Saturday, January 26, 2008
Whilst of course we all like to give generously to Jewi$h Charitie$ on the 27th of January, perhaps we should instead direct our contributions to the people of Palestine, who are suffering terrible privations at the hands of the Israeli Jews who are attempting to starve them into oblivion - a vile war crime which demands retribution from the proper authorities in the Hague. We need some international arrest warrants issued fast. Let's get these Zionazis put away for keeps.
The original Holocaust is history now. Whatever you believe happened back then (and it's so difficult to tell with all the conflicting opinions) it's long since over. the reparations have been paid and you can't bring back the dead. I would like to propose therefore that we all turn out attention to the on-going atrocities being committed against the Palestinians by Zionist Jews who continue to illegally occupy their land. This, dear reader, is the REAL Holocaust of our age and it's a LIVE issue taking place right NOW.
Background: when it was announced a few years ago that the Jews had successfully lobbied to have a special day of remembrance for those of their people killed during the most recent widespread European pogrom (now commonly called "the Holocaust") Phaedrus was deeply saddened. It seemed the Jews (or the most vocal among them at least) were determined to never allow the matter to rest and were continuing to extort reparations from innocent Germans, many of whom were not even born until long after the war ended.
The 20th century was the bloodiest time in human history and terrible atrocities were committed all over the world by all sides. Concentration camps had already been devised by the British in the Boer War some 30 years previously. Why do we need a day which solely commemorates the most recent Jewish pogrom, when the fact remains that the treatment meted out to the Jews and the losses they sustained were really not so great in the context of that blood-soaked century? Certainly other contemporary peoples fared FAR worse than the Jews - the Russian Kulaks in 1933/34 under Stalin to take just one example - yet bizarrely, the sufferings of those people and untold others remains unmarked.
Anyway, after my initial anger and dismay that this pointless charade had been approved and adopted by various governments - oh so long after the fact - I felt my revulsion for the whole thing waining. Perhaps it was a good thing, after all. Perhaps for the first time it would give truth-seekers the chance to discover the actual REASONS behind the Holocaust. All through my childhood and early adult years, I - like everyone else - had seen the plight of the semi-starved concentration camp prisoners and their dead friends and relatives being buried summarily in mass graves. Those images were deeply disturbing. Yet no explanation was ever forthcoming as to why the Germans did it.
Like most folks, when I watched those blurry old black and white films, the one question which continually cried out in my mind was why? WHY WHY??? But whilst the same footages were replayed over and over and over again throughout all the decades since, and we were constantly reminded how bestial the Nazis were for treating the Jews in such a way, no attempt was EVER made on the part of the documentary makers to get inside the minds of former camp guards and Nazi ideologists to pin them down and force them to attempt to justify their evil deeds.
Surely to God there had to be a REASON (even if it were a twisted and misguided one) for the manner in which the Jews had been treated. The pictures were so awful that it simply didn't make sense to leave the motivations behind the event unexplored. Not just unexplored, in fact, but totally sidelined. Of course, this was very many years ago before I went through my own 'epiphany moment' as to the true nature of the Jews, so back then I was simply baffled beyond belief as to why on earth the Germans (whom I believed to be among the world's most civilized and cultured people) should have behaved towards fellow human beings with such brutal callousness.
Even today, 70 years later, the mass media continues to avoid addressing this vital aspect of what had so angered the Germans about the Jews. I know that the broad mass of people alive today remain ignorant of exactly WHAT prompted the Germans to act in this extreme fashion. And it is in the nature of this blanket refusal to examine the CAUSES behind the Holocaust that the coals for another big pogrom which one can think of as "Holocaust II" are being ignited, for no one is being permitted to learn the vitally important lessons from last time around.
As the reader will see, I have used the term "Holocaust" and "the most recent big pogrom" interchangeably. I prefer the latter; it's more accurate, dispassionate and realistic, but I must recognize that the former has gained much currency (in more ways than one) so will continue to use both terms as the situation requires. Revisionism of the period is not considered here. There are far better qualified people out there than Phaedrus who can better estimate the TRUE numbers of Jews killed during the time-frame concerned and the manner in which they died. I shall leave that aspect aside as it is irrelevant for the purposes of this essay.
As I said above, I find the term "Holocaust" is unsatisfactory, because it implies some terrible ONE-OFF event which never happened before and probably never will again. It has therefore connotations of 'uniqueness.' However, in reality, it is far from unique. In fact, the plight of the Jews in Europe in the 1930s was simply the latest in a very long line of such episodes dating back thousands of years to Biblical times and probably even before that.
The Jewish people have a much-troubled antecedence. They simply do not get on with their neighbors and what is more they don't even try. Nazi occupied Europe was in fact the 108th place in the world that they had been roundly expelled from since 250 AD. One can safely infer from this inconvenient fact that it wasn't only the Germans who found the Jews intolerable. This wandering tribe of disingenuous nomads have done a very good job through their omnipresent media holdings in keeping this embarrassing little fact a closely-guarded secret. The full history of their numerous expulsions or "mini-Holocausts" if you like, is shown below:
YEAR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PLACE
250 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Carthage
415 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Alexandria
554 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Diocese of Clement (France
561 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Diocese of Uzzes (France)
612 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Visigoth Spain
642 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Visigoth Empire
855 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Italy
876 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Sens
1012 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mainz
1182 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - France
1182 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Germany
1276 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Upper Bavaria
1290 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - England
1306 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - France
1322 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - France (again)
1348 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Switzerland
1349 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hielbronn (Germany)
1349 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Saxony
1349 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hungary
1360 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hungary
1370 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Belgium
1380 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Slovakia
1388 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Strasbourg
1394 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Germany
1394 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - France
1420 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Lyons
1421 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Austria
1424 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Fribourg
1424 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Zurich
1424 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Cologne
1432 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Savoy
1438 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mainz
1439 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Augsburg
1442 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Netherlands
1444 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Netherlands
1446 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bavaria
1453 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - France
1453 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Breslau
1454 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Wurzburg
1462 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mainz
1483 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mainz
1484 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Warsaw
1485 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Vincenza (Italy)
1492 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Spain
1492 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Italy
1495 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Lithuania
1496 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Naples
1496 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Portugal
1498 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Nuremberg
1498 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Navarre
1510 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Brandenberg
1510 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Prussia
1514 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Strasbourg
1515 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Genoa
1519 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Regensburg
1533 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Naples
1541 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Naples
1542 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Prague & Bohemia
1550 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Genoa
1551 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bavaria
1555 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pesaro
1557 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Prague
1559 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Austria
1561 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Prague
1567 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Wurzburg
1569 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Papal States
1571 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Brandenburg
1582 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Netherlands
1582 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hungary
1593 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Brandenburg, Austria
1597 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Cremona, Pavia & Lodi
1614 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Frankfort
1615 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Worms
1619 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Kiev
1648 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ukraine
1648 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Poland
1649 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hamburg
1654 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Little Russia (Beylorus)
1656 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Lithuania
1669 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Oran (North Africa)
1669 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Vienna
1670 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Vienna
1712 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Sandomir
1727 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Russia
1738 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Wurtemburg
1740 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Little Russia (Beylorus)
1744 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Prague, Bohemia
1744 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Slovakia
1744 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Livonia
1745 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Moravia
1753 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Kovad (Lithuania)
1761 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bordeaux
1772 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Deported to the Pale of Settlement (Poland/Russia)
1775 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Warsaw
1789 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Alsace
1804 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Villages in Russia
1808 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Villages & Countrysides (Russia)
1815 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Lbeck & Bremen
1815 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Franconia, Swabia & Bavaria
1820 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bremen
1843 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Russian Border Austria & Prussia
1862 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Areas in the U.S. under General Grant's Jurisdiction
1866 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Galatz, Romania
1880s - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Russia
1891 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Moscow
1919 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bavaria (foreign born Jews)
1938-45 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Nazi Controlled Areas
1948 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Arab Countries
So it can be seen that a wide variety of peoples from a wide variety of locations around the globe, over very different historical periods, have found living alongside Jews to be totally intolerable and have been forced into drastic measures to deal with them.
Having established that the Jews are widely despised around the world to a very high degree, the next obvious question is WHY? How can any group of people be SO hated that no one can bear to live along side them? The answer to this question comes down to the contemptuous manner the Jews behave towards others - even those who were kind enough to grant them asylum during the height of the frequent purges they have brought upon themselves throughout history. The Jews exhibit an utterly despicable attitude to those not of their race and religion. They constantly preach about the virtues of equality and tolerance among peoples, but privately among their own they suffer no such nonsense to be heard.
The best way to gain some insight into how viscerally hateful they are of the rest of us 'Gentiles' - or non-Jews, is to study some sections from their Holy book, the Talmud. The Talmud is the primary source of Jewish law and dictates how Jews should behave among themselves, and between themselves and Gentiles in the wider world. There are quite stark differences as you will see. The Talmud itself is basically the recorded quasi-judicial opinions of various ancient rabbis on the events described in the first 5 books of the Old Testament - or 'the Torah' as the Jews call it. The quotes below were translated from the Babylonian Talmud; the Jews principal work of religious reference wence they originally thrived before breaking away into the wider world and forming their world-wide diaspora:
“Just the Jews are humans, the Non-Jews are not humans, but cattle.” (goyim – human cattle) – (Kerithuth 6b page 78, Jebhammoth 61a)
“The Non-Jews have been created to serve the Jews as slaves.” - (Midrasch Talpioth 225)
“The Non-Jews have to be avoided, even more than sick pigs.” - (Orach Chaiim 57, 6a)
“Sexual intercourse with Non-Jews is like sexual intercourse with animals” – (Kethuboth 3b)
“The birth-rate of the Non-Jews has to be suppressed massively” - (Zohar II, 4b)
“As you replace lost cows and donkeys, so you shall replace dead Non-Jews.” – (Iore Dea 337,1)
“To box an Israeli on the ear, is like to box on the ear of god.” – (Sanhedrin 58b)
"God (Jahveh) is never angry about the Jews, only with the Non-Jews” – (Talmud IV/8/4a) [this claim is untrue]
“The human (Jew) has to pray every day three times, because Jahveh didn’t make him a goyim, not a female and not an ignorant.” – (Talmud V/2/43b + 44a)
“Everywhere they (the Jews) come, they will be the princes of the Lords” – (Sanhedrin 104a)
“I (Jahveh) make you (the Jewry) the ancestor of the peoples, I make you the selected one amongst the peoples, I make you the king over the peoples, I make you the loved one amongst the peoples, I make you the best one amongst the peoples, I make you the trusted one amongst the peoples” – (Schabbat 105a)
“Towards a Non-Jew the Jew doesn’t cause an adultery… Punishable for the Jew, is just the adultery towards his next, that means the wife of a Jew. The wife of the Non-Jew is excluded” – (Talmud IV/4/52b)
There is no wife for the goyim, they really aren’t their wives” - (Talmud IV/4/81 + 82ab)
“You (the Jews) have made me, Jahveh, the only true lord in the world, so I will make you the only ruler in the world”
“Who wants to be smart shall occupy himself with money matters, because there are no corner pillars in the Tora that are more important, because they are like a sparkling fountain” – (Talmud IV/3/173b)
“Jews always have to try to deceive Non-Jews” – (Zohar I, 168a)
“Carry on trade with Non-Jews, if they have to pay money for it” - (Abhodah Zarah 2a T)
“Non-Jewish property belongs to the Jew who uses it first” - (Babba Bathra 54b)
“Every Jew is allowed to use lies and perjury to bring a Non-Jew to ruin” - (Babha Kama 113a)
“The possessions of the goyim are like an ownerless desert, and belong to the Jew who seizes them first.” - (Talmud IV/3/54b)
“The Jew is allowed to exploit the mistake of a Non-Jew and to deceive him” - (Talmud IV/1/113b)
“The Jew is allowed to practice usury on the Non-Jew” - (Talmud IV/2/70b)
“When the Messiah comes, all will be slaves of the Jews” - (Erubin 43b)
It is easy to see how this wicked and twisted belief system, practiced by the Jews against the people among whom they have found sanctuary, stokes immense resentment on the part of the host community, particularly if they have welcomed these homeless strangers into their lands in good faith when no one else would take them in. And since the Jews believe they are God's chosen people and have the right to treat everyone else as their slaves, the time is short before they assert their power and influence over the unsuspecting people of the host nation.
This is precisely what happened in Germany, as indeed it has happened everywhere else in former times, and has happened again today in the United States and Europe. The Jews typically arrive in haste from some other country, claiming to have been persecuted for their religion or manner of dress (anything but the REAL reason). They are practiced at fleeing from nation to nation and convincing and insistent liars. They find sanctuary with a new host. From that point on, there is no symbiosis in the relationship. The Jews take, take, take, take, take. The story is always the same. It's like the script from some old 1950s Sci-Fi movie.
Here's the typical secenario:
They turn up out of nowhere and grovel at the feet of any prospective host nation for sanctuary, claiming they are fleeing persecution. They inform the leaders of the prospective host nation that they mean no harm and can bring prosperity and good luck upon anyone who takes them in. They are admitted. They then rapidly set about pursuing their own selfish Agenda: they worm their way into positions of influence with the country's movers and shakers; they begin to take control of the nation's finances. They gain control of its currency, using their own physical gold holdings as a lever. They take over banking and credit operations, or when no such businesses exist, create them. They band together to unfairly force competitors out of business. They debase the coinage they now control. They finance wars against enemies, old and new, with money and power as motivation, in exchange for real political power both at 'home' and abroad. They crave more and more power, wealth and influence. Nothing is ever enough.
They take over the dissemination of information. In the modern world these are businesses in the TV, radio, newspaper, the movie and magazine industries. Worse yet, they use this control to debase the host society's cultural heritage and traditions with trashy, flashy, cheap and nasty pseudo-journalism, soft porn, celebrity-focused "news" and the complete avoidance of anything resembling reality. They spread lies, antipathy and confusion among the people. Things become increasingly difficult for the host nation's ordinary people. Their taxes are upped to pay for things that the Jews assure them they need, yet no benefits ever accrue to the ordinary people, most of whom are blind to the fact that they're being ruthlessly and outrageously used
Eventually, of course, they get found out, and it's always in the same way: they simply go way too far in pursuance of their Agenda and cannot tell when their shameless greed is becoming obvious for all to see. In spite of frequently asking themselves, "how much more can we get away with before the peasants wake up to what we're really doing" they are never able to accurately gauge the right moment. They ALWAYS go to far; it's kind of like in their genetic makeup. This is when the host community MUST act to save itself. It has now woken up to the true nature of the parasite it foolishly welcomed in. The question is: "What on earth are we going to do about the Jews?" This is a question that countless rulers have had to ask, in many different realms throughout many millenia
When it happened in Germany in the 1930, the result was the event now popularly referred to as the Holocaust. As stated above, Germany is one of the most cultured and civilized nations on earth and probably nothing short of the Jewish Problem could have had caused that mantel to slip. One of the chief characteristics of the German people and their police and military is that there are no shades of gray in their thinking. You are either right or you are wrong. And if you were wrong in Germany in the early 20th Century, whatever racial background you had, you were in trouble. And the Jews were in a great deal of trouble. Hitler wanted rid of them, like so many other leaders in the entire annals of recorded history. He decided he would try to banish them from the whole of Europe, and because their influence had been so corrosive to German society for so long, he proposed to make their exodus as unpleasant as possible; hence the transportation to the camps in cattle wagons, the very spartan camps themselves, and poor quality food served in insufficiently small quantities. The combination of poor diet, the bitterly cold weather, with very restricted heating and many outbreaks of Typhoid and only a handful of medical personnel per camp ensured that many camp inmates didn't survive. However, it has to be said in fairness to the Nazis, there was a vicious war on and supplies of everything, not just fuel and food, were severely restricted and the camp guards themselves were little more than skin and bone by early 1945.
So there you have it. Everything happens for a REASON. When there's a huge operation to expel hundreds of thousands of people from a country or a region, there's ALWAYS a reason for it. The Jews would have us believe otherwise, of course. The Holocaust was driven by pure racism, they claim; "hatred of us simply because we look and dress differently to everyone else." and "we get picked on and bullied simply because we look different." This of course is rubbish, but a surprisingly large number of folks believe it. They'd have no reason not to, of course, unless they'd acquainted themselves with the facts - as you have now done.
As a footnote I would just like to point out my personal belief that Holocaust II is out there approaching right now. All the Jewish apparatus for the control of power, influence and money that existed in the dying days of Germany's Weimar Republic of the early 1930s is mirrored in western governments right now in 2008 and in the United States and Great Britain in particular. These two countries are being systematically raped by the Jews, yet relatively few citizens of either have so far woken up to the fact that their governments have been stolen. But that number is growing exponentially thanks solely to the Internet. Maybe within the next 5 years, the political landscape will have changed beyond all recognition and there will be no Jews to be found in ANY positions of public influence in the West. That is the fervent wish of this blogger.
Friday, January 25, 2008
I can just imagine it now. Doctors surgeries filled to overflowing with black and Hispanic women and their legions of colored offspring. Black welfare mammies with six kids on a leash in one hand and a Double Whopper with Cheese in the other. All morbidly obese and dressed in the de-rigeur several-sizes-too-small black Spandex. All bitching about how you can't get Maple bacon with food stamps. A trip to the doctor's will become just another part of their daily routine: welfare office, surgery, supermarket, liquor store, score some dope, then off to Popeyes for a bucket of fried chicken.
America used to be a proud country where folks made their own way and didn't look for hand-outs. Now it's increasingly becoming a nation of whiners, pissers, moaners, panhandlers and other dependents whose only skill is in begging or robbing or else rolling a joint or improvising a crack-pipe. This nation is rotting under a mountain of garbage and somebody needs to do something about it NOW. Who will step forward and deliver us out of this madness before we are totally consumed by it? Can we rely on the government to take action? CAN WE HELL.
Monday, January 21, 2008
The Jews quite rightly take family life very seriously indeed. They know that the core element of their society, the very essence of what keeps the Tribe together, is the family and that everything else follows from the success or failure of this vitally-important fundamental unit.
There's no place for television in the orthodox Jewish home. The Jews know better than anyone about the despicable and ruinous cultural influences that are propagated 24/7 via this insidious universal medium. So if the Jewish home has a TV at all (probably just for show purposes) it will spend the vast majority of its time switched off, certainly when children are around.
Meals and festivals are likewise observed with religious reverence. Like most of us Gentile folks did in times past, they eat together as a family around a table with everyone present and nobody skipping off to eat alone upstairs in front of their computer or whatever. This closeness in family life is the substrate that forms the essential foundation for their children's futures and the Jews understand the huge importance of it. Much trouble and effort goes into maintaining this settled, cosseted way of life.
So what am I bitching about, then? Well here's where it gets kind of twisted... Whilst the Jews know that a close and stable family life is vital to their cultural and social integrity and do everything within their power to foster and encourage it for themselves, they contemporaneously make every effort to ensure that OUR families are put under intolerable strain to the point where breakdown becomes inevitable.
The Jews control the media (96% of it anyway according to Jew Watch) so THEY are responsible for the constant stream of poison spewed forth from television, cinema, magazines and newspapers. Their strident message is that we should be unsatisfied with our lives. We should, so we are told, be spending more than we are; working longer hours than we already do and having as much promiscuous sex as possible in any spare time we might undeservedly enjoy.
The Jewish media constantly cajoles us, even in the midst of our most Holy Christian festivals that we should be out in the malls, queuing up outside the shops for the start of the sales. People who refuse to buy into this consumerist bullshit are portrayed as oddballs; either shamefully stingy or embarrassingly poor, or worse yet, possibly suffering from some sort of personality disorder or sociopathic illness. The company of such unfortunates should be avoided and their poor children pitied. The peer pressure to spend in order to conform and buy popularity is immense.
So there's a huge dichotomy between the lifestyles of Jews and Gentiles which the former have purposely engineered to undermine the latter. The constantly-repeated mantra is that Gentile lives are woefully incomplete, and only through the unqualified acceptance of the globalist, consumerist values espoused by the Jewish media can we be saved. The problem of course, is that such pressures as these all too frequently destroy families. And when families are undermined, so is wider society. The evidence is now irrefutable.
So we can see that the Jews are playing the game by two different sets of rules: one for them and another for everyone else. Whilst being as keen as mustard to protect their OWN family environment; they are hell bent on destroying OURS, and as a consequence, our wider society. One could adopt an analogy at this point and remark that it's not unlike a black dope-dealer selling drugs to white parents' kids when he would never dream of peddling dope to his own. Or a burger vendor who sells food to others that he wouldn't feed to his own dog.
And you know what's even more twisted about the whole thing? The fact that nobody's allowed to complain about it! So if some black jerk is selling dope to school-kids outside the school gates and I get to hear about it, the law in some states says that I mustn't warn the kids' parents of what's going on as it might result in a 'hate crime' being perpetrated against the dealer by a mob of angry parents! Instead I have to inform the police and hope they can be bothered to do something about it.
But when it comes to the Jews poisoning our kids' minds through their all-pervasive media interests, our hands are tied. The police are powerless to do anything to redress the situation and the government itself is in the pocket of the Jews. I MUST protect my family and warn others about what's going on in our country, but by doing so, I may be instigating a 'hate crime' by stirring up ill-feeling against the Jews. No one wants to have to break the law, but what choice does one have when a very grave wrong indeed is being done to this country, yet there's no legal remedy? What's a principled person to do in such circumstances? I ask you again – WHAT???
Friday, January 18, 2008
I have a dream! I have a dream of an America where our founding fathers' values are fearlessly and sweepingly re-asserted and all opposing forces are smashed into oblivion! My vision is for an America free of all the deadwood and garbage that has been dragging it into the cultural and economic gutter for far too many decades now. I dream of an America where everything is in its proper place: Africans in Africa, Hispanics in Mexico and the Jews in Hades.
I have a dream of a place in which we can bring our kids up straight and true; to do right and to build a better future for themselves and their kids in turn. I want to see our kids grow up at their own speed and enjoy their childhoods in the sun. I want no longer to see them catapulted prematurely into some dysfunctional adulthood, raped all along the way by the Jewish media and the Liberal apparachicks from which they derive their staggering audacity and bigoted impudence.
I want to see a robust domestic economy which builds high walls for us against unfair international competition. America's trading partners need us far more than we need them. WE, uniquely in the world perhaps, can cheerfully go it alone - and be far better off for it. My vision is of a country that looks after itself and doesn't give a stuff for interfering in the affairs of others and in particular is perfectly comfortable with seeing Israel fight its own filthy wars alone under its own colors for once.
Isn't this what ALL good people want? Can it really be so hard to implement?
Monday, January 14, 2008
Yes, the usual suspects are at it again. The British Council's decision to reopen its Moscow offices in spite of Russia's outrage simply goes to demonstrate how far under the heel of Jewry Britain has been stomped. Phaedrus reported some months ago about the deterioration in relations and attributed it to the then new British exterior minister, David Milliband (a Jew who has been keen to show his pals in Israel that he's their man).
This latest episode is just the latest in a sequence of tit-for-tat bitching that began, not surprisingly, within a week of Milliband's appointment to the position. It's yet another example of the way in which a host country's interests are subordinated to those of its unwanted and most troublesome minority, the Jews. It is to be hoped that ordinary Russians will recognize the TRUE source of this antipathy, just as Putin and his government already does.
But this rancor is simply the way it is with the members of the Tribe of Abraham. Since the dawn of time, all they have ever done is set people at each other's throats; generating ill-feeling and bad blood between folks who could, without their constant interference, easily co-exist in peace. It is yet another good reason (if any more were needed) why the Jews must be removed from ALL positions of public influence around the world, for all time.
It's apparent a lot of black folks out there believe that Obama is going to be their savior and somehow magically make them all happy, rich and successful. Inspired by the charismatic Negro's rhetoric, and that of black-supremacist Oprah Winfrey, these poor fools honestly believe that Obama will bring in sweeping change that will deliver them out of their poverty and ignorance. What a bunch of idiots!
The fact of the matter is that Obama is already bought and paid for by the Jews, who own his ass 100%. Who is funding his campaign? Oh, it's "hedge funds" isn't it? So they say, but what does this mean exactly? Basically, it's euphamism for Wall Street merchant banks like Lehman Brothers, Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan. And we all know who owns THEM.
The US president has become rather like the Queen of England. A figurehead with no real power they can freely exercise. The candidates talk about all the changes they want to bring in to 'make America a better place' but those who are finally chosen to lead quickly discover (if they don't already know) that their policies will be decided for them by International Jewry and the NWO direction will be pursued with the same vigour as before. Nothing ever changes in today's 'democracy.'
(source: News From the West)
January 13, 2008
Foolishly, when the National Intelligence Estimate was released late last year many spectators in the bleachers watching (what appeared would be) an imminent war with Iran breathed a sigh of relief, and thinking the game was over began packing their things to go home.
In truth though they should have hung around a few minutes more and paid some mind to that old saying ‘It ain’t over till it’s over’. What they failed to consider is the fanaticism driving certain players in this game, not the least of whom are the Zionists controlling George Bush and George Bush himself. Bush and his handlers (both in the US and Israel and being the genuine Armageddonites they are) see themselves as the guys in the white hats fighting an epic battle against the forces of evil. This being the case, rational persons should understand that the release of the NIE would and will have little effect on them when it comes to doing the Lord’s work of wiping out Judea’s ancient enemies in Persia. And while some–viewing all this with a sense of unrealistic optimism–may still think Bush’s continuing rhetoric against Iran is all just an act, wiser heads should assume it is the real deal and come to grips with the likelihood that he indeed plans to make good on all the promises he gave his Zionist overlords prior to his election in 2000.
In the first case, people should consider that Bush has been a cauldron of sorts since the release of the NIE and seething with embarrassment and humiliation. His recalcitrance in this matter is easily proven by the fact he has not relented one iota in his previous position that Iran ‘was, is and will be’ a danger to the world. Rather than trusting the intelligence services whose multi-billion dollar budgets he himself approves he has cast aside the opinions of experts and professionals who are as wedded to their work as Mozart was to his music. In effect, it is similar to an obstinate man being told by a team of doctors that the patient in question does not have a deadly case of appendicitis but rather a simple case of indigestion and the man, listening to the mad voices in his head and the mad voices of his handlers, grabs the scalpel and begins slashing away in an effort to ‘cure’ the situation as he sees fit.
As for Bush’s handlers–both in Israel and the US–before the ink had even dried on the NIE they were shrieking and howling like spoiled children, just standard operating procedure whenever the Jewish state does not get the lollipop or new toy it demands, in this case an atomic war against Iran resulting in the deaths of millions. Politicians and military people alike in Israel have since scoffed at the NIE with a mixture of rage and ridicule, have characterized the NIE as either rubbish or else a deliberate maneuver to endanger Israel and have made it clear that if the US does not go forward with the annihilation of Iran that Israel will do it herself. Within what seemed like minutes of the NIE’s release it was announced that Bush was headed to Israel for his first presidential visit, and even though the stated reason for his visit was making peace between the thug Jewish state and the Palestinian Christians and Muslims (victims to the longest military occupation in modern history) it is more likely that the real reason is to get his marching orders from his bosses in Tel Aviv regarding war with Iran and to coordinate how it will be brought about.
And then, almost as if by magic before he had even landed, several incidents had taken place, the first being the launching of 2 Katyusha rockets–said to have come from Hezbollah-controlled southern Lebanon into northern Israel. The rockets are of course ‘Iranian’ in origin, just like all the supposed IEDs (Improvised Explosive Devices) killing American troops in Iraq. Following close on the heals of this was the ‘clash’ between elements of the Iranian navy and 3 US warships passing through the straits of Hormuz. The manner in which the event was splashed across American news channels depicted 5 Iranian fast boats–not much larger than an ordinary fishing boat and incapable of carrying anything more than a few personnel–charging the American ships (that could have cut them to shreds literally within seconds) in a ‘threatening and provocative’ manner. A video tape released by the Navy figured an Iranian radio transmission to the US ships saying ‘We are coming to you, and within a few minutes you will explode.’
Predictably, the 2-headed government/media hydra–infested to the gills with Zionist operatives made the most of it in again striking up the cacophony of the war symphony. Bush, like an attack dog on a short leash snarled and growled on command and used the event to reiterate his position that Iran was a threat to world peace and threatened retaliation if it were repeated.
What is particularly interesting about this latest ‘incident’ is how it resembles an event that took place during the Reagan era. In his 2nd book ‘The Other Side Of Deception’ ex-Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky detailed how Israel–desperately wanting US military action initiated against Libya–employed what was called ‘Operation Trojan Horse’. At the time, Libya’s Muhammar Kaddafi was ‘the new Hitler’ (just as Iran’s Ahmadinejhad is today) and in the interests of showing who’s boss in the big bad Middle East, Israel’s intelligence service tricked the Americans into thinking that not only was Libya responsible for past acts of terror but planning new ones as well. Like all Mossad ‘By way of deception, thou shalt do war’ operations, an Israeli team was sent into Libya with a radio transmitter where fake messages in Arabic containing the aforementioned incriminating material were broadcast to an eavesdropping United States. The gullible Americans, monitoring the chatter and prodded by Mossad, fell for the ploy, resulting in a US strike being launched against Libya with 160 aircraft.
Surprisingly (or perhaps not) within a day of the Iranian ‘incident’ and following Iran’s denial of the course of events (along with video and audio of its own contradicting the American claims) the US navy was backtracking and was forced to admit that it did not know who really broadcast the messages. The frequency used to make the threats was an international frequency, easily accessible by literally anyone and thus could have originated from any boat in the area, or even from some ‘unknown location’ on shore.
Before leaving the Jewish state to visit with the leaders of Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Kuwait (seeking support for military action against Iran) America’s fearless leader visited Yad Vashem Holocaust Memorial, Israel’s ‘holy of holies’ and a ‘must-see’ for all visiting dignitaries. Donning his mandated Jewish skull cap and ignoring the holocaust of the Palestinian Christians and Muslims taking place a mere few yards away, he wept for Hitler‘s Jewish past victims and said that ‘When evil exists we must resist it’ and then later when talking about the death camps said clearly ‘We should have bombed Auschwitz’.
It should be remembered that since Israel set Iran in her sights, it has been a daily, if not hourly mantra–‘It is 1938…Iran is the new Germany and Ahmadinejhad is the new Hitler…’
Of course, many would say that Bush’s remarks were merely him adhering to that old dictum ‘When in Rome, do as the Romans do’, since Israel’s existence is as intrinsically tied to the constant, somber remembrance of Jewish persecution as beer-drinking and festivities are at Oktoberfest…
However, a few things–as troubling as they are–need to be kept in mind as well before closing the book a few pages short of the end. There are still US two carrier groups sitting not far from where the recent ‘incident’ with Iran took place. A few months before the release of the NIE, news stories began circulating of Iran having developed a ‘deadly’ new submarine capable of evading US sonar. Shortly thereafter, well-known journalist Seymour Hersh wrote of inside information he received detailing how a bull’s-eye had been spray-painted on a US ship stationed in Qatar immediately across from the Iranian coast and how ‘the Iranians’ had done it. There is at least one Israeli submarine in the Persian Gulf, and given the treasonous theft and transfer to Israel of high-tech information by one Jonathon Pollard, who can say what kind of advantages Israel has gained in terms of sonar and stealth capabilities over US surface ships? America has fought many wars as a direct or indirect result of ‘naval incidents’, including the Civil War, the Spanish American War, WWI, WWII, and the Gulf of Tonkin incident that led to Johnson’s ‘troop surge’ in Vietnam.
And last but not least, there is Israel’s murderous attack on the USS Liberty, meant to be the catalyst in bringing about Armageddon for the sake of the poor, beleaguered Jewish state to consider, as well as that other old dictum concerning ‘a leopard changing its spots’.
And when all this is taken together, it is only those in the bleachers who do not truly understand the nature of the game being played who heave a sigh of relief before the final buzzer rings and start heading home, along with their false sense of security.
2007 Mark Glenn, Correspondent for American Free Press Newspaper
Saturday, January 12, 2008
Comments in what follows below within square brackets are by Phaedrus..
"Pakistani men jailed for racially-motivated attack"
Source: the Romford Recorder's website....
"Three Asian men from a gang of over 30 have been convicted of attacking a group of [English] friends at a birthday celebration and trying to kill one of them have each been given 18-year jail sentences.
"Sodrul Isalm, 23, Delwar Hussain, 21, Mamoon Hussain, 20 [all Pakistani Islamic extremists to whom Britain's Jews willingly granted entry] were sentenced at the Old Bailey.
"John Payne, 33, was left paralyzed below the waist by the attack on an East London housing estate almost two years ago. He faces the rest of his life in a wheelchair. His struggle to get the case treated as the hate crime [that it is] he claimed it was has eaten up all his family's resources. [probably because illegal immigrants have drained all available public funds]
"The court was told that the gang of more than 30 Pakistanis [encouraged to enter Britain in the early 1960s by Internationalist Jewry then-as-now controlling the BBC's pro-immigration propaganda] attacked the group of five [white English] people, screaming racial abuse at them as they repeatedly kicked them whilst they were on the ground, thereby occasioning Mr. Payne's injuries." (item ends)
As can be seen from incidents like the above, the Jews are the single biggest cause of ethnic tensions in our world today. They use their political influence in the West to force disparate races to live together right up one against another. They know damn well that this system doesn't work in practice and it only ever generates hatred and enmity. This is why the Jew extols it. Jews love to create chaos and disharmony. Read the Old Testament and see for yourself. They haven't changed a bit since Biblical times.
Furthermore, look at Israel's 'Apartheid Wall' that is under construction in Arab Palestine right now. The Jews know that high fences make good neighbors and the mixing of cultures just doesn't work. They try to preserve this knowledge entirely for themselves, however. Any non-Jew who has the temerity to adopt such a program of racial segregation is immediately demonized in the 96% controlled Jewish media as a Nazi or a eugenicist. However, the most ardent, hard-core Nazis and eugenicists are the Jews themselves. Who do they think they are fooling by constantly playing the victim?
Friday, January 11, 2008
From the outset, allow me to assure any Christians of the Fundamentalist persuasion who may be reading this, that nothing in what follows attempts in any way to undermine the Creation and that the theory hereby put forward is based upon mainstream science and is not disputed or denounced by religious leaders of ANY faith. This is a necessarily quite demanding essay to both write and to read. However, it is essential for the true scholar of the Jewish Problem to acquaint him/herself with. This is no hair-brained theory; it is solidly grounded in hard scientific study of the kind the Jews, for a number of reasons, are most nervous about, for it strays into the terrifying truths revealed by evolutionary biology...
Both Jews and Gentiles, are, in essence, biological entities that are in general terms merely somewhat more sophisticated animals than any other on the face of the planet. Of course, the Jews don't see it the same way as they believe they are superior beings to the rest of us. So this essay attempts to explain why the Jews have followed a separate evolutionary path with respect to everyone else and have as a result acquired their predominant, heritable racial characteristic: the insatiable craving for eye-wateringly vast wealth; for baubles, bangles and beads and everything that glitters.
It is a recurrent puzzle to the rest of us and the question is repeatedly aired on internet discussion groups: why do the Jews seek to enrich themselves beyond the boundaries of reason? Rational people constantly pose the question as to why the Jews feel the need to acquire, at such terrible cost to the planet and its various peoples, such absurdly vast fortunes? Why do they do this, well into old age and beyond, when as we all know, they cannot take their ill-got riches with them to the grave?
At first sight, this core characteristic of the Jewish people seems an impenetrable and insoluble conundrum. Many of us can name a Jew - not necessarily through personal acquaintance - who has spent his entire life building an immense fortune, yet has purchased with it not a single pennyworth of life. Examples of such individuals are innumerable throughout the ages and many will no doubt spring to every reader's mind. The question we attempt to answer here, however, is WHY? What IS the point of this boundless acquisitiveness and how did it come about?
As noted above, we are simply higher animals, and every bit as subject to the forces of evolution as any other animal beneath us. To understand the Jewish mindset, it is helpful to study a few species with which we share this planet, for we can see mirrored in their development, the same characteristics arising as have developed in the Children of Israel. The phenomenon under examination is what evolutionary biologists refer to as "runaway" (after the term coined by R. A. Fisher circa 1930) and it is surprisingly common in nature - and for many individual members of a species on such a track, it can prove ultimately FATAL. For the purposes of this recondite essay, Phaedrus proposes to briefly summarize the characteristics of a small selection of animals which all exhibit remarkably similar traits to that of the Jew. First up: the bower bird.
The bower bird builds elaborately large nests which are simply HUGE in proportion to the size and needs of the bird and its mate. The bird itself is nothing more in size than the common crow, yet its nest is sufficiently capacious for two adult humans to sit together in comfort! Moreover, the nest of the bower bird is exquisitely decorated with colorful berries which serve no other purpose than to act as ornamentation to impress any prospective mate. Furthermore, as these ornamental berries dry out and dull, the male bower bird makes periodic sorties into the forest to replace and rearrange them with fresher, brighter and shinier berries- all in an effort to keep up appearances. The female of the species selects her male partners on the basis of how large and well-decorated his nest is.
Next, consider pea-fowl. The male of the species (the peacock) is so overly encumbered with a vast spray of brightly colored, iridescent feathers that one might conclude it is unwisely advertising its presence to predators, thereby inviting its own destruction. However, the peahen considers such a display a highly desirable trait. Instinctively she knows that any male capable of surviving the burden of such a fantastic display at the risk of being run-down and eaten, must possess excellent genes which give rise to strong and healthy offspring. So she mates with the male with the best display. This is where Darwin's lesser-known theory of Sexual Selection strays into the 'handicap principle' zone. This is outside the scope of this essay but the interested reader may find his curiosity satisfied by a trawl through the appropriate Web resources.
Then there are a large number of species of long-tailed finches, which grow tail feathers so long and heavy that they can ultimately make it impossible for the male to leave the ground at all. In the case of the males with the longest, heaviest tales, predation is assured! And yet the female of the species will generally prefer the male with the life-threateningly long tail. Once again, however, contrary to common sense, the female knows best. She mates with the male with the longest and most cumbersome tale, because it is a powerful indicator of his strength and ability to avoid predation despite his heavily ornamental carriage of feathers. Scientists have proved this beyond question by attaching fake long feathers to the tails of some males and noting that the females choose the made-up males above the naturally well-endowed ones.
Two other species that share the same characteristic heavy ornamentation are the red-bellied stickleback and the rhinoceros beetle whose behaviors will not be expanded upon here for the sake of brevity, but the principle is exactly the same as the previous, avian cases examined above. And the foregoing examples are very far from comprising an exhaustive list.
All these species exhibit the 'runaway' behavior described by Fisher. They are so over elaborately ornamented/impeded that there is a very close trade-off between the securing of a mate on the one hand, and being able to escape a predator as a consequence of all the excessive ornamental baggage being carried on the other.
In most cases, the female of these species selects her mate in accordance with the 'handicap principle' which extends into human selection in the case of the Jews (whereupon it becomes highly dangerous to life on this planet.)
The handicap principle asserts that females prefer as mates those males which are able to exhibit outrageous wanton excess in their phenotypical forms; the characteristic of excessive 'redundancy' which most of the females (most notably the Jewish) find irresistibly compelling. It's an unfortunate selection preference in humans especially, because it is ruinous to our planet. It extends WAY beyond the harmless organic, decorative efforts of the bower bird and it is ugly in contrast to the beauty of the peacock's fan or the amazing iridescent coloration of the scarab beetle's shell.
It is clear from the foregoing that the Jew and Jewess are nothing more than another example of the handicap principle in operation, albeit in the quasi-human domain. The Jew is as much a prisoner of his ancestry and his heritable traits as are the rest of us. The key difference, however, is that Jewish heritable traits are ruinous to the planet and society to an infinitely greater extent than our own are. The majority of we Gentiles do NOT put material wealth above everything else in our lives. The Jew, however, generally does. And even in those Jews who do not exhibit this behavioral trait during their lifetimes, the genes that carry it are still there, latent, yet merely in recession, ready to be awakened in the next or subsequent generations.
In the foregoing we can see that environmentally-ruinous Jewish behavioral traits are not merely a result of solely Talmudic teachings, but in something organic within their very beings. Phaedrus is no longer young; The light is growing dim, yet wisdom has never fled me. It has, to the contrary, only grown. It will be the task of the younger generation of people in the West and Russia to find a way to ensure that the Jew and its ruinous, debilitating genetic traits are never again permitted to de-rail the evolution of a decent, peaceful and prosperous society with just and moral values. That is the REAL challenge of the 21st Century.
Sounds like a great idea, doesn't it? Well, perhaps not SUCH a great idea to the well-informed constituency of Phaedrus' core readership. But nevertheless, there are a number of Western financial corporations that have recently taken to extolling us to place our hard earned cash in the dark continent where we can - so they claim - enjoy spectacular returns! Gee whiz, we finally get something BACK from Africa? Sound to good to be true? Well they wouldn't lie to us, would they?
Sadly they are indeed peddling junk. How these people can keep a straight face while they're promoting African 'investments' is quite remarkable. They DO admit, as much however, when they describe Africa as the LAST great emerging market opportunity. In other words, every OTHER place on planet earth has had investment up to its ass; they're maxed-out investment wise and Africa's the very LAST place left that nobody except the Chinese have pumped a single buck into for obvious reasons (Kenya, Liberia, Sierra Leone, DR Congo and Zimbabwe to name just five).
Sure, China has invested Big Bucks in Africa, but they've done so very smartly. They have not backed African businesses. They are not venture capitalists in this basket-case continent. They have taken cynical positions which just grab a share of Africa's mineral wealth. They're not betting on smart Africans' entrepreneurship, for as we all know, there ain't none! Nope, the Chinese just want to grab the minerals, precious metals and oil. Any useless piece of shit can dig a hole in the ground. It's not beyond the average African to wield a shovel. Not on a good day, anyway.
In any event, having carefully analyzed African investment opportunities as outlined above, Phaedrus himself has a bit of investment advice which folks with a few thousand dollars to spare might find valuable. Rather than invest in Africa, just bundle up your wad of cash and flush it down the toilet. The returns are precisely the same, and you have the added satisfaction of knowing that your hard-earned cash hasn't swollen some fat, corrupt African dictator's Swiss bank account. Plus you don't pay no middleman, and you save a pile on paperwork! As an infamous Nigerian government minister once smilingly said: "That'll be $46m please."
Another great article by Curtis Maynard, sourced from News From the West...
USA Today is reporting that the Senate’s immigration deal pleases few. No kidding? What, I need a mainstream publication to tell me that? I don’t think so. I can tell the reader without any hesitation whatsoever that the Senate’s immigration deal pleases almost nobody with the exception of the 20 million illegal aliens here in the United States at present and a few million Jews and ultra-liberal leftists on the east coast.
Don’t be fooled by the US governments attempts to convince you through the Zionist media that Democrats want this or want that, or Republican moderates favor the deal, or that liberals see it this way, or conservatives see it that way, the government is lying and they’re using the media to shovel this crap down your throat.
Illegal immigration and whether or not to send the 20 million illegals in this country packing is one of very few bipartisan issues that nearly everyone, Black, White Hispanic, or Asian can agree on today. NO AMNESTY! No amnesty OR anything that smells like amnesty, these people must leave, one way or another and if our Congressional representatives can’t or won’t make that happen, we have a duty, an obligation, to our children, grandchildren, and those of our neighbors to make them!
When do we take our guns off the rack, oil them up, and head to Washington DC? That’s really the question isn’t it? We do have a right to do so you know, in fact, that is the very purpose of the Second Amendment, something our government has been actively trying to take away from us or at least reinterpret so as to disarm the American people.
The definition of treason is relatively clear, especially as it applies to anyone that has taken an oath swearing allegiance to the United States Constitution, which clearly states that the oath taker swears to uphold the Constitution against enemies foreign AND domestic. One definition is vague enough to include dissidents like myself IF one reads it as is, rather than considers what it really states and that is that treason is “a crime that undermines the offender's government.” I certainly am not in favor of our present government and won’t support it or anything it seeks to do until it [this is important] recognizes the authority of the American people, the true owners of this government. Theoretically, our politicians are suppose to represent us the American people, when they stop representing what we the people want they need to either leave office voluntarily or be thrown out.
The legal definition of treason as defined by Merriam Webster is simply a “betrayal of trust.” Now if the current representatives of this government aren’t guilty of treason as defined by Merriam Webster I don’t know what to say, they [Democrats and Republicans] have done nothing but lie, deceive, subvert, coerce, threaten, and betray our trust since 9-11. They have already engaged in treason and many of them know it, that is why you see so many of them completely selling out at present, selling their corrupt souls and votes to the hidden elite – the true rulers of the United States of America, who by the way do not represent the American people.
Am I saying that George Bush is a traitor? Damn right I am. I’m also accusing the following Senators of High Treason, each one of them voted to give amnesty to the 20 million illegal invaders presently squatting on American soil and not one of them can or ever will attempt to prove that the majority of their constituents [The people that elected these people to represent THEM] approve of any form of amnesty or forgiveness of the illegal aliens in their midst, not one. Thus, it’s really simple no? These Senators are NOT representing those that voted for them – they are however, representing something or someone else.
Murkowski (R-AK), Stevens (R-AK), Kyl (R-AZ), Lincoln (D-AR), Pryor (D-AR), Boxer (D-CA), Feinstein (D-CA), Salazar (D-CO), Lieberman (D-CT), Carper (D-DE), Martinez (R-FL), Chambliss (R-GA), Isakson (R-GA), Inouye (D-HI), Craig (R-ID), Durbin (D-IL), Bayh (D-IN), Lugar (R-IN), Grassley (R-IA), Harkin (D-IA), Brownback (R-KS), McConnell (R-KY), Landrieu (D-LA), Collins (R-ME), Snowe (R-ME), Cardin (D-MD), Mikulski (D-MD), Kennedy (D-MA), Levin (D-MI), Stabenow (D-MI), Coleman (R-MN), Klobuchar (D-MN), Cochran (R-MS), Lott (R-MS), Bond (R-MO), McCaskill (D-MO), Hagel (R-NE), Nelson (D-NE), Ensign (R-NV), Reid (D-NV), Gregg (R-NH), Sununu (R-NH), Lautenberg (D-NJ), Menendez (D-NJ), Bingaman (D-NM), Domenici (R-NM), Schumer (D-NY), Burr (R-NC), Conrad (D-ND), Brown (D-OH), Voinovich (R-OH), Smith (R-OR), Wyden (D-OR), Casey (D-PA), Specter (R-PA), Reed (D-RI), Whitehouse (D-RI), Graham (R-SC), Alexander (R-TN), Bennett (R-UT), Hatch (R-UT), Leahy (D-VT), Warner (R-VA), Webb (D-VA), Cantwell (D-WA), Murray (D-WA), Rockefeller (D-WV), Feingold (D-WI), Kohl (D-WI),
I’m often accused of anti-Semitism because of my willingness to say and write the word “Jew,” so why change things now. Let me be the first to tell you then that every single Jewish Senator without exception voted to provide amnesty to illegal aliens on Monday, May 21, 2007, just as their co-ethnics in the ADL, SPLC, ACLU, AJC, and every other organized Jewish group in the United States expected them to.
I am not guilty of subversion, but many, if not most of our politicians today are. I am not guilty of lying to the American people and telling them that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, ties to Al Qaeda, and was responsible for 9-11, yet many of our politicians continue to embrace Bush’s foreign policies in the Mid East, despite the fact that they know they were developed as a result of the above lies. I am not guilty of spitting in the face of the American people and betraying their trust, but all of the above Senators are. I am not guilty of serving the interests of a foreign government [Israel] as are so many in Congress today, but yet, I guarantee you, the Jewish media will soon be doing all it can to convince Americans that people like me [Patriotic Constitutionalists] are terrorists and enemies of the state – don’t be fooled – they’re lying – that’s what they do best].
Lastly, don’t fall for the phony vernacular and bald faced lies of our politicians; they want to play with the meaning of words. They’ll insist that they aren’t giving amnesty to illegal aliens because of this or that. They’ll also insist that their constituencies “want” them to “solve” the illegal alien issue. It’s all lies – yes, their constituents want them to solve the problem and they want them to do this by voting against any form of amnesty, any bill that allows illegal immigrants to stay in this country, but these liars will do their best to skew what their constituents want and to move forward with their treasonous objectives.
The government does NOT represent us any longer, it serves other interests and as long as it continues to do so, it is guilty of treason and we the people can lawfully oppose them in any manner we wish, we’re protected by the Constitution, they aren’t.
So we can see that this problem is a pan-Western one. Almost without exception, all Western governments are lying to us and have been for decades. They say one thing to get elected, and do the complete opposite once in office. And they get away with it over and over and over again. Democracy is broken. We need a new way forward. Keep those articles coming, Curt!
Tuesday, January 8, 2008
The British people (more than any other Europeans) are constantly scolded into accepting that the ethnic constituency of their parliament and courts must reflect the ethnic make up of the country at large. This is the excuse given for fielding exclusively shortlisted black/homo/Muslim candidates which give the voter no real choice as to whom to vote for.
However, if this pretext for 'fairness' were a genuine REASON as opposed to the NWO scam that it is, it would entail the ousting of hundreds of Jewish MPs, peers and Judges, since they are significantly OVER represented in public life in Britain, when compared to the modest 3% or so they comprise in the wider country at large. So ... the obvious question is... when are all the Jews in Parliament and the courts going to step down to make way for those minorities whose interests they claim to be so keen to promote?
Phaedrus for one will not be holding his breath.
Once again they're sowing the seeds of their own destruction. I don't even need to state to whom I refer, do I? You all know. And so do THEY. And not only that, but deep down inside, even THEY know I'm right. THEY know their shortcomings. Yet THEY simply can't stop. THEY just can't. It's hard-wired into their genes to press on, on, on. Rather like lemmings. THEY know they're heading for their ultimate demise, but THEY just can't stop themselves. This is the way THEY are constructed. THEY simply can't help it. and in the Internet Age, this will prove to be their FINAL undoing.
Yeah, I'm sure we all want this whining, pissing, moaning bitch to be our next President and Chief of the armed forces?
What's she gonna do when a REAL enemy strikes (not these imaginary ones that the Jews/Bush/Cheney invent for us?)
Hillary: are you gonna:-
Bitch about being less popular than a Negro?
Whine about being a woman out of your depth in a man's world?
Moan about your poor little feelings getting hurt?
Burst into floods of tears and surrender?
I'm sure we'd all like to know BEFORE we vote!
Saturday, January 5, 2008
- - -
Dear Mr. Silverstein,
You will doubtless be aware that the internet is overrun with all sorts of lurid conspiracy theories surrounding the events which took place in New York City on the 11th of September 2001. These disturbing rumors are undermining the people's faith in their elected government and calling into question who REALLY runs America today and in precisely WHOSE interest. As the owner of the leases on the World Trade Center site, YOU PERSONALLY are in a unique position to allay people's fears and put an end to the endless conspiracy theories which have only grown stronger and more persistent over the last 6 years.
There are just a few basic questions that you need to address as a matter of great urgency. In doing so you can quash untold numbers of fanciful stories and reassure the public that there was no illicit government involvement in the slaughter of 2,974 innocent Americans on that fateful morning, and that the horrors that took place that day were solely due to Arab terrorists - unassisted by any third party acting on behalf of Israel and/or certain US government agencies.
You are recorded on video as well as radio as having made the following statement (in respect of Tower 7) which I quote here verbatim:
LS: "I remember getting a call from the Fire Department commander to tell me they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire. They said, you know, 'we've had such terrible loss of life that the smartest thing to do is to pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."
Now this statement is unsatisfactory for a number of reasons, not least of which is the fact that I have employed an expert in body language at my own expense who has repeatedly watched the video tape of your above statement and declared your words, with a 98% degree of certainty, to be lies.
Mr. Silverstein, you need to answer just a handful of questions to set the matter to rest. It will only take a few moments of your valuable time and could be a great comfort to the more than 17,000 families which were in various ways, devastated by those 'terrorist attacks.'
1. Who was the Fire Department commander you referred to on that day who recommended that building number 7 be brought down?
2. Why did he only refer to ONE fire when as we all know there were in fact multiple fires, independently documented on film, burning throughout the building?
3. Why do you suppose he recommended a controlled demolition of the building in view of the fact that no other skyscraper in history had ever before collapsed due to fire? What led him to believe this one was a uniquely dangerous exception?
4. Given that the controlled demotion of such a large building typically takes a highly skilled team working 24 hours a day for at least a week to complete, how do you account for the fact that the building was successfully brought down (or "pulled" as you put it) within considerably less than 8 hours?
5. How do you account for the fact that the operation to "pull" the building was carried out in RECORD time on a day when the city of New York was in total and utter chaos and the likelihood of getting ANYONE other than the emergency services to do ANYTHING beyond simply rescuing the trapped and injured was virtually nil???
6. Which (unbelievably efficient) firm was contracted at zero notice and under impossible conditions to undertake the remarkably successful controlled demolition of this massive building in less than a third of just one day? The city of New York may need this valuable recommendation in the event of future attacks.
If you could see your way clear to answering the above points, then I'm sure a lot of folks' minds would be put at ease, and equally importantly, respect and trust in our government could be restored. I look forward to hearing your answers as soon as possible. You know you WILL be compelled to answer before a Grand Jury one day if you don't answer now, so it's best to get it out of the way in advance, don't you think?
Yours in breathless anticipation,
In Phaedrus’ opinion, the ultra-orthodox Jew with all the trappings of his faith shouldn’t be victimized for his beliefs, because he makes no secret of them by the open display of certain clothes which render him unmistakably a Jew to whom such beliefs can reasonably be attributed. Phaedrus has a certain respect for those who are open about what they believe in and make no secret of it. It doesn’t mean we have to like such people. They might be Jews, they might be policemen, they might be skinheads; it doesn’t matter. We know where they’re coming from simply by their appearance.
According to our individual political and/or religious preferences, we can modify our behavior accordingly. For example. If Phaedrus sees an Hisadic Jew on the street, he doesn’t indulge in heckling or spitting, at the person as some folks might. Phaedrus fixes the Jew with piercing eye-contact and a slow nod of the head that conveys the unmistakable message, “I know exactly what your game is.” That’s all. Nothing threatening, nor is it intended to be. But the message will have got through, nevertheless, without a single word being spoken. Needless to say if such a Jew coming down the road tried to engage one conversation, it is obvious that it would only be some proposition of benefit to the Jew alone and to the other party’s detriment. So it’s best to simply walk on in silence. If a class of persons can be readily identified on sight, then we can take simple steps to avoid them so no one is put at risk.
Contrast this situation with the first example above. A soldier in wartime who is either out of his uniform in a foreign country, or perhaps worse, wearing the uniform of the other side. Now we have a problem. There is deceit. The rules have been broken. Same applies with some ordinary citizen donning a police uniform. He’s purporting to be something that he isn’t. In both of these instances, unfair advantage can be gained by deception.
This is why we must always, all of us who constitute ‘gentiles’ (non-Jews) at any rate, be ever vigilant for Jews who APPEAR to be just like the rest of us. No religious garb overtly worn to give any indication as to that person’s character, ethnicity, or likely behavior. Jews whose names are not typically Jewish. Jews who have ditched their original family names and adopted common names from the country in which they now live. They don’t follow the Mosaic law like their brethren the Hisadic/Ultra-orthodox Jew does with their characteristic, giveaway hairstyles and beards. They look just like you and me. This kind of Jew Phaedrus refers to as an “Occult Jew” from the Latin word whose root means ‘hidden’ or concealed. Of course, if this person runs a tailoring business or a café or a car dealership, then he’s no ostensible threat to my country or my way of life. So that’s fine. But if he’s running a major corporation, or a bank, a TV station, a newspaper, an advertising agency, or has a job in the government or is trying to form a new political party or whatever; THEN, I’m afraid, we have a problem. This Jew is analogous to the soldier out of uniform. We know his innate beliefs entitle him to treat the rest of us worse than battery chickens for his personal gain. And if he’s in a position of power, then no matter what he may say to the contrary, he’s out to screw us. His Holy book gives him carte blanch to milk us for all we’re worth.
THIS Jew, reader, is the source of 90% of the world’s problems. He’s constantly claiming to be working in our interests and fighting for value, truth, justice – whatever - but in reality he is doing the exact opposite. He is enriching himself at others’ expense.
Prove it to yourself. The next time you see some big business has collapsed as a result of fraud, do a little bit of digging on the internet. Investigate the pasts of the CEO, the Managing Director or the Finance Director. You may be surprised to find that in the VAST MAJORITY of instances, at least one of these key figures will be Jewish. But you’ll hardly ever, in any TV, radio, or newspaper report, be informed of this vital detail. It’s something you have to discover for yourself. And on this point, I wonder why the authorities seem so keen to keep former press baron "Lord Black" out of jail? Will he ever see the inside of the Slammer?