Saturday, August 30, 2008

Is 'Evil' a Real Force in the World?

.
A few weeks ago, Apollonian, one of the more recent respondents here on World Peace, took issue with Phaedrus over the concept of Evil. Phaedrus has made frequent references to "evil deeds" and "evil people" and so forth, and this respondent (who appears to be pretty well-read in philosophy) objected vehemently and repeatedly to this blogger's frequent use of terms such as "good" and "evil" and so on and tried to win this writer over to his point of view, which is essentially that there is no such thing. Getting bogged down in a dry, academic discussion on what is essentially a matter of personal belief between myself and any respondent would not exactly excite and animate World Peace's readership, so initially it was decided to simply ignore the matter. However, on second thoughts, I have conceived a way in which these matters CAN be addressed in a way which is meaningful to readers and also explains why my stated position on the existence of Evil as a real and highly dangerous force in our lives will not be changing one iota. Here goes....

Phaedrus has always been a great believer in the power of allegory in getting complex concepts more clearly across. It's not necessary in this essay to resort to a full-blown allegory; a simple parable will more than adequately show where I'm coming from on this issue. Apollonian will no doubt leap on what follows and dissect it in extreme detail in the comments section if he so choses and he is free to do so. But I would like to remind him that in so doing, he is not, in any way whatsoever, going to advance the cause in which we are all united, but rather divert attention from it to the benefit of those who would prefer we totally avoid any direct examination of their odious behavior. I refer here in particular to the Jews, of course. In rebutting Apollonian's arguments by way of a parable in essay form rather than by simply following up his comments, we waste no time and effort in letting the Jews off the hook by arguing the matter out in the small print where few people would take notice.

Imagine if you will, a man clinging to a rocky precipice by his fingernails. He has stumbled off a mountain path and is hanging on for dear life. Certain death follows should he lose his fragile grip. A short time later, a group of three walkers pass by the spot: a Christian, a Muslim and a Buddhist. He calls out to them for help. They rush over to him and without any thought for their own safety, pull him back onto the path. Much relieved, he asks them how he can ever thank them. They laugh and tell him no reward is necessary and that any decent person would do the same. The situation is resolved with good feeling all-round. Now rewind this scenario to the beginning and imagine the man clinging once again to the edge of the precipice. This time, a group of Negroes approach. The man calls out to them for assistance, but they just laugh at him, make a few racial slurs and walk by. A moment later, one of them turns back towards the man. Could this be a sudden change of heart? Sadly not, the Negro has spotted the man is wearing a gold watch. Said black person removes the watch and gleefully returns to his friends to show them the spoils.


Rewind this same scenario for the final time. On this occasion, a Jew walks past. The man calls over to him for assistance as with the other passers-by. The Jew walks over, listens to the man's appeals, then thoughtfully strokes his beard. "Aren't you going to help me?" pleads the man in desperation. The Jew looks up and down the path. There's no one else in sight. He reaches down and removes the man's gold watch, just as the Negro did. "OK, OK!" cries the man, "Keep the watch. It's yours. Just help me up!" The Jew quietly slips the watch into his pocket and, taking one more look about him to ensure he remains unobserved, proceeds to stamp on the man's fingertips, forcing him to relinquish his grip and fall to his death.

So in the forgoing example, we have three very different types of behavior exhibited. The first people rescued the man without a second's thought and sought no reward for rendering their assistance. The Negroes, on the other hand, were callously indifferent to the man's plight and robbed him of his watch, leaving him still clinging precariously to the ledge. Finally, the Jew passed by and robbed the man of his watch AND needlessly sent him plunging to his certain death. Apollonian (in accordance with the teachings of Nietzsche and others) conjectures that none of these behaviors evidence either goodness OR evil on the part of the passers-by. This is a standpoint which Phaedrus finds impossible to reconcile with reality. It goes to the core of the problems we face today. Apollonian posits the view that (and I'm sure he'll correct me if I misunderstand him - and probably even if I don't) that there is no such thing as Evil and that what we commonly TAKE to be Evil is simply rather "utter selfishness" on the part of some individuals. They satisfy their needs totally without empathy for others and without the slightest prick of conscience.

To some extent, this may be true. But it is an inchoate picture which seems to have been dreamed up only by those who have been blessed to have had no personal experience of REAL Evil in their lives. They've never seen it up-close-and-personal, so-to-speak. What these people are REALLY describing is PSYCHOPATHIC behavior, which CAN be Evil, but often isn't. There's a key difference that I shall make clear here in this essay, after which I plan to make no further attempt to justify my beliefs to anyone who has no idea of my background, my age, nor how many books I have read, nor of what quality they were. Here's that key difference illustrated by reference to the above parable we examined: The Christian, the Muslim and the Buddhist acted altruistically. They put themselves out to save someone and sought no reward for doing so. Anyone with a lick of common sense is going to say they exhibited "goodness" in so doing. There's very little to argue about here with this first group of people; the REAL essence of the question can only be resolved by examining the behavior of the other two parties: the Negroes and the Jew.

The Negroes exhibited classic psychopathic behavior. They put themselves out not one iota to assist a man in trouble; all they did was steal his watch. Here we have selfish desires satiated with no regard or empathy for the victim. Classic Negro behavior from what we see all the time in the more truthful elements of the news media. But is it actually Evil? In Phaedrus' view, no, it isn't. It's merely self-centered indifference to the suffering of others and a bit of advantage-taking thrown in. Now consider the Jew's response. He failed to assist the man, he stole the man's watch AND he needlessly killed him. He COULD have simply walked away with the watch like the Negroes, but instead, he went just that bit further,when there was NO need, to see the man plunge to his death. This is the whole point of the parable where a form of behavior extends beyond pure indifferent self-enrichment and strays into the realm of Evil. It wasn't NECESSARY to send this man plummeting to his death. The Jew had what he wanted - like the Negro - and could have left it like that. Instead, he felt the inclination to stray into needless, wanton cruelty for no reason but his own sick enjoyment - and THIS is the point where Evil arises and we can see it all around us in the way Jews behave towards others, wherever they may be in the world, there is always this sick element of "gratuitous nastiness" that so typically characterizes their behavior as a race.

Now Phaedrus would be the first to admit that there are plenty of people who consider themselves 'religious' who are anything BUT pious. And there are equally Jews who do NOT exhibit this trait. Furthermore, there ARE honest and civilized black people. But in every case, they are A-typical of their race or creed and do not represent the majority. Patrick Grimm reminded us of the importance of stereotypes; the instilled wisdom of generations which we fail to call upon at our peril when forced to deal with foreigners. Jews and their NWO buddies are at the forefront of rubbishing stereotypes and trying to make stereotyping people a 'thought crime.' Given the primordial nature of the Jews, the impetus behind this piece of social engineering should come as no surprise to us! Who but the Jews and the Negroes would have more to gain from having their essential core natures effaced from the awareness of others?

So there you have it: my justification for using the terms "good" and "evil" and my resolution to CONTINUE to do so for as long as Evil remains such a pervasive force behind Western nations' internal and external policy development!

17 comments:

apollonian said...

Phaedrus Well And Valiantly Approaches "Good-Evil" Issue For Instruction, Even If In Failure
(Apollonian, 30 Aug 08)

First, I'd like to assure good comrade Phaedrus though I absolutely disagree and continue to disagree w. him (on issue of "good-evil"), he's nothing less than magnificent white man for facing up to the issue--WHICH MUST BE DONE (see below reasoning)--and then further elucidating his position as he does so well and informatively.

Phaedrus then well demonstrates and confirms his outstanding merit as essayist and polemicist for his careful reasoning submitted herewith, above--though again, I respectfully disagree.

So one can't be surprised as so many fans and readers are won over by comrade Phaedrus--even if they too, like myself, so vehemently disagree w. him on "good-evil" Pelagian heresy and necessarily implicit fallacy of perfectly free (hence) God-like human will which is obviously (I submit) hubristic and defective.

Indeed, I was philosophy major and am keen student and scholar thereof, but Phaedrus, as he's so honest, is quite equal for necessary concepts and reasoning tasks. "Good-evil" fallacy/delusion is not rocket-science, and can, should, and must be discussed in realistic fashion by all comrades, citizens, and patriots.

Phaedrus in his natural honesty wonders why "good-evil" issue is so essential, and he absolutely deserves substantial answer, this exposition then going to the very crux of things for white and Western survival and resurgence against "Decline of the West," by Oswald Spengler.

For white, Western, and Christian people absolutely require TRUTH against Judaic and Judeo-conspiratorial (see TheNewAmerican.com for expo/ref. on CFR-Bilderberg conspiracy) lies and mass-murder we're presently confronted with. Again I emphasize necessary primary and fundamental issue is truth vs. lies, as in Christian New Testament (NT), esp. Gosp. JOHN, NOT the childish "good vs. evil," which is derivative/dependent at best/most.

For observe Truth ONLY makes sense given objective, Aristotelian reality--WHICH IS DENIED by subjectivism of Jews and specifically their Talmud (see RevisionistHistory.org, TruthTellers.org, and Come-and-hear.com for best Talmudic expo).

Observe then typical, habitual manner in which truth, and especially rule-of-law, is denied and ignored is almost ALWAYS done in name of Pharisaism-moralism and/or "good-evil." "Good" and virtue are elevated above truth itself since Immanuel Kant, Kant inspired by J.J. Rousseau. Note philosopher, Plato, had elevated "good" as co-equal w. truth and beauty.

And never forget doctrine of Jew "neo-con" preceptor, Leo Strauss (see TheNewAmerican.com for expo/ref.), who emphasizes the "noble lie," affirming Plato and Kant.

But obvious fact is "good" is subjective, and can (and should) only be understood according to necessary prior CRITERION provided by truth and objective reality--this is what comrade Phaedrus overlooks continually.

Indeed, comrade Phaedrus tacitly confirms this subordinate, dependent status of "good" as he presents his excellent and well-written, though still defective--which I'll explain--examples given (see again his blog-text, above). For note I DON'T DISAGREE WITH EVERYTHING good comrade Phaedrus pt.s out, Phaedrus making some un-deniably good (meaning excellent, pertinent, and substantial sense) and cogent pt.s, never doubt I willingly acknowledge.

Thus Phaedrus's examples given suffer basically fm oversights, slight, but still significant which he should note and address.

For never doubt in truth and honesty humans are necessarily self-interested, being by definition, creatures of will (source of "original-sin" concept for Christians). Thus it's perfectly possible and feasible it's in interests of original Christian, Buddhist, and Musselman to aid and assist poor, unfortunate man clinging by finger-tips.

But note it's also possible IT ISN'T IN INTERESTS, even of these three aforementioned, to save the unfortunate person--it's quite possible the three might so judge it not to be in such interests. "Good" has nothing necessarily to do with the situation, and note Phaedrus still doesn't specifically define good, the presumption being "good" has something to do with mindless preservation of life, even if there's no purpose served otherwise--for it still would beg the obvious question as to why.

Again, "Good" necessarily requires critierion which Phaedrus overlooks and fails to substantiate.

And I'd do exact same thing to the Jew as Phaedrus described Jew did, were positions reversed, and I'd account it as necessary to preservation of white and human race to so kill such Jew, thus accounting such ruthless action of mine to be "good," this "good" then obviously subjective and dependent upon prior premise, namely, what is good for white and human race.

Niggers and Jew described by Phaedrus are merely honest and acting consistent w. their premises, so far as we can tell; "good-evil" has nothing necessarily to do with it, as neither does psycho-pathology.

So we see Phaedrus's examples are defective and require more for detail regarding motivation. Jews are psychopaths by their Talmudic religion; they're convinced this is best for them--and this isn't either "good" or "bad," just simply the way they are, that's all.

For Jews are a parasite affliction, no less than disease of Typhus--they all serve to keep down excessive population of gentiles and humanity--THAT'S ALL. Typhus doesn't imagine it's "evil"--neither do Jews.

So I only hope good comrade Phaedrus can begin to see my pt. "good-evil" is (a) subjective, in first place. (b) But further, I additionally demand comrade Phaedrus SEE HOW IMPORTANT this issue really is, as such "good-evil" delusion/fallacy/heresy is usual, typical manner people delude and bamboozle themselves out of and against truth which is what gentiles and white folk need so much in order to survive here on earth.

CONCLUSION: Thanks again to Phaedrus for his excellent efforts and attention, as this dialectic is most useful and instructive for all readers, fans, patriots, citizens, and soldiers who consider upon our subject of racial/cultural struggle. Thus HONESTY of Phaedrus is what so much and so well serves truth, hence REAL, essential interests and info of our dear white people. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

dizzyfatplonka said...

The Jew would obviously claim the man clinging to a rocky precipice by his fingernails was evil and therefore deserved his fait.

Through the Jew having control of the mass media most people would accept this and probably piss on the poor fellows grave so we must tread carefully with the concept of good and evil as it is open to interpritation.

Lets not forget also that had the man lived but only lost his watch to the negro the jew who controls the media would tell us how the negro deserved the watch for all the years of slavery.

Because remember in the world of good and evil the white man is lumbered with the evil tag.

Greg Bacon said...

There's no such thing as "Evil?"

Tell that to the over one million Iraqi's we've murdered ever since Junior started talking about the voices in his head.
Voices that told him to "smite" Saddam and boy, did we smite him and the rest of Iraq.

Tell that to the over 4,100 American kids, murdered by Junior, in order to fulfill his fantasy.

Just be sure that when you go tell these people, you shout loud, since your voice will have to penetrate six feet of earth... Unless their body was vaporized by one of Junior's Hellfire missiles.

There's no "Evil?"

That sounds like some blathering one might read on a Ph.D thesis somebody submitted in order to get their doctorate in Philosophy.

apollonian said...

Greg Bacon Over-Reaches--For What Is Real Pt., Use Of "Good-Evil" Prop.?
(Apollonian, 31 Aug 08)

Thanks Greg, but note u really only verify my argument which demands CRITERION for meaning to "good-evil."

And yes, there are now surely over a million dead Iraqis due directly to willful slaughter of these poor souls by Judeo-conspirators (see TheNewAmerican.com for expo/ref. on CFR-Bilderberg conspiracy) and especially Jew "neo-cons."

And I absolutely condemn this horrific slaughter--but note foremost reason is Musselmen now have most visceral reason for HATING Christian Americans who have so grossly lent themselves to being assassins and mercenaries for neo-con masterminds.

So u can be sarcastic and sardonic all u pls; fact remains "good-evil" is essentially meaningless and subjective, and requires CRITERION for meaning, for which objective, absolute criterion no one has ever succeeded in entire history of philosophy, period.

CONCLUSION: Greg, u OVER-REACH--for it's sufficient to simply pt. out how against interests such horrific slaughter of Iraqis is for USA. "Good-evil" is mere emotional incitement for children, a tool of Jew mass-media. Who's interests then are u really serving as u pretend to encouraging expediency of such "good-evil" prop.? Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

Anonymous said...

Phaedrus, you have fallen for it again. I can't believe someone with your undoubted perceptivity can't see it when it happens to *you* yourself! Apolloninan - whatever he wants to call himself - is an obvious Jew-stooge who delights in distracting you from your vital task with his absurd ramblings. Don't pay him any more mind!

Greg Bacon said...

If there is no such thing as "Evil," Apollonian, then there is no such thing as a "Synagogue of Satan" and no such thing as the Jewish Caballists running the world as they see fit.

Yes, I can see now that the Zionist designs on world domination isn't evil, it's just some Talmudists getting a little too carried away in the numbers of people they've butchered in their quest, what cut-ups they are!!

Since there is no such thing as "Evil," then the Jews running the US and using her to fight wars for land and wealth is just a fable, since to say that would imply evil acts and you've proved that evil doesn't exist.

And Israel's ethnic cleansing campaign against Palestinians isn't evil, those poor Israeli's are just misunderstood, that's all.

And serial killers like Dalhmer and Ted Bundy weren't "evil," they were some good ol' boys who got a little too frisky.

Since there is no evil, just think of all of the money we can save by emptying out all of the prisons in the world and turning those poor, misunderstood souls back into society.

This whole thing of whether or not you believe evil exists comes down to whether or not you believe evil does exist and I believe it does and no amount of flowery exhortations will convince me otherwise.

curt maynard said...

apollonian is almost certainly a Jew and/or agent provacateur, he constantly touts the alleged virtues of known government informants, Bill White and Hal Turner.

Be careful Phaedrus, apollonian often inserts threats within the text of his unreadable essays and comments, which then enables him to report them [his own commentary] to google who can then use that as an excuse to ban/suppress the blog thay were posted on.

I refused to post many of his essays in the past for this very reason, and told him so. Being that reading his commentary is so painful, i.e. the guy can't put a sentence together to save his fucking life, many if not most people that approve and post his commentary aren't likely to read through it and thus won't find the threats he often inserts in the text.

apollonian is a charlatan - don't be fooled by him. Nothing he writes will ever be seen again on my blogs. Once you've stopped posting his crap, he'll be once again relegated back to his well deserved obscurity at the Jew owned and operated newnationnews.

curt maynard said...

Phaedrus,

I just had to show you real quick what a degenerate sycophant this pig apollonian is.

He wrote in an above comment:

"apollonian said...
Phaedrus Well And Valiantly Approaches "Good-Evil" Issue For Instruction, Even If In Failure
(Apollonian, 30 Aug 08)"

apollonian will literally lick your asshole if you post his crap - he'll prostrate himself like a lil bitch if you pay any attention to his ignorant rambling - but once you've chosen to ignore and/or ban his commentary and POV he'll attack you just like one would expect an immoral Jew to do.

Just so you know Phaedrus, below are some comments apollonian submitted to me where his sycophancy is blatantly apparenmt for all to see.

THIS is how he baits you into posting his commentary- an old Jew trick really, butter you up in order to "set you up." Bear in mind how the deviant kisses my ass and then consider what the piece of shit has recentl;y said about me. Phaedrus, no matter how you approach it, you're next.

1. Curt Maynard Foremost Editor, Genuine Leader Of Real Patriot Movement, Indubitably

(Apollonian, 12 Jul 08)

Indeed, comrade Phaedrus (see WorldPeace-Phaedrus, "Read the Irrepressible...," 12 Jul 08), and in all seriousness, Curt Maynard (CurtMaynardsBlog.blogspot.com) is surely one of very topmost blogsters and general internet info sources for one unquestionable and verifiable reason: literateness and scholarship (as the two go together), but MOST especially that scholarly quality which isn't easily duplicated.


2. apollonian said...
[Thanks much good comrade editor Curt. Note Les Visible followed his strong essay, "9/11... The Truth...," 24 Jun, with a real stinker (as I note below), "Jacque Fresco...," 27 Jun, which then I criticised in below-copied entry--FOR WHICH THEN VISIBLE BANNED ME (see further below dialecticals). I trust my essays/entries will speak well enough for themselves. A.]

3. (Apollonian, 5 Jun 08)

I'm great fan of mighty birdman [No he isn't - he;'s attacked the birdman too] (theBirdman.org), visiting his site almost daily. I know of J. Quick (see JeffreyQuick.wordpress.com, "I Heard a little birdy...," 22 Apr 08)--fm the mighty birdman, as matter of fact--and Quick is full of smarm and smug, a real Pharisee, indubitably, who simply enjoys, quite obsessively, I observe, pontifficating, like typical Pharisee, to prove how "moral" he is, such an inferiority complex he has, obviously. For who needs to be "good" who doesn't begin w. that inferiority complex in first place?


4. CONCLUSION: Maynard is also most excellent practical illustrator and photo-editor too. So when honest and serious evaluation is made for quality in all the various departments for public information, Curt Maynard has to come out very near topmost, if not very top itself. Thus Maynard's scholarship--which is absolutely essential for quality of info--is so well balanced for general readability and public interest for knowledge. Thank goodness for such practical heroes like Curt Maynard. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

etc... etc....

CONCXLUSION - apollonian is an ingrate piece of shit and probable Jew based on his behavior and the fact that he supports two known informants, Bill White and Hal Turner, AND based upon the fact that he surreptitiously inserts threats within the text of his comments and essays.

apollonian said...

[commentary by Apollonian, in below text of Bacon's, capped, bracketed. A.]



Greg Bacon said...
"If there is no such thing as "Evil," Apollonian, then there is no such thing as a "Synagogue of Satan" and no such thing as the Jewish Caballists running the world as they see fit. [GREG, THIS IS FALLACY OF "NON-SEQUITUR"--U NEED FIRST A SOLID DEFINITION OF "EVIL."]

"Yes, I can see now that the Zionist designs on world domination isn't evil, it's just some Talmudists getting a little too carried away in the numbers of people they've butchered in their quest, what cut-ups they are!! [GREG, IT'S NOT JUST "ZIONISTS"--IT'S ALL TALMUDISTS, HENCE ALL JEWS, IPSO FACTO, PURE AND SIMPLE. AND THESE TALMUDISTS ARE PSYCHOPATHS; "EVIL" (FOR CHILDREN) HAS NOTHING NECESSARILY TO DO WITH IT. TALMUDISM MUST BE EXTERMINATED REGARDLESS OF WHETHER IT'S "EVIL," AS TALMUDISM IS ANTI-GENTILE. SEE RevisionistHistory.org, TruthTellers.org, and Come-and-hear.com FOR BEST EXPO/REF. ON TALMUD.]

"Since there is no such thing as "Evil," then the Jews running the US and using her to fight wars for land and wealth is just a fable,... [THIS IS JUST ANOTHER RATHER MINDLESS NON-SEQUITUR--FOR I AGREE JEWS AND JUDEO-CONSPIRATORS (SEE TheNewAmerican.com FOR EXPO/REF. ON CFR-BILDERBERG CONSPIRACY) HAVE HIJACKED USA JUST AS U INDICATE--BUT WHAT DOES "EVIL" HAVE TO DO WITH IT? AMERICANS ARE JUST STUPID SUCKERS, AND U MAY BE SURE JEWS CONSIDER GENTILES "EVIL."]

"...since to say that would imply evil acts and you've proved that evil doesn't exist. [I'VE ONLY EMPHASIZED "EVIL" HAS NO CLEAR, OBJECTIVE MEANING AND IS MERE EMOTIONAL EPITHET FOR CHILDREN, AGAIN.]

"And Israel's ethnic cleansing campaign against Palestinians isn't evil, those poor Israeli's are just misunderstood, that's all. [JEWS ARE JUST DOING WHAT THEY THINK THEY CAN GET AWAY WITH--THEY'RE MURDERING, SCUMMY PSYCHOPATHS WITHOUT A DOUBT. "EVIL" DOESN'T ADD ANYTHING OR SAY ANYTHING MEANINGFUL. THOUGH. IN FACT, ALL IT DOES IS PROMOTE THE SAME PSYCHOPATHIC SELF-RIGHTEOUSNESS JEWS SUFFER.]

"And serial killers like Dalhmer and Ted Bundy weren't "evil," they were some good ol' boys who got a little too frisky. [MORE NON-SEQUITURS PRETENDING TO SARCASM; U NEED TO PRESENT A SOLID DEFINITION THAT STANDS UP INSTEAD OF CONTINUING W. U OBSESSION W. "EVIL." U'RE MERELY EXERCISING QUITE MINDLESS SELF-RIGHTEOUSNESS OF UR OWN.]

"Since there is no evil, just think of all of the money we can save by emptying out all of the prisons in the world and turning those poor, misunderstood souls back into society. [THIS IS NEATEST NON-SEQUITUR OF ALL, SO FAR, AND A DELIBERATE MIS-REPRESENTATION. CRIMINALS NEED INCARCERATION IN ACCORD W. JUSTICE AND LAW, ETC., THIS FOR THE INTERESTS OF SOCIETY; "EVIL" IS CHILD'S INDULGENCE WHICH IS IRRELEVANT.]

"This whole thing of whether or not you believe evil exists comes down to whether or not you believe evil does exist and I believe it does and no amount of flowery exhortations will convince me otherwise." [WHY DIDN'T U SAY SO IN FIRST PLACE, RATHER THAN MAKING W. ALL UR ABSURDITIES ABOVE? THUS U ADMIT TO UR OWN PHARISAISTIC SELF-RIGHTEOUSNESS AND SUBJECTIVISM, AND ADMIT U'RE NO ESSENTIALLY DIFFERENT FM JEWS WE PATRIOTS ARE FIGHTING.]

September 1, 2008 5:11 AM

apollonian said...

Maynard, In Effeminate Fluster, Posts On Wrong Blog
(Apollonian, 2 Sep 08)

I note the effeminate Curt Maynard, as in his above-posted entries, seems to have forgotten this particular blog is on topic of "evil," and appropriate blog for his taunts is one just preceding this.

So I direct all patriot fans to go to just preceding blog to catch-up on my ripostes to Maynard's petty gibes, platitudes, and accusations in all his typical effeminate pique. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

curt maynard said...

Ah fuck you and your Jewish whore of a mothers womb apollonian.

Greg Bacon said...

Apollonian or whoever the hell you are, after reading Curt Maynard's reply, your stealth approach to blogging is now coming into view.

You've made several replies to my blog, replies which were filled with suggestions and incitements to violence.

Which i did not repy directly to, since it seemed, well strange.

No longer.

You skulk around blogs, like some psychotic troll, baiting people in the hopes they'll agree with your delusional ramblings and if they do, you go scurrying to your masters at Zhid Central and squeal like the little piggie you are and get people kicked off sites like Blogger.

It's all becoming rather apparent now.

So bugger off Apollininan or whatever you are.

One thing I know you're not and that's the second coming of Nietzsche, who's philosophy you ripoff and present as your own.

Is that why you never finished your Ph.D thesis?

The review board at the university discovered your plagiarisms?

BTW, where is YOUR blog, Apollinian? Do you have one and is it written in English or Hebrew?

Or is it just easier to suck the lifeblood out of other blogs?

apollonian said...

[Commentary by Apollonian in below text by Bacon, capped, bracketed. A.]



Greg Bacon said...
"Apollonian or whoever the hell you are, [U GOT IT, PUNK-BRAINS, THAT'S MY MONIKER ALL RIGHT; I TRUST U'RE ABLE TO READ ENGLISH, STUPID PUKE.]

"...after reading Curt Maynard's reply, your stealth approach to blogging is now coming into view. [OH THIS SHOULD BE SOOOOO INTERESTING EXPO BY A SHIT-FOR-BRAINS MORON. TELL US ALL ABOUT IT, DO.]

"You've made several replies to my blog, replies which were filled with suggestions and incitements to violence. [SO WHAT?--U STUPID PUNK. PERHAPS U MIGHT BE MORE CLEAR IF U PROVIDED EXAMPLES FOR UR IDIOT ASSERTIONS, BRAINLESS MORON.]

"Which i did not repy directly to, since it seemed, well strange. [RIGHT, U DUMBASS PIECE-OF-SHIT; LOTS OF THINGS ARE "STRANGE" AND MYSTERIOUS TO IGNORANT FILTH LIKE URSELF, EH?]

No longer. [OH RIGHTO, PUNK.]

"You skulk around blogs, [NO, STUPID BRAINLESS SCUM: I REPLY QUITE STRAIGHT-FORWARDLY, I'D SAY. TELL ME, ARE THESE REPLIES OF MINE HERE STRAIGHT-FORWARD ENOUGH FOR A SHIT LIKE U? U'RE OBVIOUSLY AN IDIOTIC, PATHETIC, IGNORANT PUKE--HOW ABOUT THAT?--IS THAT STRAIGHT-FORWARD ENOUGH FOR U?--PIECE-OF-SHIT SCUM.]

"...like some psychotic troll, [RIGHT, DUMBASS PUKE. IF U DON'T LIKE MY REPLIES/POSTS THEN ENABLE UR "COMMENT MODERATION," U BRAINLESS FILTH.]

"...baiting people [INDEED, I MUST ADMIT I DO OFTEN ENJOY "BAITING" SHIT LIKE U--BUT I PREFER BEING MOST STRAIGHT-FORWARD ABOUT IT, LIKE A WHITE-MAN, U STINKING, FETID SCUM.]

"...in the hopes they'll agree with your delusional ramblings [LIKE WHAT "DELUSIONAL RAMBLINGS"?--SHIT-FOR-BRAINS, GIVE AN EXAMPLE.]

"...and if they do, you go scurrying to your masters at Zhid Central [NO U COWARDLY, SCUMMY, PUKE, AND NOTE I FORTHRIGHTLY CONDEMN ALL JEWS--ALL TALMUDISTS, PERIOD. U, U COWARDLY SCUM, I NOTICE SEEM TO PRETEND THERE ARE "GOOD" JEWS, LIKE THERE ARE GOOD PSYCHOPATHS, EH?--U CRAVEN LITTLE SLIME.]

"...and squeal like the little piggie you are and get people kicked off sites like Blogger. [AND HOW DO U KNOW THIS?--U AMAZING, GULLIBLE, ABSOLUTE, COMPLETE FOOL. DO U BEGIN TO HAVE EVEN THE SLIGHTEST PROOF FOR ANY OF THIS IDIOCY, U IGNORANT LITTLE SON-OF-A-BITCH?]

"It's all becoming rather apparent now. [RIGHT, ESPECIALLY FOR A BRAINLESS, PSYCHO, LITTLE PUKE LIKE URSELF, I'M SURE.]

"So bugger off Apollininan or whatever you are. [RIGHT PUNK-BRAINS WHO CAN'T EVEN SPELL, IGNORANT MORON.]

"One thing I know you're not and that's the second coming of Nietzsche, who's philosophy you ripoff and present as your own. [I'M RATHER CHRISTIAN, ARISTOTELIAN, IGNORANT, BRAINLESS SCUM; GREG, I'M AMAZED U CAN EVEN SPELL THE NAME, PATHETIC MORON. I'VE NEVER QUOTED OR INVOKED NIETZSCHE, AND IT'S SHIT-FOR-BRAINS LIKE U WHO CAME UP WITH THE NAME IN THE FIRST PLACE, STUPID-ASS. CITE THE PARTICULAR BLOG OF UR OWN OR FM ANYWHERE U IMAGINE I EVER USED OR INVOKED THE NAME, OR PHILOSOPHY U UTTERLY, TOTALLY, GROSS IMBECILE.]

"Is that why you never finished your Ph.D thesis? [RIGHT, BRAINLESS FOOL.]

"The review board at the university discovered your plagiarisms? [OH GOOD ONE, MORON.]

"BTW, where is YOUR blog, Apollinian? [U SHOULD LEARN TO SPELL BETTER, SHIT-FOR-BRAINS. WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES HAVING A BLOG MAKE?--STUPID ASS.]

Do you have one and is it written in English or Hebrew? [U'RE JUST A BABBLING MORON, FILLED W. SELF-RIGHTEOUSNESS, STUPID PIECE-OF-SHIT.]

Or is it just easier to suck the lifeblood out of other blogs? [DUMB-ASS, U'RE JUST PLAYING THE JEWS' GAME, BRAINLESS MORON. PUNK, U SHOULD THINK BEFORE U SPEAK--OR IN THIS CASE, WRITE. U MAKE NO SENSE, POOR FOOL.]

September 2, 2008 1:30 PM

* * * * *


Greg Bacon, Ignorant Fool, Suckered By Maynard Who Must Be Cackling Happily
(Apollonian 2 Sep 08)

I was pretty amazed by latest, above, response/entry by doofus/dumbass Greg Bacon, the poor, brainless bastard who now, evidently, has been affected by babblings of Curt Maynard who imagines sooooo subtle conspiracy on part of Apollonian--it's funny, yet revealing too. But now I do begin to see what these little morons imagine they're talking about.

These pea-brained fools actually think top Jews at google would play stupid games regarding "threats," first mentioned by Maynard (but which I didn't take seriously) which Maynard imagines I smuggled into stuff later published by shit-for-brains--in order to then expose to Jews at Google, "Blogger," or whatever.

But these illiterate pukes don't seem to understand "threats" can be vague and general--as all gentiles are "threats" to Jews, and Christians are "threats" to queers. But some specific "threats" are defined by law to be actionable.

Finally now, it becomes more clear as to what these pathetic goobers were ever talking about--"threats," indeed.

I used to be Legal Assistant major (21 credit hrs) at a "Community College" (a two-year institution) where I learned about legally actionable "threats." But these kind of legally actionable "threats" have to be very specific as to what (a) they demand of a specific person, upon then (b) a specific threatened adverse action--NONE OF WHICH I've even begun to formulate, ever, anywhere, to anyone.

Finally it becomes most clear to me what these abysmally ignorant, brainless punks were ever talking about in the first place. But it's good we now see how these little bastards think with their pea-sized little brains.

And Greg Bacon, shit-for-brains moron, utterly witless fool, thinks anyone who challenges "good-evil" Pelagian heresy (look that up, ignorant scum) is "Nietszchean"--woooooooo.

It unfortunately doesn't occur to these morons (Maynard and Bacon) the top Jews wouldn't worry about specifics--they'd rather just delete the blogs upon the word of someone, an informant, they worked with--certainly not me, a confirmed anti-semite, as can easily be verified by my works collected at NewNation.org under "commentary."

But now we see better what truly inhibits patriot movement in general--like the sheer brainless stupidity of pathetic little bastards like Maynard and Bacon--ESPECIALLY SELF-RIGHTEOUSNESS borne of "moralism" and "good-evil" heresy/delusion/fallacy, which I'm evermore absolutely determined to stamp out most ruthlessly.

I swear to God, comrades, I'm 55 yrs old, but I'll be damned if I couldn't bash these two little scum-balls (aforementioned Maynard and Bacon), such utterly incompetent, empty-headed, simpletons.

But note again, it all (this controversy fed by Maynard the effeminate little bastard) does serve one purpose as it smokes out a self-righteous, Pharisaic piece-of-shit who can't define it, but insists nonetheless, there really is "good-evil," this putrescent slime, named Greg Bacon--get a serious load of the self-righteous bullshit he has the gall to post, above.

And I'll tell u folks what else: it shows how far patriots are fm solving this larger Jew problem we have--as white race is still too full of ignorant, just-plain-stupid shits, inferiors, and weaklings like Maynard and Bacon.

Before white race and Christians can successfully coalesce we MUST remove dumb-asses--like Bacon and Maynard, just plain ignorant scum who pretend like children, so self-righteous, to such "good-evil."

CONCLUSION: I trust comrade Phaedrus begins to see the problem regarding this "good-evil" conundrum. I'm more determined than ever, but I understand I must resist my own sort of "self-righteousness" for this Pharisaism-moralism issue. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

apollonian said...

[Below essay by me addresses Kenny's particular latest blog, but is also most appropriate here too. A.]



Key Historical Culmination Requires Jew-Expulsion, Along With Honesty
(Apollonian, 6 Sep 08)

Ken (see KennySideShow.blogspot.com, "Can't See...," 5 Sep 08): brilliant analysis, I say; note Christian New Testament (NT) and Gosp. JOHN rather confirm ur analysis, indicating battle is btwn TRUTH and Lies, esp. organized, conspiratorial Jew lies, hence fraud, and there's no greater, more powerful lie (fraud) than that COUNTERFEIT scam/conspiracy (see RealityZone.com for expo/ref.) of US Federal Reserve Bank (Fed) fraud, engine for Orwellian "perpetual war for perp. peace, etc., as presently in Iraq/Afgan.

But, again as u indicate, these are all details, "trees," obstructing "forest" fm our best political/cultural view. So what's "forest" or "enemy" we're looking for to examine?

I submit then that "forest" is historic/socio-biologic (see KevinMacDonald.net for socio-biology) CYCLE, as "Decline of the West," by Oswald Spengler--and what then we're looking for is CULMINATION for and to it all, and relevant theme(s)--as in thesis vs. anti-thesis (as of Hegel).

Thus observe formerly successful West has now been over-taken (in present "decline") by parasitic Jew disease-of-opportunity which has prosecuted former theme, still working, of (neo-) Pelagain heresy of "good-evil" Pharisaism-moralism fm time of Rousseau, Kant, and Eng. Utilitarianism--which then led to socialism of 19th cent., now to communist World-Gov. and "globalist" dicatatorship of United Nations (UN), etc.

Key to revival and resurgence of West is to solve specific problem of COUNTERFEITING scam and debt-slavery--which then leads to Jews--which then confronts us with racialistic problem(s), hence Pharisaism-moralism. For people/volk are transfixed and paralyzed by "moralism"-Pharisaism and Pelagian heresy, again.

And the only way to face and solve that more abstract, under-lying problem of Pharisaism-moralism, founded on "good-evil" delusion/fallacy/heresy, is to embrace precisely such honesty/truth as u, Ken, indicate/invoke. "Good-evil" must give way to NT Truth vs. lies.

Thus we need Jew-expulsion--and this will require HONESTY--there's no way around it.
Hence we must weather this up-coming and on-going storm as we approach CULMINATION of present Jew-dominated hist. CYCLE and Spenglerian "Decline...."

Jews (Talmudists--see RevisionistHistory.org, TruthTellers.org, and Come-and-hear.com for best Talmudic expo) then are "ENEMIES" because they're foremost and leading SUBJECTIVISTS upon which LIES, fraud, and conspiracy are built. Note Jews dominate organized crime (see Piper's "The New Jerusalem")--naturally, as they dominate topmost and controlling COUNTERFEIT conspiracy and continuing Criminal enterprise of Fed, most powerful practical single fraud of all.

Truth then is necessarily founded upon Western Aristotelian OBJECTIVITY--that's main philosophic anti-thesis to Jew subjectivism. Moralism-Pharisaism ("good-evil" heresy) is practical vehicle of subjectivism, rendering practical weapon of Fed COUNTERFEIT conspiracy/fraud, against which we presently struggle so pathetically, so desperately.

CONCLUSION: Thus socio-biologic/historical analysis is complete:
(a) Honesty and truth must overcome "good-evil" Pelagian heresy-fraud, in the abstract, and
(b) practically then, we must remove fraud, like the Fed, and rather install rule-of-law and hence debt-forgiveness, -repudiation, and -reform, and
(c) this then means Jew-expulsion, including all subjectivists and moralists among gentile collaborators. Such is necessary and desired completion/culmination/conclusion to Ken's excellent beginnings and premises for cultural/political ANALYSIS. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

Anonymous said...

Hello everyone! Who knows where to upload the film Avatar?
I even bought the film Avatar for a SMS to http://rsskino.ru/kinofilm/avatar.html , the link was, but download fails, the system will boot quite strange cocoa something.
Men, advise where to normal as quickly download film avatar?

Anonymous said...

I sell a boat-program which will help you to outwit auction and to win, initially the boat was created for the Scandinavian auction http://internet-aukcion.ru/ but now the program can work with similar auctions: gagen ru, vezetmne ru and with ten.
The program-boat stakes for you, i.e. for this purpose it is not necessary to sit constantly at the monitor. The boat can set time when it is necessary to stake, thus you as much as possible will lower expenses for rates, and as much as possible increase the chances of a victory.

The price of the program a boat for the Scandinavian auctions 20$

For the first 10 clients the price 15$

To all clients free updating and support.

Behind purchases I ask in icq: 588889590 Max.

Anonymous said...

[b]Set software LoveBots v 5.2[/b]

All for a mass mailing dating http://24lux.ru/

The script is written in php5

Features:

[i]registration, account activation
manual input captures, or the solution through antikapchu
filling data accounts:
- Gulf desired photo
- Инфы about yourself
- Diary
- Sexual preference[/i]

gulyalka on questionnaires spammer on lichku
- Randomization Posts: replacement of Russian letters in Latin analogues

optimized to work in a continuous loop
check-activation-filling-spam check ..

Updates and support free of charge.

Price per set 100 wmz

For the first 10 buyers price 70 wmz (your feedback on the software).

For shopping I ask in icq: 588889590 Max.

Scrin program:

[IMG]http://i066.radikal.ru/1002/9d/a7a68e8c96ee.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://i054.radikal.ru/1002/19/9db76967c0e5.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://s003.radikal.ru/i202/1002/24/20716e86512e.jpg[/IMG]

Flooding in the subject no! Write to feedback after the purchase.