Come and See at comeandhear.com - the uncensored Talmud online!

Students of Jewish theology will warmly welcome the sterling efforts of the good ol' boys and girls at www.comeandhear.com - something more than just a website, where everyone can now download their very own personal copy of the foremost English language translation of the Jews' holy book, the Talmud. And not just the juicy bits about non-Jews being no better than cattle and fit only for eternal slavery, either! Nope, the C&H on-line Talmud covers the broader scope of this most controversial source of Jewish religious law, too. The Talmud is notorious among observers of the Jewish Problem for its vitriolic 'hate-speak' towards non-Jews, but there's also a lot of common-sense wisdom in it, too that maybe the rest of us can apply in our daily lives (inter-racial relationships being a total no-no, for example).

Come and Hear cite their inspiration behind the project as the 'British' Chief Rabbi, Jonathan Sachs. For years now, Sachs has been calling for greater understanding between religious groupings as a means of diffusing anti-Semitism and Islamophobia. Sachs has persistently contended that if only people knew the TRUTH about Judaism, anti-Semitism would quickly die out. He has consistently promoted what he calls "inter-faith dialog" as a means to get the truth out there to folks. Come and Hear have heard his call and gone one better by placing all this material on the Web so we can read it for ourselves! Therefore no need for the likes of Sachs to be put to the trouble of "explaining and interpreting" Jewish law for us. Well what did Sachs expect? That we'd simply ASK him what Judaism is really all about? With all due respect to Sachs, his tribe aren't best suited to telling the truth so the very idea was ludicrous! Come and Hear offers by far the best solution for the would-be Jewish scholar.

Friends, I urge you to visit the site, check out the resources there. Download your own free personal copy of the Babylonian Talmud, burn copies of it to CD, redistribute it to your friends, and if you feel suitably motivated, mirror the site yourselves as the folks at C&H are quite happy for you to do. Check it out today! www.comeandhear.com

How they´ll sucker us into a North American Union

I'm sure the agents behind the Jewish Agenda don't need any suggestions from a humble goy like Phaedrus to help them turn Americans on to the concept of the North American Union, so here's a guide for the rest of us (the plebs, the proles, the sheeple) as to how we can expect them to try to sell us on the idea. In order to do this, they'll have to contrive a macro-scale scenario in which such a move appears to be clearly and unquestionably the only sensible option open.

So It will be consequently necessary to provide some powerful impetus for economic, monetary and political union between Mexico, the US and Canada. This is being strategically engineered even as I write, by collapsing the value of the US dollar. First we had a methodically-engineered era of all-too-cheap credit. This was followed by the inevitable house-price boom and consequent bust. Then the resulting credit crunch. Phase 1 thereby completed successfully. Full marks to the banksters.

Next, something had to be done about the dire liquidity shortage in the markets and of course - ensuring that the banking system didn't fail no matter what the cost to the American people might be. Massive reflationary measures were undertaken: massive cuts in interest rates, huge public spending announcements and bank-bailouts financed by printing more dollars - and a tax hand-back on top! Note this is all at a time when commodity prices around the world have been soaring - and therein lies the smoking gun of economic sabotage for all to see: vigorous reflation whilst prices are ALREADY rising is economic madness of a scale we have never seen before.

Now 'they' are telling us the worst is over! Unfortunately it isn't, however - and 'they' know it! We now commence the super-inflationary stage, dear friends. Inflation is caused by 'too much money chasing too few goods' according to the classic definition. It boils down to paper money becoming worth less and losing its spending power as a consequence of too much of it being in circulation. In essence, the amount of food, clothing, fuel etc., which we can buy with our bucks grows less and less. As this process continues, the value of the US Dollar will increasingly approach that of the Peso.

Now it's important to know that the Dollar and the Peso needn't reach a 1:1 parity for a currency union to work. This is a popular misconception. When corporation A merges with corporation X of equal capital valuation, it is highly likely that their valuations will APPEAR totally different at first sight due to their respective share prices. The cover price is illusory and only gives an idea of the corporation's underlying value when multiplied by the number of shares in circulation and debt is then subtracted from the resulting product.

We could see the Peso declared suitable to merge with the Canadian and US dollars at 1:5, 1:10, or 1:1000 WE simply have no way of knowing what the TRUE value of the Peso actually IS, any more than we know what the greenback is really worth. Thank God we have super-smart Jewish bankers to do the sums for us or we'd be completely lost! Without them out there, batting for us, such a MASSIVE merger between three large countries could cost us all TRILLIONS!

On the other hand, considering what happened with Europe's single currency, precise valuation might not be so critical at all. Europe's leaders abandoned TRUE economic and monetary convergence in the interests of political expediency. The pressure 'from above' for a political Union in Europe was so intense that the economies involved in the project were not properly harmonized. This singular failure provides proof positive that the whole business of political union has NOTHING to do with economic prosperity for the people, but rather EVERYTHING to do with TOTAL CONTROL of more and more of the world's territory.

So how will they pitch the idea to us? It doesn't take much imagination to figure out. It´ll be a combination of fear and inducement - but overwhelmingly FEAR. For a bit of humor, here's a quirky look at how Bush or his successor might go about it:

"My fellow north Armenians,

"The recent economic turmoil and our embarrassing, abject failure to ride it out as we were once able to do before I took office, constitute a harsh wake-up call to us all that we can no longer survive as independent nations any longer in a world increasingly dominated by vast trading blocks like the EU, the AU, ASEAN and those slit-eyed yellow bastards in China and Taiwan.

"This world moves fast and we are being increasingly left behind due to our inherently insular nature; marginalized in fact, by international events. All around the planet, smaller nations are forging pacts with one another and by so doing, are enjoying an increasingly dominant position in world markets and along with that, enhanced clout politically, too. Ladies and Gennulm'n! We on this continent are losing our voice in this world and there's only one way to regain it!

"We simply MUST remain competitive or die. If we do not take similar steps here in our part of the world; if we do not immediately form a similar Union here in north America between the US, Canada and Mexico to defend our industries and our jobs and our standard of living, we stand to slip to 3rd world status in terms of economic power in as little as 20 years from now. Yes, my friends, the situation really is that grave.

"I plead with you to share my vision of a North American Union: a place in which jobs, prosperity and a golden future for EVERYONE will replace the old chaos, decline and decay of the past 20 years for which Bill Clinton and my dad can justifiably be blamed! By mutually embracing our three, great, not-so-very-different cultures, we can assert our position as top dog in the world! No longer will our elderly have to dissipate their life savings just in staying alive! Everything will be cheaper! Wages will be higher!

"No longer will you have to queue to see a doctor - and worse yet, pay good money to see him/her! No longer will our black folks have to suffer the indignity of trying to pay for liquor, lottery tickets and cigarettes at gas stations with food stamps! The highest quality public schooling for ALL - and NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND TO LOOK STUPID even if it means keeping the rest in school for 40 years! As a strong, forward-looking Union of ONE people, we WILL be able to afford these programs! Ladies and Gennulm'n, I urge you from the bottom of my heart to vote YES to Proposition 666 and set in motion the steps needed to begin formalizing the NAU as a matter of the very greatest urgency!"

Buddy, can you spare an Amero?

Firstly, I'm not saying the intentional and pre-planned depreciation of the dollar is NECESSARILY being carried out to facilitate the creation of a North American Union, but it sure is a useful policy plank that could WELL be being pursued for this very reason! Phaedrus feels it's entirely apposite to point out that what has been going on in the Treasury recently COULD certainly have its roots in the NWO's quest for a new Union (on the path to eventual World Union) in which three separate and distinct countries become one, with all that entails for us.

We now know without doubt that Bush wants us to submerge our sovereignty with Canada and Mexico and that the resulting political, economic and monetary union will require some significant re-alignment in the values of the three currencies currently in existence. Now, no three separate countries have identical economies, so 'harmonization' (nice sounding word for something very unpleasant)in the values of the US and Canadian dollar with the Mexican Peso is something we WILL see starting to occur if we ARE heading down the road to such a full-blown marriage.

How do we know this? From the recent experience of our friends in Europe, of course! The same forces are in the driving seat there as well as here. The bulk of European countries since 2001 have adopted the Euro, which is a complex composite of the various former currencies of those participating countries. In order for them all to be assimilated into one unitary currency, Europe had to go through a lengthy period of economic convergence - as we shall have to here, too, for the plan to work across north America.

It'll be a simpler matter here, though. Only 3 economies to converge rather than over 20 as was the case of Europe. It can be achieved very much more quickly. It is Mexico's Peso that is the main problem for Bush & Co. It's quite far away in terms of value from both the other Dollars. For currency and economic convergence to succeed, one could either somehow strengthen the Peso, or else weaken the other two. Or more subtly perhaps, a bit of both by means of capital transfer payments to Mexico under some pretext or other.

It is manifestly clear that the Fed is sinking the Dollar on purpose, and eventual political Union would be my personal hunch as to the underlying reason. I don't believe Greenspan's attempt to get the Arab states to ditch the Dollar recently was him turning traitor against his former masters. He's still 100% committed to a One World Government just like the rest of his Illuminati brethren. Breaking the Dollar peg with oil and other commodities leading to a crash in the value of our currency is a 'great strategy' towards this goal which can hardly fail.

I imagine Americans will be far less opposed to kissing the Dollar goodbye once it's no longer considered a reserve currency and it becomes worth Jack. That will make pushing through the Union very much easier. And of course this new Superstate will require a new Constitution! It MUST do. Can you take a guess at who'll be drafting it, my friends? What do you imagine it's going to say about freedom of speech and the right to keep and bear arms? Do you think your rights and freedoms as a citizen of this brave new land and your family's quality of life will be enhanced as a result? Well...?

Next week there'll be a sequel to this item and, we'll be exploring the ways in which 'our leaders' will most likely try to persuade us a Union with Canada and Mexico is not only in our best interest, but absolutely essential for our very survival. Stay tuned to World Peace!

How Jews Think

HOW THE JEW THINKS

A Special Report for “Real Jew News”

By Brother Nathanael Kapner…Street Evangelist!

HAVING GROWN UP AS A JEW and having gone to an upper middle class synagogue throughout my childhood up through my young adult years, I am uniquely qualified to do an expose on the inner workings of the Jewish mind. Now that I am an Orthodox Christian, having converted in 1971 to Christianity, I can see very clearly how the Jew thinks:

1. The Jew sees himself as a “Jew First.” In any nation that the Jew may reside in, he is an “American Second;” or a “Frenchman Second; etc. – for the Jew is always a “Jew First.” Thus the Jew puts his interest first before national interests.

2. The Jew promotes secularism in any nation he may reside in. This works to his benefit. For the Jew fears nothing more than a Christian World View which has at its root the absolutism of Christianity over all other faiths as being false religions including Judaism. But the Jew believes that Judaism is the only true religion and it is his province alone. For the Jew looks upon the Gentiles, the “Goyim,” as being inferior to him.

3. The Jew uses the indictment of “Anti Semitism,” to prevent any criticism of his conduct, his ideas, and his agenda.

4. The Jew is hell bent on his self-preservation. Though American and European Jews love the good life, they promote Zionism, in order that they will always have a place to escape to.

5. The Jew would like to see the New Testament destroyed, defamed, discarded, and mocked. For in it contains the historical record of the Jewish leaders committing Deicide against the Eternal Son of God Who became man for our salvation, the Lord Jesus Christ. The Jew wishes to eradicate this historical fact for it places him in a position as having to repent, an act that the Jew finds repulsive.

6. The Jew though he may be “non religious,” still honors the rabbis as having final authority on all religious questions and matters. The rabbis have as their authority the Talmud which contradicts the Old Testament and blasphemes Jesus Christ, the Virgin Mary, and Christians.

7. The Jew may promote “equality amongst men,” yet he sees himself in a self conscious ethnic group that he considers as being superior to all others.

8. The Jew when confronted with the claims of Christianity will always reply, “I was born a Jew and I will die a Jew.” What he means is, “I will never become a Christian like the dumb goys.”

9.The Jew loves to be in control. The Jew loves to be at the top of the ladder. If Christianity were again to be in predominance in America, the Jew would be horror-struck. For then he will have the finger pointed at him that he is a Christ denier, a stubborn, stiff-necked hater of Jesus Christ, and a supporter of the Jews Who brought Christ to Pilate to have Him crucified.

10.The Jew will use every means possible to undermine Christianity in whatever nation he may reside. He will always cry, “Look what they did to us!” as if he is an innocent lamb without any faults. But whenever someone shows why they “did this to them,” he shouts back, “You’re an Anti Semite!”

11. The Jew has divorced from his mind all spiritual hopes of the next world. The Jew sees his continuity in his progeny so to carry on his name in this earthly and material existence.

12. The Jew lives for this world not for the world to come. The Jew is therefore a crass materialist.

13. The Jew, though “non religious,” gives tacit compliance to the vision of their rabbis who foresee an earthly messiah who will establish a messianic kingdom in which the Jews will be the supreme heads of the nations.

14. The Jew does not like to perform manual labor. To make money the Jew is dependent on the labors of others. Therefore the Jew is primarily to be found in the service professions: whether financial, academic, medical, legal, mercantile, journalistic, or entertainment.

15. The Jew in the financial realm hopes to have all capital beneath his control. The Jew strives to get the possession of riches without industry on his part.

16. The Jew, in order to attain financial power, views Christianity, with its attendant moral influence, as a threat. For profligacy, dissolute manners, and perversion of sexual mores, places the Gentile, the “Goy” under his dominion.

17. The Jew in the academic realm strives to educate according to his Jewish World View. The Jewish World View is the unspoken perception that the Gentiles, the “Goyim,” are ultimately his enemies.

18. The Jew, therefore, who operates in the academic realm, will educate the “Goyim” to believe that the Jew has been an innocent victim of Gentile enmity throughout the centuries. Thus a certain level of obligation is inculcated into the “Goyim” toward the Jew - that he is deserving of deferential treatment.

19. The Jew who operates in the journalistic realm, which today is his total control of the Press, presents current events in favour of the Jew.

20. The Jew, who operates in the journalistic realm, which today is total control of all Media, presents Christianity in a bad light. This works to his benefit. For Christianity confers strength and moral fiber to the Gentile population, which the Jew wants under his dominion.

21. The Jew is a perpetual “outsider.” The Jew is a ceaseless “observer” and consequent “actor” upon the world’s stage. The Jew seeks to impose his will upon the Gentile whom he looks down upon as being inferior in intelligence and activism to him.

22. The Jew is always on a “mission.” The Jew always has a “cause” he must fight for. The “mission” and the “cause” of the Jew is hostile to the “mission” and “cause” of Jesus Christ and Christianity.

23. The Jew wishes to remain aloof and separate from the nations. That is why Winston Churchill initially used the term, “The International Jew.”

24. The Jew holds himself separate from the nations, not primarily for ideological reasons as prescribed in the Old Testament. Rather, the Jew remains aloof from all others because he sees himself as belonging to an “elite.”

25. The Jew may proclaim and propagandize though his monopoly of the Media the slogan, “Diversity Is Our Strength!” Yet the Jew will never live in a neighborhood where poor Blacks, Asians, and Hispanics live. Why not? Because the Jew despises working class folk as being culturally inferior to him and socially impotent.

26. The Jew at heart despises the ideal of the “Brotherhood of Man.” For it is only through acceptance of Jesus Christ, the Christian Church, and the Christian Universal vision of the “new man in Christ” that the “Brotherhood of Man” can be realized.

27. The Jew wants nothing to do with Jesus Christ, the Church, and the Christian Universal vision of the “new man in Christ.” Why not? First because Jesus Christ calls all men to repent which the Jew finds repulsive; Second because the Church with its eyes set on the kingdom to come is disagreeable to the Jew who seeks a kingdom of this world; Third because the “new man in Christ,” whereby all elitist distinctions are dissolved, is an identity the Jew finds repugnant to his love of “separateness” and control over others.

28. The Jew, through his monopoly of the Media, the Judicial System, and Academia, wars against Christianity. Why? Because Christianity indicts the Jew as being unrepentant. This puts the Jew in a position of weakness and beholden to the dictates of the Christian. The Jew considers this the greatest of all calamities.

29. The Jew falsely believes that he is part of the “chosen people.” Thus the Jew deems that he has the “divine right” to have his “rights” implemented and secured. In fact, the Jew with his yiddishee “chutzpah” demands this. What are the Jew’s “rights” as he perceives them? First and primarily, that the world around him should conform to his point of view and to his point of view only.

30. The Jew will ignobly hold on to his identity unto death. To die for the truth rather for one’s “identity” is a valid martyrdom. But “truth” for the Jew is not in the realm of absolutes. “Truth” for the Jew is to assert and impose his will upon others. And what is the Jew’s will? That Jesus Christ is not be loved, believed in, and
worshiped.


–
+Brother Nathanael…Street Evangelist! @
http://www.brothernathanael.com/

URGENT APPEAL! To Canadian Civil Liberty Groups -- Intervene in the Lemire Constitutional Challenge

Source: NFtW:

URGENT APPEAL!

To Canadian Civil Liberty Groups -- Intervene in the Lemire Constitutional Challenge

http://www.freedomsite.org /legal/april30-08_letter_to _civil_liberties.html

The dates for the final arguments in the Richard Warman case against Marc Lemire under section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act have now been set. Written arguments must be filed in M ay and oral arguments will be held before the Tribunal in June.

Marc Lemire has challenged the constitutionality of s. 13 of the CHRA as a violation of freedom of expression, freedom of the press, freedom of conscience. A pdf of the written argument can be found > here <.

This case will set a crucial precedent in the fight against section 13! We need support from civil liberties associations!

The dates for the final arguments in the Richard Warman case against Marc Lemire under section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act have now been set. Written arguments must be filed in May and oral arguments will be held before the Tribunal in June.

Marc Lemire has challenged the constitutionality of s. 13 of the CHRA as a violation of freedom of expression, freedom of the press, freedom of conscience. A pdf of the written argument can be found here.

This case will set a crucial precedent in the fight against section 13! We need support from civil liberties associations!

Message from Marc Lemire:

There is time for the civil liberties and journalist associations in Canada to join this fight and to intervene on the side of freedom in this precedent-setting case. I have written to the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, the BC Civil Liberties Association, PEN Canada and the Canadian Association of Journalists urging them to intervene as interested parties in my case so that they can support the constitutional challenge. My letter is copied below.

I need the Internet community and the blogoshere to contact these organizations and let them know that this case is going to be the most important precedent regarding freedom of speech and the Internet for years to come. Will they be there? Will they lend their expertise and weight to the side of free speech NOW? No other person has challenged the constitutionality of section 13.

This is our chance to strike this law down as a law that no democracy can justify.

Please write to the associations and urge them to stand up NOW against the tyranny of section 13. If not now, when?

THE CANADIAN CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION

A. ALAN BOROVOY, GENERAL COUNSEL

506 - 360 Bloor Street West

Toronto, ON M5S 1X1

phone: 416-363-0321

fax: 416-861-1291

e-mail: mail@ccla.org

http://www.ccla.org/

PEN Canada

24 Ryerson Avenue., Suite 301

Toronto ON M5T 2P3

Canada

(416)703-8448

http://www.pencanada.ca

The Canadian Association of Journalists

Algonquin College

1385 Woodroffe Avenue, B224

Ottawa, ON K2G 1V8

Telephone 613-526-8061

Fax: 613-521-3904

http://www.caj.ca/

Letter from Marc Lemire to Civil Liberties Associations

April 29, 2008

Canadian Civil Liberties Association

506 - 360 Bloor Street West

Toronto, ON M5S 1X1

Fax: 416-861-1291


Constitutional Challenge – request to intervene in case

Dear Canadian Civil Liberties Association,

My name is Marc Lemire and on 25 November 2005, my legal counsel filed a Constitutional Challenge of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act. Section 13 is the totalitarian provision that gives the Canadian Human Rights Commission the ability to censor material on telephone lines and computer networks (such as the Internet).

Your organization has recently come out publicly against Section 13, and now is the time to join the battle. If not now… when?

The Constitutional Challenge I have filed is questioning the validity, substance and application of the law, and is not about my case. I am asking that you intervene only on the validity of the law, in the context of the Charter challenge that my counsel has filed. As it stands now, that intervention on the charter challenge, would only be written arguments on the constitutionality of Section 13.

The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal have been given the authority to rule on the constitutionality of it’s own enabling legislation. So that’s where the real fight over the validly of Section 13 of the CHRA has to take place.

Your organizations has decried the use and abuse of Section 13 to attack writers and journalists such as Mark Steyn, Ezra Levant and Macleans Magazine, and now is the only time such a challenge will be heard.

No other case will ever have the factual background as this case. World-renown experts have testified, like Dr. Michael A Persinger from Laurentian University, and Dr. Donald Downs from the University of Wisconsin . As well, through the testimony of three CHRC employees subpoenaed by the respondent, the entire investigative process, lack of training and utter contempt of free speech have been laid bare. In one case, Dean Steacy a senior investigator for the CHRC said that “Freedom of speech is an American concept, so I don't give it any value”.

CHRC investigators have admitted under oath, that they used fake names and pseudonyms to post on White Nationalist websites such as Stormfront, VNN , BC White Pride, etc. As well as other sites such as the largest conservative chat site in Canada – FreeDominion.ca.

The CHRC has also admitted to withholding those crucial facts from every respondent and even the Tribunal, and only recently changed their policy after they were called before the Federal Court of Canada to gave up their Section 37 (Canada Evidence Act) claims to withhold disclosure of the identities they used.

To date their has been 26 hearing days, spanning four cities in Ontario . Including, Toronto , Ottawa , Mississauga and Oakville . Currently, seven groups have received interested party status. This is the biggest challenge Section 13 has ever under gone, and your organizations intervention in this case is paramount.

Interest in Case:

The media has been very interested in this case, and even the National Post’s Editorial Board has publicly declared their support for this constitutional challenge and a repeal of Section 13.

Groups and Writers that Support Repeal of Section 13:

Liberal MP Keith Martin

Liberal MP Dan McTeague

Conservative MP James Rajotte

Ezra Levant

Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (Rex Murphy)

Catholic Insight Magazine

Catholic Register

Halifax Chronicle Herald (Paul Schneidereit)

Victoria News


PEN Canada

CDN Association of Journalists

Mary Steyn (Macleans Magazine)

Calgary Herald

Western Standard Magazine

London Free Press

B'nai Brith Jewish Tribune

Sask Leader-Post

Deborah Gyapong

Calgary AM770


Globe and Mail

National Post

David Warren (Ottawa Citizen)

Eye Magazine ( Toronto )

Toronto Star

Toronto Sun

Interim Magazine

Sault Ste. Marie – SooToday

Winnipeg Free Press

Oak Bay News

The Canadian Human Rights Commission is drunk with power and wants to limit the freedom of many Canadians. Since the inception of the law, over 100 complaints have been accepted against Canadians. Every single person who has ever been before the Tribunal has lost. That’s a 100% “conviction” rate for respondents. Truth and intent are NO defence!

Recently the Rights Enforcers at the Canadian Human Rights Commission have attacked:

* Maclean Magazine & Mark Steyn (Rogers Publishing Ltd)
* Christian Heritage Party and it’s leader Ron Gray (Federally registered Political Party)
* Freedominion (Conservative website)
* Prometheus Institute (runs the Peace Earth and Justice News website) (Complaint over commentary on Isreal)
* Bruce Allen (Mr. Allen is music talent manager who represents a number of popular Canadian musicians including Bryan Adams and Michael Buble)

The Constitutional Challenge of Section 13

This case is the definitive challenge of the censorship provisions of the Canadian Human Rights Act, and cases before the Federal Court of Canada have been stayed pending the decision in my case. The National Post Editorial Board, and editor Johnathan Kay has called me a “principled free-speech martyr” and is supporting a repeal of Section 13.

To date, 7 parties have received interested party status before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. These include:

· The Federal Attorney General of Canada

· Canadian Human Rights Commission

· Canadian Free Speech League

· B’nai Brith Canada

· Simon Wiesenthal Centre

· Canadian Association for Free Expression

· Canadian Jewish Congress

In support of freedom of speech and the Constitutional Challenge I have called as expert witnesses:

Dr. Donald Downs: Professor of Political Science, Law and Journalism at the University of Wisconsin , Madison . He has written four previous books, including Nazis in Skokie: Freedom, Community, and the First Amendment, winner of the Anisfield-Wolf Book Award and The New Politics of Pornography, winner of the Gladys M. Kammerer Award of the American Political Science Association. Professor Downs has also published extensively in leading journals, encyclopedias and professional books, lectured throughout the US and in England and Scotland , and made numerous media appearances on radio and television to discuss issues of American politics and law.

Dr. Michael Persinger: Full Professor of Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience at Laurentian University. Since 1987 has been a registered Psychologist in Ontario , specializing in: Neuropsychology and Personality Assessments, with secondarily specialization in Psychometric Family Assessments. Dr. Persinger has written seven books and written/contributed to over 200 scientific articles and journals. He is well recognized as an expert the world over. Since 1983 has been the Coordinator of Behavioral Neuroscience Program at Laurentian University. Dr. Persinger has appeared on “NOVA”, ABC's “20/20", ABC’s “NightLine,” “60 Minutes” ( Australia ), “That's Incredible,” “48 Hours” (CBS), Unsolved Mysteries, The Discovery Channel, UltraScience, MTV News Special, The Unexplained, CNN News, NBC News, The Learning Channel, Arts and Entertainment Channel, Japanese T.V. among others.

Bernard Klatt: Internet and computer expert. Has been in the computer industry since 1970. Has worked for multinational corporations like Digital Equipment, General Electric and Philips-Signetics. Owner of Fairview Technology Centre, an Internet Service Provider in British Columbia .

Just to give you an insight into the mentality that permeates the Canadian Human Rights Commission, read the testimony of Dean Steacy. He is the lead investigator at the CHRC on internet cases (Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act)

MS KULASZKA: Mr. Steacy, you were talking before about context and how important it is when you do your investigation. What value do you give freedom of speech when you investigate one of these complaints?

MR. STEACY: Freedom of speech is an American concept, so I don't give it any value.

MS KULASZKA: Okay. That was a clear answer.

MR. STEACY: It's not my job to give value to an American concept.

Warman v. Lemire Transcripts, Volume 21, Page 4793 (2007/05/10)

During the course of the Constitutional Challenge we called evidence on every single Section 13 case that has ever been heard, to document the systemic bias used to both investigate and accept Section 13 cases.

This is the best chance to overturn Section 13, and remove the censorship provisions of the Act. What I am asking for is for your organization to intervene on the motion submitted on the constitutionality of Section 13. The tribunal has ruled that submissions for this will be in writing. This would be a written motion on how you view Section 13 and it’s chilling effect of silencing people and how it covers personal and private communication on the Internet or a “group of connected computers.” Which could mean intranet, private computer networks, as well as corporate intranets would be subject to censorship at the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

The process you would need to do is as follows:

1. Contact the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal and request to be an Interested Party on the Constitutional Challenge of Section 13.

TRIBUNAL FILE:


T1073/5405

STYLE OF CAUSE:


Richard Warman v. Marc Lemire

2. The tribunal will ask you to submit a motion to grant interested party status.

3. After receiving interested party status, you will file a final submission on the validity of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act.

Stephen Harper (Conservative Party Leader, and Prime Minister of Canada ):

"Human Rights Commissions, as they are evolving, are an attack on our fundamental freedoms and the basic existence of a democratic society…It is in fact totalitarianism. I find this is very scary stuff."

(BC Report Newsmagazine, January 11, 1999)

You need to contact:

Canadian Human Rights Tribunal

160 Elgin Street

11th Floor

Telephone: 613 995-1707

Fax: 613 995-3484

Registry Officer from Human Rights Tribunal

Name: Carol Ann Hartung

Relevant law on Interested Parties:

http://www.chrt-tcdp.gc.ca /about/download/rules-regles -04.htm

I hope this can answer some of the questions you had on the constitutional challenge and assist you in making a decision on intervening on this very important case for privacy and freedom of speech. With 26 hearing days and numerous expert witnesses, this case is clearly not about me, but rather about Section 13 of the

Canadian Human Right Act , and the decision if the CHRC should indeed be put in charge of making judgment on political and religious material and penalize those who are found guilty.

Full transcripts of this case are in electronic format (Adobe PDF) and I can send them to you on request. The 11 CHRT rulings to date, are available online the CHRT website.

Attached to this letter is a copy of the Constitutional Challenge of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act.

If I can be of any assistance, please contact me at (416) 709-5140, or my legal counsel – Barbara Kulaszka, at (613) 475-3150.

-Marc Lemire

Email: marc@lemire.com

Canada’s Mainstream media on the CHRC









At times in Canada , it's been the Catholics, the Jehovah's Witnesses, trade unionists, Communists and gays whose views were thought beyond the pale. Today, it's people like Lemire. … The CHRC has censored Canadians long enough. It should be confined to dealing with discrimination. And, if someone must play cops and robbers, let it be the real police, under the criminal code, not some guide to what's politically correct today.

Calgary Herald | Human rights body oversteps by playing undercover game | March 29, 2008

Canada's power-grabbing human rights commissioners evidently have scant regard for the freedoms they suppress or for the original understanding of the codes they are supposed to uphold.

London Free Press | Freedom of the press attacked | December 8, 2007

For more than twenty years, in this column and elsewhere, I have been writing against the human rights commissions, which have quasi-legal powers that should be offensive to the citizens of any free country. They are kangaroo courts, in which the defendant's right to due process is withdrawn. They reach judgments on the basis of no fixed law. Moreover, “the process is the punishment” in these star chambers -- for simply by agreeing to hear a case, they tie up the defendant in bureaucracy and paperwork, and bleed him for the cost of lawyers, while the person who brings the complaint, however frivolous, stands to lose nothing.

Ottawa Citizen | Suing for silence | December 9, 2007

Nonetheless, even in this craven environment, Canada 's "human rights commissions" are uniquely inimical to the marketplace of ideas. In its 30 years of existence, no complaint brought to the federal HRC under Section XIII has been settled in favor of the defendant. A court where the rulings only go one way is the very definition of a show trial. These institutions should be a source of shame to Canadians.

Macleans Magazine | Here's what offends this writer | January 3, 2008





“…when Lemire faces off against representatives of the Canadian Human Rights Commission (HRC) on Tuesday, I will be rooting for him — and so will thousands of other Canadians…”

National Post | Jonathan Kay | March 24, 2008

Human rights commissions are obsolete bodies whose moment has passed. That they can be exploited by a narrow lobby seeking to impose its doctrine upon other

Canadians is a serious problem.

Calgary Herald | Shut down the human rights commissions | December 20, 2007

The liberticidal monster should have been strangled at birth -- but better late than never. By now Human Rights Commissions are populated with officials who speak disparagingly of "fundamentalist liberals" and describe free speech as an "American idea" with no weight in this country. They're dragging magazine and writer into their rank dragon's den for allegedly suggesting that Islamic culture is incompatible with Canada 's liberalized, Western civilization.

George Jonas | Turning out the lights on liberalism | December 20, 2007

“And to say the CHRC's section 13 thought crimes case against Marc Lemire has backfired is an understatement. Not only have his counterattacks blown the lid of the CHRC's corrupt tactics, such as their practise of posting anonymous, bigoted messages online, but their illegal hacking into a private citizen's Internet account has now attracted the scrutiny of Canada 's Privacy Commissioner.”

Ezra Levant | http://www.EzraLevant.com

For years, Canadians have averted their eyes to the sort of shenanigans going on at our nation's human-rights commissions under the theory that any means used toward such a noble end as "human rights" must somehow be justified. What we saw this week turns that conceit into a pathetic joke.

National Post | Jonathan Kay | March 27, 2008






“But even if the CHRC nails Lemire, Tuesday's eight-hour hearing will still be remembered as a landmark disaster for the commission. Despite efforts by Steacy and others to stonewall on specific questions of CHRC procedure, observers were nonetheless able to extract a fairly detailed picture of work practices at the Commission. The impression that emerges is an overstaffed shop in which bored, unionized desk jockeys sit around "investigating" obscure web sites in search of some scrap of actionable hatred. And when they don't find anything actionable, they try to stir things up by logging in and participating under their own house alias — a practice Lemire describes as a form of entrapment.”

National Post | Jonathan Kay | March 27, 2008

http://www.StopSection13.com

The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal

Active and Past cases: 46 | Cases the tribunal ruled on: 37

· NOT A SINGLE respondent have ever won a section 13 case
· 98% of cases have poor or working class respondents

FUCK OFF, HILLARY IT´S OVER ALREADY!

'Hill the Shill' must be getting really desperate! Imagine having to appeal for support among white folks of all people!

Source: Western Voices

Item begins...

Suddenly white people count

Defeated Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton has finally reached the bottom of her ammunition box, demanding that the Democratic "super delegates" ignore her repeated (and huge) caucus and primary defeats and back her plan to steal the presidential nomination from Barack Obama at the Denver convention in August. Why? Because, suddenly, white people matter.

"I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on," she told a reporter for USA TODAY, brandishing an Associated Press article, which, she said, "found how Senator Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again, and how whites in both states who had not completed college were supporting me. There's a pattern emerging here." In Clintonspeak, that means those bitter blue collar rednecks who cling to guns and religion and dabble in xenophobia aren't going to vote for the black guy come November.

Clinton continued: "These are the people you have to win if you're a Democrat in sufficient numbers to actually win the election. Everybody knows that."

"Hard-working Americans, white Americans"? "These people"? How are the mighty fallen! Needless to say, the blogosphere (along with the old media) is going crazy with the news.

Clinton, whose whole career has been based on antiwhite political correctness, booted Geraldine Ferraro from her campaign for saying much less. But the wiliness of the Clintons is the stuff of legend and knows no shame.

For months Hillary's campaign has attempted to paint Barack Obama obliquely as "the black candidate," while still cynically hoping to attract black votes. Some observers have even claimed that the Hillary campaign purposely threw the early South Carolina primary, dominated as the state is by black Democrats, in order to drive home the racial point to blue collar whites as well as to hispanics, who, cognizant of the stakes in protected class racial politics, have remained wary of having a black president.

White people of Hillary's class have little to no negative experience with affirmative action. How sweet it is to see her now, finally, feel something of the pain white working people have been made to suffer while being ignored by powerful whites like Hillary and her husband. Perhaps this woman, whose only "qualification" is to have been the wife of "America's first black president," should consider the consequences of the bitter fruit she, and the ideology she represents, helped to sow.

The only downside to seeing Hillary being forced to beg white people for support on racial grounds like this, along with the very public and open self destruction of the Democrats on racial lines, is that there is no workable alternative in 2008. The open borders madman John McCain is at least just as bad as Hillary or Barack Obama. But McCain and his fellow conservative sellouts haven't yet learned the lesson Hillary is now getting a crash course in. Many whites will vote for McCain viscerally as the white candidate, but that kind of blind support is drying up, fast. Nature hates a vacuum, and sellouts on both sides of the aisle should dread the day white people in America finally find the will and program to fill it.

One World Government: a Recipe for Endless War

Only a first degree neophyte to the 'conspiracy world' that bloggers like Phaedrus and others inhabit would today remain skeptical over the claim that the driving force behind most governments around the world is Unionization in whatever form. The steady co-alaising of country to country, trading bloc to trading bloc, region to region, hemisphere to hemisphere, and finally the ultimate goal: Global Unity - a stateless planet with only one border: that around Israel where the Self-Chosen People will live out their sun-drenched days in glorious, idle splendor at everyone else's expense, just as their holy book foretells. Oh, by the way, if you ARE a neophyte of any degree, we´re referring here to the Jewish people!

If you think these words fanciful and far-fetched, then you really haven't been paying attention to what is going on in America, Europe and the Far East lately. That's understandable, because an awful lot of folks get hooked into watching garbage TV shows that are put there just to keep them distracted, so they haven't a free moment to think for themselves. It's scarily effective, too. All the time we're watching some godawful, gut-wrenching crap like 'Friends' or 'Seinfeld' we don't have our eyes on the ball - and that's exactly what the Power Elite want. They much prefer their manipulations go on unobserved, and when we're watching their TV, that's exactly what's happening; we're blind to their designs against us.

Returning to the theme of this article, you may wonder what the problem is with a United World? "Wouldn't that mean an end to all wars and peace ever after?" I hear some of you ask. I am of course addressing innocent little young Liberals who've been brainwashed by the mainstream jewsmedia here, not my die-hard buddies like Grimm, Maynard, the West, Bacon, Kenny, Whiteman and others who live in the REAL world. Sure, World Peace is a great concept worth striving for (hence the name of this blog!) But will world peace ever be realized under a single, unitary world government? I most passionately believe it WILL NOT and the proof for this assertion is irrefutable. A borderless planet will only make matters FAR WORSE than they already are and I'll tell you why if you bear with me a little longer...

There is a saying in the West that "good fences make for good neighbors" and no 'country' but Israel knows this truism better. Israel is a law unto itself and practices apartheid against its Arab hosts like no other 'nation' is allowed to get away with. Within Israel, the practice of "marrying out" - that is a Jew marrying a non-Jew - is regarded by many as an 'individual holocaust' - a singular tragedy which weakens the entire Jewish race. This is a very curious attitude indeed coming from the very same entities that preach to us from their media soap boxes every day about the evils of homophobia, xenophobia, anti-Semitism and hate-crime, and the virtues of tolerance; the acceptace of perversion and all the other artificial bullshit constructs they've devised to engender an unwarranted sense of guilt, self-loathing and subordination in us.

But I digress. After all, unlike the Jew, I'm only human. All too human (to quote Nietzsche, in fact). So let's return to the subject of this essay. How will a borderless world lead to world peace?? Of course by now you will have reasoned out that from my standpoint, it won't! Not a chance. Not a snowball's chance in hell will it. But a lot of innocent, well-meaning types have been caught up in the drive towards it. They don't know that they're aiding and abetting the Jews in their quest for endless war, misery, starvation and bloodshed. How could they possibly know? Because these truths NEVER wind up on the mainstream newsmedia (because it's 96% Jew-owned and/or controlled).

The reason multiculturalism doesn't work is because folks have VERY LONG memories and are connected by blood ties which go back for very many centuries. For absolute proof, one need look no further than what happened in the former Yugoslavia. The Russians - who were at that time hell-bent on the unification of all peoples via the absorbtion of disparate races in the false belief that ethnically-different peoples of that part of the world would assimilate and live together in peace and harmony. The problem was that it could never, in reality, happen. NWO apparachicks have this crazy belief that all the people of the world are the same under the skin and can get along just fine together - and this is a terrible falsehood that the Jews - who know better and maintain their 'high fences' philosophy above all else - are happy to foster for their own nefarious purposes.

This headlong rush toward One World Government that we are being decieved into accepting only ever benefits Big Financiers and the Big Business interests they're in bed with. It sells out the interests of the ordinary yet exceptional people that made this once-great country truly great and it ushers in a new breed of super predator that is intent on reducing every individual around the world to the lowest common denominator. The NWO brigade tell us that "borders are only lines on a map" and that's why "pencils have erasers" and they're hell bent on wiping frontiers out world-wide. How is THAT kind of attitude going to provoke anything but endless war? Serbia´s history of nationalism harks back to the 14th century and they are far from unique in having such long and fond memories of their glorious past. Pride in one´s race and cultural history isn´t something that´s simply going to die out after a few generations, no matter how much the loony Liberals wish it.

Many folks from vastly different cultural backgrounds simply CANNOT live together in peace, as has been proven by the experience of Yugoslavia and elsewhere around the globe. But perhaps that's what the Jews want, after all. It seems from the Old Testament that their god does have an curious liking for the smell of burning flesh and there's no better way to ensure a steady supply of the stuff than by making the entire globe a single, borderless superstate with vastly disparate persons dwelling cheek-by-jowl therein. But don't worry over the future of the Jews, dear reader! They will still keep their bloodline pure. Inter-racial breeding is strictly for the goyim. There will always be a border around Israel, albeit a much enlarged one compared to today´s. The seat of World Government must be a secure one and unlike what will by then be Everywhere Else, we can´t have just anyone wandering into Israel whenever they please!

"WTF?? someone dun stole muh dick!!!"

Invariably when those of us in the real world write anything about Africa, it´s never anything positive. This item no exception, but it IS highly amusing, nevertheless. Therefore it´s included today just to lighten the mood a little. And no, it´s not made up, honest! There´s a link to a mainstream jewsmedia site so you can verify it for yourselves. Enjoy....

Source: BBC news: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/1678996.stm

Benin alert over 'penis theft' panic
Mopeds in Cotonou
Illiteracy rates are high and many are very superstitious
The authorities in Benin have ordered security forces to curb violence in the commercial capital, Cotonou, following the deaths of five people by vigilantes

There have been reports of at least 10 such attacks since Saturday.

Four of those who died were burned, another man was hacked to death.

Correspondents say that mobs have attacked indivduals accused of using magic to steal men's penises.

The belief that men's private parts can mysteriously disappear through a handshake or an incantation is commonplace in Benin where superstition and illiteracy are rife.

Stripped naked

The BBC's Karim Okanla in Cotonou says these attacks begin by someone screaming that that they have been robbed of their penis.


An angry mob would then descend on any passer-by deemed to look suspicious, strip them naked and then douse them in petrol before setting them alight.

No one in the crowd would stop to question their actions or ask whether the accused might possess magical powers, he says.

Our correspondent adds that there have been some lucky escapes for people.

An angry mob almost necklaced a photojournalist who happened to be passing by whilst a crowd was hunting for a suspect.

Another example, he says, was when a high school principal narrowly escaped death, after a mob objected to him sheltering a man they had been chasing in his school.

One report said three of the people torched were foreigners.

Jewish Debating Techniques #1

Oftentimes a lot of what we read enters the back of our minds at a subconscious level and it lies there, latent and gently percolating away until such time as an outside event prompts our conscious recollection of it. Such it was for Phaedrus with an old Patrick Grimm essay entitled 'The Taboo as Proof' (herewith today re-published below.)Taboos are very useful for putting sensitive subjects beyond debate, as Patrick himself pointed out. The one thing the Jews fear above all else is an even-handed and totally open investigation into their long and checkered history, for the ugliness thereby revealed would be simply beyond the belief of all bar the most heavily initiated of persons. Not surprisingly, therefore, the Jews have developed a series of techniques for stifling debate on such issues and avoiding having to address these sensitive matters AT ALL. This article is about one such technique and its most eloquent exponent, the 'British Jew' Alan Coren, who not-so-sadly died last year.

Those of us who espouse views which are generally taken to be outside the current spectrum of "acceptable opinion" by the popular media will - if we are lucky enough to get a platform in the first place - often find ourselves taken to task in the presence of a Jew by a hostile interviewer who falsely purports to be impartial. Many, many years ago, such encounters were the norm and indeed unfettered, free and open debate was quite properly regarded as the only viable route to establishing the real, underlying truth. But that was some decades ago when the Jewish stranglehold over 'permissible utterances' was very much weaker. I refer of course to those increasingly distant days prior to the advent of political-correctness.

Now, if one has something dreadful to hide for which one can offer no valid excuse, it doesn't benefit one to debate one's beliefs in the media spotlight, for fear of being caught short of an appropriate response to an unwelcome or unexpected question or accusation. The Jew, uniquely, has developed the perfect technique in such awkward situations: 'the disgusted walk-out.'

This 'storm of self-righteous indignation" method offers a number of benefits for any Jewish interviewee who's been caught off-guard on a sensitive issue. Namely:

1. It lends him elevated 'moral authority' - he appears to occupy the high moral ground by virtue of storming off in feigned disgust with his nose in the air, rather than 'lowering himself' to bandy words with those of seemingly fixed opinions hostile to Judaism.

2. It avoids him having to answer any awkward questions concerning his people and their 'interesting history' (such as the Holocaust period or the genocide in Palestine) that his interlocutor might confront him about from out of the blue with hard, indisputable evidence.

3. It creates in the audience a sense of sympathy and respect for the Jew, who though clearly so grievously insulted, exercised immense dignity and self-control by simply walking out, rather than punching his opponent on the nose.

4. Most importantly of course, it enables the Jew to yet again escape scott-free without ever having to address a single allegation made against him, his race, and/or their complex and deeply troubling history.

The Jewish Grand Master of the self-righteous storm-out was a 'British' radio and TV personality by the name of Alan Coren who enjoyed a long and active career in 'journalism' and broadcasting in the US and Britain before finally settling down at the BBC in London (at the license payers' expense, of course). Coren's parents came to Britain between the two World Wars and (like so many other Jewish immigrant families) changed their original name, COHEN, to something less obviously Jewish; in this case, "Coren" - not very imaginative but it nevertheless did the trick. Anyway, Coren's specialty was storming out in self-righteous indignation the moment anyone raised any uncomfortable facts concerning the Tribe of Satan.

Coren/Cohen had it down to a very fine art and really should have been a character actor. The moment anyone ventured into any area that was REMOTELY critical of the Jews or Israel, Coren would assume a deathly grave expression, solemnly gather his papers together, tear-off his microphone and earpiece with well-practiced theatricality, and simply walk out without a word, shaking his head in disgust. Seemingly no one ever worked out that the move was simply a ruse to avoid having to address the issue raised. The Jew Cohen would subsequently enjoy sympathy heaped upon him by empathetic viewers for his noble refusal to get down and dirty with 'racists and anti-Semites.'

So, gentile reader, please remember that Jews who walk out of interviews aren't really offended at all. They simply cannot justify themselves or their kind; they have no answers that the rest of us would deem acceptable. And they KNOW it!

The Taboo as Proof

By Patrick Grimm

Taboos, at least the ones possessed of longevity, exist and subsist for a reason. Two taboos that spring easily to mind are the prohibitions against incest and cannibalism. These two prohibitions, mostly unspoken and never even verbally assented to, remain for obvious reasons, mainly having to do with dysgenic consequences and notions of the rights of man culled from both religion and natural law. While other taboos have fallen away, some rightly, others wrongly, these two have stood the test of time, and they have done so because the perils of violating them have been seen in Third World and backward cultures throughout the ages.

But what of other taboos, those topics which have become verboten in contemporary America? This would include the unassailability and the untouchability of Jews as a group, an innocent subset that is only “hard done unto” and never the harbinger of hardship and injustice themselves. In other words, when perpetual victims rule, those they victimize can never lay claim to victim status themselves. In the Jewish mind, considering that they are “history’s premier victims” this is guaranteed in ways that have been covered in other essays, exposes and op-eds that won’t be cited here, but is part and parcel of the extensive psychological programming that the American Gentile public has been subjected to non-stop for at least forty years, though its history goes back much further than this, at least to the beginning of the twentieth century.

The taboos with staying power are imbued with said power because the fallout of knocking down the warning signs and the stigmas attached would be unthinkable. A society that indulges in incest on a ubiquitous scale (which is highly unlikely in most societies) would, given enough time, be a society containing persons with birth defects and other maladies brought on by blood relations producing offspring together. The Orthodox Jewish community and their own specialized diseases and neuroses attest to this. The proof they say, is in the pudding and this taboo seems self-evidentiary, but does not need strong and regular condemnation because it is rarely breached and rightly condemned in the harshest of moral terms when it is violated. The same would go for cannibalism. Social evolution has created these prohibitions quite naturally.

What of the taboo on discussing Jewish power, Jewish motives and the Jewish religion? Has it come from the evolution of societies? Not entirely. Much of it has been imposed from the top down since War World II when sympathy for Jews was the highest and when it could be easily capitalized upon by media, film and political organizations, as well as psychology and sociology, all roughly rounded up and diverted from true intellectualism to the pursuit of crude propagandistic purposes. These were all molded to serve only one purpose. To convince the Gentile that Jews were only victimized, never victimizers and always angels, never devils and were pure spirits who beamed with holy light, with a selflessness and altruism that not even the most pure-hearted humanitarian could exude.

Try an experiment. Talk about “Jewish business practices” and place a serious expression on your face. Use “Jew” as a verb rather than a noun and you will find that you are condemned as worse than someone who practices incest or cannibalism. And don’t you dare say you think they control our economy or manipulate our currency. You might just lose your job and all your friends too.

Try another experiment. Talk about “Jewish business practices” and place a warm smile on your face. When you say “Jew” say it solemnly, in a tone as if you are talking about a godhead or a triune and then literally glow as you marvel at how Jews are so hard-working, how they helped create modern capitalism and how that they have been a blessing to our country with their business and financial acumen. You will find swooning concurrence from your listeners, who will fall all over themselves to outdo your praise.

The taboo against critical Jew-examination is rigid and unbending, for to be an “anti-Semite” is not just to be a moral criminal. It is to be hardly better than a murderer such as Josef Mengele or a chief propagandist like Julius Streicher. You forget that the National Socialists’ greatest crime was not what they purportedly did to their Jewish population, but that they even dared to see Jews as anything but benevolent, as exemplary and as a boon to the nation that they (Jews) had stabbed in the back. Of course, the Jews themselves know that they are rarely any of these aforementioned beneficial things.

But the Jews want immediate revenge, immediate censorship once they realize that they no longer possess, inhabit, control, contort and compress a nation’s mind, as they are slowly finding out too late in the sleeping giant of America, as whites are jumping up with a horror-stricken realization as the broken inner alarm clock gets fixed.

Nationalism as a defense mechanism has the possibility of truncating Jewish supremacist internationalism, Mammonite greed and ADL/Mossad intrigue and treason if it is ever allowed to blossom. Jews are absolutely correct to say that “nationalism” always portends “anti-Semitism” and anti-Jewish outbursts on the part of the citizenry and they desperately work to stamp it out everywhere they reside. Jews hate all nationalism but their own, just like they hate all solidarity and pride in heritage that is non-Jewish. As Russia revives its national pride, its tolerance for Jewish oligarchy, Jewish criminality and Jewish-run media and banking will wear thin. In this case, the populace knows who the enemy is. The Czar was not slaughtered by ethnic Russians, after all.

All taboos exist for a reason. In this case, the taboo against chattering and stream-of-consciousness round-table talk of Jewish power does prevent a disaster, the disaster that would beset the Jewish people if the Gentile majority knew the truth about them, about their criminality, about their lies, about their hate and the repulsion they feel towards our European heritage. The fact that this taboo is so engrained is proof of the reality of what it protects, what it covers up and how it blurs and hides the truth, the unbelievable truth about Jewish supremacism. But you, dear friend, in choosing to believe that unbelievable truth, will take a monumental stride towards a freer, more peaceful, more equitable world for every people, who will be allowed both self-determination and the liberation of being unshackled by the autocrats who now chain them, steal the very money from their pockets, the very food from out their mouths and the very diamonds and minerals from out of their nations’ blessed lands. White European people must free themselves from Jewish oligarchy so that they may help every race and heritage find deliverance from the Zionist monster.

The taboo is the proof and behind every taboo can be hidden either a utilitarian benefit or a reality so horrible that none wish to wrap their brains around the possibility of the possibility of its accuracy. We have both in this instance. The “greatest good for the greatest number” will only occur when this particular taboo is not upheld, but smashed to smithereens. The horrors and terrors of Big Jewry’s anti-white dysgenics, its theft of our earnings, its purloining of our heritage can only be spotted when we jackhammer our way through the concrete foundation of deception and greed. We must tear the voice boxes from the throats of those who feed poison and bile to our children as they tempt them to suicide their race, their honor and their country.

I will only leave you with these lyrics by songwriter Mark Heard that seem at least partially apropos to the predicament I have described:

Like bees in a bottle we are flying at fate
Beating our wings against the walls of this place
Unaware that the struggle is the blood of the proof
In choosing to believe the unbelievable truth

But they have captured our siblings and rendered them mute
They’ve disputed our lineage and poisoned our roots
We have bought from the brokers who have broken their oaths
And we’re out on the streets with a lump in our throats

Jews: Victims or Villains?

Phaedrus noted with some curiosity the fact that Israel commemorated its Holocaust Memorial Day last week, whereas we in the rest of the world celebrate it in February. In fact regular readers of World Peace will recall our plea on that day to forget about what happened over 60 years ago and concentrate instead on today's REAL Holocaust: the brutal treatment of Palestinian civilians at the hands of Zionist Jews.

But returning the Israel's commemoration; something about it struck Phaedrus and friends as just plain wrong and it needs to be set straight lest we continue to forget - as we appear to be doing yet again - the invaluable lessons of history. And we're not talking about having two, separate days and how that might generate more publicity and more importantly, money. It's nothing so banal.

What exactly, then, is the problem? Well, in the Western mainstream media, the event was described as commemorating the "victims of the Nazis" or the "victims of German National Socialism." Doubtless these terms went straight over the heads of most folks. I'd wager over 99% of people didn't bat an eyelid. But drawing attention to uncomfortable facts is what blogs like this one are all about.

So you'll no doubt be wondering what the difficulty is with the above terminology. Well, it's simply this: if the event popularly referred to and licensed (all rights reserved) as 'the Holocaust' were a ONE-OFF pogrom then there would be no problem. The event could justifiably be put down to "Nazism" or "National Socialism" and that would be largely the end of the matter. But it's not so straightforward. Can you see where we're heading with this line of argument yet? Probably, but just to leave no room for doubt, let's elaborate...

Were the Jews victims of the Visigoths when they were purged from early 7th century Spain?

Were the Jews victims of the Carthegians 400 years prior to that?

In the 13th century, were the Jews victims of the English King Edward when they were expelled from that country for some 400 years before bribing their way back in again?

One could go on and on and on. In short, the Jews have been booted out of EVERY SINGLE European country at one time or another and not a few other countries outside of Europe besides. In fact, they have at one time or another been purged from over 100 places around the world over the last 1,750 years. Now this puts rather a different complexion on the matter, wouldn't you agree?

So let's wind up this item with an appropriate conclusion. We can see from the foregoing that the Jews ARE indeed victims, but NOT of the Nazis, nor the Turks, nor the Arabs, nor the Huns, nor the Hungarians, but rather of Judaism and Jewishness. They are such reprehensible wretches that they bring all this bad will on themselves, and then have the temerity to blame others for their own evil-doing and seek sympathy and financial compensation for same.

That should be enough to convince anyone about the true nature of Jewish 'victimhood' but for anyone still in denial, here's some quotes from the Jews' holy book, the Talmud which perfectly illustrate why they are such an odious breed of unwanted parasite. This sacred Jewish text decreed by ancient senior Rabbis sets out how Jews may behave in their dealings with non-Jews (and it ain't pretty...)


“Just the Jews are humans, the Non-Jews are not humans, but cattle.” [goyim – human cattle] – (Kerithuth 6b page 78, Jebhammoth 61a)

“The Non-Jews have been created to serve the Jews as slaves.” - (Midrasch Talpioth 225)

“The Non-Jews have to be avoided, even more than sick pigs.” - (Orach Chaiim 57, 6a)

“Sexual intercourse with Non-Jews is like sexual intercourse with animals” – (Kethuboth 3b)

“The birth-rate of the Non-Jews has to be suppressed massively” - (Zohar II, 4b)

“As you replace lost cows and donkeys, so you shall replace dead Non-Jews.” – (Iore Dea 337,1)

“To box an Israeli on the ear, is like to box on the ear of god.” – (Sanhedrin 58b)

"God (Jahveh) is never angry about the Jews, just about the Non-Jews” – (Talmud IV/8/4a)

“The human (Jew) has to pray every day three times, because Jahveh didn’t make him a goyim, not a female and not an ignorant.” – (Talmud V/2/43b + 44a)

“Everywhere they (the Jews) come, they will be the princes of the lords” – (Sanhedrin 104a)

“I, Jahveh make you [the Jewry] the ancestor of the peoples, I make you the selected one amongst the peoples, I make you the king over the peoples, I make you the loved one amongst the peoples, I make you the best one amongst the peoples, I make you the trusted one amongst the peoples” – (Schabbat 105a)

“Towards a Non-Jew the Jew doesn’t cause an adultery… Punishable for the Jew, is just the adultery towards his next, that means the wife of a Jew. The wife of the Non-Jew is excluded” – (Talmud IV/4/52b)

There is no wife for the goyim, they really aren’t their wives” - (Talmud IV/4/81 + 82ab)

“You (the Jews) have made me, Jahveh, the only true lord in the world, so I will make you the only ruler in the world”

“Who wants to be smart shall occupy himself with money matters, because there are no corner pillars in the Thora that are more important, because they are like a sparkling fountain” – (Talmud IV/3/173b)

“Jews always have to try to deceive Non-Jews” – (Zohar I, 168a)

“Carry on trade with Non-Jews, if they have to pay money for it” - (Abhodah Zarah 2a T)

“Non-Jewish property belongs to the Jew who uses it first” - (Babba Bathra 54b)

“If two Jews have deceived a Non-Jew, they have to split the profit” - (Choschen Ham 183,7)

“Every Jew is allowed to use lies and perjury to bring a Non-Jew to ruin” - (Babha Kama 113a)

“The possessions of the goyim are like an ownerless desert, and everybody [every Jew] who seizes it, has acquired it” - (Talmud IV/3/54b)

“The Jew is allowed to exploit the mistake of a Non-Jew and to deceive him” - (Talmud IV/1/113b)

“The Jew is allowed to practice usury on the Non-Jew” - (Talmud IV/2/70b)

“When the Messiah comes, all will be slaves of the Jews” - (Erubin 43b)


=====================================================================================


THAT, dear friends, is proof positive that the Jews are NOT victims of OTHERS, but simply their OWN WORST ENEMIES.

An Exemplary Life?

The 'Power Elite' as Huxley called them, like their subjects to conform to a certain personality type. It makes taking over the world a very much easier task. Untold years of indoctrination via every conceivable medium (with the sole exception of the Internet) help facilitate great results in this long-term social engineering project to usher in a united world government with uniformly brown semi-moron citizens to do all the work. In the following not-so-fictional account of the life of the 'average joe' Phaedrus imagines how any one of us could unwittingly enable this nightmare vision to become a reality, due to a combination of apathy, misplaced trust in our leaders, and an unwillingness to rock the boat...

Conventional, respectable mid-western couple, Joe and Patsy married in 1971 following a four year courtship. The couple ventured out on the road of conventional married life in the typical American way. They were keen to get ahead; not obscenely ambitious you understand, but just naturally seeking to thrive and prosper in that optimistic, forward-looking innocent way of those distant days. Just about everything they owned was bought no money down with payments over 3 years. Falling for every garbage advert on TV., they accumulated a stack of useless crap, but it felt pretty good at the time and everyone else they knew was doing the same thing so there was a pressure to conform. Additionally, Joe had a well-paid, steady job at the car plant and Patsy taught math and English at the local elementary school. Things were as rosy as they can be for any young couple starting out.

In fact, life was pretty sweet for several years. They planned not to have any kids right away, but rather prudently to wait until such time as they were financially secure enough - like any responsible parents in those days. Nevertheless, after some 11 years of general contentment, Patsy began to feel that having kids couldn't be put off any longer and the time was now right to start that well-planned family.

Like the responsible couple that they were, Joe and Patsy had therefore deferred having children until they were good and ready for such a heavy responsibility. Conception was a good while coming though for Patsy, for reasons the doctors couldn't quite figure out. Tests didn't show up any abnormalities in either of them. Eventually, however, after much delay, further tests, and fertility treatment, they became proud parents of a wonderful daughter, Lucy. Raising a child is never easy, but Joe and Patsy gave it their best shot. Unfortunately, owing to the pressures of work, quality parenting time was in short supply and though they loved their daughter dearly, the time they spent with her was a great deal less than they would have liked. Lucy was less extrovert than most girls her age and craved her parents' attention, which owing to their lack of time she never got enough of. She spent unhealthily long hours growing up watching TV. Mom and dad weren't happy about that, but they were well into the rat-race by this time and simply consoled themselves with the thought that at least with the television for company, Lucy had something absorbing to keep her occupied.

Sometime in the late 1980s, there was a massive political debate about protectionism versus globalization. Some cool-looking guy in a pinstripe suit was arguing vigorously for free trade and said it would bring greater prosperity and better paid, more secure jobs to America. His opponent, rather older and not quite as snappily-dressed, asserted that it would do nothing of the sort and would in fact, only benefit the interests of big business and the super-rich. He went on to say that the American worker deserved protection from some of the working practices in the far east and elsewhere in order to defend his standard of living at home. The pinstripe retorted that God help us all when the American worker needs protection from foreigners. The American worker, he continued, was the best in the world. What could he possibly have to fear from his foreign counterpart? The tone of this rebuke had something mocking about it which rattled Joe. It somehow sounded as if the older man believed the American worker couldn't take on foreign competition and hope to win; almost like it was some kind of physical challenge that he and his colleagues weren't up to. "Bring it on!!" he snapped angrily, "Shove your protectionism! The American worker don't need it. We'll whip their asses!"

It was only many years later after most of the big plants had closed down that Joe realized the pinstripe's argument had been somewhat misleading. Rather than squaring up for a fist-fight with some coolie in a rice paddy, he'd actually been pitted against said coolie's own pay rates and working conditions. The coolie in the far east was quite prepared to work surrounded in squalor, ingesting cadmium and other toxic heavy metals, for little more than 40 cents a day, whereas Joe's union's workplace agreements set quite a high standard in all respects for its workers; hence the company couldn't survive in the international marketplace. It shrank over the years to a fraction of its former size and was eventually shut-down altogether. It was only then that the reality of those attractive-sounding buzzwords, "free trade! modernization! and globalization!" finally sank in. But by then the damage had been done. Poor old Joe!

Meanwhile there was the constant burble of the radio and TV as a sort of soundtrack/backdrop to the years. It's odd how the US always seems to be fighting a war abroad someplace or another. Sometimes it seems as if these conflicts never end. Our troops pull out of country x, declaring victory - when no sooner has the dust settled than they're invading country y! It reminded Joe dimly of some sci-fi movie he'd once seen set in 1984. The world is dangerous place, Joe concludes. Thank God America has a history of strong leaders that don't take any crap from foreign aggressors or we'd all have been in big trouble long ago!

More years pass and his darling daughter, Lucy has some great news to impart: she's getting married! She's found this really great guy called Michael and they were head-over-heals in love! One evening shortly afterwards, Lucy brings Michael home to meet her mom and pop. Joe is mortified! Lucy has been dating a Negro, and it further transpires, is already pregnant by him! He's too shocked to connect the fact that his laziness in letting the TV raise his daughter could come back and bite him in the ass like this in later life. However, by this time he's so wary of being branded a 'racist' that he bites his lip and says nothing. Somehow he manages to force a smile and acts like he's delighted, even though he instinctively knows his genome - everything that's made him and his kin what they are up until this point, is about to go down the toilet for keeps.

As soon as his daughter has the baby, her black partner, Michael, starts acting kind of strange. He disappears for weeks on end; never at any time contributing towards the child's upkeep or getting in touch with its mother, but only rarely via the phone to accuse her of seeing other men behind his back. Meanwhile the child is also behaving strangely. Lucy had noticed for some time that it was almost impossible to engage in steady eye-contact with the infant, and it also had an unhealthy obsession with playing with its own excrement; daubing it on walls and flicking it over the furniture. After a handful of visits to various health care professionals and at the age of two-and-a-half, the child was diagnosed with autism. The senior consultant in paediatrics confided guardedly in Joe, "I'm not supposed to say this and please don't repeat it, but we often find this disorder arising more frequently in children of mixed-race parents."

Joe gloomily drives Lucy back from the surgery. He resigns himself to the deficits of modern family life. After all, practically every family he knows seems to be in one mess or another these days. What can you do? The pamphlets the consultant had handed them as they left had some useful tips on how to deal with children with autism, but they also stated such kids cost about $650 a month more than the average healthy child to raise. And the prospects of getting so much as a nickel out of the father weren't great. Moreover, Lucy's chances of a second shot at happiness with a new guy - at least one with prospects - were now that much more remote, given that she had a mixed-race child with 'special needs' in tow. It was going to be tough going for them all.

Every once in a while Joe gets to hear some half-assed conspiracy theory from some guy in a bar. On this occasion, some wacko with unkempt hair and thick spectacles is explaining how in reality it was the US government that destroyed the World Trade Center in 2001; how Uncle Sam is the American people's greatest enemy by far, and all this talk of "terrorism" is just a smokescreen to account for endless wars abroad and increasing police powers against US citizens at home. This guy's views get a mixed reception among the patrons. Two other customers appeared to be hanging on his every word, one other was seemingly indifferent, but Joe and his usual drinking buddy, Ed had no time for such crap. If there were any mileage in such an outrageous story, then it would have been all over the mainstream media long ago. No journalist worth a dime would ever let a sensational scoop of the century like that pass him by, so self-evidently the claim has to be complete rubbish. Joe rolls his eyes to Ed, knocks back his beer and shuffles outside shaking his head in disbelief at the gullibility of some folks.

The late summer afternoon air is oppressive. Joe hears a drowsy, soporific drone from above: there are planes criss-crossing the sky leaving wispy, white trails in their wakes. The patterns are quite pretty and diffuse and disperse almost artistically. Before making the final left turn towards his home, Joe buys an evening paper from a street vendor. Buried somewhere on page 72, opposite the sports section, he finds a curious article about strange chemicals turning up in the food chain and falling fertility rates among white males over the last 30 years. "Is there a connection?" the paper asks, but draws no firm conclusions. He turns instead to the major league baseball results and subsequently cans the paper in disgust when he discovers how badly his favorite team faired last time out. He's tired and grumpy as usual, he eats his evening meal alone in front of the TV then goes straight to his computer to check for mail with barely a grunt to the nowadays largely ignored Patsy.

One day a short time later, he arrives home, bitching as usual about the cost of everything going up and how tough it is to get by these days, when right out of the blue, his world is blown apart by some earth-shattering news his wife has to tell him. Lucy's estranged partner, Michael, has been shot dead by the police. His jealousy had gotten to him once too often one sultry afternoon. Crazed by a combination of drink and drugs he'd stabbed her 27 times in a fit of violent rage in the belief that she'd been having sex with other men. None of this was true, but he'd turned to the crack-pipe of late and had become increasingly paranoid and delusional. This final episode culminating in the death of Joe's daughter had simply been "a disaster waiting to happen" - as the local law enforcement officers had put it. When Michael suddenly pulled a gun on these cops, as they approached to question him over a report of some screams heard coming from nearby, they had no option but to return fire and had killed him outright.

More years pass. For something approaching 35 years now, Joe had been contributing to a pension scheme, but the first such scheme went belly-up in some huge financial scandal that was never resolved, so now he's only got 12 years' worth of contributions under his belt with a new investment outfit. Unbeknown to Joe, however, he won't be calling on it, for he has no retirement to enjoy. Very many years of exposure to various environmental toxins and the stress of his insecure lifestyle have finally taken their toll on poor Joe. Compounded by the pressure of having not had a secure job for 17 years, eating too much junk food on the move and the stress of always being just one deal away from the trailer park eventually killed him. He developed severe chest pains and his doctor told him he needed a triple bypass urgently. Unfortunately, the cost of the surgery would have ruined the family and left them outdoors, so instead he simply adopted a low-fat diet and exercised more. Yeah, that oughta do it: who needs surgery? The people that founded America never had recourse to it!

Joe's wife Patsy was devastated by the loss of her hard-working husband just 9 months later, but at least she had the consolation that his long-standing financial prudence would provide her with some much needed security in the old age she now faced alone with her autistic grandchild. But some small print in the pension agreement threw the whole thing into doubt. She could take SOME benefits under Joe's contract, but it would be little more than a token sum of less than 10% of his rightful entitlement, had he lived. Furthermore, the capital sum would never pass to her, owing to some other complexly-worded provision annexed to the end of the agreement in a separate schedule. The salesman who sold them the plan made it all seem so simple at the time! Pity they'd been foolish enough to have trusted him and not kept an independent record of what he'd told them.

With the conviction that right was right, and truth always prevails in the end, she engaged a New York law firm, Shyster, Shafter & Shylock, to fight her quarter for her. They sounded very hopeful of a successful outcome and issued proceedings immediately against Joe's former insurance company. Patsy confidently left them to pursue the matter; she had a lot of other pressing stuff to get on with herself.

5 months rolled by and she was shocked to learn, from an interim account sent her, that the lawyers' fees had already gobbled up half of her expected winnings IF she were to win the case. The situation had already become untenable. She had no option but to instruct them to drop the proceedings. It was simply beyond her means to fight on and get a pay-out. She had no choice but to cut her loses and run. She settled-up with the lawyers to the tune of $45,000 which she had to borrow from her sister and put the whole rotten episode down to experience.

So what did our ideal citizen, Joe, have show for his life? A HUGE stack of paid and unpaid bills, bank and credit card statements, and a disabled, mixed-race grandchild. Great legacy, huh, Joe? But the fact is he didn't die entirely in vain. Even though he himself and his family had nothing to show for his entirely unremarkable existence, he nonetheless DID significantly contribute to others' needs somewhere along the line. For example, his tax-dollars helped fund several wars. They also paid the salaries of the politicians that oh-so-carefully looked after him and his family's interests whilst he was alive. Much of the money also went to the US's special ally, Israel - a strategic friend of the West that had to be kept afloat at all costs lest we all be murdered in our beds by terrorists.

So Joe's life had a purpose after all. He worked hard, never thought too deeply about anything, always trusted the government and respected the President. Sure he bitched about all the taxes he paid and how his and everyone else's standard of living had gone down the can over the decades, but he never kicked up a fuss over it. He just resigned himself to the idea that he was powerless and that no matter how crazy and suicidal some government policies - of both parties - might have appeared, at least they were only doing their best for America and only meant well at heart. When things HAD gone wrong, as they so frequently did - it was nothing sinister, no secret agenda, but rather just plain old incompetence - which politicians of all colors seemed cursed by. Joe's was in short, a life of blissful ignorance and intellectual poverty. His genome consequently got what it had coming all along: oblivion.

The Most Heavily Spied-On Country in the World

No, surprisingly, it's not America; it's Britain. Britain has the highest ratio of CCTV cameras per head of population in the world - bar none. No other country spies on its citizens in every way more than the UK. Not just with mere cameras, but every other intrusive device the latest technology can deliver.

CCTV has been a fact of life for the British since the early 1970s, but those early, crude, black & white installations were largely confined to plush department stores and sensitive government buildings. Their blurry pictures delivered little more than disputable evidence of possible wrong-doing.

However, technology marches ever onwards, and the spy-camera toll in Britain rose substantially in the 1980s under the great Jew-admirer (according to the London Times) Margaret Thatcher. But it only entered into its really stratospheric growth phase following the election of an even bigger Jew-lover, Tony Blair, as Prime Minister of that hell-bound country in 1997.

Blair originally arose as a genuine 'man of the people' with over-archingly decent values. He stuck his neck on the block, took huge risks, and delivered peace to Northern Ireland (for which all credit is due). However, a short time later, his early peaceable inclinations were to suffer a sudden reversal, as they do for everyone, it seems, when they get too chummy with members of the Tribe of Satan.

Blair was unusually heavily drawn (even by politicians' standards) to the lure of power and wealth. No one could have predicted a metamorphosis of this magnitude from such a squeaky-clean provenance. Notwithstanding his former innocence, he sold-out totally to Zionism and flogged his country to a Federal Europe in exchange for the glory of becoming the first ever President of Europe. Though yet to be 'crowned', that was the deal this traitor was offered, and greedily accepted.

It was Blair who sold Britain out to the interests of the New World Order program. It was Blair who took the Jews' 30 pieces of silver and delivered a once great country into the claws of evil foreigners - just the same as George Bush has in America. And herein lies the key to understanding the blanket coverage of spy-cameras in Britain today. THEY (the British government) claim it's all about 'protecting the public' (ever heard that before? - clue: Bush and Cheney).

The truth is that it's nothing of the sort. The government of Britain (AKA 'Airstrip One' according to George Orwell in 'Nineteen-Eighty-Four') has gotten so deeply in hock with the NWO's proponents that it's become paranoid and deeply fearful of its OWN people. The cameras are NOTHING to do with protecting the PUBLIC - they are ALL about protecting a treasonous government FROM the PUBLIC.

Blair and his clones suffer paranoia with very good reason. They are all too well aware that they have delivered the country into the talons of the agents of One World Government and that if the British people were to become aware of this fact, they would rise up and chop off the heads of these traitors for all the unspeakable injustice and cruelty they have suffered as a consequence of this treacherous betrayal.

So it's down to the mass media, with all its distractions, to take the eyes of the people off the ball for just a short while longer, whereupon Britain will become just another precinct of the Jews' universal domain - as will the US and eventually, the entire world.

What are the enemy spies in Britain looking and listening out for? "Hey, Bill, you'll never guess what! I've just found out those treasonous bastards in Parliament that have been lauding it over us for so long have been taking their instructions from a foreign power! And it's been going on for decades! That's why our culture is being wantonly destroyed! All those seemingly crazy rumors we've been reading about on the Internet lately turn out to be true!"

This is what all the spying (for that is what it is) in Britain in all its forms is REALLY all about: protecting and advancing the NWO Program.

A Dream? More Like a Vision of Hell...

The words of these two pop songs pretty much summarize the New World Order agenda and its unitary world government program (with joo-know-who running the entire show, of course).

If you want to know what the bastards that govern us in the West have in store, you need read no more than what follows below:


'Melting Pot' - Blue Mink

Take a pinch of white man
Wrap him up in black skin
Add a touch of blue blood
And a little bitty bit of red Indian boy
Oh like a Curly Latin kinkies
Oh Lordy, Lordy, mixed with yellow Chinkees, yeah
You know you lump it all together
And you got a recipe for a get along scene
Oh what a beautiful dream
If it could only come true, you know, you know

What we need is a great big melting pot
Big enough enough enough to take
The world and all its got And keep it stirring for a hundred years or more
And turn out coffee colored people by the score

Rabbis and the friars
Vishnus and the gurus
We got the Beatles or the Sun God
Well it really doesn't matter what religion you choose
And be thankful little Mrs. Graceful
You know that livin' could be tasteful
We should all get together in a lovin' machine
I think I'll call up the queen
It' s only fair that she knows, you know, you know

What we need is a great big melting pot
Big enough enough enough to take
The world and all its got And keep it stirring for a hundred years or more
And turn out coffee colored people by the score


'Imagine' - John Lennon

Imagine there's no heaven
It's easy if you try
No hell below us
Above us only sky
Imagine all the people
Living for today...

Imagine there's no countries
It isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion too
Imagine all the people
Living life in peace...

You may say I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will be as one

Imagine no possessions
I wonder if you can
No need for greed or hunger
A brotherhood of man
Imagine all the people
Sharing all the world...

You may say I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will be as one


Dream on, Lennon. This is Marxist ideology, pure and simple, yet both Republicans and Democrats are embracing it. Where's McCarthy now we REALLY need him?

Why I won't be voting in 2008

There are three potential candidates to choose from at the current time, and NONE of them are worth JACK SHIT. They hail from 'One Party With Two Names.'

Clinton: now unmasked as a bellicose, war-mongering Jew who would be perfectly happy to murder millions of innocent civilians in Iran in an all-out nuclear conflagration, simply in order to curry favor with her Jewish masters in Tel Aviv. What kind of a sick mind could conceive of such an atrocity; much less articulate it publicly into a pledge: "make me your leader and I'll incinerate millions of innocents for my bosses in Israel." No way, Shillary. You're evil, sick in the head, and extremely dangerous indeed.

McCain: thought it amusing to set a Beach Boys song to the words, "bomb, bomb, bomb; bomb, bomb Iran." Again, such a lackadaisical attitude towards the life and death of innocent civilians and once more, a play for Jewish endorsement with the ghoulish, vulture-esque, pro-war Jew, Joe Lieberman permanently at his side, leering at the prospect of the Vice Presidency like some grotesque, dribbling gargolye. No thanks, pal.

Obama: ostensibly a peace-seeker which is somewhat refreshing, but overly preoccupied with the plight of the po' black folks and slavery reparations from Whitey. Also of course, a Negro (never an advantage in my book) with close ties to half the Jewish-owned merchant banks in Wall Street. Likewise tainted by the stain of Big Jewry and consequently totally unsuitable for office.

Can we please have a forth choice on the ballot: "None of the above. Go to hell the lot of you craven, self-seeking, fraudulent, lying, disingenuous, rapacious, pieces of treasonous crypto-Jewish shit."
There. That ought to cover it.

The public education system is spying on our children

There have been some suspicious changes to the way our kids are being educated over the last few decades. The most marked has been in the piecemeal lowering of academic standards. What proportion of our young people now read books? I read somewhere it was a miserable 2-3%. This situation is playing out right across the Western world, so once again, it is clearly a co-ordinated move and not mere coincidence. This attack on kids' understanding of the world takes many forms. The most obvious is the 'dumbing down' of the schools' syllabuses; teaching the children less and to a lower standard year-on-year. Another method is watering down exam questions, so it APPEARS children are still doing well when they're most decidedly NOT. Yet another scam is in allocating study periods to garbage/filler subjects which do nothing to improve the students' marketability in career terms. Maths, geography and English lessons are being cut back to facilitate the study of such worthless events as the Holocaust (tm) and the slave trade. I'm sure potential employers find good grades in these novel subjects makes young people far more employable, don't you, reader? They're leaving school semi-literate at best and can't even add-up, yet they can tell you all about how much we owe to the Negro and his fellow sufferer, the Jew. The pattern is pervasive and unmistakable. Western governments do NOT want the public schools to turn out bright, intelligent and capable young people. This may strike some newcomers to conspiracy theories as plain crazy, but it's 100% true and a few hours' research on the internet will confirm it.

Brighter kids who've escaped the horrors of the "no child left behind" initiative and hope to go on to university and the professions fair little better, for the syllabuses THEY are obliged to follow are clearly all about influencing and snooping into their still ripening political beliefs. For example, in Europe over the past few years, an enormous amount of time is given over to discussing immigration and its pros and cons - a suspiciously large amount at that. The teachers seem invariably pro-mass migration and try to instill an appreciation for it in their young charges. French students for their Bacalaureat (an important exam taken at age 18) where told the history of Pakistanis emigrating in large numbers to Britain in the 1960s and asked to write a detailed essay on the matter. Some other students in Holland were given an imaginary scenario to deal with: a young Dutch girl had fallen in love with an illegal immigrant from west Africa and had a child by him. Subsequently, the scenario went on, the Dutch authorities caught up with him and held him in custody pending deportation. The students were asked to write a sympathetic, supportive letter to this imaginary Dutch girl, to help her come to terms with her impending loss. You might think that is a pretty harmless, if goofy, assignment. But you'd be wrong. There is a "spectrum of sympathy" for young women in that position and this assignment (and others like it such as the Pakistan migration above) are designed to elicit the student's personal and private view of immigration and immigrants.

For the sake of illustration, say Student A writes: "Dear ==, I was so horrified to read of your terrible ordeal at the hands of the immigration agency. I can't tell you how sad I feel for you. But please, please don't give up hope. There are a number of legal mechanisms available to get such inhumane decisions appealed and hopefully reversed so please don't despair. I hope that in due course, everything works out well for you both after this awful business is over." Now consider Student B's missive: "Dear ==, I have been informed about your sorry plight and am simply astonished how you got yourself into this terrible mess. What on earth were you doing dating a black man? And an illegal immigrant at that? And now you have a child by him? You must be totally crazy. I'd like to offer you some words of comfort as I wouldn't wish your situation on anyone, but the fact of the matter is that you've behaved very stupidly and are the author of your own misfortune. If you're serious about this guy and he can't stay in Holland, then the only proper thing for you to do is to follow him back to Africa with the baby and make a new life there."

Now these students have both been tricked into betraying their inner views on a very controversial subject, because believe me, the New World Order program revolves around mass movements of people from one part of the globe to another and mass migration on an unprecedented scale is at the very core of it. That seemingly innocuous exercise of letter-writing will have a life-long effect over the careers of both students. Notes will be made of the attitude of every respondent towards migration and any other matter pertinent to the NWO program that the school may have been able to discover. Said notes will be quietly tucked away somewhere until needed, as one day they will - when these future graduate students go out into the big wide world to seek work. Some students are going to find doors always open for them; the others are going to find things very much tougher - all because of some long-forgotten homework assignment of maybe 7 years earlier. In fact student B may NEVER be able to work out why she can't get a break in a secure, well-paid government job with prospects and why the federal and state authorities won't even grant her an interview.

Now this process of secretly eliciting personal political views from school students that I have outlined above, is a long-running one that has been in place for at least 3 decades (in the case of the UK probably more). Consequently, many of the people now in very influential government and local authority positions are the beneficiaries of this deceitful and underhanded snooping. They were the ones who innocently revealed left-wing tendencies very many years ago and now the town halls, the quangos, the newspapers, the TV stations, schools and universities, state and federal offices are crawling with them. There's no chance or coincidence at work here - these people have been SELECTED on account of their 'progressive' Liberal/Internationalist views. This entrenchment of the Liberal/Internationalist cabal in positions of power and influence is one of the biggest obstacles we have to face in our quest to tear-up the New World Order agenda and take America back to its Negro-free, Apple Pie and Doris Day cultural roots. It's going to be a long, tough fight, too. We were all fast asleep until a few years ago whereas these "One-World Schemers" have been drawing their plans against us and working to wipe us out for some 60 years now. Whoever said that "the price of liberty is eternal vigilance" was dead right.