.
The ancient Greeks are still revered today for their outstanding contributions to the fields of politics and philosophy. One of their more interesting legal statutes was this little gem:
"If a builder builds a house which subsequently falls and kills someone, then that builder's son shall be put to death."
Draconian? Inequitable? Perhaps it sounds that way to us nowadays, but to the Greeks it made perfect sense. The objective was clearly to introduce a powerful deterrent against negligence. That law was obviously framed to punish those who, through carelessness in their trade, caused the death of another. Note here that the Greeks felt it was appropriate to execute the builder's son simply for his father's NEGLIGENCE. The father need not have had any malicious INTENT in his slipshod building work; it was enough that a death had arisen ACCIDENTALLY through his incompetence.
It is interesting to speculate on what the ancient Greeks would have made of the case of New York's Twin Towers, which were PURPOSELY destroyed by design, resulting in the deaths of nearly 3,000 people, many of whom were nobly and desperately struggling to evacuate the buildings shortly before they were finally demolished with explosives, crushing these brave souls under thousands of tons of toxic rubble. I doubt the ancients could even CONCEIVE of such a monstrous act, let alone formulate a suitable punishment for it. But we can still learn a thing or two from their unique brand of ancient wisdom. The Greeks couldn't have known it at the time, but they hit on the perfect solution for eliminating the Dynasty, which has been the scourge of mankind for centuries, and never more so than in our world of today.
When the vast majority of people picture a "dynasty" they typically think of the 'great political families' like the Kennedys or the Peabodys, but the Kennedys and their like fall a good way short of the mark, because they're essentially transient in nature and don't carry the 'poison gene' of wanton destruction, ultimate greed; craven, unlimited power and wealth - and a total indifference towards the terrible sufferings of others that these ruthless, limitless ambitions demand for their fulfillment. This is the point at which most normal people get turned off from conspiracy theory. The insuperable barrier they cannot overcome is due to the phenomenon of what psychologists call "projection." This is the normal human trait in which we attempt to put ourselves in the shoes of others to get inside their minds, by using our own life outlook and experience as a paradigm. This technique is invariably doomed to fail, because there is no valid comparison whatsoever between the world-view of the average man and that of those who comprise the members of the REAL power Dynasties that run this world from the shadows.
Dynasties are basically long-surviving extended families that have amassed great wealth and power. They are secure in their positions because very little of what they're REALLY about, and their TRUE aims ever gets reported. They do, after all, have loyal friends in the media business who protect them from the public gaze at all times. The vast majority of people have NO idea whatsoever the degree of control and influence these Power Families have over our lives, and the extent to which the violently murderous, dysfunctional world we see around us has been shaped and developed by them. Who do we always blame when something goes badly wrong in America - or indeed most European countries? The Government of course! That's who. No one ever looks BEYOND the government. "The buck stops here" meme we have in the back of our minds encourages us to believe (falsely) that presidents and prime-ministers have ultimate responsibility and authority. It's not so at all. It's probably NEVER been so. We talk about puppet governments being installed in places like Afghanistan and Iraq (to name but two) but even sophisticated people don't seem to have realized that Bush in the US, Mrs. Merkel in Germany and Gordon Brown in the UK (and many, many other so-called 'democracies' - are ALSO puppets themselves; mere masks shielding the REAL power which prefers to hide among those shadows in obscurity.
So who exactly are these Power Families? To a great extent, we shall see that they are typically of Jewish stock and trace their roots back to ancient Babylon, where they practiced EXACTLY the same kind of Machiavellian deceit among the ancients that they continue to do here today in the 21st century. Incredible, isn't it? In fact it's SO incredible (to the normal, human mind) that anyone who has suggested the world is being run by a shadowy group of elite bloodlines has been roundly castigated as a 'conspiracy nut' and ridiculed. Well, up until a few years ago that was the typical response, anyway. But now, thanks entirely to the Internet, we live in more enlightened times, and we can peer into those shadows and see the entities pulling the strings of our presidents and prime ministers. There are estimated to be a core of around 300 of these extended, full-blown Dynasties calling all the shots from behind the scenes. They, personally, are responsible for the world we see around us; this world of endless war, famine, poverty, disease, social unrest, internationalism, mass migration - and much else.
So let's name a few:
The Astor Bloodline
The Collins Bloodline
The Bundy Bloodline
The Dupont Bloodline
The Freeman Bloodline
The Li Bloodline
The Onassis Bloodline
The Reynolds Bloodline
The Rockefeller Bloodline
The Rothschild Bloodline
The Russell Bloodline
The Van Duyn Bloodline
The Li Bloodline
The Onassis Bloodline
The Reynolds Bloodline
The Rockefeller Bloodline
The Rothschild Bloodline
The Russell Bloodline
The Van Duyn Bloodline
The ghoulish Merovingians (very little heard of, but possibly No.1 in the entire hierarchy of Evil.
If you go back far enough in time, you will discover that in fact ALL these seemingly disparate families are in fact of one and the same progenitor, who arose somewhere in the Middle East between what are now known as Israel and Iraq.
These figures form the very summit of the pyramid of power that has governed our lives and those of our ancestors, around the world, for thousands of years. In all that time, they have shifted, moved, adapted, morphed and re-invented themselves as the historic period required, yet never in all those thousands of years, has their essential character changed one iota. It is still driven and underpinned by the most bestial and evil of motivations. Why? Because, to put it succinctly, their God is in fact the Devil - Lucifer. Who in their right mind would accept such entities running the world? Yet that is what they are doing and have been doing since time immemorial. That time MUST now come to an abrupt end.
The whole business of empire-building (which is what Dynasties are all about, fundamentally) is concerned with building up massive power, wealth and influence which is then passed down to the next generation, and so on and so on. The families are tightly knit (necessarily so) and tend to keep their bloodlines as pure as possible. The wealth, influence and power are passed down the generations and each generation builds yet more in its lifetime to pass on to the children of the next. This is the one single, common factor that has enabled them and their twisted world view to prevail over all of recorded time - yet it is also their fundamental weakness. Dynasties cannot survive without heirs and heiresses; they would vanish within a few generations and the complexion of the world would consequently lighten immensely. Can you see where I'm heading with this argument, yet? You see, the ancient Greeks had a point. The essence of all Dynasties is the perpetuation of the bloodline. Breaking that bloodline by making the sons (or daughters) pay with their lives for the sins of the fathers (and mothers) is guaranteed to concentrate minds on the part of those who would destroy us. No longer would any of these conspiratorial entities be able to rest easy in the knowledge that they were too old and frail to be tried for their crimes; that they could simply get one of their crooked MD cronies to sign a medical certificate to that effect and escape justice. What good would that do? The revolutionary government will slaughter any and all offspring anyway. End of Dynasty, end of problem. Disarmingly simple isn't it?
Make no mistake about it. Look around you and see where the direction of the Power Families has taken us. It is not the forces of Good that are in control of this world; it is the forces of Evil and destruction: wars, famines, plagues, violence, social unrest - all the calamities that the sight of which is pleasing to their God - Lucifer. It has long been rumored that those who make a pact with the Devil can enjoy enormous wealth, power and fabulous material riches. Years ago, I dismissed such 'bible-talk' as nonsense (or at the very most just some sort of artistically-rendered parable to illustrate the consequences of being tempted away from the path of righteousness. But lately, the jig-saw is increasingly falling into place, and all the pieces fit - perfectly. Consequently, my friends, it is of the utmost importance that these Dynasties are totally destroyed beyond reconstruction, even unto those individuals who have merely a trace of those extended families' blood in them. They must be excised in the manner of a cancer - COMPLETE EXCISION. Leaving the slightest trace of that pernicious genome in existence anywhere on earth will not effect a complete cure. The much-weakened organism will eventually rebuild, and our children's children's children's children will yet again have to face the monster that we now take on in the hope of a final victory. Should we fail this time, free peoples will one day become enslaved again - TRULY enslaved. And next time, it will probably be for ever. Mark these words well, my friends. A peaceful and civilized world demands it.
Showing posts with label NWO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NWO. Show all posts
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
Saturday, July 12, 2008
Read the Irrepressible Curt Maynard!
.
If you look to the 'related sites of interest' section (below left) on this page, you will find an active link to a great patriot's latest blog. It's WELL worth taking a look at this unique resource (Phaedrus and friends strive to do so as often as humanly possible) owing to the kind of news coverage you probably won't find anywhere else on the internet, notwithstanding the current, healthy, burgeoning expansion of the Blogosphere.
Curt's pages are no place for the feint-hearted. He has repeatedly proved, in his former incarnations as the Politically-Correct Apostate (I & II) and through his current eponymous platform, that he is a person of indefatigable determination. Twice banned by Google for his disarmingly frank outspokenness on racial issues, he has been subdued not one iota by the dirty tricks of the corporate communists who want him silenced. He is an unapologetic stentorian truth-teller to the Nth degree. Nothing and no one will shut him up while there remains injustice in the world.
Curt's blog is one of THE most controversial on the internet. He is not a man to mince his words for fear of offending others. He treats his audience with all the sensitivity of a drill sargent with a bull-horn. There are no shades of gray in Curt's world. When something riles him he puts all his considerable energy into writing about it in the most forthright terms imaginable. No punches are pulled; no stance is too extreme. Curt's attitude is one of "if you find my style offensive, FUCK THE HELL OFF."
Once you get over the initial shock of Curt's rather 'uninhibited phraseology' however, the benefits of making his blog a regular read quickly become apparent. In Amerika today, there are crimes of unspeakable brutality being perpetrated by blacks against whites on a constant basis, yet the proportion of these outrages which ever see coverage in the mainstream news is tiny. The most gory, vicious and bestial attacks that prove the Negro race remains trapped in its savage heritage are stories that the Jewish-controlled mainstream media quietly sideline. We seldom get to hear about them and even when we do, somewhere along the line in their accounts, a white person will ultimately be in some way culpable.
The fact is that racially-motivated attacks by blacks FAR outnumber similarly-motivated attacks by whites on blacks. 50 years ago, perhaps it was different, but as everyone with a pair of eyes and a brain in their heads knows, the Amerika of today is an altogether different place from the America of half-a-century ago. Since Jewish agitators seized the initiative from decent folks back in the late 1950s and began to turn this once great country into the cultural cesspit we're obliged to suffer today, our lives have become increasingly blighted by fears of rape, murder, torture and robbery that to an overwhelming extent are carried out by out-of-control Negroes against innocent, trusting whites.
Curt, like the rest of us, is justifiably angered by this new reality, and doubly enraged about the way the jewsmedia absolutely REFUSES to acknowledge the horrific extent of the nightmare THEY have purposely created through their unremitting promotion of black-over-white culture, political-correctness, multiculturalism, massive illegal immigration and movies which glamorize murder, gangsterism, drug-taking, and virus-ridden, filthy, inter-racial sex. The Jew and the Negro have a LOT to answer for, reasons Curt - quite correctly - and if nobody else is going to take them to task over it, our Curt certainly will (just try stopping him!!)
Other blogs pussyfoot around difficult issues, but here's one that doesn't. Curt himself describes it as "in your face Truth" - which it is. It is also more than the plain unvarnished Truth that we get from half the bloggers out there. It's probably more accurate to describe Curt's work as the "plain unvarnished Truth - WITH THE VARNISH SHOT-BLASTED OFF."
Curt, for being a TRUE patriot who never minces his words or shifts his position one IOTA to accommodate anyone's phony sensitivities, Phaedrus salutes you!
That URL to remember (mark it well, friends) is...
www.curtmaynardsblog.blogspot.com
"You can take the Negro out of the jungle, but you can't take the jungle out of the Negro." - Anon.
If you look to the 'related sites of interest' section (below left) on this page, you will find an active link to a great patriot's latest blog. It's WELL worth taking a look at this unique resource (Phaedrus and friends strive to do so as often as humanly possible) owing to the kind of news coverage you probably won't find anywhere else on the internet, notwithstanding the current, healthy, burgeoning expansion of the Blogosphere.
Curt's pages are no place for the feint-hearted. He has repeatedly proved, in his former incarnations as the Politically-Correct Apostate (I & II) and through his current eponymous platform, that he is a person of indefatigable determination. Twice banned by Google for his disarmingly frank outspokenness on racial issues, he has been subdued not one iota by the dirty tricks of the corporate communists who want him silenced. He is an unapologetic stentorian truth-teller to the Nth degree. Nothing and no one will shut him up while there remains injustice in the world.
Curt's blog is one of THE most controversial on the internet. He is not a man to mince his words for fear of offending others. He treats his audience with all the sensitivity of a drill sargent with a bull-horn. There are no shades of gray in Curt's world. When something riles him he puts all his considerable energy into writing about it in the most forthright terms imaginable. No punches are pulled; no stance is too extreme. Curt's attitude is one of "if you find my style offensive, FUCK THE HELL OFF."
Once you get over the initial shock of Curt's rather 'uninhibited phraseology' however, the benefits of making his blog a regular read quickly become apparent. In Amerika today, there are crimes of unspeakable brutality being perpetrated by blacks against whites on a constant basis, yet the proportion of these outrages which ever see coverage in the mainstream news is tiny. The most gory, vicious and bestial attacks that prove the Negro race remains trapped in its savage heritage are stories that the Jewish-controlled mainstream media quietly sideline. We seldom get to hear about them and even when we do, somewhere along the line in their accounts, a white person will ultimately be in some way culpable.
The fact is that racially-motivated attacks by blacks FAR outnumber similarly-motivated attacks by whites on blacks. 50 years ago, perhaps it was different, but as everyone with a pair of eyes and a brain in their heads knows, the Amerika of today is an altogether different place from the America of half-a-century ago. Since Jewish agitators seized the initiative from decent folks back in the late 1950s and began to turn this once great country into the cultural cesspit we're obliged to suffer today, our lives have become increasingly blighted by fears of rape, murder, torture and robbery that to an overwhelming extent are carried out by out-of-control Negroes against innocent, trusting whites.
Curt, like the rest of us, is justifiably angered by this new reality, and doubly enraged about the way the jewsmedia absolutely REFUSES to acknowledge the horrific extent of the nightmare THEY have purposely created through their unremitting promotion of black-over-white culture, political-correctness, multiculturalism, massive illegal immigration and movies which glamorize murder, gangsterism, drug-taking, and virus-ridden, filthy, inter-racial sex. The Jew and the Negro have a LOT to answer for, reasons Curt - quite correctly - and if nobody else is going to take them to task over it, our Curt certainly will (just try stopping him!!)
Other blogs pussyfoot around difficult issues, but here's one that doesn't. Curt himself describes it as "in your face Truth" - which it is. It is also more than the plain unvarnished Truth that we get from half the bloggers out there. It's probably more accurate to describe Curt's work as the "plain unvarnished Truth - WITH THE VARNISH SHOT-BLASTED OFF."
Curt, for being a TRUE patriot who never minces his words or shifts his position one IOTA to accommodate anyone's phony sensitivities, Phaedrus salutes you!
That URL to remember (mark it well, friends) is...
www.curtmaynardsblog.blogspot.com
"You can take the Negro out of the jungle, but you can't take the jungle out of the Negro." - Anon.
Friday, June 13, 2008
For a better world: reject ALL Jewish influences!
.
Whilst we bide away our few remaining years under the suffocating yoke of world Jewry, and until the blight of this eternal pestilence is finally lifted from our lives, there are still some very worthwhile steps we can take to ensure that the parasite's swan song is made as difficult as possible for it. How to best do this? Simply by roundly and flatly denouncing every poisonous influence this most virulent of pests promotes.
First we need to formulate a list of what the Jews tell us we should be embracing.
Here's one. It's not exhaustive, but for the purposes of illustration, it will suffice:
1. Multiculturalism (forcing disparate races to live alongside one other in conflict)
2. Homosexuality, bestiality and pedophilia (raping our children via the TV)
3. Internationalism (the notion that borders are "just lines on a map")
4. Free Trade (no protection for our own workers and manufacturers)
5 Globalization (compete with a peasant in China earning a bowl of rice a day!)
6. Racial-interbreeding (creating the next generation of fatherless criminals)
7. Unacceptable stereotyping (blacks are stupid/Jews are devious and greedy)
8. The rejection of Christianity (marginalization & eradication of our principal faith)
9. Celebrity hero-worship (become rich and famous by being utterly talentless)
10. Insatiable Consumerism (splash-out on credit like there's no tomorrow)
11. Israel is an important ally (an "Ally" like Israel is ALL the enemies we need)
12. Terrorists are almost always Muslims ("Jews don't commit atrocities")
13. Iran is a danger to world peace (Iran is only a 'danger' to Israel so who cares?)
14. The pursuit of business and the creation of wealth is the highest ideal
15. Contempt for fine/classical art (admire this aborted fetus instead!)
16. The debasement of the language (import monosyllabic grunts from the Negro)
There's a HECK of a lot of cultural damage in the above list, wouldn't you say? Yet this is precisely the diet of garbage that the Jew is feeding us and our children through his 96% ownership/control of the mainstream media. How can that be right? Who has permitted this situation to go on so long? After all, the Jews constitute less than 3% of America's population, so they must have many good friends in high places among the corruptible section of the gentile population.
If you are sick and tired of having your children raped, assaulted and affronted by what they are subjected to in the movies, the TV, teen magazines and the gutter press, don't remain silent about it! Speak out! Don't be cowed by political correctness (it's a Marxist concept and if you're not a Marxist you shouldn't espouse it or condone it, anyway). Get the message out there! Shout it from the rooftops! Evangelize!!
Whilst we bide away our few remaining years under the suffocating yoke of world Jewry, and until the blight of this eternal pestilence is finally lifted from our lives, there are still some very worthwhile steps we can take to ensure that the parasite's swan song is made as difficult as possible for it. How to best do this? Simply by roundly and flatly denouncing every poisonous influence this most virulent of pests promotes.
First we need to formulate a list of what the Jews tell us we should be embracing.
Here's one. It's not exhaustive, but for the purposes of illustration, it will suffice:
1. Multiculturalism (forcing disparate races to live alongside one other in conflict)
2. Homosexuality, bestiality and pedophilia (raping our children via the TV)
3. Internationalism (the notion that borders are "just lines on a map")
4. Free Trade (no protection for our own workers and manufacturers)
5 Globalization (compete with a peasant in China earning a bowl of rice a day!)
6. Racial-interbreeding (creating the next generation of fatherless criminals)
7. Unacceptable stereotyping (blacks are stupid/Jews are devious and greedy)
8. The rejection of Christianity (marginalization & eradication of our principal faith)
9. Celebrity hero-worship (become rich and famous by being utterly talentless)
10. Insatiable Consumerism (splash-out on credit like there's no tomorrow)
11. Israel is an important ally (an "Ally" like Israel is ALL the enemies we need)
12. Terrorists are almost always Muslims ("Jews don't commit atrocities")
13. Iran is a danger to world peace (Iran is only a 'danger' to Israel so who cares?)
14. The pursuit of business and the creation of wealth is the highest ideal
15. Contempt for fine/classical art (admire this aborted fetus instead!)
16. The debasement of the language (import monosyllabic grunts from the Negro)
There's a HECK of a lot of cultural damage in the above list, wouldn't you say? Yet this is precisely the diet of garbage that the Jew is feeding us and our children through his 96% ownership/control of the mainstream media. How can that be right? Who has permitted this situation to go on so long? After all, the Jews constitute less than 3% of America's population, so they must have many good friends in high places among the corruptible section of the gentile population.
If you are sick and tired of having your children raped, assaulted and affronted by what they are subjected to in the movies, the TV, teen magazines and the gutter press, don't remain silent about it! Speak out! Don't be cowed by political correctness (it's a Marxist concept and if you're not a Marxist you shouldn't espouse it or condone it, anyway). Get the message out there! Shout it from the rooftops! Evangelize!!
Friday, May 2, 2008
An Exemplary Life?
The 'Power Elite' as Huxley called them, like their subjects to conform to a certain personality type. It makes taking over the world a very much easier task. Untold years of indoctrination via every conceivable medium (with the sole exception of the Internet) help facilitate great results in this long-term social engineering project to usher in a united world government with uniformly brown semi-moron citizens to do all the work. In the following not-so-fictional account of the life of the 'average joe' Phaedrus imagines how any one of us could unwittingly enable this nightmare vision to become a reality, due to a combination of apathy, misplaced trust in our leaders, and an unwillingness to rock the boat...
Conventional, respectable mid-western couple, Joe and Patsy married in 1971 following a four year courtship. The couple ventured out on the road of conventional married life in the typical American way. They were keen to get ahead; not obscenely ambitious you understand, but just naturally seeking to thrive and prosper in that optimistic, forward-looking innocent way of those distant days. Just about everything they owned was bought no money down with payments over 3 years. Falling for every garbage advert on TV., they accumulated a stack of useless crap, but it felt pretty good at the time and everyone else they knew was doing the same thing so there was a pressure to conform. Additionally, Joe had a well-paid, steady job at the car plant and Patsy taught math and English at the local elementary school. Things were as rosy as they can be for any young couple starting out.
In fact, life was pretty sweet for several years. They planned not to have any kids right away, but rather prudently to wait until such time as they were financially secure enough - like any responsible parents in those days. Nevertheless, after some 11 years of general contentment, Patsy began to feel that having kids couldn't be put off any longer and the time was now right to start that well-planned family.
Like the responsible couple that they were, Joe and Patsy had therefore deferred having children until they were good and ready for such a heavy responsibility. Conception was a good while coming though for Patsy, for reasons the doctors couldn't quite figure out. Tests didn't show up any abnormalities in either of them. Eventually, however, after much delay, further tests, and fertility treatment, they became proud parents of a wonderful daughter, Lucy. Raising a child is never easy, but Joe and Patsy gave it their best shot. Unfortunately, owing to the pressures of work, quality parenting time was in short supply and though they loved their daughter dearly, the time they spent with her was a great deal less than they would have liked. Lucy was less extrovert than most girls her age and craved her parents' attention, which owing to their lack of time she never got enough of. She spent unhealthily long hours growing up watching TV. Mom and dad weren't happy about that, but they were well into the rat-race by this time and simply consoled themselves with the thought that at least with the television for company, Lucy had something absorbing to keep her occupied.
Sometime in the late 1980s, there was a massive political debate about protectionism versus globalization. Some cool-looking guy in a pinstripe suit was arguing vigorously for free trade and said it would bring greater prosperity and better paid, more secure jobs to America. His opponent, rather older and not quite as snappily-dressed, asserted that it would do nothing of the sort and would in fact, only benefit the interests of big business and the super-rich. He went on to say that the American worker deserved protection from some of the working practices in the far east and elsewhere in order to defend his standard of living at home. The pinstripe retorted that God help us all when the American worker needs protection from foreigners. The American worker, he continued, was the best in the world. What could he possibly have to fear from his foreign counterpart? The tone of this rebuke had something mocking about it which rattled Joe. It somehow sounded as if the older man believed the American worker couldn't take on foreign competition and hope to win; almost like it was some kind of physical challenge that he and his colleagues weren't up to. "Bring it on!!" he snapped angrily, "Shove your protectionism! The American worker don't need it. We'll whip their asses!"
It was only many years later after most of the big plants had closed down that Joe realized the pinstripe's argument had been somewhat misleading. Rather than squaring up for a fist-fight with some coolie in a rice paddy, he'd actually been pitted against said coolie's own pay rates and working conditions. The coolie in the far east was quite prepared to work surrounded in squalor, ingesting cadmium and other toxic heavy metals, for little more than 40 cents a day, whereas Joe's union's workplace agreements set quite a high standard in all respects for its workers; hence the company couldn't survive in the international marketplace. It shrank over the years to a fraction of its former size and was eventually shut-down altogether. It was only then that the reality of those attractive-sounding buzzwords, "free trade! modernization! and globalization!" finally sank in. But by then the damage had been done. Poor old Joe!
Meanwhile there was the constant burble of the radio and TV as a sort of soundtrack/backdrop to the years. It's odd how the US always seems to be fighting a war abroad someplace or another. Sometimes it seems as if these conflicts never end. Our troops pull out of country x, declaring victory - when no sooner has the dust settled than they're invading country y! It reminded Joe dimly of some sci-fi movie he'd once seen set in 1984. The world is dangerous place, Joe concludes. Thank God America has a history of strong leaders that don't take any crap from foreign aggressors or we'd all have been in big trouble long ago!
More years pass and his darling daughter, Lucy has some great news to impart: she's getting married! She's found this really great guy called Michael and they were head-over-heals in love! One evening shortly afterwards, Lucy brings Michael home to meet her mom and pop. Joe is mortified! Lucy has been dating a Negro, and it further transpires, is already pregnant by him! He's too shocked to connect the fact that his laziness in letting the TV raise his daughter could come back and bite him in the ass like this in later life. However, by this time he's so wary of being branded a 'racist' that he bites his lip and says nothing. Somehow he manages to force a smile and acts like he's delighted, even though he instinctively knows his genome - everything that's made him and his kin what they are up until this point, is about to go down the toilet for keeps.
As soon as his daughter has the baby, her black partner, Michael, starts acting kind of strange. He disappears for weeks on end; never at any time contributing towards the child's upkeep or getting in touch with its mother, but only rarely via the phone to accuse her of seeing other men behind his back. Meanwhile the child is also behaving strangely. Lucy had noticed for some time that it was almost impossible to engage in steady eye-contact with the infant, and it also had an unhealthy obsession with playing with its own excrement; daubing it on walls and flicking it over the furniture. After a handful of visits to various health care professionals and at the age of two-and-a-half, the child was diagnosed with autism. The senior consultant in paediatrics confided guardedly in Joe, "I'm not supposed to say this and please don't repeat it, but we often find this disorder arising more frequently in children of mixed-race parents."
Joe gloomily drives Lucy back from the surgery. He resigns himself to the deficits of modern family life. After all, practically every family he knows seems to be in one mess or another these days. What can you do? The pamphlets the consultant had handed them as they left had some useful tips on how to deal with children with autism, but they also stated such kids cost about $650 a month more than the average healthy child to raise. And the prospects of getting so much as a nickel out of the father weren't great. Moreover, Lucy's chances of a second shot at happiness with a new guy - at least one with prospects - were now that much more remote, given that she had a mixed-race child with 'special needs' in tow. It was going to be tough going for them all.
Every once in a while Joe gets to hear some half-assed conspiracy theory from some guy in a bar. On this occasion, some wacko with unkempt hair and thick spectacles is explaining how in reality it was the US government that destroyed the World Trade Center in 2001; how Uncle Sam is the American people's greatest enemy by far, and all this talk of "terrorism" is just a smokescreen to account for endless wars abroad and increasing police powers against US citizens at home. This guy's views get a mixed reception among the patrons. Two other customers appeared to be hanging on his every word, one other was seemingly indifferent, but Joe and his usual drinking buddy, Ed had no time for such crap. If there were any mileage in such an outrageous story, then it would have been all over the mainstream media long ago. No journalist worth a dime would ever let a sensational scoop of the century like that pass him by, so self-evidently the claim has to be complete rubbish. Joe rolls his eyes to Ed, knocks back his beer and shuffles outside shaking his head in disbelief at the gullibility of some folks.
The late summer afternoon air is oppressive. Joe hears a drowsy, soporific drone from above: there are planes criss-crossing the sky leaving wispy, white trails in their wakes. The patterns are quite pretty and diffuse and disperse almost artistically. Before making the final left turn towards his home, Joe buys an evening paper from a street vendor. Buried somewhere on page 72, opposite the sports section, he finds a curious article about strange chemicals turning up in the food chain and falling fertility rates among white males over the last 30 years. "Is there a connection?" the paper asks, but draws no firm conclusions. He turns instead to the major league baseball results and subsequently cans the paper in disgust when he discovers how badly his favorite team faired last time out. He's tired and grumpy as usual, he eats his evening meal alone in front of the TV then goes straight to his computer to check for mail with barely a grunt to the nowadays largely ignored Patsy.
One day a short time later, he arrives home, bitching as usual about the cost of everything going up and how tough it is to get by these days, when right out of the blue, his world is blown apart by some earth-shattering news his wife has to tell him. Lucy's estranged partner, Michael, has been shot dead by the police. His jealousy had gotten to him once too often one sultry afternoon. Crazed by a combination of drink and drugs he'd stabbed her 27 times in a fit of violent rage in the belief that she'd been having sex with other men. None of this was true, but he'd turned to the crack-pipe of late and had become increasingly paranoid and delusional. This final episode culminating in the death of Joe's daughter had simply been "a disaster waiting to happen" - as the local law enforcement officers had put it. When Michael suddenly pulled a gun on these cops, as they approached to question him over a report of some screams heard coming from nearby, they had no option but to return fire and had killed him outright.
More years pass. For something approaching 35 years now, Joe had been contributing to a pension scheme, but the first such scheme went belly-up in some huge financial scandal that was never resolved, so now he's only got 12 years' worth of contributions under his belt with a new investment outfit. Unbeknown to Joe, however, he won't be calling on it, for he has no retirement to enjoy. Very many years of exposure to various environmental toxins and the stress of his insecure lifestyle have finally taken their toll on poor Joe. Compounded by the pressure of having not had a secure job for 17 years, eating too much junk food on the move and the stress of always being just one deal away from the trailer park eventually killed him. He developed severe chest pains and his doctor told him he needed a triple bypass urgently. Unfortunately, the cost of the surgery would have ruined the family and left them outdoors, so instead he simply adopted a low-fat diet and exercised more. Yeah, that oughta do it: who needs surgery? The people that founded America never had recourse to it!
Joe's wife Patsy was devastated by the loss of her hard-working husband just 9 months later, but at least she had the consolation that his long-standing financial prudence would provide her with some much needed security in the old age she now faced alone with her autistic grandchild. But some small print in the pension agreement threw the whole thing into doubt. She could take SOME benefits under Joe's contract, but it would be little more than a token sum of less than 10% of his rightful entitlement, had he lived. Furthermore, the capital sum would never pass to her, owing to some other complexly-worded provision annexed to the end of the agreement in a separate schedule. The salesman who sold them the plan made it all seem so simple at the time! Pity they'd been foolish enough to have trusted him and not kept an independent record of what he'd told them.
With the conviction that right was right, and truth always prevails in the end, she engaged a New York law firm, Shyster, Shafter & Shylock, to fight her quarter for her. They sounded very hopeful of a successful outcome and issued proceedings immediately against Joe's former insurance company. Patsy confidently left them to pursue the matter; she had a lot of other pressing stuff to get on with herself.
5 months rolled by and she was shocked to learn, from an interim account sent her, that the lawyers' fees had already gobbled up half of her expected winnings IF she were to win the case. The situation had already become untenable. She had no option but to instruct them to drop the proceedings. It was simply beyond her means to fight on and get a pay-out. She had no choice but to cut her loses and run. She settled-up with the lawyers to the tune of $45,000 which she had to borrow from her sister and put the whole rotten episode down to experience.
So what did our ideal citizen, Joe, have show for his life? A HUGE stack of paid and unpaid bills, bank and credit card statements, and a disabled, mixed-race grandchild. Great legacy, huh, Joe? But the fact is he didn't die entirely in vain. Even though he himself and his family had nothing to show for his entirely unremarkable existence, he nonetheless DID significantly contribute to others' needs somewhere along the line. For example, his tax-dollars helped fund several wars. They also paid the salaries of the politicians that oh-so-carefully looked after him and his family's interests whilst he was alive. Much of the money also went to the US's special ally, Israel - a strategic friend of the West that had to be kept afloat at all costs lest we all be murdered in our beds by terrorists.
So Joe's life had a purpose after all. He worked hard, never thought too deeply about anything, always trusted the government and respected the President. Sure he bitched about all the taxes he paid and how his and everyone else's standard of living had gone down the can over the decades, but he never kicked up a fuss over it. He just resigned himself to the idea that he was powerless and that no matter how crazy and suicidal some government policies - of both parties - might have appeared, at least they were only doing their best for America and only meant well at heart. When things HAD gone wrong, as they so frequently did - it was nothing sinister, no secret agenda, but rather just plain old incompetence - which politicians of all colors seemed cursed by. Joe's was in short, a life of blissful ignorance and intellectual poverty. His genome consequently got what it had coming all along: oblivion.
Conventional, respectable mid-western couple, Joe and Patsy married in 1971 following a four year courtship. The couple ventured out on the road of conventional married life in the typical American way. They were keen to get ahead; not obscenely ambitious you understand, but just naturally seeking to thrive and prosper in that optimistic, forward-looking innocent way of those distant days. Just about everything they owned was bought no money down with payments over 3 years. Falling for every garbage advert on TV., they accumulated a stack of useless crap, but it felt pretty good at the time and everyone else they knew was doing the same thing so there was a pressure to conform. Additionally, Joe had a well-paid, steady job at the car plant and Patsy taught math and English at the local elementary school. Things were as rosy as they can be for any young couple starting out.
In fact, life was pretty sweet for several years. They planned not to have any kids right away, but rather prudently to wait until such time as they were financially secure enough - like any responsible parents in those days. Nevertheless, after some 11 years of general contentment, Patsy began to feel that having kids couldn't be put off any longer and the time was now right to start that well-planned family.
Like the responsible couple that they were, Joe and Patsy had therefore deferred having children until they were good and ready for such a heavy responsibility. Conception was a good while coming though for Patsy, for reasons the doctors couldn't quite figure out. Tests didn't show up any abnormalities in either of them. Eventually, however, after much delay, further tests, and fertility treatment, they became proud parents of a wonderful daughter, Lucy. Raising a child is never easy, but Joe and Patsy gave it their best shot. Unfortunately, owing to the pressures of work, quality parenting time was in short supply and though they loved their daughter dearly, the time they spent with her was a great deal less than they would have liked. Lucy was less extrovert than most girls her age and craved her parents' attention, which owing to their lack of time she never got enough of. She spent unhealthily long hours growing up watching TV. Mom and dad weren't happy about that, but they were well into the rat-race by this time and simply consoled themselves with the thought that at least with the television for company, Lucy had something absorbing to keep her occupied.
Sometime in the late 1980s, there was a massive political debate about protectionism versus globalization. Some cool-looking guy in a pinstripe suit was arguing vigorously for free trade and said it would bring greater prosperity and better paid, more secure jobs to America. His opponent, rather older and not quite as snappily-dressed, asserted that it would do nothing of the sort and would in fact, only benefit the interests of big business and the super-rich. He went on to say that the American worker deserved protection from some of the working practices in the far east and elsewhere in order to defend his standard of living at home. The pinstripe retorted that God help us all when the American worker needs protection from foreigners. The American worker, he continued, was the best in the world. What could he possibly have to fear from his foreign counterpart? The tone of this rebuke had something mocking about it which rattled Joe. It somehow sounded as if the older man believed the American worker couldn't take on foreign competition and hope to win; almost like it was some kind of physical challenge that he and his colleagues weren't up to. "Bring it on!!" he snapped angrily, "Shove your protectionism! The American worker don't need it. We'll whip their asses!"
It was only many years later after most of the big plants had closed down that Joe realized the pinstripe's argument had been somewhat misleading. Rather than squaring up for a fist-fight with some coolie in a rice paddy, he'd actually been pitted against said coolie's own pay rates and working conditions. The coolie in the far east was quite prepared to work surrounded in squalor, ingesting cadmium and other toxic heavy metals, for little more than 40 cents a day, whereas Joe's union's workplace agreements set quite a high standard in all respects for its workers; hence the company couldn't survive in the international marketplace. It shrank over the years to a fraction of its former size and was eventually shut-down altogether. It was only then that the reality of those attractive-sounding buzzwords, "free trade! modernization! and globalization!" finally sank in. But by then the damage had been done. Poor old Joe!
Meanwhile there was the constant burble of the radio and TV as a sort of soundtrack/backdrop to the years. It's odd how the US always seems to be fighting a war abroad someplace or another. Sometimes it seems as if these conflicts never end. Our troops pull out of country x, declaring victory - when no sooner has the dust settled than they're invading country y! It reminded Joe dimly of some sci-fi movie he'd once seen set in 1984. The world is dangerous place, Joe concludes. Thank God America has a history of strong leaders that don't take any crap from foreign aggressors or we'd all have been in big trouble long ago!
More years pass and his darling daughter, Lucy has some great news to impart: she's getting married! She's found this really great guy called Michael and they were head-over-heals in love! One evening shortly afterwards, Lucy brings Michael home to meet her mom and pop. Joe is mortified! Lucy has been dating a Negro, and it further transpires, is already pregnant by him! He's too shocked to connect the fact that his laziness in letting the TV raise his daughter could come back and bite him in the ass like this in later life. However, by this time he's so wary of being branded a 'racist' that he bites his lip and says nothing. Somehow he manages to force a smile and acts like he's delighted, even though he instinctively knows his genome - everything that's made him and his kin what they are up until this point, is about to go down the toilet for keeps.
As soon as his daughter has the baby, her black partner, Michael, starts acting kind of strange. He disappears for weeks on end; never at any time contributing towards the child's upkeep or getting in touch with its mother, but only rarely via the phone to accuse her of seeing other men behind his back. Meanwhile the child is also behaving strangely. Lucy had noticed for some time that it was almost impossible to engage in steady eye-contact with the infant, and it also had an unhealthy obsession with playing with its own excrement; daubing it on walls and flicking it over the furniture. After a handful of visits to various health care professionals and at the age of two-and-a-half, the child was diagnosed with autism. The senior consultant in paediatrics confided guardedly in Joe, "I'm not supposed to say this and please don't repeat it, but we often find this disorder arising more frequently in children of mixed-race parents."
Joe gloomily drives Lucy back from the surgery. He resigns himself to the deficits of modern family life. After all, practically every family he knows seems to be in one mess or another these days. What can you do? The pamphlets the consultant had handed them as they left had some useful tips on how to deal with children with autism, but they also stated such kids cost about $650 a month more than the average healthy child to raise. And the prospects of getting so much as a nickel out of the father weren't great. Moreover, Lucy's chances of a second shot at happiness with a new guy - at least one with prospects - were now that much more remote, given that she had a mixed-race child with 'special needs' in tow. It was going to be tough going for them all.
Every once in a while Joe gets to hear some half-assed conspiracy theory from some guy in a bar. On this occasion, some wacko with unkempt hair and thick spectacles is explaining how in reality it was the US government that destroyed the World Trade Center in 2001; how Uncle Sam is the American people's greatest enemy by far, and all this talk of "terrorism" is just a smokescreen to account for endless wars abroad and increasing police powers against US citizens at home. This guy's views get a mixed reception among the patrons. Two other customers appeared to be hanging on his every word, one other was seemingly indifferent, but Joe and his usual drinking buddy, Ed had no time for such crap. If there were any mileage in such an outrageous story, then it would have been all over the mainstream media long ago. No journalist worth a dime would ever let a sensational scoop of the century like that pass him by, so self-evidently the claim has to be complete rubbish. Joe rolls his eyes to Ed, knocks back his beer and shuffles outside shaking his head in disbelief at the gullibility of some folks.
The late summer afternoon air is oppressive. Joe hears a drowsy, soporific drone from above: there are planes criss-crossing the sky leaving wispy, white trails in their wakes. The patterns are quite pretty and diffuse and disperse almost artistically. Before making the final left turn towards his home, Joe buys an evening paper from a street vendor. Buried somewhere on page 72, opposite the sports section, he finds a curious article about strange chemicals turning up in the food chain and falling fertility rates among white males over the last 30 years. "Is there a connection?" the paper asks, but draws no firm conclusions. He turns instead to the major league baseball results and subsequently cans the paper in disgust when he discovers how badly his favorite team faired last time out. He's tired and grumpy as usual, he eats his evening meal alone in front of the TV then goes straight to his computer to check for mail with barely a grunt to the nowadays largely ignored Patsy.
One day a short time later, he arrives home, bitching as usual about the cost of everything going up and how tough it is to get by these days, when right out of the blue, his world is blown apart by some earth-shattering news his wife has to tell him. Lucy's estranged partner, Michael, has been shot dead by the police. His jealousy had gotten to him once too often one sultry afternoon. Crazed by a combination of drink and drugs he'd stabbed her 27 times in a fit of violent rage in the belief that she'd been having sex with other men. None of this was true, but he'd turned to the crack-pipe of late and had become increasingly paranoid and delusional. This final episode culminating in the death of Joe's daughter had simply been "a disaster waiting to happen" - as the local law enforcement officers had put it. When Michael suddenly pulled a gun on these cops, as they approached to question him over a report of some screams heard coming from nearby, they had no option but to return fire and had killed him outright.
More years pass. For something approaching 35 years now, Joe had been contributing to a pension scheme, but the first such scheme went belly-up in some huge financial scandal that was never resolved, so now he's only got 12 years' worth of contributions under his belt with a new investment outfit. Unbeknown to Joe, however, he won't be calling on it, for he has no retirement to enjoy. Very many years of exposure to various environmental toxins and the stress of his insecure lifestyle have finally taken their toll on poor Joe. Compounded by the pressure of having not had a secure job for 17 years, eating too much junk food on the move and the stress of always being just one deal away from the trailer park eventually killed him. He developed severe chest pains and his doctor told him he needed a triple bypass urgently. Unfortunately, the cost of the surgery would have ruined the family and left them outdoors, so instead he simply adopted a low-fat diet and exercised more. Yeah, that oughta do it: who needs surgery? The people that founded America never had recourse to it!
Joe's wife Patsy was devastated by the loss of her hard-working husband just 9 months later, but at least she had the consolation that his long-standing financial prudence would provide her with some much needed security in the old age she now faced alone with her autistic grandchild. But some small print in the pension agreement threw the whole thing into doubt. She could take SOME benefits under Joe's contract, but it would be little more than a token sum of less than 10% of his rightful entitlement, had he lived. Furthermore, the capital sum would never pass to her, owing to some other complexly-worded provision annexed to the end of the agreement in a separate schedule. The salesman who sold them the plan made it all seem so simple at the time! Pity they'd been foolish enough to have trusted him and not kept an independent record of what he'd told them.
With the conviction that right was right, and truth always prevails in the end, she engaged a New York law firm, Shyster, Shafter & Shylock, to fight her quarter for her. They sounded very hopeful of a successful outcome and issued proceedings immediately against Joe's former insurance company. Patsy confidently left them to pursue the matter; she had a lot of other pressing stuff to get on with herself.
5 months rolled by and she was shocked to learn, from an interim account sent her, that the lawyers' fees had already gobbled up half of her expected winnings IF she were to win the case. The situation had already become untenable. She had no option but to instruct them to drop the proceedings. It was simply beyond her means to fight on and get a pay-out. She had no choice but to cut her loses and run. She settled-up with the lawyers to the tune of $45,000 which she had to borrow from her sister and put the whole rotten episode down to experience.
So what did our ideal citizen, Joe, have show for his life? A HUGE stack of paid and unpaid bills, bank and credit card statements, and a disabled, mixed-race grandchild. Great legacy, huh, Joe? But the fact is he didn't die entirely in vain. Even though he himself and his family had nothing to show for his entirely unremarkable existence, he nonetheless DID significantly contribute to others' needs somewhere along the line. For example, his tax-dollars helped fund several wars. They also paid the salaries of the politicians that oh-so-carefully looked after him and his family's interests whilst he was alive. Much of the money also went to the US's special ally, Israel - a strategic friend of the West that had to be kept afloat at all costs lest we all be murdered in our beds by terrorists.
So Joe's life had a purpose after all. He worked hard, never thought too deeply about anything, always trusted the government and respected the President. Sure he bitched about all the taxes he paid and how his and everyone else's standard of living had gone down the can over the decades, but he never kicked up a fuss over it. He just resigned himself to the idea that he was powerless and that no matter how crazy and suicidal some government policies - of both parties - might have appeared, at least they were only doing their best for America and only meant well at heart. When things HAD gone wrong, as they so frequently did - it was nothing sinister, no secret agenda, but rather just plain old incompetence - which politicians of all colors seemed cursed by. Joe's was in short, a life of blissful ignorance and intellectual poverty. His genome consequently got what it had coming all along: oblivion.
Friday, April 4, 2008
Democracy! democracy! democracy! – the call for as long as it suits THEM
It's been fashionable among some 'right wing' blogs to quote from and to post links to a UK newspaper called The Guardian. Presumably this is because said paper is extremely critical of the US administration and has a staff of very plausible journalists who have the knack of explaining complex issues in a comprehensible way which makes them accessible for the average reader to quickly grasp. But there's an ugly side to this seeming beacon of literary liberty, standing proudly as it does in an ocean of Jewish disinformation.
I invite the reader to cast their mind back a few years to the controversial Austrian election of their Freedom Party. After a hard-fought yet fair campaign, the candidate who prevailed, Jörg Haider, was denounced as a hard-line ultra-nationalist; a neo-Nazi no less, and his party as being of the "far right." There were strident and persistent calls for the election result to be declared null and void; for the result to be set aside! Which were among the loudest of these voices? The European Union for one, and The Guardian newspaper for another!
So much then for modern democracy. This unpleasant little episode in European politics reveals a great deal about the nature of today's precious democracy. Even in a civilized, modern, well-informed, mature democracy like Austria's, it's still possible for the electorate to make a 'mistake' and elect the 'wrong' party into power. The 'wrong party' in this case meaning one that's not in step with the inexorable march of the New World Order. And it would be the just the same in America, Britain, Canada and Germany too. Democracy must be defended at all costs - unless the people vote for the 'wrong' party, that is.
A similarly disturbing thing happened with the European Union Constitution. It's rather odd that such a document ever came to be put before the people of Europe in the first place, given that they were constantly reassured by proponents of further European integration that they were not being led down the path towards a Federal Europe! What's a 'European Constitution' if not a Federal document binding all EU countries to the same common principles?? Yet when a few countries rejected the idea, the document's name was simply changed to something less threatening. Europe's Power Elite assured member states leaders that the 'watered down' document no longer required a plebiscite.
There is the most enormous amount of double-dealing and treachery going on around us which must be rooted out, publicly-exposed and punished. Perhaps we can now see why Bush, Brown, Sarkozy, Merkel et al are so keen to push for greater democracy around the world: they have a somewhat different idea of what constitutes 'democracy' than the rest of us. Democracy for THEM is simply a means of having the people rubber stamp some legitimacy on their bullying, threatening, cheating and their endless, illegal foreign invasions. All these traitors who have done so much damage to our countries' reputations abroad need to be publicly tried and executed for High Treason - BEFORE THEY CAN DO ANY FURTHER DAMAGE.
I invite the reader to cast their mind back a few years to the controversial Austrian election of their Freedom Party. After a hard-fought yet fair campaign, the candidate who prevailed, Jörg Haider, was denounced as a hard-line ultra-nationalist; a neo-Nazi no less, and his party as being of the "far right." There were strident and persistent calls for the election result to be declared null and void; for the result to be set aside! Which were among the loudest of these voices? The European Union for one, and The Guardian newspaper for another!
So much then for modern democracy. This unpleasant little episode in European politics reveals a great deal about the nature of today's precious democracy. Even in a civilized, modern, well-informed, mature democracy like Austria's, it's still possible for the electorate to make a 'mistake' and elect the 'wrong' party into power. The 'wrong party' in this case meaning one that's not in step with the inexorable march of the New World Order. And it would be the just the same in America, Britain, Canada and Germany too. Democracy must be defended at all costs - unless the people vote for the 'wrong' party, that is.
A similarly disturbing thing happened with the European Union Constitution. It's rather odd that such a document ever came to be put before the people of Europe in the first place, given that they were constantly reassured by proponents of further European integration that they were not being led down the path towards a Federal Europe! What's a 'European Constitution' if not a Federal document binding all EU countries to the same common principles?? Yet when a few countries rejected the idea, the document's name was simply changed to something less threatening. Europe's Power Elite assured member states leaders that the 'watered down' document no longer required a plebiscite.
There is the most enormous amount of double-dealing and treachery going on around us which must be rooted out, publicly-exposed and punished. Perhaps we can now see why Bush, Brown, Sarkozy, Merkel et al are so keen to push for greater democracy around the world: they have a somewhat different idea of what constitutes 'democracy' than the rest of us. Democracy for THEM is simply a means of having the people rubber stamp some legitimacy on their bullying, threatening, cheating and their endless, illegal foreign invasions. All these traitors who have done so much damage to our countries' reputations abroad need to be publicly tried and executed for High Treason - BEFORE THEY CAN DO ANY FURTHER DAMAGE.
Thursday, March 20, 2008
Huxley Warned Us: Part 15
Brave New World Revisited, 1958:
"We see, then, that the disease of over-organization has been clearly recognized, that various comprehensive remedies have been prescribed and that experimental treatments of symptoms have been attempted here and there, often with considerable success. And yet, in spite of all this preaching and this exemplary practice, the disease grows steadily worse.
We know that it is unsafe to allow power to be concentrated in the hands of a ruling oligarchy; nevertheless power is in fact being concentrated in fewer and fewer hands. We know that, for most people, life in a huge modern city is anonymous, atomic, less than fully human; nevertheless the huge cities grow steadily huger and the pattern of urban-industrial living remains unchanged. We know that, in a very large complex society, democracy is almost meaningless except in relation to autonomous groups of manageable size; nevertheless more and more of every nation's affairs are managed by the bureaucrats of Big Government and Big Business. It is only too evident that, in practice, the problem of over-organization is almost as hard to solve as the problem of overpopulation. In both cases we know what ought to be done; but in neither case have we been able, as yet, to act effectively upon our knowledge."
This situation of over-organization to which Huxley constantly returns during the course of his work is no accident, but has in fact arisen by design. Organizational complexity is an absolute NECESSITY for the Jew to carry out his plans; his machinations would be readily exposed without it. One thing Jews hate above all else is EXPOSURE. Hitler put it almost poetically in Mein Kampf. The exact quote - though quite well known - eludes me at present, but suffice it to say that it perfectly describes how the Jews desire as many walls of opacity to work behind as they can possibly erect. So the more complex and confusing our world is, all the better for them to work their evil against us. This is one of the primary driving forces behind the advent of Big Government, which the Jews are always so keen to promote (at OUR expense of course).
Things have since unfortunately deteriorated beyond the point where the author's proposed solution would be of any help to us. It was a constructive suggestion 50 years ago perhaps, but is no longer applicable. We didn't take the necessary action when we should have. Our parents let us down just as we are now letting our own children down; consigning them to a life of slavery as a result of our indolence and apathy. For it is undeniably true that "an ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure" - it's less messy for one thing. We didn't make the effort in prevention, so our only remaining option now is to CURE and that will be a much uglier job.
I believe it's fitting at this point to conclude this section with an apposite quote from Winston Churchill:
"If you draft 10,000 regulations, you destroy all respect for the law."
Too many laws, too much complexity. What are we going to do about it?
"We see, then, that the disease of over-organization has been clearly recognized, that various comprehensive remedies have been prescribed and that experimental treatments of symptoms have been attempted here and there, often with considerable success. And yet, in spite of all this preaching and this exemplary practice, the disease grows steadily worse.
We know that it is unsafe to allow power to be concentrated in the hands of a ruling oligarchy; nevertheless power is in fact being concentrated in fewer and fewer hands. We know that, for most people, life in a huge modern city is anonymous, atomic, less than fully human; nevertheless the huge cities grow steadily huger and the pattern of urban-industrial living remains unchanged. We know that, in a very large complex society, democracy is almost meaningless except in relation to autonomous groups of manageable size; nevertheless more and more of every nation's affairs are managed by the bureaucrats of Big Government and Big Business. It is only too evident that, in practice, the problem of over-organization is almost as hard to solve as the problem of overpopulation. In both cases we know what ought to be done; but in neither case have we been able, as yet, to act effectively upon our knowledge."
This situation of over-organization to which Huxley constantly returns during the course of his work is no accident, but has in fact arisen by design. Organizational complexity is an absolute NECESSITY for the Jew to carry out his plans; his machinations would be readily exposed without it. One thing Jews hate above all else is EXPOSURE. Hitler put it almost poetically in Mein Kampf. The exact quote - though quite well known - eludes me at present, but suffice it to say that it perfectly describes how the Jews desire as many walls of opacity to work behind as they can possibly erect. So the more complex and confusing our world is, all the better for them to work their evil against us. This is one of the primary driving forces behind the advent of Big Government, which the Jews are always so keen to promote (at OUR expense of course).
Things have since unfortunately deteriorated beyond the point where the author's proposed solution would be of any help to us. It was a constructive suggestion 50 years ago perhaps, but is no longer applicable. We didn't take the necessary action when we should have. Our parents let us down just as we are now letting our own children down; consigning them to a life of slavery as a result of our indolence and apathy. For it is undeniably true that "an ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure" - it's less messy for one thing. We didn't make the effort in prevention, so our only remaining option now is to CURE and that will be a much uglier job.
I believe it's fitting at this point to conclude this section with an apposite quote from Winston Churchill:
"If you draft 10,000 regulations, you destroy all respect for the law."
Too many laws, too much complexity. What are we going to do about it?
Friday, March 7, 2008
Are the 'Special Prisons' Already Here?
.
It is a widely anticipated indicator of the final stages of the full implementation of the New World Order Agenda in America - that there will be an upsurge in prison-building. Those in the Power Elite know that many of us won't be going without a fight. It's simply BOUND to get ugly. Too many dissidents have been warning their fellow citizens of what Uncle Sam is really up to. Growing numbers of newly-awoken activists are in turn, spreading the word further and so the process goes on. The government cannot say with any certainty whatsoever how many of us who have awoken to the Agenda there are today and how many of us there will be tomorrow. That there will be more, many more, as time goes on is inevitable - all other things being equal.
But these numbers are inestimable. Counting the number of anti-NWO web sites there are won‘t help. Counting the number of follow-ups people leave on anti-NWO blogs and discussion forums won‘t help, either. For very understandable reasons, the vast majority of readers of these sites are simply lurkers in search of the truth. They are pretty much invisible, particularly if they read only in internet cafes and use onion routers/proxy servers and so forth. But they’re out there, across the world, and they’re REAL – and a serious potential threat to One World Government.
Let us put ourselves in the position of the enemy (our Big Brother government) for a moment. They need to build a large number of secure prisons for an unknown and growing number of political dissidents and they don't have much time left. NWO theorists tell us that these will most likely be tucked away, as one might expect, in remote areas of the country. However, in the age of the internet, the sudden building of large numbers of prisons which remain unused for many months would be regarded as suspicious enough to warrant comment by the sparse, rural, neighboring communities. It would be all over the Web in no time. So there has to be a way of rolling out the prison building program which doesn't arouse suspicion.
Perhaps an answer lies in the increased use of jail sentences for the pettiest of offenders. It could easily be sold to the public as the government being 'tough on crime' – simply adopting an extension of the 'zero tolerance' and 'three-strikes' initiatives. Jailing people for pissing on the sidewalk, stealing a slice of pizza, jaywalking or whatever would swell the seemingly legitimate demand for prison places like nothing else. More and more jails would be packed out with more and more 'criminals' and the government would get a great big pat on the back for not being soft on crime. But I guess you can see where this is heading already, can't you?
Following the eagerly-awaited 'precipitating event' the president would immediately avail himself of the full provisions of the Patriot Act(s). Depending on the mood of the nation and how many people have woken up by that time, the result of the sudden implementation of these draconian powers would lead to some level of what can only be described as civil war. People who refuse to give up their guns and submit to Fed tyranny, survivalists who dress up in fatigues and hide out in the woods, members of the Militias and others who're simply too smart for their own good would quickly be 'taken out' if at all possible. This might enrage the sleepwalkers who then finally realized what the game is and they then suddenly become enemies of the state as well. Huge numbers of people are instantly criminalized and who must be imprisoned under the new 'state of emergency.'
You can guess what happens next. To make room for all these new 'criminals' the jails will be emptied of all petty offenders; they'll get paroled and think themselves most fortunate, no doubt - and they’ll probably remain ignorant of the crucial role they played in facilitating this major plank in the NWO's conquest of America. Given that time is not on the government's side for a number of reasons, I suspect 2008 will be a year of tribulation for us. All the signs point to it. Now, has anyone noticed anything out of the ordinary in prison-building, prison numbers or composition of inmates over recent years? Have a think about it....
It is a widely anticipated indicator of the final stages of the full implementation of the New World Order Agenda in America - that there will be an upsurge in prison-building. Those in the Power Elite know that many of us won't be going without a fight. It's simply BOUND to get ugly. Too many dissidents have been warning their fellow citizens of what Uncle Sam is really up to. Growing numbers of newly-awoken activists are in turn, spreading the word further and so the process goes on. The government cannot say with any certainty whatsoever how many of us who have awoken to the Agenda there are today and how many of us there will be tomorrow. That there will be more, many more, as time goes on is inevitable - all other things being equal.
But these numbers are inestimable. Counting the number of anti-NWO web sites there are won‘t help. Counting the number of follow-ups people leave on anti-NWO blogs and discussion forums won‘t help, either. For very understandable reasons, the vast majority of readers of these sites are simply lurkers in search of the truth. They are pretty much invisible, particularly if they read only in internet cafes and use onion routers/proxy servers and so forth. But they’re out there, across the world, and they’re REAL – and a serious potential threat to One World Government.
Let us put ourselves in the position of the enemy (our Big Brother government) for a moment. They need to build a large number of secure prisons for an unknown and growing number of political dissidents and they don't have much time left. NWO theorists tell us that these will most likely be tucked away, as one might expect, in remote areas of the country. However, in the age of the internet, the sudden building of large numbers of prisons which remain unused for many months would be regarded as suspicious enough to warrant comment by the sparse, rural, neighboring communities. It would be all over the Web in no time. So there has to be a way of rolling out the prison building program which doesn't arouse suspicion.
Perhaps an answer lies in the increased use of jail sentences for the pettiest of offenders. It could easily be sold to the public as the government being 'tough on crime' – simply adopting an extension of the 'zero tolerance' and 'three-strikes' initiatives. Jailing people for pissing on the sidewalk, stealing a slice of pizza, jaywalking or whatever would swell the seemingly legitimate demand for prison places like nothing else. More and more jails would be packed out with more and more 'criminals' and the government would get a great big pat on the back for not being soft on crime. But I guess you can see where this is heading already, can't you?
Following the eagerly-awaited 'precipitating event' the president would immediately avail himself of the full provisions of the Patriot Act(s). Depending on the mood of the nation and how many people have woken up by that time, the result of the sudden implementation of these draconian powers would lead to some level of what can only be described as civil war. People who refuse to give up their guns and submit to Fed tyranny, survivalists who dress up in fatigues and hide out in the woods, members of the Militias and others who're simply too smart for their own good would quickly be 'taken out' if at all possible. This might enrage the sleepwalkers who then finally realized what the game is and they then suddenly become enemies of the state as well. Huge numbers of people are instantly criminalized and who must be imprisoned under the new 'state of emergency.'
You can guess what happens next. To make room for all these new 'criminals' the jails will be emptied of all petty offenders; they'll get paroled and think themselves most fortunate, no doubt - and they’ll probably remain ignorant of the crucial role they played in facilitating this major plank in the NWO's conquest of America. Given that time is not on the government's side for a number of reasons, I suspect 2008 will be a year of tribulation for us. All the signs point to it. Now, has anyone noticed anything out of the ordinary in prison-building, prison numbers or composition of inmates over recent years? Have a think about it....
Friday, February 29, 2008
Huxley Warned Us: Part 10
In this extract, Huxley addresses one of the Biggest Lies of the 20th Century - that all men are created equal.
Aldous Huxley, 1958:
"...The orgy of spying, lynching and judicial murder, which these wrong views about magic made logical and mandatory, was not matched until our own days, when the Communist ethic, based upon erroneous views about race, commanded and justified atrocities on an even greater scale. Consequences hardly less undesirable are likely to follow the general adoption of a Social Ethic, based upon the erroneous view that ours is a fully social species, that human infants are born uniform and that individuals are the product of conditioning by and within the collective environment. If these views were correct, if human beings were in fact the members of a truly social species, and if their individual differences were trifling and could be completely ironed out by appropriate conditioning, then, obviously, there would be no need for liberty and the State would be justified in persecuting the heretics who demanded it..."
Here the esteemed writer and visionary takes a distinct swipe against the founders of the United Nations. We have only this (presumably censored) Jewish version of his words from Random House Publishing to go by, but nevertheless it clear that Huxley had no time at all for Communist dogma and rounded repudiated it. It is only sad that we cannot study his original manuscript, for it is highly likely that he would have spelled out in no uncertain terms the inferior forms of life to which he merely alludes here in this 'sanitized version' - for it was written many years prior to the advent of political-correctness and has presumably been 'cleaned up' to avoid offense.
Huxley vehemently eschews the doctrine that all men would be equal in later life if they were each given the same opportunities from birth. Naturally, he tacitly refers to the Negro races here, to whose shortcomings Communism was intentionally blind. The UN/NWO official line is that all extended genetic phenotypes are essentially identical in all but superficial appearance. But we all - those of us in the REAL world that is - know as well as Huxley that there is a striking correlation between IQ and race, with the southern African Bantu coming out bottom of the pile. No amount of preferential, special schooling or 'positive discrimination' can make a silk purse out of a pig's ear. It's an uncomfortable FACT for our white Liberal friends that whilst nurture IS important, NATURE predominates and cannot be denied. A southern African Bantu (or one of its descendants now in Europe or America) can no more become an accomplished scientist, artist or writer, than can a mongrel puppy born in a stable can grow up a racehorse.
If we wish to learn the intrinsic capabilities of ANY race, we need merely to examine their cultural heritage; there's no need to make up stupid lies to pretend things are otherwise. The Negro, like the Jew and the Gypsy, have NOTHING to show for their much-vaunted cultures. They are all incapable of surviving by themselves. The Negroes are simply useless AT BEST, the Gypsies are mostly harmless but can be a dang nuisance at times, and the Jew..... Well, for the Jew I think we need a rather more exhaustive and intensive examination than this study of Huxley's prophecies allows!
Aldous Huxley, 1958:
"...The orgy of spying, lynching and judicial murder, which these wrong views about magic made logical and mandatory, was not matched until our own days, when the Communist ethic, based upon erroneous views about race, commanded and justified atrocities on an even greater scale. Consequences hardly less undesirable are likely to follow the general adoption of a Social Ethic, based upon the erroneous view that ours is a fully social species, that human infants are born uniform and that individuals are the product of conditioning by and within the collective environment. If these views were correct, if human beings were in fact the members of a truly social species, and if their individual differences were trifling and could be completely ironed out by appropriate conditioning, then, obviously, there would be no need for liberty and the State would be justified in persecuting the heretics who demanded it..."
Here the esteemed writer and visionary takes a distinct swipe against the founders of the United Nations. We have only this (presumably censored) Jewish version of his words from Random House Publishing to go by, but nevertheless it clear that Huxley had no time at all for Communist dogma and rounded repudiated it. It is only sad that we cannot study his original manuscript, for it is highly likely that he would have spelled out in no uncertain terms the inferior forms of life to which he merely alludes here in this 'sanitized version' - for it was written many years prior to the advent of political-correctness and has presumably been 'cleaned up' to avoid offense.
Huxley vehemently eschews the doctrine that all men would be equal in later life if they were each given the same opportunities from birth. Naturally, he tacitly refers to the Negro races here, to whose shortcomings Communism was intentionally blind. The UN/NWO official line is that all extended genetic phenotypes are essentially identical in all but superficial appearance. But we all - those of us in the REAL world that is - know as well as Huxley that there is a striking correlation between IQ and race, with the southern African Bantu coming out bottom of the pile. No amount of preferential, special schooling or 'positive discrimination' can make a silk purse out of a pig's ear. It's an uncomfortable FACT for our white Liberal friends that whilst nurture IS important, NATURE predominates and cannot be denied. A southern African Bantu (or one of its descendants now in Europe or America) can no more become an accomplished scientist, artist or writer, than can a mongrel puppy born in a stable can grow up a racehorse.
If we wish to learn the intrinsic capabilities of ANY race, we need merely to examine their cultural heritage; there's no need to make up stupid lies to pretend things are otherwise. The Negro, like the Jew and the Gypsy, have NOTHING to show for their much-vaunted cultures. They are all incapable of surviving by themselves. The Negroes are simply useless AT BEST, the Gypsies are mostly harmless but can be a dang nuisance at times, and the Jew..... Well, for the Jew I think we need a rather more exhaustive and intensive examination than this study of Huxley's prophecies allows!
Huxley Warned Us: Part 9
Aldous Huxley, 50 years ago in Brave New World Revisited:
"...That a dictator could, if he so desired, make use of [certain psychotropic chemicals] for political purposes is obvious. He could ensure himself against political unrest by changing the chemistry of his subjects' brains and so making them content with their servile conditions. He could use tranquillizers to calm the excited, stimulants to arouse enthusiasm in the indifferent, hallucinants to distract the attention of the wretched from their miseries.
"But how, it may be asked, will the dictator get his subjects to take the pills that will make them think, feel and behave in the ways he finds desirable? In all probability it will be enough merely to make the pills available. Today alcohol and tobacco are available, and people spend considerably more on these very unsatisfactory euphorics, pseudostimulants and sedatives than they are ready to spend on the education of their children."
We now know from secret experimental data released by Russia following a series of experiments carried out in the 1960s that adding fluoride to water supplies in concentrations of as little as 1ppm induces in subjects enhanced levels of susceptibility and compliance - a very useful tool indeed for any wayward government. Our so-called 'leaders' are still toying with the idea of introducing it into our drinking water on the grounds of improving dental health, notwithstanding that its psychotropic effects are becoming increasingly known.
So the big question is: could the dental health motive have been a mere pretext all along? Given that the discussion over fluoride remains on-going long after its mind-altering properties have been publicized, it seems quite likely. If there is one thing Huxley told us that we must never forget it is that our real enemies in the West are our governments. They are infinitely more dangerous to us than all the world's disparate terrorist groupings put together. Do we really know what they're injecting our kids with? Could there be more to it than simple vaccination?
"...That a dictator could, if he so desired, make use of [certain psychotropic chemicals] for political purposes is obvious. He could ensure himself against political unrest by changing the chemistry of his subjects' brains and so making them content with their servile conditions. He could use tranquillizers to calm the excited, stimulants to arouse enthusiasm in the indifferent, hallucinants to distract the attention of the wretched from their miseries.
"But how, it may be asked, will the dictator get his subjects to take the pills that will make them think, feel and behave in the ways he finds desirable? In all probability it will be enough merely to make the pills available. Today alcohol and tobacco are available, and people spend considerably more on these very unsatisfactory euphorics, pseudostimulants and sedatives than they are ready to spend on the education of their children."
We now know from secret experimental data released by Russia following a series of experiments carried out in the 1960s that adding fluoride to water supplies in concentrations of as little as 1ppm induces in subjects enhanced levels of susceptibility and compliance - a very useful tool indeed for any wayward government. Our so-called 'leaders' are still toying with the idea of introducing it into our drinking water on the grounds of improving dental health, notwithstanding that its psychotropic effects are becoming increasingly known.
So the big question is: could the dental health motive have been a mere pretext all along? Given that the discussion over fluoride remains on-going long after its mind-altering properties have been publicized, it seems quite likely. If there is one thing Huxley told us that we must never forget it is that our real enemies in the West are our governments. They are infinitely more dangerous to us than all the world's disparate terrorist groupings put together. Do we really know what they're injecting our kids with? Could there be more to it than simple vaccination?
Huxley Warned Us: Part 8
In Part 7, we were able to see how blanket control over the media had enabled the Jews to become the only game in town when it came to dissemination of information and that the alphabet soup of TV channels on offer that suggest the availability of free choice is simply an illusion. Virtually ALL the networks are pushing forward the NWO agenda by promoting the idea that free-trade, globalization and mass movements of peoples between countries is a Good Thing which brings jobs and prosperity. And whilst we dive headlong into embracing this cultural suicide, the really big gainers, as always, are the Jews. By acting as intermediaries, agents and obstacles between parties in international trade (a core business of this parasite going back Millenia) they can ALWAYS make a good living, regardless of how impoverished those poor fools competing for ever worsening living standards consequently become.
Huxley, 1958:
"In the West, democratic principles are proclaimed and many able and conscientious publicists do their best to supply electors with adequate information and to persuade them, by rational argument, to make realistic choices in the light of that information. All this is greatly to the good. But unfortunately propaganda in the Western democracies above all in America, has two faces and a divided personality. In charge of the editorial department there is often a democratic Dr Jekyll - a propagandist who would be very happy to prove that John Dewey had been right about the ability of human nature to respond to truth and reason. But this worthy man controls only a part of the machinery of mass communication.
"In charge of advertising we find an anti-democrat because anti-rational, Mr Hyde - or rather a Doctor Hyde, for Hyde is now a Ph.D. in psychology and has a master's degree as well in the Social Sciences. This Dr Hyde would be very unhappy indeed if everybody always lived up to John Dewey's faith in human nature. Truth and reason are Jekyll's affairs, not his . Hyde is a Motivation Analyst, and his business is to study human weaknesses and failings, to investigate those unconscious desires and fears by which so much of men's conscious thinking and overt doing is determined. And he does this, not in the spirit of the moralist who would like to make people better, or of the physician who would like to improve health, but simply in order to find out the best way to take advantage of their ignorance and to exploit their irrationality for the pecuniary benefit of his employers."
Here again, Huxley re-affirms his conviction that the mass media is working AGAINST the best interests of the people. His 'Dr. Hyde' character is alive and with us in the West today, too. Yet since we are now 50 years down the road from when Huxley penned his observations, the new Dr. Hyde of today has infinitely more techniques for deception in his armory. Fifty years of endless studies into what makes people tick in the most microscopic areas of their lives has yielded hundreds of thousands of documents and reports detailing every gleanable fact from the human psyche and how it may be ruthlessly and cynically manipulated to ensure that the naked greed of the Jew is to some extent at least satiated. And all this goes on with the full backing of Western governments, the leaders of which have become phenomenally wealthy for their tacit assistance in selling out the true interests of the people. So much for 'democracy.' So much for 'public service.'
Huxley, 1958:
"In the West, democratic principles are proclaimed and many able and conscientious publicists do their best to supply electors with adequate information and to persuade them, by rational argument, to make realistic choices in the light of that information. All this is greatly to the good. But unfortunately propaganda in the Western democracies above all in America, has two faces and a divided personality. In charge of the editorial department there is often a democratic Dr Jekyll - a propagandist who would be very happy to prove that John Dewey had been right about the ability of human nature to respond to truth and reason. But this worthy man controls only a part of the machinery of mass communication.
"In charge of advertising we find an anti-democrat because anti-rational, Mr Hyde - or rather a Doctor Hyde, for Hyde is now a Ph.D. in psychology and has a master's degree as well in the Social Sciences. This Dr Hyde would be very unhappy indeed if everybody always lived up to John Dewey's faith in human nature. Truth and reason are Jekyll's affairs, not his . Hyde is a Motivation Analyst, and his business is to study human weaknesses and failings, to investigate those unconscious desires and fears by which so much of men's conscious thinking and overt doing is determined. And he does this, not in the spirit of the moralist who would like to make people better, or of the physician who would like to improve health, but simply in order to find out the best way to take advantage of their ignorance and to exploit their irrationality for the pecuniary benefit of his employers."
Here again, Huxley re-affirms his conviction that the mass media is working AGAINST the best interests of the people. His 'Dr. Hyde' character is alive and with us in the West today, too. Yet since we are now 50 years down the road from when Huxley penned his observations, the new Dr. Hyde of today has infinitely more techniques for deception in his armory. Fifty years of endless studies into what makes people tick in the most microscopic areas of their lives has yielded hundreds of thousands of documents and reports detailing every gleanable fact from the human psyche and how it may be ruthlessly and cynically manipulated to ensure that the naked greed of the Jew is to some extent at least satiated. And all this goes on with the full backing of Western governments, the leaders of which have become phenomenally wealthy for their tacit assistance in selling out the true interests of the people. So much for 'democracy.' So much for 'public service.'
Monday, February 18, 2008
Huxley Warned Us: Part 3
(see first introductory preamble from Part 1)
In this 3rd part of this series on the predictions of Aldous Huxley, the great visionary bemoans the fact that in our increasingly overpopulated world, the people who constitute the principal component of the problem by producing the most children who will themselves go on to reproduce prodigiously; propagate poor quality genetic material and turn out huge numbers of biologically-inferior offspring. One can safely infer here that Huxley is referring to the Negro races. When you read the text below it leaves little room for doubt, in fact.
Common sense observations like this could be made freely 50 years ago at the time Huxley was writing, but just imagine the difficulty a professional person would encounter in re-iterating these simple truths today. They'd be branded as a Nazi or a eugenicist and God only knows what else. The result has been that the issue of differential breeding rates between the races and the population explosion cannot even be discussed! A time-bomb is ticking away that could eventually destroy the planet, yet political-correctness dictates we must remain silent on this, one of the most pressing of current issues.
Huxley, 1958:
"In the second half of the twentieth century, we do nothing systematic about our breeding; but in our random and unregulated way, we are not only overpopulating the planet, we are also, it would seem, making sure that these greater numbers shall be of biologically poorer quality. In the bad old days children with considerable, or even slight, hereditary defects rarely survived. Today, thanks to sanitation, modern pharmacology and the social conscience, most of the children born with hereditary defects reach maturity and multiply their kind. Under the conditions now prevailing, every advance in medicine will tend to be offset by a corresponding advance in the survival rates of individuals cursed by some genetic insufficiency. In spite of new wonder drugs and better treatment (indeed, in a certain sense, precisely because of these things), the physical health of the general population will show no improvement, and may even deteriorate. And along with a decline in average healthiness there may well go a decline in average intelligence. Indeed, some competent authorities are convinced that such a decline has already taken place and is continuing. 'Under conditions that are both soft and unregulated,' writes Dr W.H. Sheldon, 'our best stock tends to be out-bred by stock that is inferior to it in every respect ... It is the fashion in some academic circles to assure students that the alarm over differential birth-rates is unfounded; that these problems are merely economic, or merely educational, or merely religious, or merely cultural or something of the sort. This is Pollyanna optimism. Reproductive delinquency is biological and basic.' And he adds that 'nobody knows just how far the average IQ in this country (the USA) has declined since 1916, when Terman attempted to standardize the meaning of IQ 100."
In Phaedrus' opinion, the scientists who sit down and systematically analyze the result of various studies and reach conclusions which they KNOW will not be well received, must proclaim them honestly and fearlessly nevertheless. Not to do so would be a crime against Truth and another victory for the shadowy plotters behind the New World Order, AKA Jewish global domination and our continued, collective enslavement.
In this 3rd part of this series on the predictions of Aldous Huxley, the great visionary bemoans the fact that in our increasingly overpopulated world, the people who constitute the principal component of the problem by producing the most children who will themselves go on to reproduce prodigiously; propagate poor quality genetic material and turn out huge numbers of biologically-inferior offspring. One can safely infer here that Huxley is referring to the Negro races. When you read the text below it leaves little room for doubt, in fact.
Common sense observations like this could be made freely 50 years ago at the time Huxley was writing, but just imagine the difficulty a professional person would encounter in re-iterating these simple truths today. They'd be branded as a Nazi or a eugenicist and God only knows what else. The result has been that the issue of differential breeding rates between the races and the population explosion cannot even be discussed! A time-bomb is ticking away that could eventually destroy the planet, yet political-correctness dictates we must remain silent on this, one of the most pressing of current issues.
Huxley, 1958:
"In the second half of the twentieth century, we do nothing systematic about our breeding; but in our random and unregulated way, we are not only overpopulating the planet, we are also, it would seem, making sure that these greater numbers shall be of biologically poorer quality. In the bad old days children with considerable, or even slight, hereditary defects rarely survived. Today, thanks to sanitation, modern pharmacology and the social conscience, most of the children born with hereditary defects reach maturity and multiply their kind. Under the conditions now prevailing, every advance in medicine will tend to be offset by a corresponding advance in the survival rates of individuals cursed by some genetic insufficiency. In spite of new wonder drugs and better treatment (indeed, in a certain sense, precisely because of these things), the physical health of the general population will show no improvement, and may even deteriorate. And along with a decline in average healthiness there may well go a decline in average intelligence. Indeed, some competent authorities are convinced that such a decline has already taken place and is continuing. 'Under conditions that are both soft and unregulated,' writes Dr W.H. Sheldon, 'our best stock tends to be out-bred by stock that is inferior to it in every respect ... It is the fashion in some academic circles to assure students that the alarm over differential birth-rates is unfounded; that these problems are merely economic, or merely educational, or merely religious, or merely cultural or something of the sort. This is Pollyanna optimism. Reproductive delinquency is biological and basic.' And he adds that 'nobody knows just how far the average IQ in this country (the USA) has declined since 1916, when Terman attempted to standardize the meaning of IQ 100."
In Phaedrus' opinion, the scientists who sit down and systematically analyze the result of various studies and reach conclusions which they KNOW will not be well received, must proclaim them honestly and fearlessly nevertheless. Not to do so would be a crime against Truth and another victory for the shadowy plotters behind the New World Order, AKA Jewish global domination and our continued, collective enslavement.
Tuesday, February 12, 2008
Russia in Grave Danger
She is being encircled by the dark forces of the New World Order. She faces the gravest threat to her existence since JFK's ultimatum of 1962. Back then, she was the aggressor; today she's the innocent victim of a vicious bully. She must and will defend herself. She has no other choice! For the out-of-control juggernaut that is the NWO to roll out its twisted agenda, refractory Russia must be crushed. In consequence of this perverse aim, we ALL - every one of us in the West - face the prospect of not waking up tomorrow. Both sides - thanks to Bush - now assert the doctrine of preemptive, unprovoked nuclear strikes. This is the blackest time in the whole of history for world peace.
Friday, February 8, 2008
Don't Leave the Country if Obama Becomes President!
.
There's really no need. If America does elect this Negro to the White House, things will still trundle on exactly as before. Obama will simply be another puppet of Israel, like Bush 2, Clinton, Bush 1 and the rest. So no real change and America will continue to go to the Devil. The guy in the Oval Office is really quite an irrelevance; kind of like the Queen of England - just a figurehead. In fact you could have Kermit the Frog or Miss Piggy as Chief and it wouldn't make a blind bit of difference to the direction this country's heading in. And it never will, until such time as the Jews (who REALLY call the shots) are removed lock, stock and barrel from ALL positions of public influence in this country - for ever.
There's really no need. If America does elect this Negro to the White House, things will still trundle on exactly as before. Obama will simply be another puppet of Israel, like Bush 2, Clinton, Bush 1 and the rest. So no real change and America will continue to go to the Devil. The guy in the Oval Office is really quite an irrelevance; kind of like the Queen of England - just a figurehead. In fact you could have Kermit the Frog or Miss Piggy as Chief and it wouldn't make a blind bit of difference to the direction this country's heading in. And it never will, until such time as the Jews (who REALLY call the shots) are removed lock, stock and barrel from ALL positions of public influence in this country - for ever.
Wednesday, February 6, 2008
What exactly is the "Judeo-Christian Tradition"?
.
It's a phrase that's frequently tossed around nowadays, you may have noticed it cropping up ubiquitously yourself! Certainly our bellicose presidential hopeful, John McCain has been keen to repeat it loudly wherever he goes, presumably to give a clear signal to the all-powerful Israel-First lobby that he's their guy and for him at least - the old war-horse that he claims to be - Zionism isn't a dirty word.
But seriously: is there any commonality to be found in the two faiths? In Phaedrus' considered submission, no, there is NONE. Granted, Christ was a Jew - a good man who unaccountably sprung from Jewish loins - something of a miracle in itself, you may think. He grew up to eschew everything Judaism stood for and provoked the anger of the Pharisees to such a degree that they engineered his long and excruciatingly painful death. And that was the end of this not-so-beautiful relationship.
So much then for common factors. Judaism and Christianity are poles apart; more different in every respect even than chalk and cheese. There is no such thing as the "Judeo-Christian Tradition" and anyone who uses this term ought to be regarded with the utmost suspicion, for they are either a willful ignoramus, someone sucking up to the Jews, or else a cunning Jew attempting to revise theology for Israel's benefit.
It's always been something of a mystery to me how come one almost invariably finds the New Testament 'bundled' with the Old. Printing two entirely different books within a single binder doesn't unify two different religions, I'm afraid, much though the Jews would like it to appear so. Christians should properly refuse to accept such editions, for the bulk of them are filled with Evil and ill-disguised Satanism. Only the stuff from AD.0 counts for anything.
The Gods are different, too. The God of the Old Testament - the Jewish God - is a different entity altogether from the God of the New Testament - the father of Jesus. And if you have two distinctly different deities, then there's no way anyone can successfully pass off the lie that the two faiths are in essence of one and the same root. For example, in one unguarded moment, Harold Rosenthal, aide to a fellow Ashkenazi Jew, Senator Jacob Javits, stated in 1976 that: “Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer.”
Of course it's in the Jews' best interests for them to deny this rather disturbing fact. The pretense of a Christian connection helps to make them feel less marginalized in the world for one thing, and no doubt American tax payers feel less irate at having to throw endless piles of their cash at Israel for another, if they can be convinced they're fulfilling a Bible prophesy. And again, we are constantly told that "Israel is our ally." Boy! Some ally! But the fact remains that Jews and Christians are entirely separate faiths and furthermore share neither bloodline nor racial nor ideological characteristics.
So the next time you hear someone use this term within your hearing, don't just let it pass. Pull them up on it. Demand to know who they are and WHY they are lying.. Which of the above categories do they fall into: fool, sycophant or knave? If you're really lucky and strike gold, it'll be McCain out electioneering with his new best buddy Joe Lieberman and you can grab the SOB by the throat and demand to know what his little game is in spreading such lies to the American people. Do it! Do it for America!
It's a phrase that's frequently tossed around nowadays, you may have noticed it cropping up ubiquitously yourself! Certainly our bellicose presidential hopeful, John McCain has been keen to repeat it loudly wherever he goes, presumably to give a clear signal to the all-powerful Israel-First lobby that he's their guy and for him at least - the old war-horse that he claims to be - Zionism isn't a dirty word.
But seriously: is there any commonality to be found in the two faiths? In Phaedrus' considered submission, no, there is NONE. Granted, Christ was a Jew - a good man who unaccountably sprung from Jewish loins - something of a miracle in itself, you may think. He grew up to eschew everything Judaism stood for and provoked the anger of the Pharisees to such a degree that they engineered his long and excruciatingly painful death. And that was the end of this not-so-beautiful relationship.
So much then for common factors. Judaism and Christianity are poles apart; more different in every respect even than chalk and cheese. There is no such thing as the "Judeo-Christian Tradition" and anyone who uses this term ought to be regarded with the utmost suspicion, for they are either a willful ignoramus, someone sucking up to the Jews, or else a cunning Jew attempting to revise theology for Israel's benefit.
It's always been something of a mystery to me how come one almost invariably finds the New Testament 'bundled' with the Old. Printing two entirely different books within a single binder doesn't unify two different religions, I'm afraid, much though the Jews would like it to appear so. Christians should properly refuse to accept such editions, for the bulk of them are filled with Evil and ill-disguised Satanism. Only the stuff from AD.0 counts for anything.
The Gods are different, too. The God of the Old Testament - the Jewish God - is a different entity altogether from the God of the New Testament - the father of Jesus. And if you have two distinctly different deities, then there's no way anyone can successfully pass off the lie that the two faiths are in essence of one and the same root. For example, in one unguarded moment, Harold Rosenthal, aide to a fellow Ashkenazi Jew, Senator Jacob Javits, stated in 1976 that: “Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer.”
Of course it's in the Jews' best interests for them to deny this rather disturbing fact. The pretense of a Christian connection helps to make them feel less marginalized in the world for one thing, and no doubt American tax payers feel less irate at having to throw endless piles of their cash at Israel for another, if they can be convinced they're fulfilling a Bible prophesy. And again, we are constantly told that "Israel is our ally." Boy! Some ally! But the fact remains that Jews and Christians are entirely separate faiths and furthermore share neither bloodline nor racial nor ideological characteristics.
So the next time you hear someone use this term within your hearing, don't just let it pass. Pull them up on it. Demand to know who they are and WHY they are lying.. Which of the above categories do they fall into: fool, sycophant or knave? If you're really lucky and strike gold, it'll be McCain out electioneering with his new best buddy Joe Lieberman and you can grab the SOB by the throat and demand to know what his little game is in spreading such lies to the American people. Do it! Do it for America!
Friday, January 25, 2008
An Inflationary Time Bomb
I know I'm not the only one seeing doom ahead, since for just one thing the gold price is being driven by smart money that believes fiat currencies (in particular the dollar) are inevitably going to become exposed as virtually worthless in the medium to longer term. I'm also certain the new boss of the Fed knows this too. But those who govern us are continually postponing the Big Day by once again playing fast and loose with monetary and fiscal policy. Anything rather than have mass lay-offs and vast numbers of unemployed folks spending vast amounts of their newly-found free time reading the words of thought criminals like Phaedrus. We can't have the Plebs waking up to what's really going on, can we? If the recessionary threat isn't as great as these economic measures merit, we can expect a huge surge in prices for just about everything in a year to 18 months from now.
Saturday, January 5, 2008
An Open Letter to Larry Silverstein (repost)
I shall continue to repost this letter periodically until the day comes when Silverslime is placed under Grand Jury investigation over the 17,000 people's lives he ruined on 9/11 2001. I urge others to do likewise. Let's see if we can get an internet bandwagon rolling on this one, guys.
- - -
Dear Mr. Silverstein,
You will doubtless be aware that the internet is overrun with all sorts of lurid conspiracy theories surrounding the events which took place in New York City on the 11th of September 2001. These disturbing rumors are undermining the people's faith in their elected government and calling into question who REALLY runs America today and in precisely WHOSE interest. As the owner of the leases on the World Trade Center site, YOU PERSONALLY are in a unique position to allay people's fears and put an end to the endless conspiracy theories which have only grown stronger and more persistent over the last 6 years.
There are just a few basic questions that you need to address as a matter of great urgency. In doing so you can quash untold numbers of fanciful stories and reassure the public that there was no illicit government involvement in the slaughter of 2,974 innocent Americans on that fateful morning, and that the horrors that took place that day were solely due to Arab terrorists - unassisted by any third party acting on behalf of Israel and/or certain US government agencies.
You are recorded on video as well as radio as having made the following statement (in respect of Tower 7) which I quote here verbatim:
LS: "I remember getting a call from the Fire Department commander to tell me they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire. They said, you know, 'we've had such terrible loss of life that the smartest thing to do is to pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."
Now this statement is unsatisfactory for a number of reasons, not least of which is the fact that I have employed an expert in body language at my own expense who has repeatedly watched the video tape of your above statement and declared your words, with a 98% degree of certainty, to be lies.
Mr. Silverstein, you need to answer just a handful of questions to set the matter to rest. It will only take a few moments of your valuable time and could be a great comfort to the more than 17,000 families which were in various ways, devastated by those 'terrorist attacks.'
1. Who was the Fire Department commander you referred to on that day who recommended that building number 7 be brought down?
2. Why did he only refer to ONE fire when as we all know there were in fact multiple fires, independently documented on film, burning throughout the building?
3. Why do you suppose he recommended a controlled demolition of the building in view of the fact that no other skyscraper in history had ever before collapsed due to fire? What led him to believe this one was a uniquely dangerous exception?
4. Given that the controlled demotion of such a large building typically takes a highly skilled team working 24 hours a day for at least a week to complete, how do you account for the fact that the building was successfully brought down (or "pulled" as you put it) within considerably less than 8 hours?
5. How do you account for the fact that the operation to "pull" the building was carried out in RECORD time on a day when the city of New York was in total and utter chaos and the likelihood of getting ANYONE other than the emergency services to do ANYTHING beyond simply rescuing the trapped and injured was virtually nil???
6. Which (unbelievably efficient) firm was contracted at zero notice and under impossible conditions to undertake the remarkably successful controlled demolition of this massive building in less than a third of just one day? The city of New York may need this valuable recommendation in the event of future attacks.
If you could see your way clear to answering the above points, then I'm sure a lot of folks' minds would be put at ease, and equally importantly, respect and trust in our government could be restored. I look forward to hearing your answers as soon as possible. You know you WILL be compelled to answer before a Grand Jury one day if you don't answer now, so it's best to get it out of the way in advance, don't you think?
Yours in breathless anticipation,
Phaedrus.
- - -
Dear Mr. Silverstein,
You will doubtless be aware that the internet is overrun with all sorts of lurid conspiracy theories surrounding the events which took place in New York City on the 11th of September 2001. These disturbing rumors are undermining the people's faith in their elected government and calling into question who REALLY runs America today and in precisely WHOSE interest. As the owner of the leases on the World Trade Center site, YOU PERSONALLY are in a unique position to allay people's fears and put an end to the endless conspiracy theories which have only grown stronger and more persistent over the last 6 years.
There are just a few basic questions that you need to address as a matter of great urgency. In doing so you can quash untold numbers of fanciful stories and reassure the public that there was no illicit government involvement in the slaughter of 2,974 innocent Americans on that fateful morning, and that the horrors that took place that day were solely due to Arab terrorists - unassisted by any third party acting on behalf of Israel and/or certain US government agencies.
You are recorded on video as well as radio as having made the following statement (in respect of Tower 7) which I quote here verbatim:
LS: "I remember getting a call from the Fire Department commander to tell me they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire. They said, you know, 'we've had such terrible loss of life that the smartest thing to do is to pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."
Now this statement is unsatisfactory for a number of reasons, not least of which is the fact that I have employed an expert in body language at my own expense who has repeatedly watched the video tape of your above statement and declared your words, with a 98% degree of certainty, to be lies.
Mr. Silverstein, you need to answer just a handful of questions to set the matter to rest. It will only take a few moments of your valuable time and could be a great comfort to the more than 17,000 families which were in various ways, devastated by those 'terrorist attacks.'
1. Who was the Fire Department commander you referred to on that day who recommended that building number 7 be brought down?
2. Why did he only refer to ONE fire when as we all know there were in fact multiple fires, independently documented on film, burning throughout the building?
3. Why do you suppose he recommended a controlled demolition of the building in view of the fact that no other skyscraper in history had ever before collapsed due to fire? What led him to believe this one was a uniquely dangerous exception?
4. Given that the controlled demotion of such a large building typically takes a highly skilled team working 24 hours a day for at least a week to complete, how do you account for the fact that the building was successfully brought down (or "pulled" as you put it) within considerably less than 8 hours?
5. How do you account for the fact that the operation to "pull" the building was carried out in RECORD time on a day when the city of New York was in total and utter chaos and the likelihood of getting ANYONE other than the emergency services to do ANYTHING beyond simply rescuing the trapped and injured was virtually nil???
6. Which (unbelievably efficient) firm was contracted at zero notice and under impossible conditions to undertake the remarkably successful controlled demolition of this massive building in less than a third of just one day? The city of New York may need this valuable recommendation in the event of future attacks.
If you could see your way clear to answering the above points, then I'm sure a lot of folks' minds would be put at ease, and equally importantly, respect and trust in our government could be restored. I look forward to hearing your answers as soon as possible. You know you WILL be compelled to answer before a Grand Jury one day if you don't answer now, so it's best to get it out of the way in advance, don't you think?
Yours in breathless anticipation,
Phaedrus.
The Creature Lives Among Us...
Soldiers in uniform quite rightly enjoy the protection of the Geneva Convention. They can clearly be seen to be members of one side or another. No harm should befall them in the event of capture - beyond a temporary period of incarceration and interrogation, of course. Likewise with police officers. Any villain contemplating an attack on a uniformed police officer knows he’s going to get a stiffer sentence if caught. And that’s only fair, too (always provided, of course, that such an attack isn’t carried out for political reasons against an utterly corrupt or illegal regime which is oppressing its citizens and denying their rights.)
In Phaedrus’ opinion, the ultra-orthodox Jew with all the trappings of his faith shouldn’t be victimized for his beliefs, because he makes no secret of them by the open display of certain clothes which render him unmistakably a Jew to whom such beliefs can reasonably be attributed. Phaedrus has a certain respect for those who are open about what they believe in and make no secret of it. It doesn’t mean we have to like such people. They might be Jews, they might be policemen, they might be skinheads; it doesn’t matter. We know where they’re coming from simply by their appearance.
According to our individual political and/or religious preferences, we can modify our behavior accordingly. For example. If Phaedrus sees an Hisadic Jew on the street, he doesn’t indulge in heckling or spitting, at the person as some folks might. Phaedrus fixes the Jew with piercing eye-contact and a slow nod of the head that conveys the unmistakable message, “I know exactly what your game is.” That’s all. Nothing threatening, nor is it intended to be. But the message will have got through, nevertheless, without a single word being spoken. Needless to say if such a Jew coming down the road tried to engage one conversation, it is obvious that it would only be some proposition of benefit to the Jew alone and to the other party’s detriment. So it’s best to simply walk on in silence. If a class of persons can be readily identified on sight, then we can take simple steps to avoid them so no one is put at risk.
Contrast this situation with the first example above. A soldier in wartime who is either out of his uniform in a foreign country, or perhaps worse, wearing the uniform of the other side. Now we have a problem. There is deceit. The rules have been broken. Same applies with some ordinary citizen donning a police uniform. He’s purporting to be something that he isn’t. In both of these instances, unfair advantage can be gained by deception.
This is why we must always, all of us who constitute ‘gentiles’ (non-Jews) at any rate, be ever vigilant for Jews who APPEAR to be just like the rest of us. No religious garb overtly worn to give any indication as to that person’s character, ethnicity, or likely behavior. Jews whose names are not typically Jewish. Jews who have ditched their original family names and adopted common names from the country in which they now live. They don’t follow the Mosaic law like their brethren the Hisadic/Ultra-orthodox Jew does with their characteristic, giveaway hairstyles and beards. They look just like you and me. This kind of Jew Phaedrus refers to as an “Occult Jew” from the Latin word whose root means ‘hidden’ or concealed. Of course, if this person runs a tailoring business or a café or a car dealership, then he’s no ostensible threat to my country or my way of life. So that’s fine. But if he’s running a major corporation, or a bank, a TV station, a newspaper, an advertising agency, or has a job in the government or is trying to form a new political party or whatever; THEN, I’m afraid, we have a problem. This Jew is analogous to the soldier out of uniform. We know his innate beliefs entitle him to treat the rest of us worse than battery chickens for his personal gain. And if he’s in a position of power, then no matter what he may say to the contrary, he’s out to screw us. His Holy book gives him carte blanch to milk us for all we’re worth.
THIS Jew, reader, is the source of 90% of the world’s problems. He’s constantly claiming to be working in our interests and fighting for value, truth, justice – whatever - but in reality he is doing the exact opposite. He is enriching himself at others’ expense.
Prove it to yourself. The next time you see some big business has collapsed as a result of fraud, do a little bit of digging on the internet. Investigate the pasts of the CEO, the Managing Director or the Finance Director. You may be surprised to find that in the VAST MAJORITY of instances, at least one of these key figures will be Jewish. But you’ll hardly ever, in any TV, radio, or newspaper report, be informed of this vital detail. It’s something you have to discover for yourself. And on this point, I wonder why the authorities seem so keen to keep former press baron "Lord Black" out of jail? Will he ever see the inside of the Slammer?
In Phaedrus’ opinion, the ultra-orthodox Jew with all the trappings of his faith shouldn’t be victimized for his beliefs, because he makes no secret of them by the open display of certain clothes which render him unmistakably a Jew to whom such beliefs can reasonably be attributed. Phaedrus has a certain respect for those who are open about what they believe in and make no secret of it. It doesn’t mean we have to like such people. They might be Jews, they might be policemen, they might be skinheads; it doesn’t matter. We know where they’re coming from simply by their appearance.
According to our individual political and/or religious preferences, we can modify our behavior accordingly. For example. If Phaedrus sees an Hisadic Jew on the street, he doesn’t indulge in heckling or spitting, at the person as some folks might. Phaedrus fixes the Jew with piercing eye-contact and a slow nod of the head that conveys the unmistakable message, “I know exactly what your game is.” That’s all. Nothing threatening, nor is it intended to be. But the message will have got through, nevertheless, without a single word being spoken. Needless to say if such a Jew coming down the road tried to engage one conversation, it is obvious that it would only be some proposition of benefit to the Jew alone and to the other party’s detriment. So it’s best to simply walk on in silence. If a class of persons can be readily identified on sight, then we can take simple steps to avoid them so no one is put at risk.
Contrast this situation with the first example above. A soldier in wartime who is either out of his uniform in a foreign country, or perhaps worse, wearing the uniform of the other side. Now we have a problem. There is deceit. The rules have been broken. Same applies with some ordinary citizen donning a police uniform. He’s purporting to be something that he isn’t. In both of these instances, unfair advantage can be gained by deception.
This is why we must always, all of us who constitute ‘gentiles’ (non-Jews) at any rate, be ever vigilant for Jews who APPEAR to be just like the rest of us. No religious garb overtly worn to give any indication as to that person’s character, ethnicity, or likely behavior. Jews whose names are not typically Jewish. Jews who have ditched their original family names and adopted common names from the country in which they now live. They don’t follow the Mosaic law like their brethren the Hisadic/Ultra-orthodox Jew does with their characteristic, giveaway hairstyles and beards. They look just like you and me. This kind of Jew Phaedrus refers to as an “Occult Jew” from the Latin word whose root means ‘hidden’ or concealed. Of course, if this person runs a tailoring business or a café or a car dealership, then he’s no ostensible threat to my country or my way of life. So that’s fine. But if he’s running a major corporation, or a bank, a TV station, a newspaper, an advertising agency, or has a job in the government or is trying to form a new political party or whatever; THEN, I’m afraid, we have a problem. This Jew is analogous to the soldier out of uniform. We know his innate beliefs entitle him to treat the rest of us worse than battery chickens for his personal gain. And if he’s in a position of power, then no matter what he may say to the contrary, he’s out to screw us. His Holy book gives him carte blanch to milk us for all we’re worth.
THIS Jew, reader, is the source of 90% of the world’s problems. He’s constantly claiming to be working in our interests and fighting for value, truth, justice – whatever - but in reality he is doing the exact opposite. He is enriching himself at others’ expense.
Prove it to yourself. The next time you see some big business has collapsed as a result of fraud, do a little bit of digging on the internet. Investigate the pasts of the CEO, the Managing Director or the Finance Director. You may be surprised to find that in the VAST MAJORITY of instances, at least one of these key figures will be Jewish. But you’ll hardly ever, in any TV, radio, or newspaper report, be informed of this vital detail. It’s something you have to discover for yourself. And on this point, I wonder why the authorities seem so keen to keep former press baron "Lord Black" out of jail? Will he ever see the inside of the Slammer?
Monday, December 3, 2007
Russia's election 'unfair' – Jews shown the door
The elections were unfair!! We couldn't get a break!! (bleat, whine, moan, cry, snivel!)
So claim a bunch of Jews and their corrupt cronies masquerading as 'International Observers' who poked their noses in to Russia's private business on Sunday.
Gee, it's just too bad that Russia will now have to soldier on for at least another 5 years without the guiding hand of a Jew on the country's tiller.
Why didn't Putin embrace Western-style open democratic process? Well perhaps he's seen where it's led to in America, where 3,000 innocent citizens were purposely and callously slaughtered on a single day just to drag the country into an illegal war on a sovereign state which had done nothing wrong. Yeah, a great model of democracy to export, that one, isn't it?
Phaedrus would like to congratulate the United Russia party for its outstanding and well-deserved victory!
PS: Kasparov and his fellow-Jewish backers in London had a support level of less than 1% prior to the polls, anyway, so never (thankfully and realistically) stood a hope in hell of wrecking Russia's future.
So claim a bunch of Jews and their corrupt cronies masquerading as 'International Observers' who poked their noses in to Russia's private business on Sunday.
Gee, it's just too bad that Russia will now have to soldier on for at least another 5 years without the guiding hand of a Jew on the country's tiller.
Why didn't Putin embrace Western-style open democratic process? Well perhaps he's seen where it's led to in America, where 3,000 innocent citizens were purposely and callously slaughtered on a single day just to drag the country into an illegal war on a sovereign state which had done nothing wrong. Yeah, a great model of democracy to export, that one, isn't it?
Phaedrus would like to congratulate the United Russia party for its outstanding and well-deserved victory!
PS: Kasparov and his fellow-Jewish backers in London had a support level of less than 1% prior to the polls, anyway, so never (thankfully and realistically) stood a hope in hell of wrecking Russia's future.
Sunday, November 25, 2007
Kasparov attacks Russia (AGAIN)
There's nothing like a prosperous, orderly and well-run country where the vast majority of people are highly satisfied with their government to tempt the Jews out in force to wreck things and bring about rapid and irreversible ruin. Such is sadly the case in Russia today.
Phaedrus has previously reported on this blog that Russia is under attack from the International Jew. Now, yet again, grubby Jew/ex-chess champion Gary Kasparov has been agitating on the streets of Moscow, trying to raise his revolting profile ahead of the country's elections, which are due to take place in the not-too-distant future.
As a result he has now been arrested (again) for holding (another)unauthorized demonstration. He has as a result been jailed for a mere 5 days, so don't expect to have heard the last of him and his Jewish crony backers in London and Washington.
Kasparov's public performances at these rallies more and more mirror those of the Bolsheviks of pre-Revolutionary Russia. The ugly, snub-nosed little worm is a deeply unpleasant orator to have to watch in action. Regular readers will know that Phaedrus doesn't advocate violence, but if someone were to slip Kasparov a dose of Polonium 210, there would be few tears shed over this keyboard.
Phaedrus has previously reported on this blog that Russia is under attack from the International Jew. Now, yet again, grubby Jew/ex-chess champion Gary Kasparov has been agitating on the streets of Moscow, trying to raise his revolting profile ahead of the country's elections, which are due to take place in the not-too-distant future.
As a result he has now been arrested (again) for holding (another)unauthorized demonstration. He has as a result been jailed for a mere 5 days, so don't expect to have heard the last of him and his Jewish crony backers in London and Washington.
Kasparov's public performances at these rallies more and more mirror those of the Bolsheviks of pre-Revolutionary Russia. The ugly, snub-nosed little worm is a deeply unpleasant orator to have to watch in action. Regular readers will know that Phaedrus doesn't advocate violence, but if someone were to slip Kasparov a dose of Polonium 210, there would be few tears shed over this keyboard.
Thursday, October 18, 2007
Ever been caught by a "Jew Clause"?
Have you or has anyone you know ever been caught out by a 'Jew Clause'?
Any legal document that confers rights and obligations between parties sets out clearly what each side must provide for the agreement to be fulfilled. But by the insertion of a Jew Clause (typically buried somewhere towards the end of the document in seemingly innocuous phraseology) all or some of the rights created by the document can be removed altogether or otherwise restricted so as to become next to worthless.
Phaedrus has chosen the term Jew Clause to describe such a provision because it is pretty obvious who initially conceived of the concept and so therefore it is only proper that they should be honored by having this legal device named after them. Here's a real-life example taken from the text of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights:
Article 19.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
Sounds pretty neat and reassuring, huh? Even if we didn't have the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights, we could still rely on the protection afforded by the UDHR to save our asses from the Enemies of Truth, right? - WRONG!!
Now here comes the Jew Clause (and surprise, surprise, it's buried virtually at the end of the Declaration and forms the penultimate sub-clause by which time most decent folks would be asleep):
Article 29
[1...2...]
(3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
Oh boy! That's kind of pulled the rug out! The effect of this renders the protection afforded by the freedom of expression clause virtually worthless, because you're only protected if you parrot the ethos and/or founding principles of the UN! Deviate from the official UN line and you could be in deep do-do and lose all legal protection. For example: you're protected if you say that all men are created equal and the blacks and whites are inherently no different. But if you say that the UN stinks and Jews run the world, you're riding bareback, pal!
Please be aware that Jew Clauses crop up in all sorts of legal agreements; not just in pan-national treaties and declarations. If you simply CANNOT avoid having dealings with a jew, or the person with whom you're dealing employs a shyster Jewish lawyer, then I beg you to take the greatest care: SEARCH FOR JEW CLAUSE. Please pass this information on as it may one day save some decent person's hide from the predations of the Jews.
Any legal document that confers rights and obligations between parties sets out clearly what each side must provide for the agreement to be fulfilled. But by the insertion of a Jew Clause (typically buried somewhere towards the end of the document in seemingly innocuous phraseology) all or some of the rights created by the document can be removed altogether or otherwise restricted so as to become next to worthless.
Phaedrus has chosen the term Jew Clause to describe such a provision because it is pretty obvious who initially conceived of the concept and so therefore it is only proper that they should be honored by having this legal device named after them. Here's a real-life example taken from the text of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights:
Article 19.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
Sounds pretty neat and reassuring, huh? Even if we didn't have the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights, we could still rely on the protection afforded by the UDHR to save our asses from the Enemies of Truth, right? - WRONG!!
Now here comes the Jew Clause (and surprise, surprise, it's buried virtually at the end of the Declaration and forms the penultimate sub-clause by which time most decent folks would be asleep):
Article 29
[1...2...]
(3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
Oh boy! That's kind of pulled the rug out! The effect of this renders the protection afforded by the freedom of expression clause virtually worthless, because you're only protected if you parrot the ethos and/or founding principles of the UN! Deviate from the official UN line and you could be in deep do-do and lose all legal protection. For example: you're protected if you say that all men are created equal and the blacks and whites are inherently no different. But if you say that the UN stinks and Jews run the world, you're riding bareback, pal!
Please be aware that Jew Clauses crop up in all sorts of legal agreements; not just in pan-national treaties and declarations. If you simply CANNOT avoid having dealings with a jew, or the person with whom you're dealing employs a shyster Jewish lawyer, then I beg you to take the greatest care: SEARCH FOR JEW CLAUSE. Please pass this information on as it may one day save some decent person's hide from the predations of the Jews.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
