If Africans are equal to everyone else, why haven't any of them....

.
Composed a symphony?

Written and produced a hit Broadway show?

Written any critically-acclaimed prose or verse?

Discovered some new fundamental property of the universe?

Exported anything anyone would want to actually BUY from Africa apart from stuff that's dug out the ground or grows naturally?

Given up chopping off the limbs of babies and raping and murdering women?

Given up the practice of female genital mutilation?

Achieved any outstanding ability in anything other than breeding?

Found any cures for any tropical diseases, as opposed to simply spreading them?

Achieved any outstanding ability in anything other than destroying what hard working europeans have built up?

Come up with an internationally-popular cuisine, like virtually ever other culture? When was the last time you went out and 'ate African'?

Won any notable quiz shows to prove they're as smart as the rest of us?

Made any lasting and meaningful contribution to peace on the African continent?

Farmed land productively so as to alleviate the chronic food shortages in Africa?

Designed and mass-produced a vehicle that actually runs AT ALL?

Got anything to show for the billions of dollars in aid that they've been deluged with over many decades now?

COULD IT BE THAT BLACKS ARE 'LESS EQUAL' THAN WE'VE BEEN LED TO BELIEVE? IS IT POSSIBLE WE'VE BEEN LIED TO ABOUT THEM?

Re-branding the Black Folks

Those of us who do NOT have our faces pressed up hard against a TV screen to watch the emetic 'American Idol' finals and similar such drivel that the mainstream jewsmedia inflicts upon us on an all-too-frequent basis may have noticed a tendency among the apparatchiks who control our lives to periodically re-brand various assorted wasters with a sympathetic image makeover.

Consider early general terminology for black people. I recall a very old cartoon strip from the late 1880s entitled: "The Adventures of Sambo - the Little Nigger Boy." Now, at the time this strip was published, no one took offense at it; not even Negroes (among whom it was in fact quite popular). It was an affectionate rendering of the life experiences of one little black kid growing up in the southern states of America.

Phaedrus happened upon a few scans of this cartoon strip that had been posted to a web site, and its appearance there prompted some thinking about the way in which STUFF is periodically revised and re-branded and why such re-branding is felt to be necessary in the first place.

Races are in many ways very much like well-known brands. Some have more marketability (and consequently value) than others. I believe it is the marketing industry that can help us understand this periodic re-branding of Negroes in the national consciousness.

Cast your mind back several decades. By what general description were Negroes known back then? It all depends on your age and which period is under discussion, of course. Go back farthest and you will typically encounter the use of the term "Nigger." Now, during the period this word was most commonly in use, it was NOT generally regarded as a term of outright abuse, but rather casual derision at worst.

Fast forward some years later and the word "Nigger" that so many people now regard as unacceptable had been replaced by "Negro" - which for very many years (like in the 1950s and 1960s) was regarded as a perfectly reasonable term to apply to black folks. Some years later still, and the revised term became "colored" - and it then became taboo to continue to refer to black people as 'Negroes.'

"Coloreds" enjoyed a pretty good run, but eventually that term likewise became regarded as outdated and taboo. Those who define what we may or may not say then coined the term "blacks" which has had its run and likewise now nears expiry in favor of the latest permissible variation: "African-American."

You may be forgiven for wondering why all this periodic re-branding of a race is really necessary? What is the point of it all and what does it achieve? Well, dear reader, it's all about connotations. Political Correctness is a doctrine that holds to the belief that you can make a turd smell better by calling it something nicer. You may have noticed with, for example, the term "Gay" - which recently has come to mean "dreadful" or "rubbish" - and is consequently severely in need of a makeover!

Allow me to explain: Africans are essentially feral peoples with no moral framework within which to constrain their wilder impulses. Consequently, they simply go out and satisfy their fundamental urges to rape, kill, murder and rob with no moral compass to curb their worst excesses. Naturally, folks who go around exhibiting such behaviour quickly acquire a reputation for themselves which then reflects badly upon the community as a whole from which they come.

Once rape, drug-dealing, murder and robbery become synonymous with a certain ethnic grouping; said grouping becomes tainted and quite properly ostricised. No decent people want anything to do with them for perfectly proper reasons - like self-preservation for one. So what do the Liberal 'progressive thinkers' come up with? A facelift for the grouping in question; a re-branding, in fact. No longer will Niggers be called Niggers; they'll be called Negroes instead. That way the stigma of bestiality will no longer attach to them in general. That's the theory, anyway.

For younger people who know no better, this plan turns out to be surprisingly effective. Races, for deeply-rooted cultural and biological reasons, basically never change. Blacks by whatever name continue to behave like jungle animals, but with the benefit of Liberal re-branding in the media, they get something of an 'image makeover' every few years. The conduct with which their former tag had become associated dies a death, because there is no longer a grouping that one is permitted to apply it to. Said group is now termed something else. The world has moved on.

All through the last 70 years or so, the busybody Liberal labelers have been periodically re-inventing various people's images. When decent folk continue to refer to these savages by their former, more accurate descriptions, they are accused of being retrogressive racists and bigoted reactionaries as opposed to what they really are - honest folks who simply refuse to go along with this mass deception and are resolved to continue to call a 'spade' a 'spade' so the onus falls to the blacks THEMSELVES to address their behavior and clean up their image - and not on US to attempt to do it FOR THEM.

So, to sum-up: 'Niggers' acquired a bad name for their bestial behavior. The political solution was to call them 'Negroes' instead; a fresh start on a clean sheet for the same undeserving people. Inevitably, continued bad behavior eventually became associated with the new term 'Negroes', so the answer was another makeover. 'Negroes' were henceforward to be referred to as 'Coloreds' and everything would be fine again - for a while at least.

Inevitably, the term 'Coloreds' eventually became associated with drugs, rape, one-parent families, poverty, ignorance and AIDS so those wacky Liberals then re-branded them as 'blacks' and gave them yet another fresh start. Kindly note that in all these various image makeovers, only the NAMES change. The behavior of the ethnic African remains the one constant factor. Yet WE are EXPECTED to fall in line with this phony nomenclature, lest we be branded as 'racists' and 'bigots'!

2008: up to date once again! Now we're undergoing yet another transition where 'blacks' have acquired such a fearful reputation for murderous brutality that the powers that be are foisting on us the term 'African-Americans' to describe them. So here's yet ANOTHER fresh start for the folks who never seem to be able to settle into civilized, western society. This is why Phaedrus never bought in to the name-change game and will continue to refer to these people by the universally-accepted late '60s term, Negro - which is simply means 'black' in Latin.

One last thought: how many times throughout history has it been necessary for WHITE PEOPLE to avail themselves of this ruse? None! No surprise there, then. Ok, we have our asswipes, too. The likes of George Bush, Dick Cheney, Dog the Bounty Hunter and Madonna don't exactly show us in a good light. But these are exceptions and are thankfully swamped by the vast majority of decent, hard-working and moral white folks. The same cannot truthfully be said of the 'black community.'

FUCK OFF, HILLARY IT´S OVER ALREADY!

'Hill the Shill' must be getting really desperate! Imagine having to appeal for support among white folks of all people!

Source: Western Voices

Item begins...

Suddenly white people count

Defeated Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton has finally reached the bottom of her ammunition box, demanding that the Democratic "super delegates" ignore her repeated (and huge) caucus and primary defeats and back her plan to steal the presidential nomination from Barack Obama at the Denver convention in August. Why? Because, suddenly, white people matter.

"I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on," she told a reporter for USA TODAY, brandishing an Associated Press article, which, she said, "found how Senator Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again, and how whites in both states who had not completed college were supporting me. There's a pattern emerging here." In Clintonspeak, that means those bitter blue collar rednecks who cling to guns and religion and dabble in xenophobia aren't going to vote for the black guy come November.

Clinton continued: "These are the people you have to win if you're a Democrat in sufficient numbers to actually win the election. Everybody knows that."

"Hard-working Americans, white Americans"? "These people"? How are the mighty fallen! Needless to say, the blogosphere (along with the old media) is going crazy with the news.

Clinton, whose whole career has been based on antiwhite political correctness, booted Geraldine Ferraro from her campaign for saying much less. But the wiliness of the Clintons is the stuff of legend and knows no shame.

For months Hillary's campaign has attempted to paint Barack Obama obliquely as "the black candidate," while still cynically hoping to attract black votes. Some observers have even claimed that the Hillary campaign purposely threw the early South Carolina primary, dominated as the state is by black Democrats, in order to drive home the racial point to blue collar whites as well as to hispanics, who, cognizant of the stakes in protected class racial politics, have remained wary of having a black president.

White people of Hillary's class have little to no negative experience with affirmative action. How sweet it is to see her now, finally, feel something of the pain white working people have been made to suffer while being ignored by powerful whites like Hillary and her husband. Perhaps this woman, whose only "qualification" is to have been the wife of "America's first black president," should consider the consequences of the bitter fruit she, and the ideology she represents, helped to sow.

The only downside to seeing Hillary being forced to beg white people for support on racial grounds like this, along with the very public and open self destruction of the Democrats on racial lines, is that there is no workable alternative in 2008. The open borders madman John McCain is at least just as bad as Hillary or Barack Obama. But McCain and his fellow conservative sellouts haven't yet learned the lesson Hillary is now getting a crash course in. Many whites will vote for McCain viscerally as the white candidate, but that kind of blind support is drying up, fast. Nature hates a vacuum, and sellouts on both sides of the aisle should dread the day white people in America finally find the will and program to fill it.

"WTF?? someone dun stole muh dick!!!"

Invariably when those of us in the real world write anything about Africa, it´s never anything positive. This item no exception, but it IS highly amusing, nevertheless. Therefore it´s included today just to lighten the mood a little. And no, it´s not made up, honest! There´s a link to a mainstream jewsmedia site so you can verify it for yourselves. Enjoy....

Source: BBC news: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/1678996.stm

Benin alert over 'penis theft' panic
Mopeds in Cotonou
Illiteracy rates are high and many are very superstitious
The authorities in Benin have ordered security forces to curb violence in the commercial capital, Cotonou, following the deaths of five people by vigilantes

There have been reports of at least 10 such attacks since Saturday.

Four of those who died were burned, another man was hacked to death.

Correspondents say that mobs have attacked indivduals accused of using magic to steal men's penises.

The belief that men's private parts can mysteriously disappear through a handshake or an incantation is commonplace in Benin where superstition and illiteracy are rife.

Stripped naked

The BBC's Karim Okanla in Cotonou says these attacks begin by someone screaming that that they have been robbed of their penis.


An angry mob would then descend on any passer-by deemed to look suspicious, strip them naked and then douse them in petrol before setting them alight.

No one in the crowd would stop to question their actions or ask whether the accused might possess magical powers, he says.

Our correspondent adds that there have been some lucky escapes for people.

An angry mob almost necklaced a photojournalist who happened to be passing by whilst a crowd was hunting for a suspect.

Another example, he says, was when a high school principal narrowly escaped death, after a mob objected to him sheltering a man they had been chasing in his school.

One report said three of the people torched were foreigners.

David Duke puts Obama in the Picture...

In an open letter to Obama, David Duke spells out exactly why decent Americans are sick and tired of being treated like second-class citizens in their own country. Somebody had to say what we're all thinking!

Letter begins:

Mr. Obama:

I believe White Americans are increasingly bitter for good reasons. They are indeed frustrated. But again, they have good reasons for that frustration.

Better-qualified White students, employees, working men and women face intensive racial discrimination that you and the other major candidates deceptively call “affirmative action.”

Many White people can no longer use the public school system that their own taxes pay for because “people who aren’t like them” have made their schools awash in violence, educational mediocrity, drugs, sexual degeneracy and gangsta rap.

Millions of White people who have paid exorbitant taxes all their lives can’t afford medical insurance and decent medical care in no small part because “people who aren’t like them,” such as illegal immigrants and able-bodied, welfare parasites, people who have paid no taxes at all, have overloaded the the system.

Millions of White people see that illegal immigrants, “people who aren’t like them,” are illegally crossing the American border and they see clearly that politicians like you, Clinton and McCain won’t even enforce our laws.

They are bitter because unelected economic czars such as Greenspan and Bernanke, Wolfowitz and a whole coterie of Jewish “people who aren’t like them” have ripped them off and have let so-called “free trade” destroy the American economy.

They are bitter because other Jewish Neocon “people who are not like them,” have led us into a catastrophic war for Israel in Iraq, a war that will cost the American people trillions of dollars and that has killed or ruined tens of thousands of American lives (While Jewish dead or wounded are spectacularly underrepresented in those terrible casualties).

White Americans are sick of the fact that their streets are so damned dangerous from “people who are not like them” that they appropriately “cling to guns.”

Christian Americans are also sick of the fact that the Christian meanings of Christmas are being driven from public life, with crosses and nativity scenes banned from public land in our nation’s capital while at Chanukah a huge Jewish Menorah, symbol of Jewish ethnocentrism and Jewish resistance to assimilation, is put across from the White House and dedicated by the Jewish extremists of Habad Lubavitch, vicious anti-Gentiles who claim that Gentiles are little more than animals with “satanic souls.” Of course, in response to the attack on the values, mores and faith of the American non-Jewish, White majority, that “they cling to their religion.” They marvel how they see billions of dollars of their tax money support the “Jewish state” of Israel, but also see it is forbidden to even refer to America as a “Christian nation.”

I realize why you made the comments at a heavily-Jewish, closed-door, no press allowed meeting. Their agenda is not the same as our agenda. The (Jewish) Council of Presidents, an alliance of the biggest and most powerful Jewish organizations in America has exactly the same sentiments as you enunciated in your speech. It is fanatically for open borders, free trade and of course, for gun control. You are their puppet.

You say that you are for the working people, the middle class American, but in reality your biggest single campaign contributor is the Jewish extremist, Goldman Sachs Corporation. Those at Goldman Sachs, are the same extremists that have led America to its economic and social catastrophe. They are the elite of the elite of American politics and media, the heart of the new 21st century American establishment. And, just like the elitist crowd you addressed in San Francisco, they are people not like the average White person in America, not in values, heritage, or interests. Your audience itself was truly “people who aren’t like them.”

The American people need not explain their frustrations. They have legitimate frustrations, and legitimate anger at politics as usual in America.

But, you sir, are a hypocrite, one who says he represents change, but only offers more of the same relentless attack upon the White people of this country and the values and views of White people. Stop trying to pretend otherwise. You, Clinton, and McCain, should run for President of Israel, or Uganda, or Mexico. Not one of you should get a single White American’s vote. You and your other two comrades for President are controlled lock, stock and barrel by, as you say, “people who aren’t like them.”

David Duke

www.davidduke.com

White Relationships

.
Phaedrus came upon this essay on News from the West and it merits republishing here as the author obviously has a keen grasp on what is wrong in Western society today. In fact I believe it goes a long way to explaining the surge in suicides among young white men in the 80s and 90s. Enjoy...



White Relationships
By Joseph Bishop


White men and women today, instead of loving and helping each other

towards a positive racial future, are often instead deeply suspicious of

each other, alienated from each other, even sometimes ‘at war with’ each

other. These attitudes and trends lead to the smashup of white

marriages, the disintegration of white families, and the prevention of the

formation of long-term and serious relationships, marriage, and large

white families.



What drives this? A major cause is Jewish feminism, which in

quasi-Marxist terms promotes gender division as a sort of modified class

division. It falsely posits a ‘victim class’ - women - struggling to free

itself from the ‘oppressor class’ - men - and teaches that marriage and

family are forms of slavery to women. It additionally teaches that

sexuality is for pleasure and not for responsible procreation, and that love

and romance are tools used by the oppressor class to fixate and entrap

women.



The very idea of the traditional healthy white family unit of man,

woman, and their biological offspring, living under one roof and in

harmony, sharing life and its toils and joys together, pooling skills and

dividing responsibilities for the greater good of the unit, is a nightmare

vision to feminists. ANY other reality is preferable to them.



Men and women alike are taught to pursue money and to work relentlessly

to increase their material assets. Personal relationships are thought

to get in the way of this, to block the acquisition of money and toys.

This is materialism as self-indulgence. It is the Jewish way, not

the way of white people. It reflects a Judeocentric culture projecting

its anti-values upon the host population.



Women are today taught to not allow themselves to become dependent

upon men financially or emotionally. To strive to be ‘independent’ and

‘strong’ and to emotionally separate themselves from men. Thus many

otherwise healthy and promising white relationships often dissolve into

nothing. They are simply poisoned by these types of evils.



Another problem is that of personal over-valuation, the egotistic

belief that one gender is a sort of ‘gift’ to the other, and must be ‘paid

for’ or otherwise compensated massively. Beautiful women often pursue

wholly unrealistic goals for life companionship, thinking themselves

‘worth millions’ and snubbing any man not measuring up. Even unattractive

white women from the lower end of our gene pool embrace unrealistic

levels of self-esteem and make unreasonable demands or embrace absurd

expectations.



‘Security’ was once thought to be well represented in the form of men

of good character, good protectors as well as providers, men who stayed

with their women to conceive and raise many children. This has been

replaced today with the equation of security with money. That the

greater the accumulation of money or earning power of a man, the greater

his worth. This has resulted, for example, in the sorry match-ups of many

genetically valuable white women with Jewish men who make their

millions through lying, thievery, manipulating stocks and bonds, who enrich

themselves through lives that are merely predatory and exploitive.



The result of these matchups are not the conception of new Michelangelos,

Shakespeares, Nietzsches, or Goethes, but more Milkens, Ginzburgs,

Fagins, and other race pollution.



Mass media in all its forms encourages ‘relationships’ that are little

more than animal couplings with zero responsibility and complete freedom.

Men and women living together unmarried is defined as a ’lifestyle

choice’ as are interracial and gay and lesbian couplings.



Added to this is the extreme materialism pervading our Judeocentric

culture, wherein white men will demand (and receive) sexual favors for

outlays of cash in one form or another, while white women will withhold

sexual favors unless and until their aforesaid perception of ‘security’

and ’total fulfillment’ is handsomely met.



In the recent past and for most of white history, the white family unit

was the norm. It provided stability for the culture and for society

and transmitted healthy racial values and behavioral norms generationally.

But today we live in a ‘divorce culture’ wherein a majority of marriages

become divorces, where vows are ‘just words’, and where children grow up

with single parents and live dysfunctional lives.



Many men see what happens to other men in divorce proceedings. They

see men stripped of their homes, separated from their children, and

turned into ‘disposable’ dads wherein they become ‘wallets’ instead of

individuals helping to raise their own children. They want no part of that

process and become reluctant to enter into serious relationships, let

alone marriage.



Women and girls are deluged with endless television programming in

which white men are portrayed as predators, wife-beaters, seeking to

dominate and exploit women, even murdering them. They too see the

skyrocketing divorce rates. Many of them wish to avoid serious relationships

and marriage because of these exaggerated dangers and risks.



Further complicating this is the growing prevalence of white men simply

giving up on their women and seeking mates from overseas. White men

pursuing and marrying non-white women from the Philippines, China, Latin

America, or elsewhere, is one consequence of the ‘princess’ mentality

so frequently indulged by white women. These ‘princesses’ often only

discover far too late that their expectations were unreasonable, and

they remain single all their lives. Meanwhile white men who marry

non-whites often find their lives frustrating and the racial/cultural divide

too vast to bridge, ultimately resulting in divorce.



The relationship of man-wife has become increasingly unstable. Single

parenthood is today more the norm than the exception. Women are taught

that they can ‘have it all’ on their own: complete freedom, their own

empowerment and independence, total control over their children (if they

have any), and the power - thanks to chauvinist/misandrist courts -

to jettison fathers/husbands and reduce them to the status of distant,

disempowered wallets. Government itself enshrines this by becoming

ersatz husband and father, providing an array of programs and subsidies to

single mothers, as well as special protections and powers given the

mother to control the lives of herself, her children, and even much of the

life (and income) of the ex-husband/father.



All of this is disastrous for our race and future.



White men and white women have probably never led more unhappy lives,

more frustrating lives, or experienced as much bitterness and confusion

about relationships and gender issues as today.



A relationship today can be just about anything. Any gender, any race,

any age, and the relationship itself for any purpose. The very idea

of a relationship predicated on responsibility both to one’s race as

well as to each other is considered anathema to many, as something

strange and alien.



This also applies to the family. The traditional family has now been

largely displaced by the ‘sort of’ family. For example, in this family

a father is not needed anymore and if one must be there at all, he can

be anyone: a boyfriend, a new husband, someone of the same gender, a

neighbor, a teacher, anyone at all. Even the children can be anyone.

They can be adoptees from the other side of the world and from a totally

alien race.



The less inherent meaning and purposeful value that a relationship, a

marriage, or a family are given today, the easier their breakup or

prevention in the first place. Jewish deconstructionism has worked to

make white relationships meaningless.



It is up to white racialists to set a standard here, to set an example.

To understand race values and what serves the race and what retards

its interests. To have the courage to stand against Judeocentric

anti-values, to speak up, to not move with the trendy herd but instead to

adopt race-affirming lifestyles for other whites to see and to emulate.



It is possible to merge the best race-serving elements of white tradition

with respect to courtship, marriage, and family, while at the same

time strongly infusing race values into each element. To adopt the best

personal attitude and sense of responsibility, to live one’s life in the best

and most healthy eugenic manner and regardless of how others view this.



Most white people today are confused and unhappy in all matters related

to relationships, and seek something better. They need to see a white

racialist model of relationships, of marriage, and of family life that works,

and that represents something positive and desirable to them. It is up to

each individual racialist to make those choices and to work to provide

those models.







The author can be contacted at:

Revisionist21@aol.com





Copyrighted by Joseph Bishop

All rights reserved.

Congoleeza to the Rescue!

Don't panic, folks! Everyone's favorite aviation fuel-guzzling Negress, Congoleeza Rice has pledged to generate yet more greenhouse gases in trying to keep up the pretense that there's still a real peace dialog going on in the Middle East. If there’s a Nobel Prize for Futility, she’s a shoe-in!

Who Are the REAL Racists?

It's interesting to note CNN's racial breakdown figures for supporters of Obama and Clinton. Almost exactly 50% of white Democrats support Obama as against Hillary; whereas he enjoys fully two-thirds of the black vote. So no color prejudice on the part of the white constituency, but plenty on the part of the black. I wonder how many white folks out there will spot the irony of this situation? Vanishingly few, I imagine. And fewer still will so much as discuss it for fear of being labeled "racist!"

Invest in Africa!

.

Sounds like a great idea, doesn't it? Well, perhaps not SUCH a great idea to the well-informed constituency of Phaedrus' core readership. But nevertheless, there are a number of Western financial corporations that have recently taken to extolling us to place our hard earned cash in the dark continent where we can - so they claim - enjoy spectacular returns! Gee whiz, we finally get something BACK from Africa? Sound to good to be true? Well they wouldn't lie to us, would they?

Sadly they are indeed peddling junk. How these people can keep a straight face while they're promoting African 'investments' is quite remarkable. They DO admit, as much however, when they describe Africa as the LAST great emerging market opportunity. In other words, every OTHER place on planet earth has had investment up to its ass; they're maxed-out investment wise and Africa's the very LAST place left that nobody except the Chinese have pumped a single buck into for obvious reasons (Kenya, Liberia, Sierra Leone, DR Congo and Zimbabwe to name just five).

Sure, China has invested Big Bucks in Africa, but they've done so very smartly. They have not backed African businesses. They are not venture capitalists in this basket-case continent. They have taken cynical positions which just grab a share of Africa's mineral wealth. They're not betting on smart Africans' entrepreneurship, for as we all know, there ain't none! Nope, the Chinese just want to grab the minerals, precious metals and oil. Any useless piece of shit can dig a hole in the ground. It's not beyond the average African to wield a shovel. Not on a good day, anyway.

In any event, having carefully analyzed African investment opportunities as outlined above, Phaedrus himself has a bit of investment advice which folks with a few thousand dollars to spare might find valuable. Rather than invest in Africa, just bundle up your wad of cash and flush it down the toilet. The returns are precisely the same, and you have the added satisfaction of knowing that your hard-earned cash hasn't swollen some fat, corrupt African dictator's Swiss bank account. Plus you don't pay no middleman, and you save a pile on paperwork! As an infamous Nigerian government minister once smilingly said: "That'll be $46m please."

Yet Another Black Hate Killing in London!

This is not really topical for this blog as regular readers will know, but Phaedrus has recently been made aware of the disproportionate numbers of black-on-white killings that now take place as a consequence of becoming better informed on such matters thanks to our brothers-in-keyboards, at the PC-Apostate and their affiliates. But regulars please be patient! For there IS (as always) a Jew somewhere in the niggers' woodpile that will be, in due course, exposed...

Anyway, let's cut to the chase and report the Truth (which Phaedrus had to DIG for extensively, since it was 'curiously' buried on page122 of the UK's 'Daily Motion'....)

"A 19 year-old [white, ethnically-English guy] by the name of Ian Page has had his short life abruptly ended by the actions of [three black savages,] who kicked him to death because they believed he didn't accord them the 'rezpekt' they felt they deserved.
"The three [all negroes,] Lloyd Henry, 20, Jermaine Yateman, 19, and Andre Campbell, 24 were all convicted of murder at London's famous criminal courthouse, the 'Old Bailey'. The vicious killing, which took place nearly a year ago arose out of a simple, unintended slight. Mr. Page accidentally brushed against one of his killers as he passed them in the city's Edgeware Road. This innocent mishap - in the killers' minds - warranted Death."

Though one might at first sight see no culpability on the part of the Jew here, further examination of the case makes it obvious that culpability there certainly IS. It is via the Jews' ever-present and all-encompassing media outlets that the negro has been instilled with the notion that 'respekt' is somehow his right - and that anyone who fails to show him same is deserving of instant, summary and bloody justice. This is a deadly fantasy that the Jews have made reality today thanks to their influence over the movie industry.

When the Jew uses his omnipresent media apparatus to disseminate the propaganda that the Negro is somehow... "not to be fucked with" it instills in the Negro mind a kind of false pride he feels he must live up to – and all too frequently with deadly consequences.

When crimes like this happen, it isn't only the Negro that merits the noose, it's the JEW that gave him ideas WAY above his station and thereby encouraged such insane retaliation in the first place. World Jewry is the Chess-master and it has made the rest of us; black, white, Muslim, Christian, Hindu, agnostic and atheist, its pawns. There will never be a peaceful and logical order of things until the machinations of the Jew are removed from public affairs, around the world, for all time.

Meredith Kercher - an unspeakably ugly black-on-white sex murder

But who ever heard of a white-on-black sex murder??

If anyone with any sense needed any FURTHER proof to accept that no good EVER comes from white women fraternizing with Negroes, then this case has surely got to be it. You can't warn your kids often enough, given the saturation media coverage the Jews give to portray Negroes as "maybe-dangerous-yet-relatively-harmless" and "cool."

If you're a white parent of a white child, then you have to drum this message into them over and over and over again, if only to counteract the poisonous messages coming from the jewsmedia. Tell them they can rebel against you in other less dangerous yet still shocking ways than being murdered; because fraternizing with Negroes is highly likely to end in an horrific death.

The Italian police criminalistics department state that it took British student, Meredith Kercher, age 20, over two hours to die after having her throat slit by an illegal immigrant; a sex-mad black rapist whose clumsy sexual overtures she quite rightly rejected. Had she avoided contact with the white whore room-mate who enjoyed fucking niggers, however, she'd be here today and her family would not be so utterly devastated.

If this rather obvious message has fallen on the deaf ears of the politically-correct among us, then there's nothing more Phaedrus can say other than this: worry for yourself and your family no more because Darwinism will ensure you and your offspring end up where you belong. Smart genes always win through in the end. All you need to do is nothing; just continue let your kids watch Fox, MTV, TRL and the rest.

The first ever African Excellence Award!

As you may imagine, the word "excellence" is relative and depends were in the world you are - certainly in THIS context, anyway...

"Joaquim Chissano, the former president of Mozambique, has won the first annual African Award for Excellence in Leadership."
[let's face it: this award has got to be some kind of JOKE, hasn't it? I'll translate the rest of this bullshit from the BBC World website into everyday English...]

"The Award goes to the African leader who has done the LEAST amount of damage to his country (slightly different from the
usual standards applicable in the West - although not by THAT much, lately, it seems.)

Joaquim Chissano has been judged as the African leader who has LEAST bled his country dry of its natural resources and capital.

He has also agreed to fewer female genital mutilations being carried out in his country than any previous African leader.

Furthermore, he has overseen the lowest number of corrupt contracts handed out to friends and relatives.

He has not personally raped THAT many young women, nor sired more than maybe 20-30 illegitimate children at most.

He has drastically cut the number of child murders carried out in the country to less than 18,000 per year.

He has reluctantly agreed to end the practice of chopping off the limbs of babies - thereby breaking with established African tradition.

Witch doctors who recommend the 'treatment' of black men raping babies to rid themselves of AIDS are to lose their licenses to practice 'medicine.'


So there we go: a brave new Africa awaits - thanks to Chissano, and if all the other leaders follow his example, then the entire continent may yet be saved!

Britain may take DNA from ALL its citizens!

A massive invasion of privacy or a vitally-important crime-fighting tool?

One of Britain's most senior judges, Lord Justice Sedley, has made quite an astonishing plea to the UK government. He wants to see the country's existing DNA database (which at present holds information on convicted persons) expanded to include samples from EVERYONE in the UK AND everyone visiting it!

Leaving aside the issue of visitors for a moment (though if implemented it will no doubt hit tourism there pretty badly) this idea does throw up some interesting possibilities and Phaedrus is of the view that it shouldn't be rejected entirely out of hand.

For a start, DNA evidence not only nails the guilty, it protects the innocent from being unjustly convicted. Secondly, DNA evidence is currently of most value in detecting the perpetrators of sex crimes and murder - both of which are predominantly carried out by blacks against whites. It would surely also encourage black males who simply can't keep their dicks under control to wear a condom when raping their victims.

But there's another VITALLY useful application for such an extension to Britain's existing database that should really spur us on to adopt such a system here, too. Just imagine; there would be no more Occult Jews wriggling their way into positions of public trust. No Jew would be able to hide under a false, westernized name and thereby pass him/herself off as being of european decent. We could EASILY vet all our future politicians, judges, lawyers, doctors, newspaper proprietors, broadcasters and so on for any genetic link to David's line.

Without such a system in place, we continue to be at risk from being infiltrated by Jews continuing to pass themselves off as normal human beings as opposed to what they REALLY are: every Goy's mortal enemies. So let us welcome Lord Sedley's proposal and view it not as just another tool for repression, but rather as a valuable resource to make the world of tomorrow a better one for our children.

The Demise of Michael Vick

It is to be hoped that this son of a bitch gets a sentence at the top end of the possible range. Furthermore, it would only be fitting for this nigger to banned for life from any further involvement with the NFL. Breaking news on the wire also suggests that “rap artist” DMX has also just been busted for involvement in dog fighting. If true, it can only be hoped that this similar pile of shit winds up in the slammer for many years to come. Someone once said on the satirical Nigger Mania site, niggermania.com that if dogs could type they'd be there too bashing niggers likewise. Ain't it the truth!