becoming ever more removed from the real-world. We rely on our media sources to bring us snapshots of the entire range of news stories that are taking place 'out there' in the big, wide world. We place our total trust in them to do so. But you know what? That trust has been betrayed - and it HAS been for several DECADES.
Forget about global warming. Forget about Al Quaida. Forget about the Taliban. Forget about Iran's nuclear program. Forget about the skinheads in Russia. Forget about genetically-modified foods. Forget about the value of the dollar. Forget about the home-loan crisis. Forget about cancer, forget about strokes, heart attacks, diabetes, emphasema, deep-vein thrombosis, baldness, pesticides, bird flu, virus-carrying mosquitoes and EVERY OTHER GODDAMN THING THE JEWISH MEDIA DREAMS UP LIKE RODEO CLOWNS to divert our attention from what's really going on!
Gentle reader, by FAR the biggest and most serious threat you and your family will ever have to face are the machinations of the Jews in the Western media and in our so-called Western governments - which, incredible as it seems, ultimately take their orders not from you or me, but from Israel. This threat is HUGE and it is total POISON to society and far, far worse for you and yours than any tangible threat that might arise from some new breed of insect being able to spread AIDS, or Cuba developing nuclear missiles, or whatever else you got.
If we can't BAN television or cinema outright in America (YET!) then we need to enforce the following warning before every TV show or movie screening: "The following feature is highly likely to DAMAGE YOUR BRAIN and POISON YOUR CHILDREN'S MINDS." which is, after all, a hell of a lot more truthful than the current version: "the following feature has been declared suitable for ALL AUDIENCES by the Motion Picture Association of America."
One final point: though the Jew regards his TV media poison as entirely suitable for consumption by OUR kids, his OWN are not permitted to view it, for the Jew knows its dangers. The Jews - an extremely family-orientated people - are very circumspect about allowing potentially deadly cultural influences into the home, so TV is a very rare sight indeed in any Hisadic Jewish home. If it's present at all, it's invariably switched off!
In this way, the Jew is analogous to the drug dealer in the school yard who would never dream of selling drugs to his own children; or the burger-vendor who minces up any old fatty gristle for his customers, but only feeds his own kids on the very finest prime cuts.
It's the world's worst-kept secret. The Jews are total poison to decent society. And this is a fact that (thanks to the Internet) is now becoming ever more widely recognized. Jews are poison. Their Agenda is poison. Tell everyone you know: your kids, their friends, your workmates, your workmates' kids, cops in the street. Tell EVERYONE. Tell them all NOW and for as long as you have breath in your body, KEEP TELLING THEM.
Tuesday, October 9, 2007
Why the Jews cannot be trusted to run the media
Phaedrus recently finished reading the autobiography of one of America’s greatest ever citizens: Benjamin Franklin.
But there’s a curious problem with it. Whilst Franklin was very Jew-sceptic, no direct references to the Jews could be found in this suspiciously slim volume. Franklin describes an occasion when he had (unsatisfactory)dealings with a Jew, but the text makes no mention of the word and simply describes the person concerned as wearing his beard according to Mosaic law. How likely is this in reality?? It is clear the text ahs been edited. This edition describes itself as Franklin‘s "unabridged autobiography" so it seemed quite inexplicable how "Jews" could have been so carelessly omitted from it. At other times, we know Franklin was not nearly so PC! For example, here’s one of Franklin’s best-known quotes from his address to the earliest American legislators:
"There is a great danger for the United States of America. That great danger is the Jew. Gentlemen , in whichever land the Jews have settled, they have depressed the moral level and lowered the degree of commercial honesty. They have created a State within a State, and when they are opposed, they attempted to strangle the nation financially as in the case of Portugal and Spain."
"For more than 1700 years they have lamented their sorrowful fate, namely that they were driven out of the motherland; but gentlemen, if the civilized world today should give them back Palestine as their property , they would immediately find pressing reasons for not returning there. Why? Because they are vampires and cannot live on other vampires. They cannot live among themselves. They must live among Christians and others who do not belong to their race."
"If they are not excluded from the United States by the Constitution, within less than a hundred years they will stream into our country in such numbers that they will rule and destroy us, and change our form of government for which Americans have shed their blood and sacrificed life, property and personal freedom. If the Jews are not excluded, within 200 years our children will be working in the fields to feed the Jews, while they remain in the Counting House gleefully rubbing their hands."
"I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jews forever, your children`s children will curse you in your graves."
"Their ideas are not those of Americans. The leopard cannot change his spots. The Jews are a danger to this land, and if they are allowed to enter, they will imperil its institutions."
"They should be excluded by the Constitution."
One may therefore infer from this that Franklin was quite passionate about his views of the Jew! So why no references to Jews in his so-called "autobiography"? The copy Phaedrus had obtained had INDEED, been 'edited' by the Jewish publishing house that printed it. This is a very common tactic and goes a good way to explaining why the Jews have this obsession with ownership and control of TV, radio and publishing. Another notable example of this gerrymandering with the truth was after World War 2 when they re-printed hundreds of thousands of copies of Hitler’s Mein Kampf! A curious thing for the Jews to do, one might imagine, until one is informed that the 'Jewish edition' had removed all references to the basis of Hitler’s antisemitism. It was quite impossible to discern from the Jewish edition exactly what the Jews had done to warrant such dreadful treatment under the Nazis. They really APPEARED to be innocent victims.
The lessons are clear. Since 96% of the world’s media is today controlled by Jews (source: Jew Watch) we cannot trust it to inform us of what’s really going on and provide any insight into why the world is the screwed-up place that it is. So let’s not waste any more time watching Fox News, CBC, the BBC or CNN. These organizations are Jew-controlled, just like virtually all our newspapers, radio stations and magazines are. THE MEDIA DEMONSTRABLY CANNOT BE TRUSTED.
But there’s a curious problem with it. Whilst Franklin was very Jew-sceptic, no direct references to the Jews could be found in this suspiciously slim volume. Franklin describes an occasion when he had (unsatisfactory)dealings with a Jew, but the text makes no mention of the word and simply describes the person concerned as wearing his beard according to Mosaic law. How likely is this in reality?? It is clear the text ahs been edited. This edition describes itself as Franklin‘s "unabridged autobiography" so it seemed quite inexplicable how "Jews" could have been so carelessly omitted from it. At other times, we know Franklin was not nearly so PC! For example, here’s one of Franklin’s best-known quotes from his address to the earliest American legislators:
"There is a great danger for the United States of America. That great danger is the Jew. Gentlemen , in whichever land the Jews have settled, they have depressed the moral level and lowered the degree of commercial honesty. They have created a State within a State, and when they are opposed, they attempted to strangle the nation financially as in the case of Portugal and Spain."
"For more than 1700 years they have lamented their sorrowful fate, namely that they were driven out of the motherland; but gentlemen, if the civilized world today should give them back Palestine as their property , they would immediately find pressing reasons for not returning there. Why? Because they are vampires and cannot live on other vampires. They cannot live among themselves. They must live among Christians and others who do not belong to their race."
"If they are not excluded from the United States by the Constitution, within less than a hundred years they will stream into our country in such numbers that they will rule and destroy us, and change our form of government for which Americans have shed their blood and sacrificed life, property and personal freedom. If the Jews are not excluded, within 200 years our children will be working in the fields to feed the Jews, while they remain in the Counting House gleefully rubbing their hands."
"I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jews forever, your children`s children will curse you in your graves."
"Their ideas are not those of Americans. The leopard cannot change his spots. The Jews are a danger to this land, and if they are allowed to enter, they will imperil its institutions."
"They should be excluded by the Constitution."
One may therefore infer from this that Franklin was quite passionate about his views of the Jew! So why no references to Jews in his so-called "autobiography"? The copy Phaedrus had obtained had INDEED, been 'edited' by the Jewish publishing house that printed it. This is a very common tactic and goes a good way to explaining why the Jews have this obsession with ownership and control of TV, radio and publishing. Another notable example of this gerrymandering with the truth was after World War 2 when they re-printed hundreds of thousands of copies of Hitler’s Mein Kampf! A curious thing for the Jews to do, one might imagine, until one is informed that the 'Jewish edition' had removed all references to the basis of Hitler’s antisemitism. It was quite impossible to discern from the Jewish edition exactly what the Jews had done to warrant such dreadful treatment under the Nazis. They really APPEARED to be innocent victims.
The lessons are clear. Since 96% of the world’s media is today controlled by Jews (source: Jew Watch) we cannot trust it to inform us of what’s really going on and provide any insight into why the world is the screwed-up place that it is. So let’s not waste any more time watching Fox News, CBC, the BBC or CNN. These organizations are Jew-controlled, just like virtually all our newspapers, radio stations and magazines are. THE MEDIA DEMONSTRABLY CANNOT BE TRUSTED.
Saturday, September 15, 2007
Fired and vilified - for advocating motherhood!
Here's a story from Germany that's enough to make Jayne Gardener's blood boil.
Eva Herman, a news anchor woman for the German TV channel NDR has been sacked for upholding family values. Ms. Herman, 48, who has worked for NDR since 1988 made the innocuous comment out of working hours in a bookstore during a book signing session.
She innocently observed:
"Not everything was terrible during that [1930s] time; one good thing was that the value of families sticking together and the role of the mother was appreciated."
Seems harmless enough, doesn't it? And not even stated on-air, either. Yet it has led to her instant dismissal after 19 years of faithful service! Not only that, but the story has been splashed on the front pages of Germany's tabloids and labeled as a "Nazi Scandal" which is clearly is NOT.
Having been branded as a Nazi sympathizer by the country's Jewish-controlled media will no doubt make it extremely difficult for Ms. Herman to find another job in her chosen career, particularly in this most culturally brow-beaten of all countries. From such a harsh lesson, the message is clear. Don't you ever, ever even think about questioning the 'new values' being put across on TV and in the newspapers. The whole process of re-engineering how we think about society's issues is not even up for discussion. You will parrot the party line or find yourself out on your ear.
Eva Herman, a news anchor woman for the German TV channel NDR has been sacked for upholding family values. Ms. Herman, 48, who has worked for NDR since 1988 made the innocuous comment out of working hours in a bookstore during a book signing session.
She innocently observed:
"Not everything was terrible during that [1930s] time; one good thing was that the value of families sticking together and the role of the mother was appreciated."
Seems harmless enough, doesn't it? And not even stated on-air, either. Yet it has led to her instant dismissal after 19 years of faithful service! Not only that, but the story has been splashed on the front pages of Germany's tabloids and labeled as a "Nazi Scandal" which is clearly is NOT.
Having been branded as a Nazi sympathizer by the country's Jewish-controlled media will no doubt make it extremely difficult for Ms. Herman to find another job in her chosen career, particularly in this most culturally brow-beaten of all countries. From such a harsh lesson, the message is clear. Don't you ever, ever even think about questioning the 'new values' being put across on TV and in the newspapers. The whole process of re-engineering how we think about society's issues is not even up for discussion. You will parrot the party line or find yourself out on your ear.
Tuesday, September 11, 2007
You Must be Evil
This song is from Chris Rea´s best-selling album, The Road to Hell...
I come home from work
I see my little girl
She's crying on the floor
She's been watching that TV
This ain't late no, this ain't even dinner time
To show them things on that screen
What's wrong with you
You must be evil
Oh I know why you do it
You're just looking for sensation
You got a hold of something
You tell us that it's news
You don't have to show that stuff
Can't you show us some respect
You can tell us we don't need to see it
We don't need those cheap effects
You must be evil
You must be evil
I wish you were here
You don't have to show that stuff
You ain't fooling no-one
You made my little girl cry
I wish you were here
We all know why you do it
Sometimes you even slow it down
You're giving out some bad ideas here
I can't believe that you don't realise
You must be evil
I come home from work
I see my little girl
She's crying on the floor
She's been watching that TV
This ain't late no, this ain't even dinner time
To show them things on that screen
What's wrong with you
You must be evil
Oh I know why you do it
You're just looking for sensation
You got a hold of something
You tell us that it's news
You don't have to show that stuff
Can't you show us some respect
You can tell us we don't need to see it
We don't need those cheap effects
You must be evil
You must be evil
I wish you were here
You don't have to show that stuff
You ain't fooling no-one
You made my little girl cry
I wish you were here
We all know why you do it
Sometimes you even slow it down
You're giving out some bad ideas here
I can't believe that you don't realise
You must be evil
Saturday, August 25, 2007
Jews silence another blogger
Alentus Internet Corporation has just informed one of it's customers, one Arthur Topham, that it can no longer host his site, the Radical Press. This disturbing item below has been plucked from The Radical Press's website. Mr. Topham's spirited response to the news that his site was being pulled makes for inspiring reading...
Article begins:
And so here we have another case of sad but true. Freedom of expression on the net in Canada is only a relative concept and subject to approval by the Jews who actually run this country. I refer to the B’nai B’rith, the Canadian Jewish Congress, the Anti-Defacation League (for they are an anal group of assholes, no?), the Anti-Racist Action goons and all the other Jew orgs and affiliated groups who support limiting freedom of expression and controlling the minds of those dumbed-down goofball Canuck goyim.
Just how long I’ll be online (should Jonathan catch a glimpse of this critique) is anyone’s guess. There are servers in the states yet where I shall likely go and give my hard-earned Canadian dollars so that I can continue to publish. The next step will be the Jew-controlled Canadian Human Rights Commission threatening to send me to Germany for a stay with Ernst and Germar. Perhaps I should say that the Jewish Holocaust is a bunch of Jewish shit that they’ve been stuffing in the face of the world since the Commies (read Jews) took over the camps in 1945. Maybe that will get their ire up, eh? :-)
Whatever. As MacArthur (bless his soul) once said, “I shall return.” Arthur Topham, Editor. The Radical Press.
My reply to Alentus is posted below their ultimatum.]
———————————
Jonathan Ritter8/24/07 2:19 PM jritter@alentus.com
Re: Customer - The Radical Press (6061), radicalpress.com
Hello Arthur,
I am writing to let you know that Alentus is no longer able to provide hosting services to you.
Your hosting services will be terminated as of 1700 hours MDT on August 31, 2007.
Regards,
Jonathan Ritter
President and CEO
Alentus Corporation
750, 10909 Jasper Avenue
Edmonton, Alberta T5J3L9
——————————–
Friday evening,
August 25th, 2007
Dear Jonathan.
Thank you for the heads up. I will make the necessary arrangements to ensure that I have all my work and files transferred to a reputable server by 1700 hours MDT on August 31, 2007.
Your actions betray the fact that Alentus Corporation is just another server under the domination and control of the Jews.
These control freaks aren’t content with owning and manipulating the print media, the television, the movie industry, the publishing industry, the porn industry, the booze industry and so on. They damn well know that the Internet is their Achilles Heel in terms of free people honestly expressing their opinions and their ideas, especially if these opinions differ with the Jew’s occult agenda and the exposure their demented efforts to thwart all free expression of ideas which criticize their greed, megalomania and political agenda for total global control of all aspects of our lives.
Congratulations Jonathan. You now join the infamous ranks of all those companies who have succumbed to the bullshit that the B’nai B’rith and the Canadian Jewish Congress and the Anti-Defamation League have been feeding Canadians for decades upon decades in their incessant effort to manipulate Canadian consciousness and protect their own diabolical actions. You can feel proud of yourself for having sold out your soul and your country to a group of international elitists who don’t give a flying fuck about you, Canada or the fragile democracy that we, as a nation, fought so damned hard and shed so much needless blood to achieve.
The innate freedom of human beings to express their thoughts on whatever topic they wish is one of the fundamental rights of a true and real democracy.
You might consider the fact that even the Jew created organization known as the United Nations explicitly states in Article 19 of the UN Human Rights Charter: “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”
Your complicity with those who would suppress thought for personal power and monetary gain and your deliberate interference with my rights in refusing to host my website places you and your company in the same camp of enemies of democracy as any other fascist/communist/totalitarian dictatorship where human dignity and independent expression are ground into the dirt by the bloody heel of repression, ignorance and power-crazed greed.
So have a nice life and make lots of money, eh?
Arthur Topham
Article begins:
And so here we have another case of sad but true. Freedom of expression on the net in Canada is only a relative concept and subject to approval by the Jews who actually run this country. I refer to the B’nai B’rith, the Canadian Jewish Congress, the Anti-Defacation League (for they are an anal group of assholes, no?), the Anti-Racist Action goons and all the other Jew orgs and affiliated groups who support limiting freedom of expression and controlling the minds of those dumbed-down goofball Canuck goyim.
Just how long I’ll be online (should Jonathan catch a glimpse of this critique) is anyone’s guess. There are servers in the states yet where I shall likely go and give my hard-earned Canadian dollars so that I can continue to publish. The next step will be the Jew-controlled Canadian Human Rights Commission threatening to send me to Germany for a stay with Ernst and Germar. Perhaps I should say that the Jewish Holocaust is a bunch of Jewish shit that they’ve been stuffing in the face of the world since the Commies (read Jews) took over the camps in 1945. Maybe that will get their ire up, eh? :-)
Whatever. As MacArthur (bless his soul) once said, “I shall return.” Arthur Topham, Editor. The Radical Press.
My reply to Alentus is posted below their ultimatum.]
———————————
Jonathan Ritter8/24/07 2:19 PM jritter@alentus.com
Re: Customer - The Radical Press (6061), radicalpress.com
Hello Arthur,
I am writing to let you know that Alentus is no longer able to provide hosting services to you.
Your hosting services will be terminated as of 1700 hours MDT on August 31, 2007.
Regards,
Jonathan Ritter
President and CEO
Alentus Corporation
750, 10909 Jasper Avenue
Edmonton, Alberta T5J3L9
——————————–
Friday evening,
August 25th, 2007
Dear Jonathan.
Thank you for the heads up. I will make the necessary arrangements to ensure that I have all my work and files transferred to a reputable server by 1700 hours MDT on August 31, 2007.
Your actions betray the fact that Alentus Corporation is just another server under the domination and control of the Jews.
These control freaks aren’t content with owning and manipulating the print media, the television, the movie industry, the publishing industry, the porn industry, the booze industry and so on. They damn well know that the Internet is their Achilles Heel in terms of free people honestly expressing their opinions and their ideas, especially if these opinions differ with the Jew’s occult agenda and the exposure their demented efforts to thwart all free expression of ideas which criticize their greed, megalomania and political agenda for total global control of all aspects of our lives.
Congratulations Jonathan. You now join the infamous ranks of all those companies who have succumbed to the bullshit that the B’nai B’rith and the Canadian Jewish Congress and the Anti-Defamation League have been feeding Canadians for decades upon decades in their incessant effort to manipulate Canadian consciousness and protect their own diabolical actions. You can feel proud of yourself for having sold out your soul and your country to a group of international elitists who don’t give a flying fuck about you, Canada or the fragile democracy that we, as a nation, fought so damned hard and shed so much needless blood to achieve.
The innate freedom of human beings to express their thoughts on whatever topic they wish is one of the fundamental rights of a true and real democracy.
You might consider the fact that even the Jew created organization known as the United Nations explicitly states in Article 19 of the UN Human Rights Charter: “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”
Your complicity with those who would suppress thought for personal power and monetary gain and your deliberate interference with my rights in refusing to host my website places you and your company in the same camp of enemies of democracy as any other fascist/communist/totalitarian dictatorship where human dignity and independent expression are ground into the dirt by the bloody heel of repression, ignorance and power-crazed greed.
So have a nice life and make lots of money, eh?
Arthur Topham
CNN's latest progaganda: God's Warriors
Phaedrus, like countless others, has just wasted 6 hours of his life watching this pile of crap from Cable Jews Network. Have YOU seen it? No? You are fortunate indeed. This concise summary of just one paragraph will take about 2 minutes to read and save you 5hr.58m of your valuable time and won't insult your intellect like the original. Here's the synopsis:
Basically, 99% of Arabs are ruthless terrorists who will happily kill anyone, women, children and the disabled included, in cold blood to get a free ticket to paradise. On the other hand, only about 1.5% of Jews were terrorists but they've since renounced violence. The Jews didn't get Israel through terrorism (let's conveniently forget the atrocities of Stern and Irgun shall we) and in reality only sort-of-half-swindled the Palestinians out of it with a few slick tricks. And anyway God gave them the land (it says so in Genesis) and who would dare question the Bible?
Further, the Jews enjoy tremendous support from evangelical Christians who concur that the foundation of Israel was a major step in the path to the realization of God's Plan. The Arabs are all bastards and the Jews and the Christians are in full agreement on this. When the end of the world comes and the Messiah appears to redeem the True Believers, he might be Jewish or he might be Christian, but he certainly won't be Islamic for CNN has spoken!!!
Incredibly, dear reader, that is the sum total of this embarrassingly pointless three-part series. Phaedrus was somewhat confused after watching it, because the Jews and the Christians are being portrayed as best buddies-in-arms in a just fight against Muslims, who are all evil hate-mongers and suicide bombers.
Reality check please! Phaedrus personally knows NO Christians that have anything but a healthy contempt for the Jews. Even Jesus (Jewish himself) said that the Jews were of their father: the Devil. That doesn't sound like a ringing endorsement of Judaism - from one who would clearly know - does it?
Furthermore, Phaedrus would like to point out that though he has met countless Arabs, he has never yet met one who was in any way discourtious or aggressive or whatever. Likewise, Phaedrus has met countless Jews. And uniquely, among all the foreign peoples of Phaedrus acquaintance, he has never, ever, met a nice Jew. Not even once. They have all, without exception, been (at best) slimy manipulators and exploitative back-stabbers who use a person for as long as it suits them and then dumps them.
No one likes to have to leave their kids by a complete stranger for so much as 5 minutes (it's every parent's worst nightmare) but with no foreknowledge of the potential trustees involved, and if there were no other option, Phaedrus would be far, far happier to leave his children with an unknown Arab than an unknown Jew by a very BIG margin.
One doesn't have to look too far for an explanation for God's Warriors, this epic theft of valuable time and Crime Against Truth: CNN is owned by AOL Time-Warner - 100% Jewish-owned - lock, stock and barrel. Now who would have guessed that, huh?
Basically, 99% of Arabs are ruthless terrorists who will happily kill anyone, women, children and the disabled included, in cold blood to get a free ticket to paradise. On the other hand, only about 1.5% of Jews were terrorists but they've since renounced violence. The Jews didn't get Israel through terrorism (let's conveniently forget the atrocities of Stern and Irgun shall we) and in reality only sort-of-half-swindled the Palestinians out of it with a few slick tricks. And anyway God gave them the land (it says so in Genesis) and who would dare question the Bible?
Further, the Jews enjoy tremendous support from evangelical Christians who concur that the foundation of Israel was a major step in the path to the realization of God's Plan. The Arabs are all bastards and the Jews and the Christians are in full agreement on this. When the end of the world comes and the Messiah appears to redeem the True Believers, he might be Jewish or he might be Christian, but he certainly won't be Islamic for CNN has spoken!!!
Incredibly, dear reader, that is the sum total of this embarrassingly pointless three-part series. Phaedrus was somewhat confused after watching it, because the Jews and the Christians are being portrayed as best buddies-in-arms in a just fight against Muslims, who are all evil hate-mongers and suicide bombers.
Reality check please! Phaedrus personally knows NO Christians that have anything but a healthy contempt for the Jews. Even Jesus (Jewish himself) said that the Jews were of their father: the Devil. That doesn't sound like a ringing endorsement of Judaism - from one who would clearly know - does it?
Furthermore, Phaedrus would like to point out that though he has met countless Arabs, he has never yet met one who was in any way discourtious or aggressive or whatever. Likewise, Phaedrus has met countless Jews. And uniquely, among all the foreign peoples of Phaedrus acquaintance, he has never, ever, met a nice Jew. Not even once. They have all, without exception, been (at best) slimy manipulators and exploitative back-stabbers who use a person for as long as it suits them and then dumps them.
No one likes to have to leave their kids by a complete stranger for so much as 5 minutes (it's every parent's worst nightmare) but with no foreknowledge of the potential trustees involved, and if there were no other option, Phaedrus would be far, far happier to leave his children with an unknown Arab than an unknown Jew by a very BIG margin.
One doesn't have to look too far for an explanation for God's Warriors, this epic theft of valuable time and Crime Against Truth: CNN is owned by AOL Time-Warner - 100% Jewish-owned - lock, stock and barrel. Now who would have guessed that, huh?
Wednesday, August 22, 2007
Modernize!
That's the clarion call from the media nowadays. We are constantly being urged to abandon the old and embrace change. And this call is being echoed by powerful and insistent voices within Western governments too. Retaining conservative values is painted as old fashioned and stuffy. Rather, we should welcome new, "trendy values" that in the past we may have been foolish enough to fear.
The curious thing, however, is that almost all the "new values" we are being urged to adopt are utterly poisonous to society. Concepts such as uncontrolled immigration and multiculturalism; inter-racial relationships, "black is beautiful," homosexuality, lesbianism, one-parent families, the effacing of Christianity, the prevalence of pornography, the pursuit of transient fame and the obsession with 'celebrity culture' are all, without exception, utter garbage and totally worthless.
The qualities of diligence, hard work, moral standards and honesty that made this once-great country what it once was and could be again are eschewed and in their place we are being sold a crock of shit. This is no accident. It is all part of the Zionist agenda and more and more people are waking up to this fact, thanks to the Internet. In fact recent studies in Britain have shown that parents within normal, healthy families are quietly telling their kids not to pay any heed to the garbage values espoused by the mass media in that country and the kids are (thank God) taking that message on board.
It is heartening to learn that despite decades of attempted brain-washing by Britain's Jew-controlled media, the broad mass of the people recognize that political-correctness is a poisonous, nonsensical concept that will wreck society over time and that regardless of what anyone tells them, they are not prepared to have their children grow up believing such dangerous bullshit. The reports caused some considerable dismay within the Labour government and there were calls from some MPs to do something to "tackle the problem." Quite what such measures might amount to is beyond Phaedrus' imagination. Thankfully, it remains inconceivable that ANY agency could interpose itself between parents and their children!
From our point of view, then, our proper course of action is clear. We should loudly reject and repudiate everything that is being forced on us by our Jewish masters in Washington and elsewhere. Speak out fearlessly against homosexuality. Proclaim loudly that it is a wicked and disgusting practice and that those who indulge in it are sick and twisted individuals. Speak out against inter-racial relationships, for no good ever comes to the white partner who is foolish enough to engage in a relationship with a Negro. Such relationships ALWAYS end in tears - and very frequently far worse. Speak out against immigration and moves that would increase it, such as the formation of an American Union or free trade area. Shout your views from the rooftops. And above all, tell your children. TELL THEM LOUD AND TELL THEM OFTEN.
The curious thing, however, is that almost all the "new values" we are being urged to adopt are utterly poisonous to society. Concepts such as uncontrolled immigration and multiculturalism; inter-racial relationships, "black is beautiful," homosexuality, lesbianism, one-parent families, the effacing of Christianity, the prevalence of pornography, the pursuit of transient fame and the obsession with 'celebrity culture' are all, without exception, utter garbage and totally worthless.
The qualities of diligence, hard work, moral standards and honesty that made this once-great country what it once was and could be again are eschewed and in their place we are being sold a crock of shit. This is no accident. It is all part of the Zionist agenda and more and more people are waking up to this fact, thanks to the Internet. In fact recent studies in Britain have shown that parents within normal, healthy families are quietly telling their kids not to pay any heed to the garbage values espoused by the mass media in that country and the kids are (thank God) taking that message on board.
It is heartening to learn that despite decades of attempted brain-washing by Britain's Jew-controlled media, the broad mass of the people recognize that political-correctness is a poisonous, nonsensical concept that will wreck society over time and that regardless of what anyone tells them, they are not prepared to have their children grow up believing such dangerous bullshit. The reports caused some considerable dismay within the Labour government and there were calls from some MPs to do something to "tackle the problem." Quite what such measures might amount to is beyond Phaedrus' imagination. Thankfully, it remains inconceivable that ANY agency could interpose itself between parents and their children!
From our point of view, then, our proper course of action is clear. We should loudly reject and repudiate everything that is being forced on us by our Jewish masters in Washington and elsewhere. Speak out fearlessly against homosexuality. Proclaim loudly that it is a wicked and disgusting practice and that those who indulge in it are sick and twisted individuals. Speak out against inter-racial relationships, for no good ever comes to the white partner who is foolish enough to engage in a relationship with a Negro. Such relationships ALWAYS end in tears - and very frequently far worse. Speak out against immigration and moves that would increase it, such as the formation of an American Union or free trade area. Shout your views from the rooftops. And above all, tell your children. TELL THEM LOUD AND TELL THEM OFTEN.
Monday, August 20, 2007
It’s either us or them. It’s as simple as that.
The Jews are out to destroy us. They plan to wipe us out not with a bang, but with a whimper (as the saying goes). The stakes are at an all-time high and this current level of tension is unlikely ever to be re-visited in the lifetimes of our children, or our children’s children.
Jews enjoy heretofore unprecedented power in the Western world today. All their long-cherished dreams and ultimate goals were about to be realized when (thank God!) the Internet came along and really screwed things up for them. Don’t count on any such Divine intervention in the future, however; this is the last chance we’re ever likely to get. And if we blow THIS one, then in all honesty perhaps we DO indeed DESERVE to be inter-bred into slaves for the Jews (plain and simple Darwinism in action)...
At the present time, as in many, many prior eras, the Jews control the government, the media, the judiciary, the monetary system, equities, the price of commodities and everything else of any relevance in the world today. Though they continually claim to be acting in our best interests, they are in fact only acting in their OWN, which is all they have EVER done throughout ALL of recorded history.
Since AD. 250, the Jews have been kicked out of 109 different places around the world. They are NOT a misunderstood, persecuted minority as they would have us believe; they are total POISON to decent societies and have been dealt with accordingly and will be again soon here, too (by God’s grace).
Let’s expose what they do with their power today in the mass media they control. Firstly, they encourage young and often underage white girls to engage in sexual relations with older black men and black youths. They encourage this behavior with the foreknowledge that no good ever comes of it to our race. This is not negligence or happenstance; it’s intentional. And if a subnormal fetus arises from this union – as it all too often does - then so much the better for the Jew, for it results in a retarded life-form - a future acquiescent slave and/or progenitor thereof. Better still if the white female becomes sterile from a sexual disease arising out of the encounter, because the Jew is dedicated to wiping out white Europeans and is continually working towards this goal. Our people are the only realistic challenger to Jewish supremacy and anyone that's too smart is a threat to the New World Order and must be eliminated one way or another.
The Jews use their complete control of the media to extol the virtues of homosexual relations and inter-racial relationships; that they are not in the least abnormal and are simply ”modern” and that anyone who doesn’t agree is either ”old-fashioned” or (here step through several shades of insults on a predetermined scale) some evil Nazi sociopath.
They encourage young white girls of as little as 11 years of age to despise themselves via impossible-to-achieve role models of feminine slimness; thereby weakening their self-esteem and making them more likely to accept inferior genetic phenotypes (such as Negroes) as sexual partners. This is an utterly VILE crime against the sanctity of childhood and much else besides.
They use their power in politics to ensure that year-by-year, academic standards in public schools across the USA and Europe fall imperceptibly lower until - over decades - the kids are fed little more than hog-mush by way of learning. In this way their position is less threatened than it otherwise would be from confident, self-assertive, educated adults who might question the legitimacy of this utterly bizarre state-of-affairs. Russia is one of the few remaining countries to have bucked this trend which is why it is under constant attack from Zionists and their cronies both here in the US and in Europe. They plan to create a New World Order and if it is to succeed, it requires ALL developed countries to fall in line. Just ONE renegade, no matter how small, and the whole project is threatened. And Russia ain't small!
Their global media interests enable them to oust any decent, educative forms of entertainment in favor of garbage TV series like Friends, Sex in the City, or American Idol where academically-bright students are continually tempted to throw away a promising career in the hope of achieving transitory, worthless celebrity status; thereby prostituting their future for a worthless pile of ephemeral shit. As washed-up has-beens by the age of 25 and having thrown their futures away, they will never be in a position to threaten the Jew by breaking into the higher professions successfully.
They pollute the TV channels they control with base pornography. Anything to convince the unwitting viewer to mix his/her genes with those of a different race. It is at once both sickening and criminal that we should have to suffer these outrages in our country today. Mixing the bloodline is something that the Jews constantly encourage OUR people to do; yet feel it within their own race to be the most despicable betrayal of all. Many Rabbis maintain that to marry-out from The Jewish Faith is every bit as fatal to the Tribe as was the so-called Holocaust. Curious double standards, it seems.
The next time you see Niggers cavorting with young white women in a sexually-suggestive fashion on MTV or TRL, just remember that there’s an agenda at work here. It’s no accident. It’s not fashionable. It’s not normal. It’s poison. It’s a poison in our children’s minds that must be eradicated. Control of the media must be stripped from the Jews, as must control of much else besides. There is no excuse for failure.
Jews enjoy heretofore unprecedented power in the Western world today. All their long-cherished dreams and ultimate goals were about to be realized when (thank God!) the Internet came along and really screwed things up for them. Don’t count on any such Divine intervention in the future, however; this is the last chance we’re ever likely to get. And if we blow THIS one, then in all honesty perhaps we DO indeed DESERVE to be inter-bred into slaves for the Jews (plain and simple Darwinism in action)...
At the present time, as in many, many prior eras, the Jews control the government, the media, the judiciary, the monetary system, equities, the price of commodities and everything else of any relevance in the world today. Though they continually claim to be acting in our best interests, they are in fact only acting in their OWN, which is all they have EVER done throughout ALL of recorded history.
Since AD. 250, the Jews have been kicked out of 109 different places around the world. They are NOT a misunderstood, persecuted minority as they would have us believe; they are total POISON to decent societies and have been dealt with accordingly and will be again soon here, too (by God’s grace).
Let’s expose what they do with their power today in the mass media they control. Firstly, they encourage young and often underage white girls to engage in sexual relations with older black men and black youths. They encourage this behavior with the foreknowledge that no good ever comes of it to our race. This is not negligence or happenstance; it’s intentional. And if a subnormal fetus arises from this union – as it all too often does - then so much the better for the Jew, for it results in a retarded life-form - a future acquiescent slave and/or progenitor thereof. Better still if the white female becomes sterile from a sexual disease arising out of the encounter, because the Jew is dedicated to wiping out white Europeans and is continually working towards this goal. Our people are the only realistic challenger to Jewish supremacy and anyone that's too smart is a threat to the New World Order and must be eliminated one way or another.
The Jews use their complete control of the media to extol the virtues of homosexual relations and inter-racial relationships; that they are not in the least abnormal and are simply ”modern” and that anyone who doesn’t agree is either ”old-fashioned” or (here step through several shades of insults on a predetermined scale) some evil Nazi sociopath.
They encourage young white girls of as little as 11 years of age to despise themselves via impossible-to-achieve role models of feminine slimness; thereby weakening their self-esteem and making them more likely to accept inferior genetic phenotypes (such as Negroes) as sexual partners. This is an utterly VILE crime against the sanctity of childhood and much else besides.
They use their power in politics to ensure that year-by-year, academic standards in public schools across the USA and Europe fall imperceptibly lower until - over decades - the kids are fed little more than hog-mush by way of learning. In this way their position is less threatened than it otherwise would be from confident, self-assertive, educated adults who might question the legitimacy of this utterly bizarre state-of-affairs. Russia is one of the few remaining countries to have bucked this trend which is why it is under constant attack from Zionists and their cronies both here in the US and in Europe. They plan to create a New World Order and if it is to succeed, it requires ALL developed countries to fall in line. Just ONE renegade, no matter how small, and the whole project is threatened. And Russia ain't small!
Their global media interests enable them to oust any decent, educative forms of entertainment in favor of garbage TV series like Friends, Sex in the City, or American Idol where academically-bright students are continually tempted to throw away a promising career in the hope of achieving transitory, worthless celebrity status; thereby prostituting their future for a worthless pile of ephemeral shit. As washed-up has-beens by the age of 25 and having thrown their futures away, they will never be in a position to threaten the Jew by breaking into the higher professions successfully.
They pollute the TV channels they control with base pornography. Anything to convince the unwitting viewer to mix his/her genes with those of a different race. It is at once both sickening and criminal that we should have to suffer these outrages in our country today. Mixing the bloodline is something that the Jews constantly encourage OUR people to do; yet feel it within their own race to be the most despicable betrayal of all. Many Rabbis maintain that to marry-out from The Jewish Faith is every bit as fatal to the Tribe as was the so-called Holocaust. Curious double standards, it seems.
The next time you see Niggers cavorting with young white women in a sexually-suggestive fashion on MTV or TRL, just remember that there’s an agenda at work here. It’s no accident. It’s not fashionable. It’s not normal. It’s poison. It’s a poison in our children’s minds that must be eradicated. Control of the media must be stripped from the Jews, as must control of much else besides. There is no excuse for failure.
Thursday, August 9, 2007
Yet More Crap from the BBC
From BBC World:
“Call for black role models scheme.
“Black boys need positive role models from within their own communities to tackle underachievement, a Report concludes.
“The REACH panel of experts from fields including education and business, says too often role models for young black men include rappers who glamorize guns.
“The Report says the problem could cost the UK $60bn over the coming years, in terms of lost tax receipts, incarceration and healthcare costs and expense to the Criminal Justice System.”
Well there you have it: this “panel of experts” has concluded its Study by finding that “role models for young black men include rappers who glamorize guns.”
Do we really need a “panel of experts” to tell us what we already know and have known for 30 years? In what way is this story newsworthy??
The BBC itself is one of the world’s biggest broadcasters and has been at the forefront of popularizing and promoting “gangsta-rap music” giving its exponents an unprecedented platform from which to extol the aberrant and abhorrent themes this odious medium of expression rejoices in.
Perhaps it’s not so much a question of more positive black role models (virtually none of whom exist anyway) but rather denying airtime to the negative black role models (to whom the BBC has been so strangely accommodating for so long)
But since this once august institution has been usurped by Jews hell-bent on destroying decent society at every level, Phaedrus believes the disgorging of anti-social gangsta rap sewage into the minds of children (and its ruinous consequences) will continue unabated for very many years to come.
Friday, June 29, 2007
CNN's Eye on Russia echoes Bush's criticism
All this week on CNN, Jim Clancy has been reporting in the daily feature called ‘Eye on Russia.’ Of course, since CNN is Jew-controlled (its parent company is the totally kosher AOL/Time/Warner) one has to treat its reporting in precisely that light.
Predictably, in virtually every daily update there has been some concern expressed by Clancy about Russia “backsliding on democracy” (translates as “making life difficult for power-hungry Jews”). On this occasion, the charge was that Russia has no free press. Phaedrus was aghast at this accusation, for it is demonstrably totally untrue. In fact Russia has the most desirable kind free press there is: a Jew-free one.
Predictably, in virtually every daily update there has been some concern expressed by Clancy about Russia “backsliding on democracy” (translates as “making life difficult for power-hungry Jews”). On this occasion, the charge was that Russia has no free press. Phaedrus was aghast at this accusation, for it is demonstrably totally untrue. In fact Russia has the most desirable kind free press there is: a Jew-free one.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
