The Deafening Silence...

.
Considering the ever-increasing surge of seriously disturbing accusations being leveled at our old friends, the Jews, it is rather curious indeed that their direct responses have been so remarkably distant and detached. Now please don't misunderstand Phaedrus here. We are all well aware that they're screaming "anti-Semitism!" at the top of their shrill little voices at those of us who seek to expose the truth about them and their very curious history. Nothing too surprising about that, of course. And not only that, but they're lobbying their pet governments in the West to introduce ever more ingeniously-contrived 'Hate Crime' laws to prevent legitimate researchers into the Jewish Problem from communicating their shocking findings to a wider audience. Speaking the truth is becoming increasingly criminalized. Anyone and everyone who speaks in negative terms about the Jews must be trussed-up and gagged by any means possible. Now this situation will strike a lot of people as downright unfair, not least for the reasons I set out below.

It's not odd at all, however, that the Jews would like to see all opposition to them crushed; that's only to be expected. But the really curious thing that is awakening suspicions among even some Liberals, is that these extremely broad, blanket responses are their SOLE weapon of choice against us. This limited technique of theirs works fine when the opposition against them is patchy, insufficiently motivated and improperly informed. They can push for censorship on the grounds that ignorant bigots are spreading lies about them just because they're a minority race of people who are simply misunderstood. And for a long, long time now, that's worked well for them. But lately, things are beginning to change. In the face of a absolute firestorm of lurid accusations swirling around about them on the internet, one thing is increasingly obvious by its total absence: any effort to directly engage their accusers face-to-face.

The Jews simply WILL NOT discuss specific allegations. Curiously, they choose not to defend themselves in the way you or I would INSIST upon, were it we that were on the receiving end of such endless diatribes. Now at first, this could be explained away (and it was) by simply claiming that the Jews didn`t want to 'provide a platform for racists.' In the early days (pre-internet) that excuse was widely accepted among the sheeple, who dutifully nodded their heads in unison with this noble sentiment. After all, back then it did seem a perfectly plausible reason. But as time has worn on and the accusations only grow louder and more insistent, to continue to remain silent increasingly seems to imply that they are unable to discuss these matters for the simple reason that they CANNOT counter them; the accusations (crazy sounding that they may be to the uninformed) are NOT baseless. They are grounded in vast stacks of high quality documentary evidence which when put before a Jew would leave him stultified with no answers and nowhere to run. Hence they resort to blanket denials which are not open to cross-examination, and increasing efforts to gag us through the courts.

We see a form of this vigorous avoidance of the pertinent questions every year on Holocau$t Memorial Day. Endlessly we re-live the terrible suffering of the poor Jews at the hands of those terrible Nazis, yet, bizarrely, no mention is EVER made of WHAT precisely it was about the Jews that made Hitler act towards them in such a draconian way. Have you ever heard an old German soldier recounting WHY he was told to seek out Jews? You haven't? Me neither. So we never get to the hear the OTHER side. And this outstanding omission becomes more and more obvious with every Holocau$t retrospective we're forced to endure. Things happen for a REASON, and the Holocau$t was no exception. It takes an enormous amount of pent-up anger and resentment on the part of one set of people to treat another set of people so harshly. What were the underlying resentments behind this antipathy? We are NEVER told. All we ARE told is that the Jews were victims of a terrible program to wipe them all out. No background for this is ever provided by the mainstream media. We are simply expected not to pick-up on this fundamental question.

If you or I were accused of half the things the Jews have been accused of (financing endless wars, corrupting society, sacrificing young children in quasi-satanic ceremonies, drinking the blood of those whom they are about to kill, poisoning the desert wells of their neighbors, murdering Palestinian children for the fun of it, stealing land that doesn't belong to them, being out for their own selfish gain regardless of the consequences to others, false flag attacks against the US to drag us into their never-ending foreign wars to name but a few of their many unique qualities) then I'm damn certain WE would DEMAND the right to confront our accusers so we could PROVE them liars and/or madmen for the entire world to see - and put and end to such 'vile rumors' for ever. It's becoming increasingly odd to folks that the Jews response is simply to try to put these allegations beyond debate by generating taboos around them. One would have thought (if they had nothing to hide) that they would have been only too happy after so many thousands of years of being reviled and persecuted, to avail themselves of a great opportunity to set the record straight. Yet they won't. And I believe now that ordinary people are beginning to wonder - why the deafening silence?

The Pusher at the School Gates

.
Allegories are useful tools for conveying to others the essence of complicated situations. The situation we're about to explore below is only made complicated by the powers that be in order to protect themselves and their overlords, the Jews. I've employed this method before, but only in passing and didn't really give it the attention it deserves. The time has come to flesh it out, because it goes to the very root of our problem in the West today and will no doubt assist those who have difficulties in understanding why we "anti-Semites" are so angry about the terrible things being done unceasingly by these vampires against decent people and their families. Some day if I get arrested for being a "hate-monger" I plan to use it in court to get my view over to the jury (if the jury system survives) in a readily comprehensible form. You might like to avail yourself of it, too, should the suppression of free speech in the West come to match or exceed that which we see in countries such as China or Burma.

Imagine, if you will, that you inhabit an apartment that overlooks a local school. Let's say you're retired and don't have too much to do all day, so you sit on the balcony just enjoying the sunshine and maybe reading a decent book. Every afternoon at the same time, the noisy chattering of the townsfolks' kids echoes over to you as they leave lessons for another day. You gaze across at them trooping home with a degree of paternalistic concern. You wonder what sort of a world they'll be inhabiting by the time you're no longer around. You sigh resignedly with the nostalgia of your own schooldays when life was so much simpler and the cultural environment infinitely more wholesome.

Another day rolls around and the chattering of the children once again assails your ears. You put down your book, having difficulty concentrating against the backdrop of this customary disturbance, and turn your gaze over to the school gates, once again fondly musing on your own innocent, long-gone school days. But something's different on this day. There's a somewhat older guy just a few yards down from the gate the children are leaving by and calling them on over to him. Some hang out with this stranger a while, others just drift on by. You think little of it. Maybe it's just a former teacher stopping by to say hello to some of his old charges. The noise diminishes in time and you get back into your book.

Some days later and you're on your balcony again. You hear the laughter and general cheeriness of the kids coming out after the completion of another school day. Oh, it's that time of the afternoon again, so you put down your book and watch the kids leave. They're in high spirits as ever. After all it's a good school in a good area and you rarely hear of any bullying or similar trouble. The scene is really quite idyllic. You're sitting there with your feet up, enjoying the sun, and watching small town life go past before your eyes. But then you notice the same, slightly older guy again, maybe 10 feet from the gate. And again he's calling some of the kids over and again some do, whilst others appear oblivious.

You're rather more suspicious this time. He doesn't look like a sex offender - whatever 'they' look like - and isn't acting like some pervert might, either. All the same, though, it's a little odd. Maybe he's one of the kid's big brothers between jobs and just likes to collect his little brother from classes and chew the rag with a few of the lad's pals. Yeah, that's probably all it is. You have no reason to suspect there's anything untoward about this older guy and this little town is a place where people don't even spit chewing gum on the sidewalk. Nothing ever happens here. It's peaceful and quiet, thank goodness. The local cops think they've had a bad day if they have to hand out more than a dozen speeding tickets.

It's now nearly two weeks later, and this guy has become quite a regular visitor. He can't be picking up a younger relative, though, as it seems there isn't anyone in particular among his little 'posse' with whom he leaves. Your curiosity is now pricked. You haven't any binoculars, but photography has always been a passion of yours, so you go back in the house and get your latest camera, attaching the longest lens you can find. What CAN they be doing? Now you're right up close with a much better view. Your blood freezes in your veins, for this guy is selling DRUGS to the kids! There can be no mistake. You see him taking money and furtively handing back little packets of what can only realistically be drugs! Your vigilance has paid off big-time: you've caught a dope dealer in action!

Your hands are shaking so badly from the shock of this sudden revelation that you can't get a good photo off. All the images from the pictures you've taken are without exception, blurry and juddery. Hell! What to do? What to do? You return indoors still reeling from your shattering discovery. This kind of thing NEVER happens in this little town. It only ever happens in larger towns and cities. You've seen pictures of it on TV and can't bring yourself to believe it's happening here, in small town America, right in front of your very eyes! Your heart is pumping nineteen to the dozen. You make a cup of coffee and try to calm down, but you're still shaking so badly out of a combination of shock and anger that you end up spilling most of it on the floor.

The very next day, this creep is once again at the school gates and you know what's coming. You're rather more cool and calm now that 24 hours of passed; still mad as hell, of course, but at least the shakes have gone. You steady your camera, zoom into the scene unfolding again before you, and crack off several good shots, all of which show money being exchanged for small packets of dope. "Got the bastard!" you whisper under your breath. You flick back through the pictures on the camera's rear screen. They're good, bright and sharp: excellent evidence. You return indoors to your computer to print them out, make yourself a congratulatory coffee (which you don't spill this time) and tuck the photos safely away in an envelope.

10am the next morning and you take your file of evidence straight to the police in the not unreasonable expectation that swift action will follow. You are somewhat dismayed, however, when the cop on duty screws his face up, takes a deep breath and asks you to wait whilst he takes them to a superior. "What's his problem," you wonder. Not enough pictures? Weren't they sharp enough? Or did he recognize the child of a colleague in one of the frames. Could be embarrassing, that! After a while two sargents appear, both looking very serious."What do you want us to do with these?" they inquire. Now you really ARE confused! "What do you think?" you reply in surprise, "I want you to nail this creep for selling drugs to kids. It's obvious enough, isn't it? This should be all the evidence you need here."

The older of the two sargents hands the envelope back to you. You sense deep unease in his demeanor. Something is just not right and you can't work out what it could possibly be. "What?? You mean you're not going to act on this??" you stutter incredulously. "I'm afraid there's nothing we can do," replies the younger cop, coldly. "But this guy is breaking the law in broad daylight selling drugs to schoolchildren!" You can feel your anger rising now, even higher than your confusion. "There's nothing any of us can do about it," they reply in unison. "Cases like these always get dropped at a higher level. It's just a waste of time," chimes in the older of the two. "My best advice to you," says the first cop with some gravity in his voice, "is to just turn a blind eye to it. Instances like this are simply more trouble than they're worth to get involved with."

You tuck your photos back in your pocket and storm out of the building, shaking your head in disgust and disbelief. The cops didn't want to know! The cops didn't want to know! This isn't how it's supposed to be in America! What the hell do these people think they're doing protecting this JERK? He's ruining these kids' futures, setting them on course for a lifetime of dependence and misery; many of them will end up in jail eventually from trying to feed the habit that this bastard is introducing them to (for his own selfish enrichment) and the law enforcement authorities could care less about it! What the hell is happening in this country? You head back to your apartment, experiencing several near-misses with other vehicles because your mind is totally preoccupied with the unbelievable stonewalling you got from the cops.

When you get home, your anger has just about reaching boiling point. You fix yourself another coffee, spilling most of it again, and sit out on the balcony to work out what to do next. The options seem pretty limited. You'd counted on the police to do what they're supposed to do, yet they won't lift a finger to help. The hours go by, but you just get more and more frustrated and angry. Going down there and busting this asshole on the nose is out of the question. 40 years ago, for sure! But age is not on your side and not only that, but you know that many of 'his sort' go around packing a gun. Why the hell should YOU - an older private citizen - have to turn vigilante and risk your life for something that the police should have willingly and instantly dealt with? The whole situation just baffles you.

After much deep thought, however, you come up with a great idea. You'll put up notices around the area to warn the parents about what's going on! You'll fire up that desk-top-publishing program and print dozens of warning posters with the best picture you took at the top of each sheet, being careful to pixelate the faces of the students, of course, but making sure the culprit is exposed clearly for the whole neighborhood to see! Yeah! That ought to do it! You set to work that very afternoon, spurred on by seeing the dope pusher up to his usual tricks with the kids again outside the school. "I'll fix that bastard!" you laugh to yourself, "Don't need those stupid cops after all!" Wasting no time, a few hours later you have a stack of 50 posters ready to go. "The cops might be useless, lazy, corrupt or incompetent, but they can't stop me from warning the parents!"

Next day, bright and early, you're out in the locality with your posters, a hammer and a box of tacks. Nothing's simpler than posting bills, and it doesn't take you very long before the first dozen are done. Much to your delight, you see one or two early-risers, dog-walkers and joggers, have already spotted them and have stopped to take a look-see. You fancy you know what their reaction will be: mad as hell! A short time later, however, you're just banging in a last nail on the 20th poster when a police cruiser pulls up along side. Two officers get out, one of which you'd encountered in the police station the day before. To your amazement, they're carrying several of of your warning notices; their jagged edges indicating they've just been hurriedly torn down...

Now things begin to take on an almost surreal quality. Without a word, the cops seize your remaining posters, the hammer and nails and bundle you into the back of the cruiser. Looks like you're heading down town. What the hell is going on? Why are they suddenly treating you like a common criminal? What the heck are they going to bust you for? Littering? People put up posters all the time and no one ever says nothing. "Would one of you people care to read me my rights?" you indignantly inquire. Silence. Neither officer says a word. Within minutes, the cruiser pulls up beside the police station and you're taken inside. The officers at the front desk seem to already know something. How odd. You can't believe all this trouble you're being put through just for trying to perform a civic service to your fellow neighborhood residents.

The younger officer is at the desk, unlike yesterday, working alone. He looks up as you're escorted in. Something in his eyes tells you what ever is coming, it's not going to be good. Finally, you get read your rights, although you really can't imagine why, as an honest citizen with no former convictions, you'd need to avail yourself of them. You will certainly not be pleading the 5th! You stride purposely up to the counter, look the cop straight in the eyes and say, "Is somebody going to tell me what the hell I'm supposed to have done?" The sargent raises his eyes and shoots you this cold, contemptuous look - the kind of look you imagine he normally reserves for someone hauled in on a major felony. He puts down his pen and says, "We already told you once to drop this. This is your second and final warning. If we have to haul you in again, you'll be charged." The hard glaze on his eyes tell you this cop isn't kidding. A moment's silence ensues before you can gather your wits.

"Charged??" you stammer, "charged with WHAT?" "Hate crime," replies the officer impassively. You're momentarily stunned. "Hate crime? Hate crime? How the hell do you arrive at charge like that? I'm no racist and the creep selling the drugs isn't black, nor even gay from what I've seen! Hate crime my ass!!" At this point a side door opens and a powerfully-built man in slacks and a sports jacket emerges. He motions to the cop to bring you over. You're guided through the door and into a small, sparsely-furnished room. The newcomer introduces himself as a detective and invites you to take a seat. He nods to the uniformed cop to leave the room, then turns to face you, remaining standing with a desk between you and him. You notice the desk is bolted to the floor. There's one window in this room, but the glass is frosted so there's no view of the outside. The atmosphere is rather intimidating, but you refuse to be cowed by it.

"Are YOU going to tell me what I'm supposed to have done?" you justifiably ask.
"Look, I'm gonna level with you," says the detective, "you were in the process of committing a serious felony in putting up those posters of yours and your actions amount to a hate crime, because by doing what you did, you're likely to arouse the anger of the community, and that can get ugly and out-of-control. You're fueling a lynch-mob mentality by putting up inflammatory material like that. This guy you claim is a drug dealer might be nothing of the sort yet wind up dead as a result of your actions. There's no telling where it might all end."
You're stunned and speechless at his words. He continues, "Do you know what will happen if you're convicted of a hate crime? First off, you go to jail, period. Could be 2 years; could be 10. Then there's a potentially unlimited fine. Plus all your property is subject to confiscation. It's a very serious matter indeed." You slouch back in the chair and cover your face with your hands. It's like some horribly bad dream - but it's ugly reality.

Now you're on the defensive. This guy has clearly misunderstood your motives. Yeah, that's got to be it. He'll understand if you just get your point across. "But I wasn't INTENDING to stir up any trouble," you begin. " - Doesn't matter," he cuts in, "your motives don't come into it. The applicable laws don't even consider them." "And this CREEP wasn't black, gay, hispanic, Jewish or anything else!" "That's irrelevant, too," replies the cop, "all the law is concerned with, in essence, is that you don't do anything which COULD incite hatred towards others."
"I was only acting for the public good!" you protest. "No defense," the cop states blankly, "I already done told you the law doesn't care what your motivations were; only with the possible CONSEQUENCES of your actions. Let's say for the sake of argument that you're right. This guy IS a dope peddler, but the parents, rather than form a lynch-mob, just escort their kids from the school, all nice and peaceful. That's no mitigation, because the material you distributed COULD still have given rise to big trouble among the community. That's still enough for a guilty verdict."

You pause momentarily taking in the enormity of what you've just be told. Being read the Riot Act for simply being a public-spirited citizen and trying to look out for your neighbors' kids is the last thing you expected. And now you're a hate criminal! "You're free to call a lawyer if you want," continues the cop, "but they'll just tell you exactly what I just did. It's your choice."
You martial together what remains of your resolve: "So basically what you're saying is that anyone can do anything they like to wreck society, but we mustn't raise awareness of it for fear of making decent people angry??"
"You can look at it any way you want," continues the cop, "we police officers don't MAKE the laws, we only ENFORCE them - and we DO enforce them. You have been warned for the last time. Today you walk out of here a free man, but if we ever find you're continuing with this one-man campaign of yours, by whatever means, even if it's just talking to people about it on the street, then you'll be back in here and charged under the hate crime legislation before you can say 'Thomas Jefferson.'"

Ladies and gentlemen, this is the nightmarish situation we're increasingly facing today with Western governments' strenuous efforts to suppress the Truth. The powers that be are contriving ever more devious and ingenious methods to prevent us from warning others about what is going on around us and who is behind it all. The time is already upon us to make the Big Decision: to remain cowed and silent whilst Evil flourishes, or to take a stand and REFUSE to submit to this new tyranny. Phaedrus and others in the blogosphere and elsewhere have already made that choice. If YOU haven't already done so, you'd better make your mind up damn fast, because the future of your children and their children will be extremely bleak, if everything that made us what we are increasingly ceasing to be, is further flushed into the rancid, malodorous, Jewish cesspit of cultural, ethnic, moral and social disintegration.

New York "Millionairess" gets 11 years for enslavement

.
This is what they'd like to do to us ALL. Make no mistake about it:

http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/06/26/sabhnani.sentence.ap/index.html

Note the bitch got a sentence less than the SCG state. Maybe her "lawyer" knew the judge.

Their Next Moves Towards Total Control

.
In a recent interview to the mainstream media which for some reason or another received more exposure in Europe than America, the incorrigible NWO-proponent, David Rockefeller made a quite remarkable admission. The 93 year-old billionaire stated on record that he STILL picks up cents he finds on the street! Not surprisingly, this fact was picked up on by so-called "right-wing" bloggers who went on to gleefully portray it as marking him out as displaying a "typical Jewish" character trait. The whole tone of their reporting of this disarmingly frank admission on Rockefeller's part was one of scathing satire. They sought to pillory Rockefeller over his penny-pinching for its dubious humor value, yet singularly failed to look beyond it. This was a rather unfortunate omission on their part which we will attempt to remedy here in this article.

Anyone who knows anything about the way the world is run will know that Rockefeller is one of a handful of global 'kingpins' who have shaped this ugly world in which we live in the fashion of their own craven image. To present this issue solely as a points-scoring exercise to 'get one over on the Jews' is a total cop-out. We are not talking about some wacky, Jewish pawnbroker or tailor or theoretical physicist or whatever else it may be the Jews typically gravitate to, but rather a man who, through his vast wealth and intimate, high-level contacts with others, has marked him out as what Huxley (in the original Brave New World) described as a "World Controller" - he and his fellow Satan-worshipers (no kidding!)formulate the Plan - the Jewish Agenda - and their underlings comprising presidents, prime ministers, kings and queens subsequently implement it supranationally. There is now precious little, if any, escape from it anywhere in the West. Wherever one goes, regardless of the Will of the people, this Agenda is being inexorably rolled-out, like it or not.

In which ever country we reside, though the names of the governments and political parties may change, this illusion of choice renders true democracy utterly impotent. There is NO real, meaningful democracy now in the US, Canada, Britain, France and Germany, to name but five out of an untold number of countries among which this virus has become endemic. In the US, we have 'One Party with two Names'. They're essentially no different beyond a little superficial varnish and style of logo. It's the same in Europe. Choice is an illusion and leaders are not elected, but SELECTED by the likes of Rockefeller in the US, his fellow Jew, Evelyn (Baron)Rothschild in London, and 'good friend of Israel', Rupert Murdoch in Australia. The circle of this ultimate power is rather wider, but is dominated as one might expect, by Jews who all share Rockefeller's pathogenic craving for money. Phaedrus believes that when a 93 year-old billionaire - of any ethnic background - can't keep himself from picking up nickels in the street, then something is desperately wrong with said person.

Such a person is not acting rationally, and it's NOT a subject for humor any more than it is for sympathy. Behavior such as this is pathological; it's a form of mental illness. I don't know about you, but I don't want somebody with this character trait running the Western world. There must be no room for these sickos in any sphere of policy formation for they are clearly ill and out of touch with reality. Worse yet, Rockefeller has intimate designs on us which his aforementioned underlings are in the process of developing under the guise of "real ID" - which on the face of it sounds innocuous enough, which is just how it's supposed to sound (to begin with, anyway) however in reality it is everything BUT harmless. Rockefeller and his kind want everyone micro-chipped. They want EVERYONE to be implanted with a tiny device, little bigger than a grain of rice, that will tell the authorities exactly where each of us is and who we are with, every minute of every day, for as long as we live. The technology is already here. It is now simply a matter of implementation. This is the tricky part, but sadly it is far from an insuperable barrier as we shall see below.

The initial reaction of most decent people on hearing about this program is understandably one of deep suspicion. It brings Big Brother right up to our faces and it ain't pretty. The Jews know this - and they're smart people. They've contrived a P-R charm offensive which will mollify the worst doubts and fears of the majority of citizens. And to be fair, the arguments they will use to push this measure through are very powerful. They'll tell us that we'll no longer need to worry about passports at airports to fly, nor at the bank to draw money. They'll tell us that our children will never again be at risk of kidnap or abduction by strangers. They'll extol the fact that any spouse that's in breach of a restraining order from seeing his family will be instantly identified as having strayed outside his court-sanctioned area and will be picked up and arrested before he or she can do any harm to his or her estranged family.

And it doesn't end there. They'll further induce us with the prospect that from then on in, there'll be no more wrongful convictions. Suspects will be back-traced to the precise moment a murder or robbery was committed to see if they were indeed present at the crime scene. There'll be no more need for flawed alibi evidence and no more false alibis. Only the guilty will be convicted; the innocent exonerated. Furthermore, crooks "on the run" will become a thing of the past as there will be nowhere for them to hide with these tracking transponders buried deep under their flesh, flagging their location to the government every few seconds. Eventually, EVERYTHING we need will be on these chips. We won't need to take any ID or money with us when we go on holiday. Our passports can't then be stolen, neither can our cash. We have to face the facts, here, guys; the arguments in favor of micro-chipping are very hard indeed to counter - certainly for the average Joe of limited intelligence, at any rate. Of course, to those of us acutely aware that the REAL agenda is very much less benign will already be seeing many grave dangers that this technology threatends.

For an overview of how such a potentially invaluable system might be misused, we need not, however, resort to our fevered imaginations, for David Rockefeller has already spilled the beans in some off-the-cuff remarks he made earlier this year. What did he let slip? Pretty much what you might imagine. Since we're all busy people and time is short, let's summarize his exposition on the matter. What follows is not verbatim, but it's the gist, the guts, the essence of what he revealed:

The plan should require little compulsion until the latter stages. Initially it will be rolled out for the protection of children and most parents will welcome it. Even if it WERE made compulsory for ALL children to be micro-chipped, the vast majority of parents would willingly consent to it, since the protection of their kids naturally comes above all else in any decent parent's mind. Next, the folks in the prisons will be chipped; petty crooks included. They'll be told they'll be eligible for earlier release on parole now the authorities can keep total tabs on their whereabouts. Most prisoners aren't too smart and will readily submit to any initiative that gets them out of the slammer earlier than would otherwise be the case. Further on down the line, citizens' chips will carry more financial information on their tax status, their CV history and so-forth, and employers will be encouraged through tax-breaks, to only hire workers who are so chipped. All the while an ever-shrinking group of libertarians who have resisted signing up for implantation will find living their lives increasingly difficult due to essential services becoming less and less available around them.

In the final stages of the roll-out, it may become impossible, in a then cashless society, to even buy basic groceries at a supermarket if you haven't been chipped-up, as all your money will be on the chip and your salary will be credited directly to it. There will be no fine-defaulting in future as any fines you incur will be deducted remotely from your chip. Likewise, child-support payments and such like. Running off and setting up home someplace else under a new name will no longer do any good for deadbeat dads who try to evade their responsibilities towards the children they have fathered. This will all sound fairly sensible to Joe Public on the face of it. Chipping undeniably confers many benefits - if administered by a benevolent government, of course. But Rockefeller and his cohorts are very far from benign. When asked to consider the civil rights aspects and what might happen in future if protesters or dissidents subsequently formed the view that the information held on their chips had become too extensive, intrusive, or was being misused, he replied, "Oh, well, those people will have simply have their chips turned off. They'll become essentially non-persons."

Phaedrus wonders how dissidents and activists such as ourselves would manage in a cashless, cardless, passportless future with our identities and our savings summary stripped from us. It could be pretty tough to survive! And doubtless that is exactly what THEY will wish to ensure for anyone with the audacity to say "NO!"

Huxley Warned Us: parts 1 to 16 complete

In answer to the request from Kenny's Sideshow (great blog, guys) I'm reposting this series as I gather quite a lot of folks have also missed the odd part or two from their archives...

Huxley Warned Us: Part 16
This, the final part of our examination of the key points arising out of Huxley's dire prediction of the future contains a vital warning message for us all. Calling out to us from a half a century ago, the great visionary wrote:

"The methods employed by orthodox educators were and still are extremely inefficient. Under a scientific dictator education will really work - with the result that most men and women will grow up to love their servitude and will never dream of revolution. There seems to be no good reason why a thoroughly scientific dictatorship should ever be overthrown.

"Meanwhile there is still freedom left in the world. Many young people, it is true, do not seem to value freedom. But some of us still believe that, without freedom, human beings cannot become fully human and that freedom is therefore supremely valuable. Perhaps the forces that now menace freedom are too strong to be resisted for very long. It is still our duty to do whatever we can to resist them them."

But sadly we haven't. Everything that makes us what we are has been and continues to be spirited away from us little by little. 50 years after Huxley's strident warning, we've continued to permit this situation to develop through our indifference and collective apathy. We've been too preoccupied - as Huxley observed - with our "endless appetite for distractions" - which Baywatch actress has the biggest tits; Britney Spears' antics, the NFL rankings, blockbuster movies, must-have gadgets, Beyonce's ass, Gerry Springer, Rikki Lake and Oprah Winfrey. We've been hypnotized by all these media rodeo clowns while the Zionist bull was busy trashing our cultural china shop.

Our enemies, that is to say, the traitors who make our laws and broker deals with foreign powers behind our backs; who sell our liberties and hard-fought freedoms for 30 pieces of Jewish silver are all part of the same poison pot, to wit: newspaper proprietors, magazine editors, TV studio executives, movie producers, advertising agents, talk-show hosts, Marxists, internationalists, Jewish bankers, Senior Freemasons, CEOs of global corporations and the One World Government in waiting: the Bilderbergers, the Trilateralists, the CFRers, AIPAC and all the rest of the lying, scheming, cheating scum.

There are some very smart people in the above list, however, make no mistake about it. Whilst you and me have been drunkenly slurring in some seedy bar over who the Red Sox's best ever pitcher was, the agents of our destruction were slowly but surely drawing their plans against us (to paraphrase Wells). They have researched with exquisite detail all our foibles and failings. They are master manipulators par excellence. If we continue with our blind indifference to our approaching fate, then we'll have fully deserved it. Huxley's final conclusion in the lines quoted above is:

"There seems to be no good reason why a thoroughly scientific dictatorship should ever be overthrown."

Think about that stark assessment for a moment. It's perfectly correct. Once they've finally got us, they've got us for keeps. Us, our children and our children's children's children. They'll have completely re-written history by then. As a people, we won't know who we are any more. We'll be whatever THEY tell us we are. This revisionism - the only kind permitted it seems - has ALREADY been underway in the West for some time, as you may be aware. In due course we will become irreversibly enslaved by these criminals for all time to come - just as their 'holy' book foretells. As Huxley states, it simply won't occur to our grandchildren to question their subservience, but even if they were to, the Jews would have ALL the answers. I don't know about you, but as far as this blogger is concerned, that's a prospect that's worth fighting to the last drop of blood to prevent. I WILL NOT BETRAY MY CULTURAL HERITAGE.


Huxley Warned Us: Part 15
Brave New World Revisited, 1958:

"We see, then, that the disease of over-organization has been clearly recognized, that various comprehensive remedies have been prescribed and that experimental treatments of symptoms have been attempted here and there, often with considerable success. And yet, in spite of all this preaching and this exemplary practice, the disease grows steadily worse.
We know that it is unsafe to allow power to be concentrated in the hands of a ruling oligarchy; nevertheless power is in fact being concentrated in fewer and fewer hands. We know that, for most people, life in a huge modern city is anonymous, atomic, less than fully human; nevertheless the huge cities grow steadily huger and the pattern of urban-industrial living remains unchanged. We know that, in a very large complex society, democracy is almost meaningless except in relation to autonomous groups of manageable size; nevertheless more and more of every nation's affairs are managed by the bureaucrats of Big Government and Big Business. It is only too evident that, in practice, the problem of over-organization is almost as hard to solve as the problem of overpopulation. In both cases we know what ought to be done; but in neither case have we been able, as yet, to act effectively upon our knowledge."


This situation of over-organization to which Huxley constantly returns during the course of his work is no accident, but has in fact arisen by design. Organizational complexity is an absolute NECESSITY for the Jew to carry out his plans; his machinations would be readily exposed without it. One thing Jews hate above all else is EXPOSURE. Hitler put it almost poetically in Mein Kampf. The exact quote - though quite well known - eludes me at present, but suffice it to say that it perfectly describes how the Jews desire as many walls of opacity to work behind as they can possibly erect. So the more complex and confusing our world is, all the better for them to work their evil against us. This is one of the primary driving forces behind the advent of Big Government, which the Jews are always so keen to promote (at OUR expense of course).

Things have since unfortunately deteriorated beyond the point where the author's proposed solution would be of any help to us. It was a constructive suggestion 50 years ago perhaps, but is no longer applicable. We didn't take the necessary action when we should have. Our parents let us down just as we are now letting our own children down; consigning them to a life of slavery as a result of our indolence and apathy. For it is undeniably true that "an ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure" - it's less messy for one thing. We didn't make the effort in prevention, so our only remaining option now is to CURE and that will be a much uglier job.

I believe it's fitting at this point to conclude this section with an apposite quote from Winston Churchill:

"If you draft 10,000 regulations, you destroy all respect for the law."

Too many laws, too much complexity. What are we going to do about it?


Huxley Warned Us: Part 14
Aldous Huxley:

"'Free as a bird', we say, and envy the winged creatures for their power of unrestricted movement in all the three dimensions. But, alas, we forget the dodo. Any bird that has learned how to grub up a good living without being compelled to use its wings will soon renounce the privilege of flight and remain forever grounded. Something analogous is true of human beings. If the bread is supplied regularly and copiously three times a day, many of them will be perfectly content to live by bread alone - or at least by bread and circuses alone. 'In the end', says the Grand Inquisitor in Dostoevsky's parable, 'in the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, "Make us your slaves, but feed us. '"

Isn't this closely analagous to the situation we find ourselves in today? In this couch-potato society, It certainly strikes Phaedrus that way. Though we expect rather more from life than just bread three times a day, it isn't THAT much more. The vast majority of people in the West constitute little more than a mindless peasant underclass that has resigned itself to the treadmill of daily life. People work for 50 years just to put food on the table and keep a roof over their heads, from what little they have left after the ravages of direct and indirect taxation and Jewish investment frauds like pension schemes.

Throughout history, it has regrettably proven to be the case that the peasants - in whichever country - will undergo the most dire privations at the hands of their exploitative masters before they are driven into taking effective action to overthrow the tyranny and oppression from which they suffer. They can be ground down by decades of maltreatment and forced almost to the point of starvation before they will rise up and overturn the established order of things. So the situation we find ourselves in today is entirely of our own collective making. We have what we deserve.

Of course this despairing assessment isn't the whole story. We have a peasantry of so many hundreds of millions of people in the West because the common people are kept in the dark as to their true potential by the omnipresent, Jew-controlled media which is keen to foster in them the idea that the status quo is beyond question and it's simply the way things are and have always been. This is the vital importance of 'entertainment' in the modern world. Every single minute we spend watching some trashy TV soap or reading some garbage newspaper is a minute taxed from our lives. It is a minute during which we simply do not question why the world is in such a dreadful mess and who is responsible for it.

The mainstream jewsmedia performs the role of the rodeo clown with impeccable aplomb. TV networks have developed highly successful techniques for ensuring that once we are watching a channel, we will continue to do so for far longer than we had intended and for far longer than is good for us. They've moved on quite a bit since the days of 'Don't touch that dial!' And all the while we are gawping at their mind-rotting drivel, the Jews know we are no threat to them. If we are ever to liberate our peasant classes from their servitude of the Jew and Jewish interests, then we must find a way to break the media's hold over enough of them for the bulk to follow. In short, we need to work towards achieving a critical mass of Jew-awareness.


Huxley Warned Us: Part 13
From Brave New World Revisited, 1958:

"In practice, as recent history has repeatedly shown, the right to vote, by itself, is no guarantee of liberty. Therefore, if you wish to avoid dictatorship by plebiscite, break up modern society's vast, machine-like collectives into self-governing, voluntarily co-operating groups, capable of functioning outside the bureaucratic systems of Big Business and Big Government. Overpopulation and over-organization have produced the modern metropolis, in which a fully human life of multiple personal relationships has become almost impossible. Therefore, if you wish to avoid the spiritual impoverishment of individuals and whole societies, leave the metropolis and revive the small country community, or alternatively humanize the metropolis by creating within its network of mechanical organizations the urban equivalents of small country communities, in which individuals can meet and co-operate as complete persons, not as the mere embodiments of specialized functions."


Note here that even in the America of the late 1950s, the author was already deeply suspicious of democracy and how it could be subverted by the interests of Big Business. We tend to look back misty-eyed on that seemingly halcyon era from our present standpoint and see it as the golden age of liberty, but it is evident from Huxley's concerns that it was already under threat. My personal belief is that the origins of this erosion of our freedoms had its seeds in our accepting large numbers of Jews fleeing the Nazis from 1930's europe. Something seems to have happened within a few years of the ending of WWII that vastly accelerated the cultural decline that had been simmering away since the 1920s when the numbers of Jews in positions of public influence (Hollywood excepted) was much lower.

The Jews we were foolishly good-hearted enough to welcome to our shores repaid our kindness by proceeding to gnaw away at this once-great country from the inside. They quickly wriggled their way into powerful positions of public influence and seized control of the mass media, and by so doing, the government itself. They enriched themselves at our expense and funneled huge amounts of our tax-dollars to that cancerous, running sore of the Middle East, Israel. Additionally, their appetite for blood had to be satiated by the sacrifice of great numbers of our young people in fighting foreign adventures that were of no benefit to us whatsoever. But with their guile, their determination and their self-belief in their "entitlement" to call all the shots, they somehow got away with it – and still do.

I can almost hear the call of every great civilization in history crying out to America in the late 1930: "Please, please, don't let these Devils in! Afford them no sanctuary! They may look like you and talk like you - they're very good at that - but they're evil! You let them into your great country and within 100 years it'll be nothing but a rotting corpse. These parasites will have eaten away everything you have worked for and totally destroyed your wealth, your way of life and cultural heritage. We beg you from our bitter experience of 3,000 years of dealings with these nomadic parasites: slay them while you still may, for if you fail, then in time they will lay your country waste! Take heed, America! Take heed!"

Pity we couldn't hear them.


Huxley Warned Us: Part 12
Aldous Huxley:

"Under the relentless thrust of accelerating overpopulation and increas­ing over-organization, and by means of ever more effective methods of mind-manipulation, the democracies will change their nature; the quaint old forms - elections, parliaments, Supreme Courts and all the rest - will remain. The underlying substance will be a new kind of non-violent totalitarianism. All the traditional names, all the hallowed slogans will remain exactly what they were in the good old days. Democracy and freedom will be the theme of every broadcast and editorial ­but democracy and freedom in a strictly Pickwickian sense. Meanwhile the ruling oligarchy and its highly trained elite of soldiers, policemen, thought-manufacturers and mind-­manipulators will quietly run the show as they see fit."

Once again, time has proved the great visionary spot-on. The maintenance of these 'props of democracy' is simply a sham which purports to confer some legitimacy to what is wholly illegitimate. The US and many other Western countries are run on behalf of, and in the interests of, World Jewry. However it may appear and whatever our so-called 'leaders' tell us, that is what is ultimately behind the elaborate charade that democracy has become. The interests of you and me and our people count for nothing. We're just here to be taxed and to furnish them substance. Our so-called 'leaders' make promises they never keep just to get elected. Once elected, they get back to serving their true masters for their own naked self-enrichment and aggrandizement - and the rest of us can go to hell in a handbasket:

"How can we control the vast impersonal forces that now menace our hard-won freedoms? On the verbal level and in general terms, the question may be answered with the utmost ease. Consider the problem of overpopulation. Rapidly mounting human numbers are pressing ever more heavily on natural resources. What is to be done? Obviously we must, with all possible speed, reduce the birth rate to the point where it does not exceed the death rate. At the same time we must, with all possible speed, increase food production, we must institute and implement a world-wide policy for conserving our soils and our forests, we must develop practical substitutes, preferably less dangerous and less rapidly exhaustible than uranium, for our present fuels; and, while husbanding our dwindling resources of easily available minerals, we must work out new and not too costly methods for extracting these minerals from ever poorer and poorer ores - the poorest ore of all being sea water. But all this, needless to say, is almost infinitely easier said than done. The annual increase of numbers should be reduced. But how? We are given two choices - famine, pestilence and war on the one
hand, birth control on the other"

Of course the overpopulation problem has grown very much worse since Huxley wrote these words fifty years ago. A population reduction in the order of perhaps as much as 80% is now required. That's BILLIONS of people we're talking about. And this is what the agents of the NWO are secretively working towards. Clearly they're not interested in Huxley's birth control solution, as the flagrant encouragement of casual free sex and racial interbreeding in the popular media attests. That leaves us with famine, pestilence and war. No big surprise here! For a race of people that has always found the stench of rotting goyim flesh appealing, I think we could have seen it coming.

Phaedrus does not wish to appear like some Bible-thumping religious nut, but there is something disturbingly similar between Judaism and Satanism. Harold Rosenthal breezily admitted over 30 years ago (somewhat ill-advisedly in hindsight given the advent of the Internet) that the God of the Jews is actually Lucifer. When we see the works of these people given free reign, as in Palestine, it isn't difficult to form the view that there's something distinctly evil about them and their mindset. How the hell we permit such entities to have vast and over-arching influence in our day-to-day lives is one of world's great mysteries. THEY MUST BE STOPPED BEFORE THEY KILL US ALL.


Huxley Warned Us: Part 11
Aldous Huxley, 1958:

"Is individual freedom compatible with a high degree of individual suggestibility? Can democratic institutions survive the subversion from within of skilled mind-manipulators trained in the science and art of exploiting the suggestibility
both of individuals and of crowds? To what extent can the
inborn tendency to be too suggestible for one's own good or the good of a democratic society be neutralized by education?"


Critical questions indeed! To anyone listlessly surveying our contemporary scene of a half century later, it must appear at first sight that the battle for free thought and independent Will has already been lost. Such vast numbers of people appear to have permanently succumbed to the barrage of incessant propaganda that has crashed through our lives for so many decades. The masses really do appear to be completely brainwashed. However, we shall see that this bleak assessment is overly pessimistic by some considerable measure - thank God!

In Phaedrus' very extensive personal experience, the Politically-Correct quickly have their erroneous paradigm of the world shattered for good once confronted with the bare and unadulterated FACTS. The reason for this is that Politically-Correct dogma is grounded in falsehoods. It is a CONTRIVANCE. It is unable to stand up to any level of scrutiny and reason and quickly crumbles to pieces in the face of it. Thanking God, I can honestly state here that of the scores of persons I have confronted one-to-one personally, NOT A SINGLE ONE has left my presence still clinging to their former ideological baggage. NOT ONE!

It is remarkable but true. Notwithstanding the decades of non-stop propaganda through every conceivable Jewish-controlled medium both overt and subliminal; notwithstanding indoctrination by left-wing libertine perverts in our schools; notwithstanding lectures from appointees in our local and national government - notwithstanding all of this, the dogma of the United Nations, the politically-correct and the social engineers for all their exquisite research and ingenuity - for all that - the depth of penetration of this poisonous mindset on the average citizen is is little more than skin deep and as fragile as an eggshell!

I propose to go no further in this article to explain my favored technique for getting people to see sense (it was published here around last June and I will repost it again for those who cannot find it) as it is off-topic for this discussion on Huxley. Suffice it say here, that propaganda alone, unassisted by drugs, has never permanently damaged anyone's thinking beyond repair. Give me no more than one hour with 80% of people and I'll easily have them unplugged from the Matrix. But having said that, complacency will kill us. Though it IS a simple matter to free the minds of the people, this is dependent on us REACHING them in mass numbers. Until and unless we can get that vital message out, we still remain at grave risk of the permanent, blind enslavement Huxley foresaw:

"The nature of psychological compulsion is such that those who act under constraint remain under the impression that they are acting on their own initiative. The victim of mind-manipulation does not know that he is a victim. To him, the walls of his prison are invisible, and he believes himself to be free. That he is not free is apparent only to other people. His servitude is strictly objective." - AH.


Huxley Warned Us: Part 10
In this extract, Huxley addresses one of the Biggest Lies of the 20th Century - that all men are created equal.

Aldous Huxley, 1958:

"...The orgy of spying, lynching and judicial murder, which these wrong views about magic made logical and mandatory, was not matched until our own days, when the Communist ethic, based upon erroneous views about race, commanded and justified atrocities on an even greater scale. Consequences hardly less undesirable are likely to follow the general adoption of a Social Ethic, based upon the erroneous view that ours is a fully social species, that human infants are born uniform and that individuals are the product of conditioning by and within the collective environment. If these views were correct, if human beings were in fact the members of a truly social species, and if their individual differences were trifling and could be completely ironed out by appropriate conditioning, then, obviously, there would be no need for liberty and the State would be justified in persecuting the heretics who demanded it..."


Here the esteemed writer and visionary takes a distinct swipe against the founders of the United Nations. We have only this (presumably censored) Jewish version of his words from Random House Publishing to go by, but nevertheless it clear that Huxley had no time at all for Communist dogma and rounded repudiated it. It is only sad that we cannot study his original manuscript, for it is highly likely that he would have spelled out in no uncertain terms the inferior forms of life to which he merely alludes here in this 'sanitized version' - for it was written many years prior to the advent of political-correctness and has presumably been 'cleaned up' to avoid offense.

Huxley vehemently eschews the doctrine that all men would be equal in later life if they were each given the same opportunities from birth. Naturally, he tacitly refers to the Negro races here, to whose shortcomings Communism was intentionally blind. The UN/NWO official line is that all extended genetic phenotypes are essentially identical in all but superficial appearance. But we all - those of us in the REAL world that is - know as well as Huxley that there is a striking correlation between IQ and race, with the southern African Bantu coming out bottom of the pile. No amount of preferential, special schooling or 'positive discrimination' can make a silk purse out of a pig's ear. It's an uncomfortable FACT for our white Liberal friends that whilst nurture IS important, NATURE predominates and cannot be denied. A southern African Bantu (or one of its descendants now in Europe or America) can no more become an accomplished scientist, artist or writer, than can a mongrel puppy born in a stable can grow up a racehorse.

If we wish to learn the intrinsic capabilities of ANY race, we need merely to examine their cultural heritage; there's no need to make up stupid lies to pretend things are otherwise. The Negro, like the Jew and the Gypsy, have NOTHING to show for their much-vaunted cultures. They are all incapable of surviving by themselves. The Negroes are simply useless AT BEST, the Gypsies are mostly harmless but can be a dang nuisance at times, and the Jew..... Well, for the Jew I think we need a rather more exhaustive and intensive examination than this study of Huxley's prophecies allows!


Huxley Warned Us: Part 9
Aldous Huxley, 50 years ago in Brave New World Revisited:

"...That a dictator could, if he so desired, make use of [certain psychotropic chemicals] for political purposes is obvious. He could ensure himself against political unrest by changing the chemistry of his subjects' brains and so making them content with their servile conditions. He could use tranquillizers to calm the excited, stimulants to arouse enthusiasm in the indifferent, hallucinants to distract the attention of the wretched from their miseries.

"But how, it may be asked, will the dictator get his subjects to take the pills that will make them think, feel and behave in the ways he finds desirable? In all probability it will be enough merely to make the pills available. Today alcohol and tobacco are available, and people spend considerably more on these very unsatisfactory euphorics, pseudo­stimulants and sedatives than they are ready to spend on the education of their children."

We now know from secret experimental data released by Russia following a series of experiments carried out in the 1960s that adding fluoride to water supplies in concentrations of as little as 1ppm induces in subjects enhanced levels of susceptibility and compliance - a very useful tool indeed for any wayward government. Our so-called 'leaders' are still toying with the idea of introducing it into our drinking water on the grounds of improving dental health, notwithstanding that its psychotropic effects are becoming increasingly known.

So the big question is: could the dental health motive have been a mere pretext all along? Given that the discussion over fluoride remains on-going long after its mind-altering properties have been publicized, it seems quite likely. If there is one thing Huxley told us that we must never forget it is that our real enemies in the West are our governments. They are infinitely more dangerous to us than all the world's disparate terrorist groupings put together. Do we really know what they're injecting our kids with? Could there be more to it than simple vaccination?


Huxley Warned Us: Part 8
In Part 7, we were able to see how blanket control over the media had enabled the Jews to become the only game in town when it came to dissemination of information and that the alphabet soup of TV channels on offer that suggest the availability of free choice is simply an illusion. Virtually ALL the networks are pushing forward the NWO agenda by promoting the idea that free-trade, globalization and mass movements of peoples between countries is a Good Thing which brings jobs and prosperity. And whilst we dive headlong into embracing this cultural suicide, the really big gainers, as always, are the Jews. By acting as intermediaries, agents and obstacles between parties in international trade (a core business of this parasite going back Millenia) they can ALWAYS make a good living, regardless of how impoverished those poor fools competing for ever worsening living standards consequently become.
Huxley, 1958:

"In the West, democratic principles are proclaimed and many able and conscientious publicists do their best to supply electors with adequate information and to persuade them, by rational argument, to make realistic choices in the light of that information. All this is greatly to the good. But unfortunately propaganda in the Western democracies above all in America, has two faces and a divided personality. In charge of the editorial department there is often a democratic Dr Jekyll - a propagandist who would be very happy to prove that John Dewey had been right about the ability of human nature to respond to truth and reason. But this worthy man controls only a part of the machinery of mass communication.


"In charge of advertising we find an anti-democrat because anti-rational, Mr Hyde - or rather a Doctor Hyde, for Hyde is now a Ph.D. in psychology and has a master's degree as well in the Social Sciences. This Dr Hyde would be very unhappy indeed if everybody always lived up to John Dewey's faith in human nature. Truth and reason are Jekyll's affairs, not his . Hyde is a Motivation Analyst, and his business is to study human weaknesses and failings, to investigate those un­conscious desires and fears by which so much of men's conscious thinking and overt doing is determined. And he does this, not in the spirit of the moralist who would like to make people better, or of the physician who would like to improve health, but simply in order to find out the best way to take advantage of their ignorance and to exploit their irrationality for the pecuniary benefit of his employers."


Here again, Huxley re-affirms his conviction that the mass media is working AGAINST the best interests of the people. His 'Dr. Hyde' character is alive and with us in the West today, too. Yet since we are now 50 years down the road from when Huxley penned his observations, the new Dr. Hyde of today has infinitely more techniques for deception in his armory. Fifty years of endless studies into what makes people tick in the most microscopic areas of their lives has yielded hundreds of thousands of documents and reports detailing every gleanable fact from the human psyche and how it may be ruthlessly and cynically manipulated to ensure that the naked greed of the Jew is to some extent at least satiated. And all this goes on with the full backing of Western governments, the leaders of which have become phenomenally wealthy for their tacit assistance in selling out the true interests of the people. So much for 'democracy.' So much for 'public service.'


Huxley Warned Us: Part 7
Aldous Huxley, 1958:

"Mass communication, in a word, is neither good nor bad; it is simply a force and, like any other force, it can be used either well or ill. Used in one way, the press, the radio and the cinema are indispensable to the survival of democracy. Used in another way, they are among the most powerful weapons in the dictator's armory. In the field of mass communications as in almost every other field of enterprise, technological progress has hurt the Little Man and helped the Big Man. As lately as [1910], every democratic country could boast of a great number of small journals and local newspapers. Thousands of country editors expressed thousands of independent opinions. Somewhere or other almost anybody could get almost anything printed.

"Today the press is still legally free; but most of the little papers have disappeared. The cost of wood-pulp, of modern printing machinery and of syndicated news is too high for the Little Man. In the totalitarian East there is political censorship, and the media of mass communication are controlled by the State. In the democratic West there is economic censorship and the media of mass communication are controlled by members of the Power Elite. Censorship by rising costs and concentration of communication-power in the hands of a few big concerns is less objectionable than State ownership and government propaganda; but certainly it is not something of which a Jeffersonian democrat could possibly approve.

"In regard to propaganda, the early advocates of universal literacy and a free press envisaged only two possibilities: the propaganda might be true, or it might be false. They did not foresee what in fact has happened, above all in our Western capitalist democracies - the development of a vast mass communications industry, concerned in the main neither with the true nor the false, but with the unreal, the more or less totally irrelevant. In a word, they failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions."


Here we are, half a century on and this situation has, as one might reasonably expect, grown worse still. There was always some element of propaganda in Western media, even pre-Huxley, but it was nothing as remotely unremitting and omnipresent as it is today. Governments and large media organizations (increasingly one and the same entity) could have used their influence to bring about a better society, but they chose, by accident or design, to do the opposite. And the only place where genuine freedom of expression yet survives in on the Internet - and that may not be for very much longer if the powers that be have their way.

The media of today serves - almost without exception - the interests of 'Big Business' with its free trade and globalization agenda; selling out the interests of hard-working people for the VAST self-enrichment of what Huxley calls the 'Power Elite'. Eye-wateringly large sums are made by big business interests (read "Jews") which have asset-stripped this nation and others on an epic scale. The demise of the manufacturing heartlands of the northern midwest attest to this. Ruin, decay, family breakdown, drugs and crime have replaced ordered and prosperous communities. This is all solely due to the Jews' internationalist, borderless world where decent Americans are forced to compete with Chinese peasants and the like who sell their labor for little more than a bowl of rice a day.

The advertising element of the popular media has gotten totally out of control, too. Rather than satisfying consumers' genuine needs and desires as was once the case, it has become a dragon of a business model that festers on our worst fears and anxieties. We no longer buy useful products or services because we NEED them, we buy junk, mass-produced garbage by the shed-load in order to prove to our friends and neighbors that we're 'doing well' and have a 'comfortable lifestyle.' Every advertisement screams out to us that we're missing out on something; if we don't constantly and wantonly consume, there must be something fundamentally wrong in our lives.

Advertising media attempts to make us feel rotten and inadequate and instills in us a a sense of permanent dissatisfaction with every aspect of our existence. The impetus from this form of madness comes from the craven greed of a race of beings who can NEVER have enough and don't care what damage they do in going after it. The American dream was never about having a driveway stuffed full of sports utility vehicles. It was never about having a glamor model for a wife. It was never about taking 4 holidays a year. It was never about having a widescreen TV in every room spewing out its garbage. It was never about so much stuff that the Jews have convinced us, through their stranglehold over the mass media, is what we should be striving for.

If we could only break away from this madness, en-masse, and adopt the kind of lifestyle advocated by the likes of Emerson and Thoreau, the Tribe of Satan would be out of business in a flash. They'd never make a single cent out of us, just as they can't make a penny out of the Amish community. Maybe one day soon when the dollar collapses to Absolute Zero and folks wake up to the reality of the lies, the distortions, the fraud and deceit that's been perpetrated against us for decades, there'll come a realization that all the junk that the Jews told us was so desirable and indispensable wasn't worth jack. Then perhaps we can re-establish this broken, fucked-up society along decent lines. Until that happy day, keep those guns oiled.


Huxley warned Us: Part 6

Aldous Huxley writing in 'Brave New World Revisited' exactly 50 years ago:

"Jefferson said: 'If a nation expects to be ignorant and free
it expects what never was and never will be ... The people cannot be safe without information. Where the press is free, and every man able to read, all is safe.'"

He continues:

"Across the Atlantic another passionate believer in reason was thinking, about the same time, in almost precisely similar terms. Here is what John Stuart Mill wrote of his father, the utilitarian philo­sopher, James Mill: 'So complete was his reliance upon the influence of reason over the minds of mankind, whenever it is [attention-grabbing] distractions of the most fascinating nature are deliberately used as instruments of policy, for the purpose of preventing people from paying too much attention to the realities of the social and political situation.

"The other world of religion is different from the other world of entertainment; but they still resemble one another in being most decidedly 'not of this world'. Both are distractions and, if lived in too continuously, both can become, in Marx's phrase, 'the opium of the people' and so a threat to freedom. Only the vigilant can maintain their liberties, and only those who are constantly and intelligently on the spot can hope to govern themselves effectively by democratic procedures.

" A society, most of whose members spend a great part of their time not on the spot, not here and now and in the calculable future, but somewhere else, in the irrelevant other worlds of sport and soap opera, of mythology and metaphysical fantasy, will find it hard to resist the encroachments of those who would manipulate and control it."

Consider for a moment the incisive nature and power of this simple observation. Huxley at once within one and the same sentence correctly identifies the fundamental reasons behind the way we live today: a disingenuous, Jew-controlled media, an utterly corrupted government, and the masses of idle, ignorant, gullible propaganda-consumers.

Thankfully, you and I, Gentile reader, are not among this class of the intellectually impoverished. We have awoken to the threats that surround us. We are wise to the motivations of those behind it. It is our DUTY to ensure everyone else is likewise made aware of exactly what has been going on now for many decades. The only 'free press' today is the Internet. Out the Liars and murderers! To hell with them! Expose them all!



Huxley Warned Us: Part 5

Aldous Huxley, 1958:

"No people that passes abruptly from a state of subservience under the rule of a despot to the completely unfamiliar state of political independence can be said to have a fair chance of making democratic institutions work. Again, no people in a precarious economic condition has a fair chance of being able to govern itself democratically. [true freedom] flourishes in an atmosphere of prosperity and declines as declining prosperity makes it necessary for the government to intervene ever more frequently and drastically in the affairs of its subjects. Overpopulation and over-organization are two conditions which, as I have already pointed out, deprive a society of a fair chance of making democratic institutions work effectively. We see, then, that there are certain historical, economic, demographic and technological conditions which make it very hard for Jefferson's rational animals, endowed by nature with inalienable rights and an innate sense of justice, to exercise their reason, claim their rights and act justly within a democratically organized society. We in the West have been supremely fortunate in having been given our fair chance of making the great experiment in self-government. Unfortunately it now looks as though, owing to recent changes in our circumstances, this infinitely precious fair chance were being, little by little, taken away from us. And this, of course, is not the whole story. These blind impersonal forces are not the only enemies of individual liberty and democratic institutions. There are also forces of another, less abstract character, forces that can be deliberately used by power-seeking individuals whose aim is to establish partial or complete control over their fellows. Fifty years ago, when I was a boy, it seemed completely self-evident that the bad old days were over, that torture and massacre, slavery, and the persecution of heretics, were things of the past. Among people who wore top hats, traveled in trains, and took a bath every morning such horrors were simply out of the question. After all we were living in the twentieth century. A few years later these people who took daily baths and went to church in top hats were committing atrocities on a scale undreamed of by the benighted Africans and Asiatics. In the light of recent history it would be foolish to suppose that this sort of thing cannot happen again. It can and, no doubt, it will. But in the immediate future there is some reason to believe that the punitive methods of I984 will give place to the reinforcements and manipulations of Brave New World."

Huxley initially points out that democracy as it once was, in the long golden period following Independence in 1776, delivered the goods. The monolithic tenants of the Constitution had only recently been formulated and were at that time entirely safe from the kind of revisions and attacks from Jewish shyster lawyers for whom the sight of a successful, prosperous and peaceful country was to become simply unacceptable.

Hard working European people, their strong, principled leaders and 24 karat gold governance based on openness, integrity, free speech, individual liberty and carefully-drafted legal framework guaranteed the stunning success of young America. It swiftly rose to become the world's richest and most powerful country thanks entirely to the vision of the founding fathers and the hard work, honesty and enterprise of the northern European settlers who built a paradise on earth the like of which the world had never before seen.

Obviously, we all know what has happened since and who exactly it is that is responsible for our collective demise. Huxley in his day correctly predicted that the age of the 'social engineer' was about to commence. Out of the two great dystopian paths, it was more likely that in the drive to gain total control of the masses, the forces of darkness would opt for subtle mind-manipulation rather than outright physical brutality. And for many decades, this was indeed the way of things.

However, whilst social engineering (such as political-correctness and massive immigration, the encouragement of inter-racial breeding and the destruction of the family unit (and through this, society as a whole) have been the core techniques for the implementation of these changes, we have lately seen very much more ruthless methods coming into play which if permitted to continue, will eventually see the infinitely more menacing methodology of Nineteen Eighty-Four coming to fruition.

In fact we have already seen Orwellian developments growing at a pace - since Washington's NeoConmen took the helm 8 years ago. Extraordinary rendition, torture, pre-empitive strikes, the silencing of dissenting voices, the massive increase in the prison population, the use of agencies like the ATF and their sibling clone agencies to act as stormtroopers against America's own citizens. The entire process is now taking on a far more baleful dimension. Legislation is already on the shelf which would - at a stroke - turn America into a clone of 1930s Stalinist Russia. And all that is required is one single precipitating event to bring this about...

We will not have long to wait, either. The trigger might be a genuine external threat, it may be another false flag operation, or it may come from America's repeated provocation of Russia. Either which way, when it happens (and it WILL - and soon) we will have our remaining (already weakened) rights whisked away in the blink of an eye. What happens next will not be pretty. Untold thousands of good men will die and our lives will never be the same again. Our freedoms will be history - at least for a while - and if we do not prevail, our children and their children will be slaves in perpetuity.

But you know what? Maybe we deserve such a future, for we did NOTHING to nip this situation in the bud when the possibility to seize our country back without bloodshed was within our grasp. Now it's probably too late, without considerable loss of life, to do so. Our collective inaction means that when the day of reckoning comes, we'll have a FAR higher price to pay because we didn't act at the outset. it all points to an unavoidable blood bath in which very many of us will perish. Such is the price of early inaction.



Huxley Warned US: Part 4
See the preamble from Part 1 if you haven't already.

The joke of modern 'democracy'...

Aldous Huxley, Brave New World Revisited, 1958:

"In a capitalist democracy, such as the United States, [the entire economic process] is controlled by what Professor C. Wright Mills has called the 'Power Elite.' This Power Elite directly employs several millions of the country's work force in its factories, offices and stores, controls many mil­lions more by lending them the money to buy its products and, through its ownership of the media of mass communication, influences the thoughts, the feelings and the actions of virtually everybody. To parody the words of Winston Churchill, never have so many been manipulated so much by so few. We are far indeed from Jefferson's ideal of a genuinely free society composed of a hierarchy of self ­governing units - 'the elementary republics of the wards, the county republics, the State republics and the Republic of the Union, forming a gradation of authorities.'

"We see, then, that modern technology has led to the con­centration of economic and political power, and to the development of a society controlled (ruthlessly in the total­itarian states, politely and inconspicuously in the democ­racies) by Big Business and Big Government. But societies are composed of individuals and are good only in so far as they help individuals to realize their potentialities and to lead a happy and fruitful life. How have individuals been affected by the technological advances of recent years? Here is the answer to this question given by a philosopher-psychiatrist, Dr Erich Fromm: 'Our contemporary Western society, in spite of its material, intellectual and political progress, is increasingly less conducive to mental health, and tends to undermine the inner security, happiness, reason and the capacity for love in the individual; it tends to turn him into an automaton who pays for his human failure with increasing mental sickness, and with despair hidden under a frantic drive for work and so­-called pleasure.' "

Well, nothing much has changed in the intervening 50 years, we can plainly see - save perhaps the intensity of this on-going manipulation.

Huxley correctly identifies that Big Government and Big Business are working hand-in-hand in a manner that brings nothing but ill for the broad mass of the population. Though purportedly working in OUR best interests, it is increasingly clear, even to those of little perception, that the government is doing quite the opposite and this outrageous state of affairs has been the norm for very many decades. Yet every few years, we shuffle like battery chickens into the polling booths in the delusion that our wishes and needs count for anything. We are simply rubber-stamping the authority of enemies who would happily throw our children into the jaws of ravenous wolves if it served their purposes. No one gets nominated for a shot at the presidency who isn't already pre-approved for the post by Jewish-controlled entities. Come November, we will be presented with the usual choice: a candidate who is slavishly pro-Israel (Obama) or one who is actively so (McCain). Either way, WE THE PEOPLE (for whom it's all supposed to be about) LOSE. Our democracy has been stolen. We get the last word; the final say; but it's meaningless because whoever wins, it's only ever another sock-puppet of Israel - then it's swiftly back to business as usual.


Huxley Warned Us: Part 3

In this 3rd part of this series on the predictions of Aldous Huxley, the great visionary bemoans the fact that in our increasingly overpopulated world, the people who constitute the principal component of the problem by producing the most children who will themselves go on to reproduce prodigiously; propagate poor quality genetic material and turn out huge numbers of biologically-inferior offspring. One can safely infer here that Huxley is referring to the Negro races. When you read the text below it leaves little room for doubt, in fact.

Common sense observations like this could be made freely 50 years ago at the time Huxley was writing, but just imagine the difficulty a professional person would encounter in re-iterating these simple truths today. They'd be branded as a Nazi or a eugenicist and God only knows what else. The result has been that the issue of differential breeding rates between the races and the population explosion cannot even be discussed! A time-bomb is ticking away that could eventually destroy the planet, yet political-correctness dictates we must remain silent on this, one of the most pressing of current issues.

Huxley, 1958:

"In the second half of the twentieth century, we do nothing systematic about our breeding; but in our random and unregulated way, we are not only overpopulating the planet, we are also, it would seem, making sure that these greater numbers shall be of biologically poorer quality. In the bad old days children with considerable, or even slight, hereditary defects rarely survived. Today, thanks to sanitation, modern pharmacology and the social conscience, most of the children born with hereditary defects reach maturity and multiply their kind. Under the conditions now prevailing, every advance in medicine will tend to be offset by a corresponding advance in the survival rates of individuals cursed by some genetic insufficiency. In spite of new wonder drugs and better treatment (indeed, in a certain sense, precisely because of these things), the physical health of the general population will show no improvement, and may even deteriorate. And along with a decline in average healthiness there may well go a decline in average intelligence. Indeed, some competent authorities are convinced that such a decline has already taken place and is continuing. 'Under conditions that are both soft and unregulated,' writes Dr W.H. Sheldon, 'our best stock tends to be out-bred by stock that is inferior to it in every respect ... It is the fashion in some academic circles to assure students that the alarm over differential birth-rates is unfounded; that these problems are merely economic, or merely educational, or merely religious, or merely cultural or something of the sort. This is Pollyanna optimism. Reproductive delinquency is biological and basic.' And he adds that 'nobody knows just how far the average IQ in this country (the USA) has declined since 1916, when Terman attempted to standardize the meaning of IQ 100."

In Phaedrus' opinion, the scientists who sit down and systematically analyze the result of various studies and reach conclusions which they KNOW will not be well received, must proclaim them honestly and fearlessly nevertheless. Not to do so would be a crime against Truth and another victory for the shadowy plotters behind the New World Order, AKA Jewish global domination and our continued, collective enslavement.


Huxley Warned Us: Part 2
Second in the series; to be read in conjunction with Phaedrus' Preamble of Part 1 published here on February 13.

Aldous Huxley:

"...Meanwhile impersonal forces over which we have almost no control seem to be pushing us all in the direction of the Brave New Worldian nightmare; and this impersonal pushing is being consciously accelerated by representatives of commercial and political organizations who have developed a number of new techniques for manipulating, in the interests of SOME MINORITY [my emphasis] the thoughts and feelings of the masses. The techniques of manipulation will be discussed in later chapters.

"For the moment let us confine our attentions to those impersonal forces which are now making the world so extremely unsafe for democracy, so very inhospitable to individual freedom. What are these forces? And why has the nightmare which I had projected into the [26th century], made so swift an advance in our direction? The answer to these questions must begin where the life of even the most highly civilized society has its beginnings - on the level of biology.

"On the first Christmas Day the population of our planet was about two hundred and fifty millions - less than half the population of modern China. Sixteen centuries later, when the Pilgrim Fathers landed at Plymouth Rock, human numbers had climbed to a little more than five hundred millions. By the time of the signing of the Declaration of Independence, world population had passed the seven hundred million mark. In 1931, when I was writing Brave New World, it stood at just under two billions. Today, only twenty-seven years later, there are two thousand eight hundred million of us. And tomorrow – what?"


Huxley's "tomorrow" is of course our today. And the current population of the world is (if I recall correctly) approximately six-and-a-half BILLION! In his sequel to Brave New World, Huxley goes on to describe how better and better drug treatments and cleaner water supplies and more effective disinfectants will only exacerbate the problem of gross human overpopulation (we'll see in detail what he has to say about this later). So when we read the widely-circulated reports about the agents of the New World Order planning to wipe out over 4 billion of us, perhaps we can see that there's some method in the madness, even though some of us reading these lines may be among the masses to be eliminated. Quite what the selection criteria for this future Cull comprise one can only speculate, as myself and others have done elsewhere.

However the fact remains that the world IS grossly overpopulated and far more precariously so now than when the aging Huxley observed it in 1958. In fact we are just starting to see now the onset of widespread food shortages he predicted elsewhere in BNWR. This has shown up in recent steeply rising food prices world-wide, and shortages of basic staples in places such as Africa and the far east. The author is also quite correct to refer to these mysterious forces as "impersonal" - for those behind them care not one jot about you or I, but only their own survival and enrichment. As we saw in Part 1, we have to wake up to the fact that our so-called 'leaders' are in fact our REAL enemies, and far more dangerous than any creation from their feverish collective imagination that they might, from time to time, conjure up to threaten us with.

Finally, note Huxley's supposed use of the term "some minority" in the first paragraph. I think we can all guess to whom he is referring here and I believe it is unlikely (having read much of the man) that he was quite so diplomatic in this original manuscript. However, the text we are studying here is sourced from the Random House edition of BNWR - and like most other publishing houses, Random House is totally owned and controlled by the Jews. I believe therefore that the temptation to tone down the original text was probably too much for them. Heaven knows how many other original manuscripts have been given the same treatment in the course of history in order to stifle the warnings they contain.


Huxley Warned Us: part 1
Preamble:

Aldous Huxley was one of the most outstanding visionaries of the 20th century. His predictions of the direction in which the world was heading have since been proven to be breathtakingly accurate. In 1932 Huxley penned his seminal masterpiece, 'Brave New World' - a novel depiction of a 'dystopian utopia' where the vast majority of the world's populace were genetically and socially-engineered slaves who labored quite contentedly in their ignorance, under the direction of a class of persons described as 'World Controllers' - an unelected elite who kept their underlings in willful subjugation via a combination of relentless subliminal propaganda, free sex, mindless, meaningless, undemanding entertainment and the distribution of a rewarding, 'feel-good' psychotropic drug.

This futuristic novel was set in the in the 26th century, by which time Huxley envisioned his predictions would most likely become reality. However, alarmed by the speed at which the dystopia he had described was coming to fruition, he was forced to accept that the likely arrival of Brave New World (for real) would in fact be much, much sooner than he had ever imagined. In1958 he wrote a sequel entitled: 'Brave New World Revisited'. In this reflective and recondite essay, he held up his prophecies to the transparent scrutiny afforded by the intervening 26 years of socio-political change. He concluded, much to his despair, that the nightmare world he had foreseen in the distant future was in reality "only just around the corner."

Now, fast-forward a further 50 years to 2008. Phaedrus herewith examines a series of extracts from Huxley's 1958 sequel to see exactly how far down the road to outright totalitarianism and slavish subservience we have traveled. The conclusions drawn are as alarming as one could possibly imagine and beg the questions: has a Brave New World been the agenda all along? Did Huxley merely PREDICT its inception? Or did he rather go no small way towards INSPIRING it? Perhaps some clues to this enigma will hopefully arise in the course of this series. Huxley wrote BNWR in the late 1950s - in a matter-of-fact style that was in those days refreshingly free from political-correctness. If you're queasy at the thought of Plain Truth, the best thing to do is shut down your computer and get back to Fox News. For everyone else, however, here we go with our first extract...

"...Omitted from the picture (not as being unimportant, but merely for convenience and because I have discussed them on earlier occasions) are the mechanical and military enemies of freedom - the weapons and gadgets which have so power­fully strengthened the hands of the world's rulers against their subjects, and the ever more ruinously costly preparations for ever more senseless and suicidal wars.

"The chapters that follow should be read against a background of thoughts about the Hungarian uprising and its repression, about the H-­bombs, about the cost of what every nation refers to as 'defense', about those endless columns of uniformed boys, white, black, brown, yellow, marching obediently towards the common grave..."

Much of the above requires no elaboration, but it is interesting to note that Huxley refers to weapons and gadgets that have strengthened the hands of the world's rulers AGAINST (their own) subjects. How much more true is this today than it was 50 years ago? I think we can safely say the drive towards subjugating the world's populations has continued unabashed. Out of a combination of apathy and ignorance, we have permitted this process to be carried out against us. We COULD have stood up against it, but we didn't. We were warned. We have no excuses. And now the situation is worse than ever, and shows no sign of any immediate improvement. If Americans put McCain in the White House, then expect a Draft to follow shortly afterwards and we can once again kiss another generation of our kids goodbye. Someone once said (I believe it was Jefferson) that "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." Regrettably, that price is one that collectively we have been unwilling to pay. In failing in our duty to ourselves and our children, therefore, we have created a situation in which the only way back to peace and normality is through bloody revolution, for it certainly cannot be achieved through the ballot box, as we all now know only too well, when the only voice of common sense and reason, Ron Paul, was quietly silenced by the crooked, Jew-controlled mainstream media.

Huxley Warned Us: parts 1 to 16 complete

In answer to the request from Kenny's Sideshow (great blog, guys) I'm reposting this series as I gather quite a lot of folks have also missed the odd part or two from their archives...

Huxley Warned Us: Part 16
This, the final part of our examination of the key points arising out of Huxley's dire prediction of the future contains a vital warning message for us all. Calling out to us from a half a century ago, the great visionary wrote:

"The methods employed by orthodox educators were and still are extremely inefficient. Under a scientific dictator education will really work - with the result that most men and women will grow up to love their servitude and will never dream of revolution. There seems to be no good reason why a thoroughly scientific dictatorship should ever be overthrown.

"Meanwhile there is still freedom left in the world. Many young people, it is true, do not seem to value freedom. But some of us still believe that, without freedom, human beings cannot become fully human and that freedom is therefore supremely valuable. Perhaps the forces that now menace freedom are too strong to be resisted for very long. It is still our duty to do whatever we can to resist them them."

But sadly we haven't. Everything that makes us what we are has been and continues to be spirited away from us little by little. 50 years after Huxley's strident warning, we've continued to permit this situation to develop through our indifference and collective apathy. We've been too preoccupied - as Huxley observed - with our "endless appetite for distractions" - which Baywatch actress has the biggest tits; Britney Spears' antics, the NFL rankings, blockbuster movies, must-have gadgets, Beyonce's ass, Gerry Springer, Rikki Lake and Oprah Winfrey. We've been hypnotized by all these media rodeo clowns while the Zionist bull was busy trashing our cultural china shop.

Our enemies, that is to say, the traitors who make our laws and broker deals with foreign powers behind our backs; who sell our liberties and hard-fought freedoms for 30 pieces of Jewish silver are all part of the same poison pot, to wit: newspaper proprietors, magazine editors, TV studio executives, movie producers, advertising agents, talk-show hosts, Marxists, internationalists, Jewish bankers, Senior Freemasons, CEOs of global corporations and the One World Government in waiting: the Bilderbergers, the Trilateralists, the CFRers, AIPAC and all the rest of the lying, scheming, cheating scum.

There are some very smart people in the above list, however, make no mistake about it. Whilst you and me have been drunkenly slurring in some seedy bar over who the Red Sox's best ever pitcher was, the agents of our destruction were slowly but surely drawing their plans against us (to paraphrase Wells). They have researched with exquisite detail all our foibles and failings. They are master manipulators par excellence. If we continue with our blind indifference to our approaching fate, then we'll have fully deserved it. Huxley's final conclusion in the lines quoted above is:

"There seems to be no good reason why a thoroughly scientific dictatorship should ever be overthrown."

Think about that stark assessment for a moment. It's perfectly correct. Once they've finally got us, they've got us for keeps. Us, our children and our children's children's children. They'll have completely re-written history by then. As a people, we won't know who we are any more. We'll be whatever THEY tell us we are. This revisionism - the only kind permitted it seems - has ALREADY been underway in the West for some time, as you may be aware. In due course we will become irreversibly enslaved by these criminals for all time to come - just as their 'holy' book foretells. As Huxley states, it simply won't occur to our grandchildren to question their subservience, but even if they were to, the Jews would have ALL the answers. I don't know about you, but as far as this blogger is concerned, that's a prospect that's worth fighting to the last drop of blood to prevent. I WILL NOT BETRAY MY CULTURAL HERITAGE.


Huxley Warned Us: Part 15
Brave New World Revisited, 1958:

"We see, then, that the disease of over-organization has been clearly recognized, that various comprehensive remedies have been prescribed and that experimental treatments of symptoms have been attempted here and there, often with considerable success. And yet, in spite of all this preaching and this exemplary practice, the disease grows steadily worse.
We know that it is unsafe to allow power to be concentrated in the hands of a ruling oligarchy; nevertheless power is in fact being concentrated in fewer and fewer hands. We know that, for most people, life in a huge modern city is anonymous, atomic, less than fully human; nevertheless the huge cities grow steadily huger and the pattern of urban-industrial living remains unchanged. We know that, in a very large complex society, democracy is almost meaningless except in relation to autonomous groups of manageable size; nevertheless more and more of every nation's affairs are managed by the bureaucrats of Big Government and Big Business. It is only too evident that, in practice, the problem of over-organization is almost as hard to solve as the problem of overpopulation. In both cases we know what ought to be done; but in neither case have we been able, as yet, to act effectively upon our knowledge."


This situation of over-organization to which Huxley constantly returns during the course of his work is no accident, but has in fact arisen by design. Organizational complexity is an absolute NECESSITY for the Jew to carry out his plans; his machinations would be readily exposed without it. One thing Jews hate above all else is EXPOSURE. Hitler put it almost poetically in Mein Kampf. The exact quote - though quite well known - eludes me at present, but suffice it to say that it perfectly describes how the Jews desire as many walls of opacity to work behind as they can possibly erect. So the more complex and confusing our world is, all the better for them to work their evil against us. This is one of the primary driving forces behind the advent of Big Government, which the Jews are always so keen to promote (at OUR expense of course).

Things have since unfortunately deteriorated beyond the point where the author's proposed solution would be of any help to us. It was a constructive suggestion 50 years ago perhaps, but is no longer applicable. We didn't take the necessary action when we should have. Our parents let us down just as we are now letting our own children down; consigning them to a life of slavery as a result of our indolence and apathy. For it is undeniably true that "an ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure" - it's less messy for one thing. We didn't make the effort in prevention, so our only remaining option now is to CURE and that will be a much uglier job.

I believe it's fitting at this point to conclude this section with an apposite quote from Winston Churchill:

"If you draft 10,000 regulations, you destroy all respect for the law."

Too many laws, too much complexity. What are we going to do about it?


Huxley Warned Us: Part 14
Aldous Huxley:

"'Free as a bird', we say, and envy the winged creatures for their power of unrestricted movement in all the three dimensions. But, alas, we forget the dodo. Any bird that has learned how to grub up a good living without being compelled to use its wings will soon renounce the privilege of flight and remain forever grounded. Something analogous is true of human beings. If the bread is supplied regularly and copiously three times a day, many of them will be perfectly content to live by bread alone - or at least by bread and circuses alone. 'In the end', says the Grand Inquisitor in Dostoevsky's parable, 'in the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, "Make us your slaves, but feed us. '"

Isn't this closely analagous to the situation we find ourselves in today? In this couch-potato society, It certainly strikes Phaedrus that way. Though we expect rather more from life than just bread three times a day, it isn't THAT much more. The vast majority of people in the West constitute little more than a mindless peasant underclass that has resigned itself to the treadmill of daily life. People work for 50 years just to put food on the table and keep a roof over their heads, from what little they have left after the ravages of direct and indirect taxation and Jewish investment frauds like pension schemes.

Throughout history, it has regrettably proven to be the case that the peasants - in whichever country - will undergo the most dire privations at the hands of their exploitative masters before they are driven into taking effective action to overthrow the tyranny and oppression from which they suffer. They can be ground down by decades of maltreatment and forced almost to the point of starvation before they will rise up and overturn the established order of things. So the situation we find ourselves in today is entirely of our own collective making. We have what we deserve.

Of course this despairing assessment isn't the whole story. We have a peasantry of so many hundreds of millions of people in the West because the common people are kept in the dark as to their true potential by the omnipresent, Jew-controlled media which is keen to foster in them the idea that the status quo is beyond question and it's simply the way things are and have always been. This is the vital importance of 'entertainment' in the modern world. Every single minute we spend watching some trashy TV soap or reading some garbage newspaper is a minute taxed from our lives. It is a minute during which we simply do not question why the world is in such a dreadful mess and who is responsible for it.

The mainstream jewsmedia performs the role of the rodeo clown with impeccable aplomb. TV networks have developed highly successful techniques for ensuring that once we are watching a channel, we will continue to do so for far longer than we had intended and for far longer than is good for us. They've moved on quite a bit since the days of 'Don't touch that dial!' And all the while we are gawping at their mind-rotting drivel, the Jews know we are no threat to them. If we are ever to liberate our peasant classes from their servitude of the Jew and Jewish interests, then we must find a way to break the media's hold over enough of them for the bulk to follow. In short, we need to work towards achieving a critical mass of Jew-awareness.


Huxley Warned Us: Part 13
From Brave New World Revisited, 1958:

"In practice, as recent history has repeatedly shown, the right to vote, by itself, is no guarantee of liberty. Therefore, if you wish to avoid dictatorship by plebiscite, break up modern society's vast, machine-like collectives into self-governing, voluntarily co-operating groups, capable of functioning outside the bureaucratic systems of Big Business and Big Government. Overpopulation and over-organization have produced the modern metropolis, in which a fully human life of multiple personal relationships has become almost impossible. Therefore, if you wish to avoid the spiritual impoverishment of individuals and whole societies, leave the metropolis and revive the small country community, or alternatively humanize the metropolis by creating within its network of mechanical organizations the urban equivalents of small country communities, in which individuals can meet and co-operate as complete persons, not as the mere embodiments of specialized functions."


Note here that even in the America of the late 1950s, the author was already deeply suspicious of democracy and how it could be subverted by the interests of Big Business. We tend to look back misty-eyed on that seemingly halcyon era from our present standpoint and see it as the golden age of liberty, but it is evident from Huxley's concerns that it was already under threat. My personal belief is that the origins of this erosion of our freedoms had its seeds in our accepting large numbers of Jews fleeing the Nazis from 1930's europe. Something seems to have happened within a few years of the ending of WWII that vastly accelerated the cultural decline that had been simmering away since the 1920s when the numbers of Jews in positions of public influence (Hollywood excepted) was much lower.

The Jews we were foolishly good-hearted enough to welcome to our shores repaid our kindness by proceeding to gnaw away at this once-great country from the inside. They quickly wriggled their way into powerful positions of public influence and seized control of the mass media, and by so doing, the government itself. They enriched themselves at our expense and funneled huge amounts of our tax-dollars to that cancerous, running sore of the Middle East, Israel. Additionally, their appetite for blood had to be satiated by the sacrifice of great numbers of our young people in fighting foreign adventures that were of no benefit to us whatsoever. But with their guile, their determination and their self-belief in their "entitlement" to call all the shots, they somehow got away with it – and still do.

I can almost hear the call of every great civilization in history crying out to America in the late 1930: "Please, please, don't let these Devils in! Afford them no sanctuary! They may look like you and talk like you - they're very good at that - but they're evil! You let them into your great country and within 100 years it'll be nothing but a rotting corpse. These parasites will have eaten away everything you have worked for and totally destroyed your wealth, your way of life and cultural heritage. We beg you from our bitter experience of 3,000 years of dealings with these nomadic parasites: slay them while you still may, for if you fail, then in time they will lay your country waste! Take heed, America! Take heed!"

Pity we couldn't hear them.


Huxley Warned Us: Part 12
Aldous Huxley:

"Under the relentless thrust of accelerating overpopulation and increas­ing over-organization, and by means of ever more effective methods of mind-manipulation, the democracies will change their nature; the quaint old forms - elections, parliaments, Supreme Courts and all the rest - will remain. The underlying substance will be a new kind of non-violent totalitarianism. All the traditional names, all the hallowed slogans will remain exactly what they were in the good old days. Democracy and freedom will be the theme of every broadcast and editorial ­but democracy and freedom in a strictly Pickwickian sense. Meanwhile the ruling oligarchy and its highly trained elite of soldiers, policemen, thought-manufacturers and mind-­manipulators will quietly run the show as they see fit."

Once again, time has proved the great visionary spot-on. The maintenance of these 'props of democracy' is simply a sham which purports to confer some legitimacy to what is wholly illegitimate. The US and many other Western countries are run on behalf of, and in the interests of, World Jewry. However it may appear and whatever our so-called 'leaders' tell us, that is what is ultimately behind the elaborate charade that democracy has become. The interests of you and me and our people count for nothing. We're just here to be taxed and to furnish them substance. Our so-called 'leaders' make promises they never keep just to get elected. Once elected, they get back to serving their true masters for their own naked self-enrichment and aggrandizement - and the rest of us can go to hell in a handbasket:

"How can we control the vast impersonal forces that now menace our hard-won freedoms? On the verbal level and in general terms, the question may be answered with the utmost ease. Consider the problem of overpopulation. Rapidly mounting human numbers are pressing ever more heavily on natural resources. What is to be done? Obviously we must, with all possible speed, reduce the birth rate to the point where it does not exceed the death rate. At the same time we must, with all possible speed, increase food production, we must institute and implement a world-wide policy for conserving our soils and our forests, we must develop practical substitutes, preferably less dangerous and less rapidly exhaustible than uranium, for our present fuels; and, while husbanding our dwindling resources of easily available minerals, we must work out new and not too costly methods for extracting these minerals from ever poorer and poorer ores - the poorest ore of all being sea water. But all this, needless to say, is almost infinitely easier said than done. The annual increase of numbers should be reduced. But how? We are given two choices - famine, pestilence and war on the one
hand, birth control on the other"

Of course the overpopulation problem has grown very much worse since Huxley wrote these words fifty years ago. A population reduction in the order of perhaps as much as 80% is now required. That's BILLIONS of people we're talking about. And this is what the agents of the NWO are secretively working towards. Clearly they're not interested in Huxley's birth control solution, as the flagrant encouragement of casual free sex and racial interbreeding in the popular media attests. That leaves us with famine, pestilence and war. No big surprise here! For a race of people that has always found the stench of rotting goyim flesh appealing, I think we could have seen it coming.

Phaedrus does not wish to appear like some Bible-thumping religious nut, but there is something disturbingly similar between Judaism and Satanism. Harold Rosenthal breezily admitted over 30 years ago (somewhat ill-advisedly in hindsight given the advent of the Internet) that the God of the Jews is actually Lucifer. When we see the works of these people given free reign, as in Palestine, it isn't difficult to form the view that there's something distinctly evil about them and their mindset. How the hell we permit such entities to have vast and over-arching influence in our day-to-day lives is one of world's great mysteries. THEY MUST BE STOPPED BEFORE THEY KILL US ALL.


Huxley Warned Us: Part 11
Aldous Huxley, 1958:

"Is individual freedom compatible with a high degree of individual suggestibility? Can democratic institutions survive the subversion from within of skilled mind-manipulators trained in the science and art of exploiting the suggestibility
both of individuals and of crowds? To what extent can the
inborn tendency to be too suggestible for one's own good or the good of a democratic society be neutralized by education?"


Critical questions indeed! To anyone listlessly surveying our contemporary scene of a half century later, it must appear at first sight that the battle for free thought and independent Will has already been lost. Such vast numbers of people appear to have permanently succumbed to the barrage of incessant propaganda that has crashed through our lives for so many decades. The masses really do appear to be completely brainwashed. However, we shall see that this bleak assessment is overly pessimistic by some considerable measure - thank God!

In Phaedrus' very extensive personal experience, the Politically-Correct quickly have their erroneous paradigm of the world shattered for good once confronted with the bare and unadulterated FACTS. The reason for this is that Politically-Correct dogma is grounded in falsehoods. It is a CONTRIVANCE. It is unable to stand up to any level of scrutiny and reason and quickly crumbles to pieces in the face of it. Thanking God, I can honestly state here that of the scores of persons I have confronted one-to-one personally, NOT A SINGLE ONE has left my presence still clinging to their former ideological baggage. NOT ONE!

It is remarkable but true. Notwithstanding the decades of non-stop propaganda through every conceivable Jewish-controlled medium both overt and subliminal; notwithstanding indoctrination by left-wing libertine perverts in our schools; notwithstanding lectures from appointees in our local and national government - notwithstanding all of this, the dogma of the United Nations, the politically-correct and the social engineers for all their exquisite research and ingenuity - for all that - the depth of penetration of this poisonous mindset on the average citizen is is little more than skin deep and as fragile as an eggshell!

I propose to go no further in this article to explain my favored technique for getting people to see sense (it was published here around last June and I will repost it again for those who cannot find it) as it is off-topic for this discussion on Huxley. Suffice it say here, that propaganda alone, unassisted by drugs, has never permanently damaged anyone's thinking beyond repair. Give me no more than one hour with 80% of people and I'll easily have them unplugged from the Matrix. But having said that, complacency will kill us. Though it IS a simple matter to free the minds of the people, this is dependent on us REACHING them in mass numbers. Until and unless we can get that vital message out, we still remain at grave risk of the permanent, blind enslavement Huxley foresaw:

"The nature of psychological compulsion is such that those who act under constraint remain under the impression that they are acting on their own initiative. The victim of mind-manipulation does not know that he is a victim. To him, the walls of his prison are invisible, and he believes himself to be free. That he is not free is apparent only to other people. His servitude is strictly objective." - AH.


Huxley Warned Us: Part 10
In this extract, Huxley addresses one of the Biggest Lies of the 20th Century - that all men are created equal.

Aldous Huxley, 1958:

"...The orgy of spying, lynching and judicial murder, which these wrong views about magic made logical and mandatory, was not matched until our own days, when the Communist ethic, based upon erroneous views about race, commanded and justified atrocities on an even greater scale. Consequences hardly less undesirable are likely to follow the general adoption of a Social Ethic, based upon the erroneous view that ours is a fully social species, that human infants are born uniform and that individuals are the product of conditioning by and within the collective environment. If these views were correct, if human beings were in fact the members of a truly social species, and if their individual differences were trifling and could be completely ironed out by appropriate conditioning, then, obviously, there would be no need for liberty and the State would be justified in persecuting the heretics who demanded it..."


Here the esteemed writer and visionary takes a distinct swipe against the founders of the United Nations. We have only this (presumably censored) Jewish version of his words from Random House Publishing to go by, but nevertheless it clear that Huxley had no time at all for Communist dogma and rounded repudiated it. It is only sad that we cannot study his original manuscript, for it is highly likely that he would have spelled out in no uncertain terms the inferior forms of life to which he merely alludes here in this 'sanitized version' - for it was written many years prior to the advent of political-correctness and has presumably been 'cleaned up' to avoid offense.

Huxley vehemently eschews the doctrine that all men would be equal in later life if they were each given the same opportunities from birth. Naturally, he tacitly refers to the Negro races here, to whose shortcomings Communism was intentionally blind. The UN/NWO official line is that all extended genetic phenotypes are essentially identical in all but superficial appearance. But we all - those of us in the REAL world that is - know as well as Huxley that there is a striking correlation between IQ and race, with the southern African Bantu coming out bottom of the pile. No amount of preferential, special schooling or 'positive discrimination' can make a silk purse out of a pig's ear. It's an uncomfortable FACT for our white Liberal friends that whilst nurture IS important, NATURE predominates and cannot be denied. A southern African Bantu (or one of its descendants now in Europe or America) can no more become an accomplished scientist, artist or writer, than can a mongrel puppy born in a stable can grow up a racehorse.

If we wish to learn the intrinsic capabilities of ANY race, we need merely to examine their cultural heritage; there's no need to make up stupid lies to pretend things are otherwise. The Negro, like the Jew and the Gypsy, have NOTHING to show for their much-vaunted cultures. They are all incapable of surviving by themselves. The Negroes are simply useless AT BEST, the Gypsies are mostly harmless but can be a dang nuisance at times, and the Jew..... Well, for the Jew I think we need a rather more exhaustive and intensive examination than this study of Huxley's prophecies allows!


Huxley Warned Us: Part 9
Aldous Huxley, 50 years ago in Brave New World Revisited:

"...That a dictator could, if he so desired, make use of [certain psychotropic chemicals] for political purposes is obvious. He could ensure himself against political unrest by changing the chemistry of his subjects' brains and so making them content with their servile conditions. He could use tranquillizers to calm the excited, stimulants to arouse enthusiasm in the indifferent, hallucinants to distract the attention of the wretched from their miseries.

"But how, it may be asked, will the dictator get his subjects to take the pills that will make them think, feel and behave in the ways he finds desirable? In all probability it will be enough merely to make the pills available. Today alcohol and tobacco are available, and people spend considerably more on these very unsatisfactory euphorics, pseudo­stimulants and sedatives than they are ready to spend on the education of their children."

We now know from secret experimental data released by Russia following a series of experiments carried out in the 1960s that adding fluoride to water supplies in concentrations of as little as 1ppm induces in subjects enhanced levels of susceptibility and compliance - a very useful tool indeed for any wayward government. Our so-called 'leaders' are still toying with the idea of introducing it into our drinking water on the grounds of improving dental health, notwithstanding that its psychotropic effects are becoming increasingly known.

So the big question is: could the dental health motive have been a mere pretext all along? Given that the discussion over fluoride remains on-going long after its mind-altering properties have been publicized, it seems quite likely. If there is one thing Huxley told us that we must never forget it is that our real enemies in the West are our governments. They are infinitely more dangerous to us than all the world's disparate terrorist groupings put together. Do we really know what they're injecting our kids with? Could there be more to it than simple vaccination?


Huxley Warned Us: Part 8
In Part 7, we were able to see how blanket control over the media had enabled the Jews to become the only game in town when it came to dissemination of information and that the alphabet soup of TV channels on offer that suggest the availability of free choice is simply an illusion. Virtually ALL the networks are pushing forward the NWO agenda by promoting the idea that free-trade, globalization and mass movements of peoples between countries is a Good Thing which brings jobs and prosperity. And whilst we dive headlong into embracing this cultural suicide, the really big gainers, as always, are the Jews. By acting as intermediaries, agents and obstacles between parties in international trade (a core business of this parasite going back Millenia) they can ALWAYS make a good living, regardless of how impoverished those poor fools competing for ever worsening living standards consequently become.
Huxley, 1958:

"In the West, democratic principles are proclaimed and many able and conscientious publicists do their best to supply electors with adequate information and to persuade them, by rational argument, to make realistic choices in the light of that information. All this is greatly to the good. But unfortunately propaganda in the Western democracies above all in America, has two faces and a divided personality. In charge of the editorial department there is often a democratic Dr Jekyll - a propagandist who would be very happy to prove that John Dewey had been right about the ability of human nature to respond to truth and reason. But this worthy man controls only a part of the machinery of mass communication.


"In charge of advertising we find an anti-democrat because anti-rational, Mr Hyde - or rather a Doctor Hyde, for Hyde is now a Ph.D. in psychology and has a master's degree as well in the Social Sciences. This Dr Hyde would be very unhappy indeed if everybody always lived up to John Dewey's faith in human nature. Truth and reason are Jekyll's affairs, not his . Hyde is a Motivation Analyst, and his business is to study human weaknesses and failings, to investigate those un­conscious desires and fears by which so much of men's conscious thinking and overt doing is determined. And he does this, not in the spirit of the moralist who would like to make people better, or of the physician who would like to improve health, but simply in order to find out the best way to take advantage of their ignorance and to exploit their irrationality for the pecuniary benefit of his employers."


Here again, Huxley re-affirms his conviction that the mass media is working AGAINST the best interests of the people. His 'Dr. Hyde' character is alive and with us in the West today, too. Yet since we are now 50 years down the road from when Huxley penned his observations, the new Dr. Hyde of today has infinitely more techniques for deception in his armory. Fifty years of endless studies into what makes people tick in the most microscopic areas of their lives has yielded hundreds of thousands of documents and reports detailing every gleanable fact from the human psyche and how it may be ruthlessly and cynically manipulated to ensure that the naked greed of the Jew is to some extent at least satiated. And all this goes on with the full backing of Western governments, the leaders of which have become phenomenally wealthy for their tacit assistance in selling out the true interests of the people. So much for 'democracy.' So much for 'public service.'


Huxley Warned Us: Part 7
Aldous Huxley, 1958:

"Mass communication, in a word, is neither good nor bad; it is simply a force and, like any other force, it can be used either well or ill. Used in one way, the press, the radio and the cinema are indispensable to the survival of democracy. Used in another way, they are among the most powerful weapons in the dictator's armory. In the field of mass communications as in almost every other field of enterprise, technological progress has hurt the Little Man and helped the Big Man. As lately as [1910], every democratic country could boast of a great number of small journals and local newspapers. Thousands of country editors expressed thousands of independent opinions. Somewhere or other almost anybody could get almost anything printed.

"Today the press is still legally free; but most of the little papers have disappeared. The cost of wood-pulp, of modern printing machinery and of syndicated news is too high for the Little Man. In the totalitarian East there is political censorship, and the media of mass communication are controlled by the State. In the democratic West there is economic censorship and the media of mass communication are controlled by members of the Power Elite. Censorship by rising costs and concentration of communication-power in the hands of a few big concerns is less objectionable than State ownership and government propaganda; but certainly it is not something of which a Jeffersonian democrat could possibly approve.

"In regard to propaganda, the early advocates of universal literacy and a free press envisaged only two possibilities: the propaganda might be true, or it might be false. They did not foresee what in fact has happened, above all in our Western capitalist democracies - the development of a vast mass communications industry, concerned in the main neither with the true nor the false, but with the unreal, the more or less totally irrelevant. In a word, they failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions."


Here we are, half a century on and this situation has, as one might reasonably expect, grown worse still. There was always some element of propaganda in Western media, even pre-Huxley, but it was nothing as remotely unremitting and omnipresent as it is today. Governments and large media organizations (increasingly one and the same entity) could have used their influence to bring about a better society, but they chose, by accident or design, to do the opposite. And the only place where genuine freedom of expression yet survives in on the Internet - and that may not be for very much longer if the powers that be have their way.

The media of today serves - almost without exception - the interests of 'Big Business' with its free trade and globalization agenda; selling out the interests of hard-working people for the VAST self-enrichment of what Huxley calls the 'Power Elite'. Eye-wateringly large sums are made by big business interests (read "Jews") which have asset-stripped this nation and others on an epic scale. The demise of the manufacturing heartlands of the northern midwest attest to this. Ruin, decay, family breakdown, drugs and crime have replaced ordered and prosperous communities. This is all solely due to the Jews' internationalist, borderless world where decent Americans are forced to compete with Chinese peasants and the like who sell their labor for little more than a bowl of rice a day.

The advertising element of the popular media has gotten totally out of control, too. Rather than satisfying consumers' genuine needs and desires as was once the case, it has become a dragon of a business model that festers on our worst fears and anxieties. We no longer buy useful products or services because we NEED them, we buy junk, mass-produced garbage by the shed-load in order to prove to our friends and neighbors that we're 'doing well' and have a 'comfortable lifestyle.' Every advertisement screams out to us that we're missing out on something; if we don't constantly and wantonly consume, there must be something fundamentally wrong in our lives.

Advertising media attempts to make us feel rotten and inadequate and instills in us a a sense of permanent dissatisfaction with every aspect of our existence. The impetus from this form of madness comes from the craven greed of a race of beings who can NEVER have enough and don't care what damage they do in going after it. The American dream was never about having a driveway stuffed full of sports utility vehicles. It was never about having a glamor model for a wife. It was never about taking 4 holidays a year. It was never about having a widescreen TV in every room spewing out its garbage. It was never about so much stuff that the Jews have convinced us, through their stranglehold over the mass media, is what we should be striving for.

If we could only break away from this madness, en-masse, and adopt the kind of lifestyle advocated by the likes of Emerson and Thoreau, the Tribe of Satan would be out of business in a flash. They'd never make a single cent out of us, just as they can't make a penny out of the Amish community. Maybe one day soon when the dollar collapses to Absolute Zero and folks wake up to the reality of the lies, the distortions, the fraud and deceit that's been perpetrated against us for decades, there'll come a realization that all the junk that the Jews told us was so desirable and indispensable wasn't worth jack. Then perhaps we can re-establish this broken, fucked-up society along decent lines. Until that happy day, keep those guns oiled.


Huxley warned Us: Part 6

Aldous Huxley writing in 'Brave New World Revisited' exactly 50 years ago:

"Jefferson said: 'If a nation expects to be ignorant and free
it expects what never was and never will be ... The people cannot be safe without information. Where the press is free, and every man able to read, all is safe.'"

He continues:

"Across the Atlantic another passionate believer in reason was thinking, about the same time, in almost precisely similar terms. Here is what John Stuart Mill wrote of his father, the utilitarian philo­sopher, James Mill: 'So complete was his reliance upon the influence of reason over the minds of mankind, whenever it is [attention-grabbing] distractions of the most fascinating nature are deliberately used as instruments of policy, for the purpose of preventing people from paying too much attention to the realities of the social and political situation.

"The other world of religion is different from the other world of entertainment; but they still resemble one another in being most decidedly 'not of this world'. Both are distractions and, if lived in too continuously, both can become, in Marx's phrase, 'the opium of the people' and so a threat to freedom. Only the vigilant can maintain their liberties, and only those who are constantly and intelligently on the spot can hope to govern themselves effectively by democratic procedures.

" A society, most of whose members spend a great part of their time not on the spot, not here and now and in the calculable future, but somewhere else, in the irrelevant other worlds of sport and soap opera, of mythology and metaphysical fantasy, will find it hard to resist the encroachments of those who would manipulate and control it."

Consider for a moment the incisive nature and power of this simple observation. Huxley at once within one and the same sentence correctly identifies the fundamental reasons behind the way we live today: a disingenuous, Jew-controlled media, an utterly corrupted government, and the masses of idle, ignorant, gullible propaganda-consumers.

Thankfully, you and I, Gentile reader, are not among this class of the intellectually impoverished. We have awoken to the threats that surround us. We are wise to the motivations of those behind it. It is our DUTY to ensure everyone else is likewise made aware of exactly what has been going on now for many decades. The only 'free press' today is the Internet. Out the Liars and murderers! To hell with them! Expose them all!



Huxley Warned Us: Part 5

Aldous Huxley, 1958:

"No people that passes abruptly from a state of subservience under the rule of a despot to the completely unfamiliar state of political independence can be said to have a fair chance of making democratic institutions work. Again, no people in a precarious economic condition has a fair chance of being able to govern itself democratically. [true freedom] flourishes in an atmosphere of prosperity and declines as declining prosperity makes it necessary for the government to intervene ever more frequently and drastically in the affairs of its subjects. Overpopulation and over-organization are two conditions which, as I have already pointed out, deprive a society of a fair chance of making democratic institutions work effectively. We see, then, that there are certain historical, economic, demographic and technological conditions which make it very hard for Jefferson's rational animals, endowed by nature with inalienable rights and an innate sense of justice, to exercise their reason, claim their rights and act justly within a democratically organized society. We in the West have been supremely fortunate in having been given our fair chance of making the great experiment in self-government. Unfortunately it now looks as though, owing to recent changes in our circumstances, this infinitely precious fair chance were being, little by little, taken away from us. And this, of course, is not the whole story. These blind impersonal forces are not the only enemies of individual liberty and democratic institutions. There are also forces of another, less abstract character, forces that can be deliberately used by power-seeking individuals whose aim is to establish partial or complete control over their fellows. Fifty years ago, when I was a boy, it seemed completely self-evident that the bad old days were over, that torture and massacre, slavery, and the persecution of heretics, were things of the past. Among people who wore top hats, traveled in trains, and took a bath every morning such horrors were simply out of the question. After all we were living in the twentieth century. A few years later these people who took daily baths and went to church in top hats were committing atrocities on a scale undreamed of by the benighted Africans and Asiatics. In the light of recent history it would be foolish to suppose that this sort of thing cannot happen again. It can and, no doubt, it will. But in the immediate future there is some reason to believe that the punitive methods of I984 will give place to the reinforcements and manipulations of Brave New World."

Huxley initially points out that democracy as it once was, in the long golden period following Independence in 1776, delivered the goods. The monolithic tenants of the Constitution had only recently been formulated and were at that time entirely safe from the kind of revisions and attacks from Jewish shyster lawyers for whom the sight of a successful, prosperous and peaceful country was to become simply unacceptable.

Hard working European people, their strong, principled leaders and 24 karat gold governance based on openness, integrity, free speech, individual liberty and carefully-drafted legal framework guaranteed the stunning success of young America. It swiftly rose to become the world's richest and most powerful country thanks entirely to the vision of the founding fathers and the hard work, honesty and enterprise of the northern European settlers who built a paradise on earth the like of which the world had never before seen.

Obviously, we all know what has happened since and who exactly it is that is responsible for our collective demise. Huxley in his day correctly predicted that the age of the 'social engineer' was about to commence. Out of the two great dystopian paths, it was more likely that in the drive to gain total control of the masses, the forces of darkness would opt for subtle mind-manipulation rather than outright physical brutality. And for many decades, this was indeed the way of things.

However, whilst social engineering (such as political-correctness and massive immigration, the encouragement of inter-racial breeding and the destruction of the family unit (and through this, society as a whole) have been the core techniques for the implementation of these changes, we have lately seen very much more ruthless methods coming into play which if permitted to continue, will eventually see the infinitely more menacing methodology of Nineteen Eighty-Four coming to fruition.

In fact we have already seen Orwellian developments growing at a pace - since Washington's NeoConmen took the helm 8 years ago. Extraordinary rendition, torture, pre-empitive strikes, the silencing of dissenting voices, the massive increase in the prison population, the use of agencies like the ATF and their sibling clone agencies to act as stormtroopers against America's own citizens. The entire process is now taking on a far more baleful dimension. Legislation is already on the shelf which would - at a stroke - turn America into a clone of 1930s Stalinist Russia. And all that is required is one single precipitating event to bring this about...

We will not have long to wait, either. The trigger might be a genuine external threat, it may be another false flag operation, or it may come from America's repeated provocation of Russia. Either which way, when it happens (and it WILL - and soon) we will have our remaining (already weakened) rights whisked away in the blink of an eye. What happens next will not be pretty. Untold thousands of good men will die and our lives will never be the same again. Our freedoms will be history - at least for a while - and if we do not prevail, our children and their children will be slaves in perpetuity.

But you know what? Maybe we deserve such a future, for we did NOTHING to nip this situation in the bud when the possibility to seize our country back without bloodshed was within our grasp. Now it's probably too late, without considerable loss of life, to do so. Our collective inaction means that when the day of reckoning comes, we'll have a FAR higher price to pay because we didn't act at the outset. it all points to an unavoidable blood bath in which very many of us will perish. Such is the price of early inaction.



Huxley Warned US: Part 4
See the preamble from Part 1 if you haven't already.

The joke of modern 'democracy'...

Aldous Huxley, Brave New World Revisited, 1958:

"In a capitalist democracy, such as the United States, [the entire economic process] is controlled by what Professor C. Wright Mills has called the 'Power Elite.' This Power Elite directly employs several millions of the country's work force in its factories, offices and stores, controls many mil­lions more by lending them the money to buy its products and, through its ownership of the media of mass communication, influences the thoughts, the feelings and the actions of virtually everybody. To parody the words of Winston Churchill, never have so many been manipulated so much by so few. We are far indeed from Jefferson's ideal of a genuinely free society composed of a hierarchy of self ­governing units - 'the elementary republics of the wards, the county republics, the State republics and the Republic of the Union, forming a gradation of authorities.'

"We see, then, that modern technology has led to the con­centration of economic and political power, and to the development of a society controlled (ruthlessly in the total­itarian states, politely and inconspicuously in the democ­racies) by Big Business and Big Government. But societies are composed of individuals and are good only in so far as they help individuals to realize their potentialities and to lead a happy and fruitful life. How have individuals been affected by the technological advances of recent years? Here is the answer to this question given by a philosopher-psychiatrist, Dr Erich Fromm: 'Our contemporary Western society, in spite of its material, intellectual and political progress, is increasingly less conducive to mental health, and tends to undermine the inner security, happiness, reason and the capacity for love in the individual; it tends to turn him into an automaton who pays for his human failure with increasing mental sickness, and with despair hidden under a frantic drive for work and so­-called pleasure.' "

Well, nothing much has changed in the intervening 50 years, we can plainly see - save perhaps the intensity of this on-going manipulation.

Huxley correctly identifies that Big Government and Big Business are working hand-in-hand in a manner that brings nothing but ill for the broad mass of the population. Though purportedly working in OUR best interests, it is increasingly clear, even to those of little perception, that the government is doing quite the opposite and this outrageous state of affairs has been the norm for very many decades. Yet every few years, we shuffle like battery chickens into the polling booths in the delusion that our wishes and needs count for anything. We are simply rubber-stamping the authority of enemies who would happily throw our children into the jaws of ravenous wolves if it served their purposes. No one gets nominated for a shot at the presidency who isn't already pre-approved for the post by Jewish-controlled entities. Come November, we will be presented with the usual choice: a candidate who is slavishly pro-Israel (Obama) or one who is actively so (McCain). Either way, WE THE PEOPLE (for whom it's all supposed to be about) LOSE. Our democracy has been stolen. We get the last word; the final say; but it's meaningless because whoever wins, it's only ever another sock-puppet of Israel - then it's swiftly back to business as usual.


Huxley Warned Us: Part 3

In this 3rd part of this series on the predictions of Aldous Huxley, the great visionary bemoans the fact that in our increasingly overpopulated world, the people who constitute the principal component of the problem by producing the most children who will themselves go on to reproduce prodigiously; propagate poor quality genetic material and turn out huge numbers of biologically-inferior offspring. One can safely infer here that Huxley is referring to the Negro races. When you read the text below it leaves little room for doubt, in fact.

Common sense observations like this could be made freely 50 years ago at the time Huxley was writing, but just imagine the difficulty a professional person would encounter in re-iterating these simple truths today. They'd be branded as a Nazi or a eugenicist and God only knows what else. The result has been that the issue of differential breeding rates between the races and the population explosion cannot even be discussed! A time-bomb is ticking away that could eventually destroy the planet, yet political-correctness dictates we must remain silent on this, one of the most pressing of current issues.

Huxley, 1958:

"In the second half of the twentieth century, we do nothing systematic about our breeding; but in our random and unregulated way, we are not only overpopulating the planet, we are also, it would seem, making sure that these greater numbers shall be of biologically poorer quality. In the bad old days children with considerable, or even slight, hereditary defects rarely survived. Today, thanks to sanitation, modern pharmacology and the social conscience, most of the children born with hereditary defects reach maturity and multiply their kind. Under the conditions now prevailing, every advance in medicine will tend to be offset by a corresponding advance in the survival rates of individuals cursed by some genetic insufficiency. In spite of new wonder drugs and better treatment (indeed, in a certain sense, precisely because of these things), the physical health of the general population will show no improvement, and may even deteriorate. And along with a decline in average healthiness there may well go a decline in average intelligence. Indeed, some competent authorities are convinced that such a decline has already taken place and is continuing. 'Under conditions that are both soft and unregulated,' writes Dr W.H. Sheldon, 'our best stock tends to be out-bred by stock that is inferior to it in every respect ... It is the fashion in some academic circles to assure students that the alarm over differential birth-rates is unfounded; that these problems are merely economic, or merely educational, or merely religious, or merely cultural or something of the sort. This is Pollyanna optimism. Reproductive delinquency is biological and basic.' And he adds that 'nobody knows just how far the average IQ in this country (the USA) has declined since 1916, when Terman attempted to standardize the meaning of IQ 100."

In Phaedrus' opinion, the scientists who sit down and systematically analyze the result of various studies and reach conclusions which they KNOW will not be well received, must proclaim them honestly and fearlessly nevertheless. Not to do so would be a crime against Truth and another victory for the shadowy plotters behind the New World Order, AKA Jewish global domination and our continued, collective enslavement.


Huxley Warned Us: Part 2
Second in the series; to be read in conjunction with Phaedrus' Preamble of Part 1 published here on February 13.

Aldous Huxley:

"...Meanwhile impersonal forces over which we have almost no control seem to be pushing us all in the direction of the Brave New Worldian nightmare; and this impersonal pushing is being consciously accelerated by representatives of commercial and political organizations who have developed a number of new techniques for manipulating, in the interests of SOME MINORITY [my emphasis] the thoughts and feelings of the masses. The techniques of manipulation will be discussed in later chapters.

"For the moment let us confine our attentions to those impersonal forces which are now making the world so extremely unsafe for democracy, so very inhospitable to individual freedom. What are these forces? And why has the nightmare which I had projected into the [26th century], made so swift an advance in our direction? The answer to these questions must begin where the life of even the most highly civilized society has its beginnings - on the level of biology.

"On the first Christmas Day the population of our planet was about two hundred and fifty millions - less than half the population of modern China. Sixteen centuries later, when the Pilgrim Fathers landed at Plymouth Rock, human numbers had climbed to a little more than five hundred millions. By the time of the signing of the Declaration of Independence, world population had passed the seven hundred million mark. In 1931, when I was writing Brave New World, it stood at just under two billions. Today, only twenty-seven years later, there are two thousand eight hundred million of us. And tomorrow – what?"


Huxley's "tomorrow" is of course our today. And the current population of the world is (if I recall correctly) approximately six-and-a-half BILLION! In his sequel to Brave New World, Huxley goes on to describe how better and better drug treatments and cleaner water supplies and more effective disinfectants will only exacerbate the problem of gross human overpopulation (we'll see in detail what he has to say about this later). So when we read the widely-circulated reports about the agents of the New World Order planning to wipe out over 4 billion of us, perhaps we can see that there's some method in the madness, even though some of us reading these lines may be among the masses to be eliminated. Quite what the selection criteria for this future Cull comprise one can only speculate, as myself and others have done elsewhere.

However the fact remains that the world IS grossly overpopulated and far more precariously so now than when the aging Huxley observed it in 1958. In fact we are just starting to see now the onset of widespread food shortages he predicted elsewhere in BNWR. This has shown up in recent steeply rising food prices world-wide, and shortages of basic staples in places such as Africa and the far east. The author is also quite correct to refer to these mysterious forces as "impersonal" - for those behind them care not one jot about you or I, but only their own survival and enrichment. As we saw in Part 1, we have to wake up to the fact that our so-called 'leaders' are in fact our REAL enemies, and far more dangerous than any creation from their feverish collective imagination that they might, from time to time, conjure up to threaten us with.

Finally, note Huxley's supposed use of the term "some minority" in the first paragraph. I think we can all guess to whom he is referring here and I believe it is unlikely (having read much of the man) that he was quite so diplomatic in this original manuscript. However, the text we are studying here is sourced from the Random House edition of BNWR - and like most other publishing houses, Random House is totally owned and controlled by the Jews. I believe therefore that the temptation to tone down the original text was probably too much for them. Heaven knows how many other original manuscripts have been given the same treatment in the course of history in order to stifle the warnings they contain.


Huxley Warned Us: part 1
Preamble:

Aldous Huxley was one of the most outstanding visionaries of the 20th century. His predictions of the direction in which the world was heading have since been proven to be breathtakingly accurate. In 1932 Huxley penned his seminal masterpiece, 'Brave New World' - a novel depiction of a 'dystopian utopia' where the vast majority of the world's populace were genetically and socially-engineered slaves who labored quite contentedly in their ignorance, under the direction of a class of persons described as 'World Controllers' - an unelected elite who kept their underlings in willful subjugation via a combination of relentless subliminal propaganda, free sex, mindless, meaningless, undemanding entertainment and the distribution of a rewarding, 'feel-good' psychotropic drug.

This futuristic novel was set in the in the 26th century, by which time Huxley envisioned his predictions would most likely become reality. However, alarmed by the speed at which the dystopia he had described was coming to fruition, he was forced to accept that the likely arrival of Brave New World (for real) would in fact be much, much sooner than he had ever imagined. In1958 he wrote a sequel entitled: 'Brave New World Revisited'. In this reflective and recondite essay, he held up his prophecies to the transparent scrutiny afforded by the intervening 26 years of socio-political change. He concluded, much to his despair, that the nightmare world he had foreseen in the distant future was in reality "only just around the corner."

Now, fast-forward a further 50 years to 2008. Phaedrus herewith examines a series of extracts from Huxley's 1958 sequel to see exactly how far down the road to outright totalitarianism and slavish subservience we have traveled. The conclusions drawn are as alarming as one could possibly imagine and beg the questions: has a Brave New World been the agenda all along? Did Huxley merely PREDICT its inception? Or did he rather go no small way towards INSPIRING it? Perhaps some clues to this enigma will hopefully arise in the course of this series. Huxley wrote BNWR in the late 1950s - in a matter-of-fact style that was in those days refreshingly free from political-correctness. If you're queasy at the thought of Plain Truth, the best thing to do is shut down your computer and get back to Fox News. For everyone else, however, here we go with our first extract...

"...Omitted from the picture (not as being unimportant, but merely for convenience and because I have discussed them on earlier occasions) are the mechanical and military enemies of freedom - the weapons and gadgets which have so power­fully strengthened the hands of the world's rulers against their subjects, and the ever more ruinously costly preparations for ever more senseless and suicidal wars.

"The chapters that follow should be read against a background of thoughts about the Hungarian uprising and its repression, about the H-­bombs, about the cost of what every nation refers to as 'defense', about those endless columns of uniformed boys, white, black, brown, yellow, marching obediently towards the common grave..."

Much of the above requires no elaboration, but it is interesting to note that Huxley refers to weapons and gadgets that have strengthened the hands of the world's rulers AGAINST (their own) subjects. How much more true is this today than it was 50 years ago? I think we can safely say the drive towards subjugating the world's populations has continued unabashed. Out of a combination of apathy and ignorance, we have permitted this process to be carried out against us. We COULD have stood up against it, but we didn't. We were warned. We have no excuses. And now the situation is worse than ever, and shows no sign of any immediate improvement. If Americans put McCain in the White House, then expect a Draft to follow shortly afterwards and we can once again kiss another generation of our kids goodbye. Someone once said (I believe it was Jefferson) that "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." Regrettably, that price is one that collectively we have been unwilling to pay. In failing in our duty to ourselves and our children, therefore, we have created a situation in which the only way back to peace and normality is through bloody revolution, for it certainly cannot be achieved through the ballot box, as we all now know only too well, when the only voice of common sense and reason, Ron Paul, was quietly silenced by the crooked, Jew-controlled mainstream media.