.
Everyone should be familiar with the ethos behind today's Corporate Communism by now: everybody's equal, except that SOME are rather more equal than others. "Those who are equal" means the residents of main street; those that are MORE equal, on the other hand, are the Wall Street Players. Deals that go well and turn a profit are booked down privately to the Players' account; deals that go sour and lose money are booked down to the taxpayers' and heaped onto the National Debt. The Fed can always print more dollars and boy, aren't they always doing so!
So it was confirmed in Nancy Pelosi's proud announcement yesterday that the Zionist money men from the Fed and the upper strata of the 'Financial Community' had reached a consensus approach that will "insulate Wall street from main street." - and so it is - but NOT in the way we would justifiably expect! The average Joe would take this phrase to mean that main street was going to be shielded from Wall Street's self-inflicted idiocy and ordinary folks would therefore be spared from their greed and largess. This technique of the 'implied statement' is one of our politician's most recent inventions. Bush himself uses it frequently, so always read between these phony lines!
Unfortunately for us, it REALLY works the OTHER way around. Want proof? Just see how the markets have joyously reacted in the space of just 12hrs. The champaign corks have really been popping in trading rooms on both sides of the Atlantic! Pelosi was right: Wall street's losses have successfully been shifted once again onto the taxpayers and their children for generations to come, freeing the Players to get back to making profits for the plutocrats once more whist the rest of us Plebs pick up the ever-lengthening tab for their limitless greed and kleptomania.
Phaedrus suggests they enjoy the fruits of their latest THEFT whilst they can, for they are only in reality buying time. The eventual crash isn't going away; not a chance. Even if the great American public remains too lazy and ignorant to do anything right now over this latest outrageous RIP-OFF, they won't have any choice but to finally get up off their butts in due course when the derivatives market collapses taking EVERYTHING else with it. So let the fraudsters, shysters, counterfeiters and their cronies enjoy their respite while they can, for it simply ain't gonna last...!
Showing posts with label liars. Show all posts
Showing posts with label liars. Show all posts
Friday, September 19, 2008
Friday, May 9, 2008
FUCK OFF, HILLARY IT´S OVER ALREADY!
'Hill the Shill' must be getting really desperate! Imagine having to appeal for support among white folks of all people!
Source: Western Voices
Item begins...
Suddenly white people count
Defeated Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton has finally reached the bottom of her ammunition box, demanding that the Democratic "super delegates" ignore her repeated (and huge) caucus and primary defeats and back her plan to steal the presidential nomination from Barack Obama at the Denver convention in August. Why? Because, suddenly, white people matter.
"I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on," she told a reporter for USA TODAY, brandishing an Associated Press article, which, she said, "found how Senator Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again, and how whites in both states who had not completed college were supporting me. There's a pattern emerging here." In Clintonspeak, that means those bitter blue collar rednecks who cling to guns and religion and dabble in xenophobia aren't going to vote for the black guy come November.
Clinton continued: "These are the people you have to win if you're a Democrat in sufficient numbers to actually win the election. Everybody knows that."
"Hard-working Americans, white Americans"? "These people"? How are the mighty fallen! Needless to say, the blogosphere (along with the old media) is going crazy with the news.
Clinton, whose whole career has been based on antiwhite political correctness, booted Geraldine Ferraro from her campaign for saying much less. But the wiliness of the Clintons is the stuff of legend and knows no shame.
For months Hillary's campaign has attempted to paint Barack Obama obliquely as "the black candidate," while still cynically hoping to attract black votes. Some observers have even claimed that the Hillary campaign purposely threw the early South Carolina primary, dominated as the state is by black Democrats, in order to drive home the racial point to blue collar whites as well as to hispanics, who, cognizant of the stakes in protected class racial politics, have remained wary of having a black president.
White people of Hillary's class have little to no negative experience with affirmative action. How sweet it is to see her now, finally, feel something of the pain white working people have been made to suffer while being ignored by powerful whites like Hillary and her husband. Perhaps this woman, whose only "qualification" is to have been the wife of "America's first black president," should consider the consequences of the bitter fruit she, and the ideology she represents, helped to sow.
The only downside to seeing Hillary being forced to beg white people for support on racial grounds like this, along with the very public and open self destruction of the Democrats on racial lines, is that there is no workable alternative in 2008. The open borders madman John McCain is at least just as bad as Hillary or Barack Obama. But McCain and his fellow conservative sellouts haven't yet learned the lesson Hillary is now getting a crash course in. Many whites will vote for McCain viscerally as the white candidate, but that kind of blind support is drying up, fast. Nature hates a vacuum, and sellouts on both sides of the aisle should dread the day white people in America finally find the will and program to fill it.
Source: Western Voices
Item begins...
Suddenly white people count
Defeated Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton has finally reached the bottom of her ammunition box, demanding that the Democratic "super delegates" ignore her repeated (and huge) caucus and primary defeats and back her plan to steal the presidential nomination from Barack Obama at the Denver convention in August. Why? Because, suddenly, white people matter.
"I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on," she told a reporter for USA TODAY, brandishing an Associated Press article, which, she said, "found how Senator Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again, and how whites in both states who had not completed college were supporting me. There's a pattern emerging here." In Clintonspeak, that means those bitter blue collar rednecks who cling to guns and religion and dabble in xenophobia aren't going to vote for the black guy come November.
Clinton continued: "These are the people you have to win if you're a Democrat in sufficient numbers to actually win the election. Everybody knows that."
"Hard-working Americans, white Americans"? "These people"? How are the mighty fallen! Needless to say, the blogosphere (along with the old media) is going crazy with the news.
Clinton, whose whole career has been based on antiwhite political correctness, booted Geraldine Ferraro from her campaign for saying much less. But the wiliness of the Clintons is the stuff of legend and knows no shame.
For months Hillary's campaign has attempted to paint Barack Obama obliquely as "the black candidate," while still cynically hoping to attract black votes. Some observers have even claimed that the Hillary campaign purposely threw the early South Carolina primary, dominated as the state is by black Democrats, in order to drive home the racial point to blue collar whites as well as to hispanics, who, cognizant of the stakes in protected class racial politics, have remained wary of having a black president.
White people of Hillary's class have little to no negative experience with affirmative action. How sweet it is to see her now, finally, feel something of the pain white working people have been made to suffer while being ignored by powerful whites like Hillary and her husband. Perhaps this woman, whose only "qualification" is to have been the wife of "America's first black president," should consider the consequences of the bitter fruit she, and the ideology she represents, helped to sow.
The only downside to seeing Hillary being forced to beg white people for support on racial grounds like this, along with the very public and open self destruction of the Democrats on racial lines, is that there is no workable alternative in 2008. The open borders madman John McCain is at least just as bad as Hillary or Barack Obama. But McCain and his fellow conservative sellouts haven't yet learned the lesson Hillary is now getting a crash course in. Many whites will vote for McCain viscerally as the white candidate, but that kind of blind support is drying up, fast. Nature hates a vacuum, and sellouts on both sides of the aisle should dread the day white people in America finally find the will and program to fill it.
Monday, May 5, 2008
Jewish Debating Techniques #1
Oftentimes a lot of what we read enters the back of our minds at a subconscious level and it lies there, latent and gently percolating away until such time as an outside event prompts our conscious recollection of it. Such it was for Phaedrus with an old Patrick Grimm essay entitled 'The Taboo as Proof' (herewith today re-published below.)Taboos are very useful for putting sensitive subjects beyond debate, as Patrick himself pointed out. The one thing the Jews fear above all else is an even-handed and totally open investigation into their long and checkered history, for the ugliness thereby revealed would be simply beyond the belief of all bar the most heavily initiated of persons. Not surprisingly, therefore, the Jews have developed a series of techniques for stifling debate on such issues and avoiding having to address these sensitive matters AT ALL. This article is about one such technique and its most eloquent exponent, the 'British Jew' Alan Coren, who not-so-sadly died last year.
Those of us who espouse views which are generally taken to be outside the current spectrum of "acceptable opinion" by the popular media will - if we are lucky enough to get a platform in the first place - often find ourselves taken to task in the presence of a Jew by a hostile interviewer who falsely purports to be impartial. Many, many years ago, such encounters were the norm and indeed unfettered, free and open debate was quite properly regarded as the only viable route to establishing the real, underlying truth. But that was some decades ago when the Jewish stranglehold over 'permissible utterances' was very much weaker. I refer of course to those increasingly distant days prior to the advent of political-correctness.
Now, if one has something dreadful to hide for which one can offer no valid excuse, it doesn't benefit one to debate one's beliefs in the media spotlight, for fear of being caught short of an appropriate response to an unwelcome or unexpected question or accusation. The Jew, uniquely, has developed the perfect technique in such awkward situations: 'the disgusted walk-out.'
This 'storm of self-righteous indignation" method offers a number of benefits for any Jewish interviewee who's been caught off-guard on a sensitive issue. Namely:
1. It lends him elevated 'moral authority' - he appears to occupy the high moral ground by virtue of storming off in feigned disgust with his nose in the air, rather than 'lowering himself' to bandy words with those of seemingly fixed opinions hostile to Judaism.
2. It avoids him having to answer any awkward questions concerning his people and their 'interesting history' (such as the Holocaust period or the genocide in Palestine) that his interlocutor might confront him about from out of the blue with hard, indisputable evidence.
3. It creates in the audience a sense of sympathy and respect for the Jew, who though clearly so grievously insulted, exercised immense dignity and self-control by simply walking out, rather than punching his opponent on the nose.
4. Most importantly of course, it enables the Jew to yet again escape scott-free without ever having to address a single allegation made against him, his race, and/or their complex and deeply troubling history.
The Jewish Grand Master of the self-righteous storm-out was a 'British' radio and TV personality by the name of Alan Coren who enjoyed a long and active career in 'journalism' and broadcasting in the US and Britain before finally settling down at the BBC in London (at the license payers' expense, of course). Coren's parents came to Britain between the two World Wars and (like so many other Jewish immigrant families) changed their original name, COHEN, to something less obviously Jewish; in this case, "Coren" - not very imaginative but it nevertheless did the trick. Anyway, Coren's specialty was storming out in self-righteous indignation the moment anyone raised any uncomfortable facts concerning the Tribe of Satan.
Coren/Cohen had it down to a very fine art and really should have been a character actor. The moment anyone ventured into any area that was REMOTELY critical of the Jews or Israel, Coren would assume a deathly grave expression, solemnly gather his papers together, tear-off his microphone and earpiece with well-practiced theatricality, and simply walk out without a word, shaking his head in disgust. Seemingly no one ever worked out that the move was simply a ruse to avoid having to address the issue raised. The Jew Cohen would subsequently enjoy sympathy heaped upon him by empathetic viewers for his noble refusal to get down and dirty with 'racists and anti-Semites.'
So, gentile reader, please remember that Jews who walk out of interviews aren't really offended at all. They simply cannot justify themselves or their kind; they have no answers that the rest of us would deem acceptable. And they KNOW it!
Those of us who espouse views which are generally taken to be outside the current spectrum of "acceptable opinion" by the popular media will - if we are lucky enough to get a platform in the first place - often find ourselves taken to task in the presence of a Jew by a hostile interviewer who falsely purports to be impartial. Many, many years ago, such encounters were the norm and indeed unfettered, free and open debate was quite properly regarded as the only viable route to establishing the real, underlying truth. But that was some decades ago when the Jewish stranglehold over 'permissible utterances' was very much weaker. I refer of course to those increasingly distant days prior to the advent of political-correctness.
Now, if one has something dreadful to hide for which one can offer no valid excuse, it doesn't benefit one to debate one's beliefs in the media spotlight, for fear of being caught short of an appropriate response to an unwelcome or unexpected question or accusation. The Jew, uniquely, has developed the perfect technique in such awkward situations: 'the disgusted walk-out.'
This 'storm of self-righteous indignation" method offers a number of benefits for any Jewish interviewee who's been caught off-guard on a sensitive issue. Namely:
1. It lends him elevated 'moral authority' - he appears to occupy the high moral ground by virtue of storming off in feigned disgust with his nose in the air, rather than 'lowering himself' to bandy words with those of seemingly fixed opinions hostile to Judaism.
2. It avoids him having to answer any awkward questions concerning his people and their 'interesting history' (such as the Holocaust period or the genocide in Palestine) that his interlocutor might confront him about from out of the blue with hard, indisputable evidence.
3. It creates in the audience a sense of sympathy and respect for the Jew, who though clearly so grievously insulted, exercised immense dignity and self-control by simply walking out, rather than punching his opponent on the nose.
4. Most importantly of course, it enables the Jew to yet again escape scott-free without ever having to address a single allegation made against him, his race, and/or their complex and deeply troubling history.
The Jewish Grand Master of the self-righteous storm-out was a 'British' radio and TV personality by the name of Alan Coren who enjoyed a long and active career in 'journalism' and broadcasting in the US and Britain before finally settling down at the BBC in London (at the license payers' expense, of course). Coren's parents came to Britain between the two World Wars and (like so many other Jewish immigrant families) changed their original name, COHEN, to something less obviously Jewish; in this case, "Coren" - not very imaginative but it nevertheless did the trick. Anyway, Coren's specialty was storming out in self-righteous indignation the moment anyone raised any uncomfortable facts concerning the Tribe of Satan.
Coren/Cohen had it down to a very fine art and really should have been a character actor. The moment anyone ventured into any area that was REMOTELY critical of the Jews or Israel, Coren would assume a deathly grave expression, solemnly gather his papers together, tear-off his microphone and earpiece with well-practiced theatricality, and simply walk out without a word, shaking his head in disgust. Seemingly no one ever worked out that the move was simply a ruse to avoid having to address the issue raised. The Jew Cohen would subsequently enjoy sympathy heaped upon him by empathetic viewers for his noble refusal to get down and dirty with 'racists and anti-Semites.'
So, gentile reader, please remember that Jews who walk out of interviews aren't really offended at all. They simply cannot justify themselves or their kind; they have no answers that the rest of us would deem acceptable. And they KNOW it!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
