Can Science Explain the Rise of the Jews?

.

From the outset, allow me to assure any Christians of the Fundamentalist persuasion who may be reading this, that nothing in what follows attempts in any way to undermine the Creation and that the theory hereby put forward is based upon mainstream science and is not disputed or denounced by religious leaders of ANY faith. This is a necessarily quite demanding essay to both write and to read. However, it is essential for the true scholar of the Jewish Problem to acquaint him/herself with. This is no hair-brained theory; it is solidly grounded in hard scientific study of the kind the Jews, for a number of reasons, are most nervous about, for it strays into the terrifying truths revealed by evolutionary biology...

Both Jews and Gentiles, are, in essence, biological entities that are in general terms merely somewhat more sophisticated animals than any other on the face of the planet. Of course, the Jews don't see it the same way as they believe they are superior beings to the rest of us. So this essay attempts to explain why the Jews have followed a separate evolutionary path with respect to everyone else and have as a result acquired their predominant, heritable racial characteristic: the insatiable craving for eye-wateringly vast wealth; for baubles, bangles and beads and everything that glitters.

It is a recurrent puzzle to the rest of us and the question is repeatedly aired on internet discussion groups: why do the Jews seek to enrich themselves beyond the boundaries of reason? Rational people constantly pose the question as to why the Jews feel the need to acquire, at such terrible cost to the planet and its various peoples, such absurdly vast fortunes? Why do they do this, well into old age and beyond, when as we all know, they cannot take their ill-got riches with them to the grave?

At first sight, this core characteristic of the Jewish people seems an impenetrable and insoluble conundrum. Many of us can name a Jew - not necessarily through personal acquaintance - who has spent his entire life building an immense fortune, yet has purchased with it not a single pennyworth of life. Examples of such individuals are innumerable throughout the ages and many will no doubt spring to every reader's mind. The question we attempt to answer here, however, is WHY? What IS the point of this boundless acquisitiveness and how did it come about?

As noted above, we are simply higher animals, and every bit as subject to the forces of evolution as any other animal beneath us. To understand the Jewish mindset, it is helpful to study a few species with which we share this planet, for we can see mirrored in their development, the same characteristics arising as have developed in the Children of Israel. The phenomenon under examination is what evolutionary biologists refer to as "runaway" (after the term coined by R. A. Fisher circa 1930) and it is surprisingly common in nature - and for many individual members of a species on such a track, it can prove ultimately FATAL. For the purposes of this recondite essay, Phaedrus proposes to briefly summarize the characteristics of a small selection of animals which all exhibit remarkably similar traits to that of the Jew. First up: the bower bird.

The bower bird builds elaborately large nests which are simply HUGE in proportion to the size and needs of the bird and its mate. The bird itself is nothing more in size than the common crow, yet its nest is sufficiently capacious for two adult humans to sit together in comfort! Moreover, the nest of the bower bird is exquisitely decorated with colorful berries which serve no other purpose than to act as ornamentation to impress any prospective mate. Furthermore, as these ornamental berries dry out and dull, the male bower bird makes periodic sorties into the forest to replace and rearrange them with fresher, brighter and shinier berries- all in an effort to keep up appearances. The female of the species selects her male partners on the basis of how large and well-decorated his nest is.

Next, consider pea-fowl. The male of the species (the peacock) is so overly encumbered with a vast spray of brightly colored, iridescent feathers that one might conclude it is unwisely advertising its presence to predators, thereby inviting its own destruction. However, the peahen considers such a display a highly desirable trait. Instinctively she knows that any male capable of surviving the burden of such a fantastic display at the risk of being run-down and eaten, must possess excellent genes which give rise to strong and healthy offspring. So she mates with the male with the best display. This is where Darwin's lesser-known theory of Sexual Selection strays into the 'handicap principle' zone. This is outside the scope of this essay but the interested reader may find his curiosity satisfied by a trawl through the appropriate Web resources.

Then there are a large number of species of long-tailed finches, which grow tail feathers so long and heavy that they can ultimately make it impossible for the male to leave the ground at all. In the case of the males with the longest, heaviest tales, predation is assured! And yet the female of the species will generally prefer the male with the life-threateningly long tail. Once again, however, contrary to common sense, the female knows best. She mates with the male with the longest and most cumbersome tale, because it is a powerful indicator of his strength and ability to avoid predation despite his heavily ornamental carriage of feathers. Scientists have proved this beyond question by attaching fake long feathers to the tails of some males and noting that the females choose the made-up males above the naturally well-endowed ones.

Two other species that share the same characteristic heavy ornamentation are the red-bellied stickleback and the rhinoceros beetle whose behaviors will not be expanded upon here for the sake of brevity, but the principle is exactly the same as the previous, avian cases examined above. And the foregoing examples are very far from comprising an exhaustive list.

All these species exhibit the 'runaway' behavior described by Fisher. They are so over elaborately ornamented/impeded that there is a very close trade-off between the securing of a mate on the one hand, and being able to escape a predator as a consequence of all the excessive ornamental baggage being carried on the other.
In most cases, the female of these species selects her mate in accordance with the 'handicap principle' which extends into human selection in the case of the Jews (whereupon it becomes highly dangerous to life on this planet.)

The handicap principle asserts that females prefer as mates those males which are able to exhibit outrageous wanton excess in their phenotypical forms; the characteristic of excessive 'redundancy' which most of the females (most notably the Jewish) find irresistibly compelling. It's an unfortunate selection preference in humans especially, because it is ruinous to our planet. It extends WAY beyond the harmless organic, decorative efforts of the bower bird and it is ugly in contrast to the beauty of the peacock's fan or the amazing iridescent coloration of the scarab beetle's shell.

In conclusion:

It is clear from the foregoing that the Jew and Jewess are nothing more than another example of the handicap principle in operation, albeit in the quasi-human domain. The Jew is as much a prisoner of his ancestry and his heritable traits as are the rest of us. The key difference, however, is that Jewish heritable traits are ruinous to the planet and society to an infinitely greater extent than our own are. The majority of we Gentiles do NOT put material wealth above everything else in our lives. The Jew, however, generally does. And even in those Jews who do not exhibit this behavioral trait during their lifetimes, the genes that carry it are still there, latent, yet merely in recession, ready to be awakened in the next or subsequent generations.

In the foregoing we can see that environmentally-ruinous Jewish behavioral traits are not merely a result of solely Talmudic teachings, but in something organic within their very beings. Phaedrus is no longer young; The light is growing dim, yet wisdom has never fled me. It has, to the contrary, only grown. It will be the task of the younger generation of people in the West and Russia to find a way to ensure that the Jew and its ruinous, debilitating genetic traits are never again permitted to de-rail the evolution of a decent, peaceful and prosperous society with just and moral values. That is the REAL challenge of the 21st Century.