.
I'm not even sure if Curt will get to see this anytime soon, given the problems he reported with his computer, but it needs to be said, anyway.
Bloggers (of whom Curt remains one of THE most prominent) give up a great deal of time and put in enormous effort in trying to inform ordinary people of what is going so wrong in the world today and who precisely is responsible for it all. At times it may seem as though the task is hopeless, but I believe it is far from it, at least all the while people have free access to the internet, then the message can only spread - as indeed it already has and continues to. But even if the entire network were to be shut down tomorrow, bloggers like Curt have ALREADY done their job, for they have set the fuse ablaze...
If Curt never writes another item for the rest of his life, I believe his work is already done. It's out there now in so many forms; re-published, re-distributed, discussed in bars and on buses and trains, at BBQs and house-parties, saved and stored and encrypted on hard drives and memory sticks for future printing and dissemination whenever the appropriate moment arises. So at this point in time, the fuse IS fiercely burning. Whether it continues to thrive and grow - or smolder and die out - depends on the broader mass of the people we are striving to reach. If they continue to sit in front of the Jewbox with the remote control in one hand and a Big Mac in the other; watching such perverse spectacles as American Idol and Larry King, then we as a race ARE doomed - and deserve to be, in all honesty.
But my view of the future is different. I see an ever-increasing awareness on the part of the American couch-potato and once this reaches a certain critical mass, there will be NO stopping it. We have to continue to work towards reaching that critical point by getting this information out by any conceivable means we can. Only then can we be certain that our work has passed that vital tipping point which MUST be reached to ensure what follows will take on an inexorable spirit of its own, sweeping aside the ugliness and dross of this insidious NWO non-culture of depravity; of decadent, self-destructive Liberalism that's been thrust upon us, against the wishes of the majority, for so many decades now. I believe we shall see this happy outcome not just in our lifetimes, but in the VERY near future, as all the lies and deceit of the past 60 years unravel before the eyes of the world and more and more people finally wake up to it - and take some long-overdue action!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
31 comments:
You've probably seen it but Curt's blog is "under review due to possible Blogger Terms of Service violations".
Again.
Curt Maynard: Victim Of "Peter Principle," "Burn-Out"
(Apollonian, 30 Aug 08)
Phaedrus: I suspect u can well rest easy for comrade Curt Maynard who has reached his "Peter Principle" level of incompetence. For in general the problem is WHAT SPECIFICALLY we white folk should DO--not in hysterically ALARMING people to effect there is a problem. Alarm has already well been given.
Ron Paul (CampaignForLiberty.com), for example, has made it fairly clear to enough people we're victims now of "Empire of Lies," though Paul doesn't emphasize the Jew--but which Jew problem ought to be apparent to any true Christians. The master-crux fraud mechanism then is that COUNTERFEIT scam known as US Federal Reserve Bank (Fed)--see RealityZone.com for expo/ref.
Thus USA is captive to literal criminal conspiracy of counterfeiters--it's really quite simple in its way.
Jews achieved their conquest by means of lies, esp. "good-evil" delusion and Pelagian heresy. The COUNTERFEITING mechanism then allowed Jews to buy and subsidize an entire sector of "Judeo-Christian" (JC--see Whtt.org and TruthTellers.org for expo/ref.) heretics and dupes who are programmed to be Jew-friendly and who imagine "Jesus was a Jew (hence Talmudist, which Talmud was denounced by Christ, as in Gosp. MARK 7:1-13)."
For best Talmudic expo, ck RevisionistHistory.org, TruthTellers.org, and Come-and-hear.com.
Imperative now, esp. for white volk, is to rally forces of truth, and to do this for mass of people requires serious AESTHETIC-type application, hence theology, hence Christianity. Curt Maynard has difficulty with this serious aestheticalist problematic, as it requires logic and thought with which he has difficulty.
For what's nature of the socio-biologic (see KevinMacDonald.net) problem in the first place? Basically white people have, in the historical cycle of things (according to "Decline of the West," by Oswald Spengler) become too over-populated, and made fatal, but obligatory, decision to commit suicide by bringing in Jews who are now about the task of "culling the herd," so to speak--as they did so horrifically in Russia, for example, starting around a hundred yrs ago.
Curt Maynard's high-point was his being selected and used by Mike Rivero of WhatReallyHappened.com to advertise idea there are "good" Jews (like there are good psychopaths), and that now these "good" Jews actually have similar interests with normal human beings--like white folks.
Curt Maynard tried lots of stuff to increase his "popularity" and "audience"--but he forgot he needed some substance and should do more than to suck-up to Jews--he got a little carried-away for that.
I remember when I tried to school him (Maynard) on the "good-evil" delusion which Jews have used so successfully. Maynard replied he thought Jews' effect on white folk was so pernicious and disastrous they should be called "evil"--rather circular for logic, but hey, that's how he thinks, I discovered--Maynard rather like a woman, in all truth.
So Maynard took it all as far as he could, blogging, for his effeminacy--after all, he's married with daughters, I understand. Such effiminacy evidently rubbed-off on him, and now he's hen-pecked enough to go out and doing some work as bread-winner, evidently.
CONCLUSION: Thus Maynard now has opportunity to gaining perspective for things patriotic, cultural, and blogging. I'm sure Maynard did the best he could, as blogger, and he's not without some talent, so I wouldn't be surprised if he does well in present pursuits. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
Thanks Phaedrus, I appreciate your kind words. Yes, blogger shut me down, but I'm not surprised, they've shut me down before.
The truth is, I can start another blog and call it "anotherblog.blogspot.com and peole will come, because they want to hear the unvarnished truth.
Phaedrus, I wouldn't concern yourself with what apollonian thinks about your pov on any matter, nobody bothers to read apollonian's verbose and unstimulating nonsense. I carefully monitored my blogs traffic via activemeter and not once in over 600,000 visits since January 2008 did anyone ever come to my blog via google or yahoo to read an apollonian article.
The one consistency common with all apollonian essays was that he was generally the only one to comment on them. In short, apollonian is a legend in his own mind and his rhetoric shouldn't be classified as that of an intellectual, more like a stubborn child without a firm grasp of the importance of sentence structure and clarity. His writings remind me of those I might see a freshman psychology student produce.
On top of that, apollonian is an ingrate, manifested by the fact that he's badmouthed me despite the fact that I actually posted much of his worthless material on my blog, which as I previously stated wasn't bringing me an traffic whatsoever.
Lastly, I'd like to say to apollonian right here and now that I've reached out and touched the lives of more people in a single day with a single article that I've written than you have in your entire mediocre existence - for you to suggest to anyone that you "understand" me or what I'm doing at ths moment is a fucking farce you little half brained twit. I'd like to kick the fucking teeth out of your effeminate mouth you pissant cocksucker!
I'm far from being done with blogging, I made it quite clear in my last post that it was a temporary hiatus. One thing is for sure apollonian, regardless of whether I return in a month or three, when I do, more people will read my first post within a week than the total number of people that have struggled through any one of your pathetic missives since you first sat down at a keyboard.
Curt Maynard
Curt Maynard: Presumptuous, Pretentious Sinner, Needs Chastising
(Apollonian, 31 Aug 08)
Hey Curt, facts are facts--and u know what comrade?--though I'm 55 yrs old and presently somewhat under-nourished due to being such poverty-stricken hero, u being at least 15 yrs younger (I understand) and with obvious comparative advantage of relative youth--I absolutely accept ur challenge, chump-brains. Curt, there isn't any question in my mind u're a gross, pathetic weakling, just as I describe in previous essay/entry, above. U're a hen-pecked zero.
Strategically, I intend to slap u silly as u make ur desperate, girl-like lunges; then after u're well tuckered-out I may commence to kicking crap out of u. I haven't had too many physical fights lately in my life, having learned to being discrete in my elder yrs. I'm 5'10" and about 160-165 lbs, known and feared for being extremely quick--when I was younger, at any rate.
I may presently be a little aged, yes, but intellectually I honestly consider myself much like Vladimir Klitschko compared to Curt Maynard--a gross piddling little twerp (as far as I'm concerned). Too bad people don't have ur blog still around to be able to compare our posts and essays. But I still have a body of work collected at NewNation.org under "commentary" heading, never forget.
And note, I didn't deny u, Curt, had SOME talent--u're not a complete fool, just not too overly talented--I emphasize u have reached ur level of incompetence according to the "Peter Principle"--have u ever hrd of it? I suspect ur dear little daughters have surely puffed u up a bit excessively for ur imagined and wished-for wisdom.
U see Curt, not only are u pathetic weakling--but it extends to ur actually becoming a liar inasmuch as u over-reach for ur logic pretending ur vague and generalized conclusions are justified given ur stupid premises which are also quite vague or irrelevant--as for ur babbling about "sentence-structure." Curt, u think and reason too often like a female, u poor fool; I spit.
Observe how, as in my above entry-post, I actually make a case, socio-biologic (see KevinMacDonald.net), detailed, specific, and orderly for logic--U CAN'T EVEN ADDRESS THESE DETAILS in specific manner, u poor, brainless idiot, though u babble on as u do.
For example: tell the people whether I'm right about ur "good-evil" pretensions by which u patronize the people at child's level of "intellect" upon which u pretend to pontificate, brainless moron. Was my statement regarding u true or not, yes or no?
U "touch people's lives"?--sounds so stupidly like the abstracted air-heads on "Smoking Mirrors" Jew site, which Jew blogger u were so desperate to suck-up to that u wouldn't even publish my posting in ur comments area for ur blog, u pathetic COWARD. Ck comments on KennySideShow.blogspot.com, "The Strange Moments...," 25 July 08, for interesting dialectic and commentary on this specific ("Smoking Mirrors") subject.
And when I so commented on Bill White's blog (OverThrow.com/blog) to effect u were "playing the girl," gee I guess it made u so mad, u thought I was "ingrate," thou brainless, presumptuous scum.
Curt, I was only playing along w. u, letting u pretend u were patronizing me, u poor dumbass--don't u get it? Note what a correspondent I've been, working so closely, in such detail, w. such as A. Linder/VNN (VanguardNewsNetwork.com), now Curt Maynard, and several others too. People can disagree, but they need to address the details and specifics I'm capable of presenting--so devastatingly, as we see in Maynard's case.
CONCLUSION: So don't doubt, Curt Maynard, when we meet, I'm going to deal w. u quite harshly, comrade--to think a weakling and inferior like u would even imagine attempting to patronizing an honest, serious, saintly, and substantial theologian like myself. But if u send me 500 dollars, I'll consider forgiving ur gross sins. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
appollonian,
Please do not include me, even as a reference, in this bullshit.
And here on the Phaedrus blog. This doesn't appear to be a forum for petty grievances. Most of us have better things to do and are not into this divisiveness.
As I've said before, if you have problems with some people, move on.
This doesn't help anything.
Youth Needs Be Taught Lesson Not To Be Easily Forgotten; Experience Needs Due Respect
(Apollonian, 31 Aug 08)
Kenny, if u want(ed) to pretend to remaining "cool" then u shouldn't have said anything at all whatsoever regarding this little contest I've provoked w. the lightweight, Curt Maynard. Note it's fair fight: young lightweight against older, seasoned heavyweight who's still quite confident.
If u want to be objective-type editor, I suggest u heed to obvious advice: "bullshit" IS NOTHING BUT UR OPINION, comrade Ken. Again, if u want to pretend to substance as editor, THEN LET THE PEOPLE DECIDE for themselves. Do u really think folks are so desperate for ur advice? And note u can always post ur comments as u see appropriate.
Observe now ur post is itself an attempt to "spin" things--as regarding ur somewhat hysterical OPINION regarding "divisiveness."
I don't think it's "petty grievance" at all, which again is MERELY UR OPINION, get it? We rather have major difference of opinion concerning serious substance of the patriot problem--regarding "raising alarms" OR more careful, judicious analysis as I present, my presentations being now be-littled and disparaged by a pea-brained editor like Maynard who is willingly victimized and patronized by Jews, as I document.
Interesting is it not, comrade Ken, how first u indicate u have "better things to do," but then, regardless, u frantically (and so quickly, I notice) get in the "middle of it" all--while protesting at same time u don't want to be in "middle of it."
So Ken, consider my own advice to u, okay comrade?--and that's this: while I respect u, etc., u need to figure out I'm going to do what I think is appropriate and entertaining, do not doubt.
Curt Maynard, for one, and perhaps u too, needs to find out who's "strong" around here--as in the large patriot movement. Did u see that young guttersnipe called me, "little half brained twit"? So now we need to see who's really "little," I'd say, among other things.
Here's yet further advice: consider u're quite wrong, comrade Ken--not that u are, but just imagine (consider). Question then is what we'll get out of this little "debate" btwn myself and the lightweight so passionate for the females.
For aside fm substantial, legitimate difference of opinion we discover about content of patriot dialectic/discourse ("raising alarm" vs. analysis and specific plan), we also have question of method--as for concluding in proper logic, founded in specific details, speaking to particular arguments broached, etc.
Maynard says I have problem(s) w. "sentence structure"--so what does the dear youngster mean exactly?--does this statement of his make any real sense?--or is it just another womanly-type gibe?
So now at this point comrade editor Ken, perhaps u see this is not mere "tempest in teacup," eh?
Consider further the difficult spot u've gotten urself in, Ken: by even responding to this present challenge of mine to u specifically, u then urself will tend to belie ur previous statement to effect it should be merely ignored--eh?
Ken, our young guttersniping girly-man, Maynard, has also taken shots at a couple of people I respect, one Hal Turner (HalTurnerShow.blogspot.com), a magnificent, outspoken hero, editor, and patriot; another being Bill White (OverThrow.com/blog)--both of these never hesitating, basically, to publish so much of my incisive analysis. White can be picky--but not out of lack of intellect or forthright masculine-type courage.
Maynard thinks he's tough, comrade Ken, and I've waited patiently; now please, kindly step back, old man, and try not to getting in my way, okay? We're going to find out who's strong here, and I haven't kicked any behinds lately in my old age--though I really don't feel that old, u know--and besides, I have an easy target/victim. Get the picture?
CONCLUSION: I don't intend to hurt the little bastard too much--but he needs to learn respect for a veteran who has much stronger, genuine grasp of strategy--and who isn't too weak, even yet, for hand-to-hand tactics either. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
[Commentary by Apollonian, within text of Curt Maynard, below, capped and bracketed. Maynard seems to have forgotten this is proper blog to be posting his nasty stuff. A.]
curt maynard said...
"apollonian is almost certainly a Jew and/or agent provacateur, he constantly touts the alleged virtues of known government informants, Bill White and Hal Turner. [I SIMPLY CHALLENGE MAYNARD TO PRESENT ANY EVIDENCE. FURTHER I NOTE MAYNARD REPEATS THE ALLEGATIONS OF SPLC JEW-QUEER ORGANIZATION TO SAME EFFECT, REGARDING GOOD PATRIOT COMRADE HAL TURNER (HalTurnerShow.blogspot.com). AND SAME GOES FOR BILL WHITE (OverThrow.com/blog)--LET MAYNARD SAY WHAT HE KNOWS AND REALLY HAS AGAINST BILL WHITE. MAYNARD IS SIMPLY A COWARDLY EFFEMINATE WHO REFUSES TO SPECIFY AND SUBSTANTIATE HIS ABSURD CHARGES AND ACCUSATIONS.]
"Be careful Phaedrus, apollonian often inserts threats within the text of his unreadable essays and comments,... [YES, BUT REMEMBER "THREATS" CAN BE VAGUE AND GENERAL AND QUITE HARMLESS, LEGALLY SPEAKING. SOME "THREATS," IF THEY'RE SPECIFIC ENOUGH, CAN BE LEGALLY ACTIONABLE. NOTE THAT SIMPLY BEING CHRISTIAN ANTI-SEMITIC IS ITSELF "THREATENING" TO JEW QUEERS.]
"...which then enables him to report them [his own commentary] to google who can then use that as an excuse to ban/suppress the blog thay were posted on. [THIS HERE IS QUITE FAR-FETCHED, WHICH OF COURSE I'VE NEVER DONE. MAYNARD MERELY, IN TYPICAL FEMININE-HYSTERICAL FASHION, BRINGS UP SOMETHING HYPOTHETICAL AT BEST, AND FOR WHICH THE IDIOT HASN'T THE SLIGHTEST EVIDENCE--WHAT A TOTAL BRAINLESS MORON.]
"I refused to post many of his essays in the past for this very reason, and told him so. [MAYNARD DID THIS MAYBE TWICE OR PERHAPS THREE TIMES. I REMEMBER ONCE I GOT A LITTLE CARRIED AWAY AND WROTE ABOUT HOW GOOD I THOUGHT IT WAS FOR THE IDEA OF REMOVING JEWS (AS FM EXISTENCE), AND MAYNARD WROTE BACK HE DIDN'T WANT TO PUBLISH IT AS IT WOULD GIVE EXCUSE FOR BANNING HIS BLOG--WHICH I ACKNOWLEDGED AT THE TIME. SO HERE MAYNARD BEGINS WITH A GRAIN OF TRUTH, BUT THEN, TYPICALLY, IN FEMINISTIC FASHION, BLOWS IT OUT OF PROPORTION.]
"Being that reading his commentary is so painful, i.e. the guy can't put a sentence together to save his fucking life, many if not most people that approve and post his commentary aren't likely to read through it and thus won't find the threats he often inserts in the text. [HERE I SUBMIT MAYNARD IS RATHER LYING FOR HIS TYPICAL FEMINISTIC-TYPE LOGIC--QUESTION IS WHAT HE MEANS BY "OFTEN." BUT PHAEDRUS HIMSELF HAS DEALT NOW WITH QUITE A BIT OF MY COMMENTARY AND CAN WELL JUDGE ON HIS OWN.]
"apollonian is a charlatan - don't be fooled by him. Nothing he writes will ever be seen again on my blogs. [OHHHH, BOOO HOOOO HOOOO....]
"Once you've stopped posting his crap, he'll be once again relegated back to his well deserved obscurity at the Jew owned and operated newnationnews." [WOW, HERE'S YET ANOTHER GRATUITOUS SLAM AGAINST AN EXCELLENT, GOOD MAN AT NewNation.org. AND I CHALLENGE THE EFFEMINATE CURT MAYNARD TO TELL THE WORLD EXACTLY WHAT HE KNOWS. I ABSOLUTELY GUARANTEE MAYNARD SURELY DOESN'T EVEN KNOW NewNationNews EDITOR'S NAME.]
September 2, 2008 6:56 AM
[Commentary by Apollonian, in below text by Maynard, capped, bracketed. A.]
curt maynard said...
"Phaedrus,
"I just had to show you real quick what a degenerate sycophant this pig apollonian is. [HEY, NO ONE'S PERFECT--I'M JUST A LITTLE SLOPPY SOMETIMES WHEN I GET HUNGRY.]
"He wrote in an above comment:
""apollonian said...
Phaedrus Well And Valiantly Approaches "Good-Evil" Issue For Instruction, Even If In Failure
(Apollonian, 30 Aug 08)" [WELL, IF U NOTICE IN THIS QUOTATION, I ADMIT I'M TRYING TO DISAGREE W. COMRADE PHAEDRUS--SO I DON'T SEE HOW THIS IS REALLY SO "SYCOPHANTIC."]
"apollonian will literally lick your asshole if you post his crap - he'll prostrate himself like a lil bitch if you pay any attention to his ignorant rambling - but once you've chosen to ignore and/or ban his commentary and POV he'll attack you just like one would expect an immoral Jew to do. [THERE MAY BE SOME GRAIN OF TRUTH TO THIS--EXCEPT OF COURSE FOR THE PART ABOVE, "LITERALLY LICK YOUR ASSHOLE," AND MAYNARD IS OBVIOUSLY LIAR WHO HAS NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER FOR THIS GROSS CHARACTERIZATION OF HIS. REGARDING "ATTACKING"--YES INDEED, I HAVE DONE THIS, BUT ESP. WHEN EDITOR POSTS SOMETHING AGAINST ME OR WHAT I'VE WRITTEN AND THEN DOESN'T ALLOW ME TO REPLY--I FIND IT SO PERTURBING. BUT JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE DOESN'T POST MY STUFF I DON'T NECESSARILY ALWAYS ATTACK. SO WE SEE HOW FULL OF SHIT MAYNARD IS--DO U THINK MAYNARD IS A LITTLE "DISTURBED" AND SLIGHTY HYSTERICAL? NOTE EFFEMINATE TYPES TEND TO GET THAT WAY.]
"Just so you know Phaedrus, below are some comments apollonian submitted to me where his sycophancy is blatantly apparenmt for all to see. [I SUSPECT MAYNARD IS OVER-EMPHASIZING AND BLOWING THINGS "OUT OF PROPORTION" IN HIS TYPICAL EFFEMINACY.]
"THIS is how he baits you into posting his commentary- an old Jew trick really, butter you up in order to "set you up." Bear in mind how the deviant kisses my ass [HONESTLY, I NEVER THOUGHT OF IT THAT WAY--BUT WE SEE HOW MAYNARD HIMSELF THINKS.]
"...and then consider what the piece of shit has recentl;y said about me. Phaedrus, no matter how you approach it, you're next. [NOTE I NEVER SAID MAYNARD WAS UTTERLY WITHOUT TALENT, AND I'VE ALWAYS ADMITTED HE IS NOT COMPLETELY INCAPABLE--WHAT I EMPHASIZED WAS HE REACHED HIS "PETER PRINCIPLE" LEVEL OF INCOMPETENCY. MAYNARD IS PRESENTLY MERELY SELF-DESTRUCTING FOR HIS HYSTERICISM AND DEMONSTRATING HIS WEAKNESS FOR LOGIC.]
"1. Curt Maynard Foremost Editor, Genuine Leader Of Real Patriot Movement, Indubitably [WELL, AFTER ALL, HE DID PRINT AND PUBLISH MY STUFF DIDN'T HE?--SO I THOUGHT HE DESERVED SOME PRAISE. MAYNARD, THOUGH HE TENDS TO EFFEMINACY, IS GOOD FOR "GENERAL INTEREST" -TYPE TOPICALITY, I'D SAY, EVEN NOW, AND GIVEN THIS TALENT OF HIS, HE FEATURES A CERTAIN ABILITY. BUT WHEN MAYNARD GETS HYSTERICAL, HE'S REAL LOSER--AS WE SEE HERE AND NOW.]
"(Apollonian, 12 Jul 08)
"Indeed, comrade Phaedrus (see WorldPeace-Phaedrus, "Read the Irrepressible...," 12 Jul 08), and in all seriousness, Curt Maynard (CurtMaynardsBlog.blogspot.com) is surely one of very topmost blogsters and general internet info sources for one unquestionable and verifiable reason: literateness and scholarship (as the two go together), but MOST especially that scholarly quality which isn't easily duplicated. [WELL, THIS ISN'T UN-TRUE, I'D SAY, ESPECIALLY GIVEN THE COMPETITION. WHEN MAYNARD APPLIES HIMSELF PROPERLY HE ISN'T TOO BAD. BUT WHEN HE GETS HYSTERICAL, AS PRESENTLY, HE'S SAD SPECTACLE. OBSERVE HIS ORIGINAL POSTING OF THIS VERY ENTRY WASN'T EVEN ON THE PROPER, APPROPRIATE BLOG OF PHAEDRUS'S.]
""2. apollonian said...
[Thanks much good comrade editor Curt. Note Les Visible followed his strong essay, "9/11... The Truth...," 24 Jun, with a real stinker (as I note below), "Jacque Fresco...," 27 Jun, which then I criticised in below-copied entry--FOR WHICH THEN VISIBLE BANNED ME (see further below dialecticals). I trust my essays/entries will speak well enough for themselves. A.] [I DON'T SEE ANYTHING TOO TERRIBLE ABOUT THIS QUOTATION FM ME, BUT MAYNARD IS A DESPERATE FEMALE, AS WE SEE.]
"3. (Apollonian, 5 Jun 08)
"I'm great fan of mighty birdman [No he isn't - he;'s attacked the birdman too] (theBirdman.org), visiting his site almost daily. I know of J. Quick (see JeffreyQuick.wordpress.com, "I Heard a little birdy...," 22 Apr 08)--fm the mighty birdman, as matter of fact--and Quick is full of smarm and smug, a real Pharisee, indubitably, who simply enjoys, quite obsessively, I observe, pontifficating, like typical Pharisee, to prove how "moral" he is, such an inferiority complex he has, obviously. For who needs to be "good" who doesn't begin w. that inferiority complex in first place? [SO I "ATTACKED" BIRDMAN ONCE OR TWICE--MAYBE EVEN THREE OR FOUR TIMES--SO WHAT?--WHY COULDN'T I STILL BE "FAN" AS I CONTINUE TO CK HIS SOMETIMES NEAT SITE. AGAIN, WE SEE MAYNARD, THE EFFEMINATE, HAS DIFFICULTY WITH STRICTEST LOGIC.]
"4. CONCLUSION: Maynard is also most excellent practical illustrator and photo-editor too. So when honest and serious evaluation is made for quality in all the various departments for public information, Curt Maynard has to come out very near topmost, if not very top itself. [WELL, I DON'T SEE WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS TEXT OF MINE, ESPECIALLY GIVEN MY NOTES AND REASONABLE QUALIFICATIONS, AS ABOVE, FOREGOING.]
"Thus Maynard's scholarship--which is absolutely essential for quality of info--is so well balanced for general readability and public interest for knowledge. Thank goodness for such practical heroes like Curt Maynard. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian [YES, MAYNARD FULFILLS A NECESSARY FUNCTION FOR CULTURE AND PEOPLE--AS WHEN HE PUBLISHES MY IMPORTANT MATERIAL. BUT WHEN HE FAILS, HE DESERVES CENSURE. I DON'T SEE WHAT I REALLY NEED APOLOGIZE FOR. NOTE AGAIN, I NEVER SAID MAYNARD WAS ENTIRELY WITHOUT TALENT--HE JUST HAS EFFEMINATE TENDENCIES WHICH SOMETIMES OVERCOME HIS EFFECTIVENESS WHEN HE GETS TOO HYSTERICAL, THE PATHETIC DUMB-ASS.]
"etc... etc....
"CONCXLUSION - apollonian is an ingrate piece of shit [FLATTERY WILL GET ONE NOWHERE WITH ME, COMRADES; BESIDES NO ONE IS PERFECT, DON'T FORGET.]
"...and probable Jew [NOTE A JEW IS BY DEFINITION A TALMUDIST, WHICH TALMUD I'VE ALWAYS, CONSISTENTLY DENOUNCED IN MOST UNMISTAKABLE TERMS, ETC.]
"...based on his behavior and the fact that he supports two known informants, Bill White and Hal Turner,... [MAYNARD IS AN EFFEMINATE LIAR WHO UTTERLY FAILS TO PRODUCE ANY EVIDENCE, ONCE AGAIN, LIKE THE GROSS FEMALE-ORIENTED MORON HE IS. I'LL NOTE BOTH HAL TURNER AND B. WHITE TEND NOT TO DEFER TO EFFEMINATE-TYPES LIKE MAYNARD, SO MAYBE CURT IS A LITTLE MIFFED.]
"...AND based upon the fact that he surreptitiously inserts threats within the text of his comments and essays." [STUPID EFFEMINATE MORON GIVES NO EVIDENCE, THOUGH I'VE ALREADY COMMENTED UPON THIS "THREAT" SUBJECT (ABOVE). DON'T FORGET ALL TRUE PATRIOTS ARE "THREATS" IN GENERAL SENSE TO JEWS, ET AL.]
September 2, 2008 7:25 AM
Has Curt Maynard Become Un-Hinged?
(Apollonian, 2 Sep 08)
Wow--I note Curt Maynard has a new blog up (CurtMaynardsNewestBlog.blogspot.com), and for his first posting, "You Just Can't...," 2 Sep 08, he wrote the following:
"One thing you'll never again see at my newest blog are any "apollonian" articles, if that's what you can call them. When I have time later, I'll write up an expose revealing what a kike this guy is. In the past when I was posting some of his unreadable essays, I've had to reject many of them based upon threats he inserted in them out of concern that the threats would enable blogger to censor my blog. I'd bet money that I missed a few of these threats and that the bastard himself reported his own essays to blogger and had my last blog shut down.
"No matter, apollonian won't be missed by me, or anyone else."
* * * * *
So I guess the effeminate one, so sensitive, SERIOUSLY thinks I would do such kind of thing, (a) write "threats" then (b) report such threats to Google/blogger.
CONCLUSION: So is Curt Maynard become un-hinged, or what? I leave it to u, good reader. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
To apollonian above:
Nigger, I haven't even begun.
Maynard: The Burn-Out
(Apollonian, 2 Sep 08)
Oh, wooooohoohooohoooooo. . . .
Dig this: First Maynard says no one cares about or reads Apollonian--and now the moronic little girl tells me he hasn't "even begun." "Begun"--to do what, u idiot? Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
[Below text is copied fm NewsFromTheWest.blogspot.com, "Maynard's Back...," 2 Sep 08; I thought it would be most appropriately placed here to help complete the wonderful dialectic we've produced so far. A.]
apollonian said...
[Commentary by Apollonian, in below text by "Voir Dire," capped, bracketed. A.]
Anonymous said...
"So is Curt Maynard become un-hinged, or what?"
"I don't know how to gently break this to you, [JUST SPIT IT OUT--PERHAPS WITHOUT STARTING W. TOO MUCH "CLEVERNESS" OR SARCASM, AS THAT TENDS TO MAKE THINGS COMPLICATED FOR WEAK-MINDED PEOPLE LIKE URSELF--BEGIN W. DETAILS AND FACTS AS PREMISES AND WORK TO UR CONCLUSION. TRY TO SAY SOMETHING. HAVING READ THROUGH UR BRAINLESS TEXT ALREADY, I SEE U'RE JUST ANOTHER PHARISAIST-MORALIST ATTEMPTING TO DEFEND "GOOD-EVIL" HERESY/FALLACY/DELUSION WITHOUT A REAL ARGUMENT OF ANY SUBSTANCE.]
"...apollonian, but judging from the commentary I've been following on Phaedrus' website and the posts you have written here, I submit YOU are the one who sounds increasingly unhinged and has for some time now. [OKAY, U PRETEND TO SUBMIT A CONCLUSION, BUT U DON'T SAY EXACTLY WHAT ARE THE PREMISES--TYPICAL FOR PHARISAIST-MORALIST PUKE. WE'LL SEE IF U SAY ANYTHING OF SUBSTANCE IN BELOW TEXT.]
"You are clearly a vile, humorless, misanthrope [INDEED, U DON'T KNOW THE HALF OF IT--FOR I'M A SINNER, AND A "DIRTY WHITE BOY," WITHOUT THE SLIGHTEST DOUBT. MY SORT OF "HUMOR" WOULD CERTAINLY ESCAPE A MORON LIKE U, PHARISAIST SCUM.]
"...who has repeatedly attacked (and now threatened at least one) some of our greatest, most fearless patriots involved in this fight to unveil the Jews and their Jew World Order objectives. [WELL, I THINK U'RE AN IGNORANT MORON, OF COURSE, AND IF U'RE TALKING ABOUT MAYNARD, I SIMPLY DIRECT FOLKS TO CK THE DIALECTIC AT WorldPeace-Phaedrus.blogspot.com, 30 AUG 08 BLOGS, "IS 'EVIL'...," AND "A MESSAGE...." STRUGGLE AGAINST JEW HAS NOTHING TO DO W. "GOOD-EVIL" FOR CHILDREN AND BRAINLESS SHITS LIKE URSELF, AS I EMPHASIZE OVER AND AGAIN--IT'S MERELY A SOCIO-BIOLOGIC STRUGGLE OF "SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST," ETC., AS I'VE EXPOSITED NUMEROUS TIMES. IF U HAD ANY REAL BRAINS, U'D BE ABLE TO SUBSTANTIATE UR "GOOD-EVIL" THESIS, BUT OF COURSE U CAN'T. U OTHERWISE DON'T BOTHER TO ENGAGE ANY OF MY OWN CAREFULLY ARGUED EXPOSITIONS. U'RE JUST A PHARISAIST TRYING TO "BREAK A LANCE" FOR UR FELLOW MORALISTICS.]
"Even if someone GETS your important philosophical argument, [U SPEAK AS IF IT'S DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND: IT'S SIMPLE IN ACCORD W. SPENGLER AND CYCLIC HISTORY. THUS WHITE PEOPLE HAVE BECOME WEAK LIKE U, "VOIR DIRE," PRETENDING TO BEING PARAGON OF "GOOD," U BRAINLESS, SCUMMY PHARISEE--DEATH TO U. OUR PEOPLE NEED TO GET RID OF SHIT AND SCUM LIKE U, AND TO ACHIEVE HONESTY. THUS U.S.A. MUST REMOVE REGIME OF COUNTERFEITERS, ACHIEVE JEW-EXPULSION, ETC.]
"...how the hell is it supposed to behoove us in furthering our chances of defeating the Jews by recognizing they are merely doing what they believe they HAVE to do [BECAUSE SIMPLY THIS IS THE SCIENTIFIC, SOCIO-BIOLOGIC TRUTH, STUPID SHIT. JEWS ARE LIKE DISEASE-OF-OPPORTUNITY, TAKING ADVANTAGE OF GENTILE HUBRIS AND MORALISM, LIKE URS. JEWS JUST DO AS JEWS MUST DO--LIKE DISEASE TYPHUS DOES WHAT IT DOES--THERE'S NO "GOOD-EVIL" ABOUT IT, IDIOT. PROBLEM/TASK THEN IS TO SIMPLY TREAT THE DISEASE IN MATTER-OF-FACT, SCIENTIFIC MANNER, STUPID ASS, NOT PRETEND TO MORALISM, LIKE PUKE LIKE U.]
"...in order to survive and thrive as an ethnic people instead of (according to you, mindlessly, foolishly) branding such behavior as "evil?" [BECAUSE, SIMPLY, IT DOES NO GOOD, ACCOMPLISHES NOTHING--EXCEPT PERHAPS TO MAKING SCUM LIKE U FEEL SUPERIOR, RIGHTEOUS, AND "GOOD," EVIDENTLY, U BRAINLESS, STINKING SHIT. DEATH TO U, SCUM; WE ABSOLUTELY MUST REMOVE MORALISTIC-PHARISAIC SHIT LIKE U BEFORE WHITE RACE WILL BEGIN TO HAVE SERIOUS CHANCE TO SURVIVE AND PREVAIL.]
"I'm convinced all the patriots you so readily smear [U PIECE OF STINKING SHIT: FIRST, I DENOUNCE THE LIARS, PHARISEES, AND PRETENTIOUS SCUM LIKE U, WHO ARE MORE INTERESTED IN PRETENDING TO BEING "GOOD," AND I MAKE THIS ANALYSIS MOST PERFECTLY CLEAR IN ALL DUE DETAIL, U FILTHY SCUMMY PUKE.]
"...ARE dedicated to exposing the racially supremacist Judaic mentality of Jews-Must-Live-at-all-costs to the light of TRUTH. [U BRAINLESS, LYING SHIT--U JUST ADMITTED U'RE MORE INTERESTED IN PRETENDING TO BEING "GOOD"--U'RE NOT INTERESTED IN TRUTH OR HONESTY. FOR IT'S MERE CYCLIC HISTORIC/SOCIO-BIOLOGIC FUNCTIONING: JEWS, SUPREME LIARS, ACCORDING TO GOSP. JOHN 8:44, THRIVE UPON HUBRIS OF GENTILES, THUS PHARISAISM OF STUPID, OVER-POPULATED GENTILES WHO BELIEVE IN "GOOD-EVIL" PELAGIAN HERESY--LIKE URSELF. HENCE WE MUST REMOVE SCUMMY PHARISEES LIKE URSELF; U'RE THE ENEMY, STUPID MORON.]
"That Whites happen to collectively have consciences [STUPID, PRETENTIOUS SCUM: THAT IS UR OWN CONCEITED PRESUMPTION, TYPICALLY PHARISAIC. DEATH TO U, "VOIR DIRE." CHRISTIAN CULTURE MUST PROCEED UPON TRADITIONAL INDIVIDUALISM, ETC. "VOIR DIRE," I CANNOT EMPHASIZE IT ENOUGH--U ARE THE PROBLEM, AND U MUST BE REMOVED. DEATH TO U.]
"...and hearts regarding others (and a penchance for identifying wickedness as wickedness) IS what distinguishes us from the Jews and IS proving to be our downfall and perhaps ultimately our demise. [STUPID, PRETENTIOUS SCUM--I ALREADY ANALYZED IT DEFINITIVELY, CONCLUSIVELY, AND VERIFIABLY IN ACCORD W. ALL SCIENCE. PHARISAIST, MORALIST FILTH AND HUBRISTIC SCUM LIKE U ARE THE PROBLEM; U MUST BE REMOVED. IN BASIC TERMS, IN ACCORD W. CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY, ONCE AGAIN, IT'S TRUTH VS. LIES, HENCE WESTERN OBJECTIVITY VS. BABYLONIAN/JEW SUBJECTIVITY, ETC. SEE MY WORK AT NewNation.org UNDER "COMMENTARY" HEADING.]
"We desperately need to emulate the Jews in many ways for our OWN survival. [DEATH TO THE JEWS, AND DEATH TO U, "VOIR DIRE," ONCE AGAIN. WE SIMPLY NEED TO BE LIKE ROMANS OF EARLY 4TH CENT., ETC.]
"And how the hell exactly is calling our enlightened fellow bloggers "pukes" ["VOIR DIRE," U'RE BASICALLY A LIAR IN SAME WAY U'RE PHARISEE, FOR I ANALYZE MY OPPONENTS EXTREMELY CAREFULLY AND IN MUCH DETAIL. DEATH TO U, LYING, PHARISAIC SCUM.]
"...(if I recall correctly, you even senselessly, callously used that one on the rare Catholic who understands completely the Jews - Fr John. For the life of me, to what end????) ["FR. JOHN" IS MERELY ANOTHER PHARISEE AND A DISGUSTING MYSTIC/SUBJECTIVISTIC HERETIC; DEATH TO HIM TOO.]
"...and the slumbering American people "dumbasses" supposed to win over new recruits? ["VOIR DIRE," AGAIN, U'RE BASICALLY A LIAR, FOR I DO MUCH MORE FOR ANALYSIS THAN U MIS-LEADINGLY ALLEGE. DEATH TO U.]
"Can't you cut our people a little slack [AGAIN, "VOIR DIRE," U'RE DISGUSTING LIAR WHO MIS-REPRESENTS IN UR FILTHY SLIMEY INSINUATING MANNER. I APPEAL TO THE VOLK ON BASIS OF REASON AND HUMBLE CHRISTIANITY, AND I SPEAK THE TRUTH FORTHRIGHTLY--UNLIKE A LYING, SLIMEY PHARISEE LIKE U. DEATH TO U.]
"...when in all fairness they've been subjected to at least 50 years of 24/7 brainwashing and have never had a medium (until now) dedicated to highlighting their ongoing fiscal rape, dispossession and intended genocide. [BLAH, BLAH, U DISGUSTING LIAR. DEATH TO U.]
"Moreover, shame on you for referencing Maynard's children [DEATH TO U, AND DEATH TO MAYNARD TOO. "VOIR DIRE," U FILTHY, SCUMMY LIAR, U NEED SERIOUSLY TO HAVE UR UGLY FACE STEPPED UPON WITH GREATEST EMPHASIS AND CONTEMPT. IF MAYNARD THE GIRLY-MAN WANTS TO INVOKE HIS LITTLE KIDSOES, I CAN TOO, WHY NOT?]
"...in your misogynistic, bombastic tirades. You HAVE bitten the hand that fed you [ON THE CONTRARY, MAYNARD IS AN INFERIOR WHO PRETENDS HE'S NOT--AND U, U STINKING, SHITTY WHORE, ARE JUST TAKING MAYNARD'S SIDE AGAINST A DOUGHTY HERO AND WARRIOR OF GOD. DEATH TO U.]
"...and proven yourself extremely ungrateful. [DEATH TO U, "VOIR DIRE," U LYING, FILTHY HARPY. IT'S STRAIGHT-FORWARD, SIMPLE BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP, U STUPID SHIT; MAYNARD GETS TO PLAY "EDITOR," AND I'M CORRESPONDENT--GET IT?--IS THAT SO DIFFICULT? "VOIR DIRE," U SHOULD BE ASHAMED FOR UR IDIOT PRETENSION, BUT WHORES ARE NOTORIOUSLY SHAMELESS, AREN'T THEY?]
"...Curt Maynard generously gave you a forum ["VOIR DIRE," U'RE JUST A DISGUSTING, LYING, PHARISEE; MAYNARD AND I DID BUSINESS; THAT'S ALL, U STINKING, LYING PUKE. DEATH TO U. "VOIR DIRE," TO SAVE UR WORTHLESS LIFE, U NEED TO FACE REALITY, POOR, BRAINLESS SCUM.]
"...as did Phaedrus and Kenny, and you, the insufferable ingrate, burned those bridges ["VOIR DIRE," U'RE SUCH AN IDIOTIC LIAR--I'VE DONE OR SAID NOTHING WHATEVER AGAINST PHAEDRUS OR KENNY, AND IF I HAVE, I CHALLENGE A SHIT LIKE U TO PRESENT ANY EVIDENCE, U UTTERLY BRAINLESS FOOL.]
"...due to your megalomania and seething anger. [HEY, I'M MERE HUMBLE SINNER, AND DON'T FORGET, NO ONE'S PERFECT, DUMB-ASS.]
"If you truly are malnourished [NO STUPID, I ONLY SAID HEROICALLY AND SOMEWHAT "UNDER"-NOURISHED, U INCREDIBLY IDIOTIC, BRAINLESS MORON.]
"...(as you claim) owing to finances, I truly feel sorry for you. [DEATH TO U.]
"You really do need to seek help. [WELL DIP-SHIT, U MAY BE SURE I DO THE BEST I CAN, EVEN IN THE FACE OF SCUM LIKE U. "VOIR DIRE," U'RE JUST A STINKING FILTHY PHARISAIC--DON'T U SEE?--U'RE THE PROBLEM FOR OUR PEOPLE. U CAN HELP THE WHITE VOLK BY COMMITTING SUICIDE, U BRAINLESS SCUM.]
"If what you have to say is so compelling, [I DO THE BEST I CAN, LIKE ANY HEROIC SOLDIER OF CHRIST, U STINKING, PHARISAIC FILTH--THUS I SPEAK THE TRUTH.]
"...it begs the question of WHY you haven't started your own blog [I DO WHAT I THINK IS NECESSARY THING TO DO AT GIVEN TIME. IF U OR SOMEONE CAN PRESENT COMPELLING REASONS FOR ANY COURSE OF ACTION, THEN I MIGHT CONSIDER, BUT OF COURSE, U'RE TOO PHARISAIC FOR LOGICAL, RATIONAL, HONEST DISCUSSION, SO U REALLY SHOULD SAVE UR BREATH. I REALIZE U HAVE TO BREAK UR "LANCE" FOR UR HERO CURT, THE EFFEMINATE, MAYNARD, HOWEVER.]
"...instead of pressuring [LYING, FILTHY, SCUMMY WHORE, ONCE AGAIN. DEATH TO U.]
"...others to post your pieces. I suspect it is because you know it would be the disappointing equivalent of throwing a grand party only to have noone show." [RIGHT, U BRAINLESS PHARISAIC WHORE. SO AGAIN, IN SUM, U'RE JUST A PHARISAIC-MORALIST, AFTER ALL UR BALDERDASH IS SAID AND DONE, AND A LYING, INSINUATING, FILTHY DISEASE-RIDDEN PROSTITUTE ON TOP OF IT ALL. DEATH TO U. U HAVE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING OF ANY SUBSTANCE TO SAY WHATSOEVER BUT FOR IDIOT INSINUATIONS AND BRAINLESS, STUPID PRESUMPTION. "VOIR DIRE," SERIOUSLY, IT'S SHIT LIKE U WHICH IS GREATEST IMPEDIMENT FOR OUR PEOPLE. AND JEWS JUST TAKE ADVANTAGE; THEY'RE NOT "EVIL" ANYMORE THAN U'RE "EVIL." U'RE JUST A PATRONIZING, MORALIZING PIECE OF SHIT WHO GETS OFF BY IT, THAT'S ALL, AND JEWS LOVE IT.]
Voir Dire
September 3, 2008 8:59 PM
* * * * *
West Must Most Crucially Reject Pharisaism In Favor Of Honesty, Logic, Objectivity
(Apollonian, 3 Sep 08)
Thus I analyze, above, the ravings of Pharisaic "Voir Dire," filthy, scummy, lying, insinuating, patronizing whore, so pretentious, so moralistic--sooooooo "sensitive," eh?
Observe she has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING whatever to say of any substance--as about Maynard's seriously broached accusation I deliberately sabotage his blogging by writing "threats," etc.
But the stinking whore makes sure to throw in her filthy insinuations in her putrid patronizing manner. And the scummy harpy attempts to oppose me by myself against not only Maynard, u notice, but also she tries to place Kenny (KennySideShow.blogspot.com) and Phaedrus as partisans--is that slick?--what a disgusting virago, I swear.
Finally again, I challenge anyone to find an argument made by "Voir Dire" aside fm simply the iteration of "good-evil" so typically without criterion or premise, couched with and in that stock, slimey, Pharisaic-styled presumptuous insinuation. What a dirty, surely disease-ridden harlot. Death to u, "Voir Dire."
Such is the Pharisaic enemy, absolutely obsessed with "good-evil" Pelagian hereticalism, SO TOTALLY INCAPABLE of simplest HONESTY.
CONCLUSION: But above-rendered polemic (vs. "Voir Dire") does at least well-illustrate necessity of a cultural SEA-CHANGE fm Pharisaic "good-evil" madness which has gripped our people/volk and civilization since Rousseau, Kant, and Eng. Utilitarianism--to HONESTY, once again. And that necessary sea-change is surely best symbolized by rejection of childish Pharisaism-moralism and thus obligatory JEW-EXPULSION. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
September 3, 2008 11:26 PM
Ravages Of Delusion: Not A Pretty Sight
(Apollonian, 4 Sep 08)
I think it's good now and here to recap a bit and summarize what we've achieved for this blog's dialectic, esp. regarding Curt Maynard, the effeministic one--it has much to do with "good-evil" fallacy/delusion/heresy, and then regarding place this "good-evil" controversy has in large struggle of white race to survive.
Note then at root, struggle of white race to survive is strict, simple matter of socio-biology (see KevinMacDonald.net). Thus white race, formerly so successful since dawn of High Middle Age (about 1050 A.D.), suffered, and suffers presently still, "Decline of the West," by Oswald Spengler. What was the cause of such "decline"?
Thus history and socio-biology are cyclic and we observe over-populated white volk became obsessed/addicted with neo-Pelagian heresy and "good-evil" fallacy/delusion beginning at least w. Rousseau, then Kant and Eng. utilitarianism. Ck for further expo on "good-evil" and hist. cycle at NewNation.org, under "commentary" heading.
Observe now we are confronted w. the exemplary idiocy and gross irrationality of Pelagians in form of three outspoken exponents of such "good-evil," Maynard, Greg Bacon, and "Voir Dire." And observe the "modus operandi" of these typical Pharisaics: (a) Bacon is simply transparently stupid, his dumbness is quite straight-forward and un-complicated, (b) "Voir Dire" isn't too much different (fm Bacon); she tries to get a little more personal and psychologic, and merely repeats, repeats, as if she reifies thereby what only exists in her imagination, the mystic, mythic "good-evil" conceit.
Now observe Curt Maynard, the girly-man--who believes in "good-evil," by golly, because, well, he just thinks he should, that's all--just like a girly-man would, evidently.
And get a load of his (Maynard's) dialectic: he thinks I, Apollonian, should be "grateful" to him--but why?--well, because he thinks he does me great favor by publishing my stuff, u see. But gee, what else would Maynard publish on his blog if he didn't publish my stuff?--he's got to publish something, doesn't he?
Notice Maynard himself doesn't have too much to say on his own--otherwise he reports and retails and remarks upon other stuff, articles, etc., which he finds on other websites.
Personally, I think Maynard ought to be grateful to me--as I don't think too much of Maynard for any particular talent of his own, not that he doesn't have SOME talent, just not too overwhelmingly much. Evidently Maynard can't see we're fairly even for our respective attitudes: he thinks I'm "mediocre"; I think he's quite inferior and rather deluded, esp. for his brainless "good-evil" pretension.
To me, proof of Maynard's inferiority is he gets so bent-out-of-shape over idea I don't think I should be in any way "grateful"--he just can't and/or won't figure it out. So what can I do or say? I'm sure sooooooo "sorry" the poor, pathetic girly-man is so incensed I'm so "ungrateful," gee whiz--but hey, an adult ought to know he needs to get used to things, once it becomes clear it's the way things are. Is it the same attitude he has towards all correspondents to his blog?--pretty impractical, I'd say.
Note the drawbacks to "good-evil":
(a) it simply induces and encourages self-righteousness and Pharisaism,
(b) it's founded upon INFERIORITY COMPLEX and naturally so induces thereto,
(c) it promotes the quality of guilt as necessary product, hence inevitable fear and terror.
CONCLUSION: So anyway, I suggest comrades should look and see for themselves the sad consequences of Pharisaism-moralism and "good-evil" delusion. DELUSION HAPPENS TO ANYONE, BUT MOSTLY TO WEAK-MINDED PEOPLE--and that's why white people should drop their delusions, ESPECIALLY of "good-evil." Just look at the damage such delusion has done to our correspondent Pharisaics, above, Maynard, Bacon, and "Voir Dire." Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
[I thought it would be appropriate to note commentary on Curt Maynard by one of his good friends, a "liberal" by moniker of "nobody" at ChurchOfNobody.blogspot.com. Following, below-copied, is his latest blog text, appended to which are two comments. Pt. is, if u ck, "nobody" really does have an insight at the end when he note's Maynard's idiotic suspicion that I inserted "threats"--in order to then report such "threats" just for purpose of getting Maynard shut down. A.]
"Laugh? I just about shat myself!"
2 Comments - Hide Original Post Collapse comments
Oh man, it was just too beautiful.
But first an explanation. Regulars like Kikz and Tony know this story, but newer arrivals might be somewhat unfamiliar. This blog was not so long ago plagued by a one-note racist arsehole called Apollonian. He would endlessly urge us to embrace racism and 'Jew expulsion', whatever that is. He had two 'either/or' modes - sycophancy or character assassination. Me, I said lots of things to Apollonian. I told him he was mad. I told him he couldn't write for shit. And I told him that if he didn't exist, the Jews would have invented him anyway.
Anyway I banned him. He didn't care for this and spent a great deal of time and energy heaping shit on me over at Les Visible's smoking mirrors and Curt Maynard's blog. Finally Les banned him as well. Curt however embraced Apollonian to his bosom and would regularly post his mad unintelligible gibberish on the front page. Curt is a white supremacist doncha know.
Every now and then I google myself. It's not that interesting. When Mike Rivero used to link to me it was a blast but lately it's dull and I don't bother much. But I did it the other week and there seemed to be a link I didn't recognise. It was to Curt's blog, but, lo and behold, there was no Curt's blog. Curtmaynardsblog had been disappeared. Blogspot had blitzed him on account of, gee, I don't know... ugliness? Ha ha ha. Not that I was upset or anything, but I had intended to pop a note in the comments here just in case the people who'd been shat on there were interested.
But there he was back on WRH yesterday with an article entitled 'Why if they can censor Curt Maynard, Nobody's safe.' Chronically bad grammar aside, you'll be completely unsurprised that I thought this was brilliant. I headed straight over and, to hell with the article, piled into the comments and wrote how much I loved his headline. Well you can't blame me can you?
The article itself was dreary. It was him telling us how brave he is. Only he has the cojones to use words like 'nigger' and 'wetback'. Racist filth aside, it did have its lighter moments. To make his case for the rightness of calling black people 'niggers' he used the best analogy since sliced bread was run up the flagpole without a paddle.
Apparently, Curt is an adult and when he needs to urinate or defecate he doesn't say 'number one' or 'number two', therefore why should he use euphemisms when discussing 'niggers'? Surely I'm not the only one who gets the beauty of this analogy? (Curt mate, a word of advice - when you use analogies it pays to think them through. Had you done this you would have realised you just compared your use of racist language to you shitting and pissing. Not that I'm complaining. I reckon you precisely described your contributions to making the world a better place.)
But it gets better. The piece linked by WRH is the fifth in the new blog. Below it, the first post briefly announces his return and ends with the following passage -
"One thing you'll never again see at my newest blog are any "apollonian" articles, if that's what you can call them. When I have time later, I'll write up an expose revealing what a kike this guy is. In the past when I was posting some of his unreadable essays, I've had to reject many of them based upon threats he inserted in them out of concern that the threats would enable blogger to censor my blog. I'd bet money that I missed a few of these threats and that the bastard himself reported his own essays to blogger and had my last blog shut down.
No matter, apollonian won't be missed by me, or anyone else."
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
---
Curt thinking that Apollonian's task was to shut him down means that he still doesn't get it. Apollonian's task wasn't to put out the fire. It was merely to pour more petrol on it. And here's Curt announcing he can do this perfectly well on his own. I shake my head.
posted by nobody at 10:54 AM on Sep 4, 2008
the Silverfish said...
Tee Hee poor little Curty Poo. Like I have said before this asshole makes me almost ashamed to be white. It is funny with Curty and the Onion, talk about the pot calling the kettle Black. Get it?
September 4, 2008 12:29 PM
nobody said...
I get it, bra.
September 4, 2008 3:26 PM
[Here below-copied, is fm Curt Maynards "Newest" blog, "You Just Can't Keep...," 2 Sep 08, comments section, a dialectic exchange btwn the two aforementioned, w. "nobody."
Ask urself if u entirely approve Maynard's replies--are they really "manful" enough?--or is it the now typically girly-man -type response u're becoming more used to fm Maynard. Does Maynard remind u of Kevin Alfred Strom?
For example, why couldn't Maynard explain simple fact "Jew" is TALMUDIST, and then perhaps what a Talmudist really is? See RevisionistHistory.org, TruthTellers.org, and Come-and-hear.com for best Talmudic expo.
Regarding "racism"--isn't it just loyalty to one's race?--and isn't loyalty a virtue, pure and simple? Note these sort of direct, most manful -type replies are just beyond Maynard's abilities.
So what is Maynard really good for?--a serious question. I don't deny Maynard must be good for something--but is this guy distinctly effeminate, or what? Maynard was lucky he had Apollonian for a correspondent. Comments by Apollonian, below within text, capped, bracketed. A.]
nobody said...
Curt,
"It seems you don't get it, mate. [THUS EVEN "NOBODY" UNDERSTANDS THE COWARDLY WEAKNESS AND FAILURE OF NERVE AND SPIRIT BY THE GIRLY-MAN, MAYNARD. A.]
"We both object to Jewish control of the economy etc. Your answer to this is that we should all embrace racism. [YES, "RACISM"--LOYALTY TO ONE'S PEOPLE/CULTURE AGAINST THE JEW. A.]
"My answer is that we label Jews for what they are, ie. racists [THIS IS ACTUALLY TRUE--BUT WHAT IT RATHER SHOWS IS THE HYPOCRISY OF JEWS, WHICH JEWS THEMSELVES UNDERSTAND PERFECTLY. JEWS JUST HAVE SUCH CONTEMPT FOR MORALISTIC GENTILES THEY KNOW THEY CAN TELL THEM ANY LIE TO WIGGLE OUT. A.]
"...(indeed uber-racists), and object to them on an anti-racism basis. [THIS IS ACTUALLY DONE BY MANY JEWS--WITH NOTHING BUT CONTEMPT BY TOP-LEVEL JEWS IN RETURN. A.]
"Do you not find it curious that I was hated with a white hot passion by Apollonian? [ACTUALLY, "NOBODY" FLATTERS HIMSELF; APOLLONIAN MERELY MADE USE OF "NOBODY" AS PERFECT EXAMPLE OF A SUPREME PHARISEE. A.]
"He heaped endless shit on me here and you happily gave him a platform to do it. On the other hand you received nothing but crawl-up-your-arse sycophancy and adulation. [WELL, PERHAPS I "LAID IT ON" SOMEWHAT THICKLY, THE USUAL CORRESPONDENT'S "SUCKING-UP" TO THE EDITOR. INTERESTING MAYNARD TOOK IT SO SERIOUSLY, THE POOR GIRLY-MAN. A.]
"Does that not tell you something? [HERE, "NOBODY" OVER-REACHES, FOR IT SHOULD BE OBVIOUS IT'S MERELY USUAL "SUCKING-UP" BY CORRESPONDENT AS ABOVE-DESCRIBED. A.]
"Jews love racism. It's their weapon to split those who might oppose them. Of course Apollonian loved you. [YES, AS LONG AS MAYNARD DID AS I REQUIRED. A.]
"You are exactly the guy they're looking for. [YES. A.]
"And of course he hated me. [YES, BUT ONLY OBLIGATORILLY, AS ONE WOULD EXPECT HATRED FOR A PHARISEE. A.]
"The racism of Jews is their achilles heel. [ON THE CONTRARY, IT'S THEIR STRENGTH. A.]
"If one attacks them on it one becomes unassailable. ["NOBODY" FLATTERS HIMSELF, THE SMARMY LITTLE PUKE--BUT HE KNOWS HE HAS MAYNARD AT DISADVANTAGE. A.]
"And God forbid the goyim should stand united.
"The way to defeat Jewish control is to shine a spotlight on them. [TRUE. A.]
"We make clear the wickedness of their essential defining aspect of otherness. We get moderate Jews [NOBODY, THE LITTLE MORON, JUST FOOLS HIMSELF--FOR A JEW IS A TALMUDIST, BY DEFINITION, NEVER FORGET. A.]
"...to look at themselves in a new light. We do not attack them. [AGAIN, "NOBODY" FOOLS HIMSELF, FOR JEWS ARE TALMUDISTS, HENCE COLLECTIVISTS IN ESSENCE. A.]
"We assist them. We deprogram them from their 'us-and-them' mindset. [HERE "NOBODY" REVEALS HIS UTTER, BRAINLESS IGNORANCE OF ESSENCE OF JEW--NOBODY PATRONIZING AND CONDESCENDING THESE JEW MONSTERS, FOOLING ONLY HIMSELF. A.]
"When you attack them on a racist basis you reinforce their defining mindset. ["NOBODY" INCOMPETENTLY PRETENDS TO ANALYZE JEWS, THE IGNORANT FOOL. A.]
"As for Ap, I can't say I told you so, since I didn't tell you so. But I did say that if Ap didn't exist, the Jews would invent him anyway. [YES, WELL JEWS DO UNDERSTAND THEY'RE ULTIMATE LIARS--THEY JUST HAVE DIFFICULTY FACING TRUTH--HENCE TRUTH-TELLERS LIKE MIGHTY APOLLONIAN, I SAY. A.]
"Just like they invented Bill Weiss over at stormfront. And then there's you. Here you are doing the job they would otherwise be paying people to do, and you do it for free! [INDEED, LOWER-LEVEL JEWS LIKE MIKE RIVERO (WhatReallyHappend.com) MAKE USE OF MAYNARD TO ENHANCE LOWER-LEVEL JEWS RESISTANCE TO ZIONISTS WHOSE PRESSURE LOWER-LEVEL JEWS, LIKE RIVERO, RESENT. A.]
"Mate, wake up to yourself." [YES, MAYNARD SHOULD UNDERSTAND WHAT HE'S ABOUT, THE POOR HALF-ASSED GIRLY-MAN. MAYNARD PRETENDS HE'S A "LEADER," EVIDENTLY, WITHIN PATRIOT MOVEMENT, BUT NOT REALLY. A.]
September 3, 2008 6:04 PM
Anonymous said...
"Nobody, I'm not going to attempt to convince you that my POV is the way to go [THIS IS WELL-SAID, FOR MAYNARD HIMSELF IS SO HALF-ASSED, SUCH A WEAKLING, IN ALL TRUTH, HE DOESN'T REALLY UNDERSTAND ENTIRELY WHAT HE'S ABOUT, WHAT PATRIOT MOVEMENT REALLY IS ABOUT, ETC., AS I'VE PT'D OUT. A.]
"...- if you don't like it you don't have to come here. [U TELL HIM, GIRLY-MAN. A.]
"Trust me, you're not going to change my mind in these matters - these are issues I've carefully considered for more than two decades. [YES, IN HIS HALF-ASSED, GIRLY-MANNISH MANNER--LIKE KEVIN A. STROM, NO DOUBT. A.]
"apollonian is a piece of shit, [SPOKEN LIKE A REAL GIRLY-MAN A.]
"...and in retrospect I shouldn't have allowed him to vent on my blog. [OBSERVE GIRLY-MAN ESSENTIALLY APOLOGIZES TO THE PIECE-OF-SHIT, "NOBODY" A.]
"It's a mistake I will never repeat again.
"I will say this though, multiculturalism, tolerance and diversity are a bit like buying commodities on margin, it's a Jewish game, and if you want to play it, you got to play be their rules. Good luck to you. [WELL, GIRLY-MAN FIGURES HE'S SAID A LOT, EVIDENTLY--GIRLY-MAN IS SATISFIED. A.]
"Know this Nobody, just so long as you keep the Zionist Jew in your sites, you'll get nothing but support from me - [THUS GIRLY-MAN CONSIDERS HE'S "STOOD UP" FOR HIMSELF SUFFICIENTLY TO "NOBODY." A.]
CM
September 3, 2008 7:51 PM
Ha ha ha ha, sorry to be laughing Phaedrus, but it seems it's your turn to be 'host' to the apple onion.
You know that quote of Kissinger's about anyone who's been hated for two thousand years must be doing something wrong? Welcome to Apollonian! Anyone who's been banned from as many blogs as him etc. etc...
Will anyone give me odds on how long Phaedrus lasts? Phaedrus, I'll give you a month tops before you're forced to a new comments policy. All the best...
PS Don't worry about being put on Ap's shit-list. Me, I wear it as a badge of honour.
Think you should settle down a bit Apoplexian. You might give yourself an aneurism.
What exactly is your point with all this Shit canning ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mX69T2Xm7Ag
Maynard Should Take Heed Of Lessons Taught
(Apollonian, 5 Sep 08)
"Mindmeld," thanks for ur comment, comrade--u ask, what is going on?
And I submit we're observing Curt Maynard in midst of achieving one of those moments of self-discovery, as here, when he imagined he would take on mighty Apollonian, combat theologian, part-time exorcist, Christian patriot--ck the very second entry-post to this blog's comment section. What an incredible excellent dialectical this blog has afforded.
Curt Maynard simply observes "Peter Principle" in operation and effect--seriously.
Curt Maynard: who is he, really?--note he's still fairly, somewhat young, relatively. In short he's someone, who started out honestly enough, actually quite creditably, who decided for himself, evidently, he's had enough of "politically correct" balderdash. So far, so good.
Problem then w. Maynard is he discovered he actually was somewhat ahead of other patriots for that "edjumacation," and imagined thereby he was so much "smarter" than others--which he really isn't--though, to be sure, he's probably a little "smarter" than the average--but by how much, actually?--not too much, I'm afraid, as we see.
For observe Maynard is so lacking for serious patriot themes: (a) he's not very enthusiastically Christian, if at all; (b) observe how really weak he is for the "conspiracy" theme, esp. regarding COUNTERFEIT scam of Federal Reserve Bank (Fed)--see RealityZone.com for expo/ref.
(c) Though Maynard pretends to being historian, he doesn't really seem to understand the working of historic CYCLES, as exposited by Oswald Spengler in "Decline of the West," for foremost example, even after I've emphasized the concept and author's name and title of the work, time after time after time. Maynard has a very thick skull for one who pretends to erudition.
Note further some interesting things: (1) Maynard imagines he can score cheap pt.s by calling people "Jews"--which isn't too bad tactic, actually, but in my case it doesn't work as I actually have a ready source (NewNation.org) to back up my unquestionable anti-semitic qualifications and accomplished works. Thus Maynard ends looking quite like the flustered petulant child whose nasty lashing-out goes awry.
(2) Maynard often plays coy, in that distinctly girl-like manner, rather similar to mighty Birdman (TheBirdman.org).
(3) Maynard's reasoning is also womanish as when he attempts to defend and justify his "good-evil" prejudice--he just "feels" like it's appropriate to use such verbiage, as he explains in his so fetching female-styled coyness.
(4) Maynard over-reaches as when he attacks solid, serious patriots and more manful types like Hal Turner (HalTurnerShow.blogspot.com) and Bill White (OverThrow.com/blog)--rather unfortunate for Maynard as these fellows are easily Maynard's equal for intellect and ability.
Note regarding Turner and White, as Maynard makes his girl-like allegations, which are typically weak, repetitious, and utterly without serious substantiation--as when Maynard attacks Bill White, Maynard can only babble and babble and babble, never actually specifying anything real, un-deniable, and un-mistakable, imagining that with lots of girl-like words and chatter, weak-minded readers would conclude, golly, there must actually be SOMETHING there within all the verbiage and balderdash--I tried to warn old Curt about that.
Thus overall, one begins to observe and conclude about Maynard--he's rather shallow and lacking in substance. And one notes he's SURROUNDED BY FEMALES as of his immediate family--which he admits--it's not surprising he takes on certain characteristics.
Like females, Maynard strives to be adept at socializing: he cultivates the friendly promotion of a more artistic-type (stylistically), word-smith and phraseologist, like Pat Grimm (ZionistWatch.Wordpress.ocm) and others, and thus builds up a kind of aura for himself as one who's prominent in some way, puffed-up by means of people he imagines are beholden to him.
Lately, the poor fool, Maynard, "bombed" rather ingloriously when/as he decided to prosecute accusation against mighty Apollonian to effect Apollonian conspired with big kikes of Google, etc. (see above)--Maynard had actually made vague such-like accusations before when he was on WordPress, but I didn't take it seriously, observing he tended to the womanly mindedness, considering it most expedient to go along with the fool--though I considered he was a "fool who tried"--as in trying to be patriotic.
Further, observe Maynard actually does take it seriously idea Apollonian should be "grateful" to the girly-man--this is no joke. I just decided the little bastard needed some serious "waking-up" as to real facts of reality.
Hence I say this latest incident HAS GENUINELY SERVED some substantial purposes, at least for me, and that is illustration for importance of "good-evil" fallacy/delusion/heresy--I'M MORE DETERMINED than ever to emphasize such hereticalist delusion as fundamental and emblematic of horrific degeneration of our present culture in "Decline of the West" by Oswald Spengler (see above expo).
Additionally, we "smoked-out" some real scum--like Greg Bacon (CareAndWashingOfTheBrain.blogspot.com), a genuinely butt-stupid moron, and that scummy little harpy, "Voir Dire," too--these are perfect examples of Pelagian hereticalists. And if Maynard was smart, he'd take note to seeing how he's too easily "puffed-up" by shits like the two aforementioned, esp. "Voir Dire," who may actually be working for the Jews, believe it or not, even if the whore herself doesn't quite realize it.
So what has been achieved?--mighty Apollonian triumphs again for his sheer analytic ability and prosecution of strictest logic. Maynard, if he's smart, will take his crushing defeat as a lesson learned--I'll smash him again, if he doesn't watch out. Note these younger types need to learn there's reason to respect experience of grizzled veterans like myself.
Remember the basic strength of mighty Apollonian: it is that incredibly strong grasp of basic theologic art, but at same time with such crushing, invincible sheer LOGIC too. Maynard was SO caught-up within his own puffed-up delusions of grandeur, by stupid females yet.
CONCLUSION: Overall lesson is Maynard should consider HONESTY is truly best policy, the very strength of Christian ideal of TRUTH VS. LIES and conspiracy, esp. Judaic. Thus I intend to continue to prosecute campaign against HERESY, and by this heroic means I'll surely become a saint--like St. Constantine the Great, St. Thomas Aquinas, and St. Augustine, perhaps. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
[Commentary by Apollonian, in below-copied text by "Nobody" (ChurchOfNobody.blogspot.com), capped, bracketed. A.]
nobody said...
"Ha ha ha ha, sorry to be laughing [GOOD TO SEE U'RE SO HAPPY, DEAR COMRADE "NOBODY.")
"...Phaedrus, but it seems it's your turn to be 'host' to the apple onion. [YES, AND WHY NOT?--ONE HONEST PATRIOT TO THE OTHER--AND IT'S SO EXCITING NOW TO HEAR AND READ UR OWN ADVICE AND OBSERVATIONS, U MAY BE SURE.]
"You know that quote of Kissinger's about anyone who's been hated for two thousand years must be doing something wrong? Welcome to Apollonian! Anyone who's been banned from as many blogs as him etc. etc... [WELL "NOBODY," PROBLEM HERE IS FALSE ANALOGY, BUT GOOD TRY, U LITTLE PHARISAIC BASTARD. OBVIOUS ANALYSIS IS WHY I'M BANNED--WOULD U SAY? IN UR CASE, U OBVIOUSLY CAN'T STAND SIMPLEST ANALYSIS AS U'RE THUS TOO EASILY EXPOSED AS PHARISAIC U REALLY ARE.]
"Will anyone give me odds on how long Phaedrus lasts? [THIS IS ACTUALLY WELL-TAKEN, BUT NOT, SURELY, IN WAY "NOBODY," THE PUKE, REALLY MEANS. FOR BLOGSPOT IS JEW PROPERTY, AND THEY'LL SHUT IT DOWN SOON ENOUGH AS PHAEDRUS INEXORABLY BECOMES MORE POPULAR, ESP. AMONG REAL PATRIOTS.]
"Phaedrus, I'll give you a month tops before you're forced to a new comments policy. All the best... [RIGHT "NOBODY," U LITTLE SHIT, BUT ONLY IF, SURELY, WE'RE HIT WITH THE USUAL BEVY OF JEW TROLLS ORGANIZED BY MOSSAD AND SPLC QUEERS--THEY FEAR US, NOT U, BRAINLESS IDIOT.]
"PS Don't worry about being put on Ap's shit-list. Me, I wear it as a badge of honour." [YES "NOBODY," BUT U FLATTER URSELF A BIT MUCH--THOUGH I CAN'T THINK OF A MORE PERFECT EXAMPLE OF A PHARISAIC, WITHOUT A DOUBT--U TAKE THE CAKE, BRAINLESS MORON.]
September 4, 2008 6:59 PM
Dear Curt, when you start your new blog please use blogger dot com as word press dot com is still blocked in China where I live.
Best Regards,
Sherwood Smith
This was very rude I must say. Keep some level of decency atleast.
if the entire network were to be shut down tomorrow, bloggers like Curt have ALREADY done their job, for they have set the fuse ablaze...
Now these "good" Jews actually have similar interests with normal human beings--like white folks.
Hats off to the author. You have done a tremendous work. Keep it up.
We have to continue to work towards reaching that critical point by getting this information out by any conceivable means we can.We have to do it at any cost!
great work . a very good message for curt . I appreciate it .
Liberalism that's been thrust upon us, against the wishes of the majority, for so many decades now.
Nice try from Curt Maynard but bloggers don`t listen it
Your story is amazing sir. I think im going to take a day off and stay in the house reading your entire blog.
The one consistency common with all apollonian essays was that he was generally the only one to comment on them.
I dont really understand your post here but i am confident that your future articles will enlighten me.
Post a Comment