Phaedrus spent most of last night awake, going through all the policy aspects that define so-called Western democracy nowadays in an attempt to find some core principles that could be attributed to Jewish interests. Phaedrus initially envisaged discerning maybe 5 at most. The end result of this sleepless night, however, gave rise to very many more. I've set them out below, so let’s examine what the agenda of these poisonous reptiles consists of..
Elimination of national frontiers/borders.
Elimination of foreign currency exchange controls word-wide to aid unimpeded capital flight.
The imposition of the chosen Jewish method of control – so called ‘democracy’ world wide.
Complete control of television, radio, newspapers, periodicals, magazines and advertising.
The encouragement of interbreeding between races.
The encouragement of unsustainable levels of immigration in Europe and the United States, whether legal or not.
Proxy control of Western governments (and that of Russia).
Direct control of international finance and banking.
The formation of ever-larger eco-political blocs and free-trade regions with uniform rules and standards that will one day all be merged to form the One World Government, which they of course will control.
The propagation of the mind virus that ‘political correctness’ is the enlightened, modern way to go and its rejectionists as in some way wicked and/or horribly old-fashioned.
The erosion of the 1st Amendment in the United States.
Stricter gun control measures in the United States.
The promotion via their media holdings of homosexuality, black/white mixed-race relationships and any other forms of aberrant and socially harmful behavior.
Engendering the idea through media control that blacks are superior to what they really are and whites are in fact, inferior to what they really are.
The idea that homosexuals and lesbians should be proud of what they are.
The restriction of free speech on the Internet.
The propagation of the concept of ‘Hate Crime’ – reminiscent of George Orwell’s ‘Thought Crime’ in his prescient, dystopian novel, Nineteen Eighty-Four.
The encouragement of under-age sex preferably with other races through their numerous teenage magazine titles (the theft of childhood/theft of innocence).
Elimination of trade barriers and the creation of a global, business-friendly trading environment giving rise to massive job losses in Europe and America.
The debasement of traditional family values and the destruction of the family unit.
To ridicule and debase Christianity and other mainstream religions and anyone who dares uphold moral values.
To campaign for intolerance of `racism' and `homophobia.'
The promotion of “Affirmative Action” type programs that put the interests of hopelessly incompetent blacks ahead of struggling, hard working white business people.
The generation of internecine strife between Arabs.
The generation of inter-cultural tension in countries that have adopted Jew-promoted ‘multiculturalism.’
The expansion of a ‘Greater Israel’ into what remains of Palestine.
And remember from those Talmud quotes that the Jew really doesn’t give a damn about the damage he does to us in the realization of these aims. Unbelievably but true, to the Jews, we are no more than a sub-human peasant underclass to be exploited for their benefit and if they should damage or even destroy us on the way, then they will be rewarded in heaven for doing (their) God’s will. The Ten Commandments only apply between Jews; the gentiles do not enjoy their protection. That’s what they believe. The Talmud tells them so.
Wednesday, May 23, 2007
Tuesday, May 22, 2007
World Bank - will the next Jew kindly step forward!
US President and Traitor George W. Bush will shortly announce the successor to Paul Wolfowitz as head of the World Bank. The appointment pays incredibly well for very little work, so no prizes for guessing the ethnicity of the eventual lucky winner.
Why the Jews cannot be trusted to run the media
Phaedrus has just finished reading the autobiography of one of America’s greatest ever citizens: Benjamin Franklin.
But there’s a curious problem with it. Whilst Franklin was very Jew-sceptic, no direct references to the Jews could be found in this suspiciously slim volume. This edition described itself as Franklin‘s "unabridged autobiography" so it seemed quite inexplicable how the Jews could have been so carelessly omitted from it. For example, here’s one of Franklin’s best-known quotes from his address to the earliest American legislators:
"There is a great danger for the United States of America. That great danger is the Jew. Gentlemen , in whichever land the Jews have settled, they have depressed the moral level and lowered the degree of commercial honesty. They have created a State within a State, and when they are opposed, they attempted to strangle the nation financially as in the case of Portugal and Spain."
"For more than 1700 years they have lamented their sorrowful fate, namely that they were driven out of the motherland; but gentlemen, if the civilized world today should give them back Palestine as their property , they would immediately find pressing reasons for not returning there. Why? Because they are vampires and cannot live on other vampires. They cannot live among themselves. They must live among Christians and others who do not belong to their race."
"If they are not excluded from the United States by the Constitution, within less than a hundred years they will stream into our country in such numbers that they will rule and destroy us, and change our form of government for which Americans have shed their blood and sacrificed life, property and personal freedom. If the Jews are not excluded, within 200 years our children will be working in the fields to feed the Jews, while they remain in the Counting House gleefully rubbing their hands."
"I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jews forever, your children`s children will curse you in your graves."
"Their ideas are not those of Americans. The leopard cannot change his spots. The Jews are a danger to this land, and if they are allowed to enter, they will imperil its institutions."
"They should be excluded by the Constitution."
One may therefore infer from this that Franklin was quite passionate about his views of the Jew! So why no references to Jews in his so-called "autobiography"? The copy Phaedrus had obtained had, unfortunately, been uhm, 'edited' by the Jewish publishing house that printed it. This is a surprisingly common tactic and goes a good way to explaining why the Jews have this obsession with ownership and control of TV, radio and publishing. Another notable example of this gerrymandering with the truth was after World War 2 when they printed hundreds of thousands of copies of Hitler’s Mein Kampf! A curious thing for the Jews to do, one might imagine, until one is informed that the Jewish edition had removed all references to the basis of Hitler’s antisemitism. It was quite impossible to discern from the Jewish edition exactly what the Jews had done to warrant their dreadful treatment under the Nazis.
The lessons are clear. Since 96% of the world’s media is today controlled by Jews (source: Jew Watch) we cannot trust it to inform us of what’s really going on and provide any insight into why the world is the fucked-up place that it is. So let’s not waste any more time watching Fox News, the BBC or CNN. These organizations are Jew-controlled, just like virtually all our newspapers, radio stations and magazines are. THE MEDIA DEMONSTRABLY CANNOT BE TRUSTED.
But there’s a curious problem with it. Whilst Franklin was very Jew-sceptic, no direct references to the Jews could be found in this suspiciously slim volume. This edition described itself as Franklin‘s "unabridged autobiography" so it seemed quite inexplicable how the Jews could have been so carelessly omitted from it. For example, here’s one of Franklin’s best-known quotes from his address to the earliest American legislators:
"There is a great danger for the United States of America. That great danger is the Jew. Gentlemen , in whichever land the Jews have settled, they have depressed the moral level and lowered the degree of commercial honesty. They have created a State within a State, and when they are opposed, they attempted to strangle the nation financially as in the case of Portugal and Spain."
"For more than 1700 years they have lamented their sorrowful fate, namely that they were driven out of the motherland; but gentlemen, if the civilized world today should give them back Palestine as their property , they would immediately find pressing reasons for not returning there. Why? Because they are vampires and cannot live on other vampires. They cannot live among themselves. They must live among Christians and others who do not belong to their race."
"If they are not excluded from the United States by the Constitution, within less than a hundred years they will stream into our country in such numbers that they will rule and destroy us, and change our form of government for which Americans have shed their blood and sacrificed life, property and personal freedom. If the Jews are not excluded, within 200 years our children will be working in the fields to feed the Jews, while they remain in the Counting House gleefully rubbing their hands."
"I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jews forever, your children`s children will curse you in your graves."
"Their ideas are not those of Americans. The leopard cannot change his spots. The Jews are a danger to this land, and if they are allowed to enter, they will imperil its institutions."
"They should be excluded by the Constitution."
One may therefore infer from this that Franklin was quite passionate about his views of the Jew! So why no references to Jews in his so-called "autobiography"? The copy Phaedrus had obtained had, unfortunately, been uhm, 'edited' by the Jewish publishing house that printed it. This is a surprisingly common tactic and goes a good way to explaining why the Jews have this obsession with ownership and control of TV, radio and publishing. Another notable example of this gerrymandering with the truth was after World War 2 when they printed hundreds of thousands of copies of Hitler’s Mein Kampf! A curious thing for the Jews to do, one might imagine, until one is informed that the Jewish edition had removed all references to the basis of Hitler’s antisemitism. It was quite impossible to discern from the Jewish edition exactly what the Jews had done to warrant their dreadful treatment under the Nazis.
The lessons are clear. Since 96% of the world’s media is today controlled by Jews (source: Jew Watch) we cannot trust it to inform us of what’s really going on and provide any insight into why the world is the fucked-up place that it is. So let’s not waste any more time watching Fox News, the BBC or CNN. These organizations are Jew-controlled, just like virtually all our newspapers, radio stations and magazines are. THE MEDIA DEMONSTRABLY CANNOT BE TRUSTED.
Monday, May 21, 2007
That N-Word again...
Phaedrus was enjoying an anniversary meal with his lovely wife, celebrating our 10th wedding anniversary in a quiet, respectable restaurant in a perfectly unremarkable mid-western town, when in strode an out-of-town nigger. Now “nigger” is NOT a word that Phaedrus likes to use. But in this instance it is the only appropriate one, as acknowledged by the villain of the piece himself, no less.
We were half-way through the main course when this NIGGER wearing a baggy, ill-fitting, pin-striped suit burst through the doors of the restaurant with half-a-dozen of his “homies” in tow and loudly blurted out to all: “SAY – CAN A NIGGER GET HIS DICK SUCKED HERE???”
There was much amusement at this outburst on the part of this nigger’s entourage. They seemed to think the whole thing immensely funny and were making with “high fives” between themselves in celebration of this disgusting utterance. They patted the orator on the back heartily and escorted him out of the building, joking about it between themselves. There was, however, nothing but a cowed silence among the (mainly white) diners.
Phaedrus would like to state here and now that, had our precious little girl been present at this dinner, the NIGGER in question would now be nothing more than a chalk outline on the restaurant floor. Thank God for concealed-carry and Liberal gun laws. New Yorkers eat your hearts out!
Just to finish up, a parting thought: not all niggers are black and not all blacks are niggers. Examples: Eminem: White Nigger (“whigger”). Snoop Dogg: NIGGER. The black guy who rescued someone from being run over by a New York subway train: Black, but definitely NOT a Nigger. Nelson Mandela: NOT a nigger; Robert Mugabe: NIGGER.
Phaedrus accepts that he’s likely to offend just about EVERYONE with this posting, but if so, that’s just Too Bad! Truth is all that matters. Long live Free Speech!!
We were half-way through the main course when this NIGGER wearing a baggy, ill-fitting, pin-striped suit burst through the doors of the restaurant with half-a-dozen of his “homies” in tow and loudly blurted out to all: “SAY – CAN A NIGGER GET HIS DICK SUCKED HERE???”
There was much amusement at this outburst on the part of this nigger’s entourage. They seemed to think the whole thing immensely funny and were making with “high fives” between themselves in celebration of this disgusting utterance. They patted the orator on the back heartily and escorted him out of the building, joking about it between themselves. There was, however, nothing but a cowed silence among the (mainly white) diners.
Phaedrus would like to state here and now that, had our precious little girl been present at this dinner, the NIGGER in question would now be nothing more than a chalk outline on the restaurant floor. Thank God for concealed-carry and Liberal gun laws. New Yorkers eat your hearts out!
Just to finish up, a parting thought: not all niggers are black and not all blacks are niggers. Examples: Eminem: White Nigger (“whigger”). Snoop Dogg: NIGGER. The black guy who rescued someone from being run over by a New York subway train: Black, but definitely NOT a Nigger. Nelson Mandela: NOT a nigger; Robert Mugabe: NIGGER.
Phaedrus accepts that he’s likely to offend just about EVERYONE with this posting, but if so, that’s just Too Bad! Truth is all that matters. Long live Free Speech!!
China: the Last Beacon of Liberty?!?!
Russia has been taking a pounding lately from the “International Community” (Jews infesting the exterior ministries of Western countries in other words) on it’s democratic credentials. The country has been accused of “backsliding on democracy” (in other words, making it difficult for the Jews to take it over).
So much attention directed to Russia! But should not China more properly be the main target of Western castigation?
China will as likely as not become the world’s largest economy a relatively short time from now. It’s already a major, major international player on the world stage and is nuked-up to the eyeballs with ICBMs and conventional weapons and is currently engaged in a huge conventional arms upgrade program.
The first delicate whiffs of democracy in China where snuffed out in 1989 with the infamous Tiananmen Square Massacre. There were howls of anguish in the West back then, but since that time, somewhat surprisingly, a very conspicuous silence…. The sole exception in the last 15 years was Dick Cheney’s recent grumblings that China’s pace of re-armament wasn’t commensurate with it’s defense needs in the region. And that was that. All very muted indeed.
America in particular is always taking other countries to task over their human rights records, or else lambasting them for being anti-democratic or denying freedom of expression. But nothing these days is being said about China, which has an utterly appalling record in all these aspects. This omission strikes Phaedrus as most curious!
The answer to this curious contradiction can now be revealed, however…
Consider the 5 permanent members of the UN Security Council (the nearest thing yet to a single World Government – the Jews’ ultimate goal). It comprises the United States, Britain, France, Russia and China.
Both the United States and Britain are now effectively ruled from Israel and have been for some years. And since the French presidential elections, France is now also the latest puppet of Israel with the Jew Sarkozy having won power in that country . Moreover, Russia is under attack from Jews both at home and abroad and if Putin does not stand firm, Russia too will fall to Israeli control. That would give Israel control of 4 of the 5 permanent seats, leaving only China to topple. But China is unconquerable by vested Jewish interests. Why? Because the Occult Jew can pass himself off as an American. He can pass himself off as a Brit. He can pass himself off as French, Russian, Hungarian, Italian, Australian, whatever. But he can never pass himself off as Chinese. He can never infiltrate this ancient, oriental race. His facial features simply don’t fit. He would stand out like a sore thumb. And that is just what a Jew CANNOT afford to do. Therefore if Russia falls to the Jew, the only hope for world peace lies with the Chinese! God help us all.
So much attention directed to Russia! But should not China more properly be the main target of Western castigation?
China will as likely as not become the world’s largest economy a relatively short time from now. It’s already a major, major international player on the world stage and is nuked-up to the eyeballs with ICBMs and conventional weapons and is currently engaged in a huge conventional arms upgrade program.
The first delicate whiffs of democracy in China where snuffed out in 1989 with the infamous Tiananmen Square Massacre. There were howls of anguish in the West back then, but since that time, somewhat surprisingly, a very conspicuous silence…. The sole exception in the last 15 years was Dick Cheney’s recent grumblings that China’s pace of re-armament wasn’t commensurate with it’s defense needs in the region. And that was that. All very muted indeed.
America in particular is always taking other countries to task over their human rights records, or else lambasting them for being anti-democratic or denying freedom of expression. But nothing these days is being said about China, which has an utterly appalling record in all these aspects. This omission strikes Phaedrus as most curious!
The answer to this curious contradiction can now be revealed, however…
Consider the 5 permanent members of the UN Security Council (the nearest thing yet to a single World Government – the Jews’ ultimate goal). It comprises the United States, Britain, France, Russia and China.
Both the United States and Britain are now effectively ruled from Israel and have been for some years. And since the French presidential elections, France is now also the latest puppet of Israel with the Jew Sarkozy having won power in that country . Moreover, Russia is under attack from Jews both at home and abroad and if Putin does not stand firm, Russia too will fall to Israeli control. That would give Israel control of 4 of the 5 permanent seats, leaving only China to topple. But China is unconquerable by vested Jewish interests. Why? Because the Occult Jew can pass himself off as an American. He can pass himself off as a Brit. He can pass himself off as French, Russian, Hungarian, Italian, Australian, whatever. But he can never pass himself off as Chinese. He can never infiltrate this ancient, oriental race. His facial features simply don’t fit. He would stand out like a sore thumb. And that is just what a Jew CANNOT afford to do. Therefore if Russia falls to the Jew, the only hope for world peace lies with the Chinese! God help us all.
Saturday, May 19, 2007
Re-defining National Identity
There are moves afoot in the West to redefine nationality; to mould its meaning into something Jew-approved which has no basis whatever in fact.
This movement is nowhere more advanced than in Britain, where the subject of “Britishness” and what it means to be British and “British Values” are and have been for some years the subject of much revision. The chief architects of re-defining “Britishness” are, as one would expect, our old friends the Jews, working in partnership with their colleagues in the BBC. “Englishness” is akin to Nazism. It is only ever referred to in derisory terms and mostly, reference to it is avoided altogether. The annual exception to this being on St. George’s Day, when the BBC takes the opportunity to rubbish this historical figure, the patron saint of England, and to defame and ridicule him. Rallying points and figures around nationalism terrify the Jews in the BBC; they smack too strongly of German National Socialism and must be totally effaced, such is their perceived threat to this much-persecuted minority.
The biggest joke of all was when the BBC took it upon themselves to redefine “Britishness” for the 21st Century. To do this, they approached noted comedian Stephen Fry, who they described as the “Quintessential Englishman” and that is precisely how he APPEARS at face value. So how did Fry define “Britishness”?
“It’s all about civility, respect for others, tolerance, understanding and modesty.” replied Fry, pompously.
Phaedrus was at once struck by the stark dichotomy between this assessment and the reality of 21st Century Britain. This is the country which gave rise to probably the richest vocabulary in the world of derogatory terms for foreigners and homosexuals.
There is no history whatsoever of tolerance in Britain – quite the opposite in fact. So why try assert otherwise? The answer is quite simple. Though appearing to be the ‘quintessential Englishman’ Fry is in fact an occult JEW, simply doing his bit to advance the Jewish-Internationalist agenda. “Immigrants are an asset; we need immigration!” they constantly scream. “Don’t fear the foreigner – make him welcome” said the country’s Chief Rabbi, Johnathan Sachs. Phaedrus would like to ask Rabbi Sachs what welcoming the foreigner ever did for the north American native Indian!
The above example is but one of many. There is a deliberate policy among ALL the Jew-controlled countries of the West to encourage immigration and to dilute and disperse the indigenous population by any means. The reasons behind this will be apparent to those in the know, but for those who aren’t yet, it will be the subject of a forthcoming posting.
This movement is nowhere more advanced than in Britain, where the subject of “Britishness” and what it means to be British and “British Values” are and have been for some years the subject of much revision. The chief architects of re-defining “Britishness” are, as one would expect, our old friends the Jews, working in partnership with their colleagues in the BBC. “Englishness” is akin to Nazism. It is only ever referred to in derisory terms and mostly, reference to it is avoided altogether. The annual exception to this being on St. George’s Day, when the BBC takes the opportunity to rubbish this historical figure, the patron saint of England, and to defame and ridicule him. Rallying points and figures around nationalism terrify the Jews in the BBC; they smack too strongly of German National Socialism and must be totally effaced, such is their perceived threat to this much-persecuted minority.
The biggest joke of all was when the BBC took it upon themselves to redefine “Britishness” for the 21st Century. To do this, they approached noted comedian Stephen Fry, who they described as the “Quintessential Englishman” and that is precisely how he APPEARS at face value. So how did Fry define “Britishness”?
“It’s all about civility, respect for others, tolerance, understanding and modesty.” replied Fry, pompously.
Phaedrus was at once struck by the stark dichotomy between this assessment and the reality of 21st Century Britain. This is the country which gave rise to probably the richest vocabulary in the world of derogatory terms for foreigners and homosexuals.
There is no history whatsoever of tolerance in Britain – quite the opposite in fact. So why try assert otherwise? The answer is quite simple. Though appearing to be the ‘quintessential Englishman’ Fry is in fact an occult JEW, simply doing his bit to advance the Jewish-Internationalist agenda. “Immigrants are an asset; we need immigration!” they constantly scream. “Don’t fear the foreigner – make him welcome” said the country’s Chief Rabbi, Johnathan Sachs. Phaedrus would like to ask Rabbi Sachs what welcoming the foreigner ever did for the north American native Indian!
The above example is but one of many. There is a deliberate policy among ALL the Jew-controlled countries of the West to encourage immigration and to dilute and disperse the indigenous population by any means. The reasons behind this will be apparent to those in the know, but for those who aren’t yet, it will be the subject of a forthcoming posting.
Mrs. Merkel lectures Russia on how to run itself!
Should she not first sort out the scandal of Germany’s abandoned/neglected/abused children? Or the scourge of unemployment in the country’s north east? Or the colossal burden of burocracy and taxation choking German businesses? She seems to have her priorities all wrong.
It isn’t as if democracy in Russia epitomizes a long tradition of free democratic choice, as in Britain and the US it once did. And what business is it of the West how Russia is run, anyway? The vast majority of Russians are very pleased indeed with the transformation Putin has delivered from the wreckage left behind by the West’s great friend, Boris Yeltsin. It is only the carping of a few, self-interested Jews that roused a tiny rabble of malcontents, backed by the Jews of Israel, the US and the UK that find fault with the system, because they have been denied the opportunity to milk its success for themselves.
If these parasites are detained at the airport for just 2 hours – whether their passports were in order or not is immaterial – it is simply not newsworthy. Meanwhile, tens of thousands of women and children are trafficked and prostituted every day from the far east into Europe and no one seems anything like as much concerned about this truly awful state of affairs. Likewise the latest Israeli attacks on Palestine. Talk about pouring water on a drowning man. It seems to merit but muted media reports, but no action whatever from the so-called “international community” – a euphemism for the West’s Jew-riddled exterior ministries.
The best thing Putin can do is not even to dignify the existence of the Jewish opposition in his country and to those abroad who seek to support them, he should simply say quite bluntly, “Sorry, if our oil and gas isn’t good enough for you, you don’t have to take it. We’ll sell it to China instead.”
Russia needs no favors from anyone. It is on its feet again. It is still a major nuclear power to be reckoned with and it is very, very mineral-rich. It can afford the luxury of telling the Jew-controlled West to go to hell.
It isn’t as if democracy in Russia epitomizes a long tradition of free democratic choice, as in Britain and the US it once did. And what business is it of the West how Russia is run, anyway? The vast majority of Russians are very pleased indeed with the transformation Putin has delivered from the wreckage left behind by the West’s great friend, Boris Yeltsin. It is only the carping of a few, self-interested Jews that roused a tiny rabble of malcontents, backed by the Jews of Israel, the US and the UK that find fault with the system, because they have been denied the opportunity to milk its success for themselves.
If these parasites are detained at the airport for just 2 hours – whether their passports were in order or not is immaterial – it is simply not newsworthy. Meanwhile, tens of thousands of women and children are trafficked and prostituted every day from the far east into Europe and no one seems anything like as much concerned about this truly awful state of affairs. Likewise the latest Israeli attacks on Palestine. Talk about pouring water on a drowning man. It seems to merit but muted media reports, but no action whatever from the so-called “international community” – a euphemism for the West’s Jew-riddled exterior ministries.
The best thing Putin can do is not even to dignify the existence of the Jewish opposition in his country and to those abroad who seek to support them, he should simply say quite bluntly, “Sorry, if our oil and gas isn’t good enough for you, you don’t have to take it. We’ll sell it to China instead.”
Russia needs no favors from anyone. It is on its feet again. It is still a major nuclear power to be reckoned with and it is very, very mineral-rich. It can afford the luxury of telling the Jew-controlled West to go to hell.
Friday, May 18, 2007
Happy Birthday Alan Johnston
If you hadn’t been a permanent staff member of a Jewish-run news organisation like the BBC you’d probably have been released many weeks ago.
Paul Wolfowitz - the Golden Goodbye
Clearly the man values his job to be clinging on so tenaciously. So why quit today of all days?
Phaedrus suspects negotiations have been taking place in secret (no, not THOSE negotiations) to pay Wolfie off in a face-saving exercise whereby the architect of the Iraq war can walk away with this head held high and his honor in tact – yeah, right!
It is an inescapable conclusion that the Jew has been awarded a very generous early-severance package: a golden handshake if you will. And knowing Wolfie, it will indeed be generous. Phaedrus predicts that the World Bank’s aid budget for next year will have to be slashed drastically to fund it. But hey-ho, that’s what the Bank was set up for in the first place: fleecing the American tax-payer.
Phaedrus suspects negotiations have been taking place in secret (no, not THOSE negotiations) to pay Wolfie off in a face-saving exercise whereby the architect of the Iraq war can walk away with this head held high and his honor in tact – yeah, right!
It is an inescapable conclusion that the Jew has been awarded a very generous early-severance package: a golden handshake if you will. And knowing Wolfie, it will indeed be generous. Phaedrus predicts that the World Bank’s aid budget for next year will have to be slashed drastically to fund it. But hey-ho, that’s what the Bank was set up for in the first place: fleecing the American tax-payer.
An uncertain future for Prince Harry
Prince Harry
The British Army general who has pulled Prince Harry back from active service in war-ravaged Iraq may or may not have saved his life and the lives of others who would have been in his unit, but he has destroyed the ambitious young man’s career for sure. The decision makes sense from a tactical point of view, but it plays very badly in all other respects. Yes, it’s a victory of sorts for the insurgency, but more significantly for Harry, he will never now carry the gravitas to command troops anywhere at any time.
As a future commander there will forever be the lingering stain on his reputation that he was given preferential treatment and kept out of harm’s way on account of his family background. This is terribly unfair to the young Prince, whom Phaedrus believes to be a genuinely decent and courageous young man whose desire to show his mettle has been cruelly thwarted by circumstance. But any men under his future command simply won’t regard him with any real respect of the kind that is only granted to those who’ve been up to their necks in muck and flying bullets. He should now seriously consider his position.
The British Army general who has pulled Prince Harry back from active service in war-ravaged Iraq may or may not have saved his life and the lives of others who would have been in his unit, but he has destroyed the ambitious young man’s career for sure. The decision makes sense from a tactical point of view, but it plays very badly in all other respects. Yes, it’s a victory of sorts for the insurgency, but more significantly for Harry, he will never now carry the gravitas to command troops anywhere at any time.
As a future commander there will forever be the lingering stain on his reputation that he was given preferential treatment and kept out of harm’s way on account of his family background. This is terribly unfair to the young Prince, whom Phaedrus believes to be a genuinely decent and courageous young man whose desire to show his mettle has been cruelly thwarted by circumstance. But any men under his future command simply won’t regard him with any real respect of the kind that is only granted to those who’ve been up to their necks in muck and flying bullets. He should now seriously consider his position.
Not all Jews are out to get us...
Soldiers in uniform quite rightly enjoy the protection of the Geneva Convention. They can clearly be seen to be members of one side or another. No harm should befall them in the event of capture - beyond a temporary period of incarceration and interrogation, of course. Likewise with police officers. Any villain contemplating an attack on a uniformed police officer knows he’s going to get a stiffer sentence if caught. And that’s only fair, too (always provided, of course, that such an attack isn’t carried out for political reasons against an utterly corrupt or illegal regime which is oppressing its citizens and denying their rights.)
In Phaedrus’ opinion, the ultra-orthodox Jew with all the trappings of his faith shouldn’t be victimized for his beliefs, because he makes no secret of them by the open display of certain clothes which render him unmistakably a Jew to whom such beliefs can reasonably be attributed. Phaedrus has a certain respect for those who are open about what they believe in and make no secret of it. It doesn’t mean we have to like such people. They might be Jews, they might be policemen, they might be skinheads; it doesn’t matter. We know where they’re coming from simply by their appearance.
According to our individual political and/or religious preferences, we can modify our behavior accordingly. For example. If Phaedrus sees an Hisadic Jew on the street, he doesn’t indulge in heckling or spitting, at the person as some folks might. Phaedrus fixes the Jew with piercing eye-contact and a slow nod of the head that conveys the unmistakable message, “I know what your game is.” That’s all. Nothing threatening, nor is it intended to be. But the message will have got through, nevertheless, without a single word being spoken. Needless to say if such a Jew coming down the road tried to engage one conversation, it is obvious that it would only be some proposition of benefit to the Jew alone and to the other party’s detriment. So it’s best to simply walk on in silence. If a class of persons can be readily identified on sight, then we can take simple steps to avoid them no one’s endangered.
Contrast this situation with the first example above. A soldier in wartime who is either out of his uniform in a foreign country, or perhaps worse, wearing the uniform of the other side. Now we have a problem. There is deceit. The rules have been broken. Same applies with some ordinary citizen donning a police uniform. He’s purporting to be something that he isn’t. In both of these instances, unfair advantage can be gained by deception.
This is why we must always, all of us who constitute ‘gentiles’ (non-Jews) at any rate, be ever vigilant for Jews who APPEAR to be just like the rest of us. No religious garb overtly worn to give any indication as to that person’s character, ethnicity, or likely behavior. Jews whose names are not typically Jewish. Jews who have ditched their original family names and adopted common names from the country in which they now live. They don’t follow the Mosaic law like their brethren the Hisadic/Ultraorthodox Jew does with their characteristic, giveaway hairstyles and beards. They look just like you and me. This kind of Jew Phaedrus refers to as an “Occult Jew” from the Latin word whose root means ‘hidden’ or concealed. Of course, if this person runs a tailoring business or a café or a car dealership, then he’s no ostensible threat to my country or my way of life. So that’s fine. But if he’s running a major corporation, or a bank, a TV station, a newspaper, an advertising agency, or has a job in the government or is trying to form a new political party or whatever; THEN, I’m afraid, we have a problem. This Jew is analogous to the soldier out of uniform. We know his innate beliefs entitle him to treat the rest of us worse than battery chickens for his personal gain. And if he’s in a position of power, then no matter what he may say to the contrary, he’s out to screw us. His Holy book gives him carte blanche to milk us for all we’re worth.
THIS Jew, reader, is the source of 90% of the world’s problems. He’s constantly claiming to be working in our interests and fighting for value, truth, justice – whatever - but in reality he is doing the exact opposite. He is enriching himself at others’ expense.
Prove it to yourself. The next time you see some big business has collapsed as a result of fraud, do a little bit of digging on the internet. Investigate the pasts of the CEO, the Managing Director or the Finance Director. You may be surprised to find that in the VAST MAJORITY of instances, at least one of these key figures will be Jewish. But you’ll hardly ever, in any TV, radio, or newspaper report, be informed of this vital detail. It’s something you have to discover for yourself…
Here, let us make things easy for your first investigation: LORD BLACK, formerly of Hollinger International. Black is simply the latest in a long, long, long line of Jewish crooks going back centuries. Happy investigations…
In Phaedrus’ opinion, the ultra-orthodox Jew with all the trappings of his faith shouldn’t be victimized for his beliefs, because he makes no secret of them by the open display of certain clothes which render him unmistakably a Jew to whom such beliefs can reasonably be attributed. Phaedrus has a certain respect for those who are open about what they believe in and make no secret of it. It doesn’t mean we have to like such people. They might be Jews, they might be policemen, they might be skinheads; it doesn’t matter. We know where they’re coming from simply by their appearance.
According to our individual political and/or religious preferences, we can modify our behavior accordingly. For example. If Phaedrus sees an Hisadic Jew on the street, he doesn’t indulge in heckling or spitting, at the person as some folks might. Phaedrus fixes the Jew with piercing eye-contact and a slow nod of the head that conveys the unmistakable message, “I know what your game is.” That’s all. Nothing threatening, nor is it intended to be. But the message will have got through, nevertheless, without a single word being spoken. Needless to say if such a Jew coming down the road tried to engage one conversation, it is obvious that it would only be some proposition of benefit to the Jew alone and to the other party’s detriment. So it’s best to simply walk on in silence. If a class of persons can be readily identified on sight, then we can take simple steps to avoid them no one’s endangered.
Contrast this situation with the first example above. A soldier in wartime who is either out of his uniform in a foreign country, or perhaps worse, wearing the uniform of the other side. Now we have a problem. There is deceit. The rules have been broken. Same applies with some ordinary citizen donning a police uniform. He’s purporting to be something that he isn’t. In both of these instances, unfair advantage can be gained by deception.
This is why we must always, all of us who constitute ‘gentiles’ (non-Jews) at any rate, be ever vigilant for Jews who APPEAR to be just like the rest of us. No religious garb overtly worn to give any indication as to that person’s character, ethnicity, or likely behavior. Jews whose names are not typically Jewish. Jews who have ditched their original family names and adopted common names from the country in which they now live. They don’t follow the Mosaic law like their brethren the Hisadic/Ultraorthodox Jew does with their characteristic, giveaway hairstyles and beards. They look just like you and me. This kind of Jew Phaedrus refers to as an “Occult Jew” from the Latin word whose root means ‘hidden’ or concealed. Of course, if this person runs a tailoring business or a café or a car dealership, then he’s no ostensible threat to my country or my way of life. So that’s fine. But if he’s running a major corporation, or a bank, a TV station, a newspaper, an advertising agency, or has a job in the government or is trying to form a new political party or whatever; THEN, I’m afraid, we have a problem. This Jew is analogous to the soldier out of uniform. We know his innate beliefs entitle him to treat the rest of us worse than battery chickens for his personal gain. And if he’s in a position of power, then no matter what he may say to the contrary, he’s out to screw us. His Holy book gives him carte blanche to milk us for all we’re worth.
THIS Jew, reader, is the source of 90% of the world’s problems. He’s constantly claiming to be working in our interests and fighting for value, truth, justice – whatever - but in reality he is doing the exact opposite. He is enriching himself at others’ expense.
Prove it to yourself. The next time you see some big business has collapsed as a result of fraud, do a little bit of digging on the internet. Investigate the pasts of the CEO, the Managing Director or the Finance Director. You may be surprised to find that in the VAST MAJORITY of instances, at least one of these key figures will be Jewish. But you’ll hardly ever, in any TV, radio, or newspaper report, be informed of this vital detail. It’s something you have to discover for yourself…
Here, let us make things easy for your first investigation: LORD BLACK, formerly of Hollinger International. Black is simply the latest in a long, long, long line of Jewish crooks going back centuries. Happy investigations…
Wednesday, May 16, 2007
A Jewish President for France!
There will be hearty celebrations in Israel today as yet another Jew takes control of yet another country. Later this afternoon, President Sarkozy takes the reigns from Chirac in France. It had to happen sometime. There will be blood on the streets, and the firestorm of antisemitism sweeping europe will have plenty to feed it when his ethnicity and his true allegiances are exposed.
Russia Under Threat
Condoleeza Rice took the message to Moscow from her Zionist masters in Washington. The message was entirely clear and uncompromising. The US will go ahead with siting a missile system in Russia's back yard, regardless of Russia's legitimate concerns.
Phaedrus is pro-nationalist. Though fiercely proud of the US for what it once stood for in the world, Phaedrus recognizes that other countries besides ours have the same right. Not nationalism in a mean-minded, razor-slashing bellicose fashion, but the kind of proud, independent yet benign form, with due respect for the ways of others and for the right of others to choose their own destiny in the same way that we expect them not to try to meddle with our way of life. It is NOT right to try to force democracy on those countries that don't want it. Democracy is a tool of the Jews. It permits Jewish control in countries where it would otherwise never gain a foothold. The US has been heckling Russia lately over its failure to embrace full-blown democracy. What the Bush administration is really saying is: "You're making things difficult for the Jews to gain control of your country." That's what it REALLY amounts to. And Putin knows it. His government knows it. They face a real threat from the Zionist Kasparov cabal. Kasparov and his fellow plotters in Russia and beyond (Washington, London and Tel Aviv) are working feverishly to overthrow the democratically-elected Putin. Now this additional threat of a missile system on the doorstep. Phaedrus believes that Russia was unduly gracious in allowing Poland to join NATO on the break-up of the old Warsaw Pact. It was a gesture of good faith on their part to do so. That gesture has now been thrown back in its face.
This missile plan is a step WAY TOO FAR. It must be resisted at ALL costs. Even if that should mean that Russia must invade Poland and provoke a showdown with NATO. Russia must NOT give in on this issue. It is the rubicon. If crossed, Russia as an independent state will cease to exist. It is THAT important. Putin must now show his mettle.
Phaedrus is pro-nationalist. Though fiercely proud of the US for what it once stood for in the world, Phaedrus recognizes that other countries besides ours have the same right. Not nationalism in a mean-minded, razor-slashing bellicose fashion, but the kind of proud, independent yet benign form, with due respect for the ways of others and for the right of others to choose their own destiny in the same way that we expect them not to try to meddle with our way of life. It is NOT right to try to force democracy on those countries that don't want it. Democracy is a tool of the Jews. It permits Jewish control in countries where it would otherwise never gain a foothold. The US has been heckling Russia lately over its failure to embrace full-blown democracy. What the Bush administration is really saying is: "You're making things difficult for the Jews to gain control of your country." That's what it REALLY amounts to. And Putin knows it. His government knows it. They face a real threat from the Zionist Kasparov cabal. Kasparov and his fellow plotters in Russia and beyond (Washington, London and Tel Aviv) are working feverishly to overthrow the democratically-elected Putin. Now this additional threat of a missile system on the doorstep. Phaedrus believes that Russia was unduly gracious in allowing Poland to join NATO on the break-up of the old Warsaw Pact. It was a gesture of good faith on their part to do so. That gesture has now been thrown back in its face.
This missile plan is a step WAY TOO FAR. It must be resisted at ALL costs. Even if that should mean that Russia must invade Poland and provoke a showdown with NATO. Russia must NOT give in on this issue. It is the rubicon. If crossed, Russia as an independent state will cease to exist. It is THAT important. Putin must now show his mettle.
Stand Up and Defend the First Amendment!
Phaedrus has been moved once again to write on the fundamental human right of free speech and freedom of expression. This follows the reading of various other blogs and discussion groups wherein an increasingly common call just recently is for new laws in the U.S. to prevent the spread of so-called “Hate Crime.”
The very term itself is reminiscent of George Orwell’s concept of “Thought Crime” which appears in his classic novel , Nineteen-Eighty-Four. Though written some 60 years ago, the plot of this great book (which in those distant days seemed alarmist and improbable in the extreme) continues to increasingly converge with reality as the decades have rolled by.
The US Constitution, (like Magna Carta upon which it is based) provided certain vital protections for its citizenry. These protections were there for very good reasons and were hard fought for. And yet they are now under attack once again. Tony Blair has now pretty-much completed the dismemberment of Magna Carta in the United Kingdom. This was something insisted upon by his Jewish boss, Rupert Murdoch in 1996, when Blair had to go on bended knee to visit the Jew on his private island in order to convince the soft-porn media mogul that his business interests would be protected under a new Labour government, and that in exchange for such protection, the Jew would use his media interests in Britain to promote Blair as the new way forward in British politics; thereby ditching his previous 15 year alliance with the ailing Tory Party.
Now we see similar siren voices calling for change here in the United States. The popular chant from the Liberals and minorities is to outlaw language which is insulting and/or likely to generate hatred against others on the grounds of their race, religion, or sexual orientation Phaedrus has no doubt that many of these calls are from genuine, well-meaning types who’re simply blind as to the ENORMITY of the consequences. They are unwittingly fighting to fulfill a long-cherished Jewish dream.
The First Amendment is the TRUE Gold Standard of freedom from oppression in America. Forget about the right to keep and bear arms for a moment, for that is in effect a SUBSIDIARY right. Those guys and gals in the NRA – who deserve our greatest respect – are simply kidding themselves that having a gun in the back of the closet is their ultimate guarantee of freedom. This outlook is backward and defeatist. Why? Because that proud boast, “You can take my gun when you can prize it from my cold, dead hands” is exactly what will happen if the gun-owners of America allow the First Amendment to fall. Not protecting the First will bring the day of reckoning with a rogue, alien-controlled government (like our current one) to you and your family far, far more surely and swiftly than would otherwise be the case.
The reason for this is twofold. Firstly, the greatest danger facing this country today is the same one Ben Franklin clearly warned us about over 200 years ago: the Jews. If the American people allow a law to pass that constrains free speech on racial or religious grounds, then who’s the major benefactor going to be? Yeah, those very same slimeballs that far-sighted Franklin warned us all about. All of a sudden, you’ll find an overnight blackout of information about what the Jews are up to. They’ll carry on their stealthy path towards world domination at a faster rate than ever; yet you’ll never hear any more about it! The only media you’ll be able to read, see or listen to will be that 96% of it which is firmly under Jewish control. Commentators like Phaedrus and thousands of others who have woken up to what’s going on and why the world is as screwed-up as it is, will have been gagged. We’ll be in jail and they’ll have seized our computers. Then there’ll be nothing but the soothing babble of Jewish TV telling us everything’s fine. You’ll just wake up one day and they’ll come for you and take your gun. You won’t even know it’s about to happen. Probably four in the morning. And that will be that. The unquestionable end of freedom in America will become apparent on that day.
But you know what? Freedom REALLY died when and because you and your NRA buddies and the militias up and down this great country didn’t stand up to defend the First. THAT was the REAL day on which freedom died. And the First is under threat in America RIGHT NOW. So before you pick up your guns, just pick up those phones RIGHT NOW and call your representatives.
Tell them you won’t stand for any diminution of your right to speak freely on any matter you please and in any way you please.
Ask them which way they stand on the issue. DEMAND they tell you truthfully. YOU call the shots. They’re there to serve YOU, not the other way around. Let’s all work to keep it that way. THE FIRST IS UNDER ATTACK FROM WITHIN – DEFEND IT!
Phaedrus has been moved once again to write on the fundamental human right of free speech and freedom of expression. This follows the reading of various other blogs and discussion groups wherein an increasingly common call just recently is for new laws in the U.S. to prevent the spread of so-called “Hate Crime.”
The very term itself is reminiscent of George Orwell’s concept of “Thought Crime” which appears in his classic novel , Nineteen-Eighty-Four. Though written some 60 years ago, the plot of this great book (which in those distant days seemed alarmist and improbable in the extreme) continues to increasingly converge with reality as the decades have rolled by.
The US Constitution, (like Magna Carta upon which it is based) provided certain vital protections for its citizenry. These protections were there for very good reasons and were hard fought for. And yet they are now under attack once again. Tony Blair has now pretty-much completed the dismemberment of Magna Carta in the United Kingdom. This was something insisted upon by his Jewish boss, Rupert Murdoch in 1996, when Blair had to go on bended knee to visit the Jew on his private island in order to convince the soft-porn media mogul that his business interests would be protected under a new Labour government, and that in exchange for such protection, the Jew would use his media interests in Britain to promote Blair as the new way forward in British politics; thereby ditching his previous 15 year alliance with the ailing Tory Party.
Now we see similar siren voices calling for change here in the United States. The popular chant from the Liberals and minorities is to outlaw language which is insulting and/or likely to generate hatred against others on the grounds of their race, religion, or sexual orientation Phaedrus has no doubt that many of these calls are from genuine, well-meaning types who’re simply blind as to the ENORMITY of the consequences. They are unwittingly fighting to fulfill a long-cherished Jewish dream.
The First Amendment is the TRUE Gold Standard of freedom from oppression in America. Forget about the right to keep and bear arms for a moment, for that is in effect a SUBSIDIARY right. Those guys and gals in the NRA – who deserve our greatest respect – are simply kidding themselves that having a gun in the back of the closet is their ultimate guarantee of freedom. This outlook is backward and defeatist. Why? Because that proud boast, “You can take my gun when you can prize it from my cold, dead hands” is exactly what will happen if the gun-owners of America allow the First Amendment to fall. Not protecting the First will bring the day of reckoning with a rogue, alien-controlled government (like our current one) to you and your family far, far more surely and swiftly than would otherwise be the case.
The reason for this is twofold. Firstly, the greatest danger facing this country today is the same one Ben Franklin clearly warned us about over 200 years ago: the Jews. If the American people allow a law to pass that constrains free speech on racial or religious grounds, then who’s the major benefactor going to be? Yeah, those very same slimeballs that far-sighted Franklin warned us all about. All of a sudden, you’ll find an overnight blackout of information about what the Jews are up to. They’ll carry on their stealthy path towards world domination at a faster rate than ever; yet you’ll never hear any more about it! The only media you’ll be able to read, see or listen to will be that 96% of it which is firmly under Jewish control. Commentators like Phaedrus and thousands of others who have woken up to what’s going on and why the world is as screwed-up as it is, will have been gagged. We’ll be in jail and they’ll have seized our computers. Then there’ll be nothing but the soothing babble of Jewish TV telling us everything’s fine. You’ll just wake up one day and they’ll come for you and take your gun. You won’t even know it’s about to happen. Probably four in the morning. And that will be that. The unquestionable end of freedom in America will become apparent on that day.
But you know what? Freedom REALLY died when and because you and your NRA buddies and the militias up and down this great country didn’t stand up to defend the First. THAT was the REAL day on which freedom died. And the First is under threat in America RIGHT NOW. So before you pick up your guns, just pick up those phones RIGHT NOW and call your representatives.
Tell them you won’t stand for any diminution of your right to speak freely on any matter you please and in any way you please.
Ask them which way they stand on the issue. DEMAND they tell you truthfully. YOU call the shots. They’re there to serve YOU, not the other way around. Let’s all work to keep it that way. THE FIRST IS UNDER ATTACK FROM WITHIN – DEFEND IT!
The Jewish Problem: a peaceful soution?
Phaedrus has been saddened by the sudden rash of hate-mail that has been received over the last few days. It appears some of the articles within this log have struck a raw nerve on the part of some (presumably Jewish) persons.
Phaedrus is mystified as to the reasons behind this backlash. Wherein these pages has it ever been suggested that the Jews should be wiped out or expelled? Has another Holocaust been called for? Certainly not. Let the position be clarified beyond doubt: Phaedrus does not condone violence. Violence only leads to violence and this is a fact that the Israelis ought to remember when they’re busily killing innocent children in Palestine.
The observations made herein are not intended to generate hatred towards the Jews. There are no shortage of those elsewhere on the Internet with other people pouring gasoline on the fire. These writings are rather a serious attempt to find a peaceful solution to this age-old problem and an attempt to forestall another Holocaust which is widely believed by all sides to be increasingly likely. The Jews need to be protected from themselves, it is clear, and this is the aim of these writings. A better world, not just for the Jews, but for ALL of us, Jews and Gentiles alike.
Generalizations can be problematic. When the word “Jew” is used in the context of these writings, it is not in reference to the ordinary Jew in the street who maybe runs a tailors shop, a jewelers, pawnbrokers, a bakery or whatever. These ‘ordinary’ Jews are as much a victim of their brethren as the rest of us are. People who throw bricks through the windows of small Jewish businesses or spit at Jews in the street or vandalize their cemeteries are not helping the situation at all; they are not confronting the real culprits and Phaedrus is happy to unreservedly condemn such behavior.
The Jews under consideration here have very much grander ambitions for themselves and their families than simply running a shop. This will become apparent later in this log when specifics are dealt with. Having considered the problem from all angles over very many years, Phaedrus believes that the following pan-global measures must be implemented as a matter of the utmost urgency:
1. Excluded professions and businesses: no Jew should be permitted to (directly or indirectly) hold any post or have any interest in the areas of law and the judiciary, the media in all its forms (including advertising); local, national and international government, the civil service, international finance and banking.
2. No business owned or controlled by any one Jew (or his/her family) should have a market capitalization of more than US$10 million and such equity interest limited to one entity only with no holding corporations, cross-holdings or proxy-ownerships permitted.
3. A total ban on any Jewish business federations and lobby groups such as AIPAC in the US, Labour Friends of Israel in the UK, and the Bilderberg Group (multinational) to name but three of all-too-many.
4. The re-establishment of ‘Israel’ away from Arab lands and the return of the land currently referred to as ‘Israel’ to Palestine whence it came and from which it was annexed in 1948. Jews would still be permitted to visit their holy sites there and this right in perpetuity would be guaranteed by a reformed, Jew-free United Nations.
5. The immediate re-introduction of exchange controls for international capital transfers of over $1m.
6. The abolition of the World Bank, the IMF, the OECD and their spin-offs and a complete reform of the UN.
7. The dissolution of the European Union.
From the above, Phaedrus trusts that even the most vehement detractors will accept that only peaceful solutions are herein put forward for consideration. Violence of any kind is only deprecated, not advocated or even suggested. Peaceful protest against injustice is an inalienable right which WILL be exercised and indeed MUST be exercised. If ever it were to be banned, then violence would become the only alternative. No one with any sense wants to see that eventuality come to pass.
And finally, if YOU are one of the Jews who threatened to kill Phaedrus just for voicing his democratic views, it is to be hoped that you will recognize that Phaedrus has never, ever called for YOUR death – not even in the light of your vile and vicious outpourings of hate.
Phaedrus is mystified as to the reasons behind this backlash. Wherein these pages has it ever been suggested that the Jews should be wiped out or expelled? Has another Holocaust been called for? Certainly not. Let the position be clarified beyond doubt: Phaedrus does not condone violence. Violence only leads to violence and this is a fact that the Israelis ought to remember when they’re busily killing innocent children in Palestine.
The observations made herein are not intended to generate hatred towards the Jews. There are no shortage of those elsewhere on the Internet with other people pouring gasoline on the fire. These writings are rather a serious attempt to find a peaceful solution to this age-old problem and an attempt to forestall another Holocaust which is widely believed by all sides to be increasingly likely. The Jews need to be protected from themselves, it is clear, and this is the aim of these writings. A better world, not just for the Jews, but for ALL of us, Jews and Gentiles alike.
Generalizations can be problematic. When the word “Jew” is used in the context of these writings, it is not in reference to the ordinary Jew in the street who maybe runs a tailors shop, a jewelers, pawnbrokers, a bakery or whatever. These ‘ordinary’ Jews are as much a victim of their brethren as the rest of us are. People who throw bricks through the windows of small Jewish businesses or spit at Jews in the street or vandalize their cemeteries are not helping the situation at all; they are not confronting the real culprits and Phaedrus is happy to unreservedly condemn such behavior.
The Jews under consideration here have very much grander ambitions for themselves and their families than simply running a shop. This will become apparent later in this log when specifics are dealt with. Having considered the problem from all angles over very many years, Phaedrus believes that the following pan-global measures must be implemented as a matter of the utmost urgency:
1. Excluded professions and businesses: no Jew should be permitted to (directly or indirectly) hold any post or have any interest in the areas of law and the judiciary, the media in all its forms (including advertising); local, national and international government, the civil service, international finance and banking.
2. No business owned or controlled by any one Jew (or his/her family) should have a market capitalization of more than US$10 million and such equity interest limited to one entity only with no holding corporations, cross-holdings or proxy-ownerships permitted.
3. A total ban on any Jewish business federations and lobby groups such as AIPAC in the US, Labour Friends of Israel in the UK, and the Bilderberg Group (multinational) to name but three of all-too-many.
4. The re-establishment of ‘Israel’ away from Arab lands and the return of the land currently referred to as ‘Israel’ to Palestine whence it came and from which it was annexed in 1948. Jews would still be permitted to visit their holy sites there and this right in perpetuity would be guaranteed by a reformed, Jew-free United Nations.
5. The immediate re-introduction of exchange controls for international capital transfers of over $1m.
6. The abolition of the World Bank, the IMF, the OECD and their spin-offs and a complete reform of the UN.
7. The dissolution of the European Union.
From the above, Phaedrus trusts that even the most vehement detractors will accept that only peaceful solutions are herein put forward for consideration. Violence of any kind is only deprecated, not advocated or even suggested. Peaceful protest against injustice is an inalienable right which WILL be exercised and indeed MUST be exercised. If ever it were to be banned, then violence would become the only alternative. No one with any sense wants to see that eventuality come to pass.
And finally, if YOU are one of the Jews who threatened to kill Phaedrus just for voicing his democratic views, it is to be hoped that you will recognize that Phaedrus has never, ever called for YOUR death – not even in the light of your vile and vicious outpourings of hate.
Saturday, May 12, 2007
Jewish-Controlled Media Destroys Young Minds
No one in their right mind would consider going to the trouble of routing a SEWER PIPE into their living room and disgorging raw sewage into their homes 24/7.
Yet this is exactly what millions around the world have done by signing up with media concerns such as Sky TV in the UK, Fox TV in America and Star TV in Asia. All three of these companies are owned by News Corporation, which is in turn owned by Australian-born JEW Rupert Murdoch. And that is the tip of SOME iceberg.
If a guy with a clip-board approaches you in the street and asks, “How would you like raw sewage piped into your home 24/7 for just $50 a month?” You’re going to think they’re either joking or mentally ill. But if the same person were to say, “Hey, I can sign you up with a GREAT satellite TV service that will provide you with quality programming 24/7 for just fifty bucks a month!” you MIGHT be tempted to take it further. And millions around the world have regrettably done so. It amounts to the same thing, however. Raw sewage, though, would just stink and mess up your carpets and furniture. Cable/Satellite TV, on the other hand, does the same thing with the minds of our children and young people. According to Jew Watch (www.jewwatch.com) over 95% of western media is owned and/or controlled by Jewish corporations. Visit the site yourself and see. It’s truly shocking to see the extent of Jewish influence in popular culture world-wide today.
If on the other hand you simply believe there’s no reason why Jews shouldn’t own so much of the media, then please, please, please do a moment’s extra research. Just use your favorite search engine and type in something like Bhutan+Television+Crimewave and read how this tiny Himalayan paradise (the original utopian Shangri-La) was reduced to a lawless, drunken shambles by the impact of Murdoch's satellite TV service within a very short time of its introduction. The surest proof thus far of how television can poison the minds of young and old alike in equal measure - and in next to no time at all.
Yet this is exactly what millions around the world have done by signing up with media concerns such as Sky TV in the UK, Fox TV in America and Star TV in Asia. All three of these companies are owned by News Corporation, which is in turn owned by Australian-born JEW Rupert Murdoch. And that is the tip of SOME iceberg.
If a guy with a clip-board approaches you in the street and asks, “How would you like raw sewage piped into your home 24/7 for just $50 a month?” You’re going to think they’re either joking or mentally ill. But if the same person were to say, “Hey, I can sign you up with a GREAT satellite TV service that will provide you with quality programming 24/7 for just fifty bucks a month!” you MIGHT be tempted to take it further. And millions around the world have regrettably done so. It amounts to the same thing, however. Raw sewage, though, would just stink and mess up your carpets and furniture. Cable/Satellite TV, on the other hand, does the same thing with the minds of our children and young people. According to Jew Watch (www.jewwatch.com) over 95% of western media is owned and/or controlled by Jewish corporations. Visit the site yourself and see. It’s truly shocking to see the extent of Jewish influence in popular culture world-wide today.
If on the other hand you simply believe there’s no reason why Jews shouldn’t own so much of the media, then please, please, please do a moment’s extra research. Just use your favorite search engine and type in something like Bhutan+Television+Crimewave and read how this tiny Himalayan paradise (the original utopian Shangri-La) was reduced to a lawless, drunken shambles by the impact of Murdoch's satellite TV service within a very short time of its introduction. The surest proof thus far of how television can poison the minds of young and old alike in equal measure - and in next to no time at all.
Mickey Mouse gives CNN and BBC the shudders!
CNN and BBC; two of the most Jewish-influenced networks in international TV news had the nerve to run a story about a Mickey Mouse-like character on a Palestinian TV program that they accused of being a propaganda tool for instilling anti-Semitic hatred in the minds of young Palestinian TV viewers.
Curious, nevertheless, how the BBC and CNN never tell the OTHER side about how the children of Israel are instructed from a very young age to DETEST not only Muslim children, but additionally EVERY non-Jew the world over. The sole difference here, being that the Jews of Israel are rather more discreet about how they go about infecting the minds of their children.
Indeed, the Jews prefer the time-honoured method: endless one-to-one readings from those closely guarded (unabridged) versions of the Talmud, which are FAR more poisonous to young minds than any cartoon character could possibly be.
Curious, nevertheless, how the BBC and CNN never tell the OTHER side about how the children of Israel are instructed from a very young age to DETEST not only Muslim children, but additionally EVERY non-Jew the world over. The sole difference here, being that the Jews of Israel are rather more discreet about how they go about infecting the minds of their children.
Indeed, the Jews prefer the time-honoured method: endless one-to-one readings from those closely guarded (unabridged) versions of the Talmud, which are FAR more poisonous to young minds than any cartoon character could possibly be.
BBC Backs Bloomberg for Presisent!
The BBC World TV channel plugs its fellow Jewish buddy and New York City mayor, Michael Bloomberg’s financially-orientated media business, extolling how all these hot-shot stock traders can’t possibly manage without its “rich market information resources.”
No doubt the share price will rise as a result of this remarkably favourable report, which is oddly convenient, since Bloomberg is also reported (in the same item, curiously enough) to be needing to sell some of his stock to finance his widely-anticipated forthcoming US presidential campaign!
The BBC’s Charter expressly prohibits commercial endorsements, but since this organisation is TOTALLY INFESTED WITH JEWS - as is the British government AND Washington DC - the ambition of a fellow JEW in need can be readily publicized, it seems.
The BBC backs Jew Bloomberg for President! World peace moves another step closer! – if anyone is stoopid enough to believe the Jewish Media, anyway.
No doubt the share price will rise as a result of this remarkably favourable report, which is oddly convenient, since Bloomberg is also reported (in the same item, curiously enough) to be needing to sell some of his stock to finance his widely-anticipated forthcoming US presidential campaign!
The BBC’s Charter expressly prohibits commercial endorsements, but since this organisation is TOTALLY INFESTED WITH JEWS - as is the British government AND Washington DC - the ambition of a fellow JEW in need can be readily publicized, it seems.
The BBC backs Jew Bloomberg for President! World peace moves another step closer! – if anyone is stoopid enough to believe the Jewish Media, anyway.
Holocaust Survivors Continue to Claim Compensation
The shocking number of Holocau$t[tm]victims are only outnumbered by the astonishingly high number of Holocaust SURVIVORS with their hands held out for compensation. Hitler was astonishingly unsuccessful, it appears, in spite of what ‘officially-approved history’ tells us.
“Never in the field of human compensation have SO many lucky survivors, claimed SO much, from SO many innocent suckers” – as Winston Churchill would have said, had he survived into the 3rd millennium.
“Never in the field of human compensation have SO many lucky survivors, claimed SO much, from SO many innocent suckers” – as Winston Churchill would have said, had he survived into the 3rd millennium.
Blair's Norther Ireland Success
Blair’s SOLE success, which wasn’t even his original idea, was this week displayed in Northern Ireland when two former bitter enemies, Martin McGuinness and Ian Paisley both pledged to work together for peace in the Province.
It’s a pity for Blair, though, that it was all began by someone else altogether – former British prime minister John Major, culminating with the Good Friday Agreement of 1996, and simply CONTINUED by the soon-to-be war criminal, Blair.
Strangely there was no sign of John Major at this showpiece ceremony. He was presumably not invited and was said to be watching a cricket match in London! Cricket’s not THAT important – even to Mr. Major. Let’s hope Major gets full credit for this achievement, rather than the damnable, slimy war criminal who stood before everyone that day, proclaiming his (non-existent) achievements in various other areas of policy – thereby attempting to leave a slightly less bloody stain in the minds of people of Britain and Ireland than would otherwise be the case.
It’s a pity for Blair, though, that it was all began by someone else altogether – former British prime minister John Major, culminating with the Good Friday Agreement of 1996, and simply CONTINUED by the soon-to-be war criminal, Blair.
Strangely there was no sign of John Major at this showpiece ceremony. He was presumably not invited and was said to be watching a cricket match in London! Cricket’s not THAT important – even to Mr. Major. Let’s hope Major gets full credit for this achievement, rather than the damnable, slimy war criminal who stood before everyone that day, proclaiming his (non-existent) achievements in various other areas of policy – thereby attempting to leave a slightly less bloody stain in the minds of people of Britain and Ireland than would otherwise be the case.
US = UK = Israel: three countries with one government
As part of as-yet-unindicted-war-criminal Tony Blair’s plans to make Britain a safer place following the backlash from his illegal war in Iraq, it was proposed to introduce a National Identity Card scheme, whereby persons freely walking the streets of Britain (as they have throughout all recorded time) would be required by law to produce some state-contrived piece of plastic that would enable them to be instantly identified as either a terrorist or a non-terrorist as the case may be. The cost of this ridiculous project has, it has been revealed, increased by - get this - US$1.4bn in the last year ALONE! Such an increase was, curiously enough, predicted by top university the London School of Economics and subsequently dismissed by the government as “alarmist”(!!!)
Phaedrus concludes that this project will be a total, dismal and highly costly failure. One cannot prevent terrorist atrocities by requiring everyone to carry a piece of plastic, no matter how many biological identifiers it carries.
The only REAL way to prevent further attacks on London (like those of the 7th of July 2005) is to STOP SUCKING AMERICAN DICK. America is controlled by Israel and has been for decades. Now Britain is (thanks largely to Blair, Major and Thatcher) likewise controlled by Israeli Jews. Simply break the connection! When Israel slaughters Palestinian children, don’t just sit in guilty silence. SPEAK OUT! Break off diplomacy with Israel! Break off diplomacy with the US! Make a difference! DO SOMETHING positively pro-active for once. Try to show the rest of the world you’re not in Israel’s pocket – even if you are.
Phaedrus concludes that this project will be a total, dismal and highly costly failure. One cannot prevent terrorist atrocities by requiring everyone to carry a piece of plastic, no matter how many biological identifiers it carries.
The only REAL way to prevent further attacks on London (like those of the 7th of July 2005) is to STOP SUCKING AMERICAN DICK. America is controlled by Israel and has been for decades. Now Britain is (thanks largely to Blair, Major and Thatcher) likewise controlled by Israeli Jews. Simply break the connection! When Israel slaughters Palestinian children, don’t just sit in guilty silence. SPEAK OUT! Break off diplomacy with Israel! Break off diplomacy with the US! Make a difference! DO SOMETHING positively pro-active for once. Try to show the rest of the world you’re not in Israel’s pocket – even if you are.
UK Interest Rates Rise Again
Prime Lending Rate in Britain rose again on Thursday, further pushing up the cost of borrowing for the hundreds of thousands of young Britons who desperately want to leave home and start normal lives like everyone else since monkeys descended from trees.
Friday, May 11, 2007
Gordon Brown: Just Another Traitor
So Blair is dead. Long live Brown! A new beginning; a fresh start for Britain!
Sadly, it won´t happen. If Brown gains the premiership, he will simply be the latest in a long line of traitors who´ve sold Britain down the river, all the way back as far as Harold Wilson and Ted Heath and including Margaret Thatcher. They have all done their little bit to destroy this once-great country´s cultural heritage. They have - and continue to - sell it down the river at the instigation of their Internationalist cronies and paymasters.
Take the House of Lords, for example. It was a reasonably competent revising chamber up until Blair took power. He then set about ´reforming´it - selling off its seats to all-comers via the Jewish broker, Lord Levy. Now 10 years on, this once-venerable old institution resembles a multicultural version of the Muppet Show, riddled with blacks, lesbians and Jews. Anything that the British were once proud of has been destroyed on purpose by the instigators: the Internationalist-Jewish cabal. And I dare say it will be much worse still in 10 or 20 years from now.
This same surge of cultural genocide is not confined to Britain, either. It is a pan-european problem in all countries controlled by the Jews (all of the EU countries for a start). And in the US, too, the same dark forces are at work trying to create chaos and break people´s sense of national identity. Only free-thinkers who turn off their Jew-controlled televisions and discard their Jewish newspapers and research these issues via the Internet can prevent a cultural meltdown and the ultimate nightmare of a One World Government presiding over a borderless planet.
Sadly, it won´t happen. If Brown gains the premiership, he will simply be the latest in a long line of traitors who´ve sold Britain down the river, all the way back as far as Harold Wilson and Ted Heath and including Margaret Thatcher. They have all done their little bit to destroy this once-great country´s cultural heritage. They have - and continue to - sell it down the river at the instigation of their Internationalist cronies and paymasters.
Take the House of Lords, for example. It was a reasonably competent revising chamber up until Blair took power. He then set about ´reforming´it - selling off its seats to all-comers via the Jewish broker, Lord Levy. Now 10 years on, this once-venerable old institution resembles a multicultural version of the Muppet Show, riddled with blacks, lesbians and Jews. Anything that the British were once proud of has been destroyed on purpose by the instigators: the Internationalist-Jewish cabal. And I dare say it will be much worse still in 10 or 20 years from now.
This same surge of cultural genocide is not confined to Britain, either. It is a pan-european problem in all countries controlled by the Jews (all of the EU countries for a start). And in the US, too, the same dark forces are at work trying to create chaos and break people´s sense of national identity. Only free-thinkers who turn off their Jew-controlled televisions and discard their Jewish newspapers and research these issues via the Internet can prevent a cultural meltdown and the ultimate nightmare of a One World Government presiding over a borderless planet.
Thursday, May 10, 2007
Paris Hilton: too exciting and glamorous for prison?
Phaedrus does not normally pay any attention to ‘celebrities’ and their goings on, but the publicity storm surrounding a certain Paris Hilton’s prison sentence would appear to warrant some comment.
This woman, as we are given to understand, has committed relatively serious traffic violations in respect of drunk driving and driving whilst under a license suspension. The sentence is a pretty lenient 45 days. Not much, quite frankly, for endangering the lives of innocent children and adults by her total selfishness. It is not, obviously, as if she couldn’t afford the services of a chauffeur or taxi driver after all.
Now a report has surfaced that she has stated that she shouldn’t be jailed because she brings glamour and excitement into people’s lives! Paedrus almost choked on reading this. It shows how totally out of touch with reality these ‘celebrity’ types are. Does she seriously expect the sentence to be dropped on account of her fame? And what about all those people (such as this commentator) who derive no excitement or glamor whatsoever from her antics? Or those who haven’t even heard of her? Or worse, have no knowledge of her other than seeing the odd magazine shot of her falling about drunk at parties? As a role model for young women, she’s about as bad as it gets.
It’s always tragic when someone is sent to prison. But often times they do come out as better people. A short spell in jail for Ms. Hilton would show her just how lucky she has been. To rub shoulders with other women whose early lives have been so blighted that they never had so much as a sniff of a chance of growing up to lead normal, useful lives might prove a valuable and humbling experience, resulting in some much-needed personal growth for her.
This woman, as we are given to understand, has committed relatively serious traffic violations in respect of drunk driving and driving whilst under a license suspension. The sentence is a pretty lenient 45 days. Not much, quite frankly, for endangering the lives of innocent children and adults by her total selfishness. It is not, obviously, as if she couldn’t afford the services of a chauffeur or taxi driver after all.
Now a report has surfaced that she has stated that she shouldn’t be jailed because she brings glamour and excitement into people’s lives! Paedrus almost choked on reading this. It shows how totally out of touch with reality these ‘celebrity’ types are. Does she seriously expect the sentence to be dropped on account of her fame? And what about all those people (such as this commentator) who derive no excitement or glamor whatsoever from her antics? Or those who haven’t even heard of her? Or worse, have no knowledge of her other than seeing the odd magazine shot of her falling about drunk at parties? As a role model for young women, she’s about as bad as it gets.
It’s always tragic when someone is sent to prison. But often times they do come out as better people. A short spell in jail for Ms. Hilton would show her just how lucky she has been. To rub shoulders with other women whose early lives have been so blighted that they never had so much as a sniff of a chance of growing up to lead normal, useful lives might prove a valuable and humbling experience, resulting in some much-needed personal growth for her.
Blair resignation: War Criminal to step down
So after 10 years in charge of Britain, what is Blair’s TRUE legacy? The man himself seems a barely recognizable gargoyle of what he was back in 1997. In 1995/96, Phaedrus was immensely impressed by the young Blair. In those early days, Blair was a genuinely decent person, whose innate decency was virtually incandescent. 10 years on, he has become a grotesque caricature of his former self: a mean-minded war criminal who reeks of evil deeds perpetrated upon the people of Iraq and the people of Britain in largely equal measure. The history of Blair’s metamorphosis from angel to demon is reminiscent of Wilde’s classic ‘Picture of Dorian Gray’ and of the pig ‘Napoleon’ in Orwell’s ‘Animal Farm.’
How did it all go SO badly wrong? In addition to starting an illegal and unjustifiable war with Iraq, Blair’s other main achievement in those 10 years has been to preside over the dismemberment of the ancient rights and protections of the British people, leaving them with little more than the worthless ‘rights’ of Chinese peasants. They are now more spied upon than ever before. Their communications are ever more monitored, their private lives ever more probed; their individual genetic identities are progressively violated and digitized on massively expensive and corruptly commissioned state computer systems; they enjoy fewer and fewer protections under the law; they are now at ever-present risk of extradition to the US on the basis of simple prima facie ‘evidence’ even in respect of minor, non-terror related charges and they are still prevented from defending themselves against violation by intruders in their own homes.
Blair’s legacy has been to create the world’s newest, most intrusive and virulent police state in a country that had for eight long centuries been the bedrock and foundation of the freedom of the individual and an inspirational model adopted by other countries around the world.
Meanwhile, the core aims of the bright, young idealistic revolutionaries of 1997 (education, health and social capital) have withered for want of investment, imagination and commitment. The billions that might have made a difference have been frittered away on a Jews’ war in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Labour Party ‘hot-button issues’ lie largely abandoned despite enough hot air over the years to re-inflate the R101. Despite all the rhetoric, public services in Britain in 2007 are no better than they were during the dying days of the former, nearly-as-corrupt Conservative Party. Blair’s true legacy both at home and abroad is basically a fetid weed garden of ill-conceived policy decisions that will take decades to rectify; a generation of terror-related angst for its weary people to endure at home, and record homelessness and bankruptcy among its young people, whose hopes for home-ownership before middle-age grow ever more unrealistic.
How did it all go SO badly wrong? In addition to starting an illegal and unjustifiable war with Iraq, Blair’s other main achievement in those 10 years has been to preside over the dismemberment of the ancient rights and protections of the British people, leaving them with little more than the worthless ‘rights’ of Chinese peasants. They are now more spied upon than ever before. Their communications are ever more monitored, their private lives ever more probed; their individual genetic identities are progressively violated and digitized on massively expensive and corruptly commissioned state computer systems; they enjoy fewer and fewer protections under the law; they are now at ever-present risk of extradition to the US on the basis of simple prima facie ‘evidence’ even in respect of minor, non-terror related charges and they are still prevented from defending themselves against violation by intruders in their own homes.
Blair’s legacy has been to create the world’s newest, most intrusive and virulent police state in a country that had for eight long centuries been the bedrock and foundation of the freedom of the individual and an inspirational model adopted by other countries around the world.
Meanwhile, the core aims of the bright, young idealistic revolutionaries of 1997 (education, health and social capital) have withered for want of investment, imagination and commitment. The billions that might have made a difference have been frittered away on a Jews’ war in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Labour Party ‘hot-button issues’ lie largely abandoned despite enough hot air over the years to re-inflate the R101. Despite all the rhetoric, public services in Britain in 2007 are no better than they were during the dying days of the former, nearly-as-corrupt Conservative Party. Blair’s true legacy both at home and abroad is basically a fetid weed garden of ill-conceived policy decisions that will take decades to rectify; a generation of terror-related angst for its weary people to endure at home, and record homelessness and bankruptcy among its young people, whose hopes for home-ownership before middle-age grow ever more unrealistic.
Wednesday, May 9, 2007
Belgium's Holocaust Shame
I note today that there has been some ceremony taking place in Belgium during which some government flunky apologized for the role of that country in assisting with the rounding up of Jews for shipment east to the Nazi concentration camps over 60 long years ago. Shame on Belgium for bowing to Jewish pressure and perpetuating the Holocaust[T.M., all rights reserved] myth. Sure a lot of Jews died in the second world war; so did a lot of other people, including 20 million Russians that are hardly ever mentioned. Why is it uniquely that the Children of Israel are treated as a special case with all this never-ending remembrance nonsense? The answer, my friends, is MONEY. Once a corporation or a government has apologized for any wrong-doing to anyone, the next step is to make appropriate reparation - financial compen$ation in other words. And the Jews are experts in screwing every cent they can possibly milk out of their ultra-exaggerated losses of that period. The big question is, how much longer can these parasites string the Holocaust income-stream out for? There's absolutely no sign of it ever being allowed to simply pass into history, it seems.
Saturday, May 5, 2007
“Hate Crimes” Herald the Death of Freedom of Speech
“Hate Crimes” Herald the Death of Freedom of Speech
“Hate crime” is a relatively new concept which Jews in governments around the world have contrived in an attempt to criminalize those who stir up racial or religious hatred against our poor, oppressed minorities. Sounds like a good idea, doesn’t it? After all, who can possibly condone anyone calling a black person a “nigger” or a Mexican a “wet back”, a “spic” or a “greaseball” or suggesting that gypsies are dirty thieves that never wash? “We need to modernize,” our leaders tell us, “This language is offensive, archaic and belongs to the past. In our modern, multicultural societies, it has no place” – and so on and so on.
The sheeple shrug their shoulders, look at each other and nod in agreement. “Yeah, I guess that makes sense,” they mumble. They’ve sleepwalked into accepting this seemingly innocuous and well-intentioned common-sense proposal. The only problem is that it is, as usual, the thin end of a VERY BIG wedge indeed that vastly consolidates the grasp the Jew has over the Western media and Western governments.
Take the European Union, for example. Several countries have already adopted some form of ‘Hate Crime’ legislation in satisfaction of a Directive of the Jew-infested European Parliament. It typically criminalizes anyone who stirs up hatred against another person or class of people on grounds of race, religion, or sexual orientation. So African Americans are protected; Catholics, Hindus and Muslims are protected; gays and lesbians are protected. If I therefore lived in Europe and I said all Muslims are terrorists and should be deported, I can be prosecuted. If I said all Catholic priests are paedophiles, likewise. If I said all African Americans take drugs, are lazy and stupid, again, likewise. Which is all fair enough, huh? Well, maybe, maybe not. But consider these fully-referenced quotes from the Jewish Holy book, the Talmud:
“Only the Jews are humans, the Non-Jews are no humans, but cattle.” (goyim – human cattle) – (Kerithuth 6b page 78, Jebhammoth 61a)
“The Non-Jews have been created to serve the Jews as slaves.” - (Midrasch Talpioth 225)
“The Non-Jews have to be avoided, even more than sick pigs.” - (Orach Chaiim 57, 6a)
“Sexual intercourse with Non-Jews is like sexual intercourse with animals” – (Kethuboth 3b)
“The birth-rate of the Non-Jews has to be suppressed massively” - (Zohar II, 4b)
“As you replace lost cows and donkeys, so you shall replace dead Non-Jews.” – (Iore Dea 337,1)
“To box an Israeli on the ear, is like to box on the ear of god.” – (Sanhedrin 58b)
"Jahveh [God] is never angry about the Jews, just about the Non-Jews” – (Talmud IV/8/4a)
“The human [the Jew] has to pray every day three times, because Jahveh didn’t make him a goyim, not a female and not an ignorant.” – (Talmud V/2/43b + 44a)
“Everywhere they [the Jews] come, they will be the princes of the lords” – (Sanhedrin 104a)
“I [Jahveh] make you [the Jewry] the ancestor of the peoples, I make you the selected one amongst the peoples, I make you the king over the peoples, I make you the loved one amongst the peoples, I make you the best one amongst the peoples, I make you the trusted one amongst the peoples” – (Schabbat 105a)
“Towards a Non-Jew the Jew doesn’t cause an adultery… Punishable for the Jew, is just the adultery towards his next, that means the wife of a Jew. The wife of the Non-Jew is excluded” – (Talmud IV/4/52b)
There is no wife for the goyim, they really aren’t their wives” - (Talmud IV/4/81 + 82ab)
“You [the Jews] have made me, Jahveh, the only true lord in the world, so I will make you the only ruler in the world”
“Who wants to be smart shall occupy himself with money matters, because there are no corner pillars in the Tora that are more important, because they are like a sparkling fountain” – (Talmud IV/3/173b)
“Jews always have to try to deceive Non-Jews” – (Zohar I, 168a)
“Carry on trade with Non-Jews, if they have to pay money for it” - (Abhodah Zarah 2a T)
“Non-Jewish property belongs to the Jew who uses it first” - (Babba Bathra 54b)
“Every Jew is allowed to use lies and perjury to bring a Non-Jew to ruin” - (Babha Kama 113a)
“The possessions of the goyim are like an ownerless desert, and everybody [every Jew] who seizes it, has acquired it” - (Talmud IV/3/54b)
“The Jew is allowed to exploit the mistake of a Non-Jew and to deceive him” - (Talmud IV/1/113b)
“The Jew is allowed to practice usury on the Non-Jew” - (Talmud IV/2/70b)
“When the Messiah comes, all will be slaves of the Jews” - (Erubin 43b)
We can see from the above that the Jews (certainly the Orthodox/Hasidic Jews at least) have a very low opinion of the rest of us mortals!
Now the BIG question is: are the above quotations likely to arouse hatred toward the Jews among the non-Jews that read them? The courts would doubtless say yes, they would. So my publishing these quotes in say Germany, Holland or the UK would land me in court. BUT the paradox is… the quotes THEMSELVES stir up hatred on the part of the Jew against the non-Jew! So the Jews’ Holy book itself would have to be banned under any such Hate Crime laws. But that ain’t gonna happen, because there are also conflicting laws currently in force guaranteeing freedom of worship and religious tolerance! The upshot is that Phaedrus winds up in jail, whilst the Rabbis that propagate this twisted belief system remain untouchable. Is it by accident that this situation has come about? I don’t think so!
Conclusion: If these Jew-sponsored anti-freedom laws ARE introduced into the US., Phaedrus will FLOUT them. I’m sorry. I don’t condone law-breaking except when it’s necessary to defend OUR cherished RIGHTS. If there’s a drug dealer selling crack at the school gates, I MUST as a good citizen warn the kids’ parents. If there’s a paedophile in the park, I MUST as a good citizen warn the kids’ parents. And if the parents feel aggrieved and get angry, then maybe it’s because anger is a PERFECTLY NORMAL HUMAN REACTION when you discover somebody’s done you or one of yours wrong. What's a person supposed to do? Just let these creeps' activities go unchallenged? Phaedrus will continue to expose the activities of the Jews worldwide and if that generates anger, then the CORRECT solution is for the Jew to break with over 4,000 years of tradition and STOP ROBBING, CHEATING, INSTIGATING WARS, AND MANIPULATING THE REST OF US.
“Hate crime” is a relatively new concept which Jews in governments around the world have contrived in an attempt to criminalize those who stir up racial or religious hatred against our poor, oppressed minorities. Sounds like a good idea, doesn’t it? After all, who can possibly condone anyone calling a black person a “nigger” or a Mexican a “wet back”, a “spic” or a “greaseball” or suggesting that gypsies are dirty thieves that never wash? “We need to modernize,” our leaders tell us, “This language is offensive, archaic and belongs to the past. In our modern, multicultural societies, it has no place” – and so on and so on.
The sheeple shrug their shoulders, look at each other and nod in agreement. “Yeah, I guess that makes sense,” they mumble. They’ve sleepwalked into accepting this seemingly innocuous and well-intentioned common-sense proposal. The only problem is that it is, as usual, the thin end of a VERY BIG wedge indeed that vastly consolidates the grasp the Jew has over the Western media and Western governments.
Take the European Union, for example. Several countries have already adopted some form of ‘Hate Crime’ legislation in satisfaction of a Directive of the Jew-infested European Parliament. It typically criminalizes anyone who stirs up hatred against another person or class of people on grounds of race, religion, or sexual orientation. So African Americans are protected; Catholics, Hindus and Muslims are protected; gays and lesbians are protected. If I therefore lived in Europe and I said all Muslims are terrorists and should be deported, I can be prosecuted. If I said all Catholic priests are paedophiles, likewise. If I said all African Americans take drugs, are lazy and stupid, again, likewise. Which is all fair enough, huh? Well, maybe, maybe not. But consider these fully-referenced quotes from the Jewish Holy book, the Talmud:
“Only the Jews are humans, the Non-Jews are no humans, but cattle.” (goyim – human cattle) – (Kerithuth 6b page 78, Jebhammoth 61a)
“The Non-Jews have been created to serve the Jews as slaves.” - (Midrasch Talpioth 225)
“The Non-Jews have to be avoided, even more than sick pigs.” - (Orach Chaiim 57, 6a)
“Sexual intercourse with Non-Jews is like sexual intercourse with animals” – (Kethuboth 3b)
“The birth-rate of the Non-Jews has to be suppressed massively” - (Zohar II, 4b)
“As you replace lost cows and donkeys, so you shall replace dead Non-Jews.” – (Iore Dea 337,1)
“To box an Israeli on the ear, is like to box on the ear of god.” – (Sanhedrin 58b)
"Jahveh [God] is never angry about the Jews, just about the Non-Jews” – (Talmud IV/8/4a)
“The human [the Jew] has to pray every day three times, because Jahveh didn’t make him a goyim, not a female and not an ignorant.” – (Talmud V/2/43b + 44a)
“Everywhere they [the Jews] come, they will be the princes of the lords” – (Sanhedrin 104a)
“I [Jahveh] make you [the Jewry] the ancestor of the peoples, I make you the selected one amongst the peoples, I make you the king over the peoples, I make you the loved one amongst the peoples, I make you the best one amongst the peoples, I make you the trusted one amongst the peoples” – (Schabbat 105a)
“Towards a Non-Jew the Jew doesn’t cause an adultery… Punishable for the Jew, is just the adultery towards his next, that means the wife of a Jew. The wife of the Non-Jew is excluded” – (Talmud IV/4/52b)
There is no wife for the goyim, they really aren’t their wives” - (Talmud IV/4/81 + 82ab)
“You [the Jews] have made me, Jahveh, the only true lord in the world, so I will make you the only ruler in the world”
“Who wants to be smart shall occupy himself with money matters, because there are no corner pillars in the Tora that are more important, because they are like a sparkling fountain” – (Talmud IV/3/173b)
“Jews always have to try to deceive Non-Jews” – (Zohar I, 168a)
“Carry on trade with Non-Jews, if they have to pay money for it” - (Abhodah Zarah 2a T)
“Non-Jewish property belongs to the Jew who uses it first” - (Babba Bathra 54b)
“Every Jew is allowed to use lies and perjury to bring a Non-Jew to ruin” - (Babha Kama 113a)
“The possessions of the goyim are like an ownerless desert, and everybody [every Jew] who seizes it, has acquired it” - (Talmud IV/3/54b)
“The Jew is allowed to exploit the mistake of a Non-Jew and to deceive him” - (Talmud IV/1/113b)
“The Jew is allowed to practice usury on the Non-Jew” - (Talmud IV/2/70b)
“When the Messiah comes, all will be slaves of the Jews” - (Erubin 43b)
We can see from the above that the Jews (certainly the Orthodox/Hasidic Jews at least) have a very low opinion of the rest of us mortals!
Now the BIG question is: are the above quotations likely to arouse hatred toward the Jews among the non-Jews that read them? The courts would doubtless say yes, they would. So my publishing these quotes in say Germany, Holland or the UK would land me in court. BUT the paradox is… the quotes THEMSELVES stir up hatred on the part of the Jew against the non-Jew! So the Jews’ Holy book itself would have to be banned under any such Hate Crime laws. But that ain’t gonna happen, because there are also conflicting laws currently in force guaranteeing freedom of worship and religious tolerance! The upshot is that Phaedrus winds up in jail, whilst the Rabbis that propagate this twisted belief system remain untouchable. Is it by accident that this situation has come about? I don’t think so!
Conclusion: If these Jew-sponsored anti-freedom laws ARE introduced into the US., Phaedrus will FLOUT them. I’m sorry. I don’t condone law-breaking except when it’s necessary to defend OUR cherished RIGHTS. If there’s a drug dealer selling crack at the school gates, I MUST as a good citizen warn the kids’ parents. If there’s a paedophile in the park, I MUST as a good citizen warn the kids’ parents. And if the parents feel aggrieved and get angry, then maybe it’s because anger is a PERFECTLY NORMAL HUMAN REACTION when you discover somebody’s done you or one of yours wrong. What's a person supposed to do? Just let these creeps' activities go unchallenged? Phaedrus will continue to expose the activities of the Jews worldwide and if that generates anger, then the CORRECT solution is for the Jew to break with over 4,000 years of tradition and STOP ROBBING, CHEATING, INSTIGATING WARS, AND MANIPULATING THE REST OF US.
Thursday, May 3, 2007
Lord Browe's Dirty Secret
In a strongly worded statement, the paper claimed Lord Browne had lied "deliberately and repeatedly" under oath in court.
I'm not referring to his gay love-life, but rather his murky background. Consider this article from the British newspaper The Guardian concerning the Mail on Sunday's successful hard-fought exposure of this loathsome criminal:
"The Mail on Sunday said this raised "deeply worrying questions about the system of secret court hearing which is increasingly being used by the rich and powerful to prevent the public knowing the truth about their activities".
"It is also a matter of great concern that such hearings are being used to create a privacy law, made by judges sitting alone and in secret, without reference to parliament," the paper added.
"The Mail on Sunday deplores the fact that, despite lying to the court, Lord Browne was granted an injunction suppressing information of great importance both to the millions of Britons who, through their pensions, are shareholders in BP, and to the tens of thousands who work for the company.
"It was in seeking an injunction to suppress this story that Lord Browne lied about his private life, thereby making it central to the case."
"Lord" Browne is in fact a Concealed Jew (from a Jewish family that has obscured its roots by changing its name and _appearing_ by lifestyle and manners to be of its host country' stock. Something that all the newspapers have somehow been negligent in pointing out for some unaccountable reason. He was due to pocket a ransom of some $35m this summer as a golden handshake from BP., but lying under oath has cost him dearly and he will now have to forgo this handsome sum and face a criminal trial instead.
Whenever one sees the term "rich and powerful" it is advisable to dig deeper, as oftentimes there will be a Jew lurking about somewhere with his hand in the cash-box, as in this case. The newspapers are quite correct to point out that as time goes on, more and more of this type of fraud will simply be hushed-up.
Another Jewish CEO said recently, when faced by a stockholders' revolt over directors' remuneration levels that listed companies are not democracies. The stockholders OWN the company, but the directors RUN it. And of course when these eye-watering sums get paid out to greedy directors, that money comes from the stockholders' pockets. Recent trends have also shown that, whilst stockholders take a hit when a company performs badly, the directors typically do very nicely, irrespective of the company's fortunes.
Phaedrus thinks it's time we made companies a LOT more democratic...
I'm not referring to his gay love-life, but rather his murky background. Consider this article from the British newspaper The Guardian concerning the Mail on Sunday's successful hard-fought exposure of this loathsome criminal:
"The Mail on Sunday said this raised "deeply worrying questions about the system of secret court hearing which is increasingly being used by the rich and powerful to prevent the public knowing the truth about their activities".
"It is also a matter of great concern that such hearings are being used to create a privacy law, made by judges sitting alone and in secret, without reference to parliament," the paper added.
"The Mail on Sunday deplores the fact that, despite lying to the court, Lord Browne was granted an injunction suppressing information of great importance both to the millions of Britons who, through their pensions, are shareholders in BP, and to the tens of thousands who work for the company.
"It was in seeking an injunction to suppress this story that Lord Browne lied about his private life, thereby making it central to the case."
"Lord" Browne is in fact a Concealed Jew (from a Jewish family that has obscured its roots by changing its name and _appearing_ by lifestyle and manners to be of its host country' stock. Something that all the newspapers have somehow been negligent in pointing out for some unaccountable reason. He was due to pocket a ransom of some $35m this summer as a golden handshake from BP., but lying under oath has cost him dearly and he will now have to forgo this handsome sum and face a criminal trial instead.
Whenever one sees the term "rich and powerful" it is advisable to dig deeper, as oftentimes there will be a Jew lurking about somewhere with his hand in the cash-box, as in this case. The newspapers are quite correct to point out that as time goes on, more and more of this type of fraud will simply be hushed-up.
Another Jewish CEO said recently, when faced by a stockholders' revolt over directors' remuneration levels that listed companies are not democracies. The stockholders OWN the company, but the directors RUN it. And of course when these eye-watering sums get paid out to greedy directors, that money comes from the stockholders' pockets. Recent trends have also shown that, whilst stockholders take a hit when a company performs badly, the directors typically do very nicely, irrespective of the company's fortunes.
Phaedrus thinks it's time we made companies a LOT more democratic...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
